Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Conviction Would Not Result in Any Injustice To The Applican1

    Uploaded by

    noname
    The Gujarat High Court refused to stay Rahul Gandhi's conviction in a defamation case for remarks made about Narendra Modi's surname. The 123-page judgment found no grounds to interfere with the lower court's ruling, determining that Gandhi's conviction did not result in injustice and was a just, proper, and legal order.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Conviction Would Not Result in Any Injustice To The Applican1

    Uploaded by

    noname
    4 views1 page
    The Gujarat High Court refused to stay Rahul Gandhi's conviction in a defamation case for remarks made about Narendra Modi's surname. The 123-page judgment found no grounds to interfere with the lower court's ruling, determining that Gandhi's conviction did not result in injustice and was a just, proper, and legal order.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Conviction Would Not Result in Any Injustice to the Applican1

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Gujarat High Court refused to stay Rahul Gandhi's conviction in a defamation case for remarks made about Narendra Modi's surname. The 123-page judgment found no grounds to interfere with the lower court's ruling, determining that Gandhi's conviction did not result in injustice and was a just, proper, and legal order.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    4 views1 page

    Conviction Would Not Result in Any Injustice To The Applican1

    Uploaded by

    noname
    The Gujarat High Court refused to stay Rahul Gandhi's conviction in a defamation case for remarks made about Narendra Modi's surname. The 123-page judgment found no grounds to interfere with the lower court's ruling, determining that Gandhi's conviction did not result in injustice and was a just, proper, and legal order.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Five grounds on which Gujarat High Court

    refused to stay conviction of Rahul Gandhi


    in defamation case [READ JUDGMENT]
    The Court in its 123-page-long judgment underlined grounds against Gandhi which
    Satyendra Wankhade
    Published on : 
    7 Jul, 2023, 6:06 pm
    5 min read
    The Gujarat High Court on Friday delivered its verdict on the plea by Congress leader Rahul
    Gandhi against the conviction and two-year jail term imposed on him by a Magistrate court
    in a criminal defamation case for his remark on 'Modi' surname. [Rahul Gandhi v Purnesh
    Modi]

    Single-judge Justice Hemant Prachchhak determined that no case was made out to stay the
    conviction.

    "In anyway, conviction would not result in any injustice to the applicant. The conviction
    order is just, proper and legal. There is no need to interfere with the said order. Therefore,
    the application is dismissed," the Court held.

    You might also like