Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mass Law - An Overview ScienceDirect Topics
Mass Law - An Overview ScienceDirect Topics
The “mass law” in acoustics is the base of air-borne sound insulation, namely,
the higher the density of a material is, the more unlikely it vibrates when
influenced by sound wave.
From: Building Decorative Materials, 2011
Related terms:
Fig. 2.3.2. Dip in sound reduction index seen at critical or coincidence frequency fc for single layer of 13-mm gypsum board (fc = 2.5 k Hz) and
single layer of 0.5-mm steel (fc = 22 kHz).
3.2 Modelisation
Using the volume conservation principle, state équations are:
(4a)
(4b)
where
Using Torricelli’s law, mass flows Qi, are modelled by:
(5)
(6)
(7)
When no fault occurs, the first four components of q correspond to the valves’
commands: qi = uvi, i ∈ {1,…, 4}. On a safe system, qi’s evolution correspond to
a forced switching. The last three components of the discrete state vector, qj, j
∈ {5,6,7} depend on the state vector and a change of value of qj means an
autonomous switching of the system. It can be noticed that and are
function of qi and qj whereas and depends only on qi.
The discrete-time nonlinear representation with the sample time Ts = 0.1 s can
be easily deduced from (4) using the Euler’s discretization method:
Figure 13.25. A typical structure of sound insulation partition (Remes, 2009): (1) two layers of chipboard or medium density fiberboard (screw
fastening); (2) timber studding and mineral wool; (3) air space (empty, no connection between studs); (4) attachment with screws to floor slab; (5)
sealing to floor slab with EPDM rubber band; (6) sealing of the inner plate to the floor slab with sealing mastic; and (7) outer plate layer
extended to floor level.
Doors are usually the weakest sound insulating elements between rooms and
therefore need careful acoustic design. Examination of the sound insulation of
doors presupposes two separate transmission paths to be considered: the
structural transmission through the door leaf and the leak transmission
through the slits. Most doors are designed nowadays as double-panel
structures with sound absorbing and fire-resistant materials in the air cavity to
improve the mechanical and sound insulation properties of the door leaf.
According to the research by Finnish scholars, the reduction of interpanel
connections (glue and support laths) is the key point for structural
improvements. The compromise between good stiffness and good insulation
could be found by replacing laths with elastic contacts or honeycomb supports.
Sound absorption materials filled in the core layer can enhance the
soundproofing of the structure. But above all, sound leak has the most
significant influence on the sound insulation property of doors. It can be
improved by about 6 dB by slit-sealing improvements (Hongisto et al., 2000).
The airborne sound insulation properties of doors are rated according to the
standard GB/T 8485-2008.
Mass law
In the mass-controlled region the TL follows the so-called ‘mass law’. In the
simple case of normal incidence waves on an infinite uniform plate, it is
possible to find an analytical solution to calculate the TL. In this case the
normal incidence mass law (valid for compression wave lengths ≫ plate
thickness) is given by:
(13.4)
where:
pS is the mass per unit surface area of the plate
p0c0 is the characteristic impedance of the gas (air) of mass density p0 and
speed of sound c0.
It is easy to see that in the mass law region the TL increases by 6 dB when
doubling the frequency or doubling the mass per unit surface area. Also,
Equation 13.4 shows that for a given gas (usually air) the TL in the mass law
region depends only on the mass per unit surface area; any modification of the
plate’s stiffness or damping cannot change the level of the TL in this region.
For better sound isolation without increasing the weight too much, it is
possible to adopt specific solutions, such as double wall barriers (see Section
13.5.1).
In practical applications it is more common to deal with incident sound fields
where the angle of the acoustic waves varies randomly from 0° to 90° with
about the same level of probability. For this reason, it is usual to define a
‘random incidence transmission loss’ (TLrandom). Comparison of the predicted
values of TL with the measured value (see Section 13.4.3) shows that better
agreement is achieved by considering a random field with incident angles in
the range 0° to 78° (defined as ‘field transmission loss’, TLfield) rather than
between 0° and 90°: the reason is that in practice it is very difficult to obtain a
real diffuse field in all directions. The relationships between these values in the
low-frequency range (f ≫ fc) are as follows:
(13.5)
(13.6)
Publisher Summary
This chapter discusses some fundamentals of chemistry. It discusses the four
fundamental laws of chemistry, that is, Law of Conservation of Mass, Law of
Constant Composition, Law of Multiple Proportions, and Law of Reciprocal
Proportions. It also describes the gas laws: (1) Boyle's Law, (2) Charles' Law, and
(3) Avogadro's Law. There are several definitions of acids and bases, but the one
that is particularly helpful is that of Bronstead–Lowry, who defined acids and
bases in terms of proton exchange. An acid is a substance existing as
molecules or ions that can donate a proton, that is, a proton donor. A base is a
molecule or ion that can accept a proton, that is, a proton acceptor. The
chapter further presents the dissociation of water. Pure water is a bad
conductor of electricity. The presence of small amounts of dissolved
substances, however, increases the conductance considerably. Neutralization
indicators are substances that dissociate in solution into two (or more)
differently coloured forms, the nature of the form present being governed by
the pH of the solution.
High-Transmission-Loss Construction
An important study was undertaken by Sharp (1973) to try to develop
construction methods that would achieve transmission loss ratings 20 dB or
more above the mass law prediction. In this work several techniques were
utilized, not normally seen in standard construction practice but which could
easily be implemented. These included spot lamination that has been
discussed previously, and point mounting. The point mounting technique he
devised used 1/4 inch (6 mm) thick foam tape squares between the gypboard
and the stud and attached the sheet with drywall screws through the tape. This
technique resulted in panel isolation that approaches the theoretical point
mounting discussed in Eq. 9.54. A triple-panel wall having an STC of 76
utilizing these techniques is shown in Fig. 10.12. This wall has a relatively low
transmission loss value of 33 dB in the 80 Hz band.
Figure 10.12. High-Transmission-Loss Wall Construction (California Office of Noise Control, 1981)
Figure 10.12 also shows a double-panel wall having the same mass as the
previous construction. It has a lower rating (STC 69) due to reduced
performance in the mid-frequencies but much better performance at low
frequencies (41 dB at 80 Hz). The multiple layers of spot-laminated drywall
significantly reduce the coincidence effects. Similar performance should be
obtained using separate double-stud construction assuming that flanking
paths have been controlled.
3.3. Fiteql
Model calculations and optimization of model constants were performed with
the nonlinear least squares optimization program FITEQL [25]. This program is
used to determine optimal sets of equilibrium reactions and mass law
constants to fit a particular set of equilibrium data. Details about the program
can be found in Refs. 18 and 25. The main indicator of the goodness of fit of a
particular model formulation (set of solution and surface reactions and
corresponding equilibrium constants) to a particular data set is the overall
variance VY, which is the weighted sum of squares of residuals divided by the
degrees of freedoms. Values of VY between 0.1 and 20 indicate a reasonably
good fit, with values around 1 being the best.
For each sorbing ion studied, sets of surface reactions were hypothesized and
incorporated in a version of FITEQL containing the Two-Layer Model. The
smallest set of reactions capable of fitting all available data with acceptable
goodness of fit was adopted. After individual fitting of all data sets for a
particular sorbing ion, with the same set of surface reactions in each case,
overall best estimates for the surface complexation constants were calculated
according to the method of Dzombak and Morel [18] as follows:
(12)
where wi is a weighting factor given by
(13)
and (σlogK)i is the standard deviation in log K calculated by FITEQL for the ith
data set. A set of confidence intervals was also calculated for the weighted
average of each surface complexation constant to indicate the uncertainty
associated with the best estimate. Additional details are provided in Dzombak