Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hilsdorf
Hilsdorf
Hilsdorf
223
224 Hilsdorf, Kropp, and Koch
1 • PIDBLEM STATEMENT
2. 1 Neutron Radiation
4.1 Introduction
The experimental data vary over a wide range even for a given
19 2
neutron fluence. For a neutron fluence of 5 x 1o n/an the strength
ratios range fran o. 72 < fcu/fcuo < 1.o5 and o.65 < fcu/fcuT < 1.o5.
'l'he cause of this significant scatter of experimental data as well as
the parameters which affect the resistance of concrete against neutron
radiation will be treated in more detail in section 4.2.3.
values vary over a wide range: for a neutron fluence of 5 x 1o19 n/cm2
the observed strength ratios range between the following limits:
o.2o < fru/fruo < o.82 and o.33< fru/fruT < o.98.
4.2.3 Parameters which Influence the Resistance of Concrete against
Nuclear Radiation
The large scatter observed in the experimentel data reported sofar
can with all likelihood be attributed to differences in the composition
of the concrete samples, in the concrete making materials and in test
procedures. In the following sections an attempt will be made to
analyze the effect of these parameters.
4.2.3.1 Slow and fast neutrons--In the various investigations
reported sofar slow as well as fast neutrons have been employed.
Therefore, in Figs. 2 through 6 different symbols representing the
test data have been used depending on the type of neutron radiation:
filled symbols for slow neutrons, empty symbols for fast neutrons, and
half-filled symbols where no separation between fast and slow neutrons
was possible.
Is was generally expected that fast neutron radiation would lead
to a more pronounced radiation damage than slow neutrons. However, this
is not supported by the data given in Figs. 2 through 6. In contrast
to this test data reported in (27) show that all other parameters being
equal fast neutrons are indeed more detrimental than slow neutrons.
4.2.3.2 Type of aggregates--Radiation experiments in which the
type of aggregate was varied are reported in (1, 2o, 22). All investiga-
tors came to the conclusion that different types of aggregates lead to
concrete with different resistance against neutron radiation. In (22)
mortar specimens made with different aggregates showed the following
strength ratios after exposure to a neutron radiation of
19 2
8 x 1o n/an •
Type of aggregate Strength ratio
fcu/fcuo
Baryte o.69
Magnetite o.78
Hollith
(light weight aggregate) 1.00
In (2o) it was reported that the resistance of a particular type
of aggregate against neutron radiation can be related to volume changes
of the aggregate and the concrete during radiation. This observation
will be delt with in more detail in sections 4.4.1 and 4.7.1.
4.2.3.3 Mix proportions and type of cement--In (2) the flexural
strength of mortar specimens made of different mix proportions was
determined after neutron exposure. The experiments indicate that the
lean mixes were less radiation resistant than the rich mixes. However,
230 Hilsdorf, Kropp, and Koch
it was shown that damage had been caused primarily by the temperature
exposure. No further experiments are available on the effect of mix
proportions on the resistance of concrete against neutron radiation.
4.5.2 Creep
4. 7. 1 Studies on Aggregates
city of the aggregates was observed (14, 2o, 24). It is likely that
these changes in mechanical properties are caused by the same structu-
ral changes of the aggregates which caused the volume increase as
described above.
In (14) tests on cement paste samples are reported which were made
of high alumina cement. In (2o, 24) tests on portland cement paste
samples are described. All investigators observed that the cement
paste samples exhibit shrinkage strains when exposed to neutron radia-
tion which are identical to the shrinkage strains of temperature ex-
posed samples. This can also be seen fran the experiments shown in Fig.
12. According to (2o) the volume decrease of the cement paste samples
is proportional to the simultaneously oc=ing weight loss. Tensile
and canpressive strength as well as the mcxlulus of elasticity of the
cement paste samples change little as a consequence of nuclear radia-
tion.
6. CCNCLUSICNS
7. LIST OF REFERENCFS
(4) Blosser, T.V.; Bond, G.W.; Lee, L.A.; Morgan, D.T.; Reid, R.C.;
Reynolds, A.B.; Speidel, T.O.P.; Vroan, D.W. and Welt, M.A.,
"A Study of the Nuclear and Physical Properties of the ORNL Gra-
phite Reactor Shield", oak Ridge National Laboratory, 36 pp., 1959.
(6) Browne, R.D. and Blundell, R., "The Behavior of Concrete in Pre-
stressed Concrete Vessels", First International Conference on
Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Nuclear Engineering
and Design 2o, North-Holland Publishing Company, pp. 429-475, 1972.
(7) carrpbell-Allen, D.; IJ:M, E.W. and R::>per, H., "An Investigation of
the Effect of Elevated Temperatures on Concrete for Reactor Ves-
sels", Nuclear Structural Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 382-388,
Oct. 1965.
(16) Elleuch, M.F. and Dubois, F., "Les Experiences d'Irradiation des
Betons et de leurs Constituants", Carrnission of the European Can-
munities, pp. 71-96, 1972.
(19) Grantham, W.J., "A Study of Concrete Samples taken fran the Top
Shield of the ORNL Graphite Reactor", Oak Ridge National Labora-
tory, pp. 244-246, 196o.
(2o) Gray, B.S., "The Effect of Reactor Radiation on Cements and Con-
crete" , Ccrumission of the European Catmuni ties, LuxE!llbourg,
pp. 17-39, 1972.
(28) Price, B.T.; Horton, C.C. and Spinney, K.T., "Radiation Shielding",
International Series of MJnograph on Nuclear Energy, Pergarron
Press, New York, London, Paris, pp. 276-278, 1957.
(31) StOces, B.; otopal, P.; Juricka, V. and Gabriel, J., "The Effect
of Radiation on the Mechanical Properties of Concrete" , Ceskoslo-
venska Akademie, Translated fran the Czech; Oak Ridge National
Laboratory, Purchase Order: 34B-83481, Letter Release No.: T81,
STS No.: 14o87.
(32) Walker, R.L. and Grotenhuis, M., "A Sumnary of Shielding Con-
stants for Concrete", Argonne National Laboratory, USA, ANL-6443,
Nov. 1961.
1\)
:I:~ A
1- 0 0
<!'
zw
a: 140
t;
w
>
c;;
/ .. -··-··- ............
..........
-
/ ........
UJ
w 100
a: -- ·........
c.. 1\,~-- --~ portland~~......_ . ......_ .. heat resistant concrete
:I:
::::!!:
0
(.)
_l !"' . cement concrete ----.........
..........
., ........... !/1
c.
0
........
"'
a
"'C
"'C
0
ce~crete I 11 I»
llll
(.) :I
~ c.
1111
I ~
w
> "'
0
(')
~
20 t- ':1'
...J '- l....i....l....
w
a: -
0 200 400 600 800 1000
TEMPERATURE, oc
Fig. 1:
Compressive Strength of Concrete as Function of Temperature
(Campbell - Allen et. al. 7 )
Slow Neutrons: Fast Neutrons:
• Alexander ( 1 ) o Elleuch ( 14)
fcu/fcuo • Price ( 28) 6 Houben ( 22)
v Stoces (31)
1,4
No Information:
1,2 [J
Batten ( 2)
r.----_ ~
Dubrovskij ( 13)
z
c:::
• ...........
1,0
• •
0 ...... ~
•
~ ......
CD
• ...
I»
0,8
-o- • 00
-:....4.... ~
::tJ
I»
c.
0,6 1--....
-.............
~ ......
............... ~ r-.~
-
iii"
c;·
::I
0,4 -..... r--~
-
m
0,2
FLUENCE OF
NEUTRON
-
CD
(")
( I)
RADIATION, n;cm 2
Fig. 2:
Compressive Strength of Concrete Exposed to Neutron Radiation
feu Related to Strength of Untreated Concrete fcuo
Slow Neutrons: Fast Neutrons: ~
1\.)
• Alexander ( 1 ) o Elleuch ( 14 )
fcu/fcuT ' Price (28) 6 Houben ( 22)
Stoces (31)
1,4
No Information:
1,2 A Batten ( 2 )
:I:
A - .... Dubrovskij ( 13 )
1,0 (/1
c.
0,8
•• •
..
A
~!-... -a
0
....
A
0 0 .......... ::::-;:
0,6
~
r-. ~
'tJ
'tJ
I»
0,4 ::l
c.
::::-;:
0,2 0
n
FLUENCE OF ~
NEUTRON
1018 2 5 10 19 2 5 1020 2 5 10 21 2
RADIATION, n/cm 2
Fig. 3:
Compressive Strength of Concrete Exposed to Neutron Radiation
feu, Related to Strength of Temperature Exposed Concrete fcuT
fcu/fcuo
1,33
0,6 ~----<~------------____,___--------' z
c
INNER OUTER n
CD
SURFACE SURFACE I»
....
0,4 ~--t-----------------;---------. ::D
I»
Q.
0,2 ~---1---------------1--__j
-o·
I»
::I
m
-
I 1ft= I· Sft= ·I· 1ft= ·I
DISTANCE FROM
EXPOSED SURFACE
n
-
CD
f/1
1,2
B~
::I:
(/1
Q.
1,0
0,8
"k B I B~ -a"
0
~
\ f B t\ '0
'0
0,6
0,4
\l 4 4 IBm ~
I»
::I
Q.
"
0,2 f\·: I 0 '
0
n
:::T
1018
L 2 5 1019 2 5 10 20 2
FLUENCE OF
NEUTRON
RADIATION, n/cm 2
Fig. 5:
Tensile Strength of Concrete Exposed to Neutron Radiation fru,
Related to Strength of Untreated Concrete fruo
o Elleuch ( 14) Fast Neutrons ( f .n.)
• Gray (20) Limestone Aggregate ( f.n.)
fru/fruT • Gray (20) Flint Aggregate ( f.n.)
.. Batten { 2 ) No Information
1,4 ...
1,2
'""" K
:lJ
0,8 I»
.. "'\ ~
0,6
\
~0:: :~,
0 "
-o·
I»
\ :::1
OIJ
K -m
..
A A
0,4
0,2
\
' FLUENCE OF
-
a>
0
en
NEUTRON
1018 2 5 1019 2 5 1020 2
RADIATION, n/cm 2
Fig. 6 :
Tensile Strength of Concrete Exposed to Neutron Radiation fru,
I\)
Related to Strength of Temperature Exposed Concrete fruT J::o
CJ1
1\)
• Alexander ( 1 ) } J::o
en
• Sommers (30) Compression
fcu/fcuo
A Gray (20) Tension
1,2
•
1,0
•
:I:
(I)
Q.
0,8 0
::l.
0,6 "a
"C
"C
0,4 ·- I»
::l
Q.
0,2 "
0
(')
Y' - RADIATION -=
109 2 5 1010 2 5 1011 2 DOSE , rd
Fig. 7:
Compressive and Tensile Strength of Concrete Exposed to
y- Radiation feu, Related to Strength of Untreated Concrete fcuo
VOLUME
INCREASE, 0 /o
5
0
4 z
c
~-
,;1' n
flint aggregate,./" CD"
3
,""' 0 ...
I»
::JJ
0 !--""' I»
.,., ........ a.
2
-
0
iii'
---
oo.,-'
...... 0 &
0 0
~----
1 -..-- ::l
-1 NEUTRON
0 1 2 3 4 x1019
RADIATION, n/cm 2
Fig. 8:
Volume Change of Concrete Specimens Exposed to Fast
Neutrons According to Gray (20) and Kelly et. al. (24)
• Alexander ( 1 ) s. n.
" Dubrovskij (13) no information
0 Gray ( 20) f . n.
IJ. Houben (22) f. n.
1,4
0 v. d. Schaaf (29) f. n.
1,2 v Stoces (31) f. n.
1,0 C/1
c c.
b~
0
oo 0
0 :::l.
0,8
......... v
...... ··• <>-
--- ------
0
I----.. <>.
0,6
0,4
0,2
5 1019 2 5 10 20 2 5 1021 2
FLUENCE OF NEUTRON RADIATION, n/cm 2
Fig. 9:
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete After Neutron Radiation Ec,
Related to Modulus of Elasticity of Untreated Concrete Eco
Dose Rate : 11,4 x 10 3 rd I h
CD
I
0
,.. 300
><
z creep, untreated
<
a: 10 N/mm 2 ( 1420 psi)
t-
en z
c
200 v ~
It)
...I»
lJ
I»
c.
100 r-~~~----~------------~------------~------------~
-s·
I»
:I
shrinkage, irradiated --
m
I t)
(')
~~~ shrinkage' I
( I)
0
• • .~ ! 0untreate~
~
100 200 300 400
DURATION OF LOADING, DAYS
Fig. 10:
Effect of '(-Radiation on Creep of Concrete According to ~
~
Me Dowall (25) , All Specimens Sealed CD
~
0
o Flint Aggregate
c Limestone Aggregate
Kc/Kco x Light Weight Aggregate
1,0
:I:
Ul
0,8 Q.
0,6
0
[]0
0
oo
Xc
X "
~
0[]
-a"...
0
[]
[] "C
0 "C
0,4 I»
:I
Q.
0,2
FLUENCE OF ":::r
0
n
NEUTRON
0 1 2 3 4x1019
RADIATION, n/cm 2
Fig. 11:
Thermal Conductivity of Concrete After Neutron Radiation Kc,
Related to Thermal Conductivity of Untreated Concrete Kco ( 20 J
o Serpentine Aggregate
Radiated
• Serpentine Aggregate
Temperature Treated
--
+8 "' Cement Paste Radiated
0 0
& Cement Paste
~
0 0
0 +6 n
at 20°C, 60% R. H.
~
~
(!) 0
~ +4
0
0
0
0 • Cement Paste z
c:::
...I
Temperature Treated 2.
...I
UJ q,> V .......-b'o
0
0
CD
3: +2 , 0
...
ll.l
CJ)
0
0
- -· -
::.:: -4 ..... CD
z • .......... • n
......... ..... (/1
a: -6 ••
J:
CJ)
-a
Fig. 12:
Volume Change of Aggregates and Hardened Cement Paste During
Radiation with Fast Neutrons According to Elleuch et. al. (14)