Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mechanical Alloying Fe Si NB - Iram, Novembro 07
Mechanical Alloying Fe Si NB - Iram, Novembro 07
Mechanical Alloying Fe Si NB - Iram, Novembro 07
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: In present research, nanocrystalline Fe100−x Six (x = 6.5, 10, 13.5, 20 and 25 at.%) and
Received 25 August 2007 Fe83.5 Si13.5 Nb3 alloy powders were prepared by mechanical alloying using high-energy ball
Received in revised form milling. The resulting powders mainly consist of micron-sized particles with an average
5 November 2007 grain size of less than 20 nm. According to the XRD test results, by increasing the milling time
Accepted 12 November 2007 and/or the Si content the lattice parameter decreases and the internal microstrain increases.
In addition, the specific saturation magnetization diminishes as Si content increases. The
coercive forces of the as-milled nanocrystalline powders are much higher than those of cor-
Keywords: responding Fe–Si bulk alloys with a minimum at 13.5 at.% Si. The presence of Nb retards
Mechanical alloying the crystallite coarsening during annealing but adversely affects the magnetic properties.
Nanostructured Fe–Si powder Annealing of milled powders caused the coercive force to reduce slightly due to reduction
Soft magnetic properties of internal strains.
© 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
∗
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: abachi@sharif.edu (P. Abachi).
0924-0136/$ – see front matter © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.064
j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 3 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 554–560 555
chemical composition and annealing on powder structures be free of physical factors, with Bragg’s peaks near those of the sam-
and magnetic properties were investigated. ple under investigation was the starting Fe powder annealed at 700 ◦ C
for 5 h. The instrumental-broadening-corrected line profile breadth ı
of each reflection 2 was calculated from the parabolic approximation
2. Experimental procedure correction (Klug and Alexander, 1974) given by
Fig. 1 – Scanning electron micrographs of (a) starting powders mixture and Fe86.5 Si13.5 powder milled for (b) 20 h and (c) 40 h.
556 j o u r n a l o f m a t e r i a l s p r o c e s s i n g t e c h n o l o g y 2 0 3 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 554–560
Fig. 2 – Scanning electron micrographs of (a) Fe86.5 Si13.5 and (b) Fe83.5 Si13.5 Nb3 powders milled for 40 h.
cell volume of pure Fe, Fe86.5 Si13.5 and Fe83.5 Si13.5 Nb3 powders
milled for different times. Since Si has a smaller atomic radius
than Fe, the substitutional Fe–Si solid solution has a smaller
lattice parameter and reduced unit cell volume in comparison
with those of pure bcc-Fe. Milling for longer times causes more
Si to be dissolved in the Fe lattice. Fig. 6 shows also the depen-
dence of the Fe–Si alloys lattice parameter on the Si content. By
increasing the Si content, lattice parameter decreases due to
more Si atoms introduce into the Fe lattice in powders milled
for 40 h. Nb has a large atomic radius than Fe and therefore,
Fig. 5 – X-ray diffraction line profile of pure Fe: (a)
Fe–Nb solid solution should have a greater lattice parameter.
Fe86.5 Si13.5 and (b) Fe83.5 Si13.5 Nb3 powders milled for
At the early stages of milling of Fe83.5 Si13.5 Nb3 powder the Si
different times.
atoms dissolve in the Fe lattice and cause the lattice parame-
ter to reduce but it seems that by increasing time the Nb atoms
case the Fe peaks is shifted to higher angles in Fe83.5 Si13.5 Nb3 introduce into structure and expand the Fe lattice (Table 1).
alloys but by increasing the milling time from 20 to 40 h it The increase of the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM)
returns a little to smaller angles. The changes in lattice param- of Fe peaks in Fig. 5 is also an indication for development
eter of the alloys confirm the solution of alloying elements of refined and internally strained grains during mechanical
atoms in the Fe lattice. The lattice parameter was calculated alloying. This effect is pronounced by increase of milling time
for each of the bcc-Fe diffracting planes, (1 1 0), (2 0 0), (2 1 1), (Fig. 5a). The grain size and internal microstrain obtained from
(2 2 0), and (3 1 0), from the XRD patterns. The actual lattice the Williamson–Hall plots are listed in Table 2 for Fe86.5 Si13.5
parameter was obtained as described by Cullity (1978), by plot- and Fe83.5 Si13.5 Nb3 alloy powders milled for different times.
ting the calculated lattice parameter for each Bragg’s angle on The grain size decreases while the microstrain increases with
the y-axis with the corresponding value of cos2 /sin on the milling time. It is worthy to note that although the grain sizes
x-axis and extrapolating to obtain the intercept on the y-axis. have been reduced to a nanometer scale, the size of powder
The lattice parameter reported for the pure ␣-Fe is 2.8664 Å particles are still in the micrometer scale. The results of the
(Anon., 2007). Table 1 shows the lattice parameter and unit same calculations for Fe–Si alloy powders are listed in Table 3,
which represents the grain size and microstrain for alloy pow-
Pure bcc-Fe 2.8664 23.5511 Alloy Grain size (nm) Microstrain (%)
Table 3 – Grain size and microstrain values of the Fe–Si Table 4 – Grain size and microstrain values of Fe86.5 Si13.5
alloy powders with different Si content after 40 h milling and Fe83.5 Si13.5 Nb3 alloy powders annealed at different
temperatures
Alloy Grain size (nm) Microstrain (%)
Alloy Annealing Grain Microstrain
Fe93.5 Si6.5 15.9 0.82 at (◦ C) size (nm) (%)
Fe90 Si10 13.5 0.94
Fe86.5 Si13.5 14.4 1.03 370 16.7 0.65.65
Fe86.5 Si13.5
Fe80 Si20 14.8 1.20 500 44.7 0.60
Fe75 Si25 13.2 1.28
370 12.5 0.89
Fe83.5 Si13.5 Nb3
500 16.9 0.40
ders with different Si content. It seems that by increasing the
Si content, the grain size randomly changes but the micros-
train gradually increases.
The decreasing of crystalline size after milling could be
due to formation of new defects such as dislocations that
can appear in different ways: formation of dense regions of
these dislocations into the grains, pile up the grain boundaries
or untidy clusters into the grain. All these possibilities guide
to formation of sub-grain structures into the original grain,
therefore decreasing the effective size in crystalline region
(Schilling et al., 1996). On the other hand, the increasing of
residual strains into the material could be due to stress fields
associate with the multiplication of the dislocations (Gómez
et al., 2006; Oleszak and Matyja, 1995).
Fig. 7 shows the DSC curves of 40 h milled Fe86.5 Si13.5 and
Fig. 8 – The specific saturation magnetization of as-milled
Fe83.5 Si13.5 Nb3 alloy powders. The main exothermic peak of
Fe–Si powders, single-crystal and polycrystalline Fe–Si
both samples appears at temperature ranging between 400
alloys vs. the Si content.
and 470 ◦ C. Since the maximum temperature in Fig. 7 is esti-
mated to be the same as recrystallization temperature of
sample, the annealed powders at 500 ◦ C could be in fully
recrystallized and then in the grain growth state, whereas the the Si content dependence of s for as-milled (nonstructured)
annealed powders at 370 ◦ C could not experience recrystalliza- powders, single-crystal (Arai et al., 1985) and polycrystalline
tion. Table 4 shows the calculated grain size and internal strain (Bozorth, 1951) Fe–Si alloys. As it can be seen, the Si con-
of powders after annealing at 370 and 500 ◦ C. Obviously, by tent dependence of s for as-milled powders is similar to both
increasing annealing temperature, grain growth has occurred reported latter cases. Referring to saturation magnetization
and the strain has been reduced. It seems that presence of Nb definition as the number of magnetic moments parallel to
retards the grain coarsening during annealing. the applied field per unit volume of the material, increasing
the Si content of alloys leads to decrement of Fe as a ferro-
magnetic component and thereby reduction of the saturation
3.3. Evaluation of magnetic properties
magnetization. Considering Fig. 8, specific saturation mag-
netization values of the as-milled powders are slightly less
According to the vibrating sample magnetometer test results,
than those of the corresponding bulk Fe–Si alloys. This may be
the specific saturation magnetization, s , of Fe–Si alloys
explained by the fact that large volume fractions of disordered
depends on both the structure and the Si content. Fig. 8 shows
regions (the grain boundaries) and extended imperfections
(especially point defects and dislocations) exist in the former
case, while no grain boundary or a very small volume frac-
tion of grain boundaries and few imperfections are present in
the two latter cases. As suggested by Ding and Zhou (Ding et
al., 2001; Zhou et al., 1996), both grain boundaries and imper-
fections can reduce s . Table 5 shows the specific saturation