Icc Presentation

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 160

Summer Term 2023

Intercultural Communication

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase www.bw.eah-jena.de


Version: 14.04.2023
Why Intercultural Communication?

Introduction
Introduction Increasing international
Communication business interdependencies
Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication Culturally adequate relationship with staff and
Culture customers confers competitive advantages
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
Increasing quality requirements on
Hall’s Studies
international cooperation
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation Larger number of


multicultural teams

No. 2

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Thomas (2005).
Personal Introduction

Introduction
Introduction

Communication
 Name
Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal  Semester and course of study


Communication

 Country of origin
Culture

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies
 International experience
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies
 Area of expertise
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 3

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Examination Proceedings

Introduction
Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication
 Alternative examination, consisting of two requirements:
Nonverbal
Communication
− Written examination (multiple choice test)
Culture  50 per cent of final grade
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies − Presentation of the cultural characteristics of the chosen country


Hofstede’s Studies  50 per cent of final grade
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies  The selected country must not represent the culture in which you
Schwartz’ Studies
have grown up or have been socialised!
GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 4

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Presentation

Content:
Introduction
Introduction
 Cultural-communicative characteristics and idiosyncrasies of a selected
Communication
country compared with Germany
Verbal
Communication  Underlying culture-influencing conditions (no general regional studies)
Nonverbal
linked with theoretical foundations and concepts
Communication
 Dos and Don’ts in communication and social interaction, illustrated by
Culture
practical examples
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
Form:
Hall’s Studies
 Maximum 10 slides (including title and closing slides, no duplication by
animations)
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies
 Time of presentation 15 minutes
GLOBE Study  No videos allowed
Cultural Adaptation  No written notes or records
 Font size minimum 18 pt Arial, other fonts with analogue size allowed
 Full names on title page, numeration on each slide
 References in Harvard style on each slide, e.g. „(Schmidt, 2007)“
No. 5
 Upload in Moodle as MSPowerPoint file
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Hotspots of Intercultural Communication

− Welcoming and greetings (verbal, gestural, handshakes, gender


Introduction
Introduction aspects, hugging, kissing, on the phone)
Communication − Titles and names (first name/surname, title, polite form)
Verbal
Communication − Presentation und small talk (Who presents?, business cards, themes
Nonverbal
und topics, personal questions)
Communication
− Conversation (eye contact, intonation, pauses, interruptions, silence,
Culture
speaker change, eye contact, gestures, haptic, proxemics, humour)
Stereotypes
− (In-)Directness (Saying ‘No’, implicitness, praising, criticisms, gestures)
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies − Apologising (When?, How?, nonverbal, ad hoc-formulations)


Hall’s Studies
− Business Meetings (dress code, punctuality, small talk, seating
Trompenaars’ Studies arrangements, duration)
Schwartz’ Studies
− Lunches and dinners (use of cutlery, toasts, sharing table, Who pays?)
GLOBE Study
− Private Invitations (seriousness, punctuality, gifts)
Cultural Adaptation

− Gifts (What?, When?, To whom?, How to hand over?


When to open?)

− Gender relations (gender roles, relationship between


men and women, compliments)
No. 6

− Concept of time (punctuality, delays)


Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Enrolment and Inscription

Introduction
Introduction

Communication Lectures
Verbal Friday, 14 April 2023, 11:30-15:30
Friday, 21 April 2023, 11:30-15:30
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication Friday, 28 April 2023, 11:30-15:30
Culture Friday, 05 May 2023, 11:30-15:30
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies
Inscription at Moodle course ID 140
Hofstede’s Studies
and registering for one country
Hall’s Studies

Upload of Presentations (MS Powerpoint format) by


Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies
Thursday, 01 June 2023, 23:59
GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

Friday, 02 June 2023, 11:30-19:00


 Multiple choice test
 Presentations and discussions
No. 7

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Countries

Argentina
Introduction
Introduction
Australia
Communication
Brazil
Verbal
Communication
Canada
Nonverbal
China
Communication
France
Culture Germany
Stereotypes India
Cultural Studies Indonesia
Hofstede’s Studies Italy
Hall’s Studies
Japan
Trompenaars’ Studies
Mexico
Schwartz’ Studies
Nigeria
Russia
GLOBE Study
Saudi Arabia
Cultural Adaptation
South Africa
South Korea
Spain
Turkey
No. 8 United Kingdom
United States
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Evaluation and Grading

Introduction
Introduction
Weighting
Communication
Multiple Choice Test (per cent)
Verbal 50 yes/no (dichotomous) questions, to be answered in 45
Communication
50
minutes (wrong answers will lead to point deduction)
Nonverbal
Communication
Weighting
Culture
Presentation (per cent)
Stereotypes Content, task solution, accuracy 10
Cultural Studies
Structure, systematisation, comprehensibility, linking theory-
10
Hofstede’s Studies practice
Hall’s Studies
Layout and arrangement of information, legibility, grammar and
10
Trompenaars’ Studies spelling, references
Schwartz’ Studies Posture, gesture, facial expression, appearance, visual
10
GLOBE Study contact, way and speed of speaking, speaking without notes
Cultural Adaptation Compliance with time (+/-10 per cent tolerance range, then +/-1
10
minute = -1 point)
Total 100

No. 9

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Structure

Introduction
Introduction
1. Concept and Models of Communication
Communication

Verbal 2. Verbal Communication


Communication

Nonverbal 3. Nonverbal Communication


Communication

Culture 4. Concept and Models of Culture


Stereotypes
5. Stereotypes
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
6. Comparative Cultural Studies
Hall’s Studies 7. Studies by Hofstede
Trompenaars’ Studies
8. Studies by Hall
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study 9. Studies by Trompenaars


Cultural Adaptation
10. Studies by Schwartz
11. GLOBE Study
12. Cultural Adaptation
No. 10

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Literature

General readings (available at the EAH Jena Library):


Introduction
Introduction
Lewis, Richard D. 2010. When cultures collide: leading across cultures, 3rd ed.,
Communication Boston/London: Brealey.
Verbal Hofstede, Geert; Hofstede, Gert Jan; Minkov, Michael. 2010. Cultures and
Communication
organizations: Software of the mind, 3rd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nonverbal
Communication Hall, Edward T.; Hall; Mildred Reed. 1996. Understanding cultural differences:
Culture
Germans, French and Americans, Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.
Young, Robert E. 1996. Intercultural communication: Pragmatics, genealogy,
Stereotypes
deconstruction, Clevedon/Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
General readings (available at the ThULB):
Hall’s Studies
 http://www.thulb.uni-jena.de, keyword “intercultural” …
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies Country-specific readings:


GLOBE Study Schmidt, Patrick L. 2007. In search of intercultural understanding: A practical
Cultural Adaptation guidebook for living and working across cultures. Wien: Meridian World Press.
Acuff, Frank L. 2008. How to negotiate anything with anyone anywhere around
the world. 3rd ed., New York: Amacom Books.
Morrison, Terri; Conaway, Wayne A. 2006. Kiss bow or shake hands: The
bestselling guide to doing business in more than 60 countries. 2nd ed., Avon
No. 11
(MA): Adams.
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Concept and Models of Communication

Introduction

Communication
Communication Communication Process
Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication
 Requires at least two actors (sender, recipient)
Culture
 Material or energetic transmitting of signs
Stereotypes  Sign are related to meanings
Cultural Studies  Similar cognitions (knowledge, experience etc.) are necessary in order
Hofstede’s Studies to derive expectations and confer those signs a meaning
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies  Communication is the actual basis of all social interaction!


Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study
 Communication = interaction, comprehension, notification, transmission
Cultural Adaptation

No. 12

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Schugk (2014), Heringer (2014).
Communication Process by Lasswell

Introduction

Lasswell Formula
Communication
Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture
Who Says what In which To whom With what
channel effect
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies Communi- Message Medium Receiver Effect


Hofstede’s Studies cator
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies  Linear and mono-directional communication model


GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 13

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Lasswell (1948).
Types of information by Krippendorff

Introduction

Communication
Communication Noise (unintentional information)
Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture Channel
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies
Transinformation (intended and
Hofstede’s Studies
relevant information)
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

Equivocation (information loss)

No. 14

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Krippendorf (1986).
Communication Model by Herrmann

Introduction
Sender Intention Recipient
Communication
Communication
Stocks of meanings Stocks of meanings
Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Sequence of Sequence of

meaning (decoding)
meanings meanings
Assignment signs-

Assignment signs-
Communication
meaning (coding)

Culture

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies
Sequence message Sequence
of signs of signs
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation
Stocks of signs interference Stocks of signs

Problems
 Different contexts and different meaning of signs
No. 15  Communication in foreign languages caused by culture depending, different
sign-meaning-assignments!
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Source: Schugk (2014).
Example: Influence of Culture on Signs (1)

Introduction

Communication
Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 16

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Example: Influence of Culture on Signs (2)

Europe
Introduction

Communication
Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies
Reading direction
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies
Arabic Regions
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 17
Reading direction
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Example: Influence of Culture on Signs (3)

Introduction

Communication
Communication  Ford „Comet“ in Mexico introduced as „Caliente“
Verbal
Communication
 Curling iron by Sunbeam established as „Mist Stick“ in Germany
Nonverbal
Communication

Culture  Ford „Pinto“ in Brasilia was marked as „Corcel“, Mitsubishi


Stereotypes „Pajero“ in Spanish-speaking regions as „Montero“
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
 the Egyptian airline „Misair“ failed in France
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies
 Mazda „Laputa“ (1991) flopped in Spanish-speaking regions
Schwartz’ Studies
(slogan „a lightweight, impact-absorbing body“)
GLOBE Study
 Toyota „MR2“ produced unintentional associations in France
Cultural Adaptation

 Starbucks used „Enjoy your morning Latte“ on advertisement


posters in Germany
No. 18

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Four-Sides Model by Schulz von Thun

Introduction

Communication
Communication
Factual information
Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication
Self-
Sender Message Appeal Recipient
Culture revelation
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
Relationship
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies
Four Layers (Sides):
1. The matter layer
GLOBE Study
2. The self-revealing
Cultural Adaptation
3. The relationship layer
4. The appeal

 Also known as ‘Communication Square’


No. 19

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Schugk (2014).
Example: Communication Square (1)

Introduction

Communication
Communication

Verbal
Communication Hey, the
Nonverbal traffic lights
Communication
are green! Factual information
Am I driving
Culture
or are you?
Stereotypes
message
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies
Self-
Trompenaars’ Studies Sender Appeal Receiver
revelation
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

Relationship

No. 20

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Schulz von Thun (1996).
Example: Communication Square (2)

Factual information „What I inform about“


Introduction
Sender gives clear data, facts and statements
Here: the fact that the traffic lights are green
Communication
Communication

Verbal
Self-revelation „What I reveal about myself“
Communication
Distinction between
Nonverbal
Communication − Conscious and intended self-revelation and
Culture
− Unintended self-revealing
Here: Sender is obviously German-speaking, able to see colours,
Stereotypes
awake and takes part internally; the sender is possibly in a hurry
Cultural Studies
Relationship „What I think about you and how we get along“
Hofstede’s Studies
Two kinds of messages on the relation side:
Hall’s Studies
a) You-messages: giving information about how the sender sees the receiver
Trompenaars’ Studies Here: potentially questioning the driving skills of the wife
Schwartz’ Studies b) We-messages: giving information on how the sender sees the relation
GLOBE Study
between him/her and the recipient
Here: possibly pointing out that the sender is the better driver
Cultural Adaptation

Appeal „What I want to make you do“


Influence on the recipient as a function of nearly all messages
− Open exertion of influence (advice)
No. 21 − Hidden influence (manipulation)
Here: e.g. making to drive faster, to drive more carefully etc.
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase Source: Schugk (2014).
Insights of the Communication Square

Introduction

Communication
Communication
1) Communication as four-dimensional matter (e.g. „I called you
Verbal
Communication five times!“)
Nonverbal
Communication

Culture 2) One and the same statement contains several messages


Stereotypes
(e.g. „Darling, the beer is all gone.“)
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies 3) Different weighting of the four aspects/square sides:


Hall’s Studies − Overemphasis of the factual aspects in job/school
Trompenaars’ Studies
− Strong dependence on the cultural context
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study
 All four aspects need to be considered in communication!
Cultural Adaptation

No. 22

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Schulz von Thun (1996).
Five Axioms of Communication by Watzlawick

Introduction

Communication
Communication 1. One cannot not communicate.
Verbal

2. Every communication has a content and


Communication

Nonverbal
Communication relationship aspect such that the latter
Culture classifies the former and is therefore
Stereotypes
a meta-communication.
Paul Watzlawick
Cultural Studies
3. The nature of a relationship is dependent (* 1921, † 2007)
Hofstede’s Studies
on the punctuation of the partners' communication
Hall’s Studies
procedures (communication is always cause and effect).
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies 4. Human communication involves both digital (verbal) and analogic
GLOBE Study (nonverbal) modalities.
Cultural Adaptation
5. Inter-human communication procedures are either symmetric
(equal) or complementary (subordinating), depending on whether
the relationship of the partners is based on differences or parity.

No. 23

Source: Watzlawick (1969).


Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Questions to Check for Learning

Introduction

Communication
Communication

Verbal 1. What is communication and what characterises the


Communication
communication process?
Nonverbal
Communication

Culture 2. Please explain the content and characteristics of


Stereotypes
communication models!
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
3. Which aspects contains a message? What conclusion can
Hall’s Studies
be drawn from this?
Trompenaars’ Studies
4. Which basic assumptions (axioms) underlie each type of
Schwartz’ Studies
interpersonal communication?
GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 24

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Verbal Communication

Introduction
 Existence of language as way of expression of verbal
Communication communication for approx. 100.000 years
Verbal
Verbal
Communication
Communication  Diversity of languages
Nonverbal
Communication − “Linguistic Survey of India”: in India 179 different
Culture languages and 544 dialects (Maletzke, 1996)
Stereotypes
− Today several thousand languages: between 2.790
Cultural Studies
(Dülfer, 1996) und approx. 8.000 languages worldwide
Hofstede’s Studies
(Spitzer, 2003)
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies
− Approx. 12.000 dialects (Dülfer, 1996)
Schwartz’ Studies  More than half of all humans has Mandarin, Hindi, English,
GLOBE Study Spanish or Russian as mother tongue
Cultural Adaptation
 Approx. 100 of the most spread languages are spoken by
95 per cent of the world’s population

No. 25

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Schugk (2014).
Most Spoken Languages

Native Second Total


Introduction Language Countries with most
Rank Language Speakers Lang. in Speakers
Family speakers
Communication in million million in million
Verbal
Verbal USA, Vereinigtes
Communication
Communication 1 Englisch indogermanisch 370 898 1.268
Königreich
Nonverbal
Communication Volksrepublik China,
2 Mandarin sinotibetisch 921 199 1.117
Culture
Taiwan

Stereotypes
3 Hindi indogermanisch 342 295 637 Indien
Mexiko, Kolumbien,
Cultural Studies 4 Spanisch indogermanisch 463 75 538
Spanien
Hofstede’s Studies
5 Französisch indogermanisch 77 199 280 Frankreich
Hall’s Studies
Ägypten, Algerien,
6 Hocharabisch afroasiatisch ... 274 274
Trompenaars’ Studies
Saudi-Arabien
Schwartz’ Studies
7 Bengalisch indogermanisch 228 37 265 Bangladesch, Indien
GLOBE Study 8 Russisch indogermanisch 154 104 258 Russland, GUS-Staaten
Cultural Adaptation 9 Portugiesisch indogermanisch 228 24 254 Brasilien, Portugal
10 Indonesisch austronesisch 44 155 199 Indonesien
11 Urdu indogermanisch 69 102 171 Pakistan, Indien
Deutschland, Österreich,
12 Hochdeutsch indogermanisch 76 56 132
No. 26
Schweiz

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: SIL International (2020).
Verbal Communication Elements

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Verbal Communication
Communication
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture
Nonverbal Verbal
Stereotypes
• Languages and Varieties
Cultural Studies
• Polite forms
Hofstede’s Studies
• Directness/Indirectness
Hall’s Studies
Vocalic/Paraverbal Nonvocalic • Explicitness/Implicitness
Trompenaars’ Studies
(Paralinguistic)
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study Body Language Material


Cultural Adaptation
(Kinesics) Artefacts

No. 27

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Sapir-Whorf-Theory

Introduction Interaction between language and world view within a culture


Communication or group:
Verbal
Verbal
Communication
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication 1) Language structures or determines perception and thinking
Culture
− The structure of a language affects the ways in which its
Stereotypes
respective speakers conceptualise their world
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
− “An individual can only think what its language allows him”
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies
2) Environmental experiences structure or determine the language
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study − The ‘real world’ contributes essentially to the language habits
Cultural Adaptation
− Strong linguistic differentiation of object areas in case of high
importance
− Existence of so-called ‘linguistic blanks’ in other languages
No. 28

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Schugk (2014).
Examples of Sapir-Whorf-Theory (1)

 more than 5.000 potato varieties in Peru…


Introduction
papa tarmeña
papa chanchán (rosada) papa
Communication
papa amarilla peruanita
Verbal
Verbal
Communication
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies papa morada


Hofstede’s Studies papa negra papa perricholi
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation papa huayro papa huamantanga


papa tomasa blanca

No. 29

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Examples of Sapir-Whorf-Theory (2)

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Verbal
 Many Arabic terms for ‘camel’, at the beginning of the 70s more than
Communication
Communication 6.000 terms, today clearly less terms owing to declined importance
Nonverbal
Communication
 Different terms for ‘Love’ in Greek language :
Culture
eros = sensual-physical love
Stereotypes philia = mental love
Cultural Studies agape = spiritual love
Hofstede’s Studies
storge = family love
Hall’s Studies
 Different concept of „Honour“ in Turkish language:
Trompenaars’ Studies
şeref = standing in society
Schwartz’ Studies onur = own honour
GLOBE Study
saygı = respect for the elderly and the parents
sadaka/vefa = loyalty to superiors and parents
Cultural Adaptation
namus = family honour, reputation in society

No. 30

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Systematic-Communicative Preferences

Introduction
 Description of application or use of language
Communication

Verbal
Verbal
Communication
Communication

Nonverbal
Systematic-Communicative Preferences by House
Communication

Culture
Directness Indirectness
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies Explicitness Implicitness


Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation
Ad-hoc formulation Linguistic routines

Example: Germany Examples: USA, China


No. 31

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Schugk (2014).
Directness vs. Indirectness

Introduction
Directness scale by House and Kasper
Communication
Category Level of directness Examples
Verbal
Verbal
We don’t want any crowding (as a
Communication
Communication
1. Mild hints
Nonverbal
Hints request to move the car).
Communication
2. Strong hints You’ve left the kitchen in a right mess.
Culture
Could you clean up the kitchen, please?
Stereotypes
Conventionally 3. Query preparatory Would you mind moving your car?
indirect
Cultural Studies
4. Suggestory formulae How about cleaning up?
Hofstede’s Studies
I want you to move your car.
5. Want statement
Hall’s Studies I would like you to clean the kitchen.
Trompenaars’ Studies 6. Obligation statements You’ll have to move your car.
Schwartz’ Studies
7a. Hedged performatives I would like to ask you to move your car.
GLOBE Study Impositives
I’m asking you to move your car.
Cultural Adaptation 7b. Performatives
I am asking you to clean up the kitchen.
Move your car!
8. Mood derivable
Clean up the kitchen!

No. 32

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Sources: House and Kasper (1981), Schugk (2014).
Use of Directness Levels

Directness of German and Dutch Managers


Introduction
40
3. Query preparatory:
Communication
“Could you make the
Verbal
Verbal
35 contract, please?” 6. Obligation
Communication
Communication
statement:
30 “You‘ll have
Use (per cent)

Nonverbal
Communication
to make the
Culture 25 contract!”
Stereotypes
20
German
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies 15 Dutch


Hall’s Studies
10
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies 5

GLOBE Study
0
Cultural Adaptation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Directness levels

Modality markers:
 Hesitators, i.e. specific used hesitating, stuttering etc.
 Understaters, i.e. using ‘soft’ adverbs, e.g. „a little bit“, „a bit“, „a moment“
No. 33

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Niehaus-Lohberg/Herrlitz (1994).
Examples: (In-)Directness in Germany and China

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Verbal
Communication
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 34

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Liu (2015).
Exercise: Direct and Indirect Communication

Put the following phrases in order from “least direct” to “most indirect”.
Introduction
( You want somebody to pick up your clothes at the dry-cleaners.)
Communication

Verbal
Verbal
Communication
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture
Please pick up my clothes.
Stereotypes
Get my
Cultural Studies
clothes. Could you possibly get my clothes?
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies
I was wondering if you
Trompenaars’ Studies could pick up my clothes Would it bother you if I asked
Schwartz’ Studies you to pick up my clothes?
GLOBE Study Don’t you think it’s time we
Cultural Adaptation picked up my clothes? Where do you think my clothes are?

Have my clothes been picked up yet?

Also remember, the tone of voice can be determinant – the longer phrases could
No. 35
sound sarcastic and ironic and the shorter ones could be said extremely polite.
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Example: British Indirect Communication

What the British say What the British mean What others understand
Introduction I disagree and do not want to discuss
I hear what you say. He accepts my point of view.
it further.
Communication
With the greatest respect… I think you are an idiot. He is listening to me.
Verbal
Verbal That’s not bad. That’s good. That’s poor.
Communication
Communication
That is a very brave proposal. You are insane. He thinks I have courage.
Nonverbal Quite good. A bit disappointing. Quite good.
Communication
Do it or be prepared to justify Think about the idea, but do what
I would suggest…
Culture yourself. you like.
Stereotypes The primary purpose of our
By the way/incidentally… That is not very important.
discussion is…
Cultural Studies
I was a bit disappointed that… I am annoyed that… It really doesn’t matter.
Hofstede’s Studies Very interesting. That is clearly nonsense. They are impressed.
Hall’s Studies
I’ll bear it in mind. I’ve forgotten it already. They will probably do it.
I’m sure it’s my fault. It’s your fault. Why do they think it was their fault?
Trompenaars’ Studies
It’s not an invitation, I’m just being
You must come for dinner sometime. I will get an invitation soon.
Schwartz’ Studies polite.
I almost agree. I don’t agree at all. He’s not far from agreement.
GLOBE Study
I only have a few minor comments. Please re-write completely. He has found a few typos.
Cultural Adaptation
Could we consider some other
I don’t like your idea. They have not yet decided.
options.
Correct me if I’m wrong. I’m right, don’t contradict me. I may be wrong, please let me know.
I’m not prepared to do that. I will never do that. He’ll do it in a day or two.
I feel sorry for him, really. I’d like to kill him. He has some sympathy for him.
No. 36 Are you sure you are right? I am convinced you’ve got it wrong! He’s almost convinced that I’m right.
Please think about that some more. It’s a bad idea: don’t do it. It’s a good idea: keep developing it.
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase That is an original point of view. You must be crazy. They like my ideas!
Exercise: Indirect Communication

Introduction

Communication Think about how to communicate the following in an indirect form!


Verbal
Verbal
Communication
Communication 1. Saying No: In the evening, a friend asks if you could go to the supermarket
Nonverbal and buy a bread for supper. He has too much to do and doesn’t want to go for
Communication
himself. (You reject politely.)
Culture

Stereotypes 2. Criticise: A colleague doesn’t attach importance to the clothing order and
Cultural Studies
wears a polo-neck jumper instead of a shirt. (You point out his misbehaviour to
him politely.)
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies 3. Make a request: For dealing with an important and urgent task your fellow
Trompenaars’ Studies student promised to send you a very useful link. (You ask him to give you the
Schwartz’ Studies
link as soon as possible.)
GLOBE Study
4. Express contrary opinion: You discuss a topic with a group. The previous
Cultural Adaptation speaker who has no idea in your eyes, holds an opinion that is contradictory to
yours. (Now you explain your argument.)

No. 37

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Assel (2009).
Examples: Explicitness vs. Implicitness (1)

Titles of movies
Introduction
Airplane (2000)
Communication
¡Aterriza como puedas! (ES) / ¿Y dónde está el piloto? (LA)
Verbal
Verbal
Communication
Communication Die unglaubliche Reise in einem verrückten Flugzeug
Nonverbal
Communication
Bridget Jones’ Diary (2001)
Culture
El diario de Bridget Jones
Stereotypes
Bridget Jones - Schokolade zum Frühstück
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
Groundhog Day (1993)
Hall’s Studies
El Día de la Marmota
Trompenaars’ Studies Und täglich grüßt das Murmeltier
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study
It’s Complicated (2009)
Cultural Adaptation Enamorado de mi Ex
Wenn Liebe so einfach wäre

Mrs. Doubtfire (1993)


No. 38 Papá por siempre
Mrs. Doubtfire - Das stachelige Kindermädchen
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Examples: Explicitness vs. Implicitness (2)

Introduction

Communication
Bans on smoking
Verbal
Verbal
Communication
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture Zur Vermeidung von Gesundheitsschäden und unzumutbaren


Stereotypes
Belästigungen ist in den Hallen, Fluren, Treppenhäusern und
Veranstaltungsräumen dieses Gebäudes mit Ausnahme der
Cultural Studies
Cafeteria und der Eingangshalle das Rauchen untersagt!
No Smoking!
Hofstede’s Studies
(In order to avoid damages to health and unreasonable
Hall’s Studies disturbances, smoking is forbidden in halls, corridors,
Trompenaars’ Studies
stairwells and event rooms of this building except for the
cafeteria and the entrance hall!)
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 39

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Ad-hoc Formulations vs. Linguistic Routines

Introduction Bitte entschuldigen Sie


Communication

Verbal
Verbal
Communication
Communication Pardon
Nonverbal
Communication

Culture Darf ich bitte kurz stören


Stereotypes

Cultural Studies
Ich möchte nicht stören vs. Excuse me
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies Entschuldigen Sie die Störung


Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study
Entschuldigung
Cultural Adaptation

Verzeihen Sie bitte die Störung

No. 40
Verzeihung
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Culture-Specific Openings of Conversation

Introduction
Germany Formal introduction, quite immediately starting shop talk

Communication

Verbal
Verbal
Communication
Communication Finland Formal introduction, drinks, afterwards shop talk
Nonverbal
Communication

USA Relaxed introduction, small talk, drinks and


Culture
snacks, then shop talk
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies Formal introduction, 10 minutes small talk


UK about sport, weather etc., then shop talk
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies
Formal introduction, ca. 15 minutes small talk
Trompenaars’ Studies France
about politics, art etc., then shop talk
Schwartz’ Studies
Formal introduction, taking stipulated seats,
GLOBE Study
Japan ca. 15-20 minutes small talk, starting shop talk
Cultural Adaptation after indication by highest-ranked person

Spain / Italy ca. 20-30 minutes small


talk, starting after gradual
arrival of participants
No. 41 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Source: Schugk (2014).
Questions to Check for Learning

Introduction

Communication
1. Explain the interaction between language and culture!
Verbal
Verbal
Communication
Communication 2. What does the Sapir-Whorf-Theory stand for?
Nonverbal
Communication
3. Which systematic-communicative preferences come
Culture across in the intercultural communication?
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies
4. Describe the phenomena ‘Directness’ and
Hofstede’s Studies
‘Indirectness’ for communication!

5. Explain the phenomenon ‘Explicitness’ and


Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies
‘Implicitness’ for communication!
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study 6. What are ‘Ad-hoc formulations’?


Cultural Adaptation
7. How do openings of conversations differ in the
various cultural contexts?

No. 42

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Nonverbal Communication

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Nonverbal
Communication
Communication

Culture

Stereotypes
Nonverbal communication …
Cultural Studies  happens along with verbal communication and is overwhelmingly
Hofstede’s Studies unconscious
 some elements can be controlled, some cannot
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies  is valuated, but usually not commented


GLOBE Study
 is often ambiguous and diffuse, allowing space for interpretation
Cultural Adaptation

 is particularly relevant to show feelings, namely, something that is


difficult or impossible to express verbally
 differs considerably according to the cultural context (e.g., highly
No. 43 important in Arabic and Latin cultures)
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase Adapted from: Heringer (2014).
Nonverbal Communication Elements

Introduction
Communication
Communication

Verbal
Communication
Nonverbal Verbal
Nonverbal
Nonverbal
Communication
Communication

Culture
Vocalic/paraverbal Nonvocalic
Stereotypes
(Paralinguistic)
Cultural Studies
• Intonation
Hofstede’s Studies
• Accentuation
Hall’s Studies
Body Language Material Artefacts
• Volume (Kinesics)
Trompenaars’ Studies • Belonging to the physical
• Pauses • Mimic appearance
Schwartz’ Studies
• Turn-taking and • Eye contact • Taken for personal use
GLOBE Study
overlapping
Cultural Adaptation • Gesture • Used as stimuli in the
• Proxemics communication process
• Posture
• Haptic
No. 44

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Schugk (2014).
Critical Incident: Paralinguistic Communication

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication
British employees eating at the airport cafeteria and the new Pakistani and Indian cafeteria
Nonverbal
Nonverbal
Communication
Communication
employees became angry with each other. The British employees accused the Pakistani
and Indian cafeteria workers of being rude. British English speakers would have offered
Culture gravy with rising intonation in a way that sounds to them like a question: “Gravy?” The
Stereotypes Pakistani and Indian women, however, following their own cultural convention offered the
gravy with falling intonation. This sounded to the British English speakers like a statement:
Cultural Studies
“Gravy” or “This is gravy,” although the Pakistani and Indian women intended to be politely
Hofstede’s Studies offering the gravy.
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 45

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Gumperz (1982).
Paralinguistic Communication (1)

Intonation:
- Voice variation
Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication
Germanic
Nonverbal
Nonverbal
Communication
Communication

Culture
Romance
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies Sino-Tibetan


Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies
Source: Schugk (2014).
Schwartz’ Studies - E.g.: German language
GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

Question Statement Command


 Sentence intonation matters, so that statements can even be
No. 46
interpreted as questions or commands
Source: Heringer (2014).
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Paralinguistic Communication (2)

Introduction

Communication Accentuation:
Verbal
Communication − (lat.) accentus = sound, tone, accentuation
Nonverbal
Nonverbal
Communication
Communication
− Contrastive highlighting of important communicative parts when
speaking
Culture

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies Volume (of the spoken word):


Hofstede’s Studies − Cultural differences in loudness (Asia < Europe <
Hall’s Studies Arabia/Africa/Latin America)
Trompenaars’ Studies
− Loudness in Europe is sometimes interpreted as impolite and
Schwartz’ Studies offensive
GLOBE Study
− Loudness as an instrument of role change from recipient to
Cultural Adaptation
communicator, also as a sign of interest and emotional
engagement (e.g. in Arabian and African cultures)

No. 47

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Schugk (2014).
Paralinguistic Communication (3)

Introduction

Communication Pauses, turn-taking and overlapping


Verbal
Communication
− Long pauses in certain cultures and languages (e.g. Finland)
Nonverbal
Nonverbal − Interruptions are in some cultures seen as impolite (e.g. Germany),
Communication
in other cultures as a sign of interest and enthusiasm (e.g. Latin
Communication

Culture
languages)
Stereotypes
− Turn-taking in German language only at end of a sentence (as
verbs are an important information medium are placed at end of
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
sentence), in other cultures (e.g. Latin languages) already in middle
Hall’s Studies
of a sentence
− Number of words and talkativeness is culturally conditioned (e.g.
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies
rather low in Japan and Finland)
GLOBE Study
− Silence and pauses in conversations have different meanings (e.g.
more negative in North America, Germany, South Europe, Arabia,
Cultural Adaptation

more positive in China, Japan and Finland)

No. 48

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Schugk (2014).
Mimic and Eye Contact

 Mimic as description of processes in the area of the face, e.g. cry,


Introduction
laugh etc.
Communication
 Culture-specific meaning of mimic
Verbal
Communication
 E.g. ‘smile’
Nonverbal
Nonverbal
Communication
Communication − Western countries: (in principle) association with joke, happiness
Culture and good mood
Stereotypes − Asia: apology, clarification of misunderstanding, sign of confusion,
Cultural Studies insecurity or embarrassment, possibility to avoid loss of face in
Hofstede’s Studies awkward situations
Hall’s Studies − Russia: “Smile for no reason is a sign of mental confusion”, a
Trompenaars’ Studies laughter has actually to come from the heart
Schwartz’ Studies Adapted from: Schugk (2014).

E.g. ‘Eye contact’ (frequency, duration and intensity)


GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation
− Western countries: Looking into the eyes of the conversation partner
− Japan: Looking at the nose of the conversation partner
 E.g. ‘closed eyes’
No. 49 − Western countries: tiredness, absent-mindedness
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase − Asia: concentration or attention to a speech
Gestures

Introduction

Communication
 Intentional movements of arms, hands, fingers and the head for
Verbal
communicational purposes
Communication

Nonverbal
Nonverbal
 Vast intercultural differences!
Communication
Communication

Culture
 E.g. ‘Yes’ vs. ‘No’: nod (of the head) may also mean ‘No’,
depending on speed and intensity
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies Source: Heringer (2012, 2014).

Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 50

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Examples: Gestures

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Nonverbal
Communication
Communication

Culture

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study
1) OK (USA); zero or rather “You are null and void” (France), money (Japan), “I’ll kill
Cultural Adaptation
you” (Tunisia), insulting anal gesture (Greece, Latin countries)
2) Two, victory (Germany, Great Britain), insulting sexual gesture (Great Britain)
3) “Goodbye” (Greek, Italy), “Come here” (Germany, USA)
No. 51 4) “Good” (Germany, Brazil), insulting sexual gesture (Australia, Nigeria)

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase Source: Schugk (2014).


Examples: Counting with Hands

Introduction UK, USA


Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Nonverbal
Communication
Communication

Culture

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies China


Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

Japan

No. 52

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Proxemics (1)

Introduction
 (lat.) proximus = the nearest, closest
Communication

Verbal  Use of space within interpersonal communication  ‘space language’


Communication

Nonverbal
Nonverbal  Signals that individuals exchange through adopting a certain distance
Communication
Communication
between each other
Culture

Stereotypes
 “… the interrelated observations and theories of humans use of space
Cultural Studies
as a specialized elaboration of culture.“ (Hall, 1966)
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies
 Interpersonal distance categories (Hall, 1966):
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies − Intimate distance: up to 45 cm (for embracing, touching or whispering)


GLOBE Study
− Personal distance: 45 to 120 cm (for interactions among good friends or family)
Cultural Adaptation
− Social distance: 120 to 360 cm (for interactions among acquaintances)
− Public distance: from 360 cm (used for public speaking)

No. 53

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Proxemics (2)

Introduction
Proxemics depends on type, situation and culture
Communication

Verbal  High intercultural differences of interpersonal distance (Latin


Communication
America/Arabia < Europe < USA (arm length) < Japan, China)
Nonverbal
Nonverbal
Communication
Communication
 Relevance for seating arrangements (e.g. USA: aprox. 1,5 meter)
Culture

Stereotypes
 Body orientation (e.g. Germany: frontal facing, Great Britain: shoulder
Cultural Studies
to shoulder in 110° degree)
Source: Schugk (2014).
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies low high


GLOBE Study ‘informal ‘informal
Cultural Adaptation space’ space’

Indian and South South North


Arab Asian
Pakistani European American European

No. 54 Source: Watson (1970).

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Posture

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Nonverbal
Communication
Communication

Culture

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study Forms of Japanese Bowing


Cultural Adaptation 1) 15 degree-bow: encouraging the customer to go on rummaging
2) 30 degree-bow: well-bred greeting to customers
3) 45 degree-bow: saying goodbye to customers (also without
making a deal)
No. 55 4) 90 degree-bow: gesture of subordination
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Source: Zoske (2004).
Haptic Communication

Introduction
 Touching communication and behaviour
Communication  Body contact is associated with entering the
Verbal
Communication
personal or intimate space
Nonverbal
Nonverbal
Communication
Communication
Frequency of body contact of persons in a café
Culture

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies
City (country) Frequency of body
contacts
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies
San Juan (Puerto Rico) 180
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies
Paris (France) 110
GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation Gainsesville (Florida / USA) 2

London (Great Britain) 0

No. 56

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Kroeber-Riel/Weinberg (2003).
Comparison of Nonverbal Communication Patterns

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication Behaviour Japanese US-American Brazilian
Nonverbal
Nonverbal
Communication
Communication

Culture Silent periods (number of periods


of more than 10 seconds during 5,5 3,5 0
Stereotypes
30 minutes)
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
Direct eye contact (in minutes 1,3 3,3 5,3
Hall’s Studies
during a period of 10 minutes)
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study
Touches (during 30 minutes, 0 0 4,7
without handshaking)
Cultural Adaptation

No. 57

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Rentzsch (1999).
Questions to Check for Learning

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
1. Please refer to the relevance of nonverbal communication in the
Communication
intercultural context!
Nonverbal
Nonverbal
Communication
Communication

Culture
2. Classify and characterize the types of nonverbal communication?
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies
3. Which are the characteristics in paralinguistic communication?
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies
4. What do the terms ‘Proxemics’ and ‘Haptic communication’ stand for?
Trompenaars’ Studies
5. In which way are material artefacts important for communication?
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 58

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Concepts and Models of Culture

Culture is …
(1) The care of soul, mind, body (cultura animi)
Introduction
(2) The care of the earth and the soil (agriculture)
Communication
(3) The care of transcendent relations (cultura Dei)
Verbal
Communication
(4) The care of (inter-)personal relations (civilitas, urbanitas)
Source: Bolten (2007).
Nonverbal
Communication

Culture
Culture
“That whole complex which includes knowledge, beliefs, art, morals,
law, customs, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as
Stereotypes
a member of society”
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
Source: Tylor (1871).

Hall’s Studies
“Transmitted patterns of values, ideas and other symbolic systems that
Trompenaars’ Studies
shape behaviour“
Schwartz’ Studies
Source: Krober/Kluckhohn (1952).
GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation
“Values, beliefs and expectations that members come to share”
Source: van Maanen/Schein (1979).

“The collective programming of the mind that distinguishes the


No. 59
members of one group or category of people from others”
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase Source: Hofstede (1993).
Culture as an Iceberg

Introduction
artefacts visible, conscious
music rituals
Communication culture: perceptas
Verbal
Communication
tradition symbols architecture (superficial structure)
Nonverbal
Communication
food art clothing language literature
Culture
Culture

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies group standards performance motivation


Trompenaars’ Studies

opinions relations
attitudes
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation
values duties invisible,
way of thinking unconscious
feelings culture:
basic assumptions conceptas
norms
(deep structure)
No. 60

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Perlitz (2004).
Definition of Culture by Hofstede

Culture can be understood as…


Introduction
“Culture [...] is always a collective phenomenon, because it is at least
Communication
partly shared with people who live or lived within the same social
Verbal
Communication environment, which is where it was learned. It is the collective
Nonverbal
programming of the mind which distinguishes the members of one
Communication
group or category of people from another.”
Culture
Culture

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies individual specific level Perso- experienced and


Hall’s Studies
nality learned
Trompenaars’ Studies

group or category
Schwartz’ Studies
Culture learned
GLOBE Study
specific level
Cultural Adaptation

universal Human nature inherited


level
No. 61

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Hofstede (1997).
Definition of Culture by Trompenaars
Culture is a dynamic process of solving human
problems/dilemmas in the fields of
− Human relations
Introduction

Communication
− Time
Verbal
Communication
− Nature
Nonverbal
Communication
Culture = language, food, architecture, music, clothes,
Culture
Culture literature, climate, noise, body contact etc.
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies ‘Onion Model’:


Hofstede’s Studies
Explicit culture (objects and
Hall’s Studies
products)
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies Values (good/bad)


GLOBE Study and norms
Cultural Adaptation (right/wrong)

Implicit culture (fundamental


suppositions about the
No. 62 existence)

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Trompenaars (1993).
Origin and Development of Cultures

Introduction
Origin
Communication
Geography
Verbal
Communication (Climate, Topography, Microbiology)
Nonverbal
Communication

Culture
Culture History
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies
Technology, Politics, Economy
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies
social Institutions
(Family, Religion, School, Media, Government, Enterprises etc.)
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study
Sociali-
sation

Cultural Adaptation

Imitation
Human
National Culture
No. 63
Beings

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Cateora et al. (2011).
Functions of Culture

Introduction

Communication
Holistic: Culture is the die collective shared cognitive infrastructure,
serves as system for identification and orientation, can be divided
Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal into subsystems.


Communication

Culture
Culture

Stereotypes
Learnable: In order to get integrated and accepted as member of a
cultural group, an individual must go though a learning process.
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies
Dynamic: Four main mechanisms can cause a change of a culture:
Trompenaars’ Studies
technological inventions, disasters, culture contact and
environmental factors.
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation
Ruling: Culture influences all aspects of our live and sets standards
for communication, perception, thinking, judging and acting.

No. 64

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Chen und Starosta (1998).
Mutual Perception of Intercultural Distances

Introduction Example:
Finland While the distance between
Communication

Verbal
South Korean managers and
Communication
Germany is 77 % of the
Nonverbal
Communication
objective distance, the
272 distance between German and
Culture
Culture
South Korean managers is 119
Stereotypes
% of the objective distance.
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies
104
Schwartz’ Studies
77 48 77 119
GLOBE Study
Japan Germany South
Cultural Adaptation
Korea
52

95

No. 65 South
Africa
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Source: Schugk (2014).
Example: Learning Types

Introduction How do I learn to use my smartphone?


Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture
Culture

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 66

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Siemens AG (2001).
Critical Incident: Job Interview

Introduction

Communication

Verbal The following job interview between a Western employer and a Korean applicant was
Communication
recorded:
Nonverbal
Communication Employer: Are you confident in performing the duties of a file clerk?
Culture
Culture Korean: Yes, I am. I have a B.A. degree from Seoul University. My family is known to be
good one, and I have been getting whatever I want from everybody.
Stereotypes
Employer: But have you ever worked in a filing department in any company?
Cultural Studies
Korean: Yes, I can. I can type, drive and have a B.A. degree from the best university in
Hofstede’s Studies
Korea.
Hall’s Studies
Employer: Can you order things alphabetically?
Trompenaars’ Studies Korean: I learned English for six years in high school and four years at college. I used to be
Schwartz’ Studies the best student in those days.
GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 67

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Park (1990).
Cultural Standards

Introduction
…all types of perception, thinking, evaluating and acting within a
culture that are considered normal, natural, typical and binding
Communication

Verbal
Communication
Germany USA China
Nonverbal
Communication • Interpersonal distance • Saving face
• Individualism
Culture
Culture • Directness of • Bureaucracy
interpersonal • Equality of opportunity
Stereotypes
• Performance • ‘Danwei’ (social unity)
communication
Cultural Studies orientation • ‘Guanxi’ (social system
• Formality and rule of relations)
Hofstede’s Studies orientation • Interpersonal
accessibility • Social harmony
Hall’s Studies • Hierarchy- und
authority orientation • Intrapersonal • Humour
Trompenaars’ Studies

• Need of organisation reservedness • Use of tactics/haggle


Schwartz’ Studies
• Fulfilment of one’s • Patriotism • Separation of working
GLOBE Study
duty • Mobility and private area
Cultural Adaptation
• Personal property • Hierarchy orientation
• Delimited private • National pride
sphere

No. 68
Cultural Standards  Stereotypes

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Thomas (1991), Markowsky/Thomas (1995), Kutschker/Schmid (2006).
Questions to Check for Learning

Introduction

Communication

Verbal 1. How can the term ‘Culture’ be understood?


Communication

2. What characterises culture according to Hofstede?


Nonverbal
Communication

Culture
Culture

Stereotypes 3. What characterises culture according to Trompenaars?


Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies 4. Which factors influence the development of cultures?


Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies
5. Which functions does culture have within the realms of
Schwartz’ Studies
interpersonal relations?
GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 69

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Stereotypes

Introduction Stereotype: stereós (Greek) = firm, defined, spatial; týpos (Greek) = -like)
Communication

Verbal
Stereotype Ethnocentrism
Communication
Definition: overgeneralised and ethno (Greek) = nation
Nonverbal
Communication oversimplified categorisation of a Definition: belief in the inherent
Culture
group of people superiority of the own group or
Stereotypes
Stereotypes
− Heterostereotypes: images about culture, combined with a feeling of
other cultures contempt towards other groups or
Cultural Studies
− Autostereotypes: images about cultures
Hofstede’s Studies
own culture
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies  Members of a culture take their


Schwartz’ Studies
 Reduction of cultural complexity own cultural standards as basis for
GLOBE Study
 Characterisation of others by the interpretation and judgment of
first impression other groups or cultures
Cultural Adaptation
 Use of some characteristics for the  Unconscious tendency of larger
whole group groups or cultures to consider their
 Every member is treated the same customs and norms as superior

No. 70

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Chen und Starosta (1998).
Stereotypes about Germans

Deutsche sind direkt. Deutsche lieben


Introduction
Ordnung, sind
Communication
organisiert und
Verbal Deutsche haben halten sich an
Communication
keinen Humor. Regeln.
Nonverbal
Communication

Culture

Stereotypes
Stereotypes Deutsche lieben
Cultural Studies Perfektion und
Hofstede’s Studies Pünktlichkeit.
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies
Deutsche
ernähren sich von
Schwartz’ Studies

Deutsche lieben
GLOBE Study
Bratwurst, Bier
Fußball und Autos.
Cultural Adaptation
und Kartoffeln.

No. 71

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Example: Stereotypes in the European Union

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture

Stereotypes
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 72

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Example: Mapping Stereotypes in Europe

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture

Stereotypes
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 73

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Quelle: Tsvetkov et al. (2018).
Example: Stereotypes in the German-Chinese Context

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture
German Chinese
Stereotypes
Stereotypes
Self-image: Self-image:
Cultural Studies
Helper pose with Cultural superiority
Hofstede’s Studies orientation of profit
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies Image of foreigner: Image of foreigner:


Schwartz’ Studies Mysterious, Primitive Barbarian, to
unapproachable, be wary of and who can
GLOBE Study
reserved be outwitted
Cultural Adaptation
Suspected image of Suspected image of
foreigner: foreigner:
Teacher-student-relation Poor, uneducated
with orientation of Chinese, who can be
obedience and gratitude exploited to maximise
No. 74 profit

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Thomas (2005).
Dimensions of Stereotypes

Introduction
1) Direction:
Communication
− Positive / negative valuation of qualities
Verbal
Communication
− E.g. “Americans are hard working”, “Americans are slapdash” or
“Finns are hospitable”
Nonverbal
Communication

Culture 2) Intensity:
Stereotypes
Stereotypes − Varying intensity of the real content of a stereotype
Cultural Studies − E.g. “Cubans are very musical”, “Los españoles viven la noche”
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies 3) Correctness:


Trompenaars’ Studies
− Level of trueness of a stereotype
Schwartz’ Studies
− E.g. core of truth (e.g. “British politeness”) or for the most part
correct (e.g. “business culture USA”)
GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation
4) Content:
− Different heterostereotypes according to the considered culture

No. 75

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Schugk (2014).
Example: Influence of Stereotypes on Sales

Introduction

Communication
 VW Sharan, Ford Galaxy and Seat Alhambra produced since 1995
Verbal
Communication
 Almost identical minivan, hardly differences in price
Nonverbal
Communication
 Completely different sales figures in Germany:
Culture
VW Sharan Ford Galaxy Seat Alhambra
Stereotypes
Stereotypes
1997 29.913 16.733 3.436
Cultural Studies
2003 22.171 13.968 7.055
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies
Source: Kfz-Bundesamt Flensburg (2003).

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies
 Opposite situation in Great Britain, where Ford is dominant
GLOBE Study  All three vehicle types were produced in the factory AutoEuropa in
Cultural Adaptation Portugal, in the final stage of cooperation the Ford Galaxy even in
paid labour of VW

No. 76

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Bolten (2007).
Example: Stereotypes in Advertising

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture

Stereotypes
Stereotypes

Source: Elsdorfer Molkerei (2018).


Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies Source: Germanwings (2005).

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 77

Source: Ricola (2017).


Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Questions to Check for Learning

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication 1. How are ‘Stereotypes’ defined?
Nonverbal
Communication

Culture
2. What is the difference between heterostereotypes
and autostereotypes?
Stereotypes
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies
3. What is the meaning of the term ‘Ethnocentrism’?
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies
4. How can stereotypes affect the intercultural
Trompenaars’ Studies
communication?
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 78

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Comparative Cultural Studies

Introduction

Communication

Quantitative
Verbal Hofstede (1997, 2001,
Communication
2010)
Nonverbal
Communication
Trompenaars (1993, 2012) …
Schwartz (1999)
Culture
GLOBE-Studie (2004)
Stereotypes Research
Cultural Studies
Cultural Studies method
Hofstede’s Studies Qualitative
Hall’s Studies Hall (1976, 1983) …
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation Different Individual


countries countries

Subject of examination
No. 79

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Content, Objectives and Limitations

Rationale and Content: Intensity


Differences in the mean of
Introduction  Defined basic problems of a culture particular cultural phenomena
Communication between two extremes
Verbal
 Characterisation, schematisation and
Communication
delimitation of cultural thought patterns
Nonverbal  Reflection of fundamental areas of Culture A Culture B
Communication
potential cultural differences
Culture

Stereotypes μA μB Cultural
Objective and Sense: Phenomenon
Cultural Studies
Cultural Studies
 Sensitisation for cultural differences and similarities
Hofstede’s Studies
 Orientation in intercultural interactions
Hall’s Studies
 Fast ‘cultural overview’ about a group
Trompenaars’ Studies
 Basis for self-reflection and awareness of others
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study
Limits and Threats:
Cultural Adaptation
 Danger of unconscious stereotyping
 Construction of a unreal cultural homogeneity
 Concentration on separating differences (the ‘Foreign’)
 Static image of a culture
No. 80  No description of individual behaviour
Adapted from: Hofstede (2001), Trompenaars/Hampden-Turner (2012),
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase Treichel (2009), Fischer/Furrer-Küttel (2009).
Comparison of Cultural Dimensions

Kluckhohn/ Hofstede
Hall Adler Trompenaars Schwartz Globe
Introduction Strodtbeck (1983, 1993,
(1976, 1983) (1986) (1993, 2012) (1999) (2004)
(1973) 2010)
Communication institutioneller
Kontextgebundenheit Individualismus vs.
Linearität vs. Individualismus vs. Individualismus vs. Einbettung vs. Kollektivismus
vs. Kontext- Kollektivismus
Reference of Individualismus Kollektivismus Kollektivismus Autonomie (Institutional collectivism)
ungebundenheit (Personal relationship:
Verbal identity (Linealty vs. (Individualism vs. (Individualism vs. (Embeddedness vs. Intra-Gruppen
(High context vs. low individualism or
Communication individualism) collectivism) communitarianism) autonomy) Kollektivismus
context cultures) collectivism)
(In-group collectivism)
Universalismus vs. Hierarchie vs.
Nonverbal Hierarchical Machtdistanz Partikularismus Gleichheit Machtdistanz
Communication
relations (Power distance) (Universalism vs. (Hierarchy vs. (Power distance)
particularism) egalitarianism)
Culture Dealing with
Unsicherheits- Unsicherheits-
novel,
vermeidung vermeidung
unstructured
Stereotypes (Uncertainty avoidance) (Uncertainty avoidance)
situations
Geschlechtergleichheit
Cultural Studies
Cultural Studies (Gender egalitarianism)
Maskulinität vs.
Gender roles Neutralität vs. Durchsetzungsfähigkeit/
Femininität
and social Emotionalität Bestimmtheit
Hofstede’s Studies (Masculinity vs.
(Neutral vs. emotional) (Assertiveness)
behaviour femininity)
Humanorientierung
Hall’s Studies (Humane orientation)
monochrone vs. Sequenziell vs.
Understan- polychrone Kulturen synchron
Trompenaars’ Studies ding of time (Monochronic vs. (Sequential vs.
polychronic cultures) synchronous)
Vergangenheits-,
Schwartz’ Studies Langfrist- vs.
Vergangenheit vs. Gegenwarts- und
Time Kurzfristorientierung Zukunftsorientierung
Zukunft Zukunftsorientierung
orientation (Long-term vs. short- (Future orientation)
GLOBE Study (Past vs. future)
term orientation)
(Time: past, present, or
future)
öffentlicher vs. privater
Cultural Adaptation Space Raumorientierung Raum
orientation (Proxemics) (Space: public or
private)
Sein oder Tun Leistung vs. Herkunft Leistungsorientierung
Performance Sein vs. Handeln
(Activity: doing or (Achievement vs. (Performance
orientation (Being vs. doing)
being) ascription) orientation)
Unterordnung vs. Bedürfnisbefriedigung/
Überlegenheit vs.
Dominanz Genuss vs. Beziehung zur Umwelt Einstellung zur Umwelt
Fate Harmonie
(Subjugation to nature Einschränkung (People’s relationship (Internal vs. outer
orientation vs. mastery over (Indulgence vs. to their world) direction)
(Mastery vs.
harmony)
No. 81 nature) restraint)
Spezifizität vs.
Areas of life Diffusheit
(Specific vs. diffuse)
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Classification of Cultural Spheres

Introduction
Near Eastern Nordic
Communication

Verbal
Turkey Finland
Communication Arab Norway Germanic
Bahrain Iran Denmark
Nonverbal Austria
Communication Abu-Dhabi Greece Sweden
UAE Germany
Culture Saudi Arabia
Kuwait Switzerland
Stereotypes Oman
Cultural Studies
Cultural Studies Singapore Malaysia United States
Far Eastern Hong Kong Canada
Hofstede’s Studies Anglo
Philippines Argentine New Zealand
Hall’s Studies South Korea France United Kingdom
Indonesia Venezuela
Trompenaars’ Studies Ireland
Taiwan Chile Belgium
Mexico South Africa
Schwartz’ Studies
Thailand
Latin America Latin European
GLOBE Study
Peru Italy Spain
Cultural Adaptation
Brazil Columbia Portugal Israel
Japan India
Independent

No. 82

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: House et al. (2004).
Questions to Check for Learning

Introduction

Communication

Verbal 1. Describe objectives and contents of comparative cultural


Communication
studies!
Nonverbal
Communication

Culture 2. Which key categories were found in order to classify cultures?


Stereotypes

Cultural Studies
Cultural Studies
3. What are the limitations and threats of comparative cultural
Hofstede’s Studies
studies!
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies
4. Which main cultural spheres were identified by cultural
studies?
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 83

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Comparative Cultural Studies by Hofstede

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies Gerard Hendrik (Geert) Hofstede


Dutch social and organisational researcher (* 1928)
Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies
Most famous study of intercultural comparative research
Trompenaars’ Studies Data based on studies at IBM from 1967 to 1972, more
Schwartz’ Studies
than 50 countries were examined
GLOBE Study Six cultural dimensions:
Cultural Adaptation  Power distance (or rather acceptance of power differences)
 Individualism vs. collectivism
 Uncertainty avoidance
 Masculinity vs. femininity
No. 84
 Long-term vs. short-term orientation (added in 1985)
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase  Indulgence vs. restraint (added in 2010)
Country Indices by Hofstede

Power Individualism Uncertainty Long-term vs.


Introduction Masculinity Indulgence
Distance vs. Avoidance Short-term
Country vs. Femininity vs. Restraint
Index Collectivism Index Orientation
Communication MAS IVR
PDI IDV UAI LTO
Verbal
Communication Africa East 64 27 41 52 32 40
Africa West 77 20 46 54 9 78
Nonverbal
Communication
Arab countries 80 38 53 68 23 34
Australia 36 90 61 51 21 71
Culture Austria 11 55 79 70 60 63
Brazil 69 38 49 76 44 59
Stereotypes Chile 63 23 28 86 31 68
China 80 20 66 30 87 24
Cultural Studies France 68 71 43 86 63 48
Germany (West) 35 67 66 65 83 40
Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies
Great Britain 35 89 66 35 51 69
Hall’s Studies
Greece 60 35 57 112 45 50
Iran 58 41 43 59 14 40
Trompenaars’ Studies Italy 50 76 70 75 61 30
India 77 48 56 40 51 26
Schwartz’ Studies Japan 54 46 95 92 88 42
Mexico 81 30 69 82 24 97
GLOBE Study
Netherlands 38 80 14 53 67 68
Norway 31 69 8 50 35 55
Cultural Adaptation
Pakistan 55 14 50 70 50 0
Romania 90 30 42 90 52 20
Russia 93 39 36 95 81 20
Switzerland 34 68 70 58 74 66
Spain 57 51 42 86 48 44
Turkey 66 37 45 85 46 49
U.S.A. 40 91 62 46 26 68
No. 85
Scale from 1 to 120, bold = high values, complete list of indices available at:
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
https://geerthofstede.com/research-and-vsm/dimension-data-matrix/
Source: Hofstede (2010).
Power Distance

Introduction Power distance (tolerance or acceptance of power difference) is the


Communication degree at which less powerful members of institutions and
Verbal
organisations in a country expect and accept the unequal division of
Communication
power
Nonverbal
Communication

Culture
 Characterisation of a culture treating with power differences,
Stereotypes inequality and authority
Cultural Studies
 High PDI: low participation of subordinates in decision-making
Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies (authoritarian management style)
Low PDI: high integration of hierarchical subordinates in decision-
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies
making (cooperative management style)
Schwartz’ Studies
 E.g. high PDI: many Central and South American, Asian and
Arabian countries
GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation
 E.g. low PDI: most Central European and Anglo-Saxon countries
(exception France with relatively PDI)

No. 86

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Hofstede (2001).
Critical Incident: Jean-Baptiste Bernadotte

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal What do you think is happening here?


Communication
Back in 1908 Sweden had a problem. King Gustav IV was so incompetent that Parliament
Culture had him removed und began looking for an outside candidate to take over. Someone
Stereotypes suggested one of Napoleon’s generals, Jean-Baptiste Bernadotte, a brilliant strategist who
enjoyed the privileges of power.
Cultural Studies
Upon being crowned, Bernadotte addressed Parliament in Swedish. Unfortunately, his
Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies
command of the language was lamentable; some members laughed out loud. The new king
Hall’s Studies was so upset he never spoke a word of Swedish again. Despite this, he ruled for the next 35
years and was adored by the Swedish people.
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 87

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Schmidt (2007).
Examples: Power Distance

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication
High power distance Low power distance
Culture  France, e.g. scandal regarding  USA, e.g. scandal
Stereotypes former president Francois Mitterand concerning former president Bill
Cultural Studies
because of illegitimate daughter, Clinton because of sexual
discreet treatment in the media relation to a trainee, extreme
Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies
examination of this case in the
Hall’s Studies  ‘Untouchability’ of person in high media (e.g. ‘cigar’)
Trompenaars’ Studies
positions or functions
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 88

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Schugk (2014).
Individualism vs. Collectivism

Introduction
Individualism in a society refers to loose social relations between individuals
Communication
and the expectation that everyone cares for his/herself and his/her family.
 Responsibility of the individual for his/herself and the own family
Verbal
Communication  Accentuation of personal responsibility, independence, self-confidence and
Nonverbal self-realisation
Communication
 Task fulfilment in business is more important than interpersonal relations (e.g.
Culture
Adam Smith)
Stereotypes  More loose interpersonal relations
Cultural Studies  E.g. high IDV: USA, Australia, UK, Canada (Anglo-Saxon countries)
Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies
Collectivism refers to societies in which an individual is integrated into
Trompenaars’ Studies
strong, ‘closed’ groups that protect him/her for the entire life and expect
unconditional loyalty.
Schwartz’ Studies
 Lifelong integration in so-called ‘In-groups’ (e.g. large family)
GLOBE Study
 Expectation of loyalty towards group
Cultural Adaptation
 Subordination of individual interests
 Interpersonal relations in business as important as task fulfilment
 E.g. low IDV: many Central and South American as well as Asian countries
(exception: Japan)
No. 89

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Hofstede (2001).
Examples: Individualism

 Verbal communication in high IDV countries plays an important


Introduction
role, silence is seen as abnormal or suspect
Communication
Source: Hofstede (2001).
Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication  Leaving out of pronoun for first person singular (examination of 39
Culture languages in 71 countries)
Stereotypes − E.g. ‘ich’ in German or ‘I’ (capital letter!) in English vs. ‘yo’ in
Cultural Studies Spanish or ‘ben’ in Turkish
Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies − Strong negative correlation between leaving out of pronoun of
Hall’s Studies first person singular and high IDV
Trompenaars’ Studies Source: Kashima/Kashima (1998).

Schwartz’ Studies
 IDV correlates with economic development (data from 1960-1995)
GLOBE Study
Source: Gorodnichenko/Roland 2011).
Cultural Adaptation

 High PDI correlates with low IDV = collectivism (exception: France


and Belgium, here correlation with high IDV)
No. 90

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Business Suggestions

Introduction

Communication
Collectivist cultures Individualist cultures
Verbal
Communication Be patient, things take time Accept individual responsibilities
Nonverbal
Communication Work within the group Give praise for top performance
Culture
Don’t expect immediate feedback Stimulate individual initiative within the
Stereotypes team
Cultural Studies
Allow people to discuss new Promote yourself
Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies
information
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies Get support of key members Act quickly following an agreement
Schwartz’ Studies
(integrate)
GLOBE Study
Avoid singling out individuals Don’t rely on others
Cultural Adaptation
Praise the group Recognise individual contributions
Do not push for decisions on the spot Make decisions quickly

No. 91

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Schmidt (2007).
Exercise: Individualism or Collectivism?

1. People respect and uphold traditions


Introduction

Communication 2. People receive bonuses based on sales


Verbal
Communication 3. Interdepartmental rivalry is strong
Nonverbal
Communication
4. Employee-of-the-month certificates are offered
Culture 5. Over a dozen clauses and amendments are part of a standard sales contract
Stereotypes
6. People change the company they work for every three years on average
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies
7. It’s best to let out your feelings and clear the air
Hall’s Studies 8. People dream of being stars – uniquely successful
Trompenaars’ Studies
9. It’s most important to save face in all situations
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study
10. Mothers ask their two-year-olds what they want to eat
Cultural Adaptation 11. Self-help books are bestsellers
12. Consensus between industry, unions and the state is normal
13. Marriages are arranged by the family
No. 92 14. Opinions are decided by the group

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Uncertainty Avoidance

Introduction

Communication Uncertainty avoidance is the degree at which members of a


Verbal culture feel threatened by uncertain or unknown situations.
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture  High UAI: overcoming of uncertainty through rules and guidelines,


techniques and precaution (e.g. code law)
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies  Low UAI: acceptance of ‘disordered’ situations


Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies
 UAI may be quite different even within a regions
Hall’s Studies
 E.g. low UAI: Asia, Africa, Anglo-Saxon and North European countries
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies  E.g. high UAI: Latin America, South-European countries, but also Japan,
GLOBE Study
Germany, Austria, Italy (influence of world wars)
Cultural Adaptation

No. 93

Source: Hofstede (2001).


Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Examples: Uncertainty Avoidance

Introduction
 Pronoun for second person singular or plural
(examination of 39 languages in 71 countries):
Communication

Verbal
− E.g. ‘you’ in English vs. ‘tu’ or ‘vous’ in French
Communication
− Positive correlation between using different pronouns
for second person singular or plural and UAI in order
Nonverbal
Communication

Culture to avoid of wrong addressees


Stereotypes Source: Kashima/Kashima (1998).
Cultural Studies

 In the EU, quality of potable water has considerably


Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies
improved over the last decades
Trompenaars’ Studies
 However, the consumption of mineral water varies
drastically:
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study
− In Belgium (high UAI), consumption is ten times than
Cultural Adaptation
in the UK and six times higher than in the Netherlands
− Also in Germany consumption is on a high level
− Use of mineral water is evidently seen as an
No. 94
‘investment’ in health
Source: de Mooij/Hofstede (2002).
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Exercise: High or Low Uncertainty Avoidance?

1. Well, let’s just agree to disagree; there’s room for more than one approach
Introduction

Communication
2. We need to spell things out clearly: who’s responsible if this goes wrong?
Verbal
3. Janet doesn’t like to stay in one place – she changes jobs at least once a year
Communication
4. Pierre always keeps his emotions under control
Nonverbal
Communication 5. You never know when Jürgen is going to blow up
Culture 6. The Board of Directors insists that we bring in experts to make sure we’ve made
Stereotypes the right decision
Cultural Studies 7. People that elect a former body-builder and movie star as their governor isn’t too
Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies
worried about risks
Hall’s Studies 8. Students expect teachers to be experts in their field of study
Trompenaars’ Studies 9. Watanabe was made department head because he’s the best at what we do
Schwartz’ Studies 10. The company doesn’t like executives who are overly willing to blend the rules
GLOBE Study 11. Mark is our most creative person; the trouble is he always forgets his
Cultural Adaptation appointments
12. The British have great admiration for eccentric people
13. I make good common sense decisions – I don’t need an expert to tell me how to
act
No. 95 14. Susan always has a neat desk, never a pencil out of place

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Masculinity vs. Femininity

Introduction
Masculinity stands for cultures in which ‘male’ characteristics are
Communication
dominating. Gender roles are determined and clearly differentiated.
Verbal
Communication  Accentuation of value concepts such as goal-, profit- and competitor-
Nonverbal orientation, task accomplishment, recognition, even aggressiveness
Communication
 Maximum difference of value concepts between men and women
Culture
 E.g.: Central Europe (but not France), USA, Japan
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies
Femininity stands for cultures being mainly characterised by ‘feminine’
Hall’s Studies
qualities. Gender roles in these cultures are not strictly separated.
Trompenaars’ Studies
 Accentuation of value concepts such as care, cooperation, modesty,
sympathy, tolerance and social orientation, protecting the ‘weaker’
Schwartz’ Studies
 E.g.: Nordic countries of Europe
GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

 This cultural dimension does not refer to the role men and women have in a
society (‘machismo’), it rather refers to the values that predominate among
both genders.

No. 96

Adapted from: Hofstede (2001).


Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Business Suggestions

Introduction

Communication
Feminine cultures Masculine cultures
Verbal Take the time to know and cooperate Recognise that business comes first
Communication
with colleagues
Nonverbal
Communication
Develop a sense of solidarity; Caring for others comes second or not
Culture
friendliness is more important than at all
Stereotypes
brilliance
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies
Don’t overtly display achievement Recognise individual achievement and
praise success
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies Learn to tolerate an open display of Learn to promote yourself unflinchingly
Schwartz’ Studies emotions
GLOBE Study
Appreciate expressions of goodwill Displaying material success is viewed
Cultural Adaptation
regardless of significance to business as positive

Remember consensus and harmony Showing solidarity doesn’t have as


are social cornerstones much relevance as performance
No. 97

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Schmidt (2007).
Long-Term vs. Short-Term Orientation

Long-term orientation stands for the support of values such as


Introduction

Communication
perseverance and thriftiness, which let expect reaching a reward in the
Verbal
Communication
future.
Nonverbal
 Orientation towards future
Communication
 So-called ‘Confucian dynamic’: acceptance of moral concepts such as
Culture
thriftiness, persistence, professional regulations and modesty
Stereotypes
 Hierarchy oriented on status, age
Cultural Studies
 E.g.: East Asian countries (China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Japan und South
Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies Korea)
Hall’s Studies

Short-term orientation stands for the support of values which are connected
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies
to the past and the present.
GLOBE Study
 Orientation towards past and present
Cultural Adaptation
 Acceptance of moral concepts such as fulfilment of social duties and flexibility
 Striving for short- and medium-term success
 Respect towards tradition

No. 98

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase Source: Hofstede (2001).


Indulgence vs. Restraint

 Based on the Bulgarian sociologist Minkov and also drew on the World
Introduction
Values Survey (2010), later adapted by Hofstede
Communication
 The extent to which members in society try to control their desires and
Verbal
Communication
impulses
Nonverbal
Communication
Indulgence
Culture  A tendency to allow relatively free gratification of basic and natural human
Stereotypes desires related to enjoying life and having fun
Cultural Studies
 Indulgent cultures will tend to focus more on individual happiness and well
being, leisure time is more important and there is greater freedom and
Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies
personal control
Hall’s Studies
 More importance on freedom of speech and personal control
Trompenaars’ Studies
 E.g. high IVR: Venezuela, Mexico, Nigeria, Colombia, Sweden, New Zealand
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study Restraint


Cultural Adaptation  A conviction that gratification of basic and natural human needs to be curbed
and regulated by strict social norms
 Positive emotions are less freely expressed and happiness, freedom and
leisure are not given the same importance
 Greater sense of helplessness about personal destiny
No. 99
 E.g. low IVR: Pakistan, Egypt, Latvia, Ukraine, Albania, Bulgaria, Estonia
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase Source: Hofstede (2010, 2011).
Cultural Dimensions and Types of Organisation

Introduction
Well-oiled machine (Germanic) Traditional bureaucracy „pyramid of
Decentralised decision-making people“ (Latin)
Communication
Narrow span of control Centralised decision-making
Verbal Specialist, technical competence Coordination at the top
Communication Less delegation
Discretion limited by expertise
Nonverbal high Top management team ‘Cloisonné’, highly specialised
Communication
Industry and company knowledge Strong role of staff
Culture Organised by function Analytic ability
Compartmentalised (chimneys) Pyramid of people
Stereotypes
Importance of routines and rules Informal relationships
Cultural Studies
Structural solutions ‘Système D’ (‘se débrouiller’)
Advoidance
Uncertainty

Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies Efficiency Elitist (power and authority)
Input control
Hall’s Studies
Village market (Anglo / Nordic) Family or tribe (Asian)
Trompenaars’ Studies
Decentralised Centralised
Schwartz’ Studies Generalist Paternalistic
GLOBE Study People as free agents Loyalty
Entrepreneurial Generalist
Cultural Adaptation
low Flexibility Strong social versus task roles
More delegation Personal relationships
Output control Social control
Coordination though informal, personal
communication
No. 100
low Power Distance high
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase Source: Kutschker/Schmid (2006).
Cultural Dimensions and Work Motivators

Introduction

Cultural dimension Dominant Work Motivators


Communication

Verbal
Communication
 Conform to norms and rules
High power distance
Nonverbal
Communication  Meet moral obligations to leaders
Culture
 Autonomy
Stereotypes Individualism  Challenging work
Cultural Studies  Advancement
Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies  Security
High uncertainty avoidance
Hall’s Studies  Clear organisational hierarchy
Trompenaars’ Studies
 Pay
Schwartz’ Studies
Masculinity  Training opportunities
GLOBE Study
 Achievement
Cultural Adaptation

No. 101

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Cultural Dimensions and Competitive Advantages

Introduction Cultural dimension Competitive advantage


Communication

Verbal
High power distance Discipline
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication
Low power distance Acceptance of responsibility
Culture
Individualism Management mobility
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies Collectivism Employee commitment


Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies
High uncertainty avoidance Precision
Trompenaars’ Studies
Low uncertainty avoidance Basic innovations
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study
Masculinity Mass production, efficiency
Cultural Adaptation

Personal service, custom-made


Femininity
product developments
Long-term orientation Development of new markets
No. 102

Short-term orientation Fast adaptation


Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Cultural Dimensions and the ‘Control Model’

Introduction

100
Communication

Verbal 90 Japan France


Communication
Control Model:
Nonverbal 80 Rules
Communication
(machine) Control Model:
Culture 70 Rules (Pyramid)
Stereotypes
60 Germany
Cultural Studies
UAI

Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies 50

Hall’s Studies USA


40 India
Trompenaars’ Studies GB
30
Schwartz’ Studies Control Model: Control Model:
GLOBE Study
20
Markets Culture
Cultural Adaptation
(family)
10

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

No. 103 PDI


Adapted from: Hofstede (1985).
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Cultural Dimensions and Leadership

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Cultural dimension Opinion leaders
Communication

Culture High power distance Powerholders


Stereotypes

Cultural Studies
Collectivism Elderly people
Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies
High uncertainty avoidance Technically competent people
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies
Masculinity Successful people
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 104

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Criticism of Hofstede’s Studies

Introduction  Inadequacy of just six dimensions for describing


Communication cultural differences
Verbal  Outdated empirical basis (but: permanence of culture)
Communication

Nonverbal
 Missing representativeness due to concentration on
Communication
IBM (particular firm culture?)
Culture
 Questionability of cultural characteristics when
Stereotypes
generally examining single nations
Cultural Studies
 Exploring of values about questions on the basis of
Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies
behavior
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies
 Speculative connection between management area
and other areas of life
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study
 Questionability of importance of dimensions for
Cultural Adaptation
communication style
Source: Schugk (2014).

 Nevertheless, the outcomes of Hofstede’s studies were


largely replicated by subsequent studies …
No. 105

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Questions to Check for Learning

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication
1. What does the cultural dimension ‘Power Distance’ stand for?
Nonverbal
Communication
2. What are the differences between individualism and collectivism?
Culture
3. Describe special characteristics of cultures with distinctive
Stereotypes masculinity or femininity!
Cultural Studies
4. What characterises the cultural dimension ‘Uncertainty Avoidance’?
Hofstede’s Studies
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies 5. What are the differences between cultures with long-term and
Trompenaars’ Studies short-term orientation?
Schwartz’ Studies
6. Describe the content of the cultural Dimension ‘Indulgence vs.
GLOBE Study
Restraint’?
Cultural Adaptation

No. 106

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Comparative Cultural Studies by Hall

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s
Hall’s Studies
Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies Founder of intercultural communication


GLOBE Study as anthropological science
Edward Twitchell Hall
Cultural Adaptation
(*1914; †2009)
Two cultural dimensions:
 High context vs. low context cultures (Beyond Culture, 1976)
 Monochronic vs. polychronic cultures (The Dance of Life: The Other
No. 107 Dimension of Time, 1983)
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
High Context vs. Low Context Cultures

Introduction
 Definition of culture on the basis of communication:
Communication

Verbal
Communication
“Any culture is primarily a system for creating, sending, storing,
Nonverbal
Communication and processing information. Communication underlies
Culture everything. Communication underlies everything.”
Stereotypes
“communication is culture, culture is communication”
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
 Communication depends on the prevailing context
Hall’s
Hall’s Studies
Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies
 “Context is the information that surrounds an event”
Schwartz’ Studies  Classification of cultures into:
GLOBE Study
− High context cultures  contextual communication
Cultural Adaptation

− Low context cultures  context-unbound communication

No. 108

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Hall (1976).
High Context Cultures

Introduction
 High importance of the context in which a communication is
embedded
Communication

Verbal
Communication
 Characteristics of contextual communication:
Nonverbal
Communication
− Indirectness
Culture − Implicitness
Stereotypes
− Circularity (mutual divulgation of information through piece by
piece verbalisation), therefore
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s
Hall’s Studies
Studies
− Explicit coding and transfer of a few (verbal) message parts
Trompenaars’ Studies
 High importance of
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study
− Outer circumstances
Cultural Adaptation − Personal relations and
− Nonverbal communication
 E.g.: Arabian countries, Japan, China, Korea and Mediterranean
No. 109 countries ( Hofstede’s collectivistic cultures)
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Sources: Hall (1976), Schugk (2014).
Circularity of Indirect Communication

Introduction

Communication

Verbal Spoken parts of


Communication
communication
Nonverbal
Communication
Message part 1
1 1
Culture
Message part 2
Stereotypes
2 2
Message part 3
Cultural Studies
3 3
Limit of Message part 4
Hofstede’s Studies
4 4
verbalisation Message part 5
Hall’s
Hall’s Studies
Studies
5 5
Trompenaars’ Studies
6 6
Unspoken parts
7 7
Schwartz’ Studies
of communication
GLOBE Study
8 8
Cultural Adaptation
9 9
10 10

Sender Recipient
No. 110

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Kessel (2000).
Low Context Cultures

Introduction
 Lower importance of the context in which a communication is
Communication
embedded
Verbal
Communication
 Characteristics of context-unbound communication
Nonverbal
Communication
− Directness
Culture

Stereotypes
− Explicitness
Cultural Studies
− Linearity, therefore
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s
Hall’s Studies
Studies
− Explicit coding and transfer of most message parts
(content, subject)
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies  Lower importance of


Outer circumstances
GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

− Personal relation (separation of privacy and work)


 E.g.: USA, Great Britain, Germany und Scandinavia
( Hofstede’s individualistic cultures)
No. 111

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Sources: Hall (1976), Schugk (2014).
Linearity of Direct Communication

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication
1 1
Culture Spoken parts of
Stereotypes
2 communication 2
Cultural Studies
3 3
Hofstede’s Studies
4 4
Hall’s
Hall’s Studies
Studies
5 5
Trompenaars’ Studies Limit of 6 6
Schwartz’ Studies
verbalisation 7 7
GLOBE Study
8 8
Cultural Adaptation
9 Unspoken 9
10 parts of 10
communi-
Sender cation Recipient
No. 112

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Kessel (2000).
Examples: High Context and Low Context Cultures (1)

Introduction
Importance of
Communication
context Japan
Verbal
Communication Arabian
Nonverbal High countries
Communication Latin America
Culture
Italy/Spain
Stereotypes
France
Cultural Studies
England
Hofstede’s Studies
USA
Hall’s
Hall’s Studies
Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies Scandinavia

Schwartz’ Studies Germany


GLOBE Study
Low Switzerland
Cultural Adaptation

Explicit transfer Implicit transfer


of information of information

No. 113

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Hollensen (2012).
Example: High Context and Low Context Cultures (2)

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication
Low context High context
(direct) (indirect)
Nonverbal
Communication

Culture
CH DE NL US GB FR RU BR IN CN JP

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
0 20 40 60 80 100
Hall’s
Hall’s Studies
Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 114

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Schmidt (2007).
Example: Chinese Editor’s Rejection Letter

Introduction

Communication
The following text deals with the notion of rejection, written by a Chinese editor:
Verbal
Communication „We have read your manuscript with boundless delight. If we were to publish your paper,
however, it would then be impossible for us to publish any work of a lower standard. And it
Nonverbal
Communication is unthinkable that in the next thousand years we shall see its equal. We are, to our regret,
compelled to return your divine composition and to beg you one thousand times to
Culture
overlook our short-sighted timidity.“
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
 ‘Saving face’ is an extremely important value, critical to survival and deeply
Hall’s
Hall’s Studies
Studies
embedded in the Asian mental pathway
Trompenaars’ Studies
 The Chinese possess a formidable number of honorific expressions
Schwartz’ Studies
 In American or European cultures, where „saving face“ is considerably less
GLOBE Study important, it is hardly expressed at all because these cultures don’t use such
Cultural Adaptation vocabulary

No. 115

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Schmidt (2007).
Business Suggestions

Introduction

Communication Low-context cultures High-context cultures


Verbal
Communication
Always be concise Avoid direct yes or no questions
Nonverbal
Communication
Answer e-mails, faxes and letters Use qualifiers such as „maybe“,
promptly; return phone calls „possibly“ etc.
Culture

Stereotypes Concentrate on the literal meaning of Ask for written confirmation of directions
Cultural Studies
words
Hofstede’s Studies
Structure meetings with an agenda Avoid putting people on the spot
Hall’s
Hall’s Studies
Studies
Don’t be offended by confrontations Don’t be impatient
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies
Begin reports with a concise summary Remain open to alternative solutions
GLOBE Study Deal with facts (control your feelings) Consider an employee’s entire situation
Cultural Adaptation before passing judgment

Understand that dissent (even strong) Expect personal issues to interfere with
is seldom personal performance

No. 116

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Schmidt (2007).
Exercise: High Context or Low Context Cultures?

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
1. “Let’s get straight to the point!”
Communication

Nonverbal
2. “Would it perhaps be possible to ask a question now?”
Communication
3. “You’re fired as of this moment!”
Culture

Stereotypes 4. “Gentlemen, let’s stop beating around the bush. Who’s at fault?”
Cultural Studies
5. “Your brand new Rolls Royce looks somewhat up-scale.”
Hofstede’s Studies
6. Chit-chatting before getting down to business.
Hall’s
Hall’s Studies
Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies 7. Communication between an old married couple.


Schwartz’ Studies
8. “You must read between the lines to understand the situation.”
GLOBE Study
9. “If I may say so, I believe your analysis is somewhat unclear.”
Cultural Adaptation

10. “The situation must be bad because the captain has taken over the ship.”

No. 117

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Monochronic vs. Polychronic Cultures

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication
 Distinction of cultures on the basis of time conception
(dealing with time)
Nonverbal
Communication

Culture
 Structuring the daytime is an everlasting problem of humans
Stereotypes  Time structuring is a ‘habitual rhythm’
Cultural Studies
 Classification of cultures into:
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s
Hall’s Studies
Studies − Monochronic cultures  time planning cultures
Trompenaars’ Studies
− Polychronic cultures  flexible time management
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 118

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Schugk (2014).
Exercise: 60 Seconds are Equal to a Minute – or not?

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s
Hall’s Studies
Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 119

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Monochronic cultures

Introduction

Communication
 Fixed time management
Verbal

Conditioned behaviour (origin: Industrial Revolution)


Communication

Nonverbal

Consecutive processing of (sub)tasks


Communication

Culture

Stereotypes  Orientation towards success (effectiveness and efficiency)


Cultural Studies
 High importance of time in society (‘time is money’)
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s
Hall’s Studies
Studies
 Need of punctuality
Trompenaars’ Studies  Intensive and comprehensive preparation of business
Schwartz’ Studies negotiations
GLOBE Study
 Low(er) importance of interpersonal relations
Cultural Adaptation

 E.g.: Netherlands, Germany, USA

No. 120

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Sources: Hall (1983), Schugk (2014).
Polychronic Cultures

Introduction

Communication

Verbal  Flexible time management


Communication

Nonverbal  Lower importance of schedules


Communication

Culture  Parallel or less structured processing of (sub-)tasks


Stereotypes
 Focus on actual activity
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies  Relevance of time is secondary (Indonesia: ‘rubber time’)


Hall’s
Hall’s Studies
Studies
 High importance of interpersonal relations
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies
 Relaxed handling of punctuality
GLOBE Study  E.g.: Japan, Latin America, Spain, Italy
Cultural Adaptation

No. 121

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Sources: Hall (1983), Schugk (2014).
Examples: Monochronic and Polychronic Cultures

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal Monochronic Polychronic


Communication

Culture
CH DE NL US GB FR RU CN BR IN JP

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
0 20 40 60 80 100
Hall’s
Hall’s Studies
Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 122

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Schmidt (2007).
Business Suggestions

Introduction

Communication Monochronic cultures Polychronic cultures


Verbal
Communication Report delays without delay! Set „realistic“ deadlines (checkpoints)
Nonverbal
Communication
Be as detailed and specific as possible Build in extra time (artificial deadlines)
Culture Plan ahead (even though you expect Keep in close contact with colleagues/
Stereotypes plans to be changed) subordinates (ask for status reports)
Cultural Studies
Keep strictly to appointments Give relationships precedence over
Hofstede’s Studies schedules
Hall’s
Hall’s Studies
Studies
Focus on one activity at a time Accept interruptions and (apparent)
Trompenaars’ Studies
(management-by-objectives) lack of focus
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study Learn to appreciate the history and


Cultural Adaptation
traditions of a company

Confirm meetings and other business


engagements

No. 123

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Schmidt (2007).
Exercise: Monochronic or Polychronic Cultures?

Introduction 1. When I’m on the phone, please don’t bother me.


Communication 2. Susan likes to do her homework while listening to the radio.
Verbal
Communication
3. Brazilians always arrive half an hour late for a dinner invitation.
Nonverbal
4. If my father gets a call from a friend, he’ll change his weekend plans at the last
Communication
minute.
Culture
5. Manfred respects my privacy.
Stereotypes
6. Bill Clinton spends endless hours with all kinds of people.
Cultural Studies
7. With Eric, you can be sure commitments will be honoured.
Hofstede’s Studies
8. Women seem less concerned about arriving on time than men.
Hall’s
Hall’s Studies
Studies
9. The CEO is easily distracted and subject to continual interruptions by his
Trompenaars’ Studies
secretaries.
Schwartz’ Studies
10. My cousin often talks on the phone while watching TV.
GLOBE Study
11. Germans are famous for their punctuality.
Cultural Adaptation
12. Mexicans don’t seem too worried about being late.
13. The deadline has to be respected.
14. A good personnel director is committed to people.
No. 124 15. John felt insulted because he had to wait 40 minutes to see the manager.

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Questions to Check for Learning

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture
1. Which cultural dimensions stand in focus of Hall’s studies?
Stereotypes
2. Please differentiate between high and low context cultures!
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies 3. What characterises monochronic and polychronic cultures?


Hall’s
Hall’s Studies
Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 125

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Comparative Cultural Studies by Trompenaars

Introduction  Dutch scientist and student of Geert Hofstede


Communication  Survey of almost 9.000 managers and
Verbal organisation employees of different
Communication
companies in 43 countries in the 80s and 90s
Nonverbal
Communication
 Theory to analyse the cultural differences in
Culture “Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding
Stereotypes Cultural Diversity in Business” (1993)
Alfons „Fons“ Trompenaars
Cultural Studies
(* 1952)
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies
Seven cultural dimensions :
Trompenaars’
Trompenaars’ Studies
Studies  Universalism vs. particularism
Schwartz’ Studies
 Neutral vs. emotional Description of
GLOBE Study
 Individualism vs. communitarianism human
Cultural Adaptation

 Specific vs. diffuse interaction

 Achievement vs. ascription Description of


 Internal vs. outer direction the interaction
No. 126
 Sequential vs. synchronous with time and
environment
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Universalism vs. Particularism (1)

Introduction
What is more important, rules or relationships?
Communication

Verbal
Communication
Universalist cultures:
Nonverbal
Communication
 Preference of impersonal rules, laws and standards that apply to all,
regardless of status and relation
Culture
 Exceptions are unwanted, because they weaken the rules and the system can
Stereotypes
collapse
Cultural Studies
 Low(er) importance of interpersonal relations
Hofstede’s Studies
 E.g.: USA (Prohibition 1918-1933 or „3 Strikes and Out-Regel“ in California)
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’
Trompenaars’ Studies
Studies Particularist cultures:
Schwartz’ Studies
 Refutation of strictly following the rules (“no matter what the rules say”)
GLOBE Study  Preference of personal rules and relations (unequal treatment, corruption),
Cultural Adaptation particular circumstances are considered
 E.g.: Saudi Arabia (Saudi princes vs. guest workers)

No. 127

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Hampden-Turner/Trompenaars (2012), Schugk (2014).
Universalism vs. Particularism (2)

Introduction

Communication
A Dilemma: To lie or not to lie – that is the question
Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal You are riding in a car driven by your best friend in a zone where the speed
Communication
limit is 40 km/h. You notice he’s going at least 20 km per hour too fast.
Culture
Although you warn him, he doesn’t slow down. Suddenly he hits – and kills- a
Stereotypes pedestrian. You are the only witness.
Cultural Studies
Your friend’s lawyer says he probably won’t go to jail if you testify that the car
Hofstede’s Studies
was travelling at normal speed.
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’
Trompenaars’ Studies
Studies
Schwartz’ Studies What would you do?
GLOBE Study
a) As my friend, he has the right to expect me to testify in his favour and I will.
Cultural Adaptation

b) He has no right to expect me to lie for him and I won’t.

No. 128

Source: Hampden-Turner/Trompenaars (2012).


Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Universalism vs. Particularism (3)

Yugoslawien 11
15
Introduction
Russland 20
21
Venezuela 23
Communication 25
China 29
Verbal
Communication
Griechenland
31
32 Percentage of interviewees
33
Singapur 37 who would make no false
Nonverbal 38
Communication Japan 39
39
statement
Culture
Kuba 40
42
Frankreich 42
Stereotypes 43  Universalist culture
Mexiko 48
Cultural Studies 49
Philippinen 50
51
Hofstede’s Studies Rumänien 51
52
Hall’s Studies
Spanien 53
56
Trompenaars’
Niederlande 59
Trompenaars’ Studies
Studies
60
Brasilien 62
Schwartz’ Studies 65
Schottland 67
68
GLOBE Study Großbritannien 68
69
Cultural Adaptation
Bahrain 70
71
Pakistan 72
73
USA 77
78
Irland 81
82
Finnland 85
87
No. 129 Norwegen 90
0 20 40 60 80 100
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase Source: Hampden-Turner/Trompenaars (2012).
Neutral vs. Emotional (1)

Introduction Do we display our emotions?


Communication

Verbal
Communication Neutral cultures:
Nonverbal  The main purpose of the society is completion of given tasks
Communication
 Avoidance of even everyday emotions (‘disciplined’ behaviour)
Culture

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies Emotional cultures:


Hofstede’s Studies  Society associates objective task accomplishment with a human-emotional
Hall’s Studies component
Trompenaars’
Trompenaars’ Studies  Acceptance of a certain openness for human emotions (‘impulsive’ or
Studies
Schwartz’ Studies
‘extroverted’ behaviour)
GLOBE Study
 Influence on verbal communication
Cultural Adaptation

 This dimension is particularly relevant in negotiations because the


incomprehension of these cultural variations may cause severe
misunderstandings.

No. 130

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Hampden-Turner/Trompenaars (2012), Schugk (2014).
Neutral vs. Emotional (2)

Introduction Italien 29
Communication

Frankreich 34
Verbal
Communication
Percentage of
interviewees who
Nonverbal USA 40
Communication do not show
Culture
Singapur 42
emotions at work
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies Hongkong 55


Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies
Niederlande 59
Trompenaars’
Trompenaars’ Studies
Studies Norwegen 61
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study Großbritannien 71


Cultural Adaptation

Indonesien 75

Japan 83

No. 131 0 20 40 60 80 100

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Trompenaars/Hampden-Turner (2012).
Individualism vs. Collectivism (1)

Do we function in a group or as individuals?


Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Individualistic cultures:
Communication
 Welfare and life quality of the individual is the dominating value
Nonverbal
Communication
 A person is defined on personality, achievement, status
Culture
 Individual responsibility / sanction
 Preference of individual decision-making (authoritarian leadership style)
Stereotypes
 Verbal communication is important, silence is abnormal and suspicious
Cultural Studies
 Tendency towards universalism
Hofstede’s Studies
 E.g.: Western Europe, North America
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’
Trompenaars’ Studies
Studies
Collectivistic cultures:
Schwartz’ Studies
 Welfare and life quality of the general public is the dominating value
GLOBE Study
 Integration of the individual into groups (family, companies etc.)
Cultural Adaptation
 High demand for loyalty towards the group
 Responsibility for success / failure is distributed among the group
 Democratic or participative decision-making, process takes longer
 Tendency towards particularism
No. 132
 E.g.: Asian countries
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Adapted from: Hampden-Turner/Trompenaars (2012), Schugk (2014).
Individualism vs. Collectivism (2)

Ägypten 30
Nepal 31
Introduction Mexiko 32
Indien 37
Communication
Japan 39
Brasilien 40
Philippinen 40
Verbal
Communication
Frankreich 41 Percentage of
China 41
Singapure 42 interviewees who
Nonverbal
Portugal
Communication
Indonesien
44
44 prefer liberty and
Culture
Bahrain
Malaysia
44
45 independence of the
Stereotypes
Griechenland
Irland
46
50 individual
Pakistan 52
Cultural Studies Italien 52
Venezuela 53
Hofstede’s Studies Deutschland 53
Norwegen 54
Hall’s Studies Ungarn 56
Belgien 57
Trompenaars’
Trompenaars’ Studies Bulgarien 59
Studies Polen 59
Schweden 60
Schwartz’ Studies
Russland 60
Großbritannien 61
GLOBE Study Spanien 63
Australien 63
Cultural Adaptation Finnland 64
Niederlande 65
Schweiz 66
Dänemark 67
Tschechoslowakei 68
USA 69
Kanada 71
Nigeria 74
No. 133 Israel 89
0 20 40 60 80 100
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase Source: Hampden-Turner/Trompenaars (2012).
Specific vs. Diffuse (1)

Introduction
How separate we keep our private and working lives
Communication

Verbal
Communication
Specific cultures:
Nonverbal
Communication  Strict separation of professional and private life (e.g. family, work etc.)
Culture  Tendency towards monochronic time concept
Stereotypes  E.g.: Germany
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
Diffuse cultures:
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’
 Inseparability of certain areas of life
Trompenaars’ Studies
Studies
 Tendency towards polychronic time concept
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study
 E.g.: Asia, Latin America, Middle East
Cultural Adaptation

No. 134

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Adapted from: Hampden-Turner/Trompenaars (2012), Schugk (2014).
Specific vs. Diffuse (2)

Public  ‘Peach’ (D-type)


Introduction
sphere = level of
Black circle = accessibility
Communication

Private ‘hard shell’


Verbal  ‘Coconut’ (S-type)
Communication sphere
Nonverbal
Communication

Culture
Meeting of two Much ‘private’ information
Stereotypes
D-types shortly after getting to
Cultural Studies know the other one
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’
Trompenaars’ Studies
Studies Meeting of two Slow process of getting
Schwartz’ Studies S-types to know the other one,
GLOBE Study aloofness
Cultural Adaptation

Meeting of a
D- and S-type
No. 135

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Achievement vs. Ascription (1)

Do we have to prove ourselves to receive status or is it


Introduction
given to us?
Communication

Verbal
Communication
Achievement cultures:
Nonverbal
Communication  Achievement of status by individual and actual performance
Culture  Performance highly relevant, e.g. USA: movie heroes (Superman, Batman,
Stereotypes Rambo etc.), the Oscars, victory parades (Norman Schwarzkopf)
Cultural Studies  Management by objectives, hire and fire
Hofstede’s Studies  Lower importance of titles and a person’s origin, e.g.: USA: use of first
Hall’s Studies
names
Trompenaars’
Trompenaars’ Studies
Studies
Schwartz’ Studies Ascription cultures:
GLOBE Study  Status acquired by origin or affiliation (birth, relatives, group membership,
Cultural Adaptation religion, education, job etc.)
 Career path depends on affiliation (e.g. France: ‘grandes écoles’)
 Higher value of titles (e.g. Austria: use academic or occupational titles)
 Influence by ‘grey eminence’ in the background
No. 136

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase Adapted from: Hampden-Turner/Trompenaars (2012), Schugk (2014).
Achievement vs. Ascription (2)

Introduction
Österreich 43

Communication
Russland 53
Brasilien
Verbal
Communication
62 Percentage of
Belgien 64 interviewees who
Nonverbal
Communication Italien 64 regard the respect
Culture China 65 towards a person as
Stereotypes Finnland 65 independent from
Cultural Studies Deutschland 65 his/her origin
Hofstede’s Studies Hongkong 67
Hall’s Studies Schweiz 68
Trompenaars’
Trompenaars’ Studies
Studies
Schweden 69
Schwartz’ Studies Irland 71
GLOBE Study Frankreich 73
Cultural Adaptation Großbritannien 76
USA 77
Australien 79
Dänemark 82
No. 137 0 20 40 60 80 100

Source: Hampden-Turner/Trompenaars (2012).


Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Internal vs. External Control (1)

Introduction
Do we control our environment or are we controlled by it?
Communication

Verbal
Communication
Internally oriented cultures (internal control):
Nonverbal
Communication  Controllability of own fate by will, conviction, inner attitude etc.
Culture  Attempt to control the nature
Stereotypes  Reasons for failure/success attributed to the individual, rather than to external
Cultural Studies circumstances
Hofstede’s Studies  High risk tolerance (in particular in business life)
Hall’s Studies  E.g. USA: ‘American Dream’ (Henry Ford, Thomas Edison, Bill Gates etc.)
Trompenaars’
Trompenaars’ Studies
Studies
Schwartz’ Studies
Externally oriented cultures (external control):
GLOBE Study
 Externally defined fate (fatalism), determined by nature forces, God or provision
Cultural Adaptation
 Low risk tolerance (in particular in business life)
 Successful imitation and continuous improvement of the existing
 E.g. Japan: Kaizen, Ju-jitsu, Judo, Karaoke etc.

No. 138

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase Adapted from: Hampden-Turner/Trompenaars (2012), Schugk (2014).
Internal vs. External Control (2)

Yugoslawien 47
Introduction
Russland 50
Communication
Indien 52
Verbal
Communication
Schweden 53 Percentage of
Hongkong 54 interviewees believing
Nonverbal
Communication China 55 that luck does not
Culture Polen 56 contribute to achieving
Stereotypes
Belgien 56 a leadership role
Niederlande 57
Cultural Studies
Japan 57
Hofstede’s Studies
Deutschland 57
Hall’s Studies Schweiz 61
Trompenaars’
Trompenaars’ Studies Frankreich 63
Studies
Schwartz’ Studies
Italien 69
Korea 73
GLOBE Study
Israel 74
Cultural Adaptation
Großbritannien 75
Australien 79
Kanada 83
USA 84

No. 139 0 20 40 60 80 100

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase Source: Hampden-Turner/Trompenaars (2012).


Sequential vs. Synchronic

Introduction
Do we do things one at a time or several things at once?
Communication

Verbal
Communication
Sequentially oriented cultures:
Nonverbal
Communication
 Time as linear course of consecutive happenings
Culture
 Efficient time management, appointments and schedule obligations are
Stereotypes respected, time is a economic factor (time is money)
Cultural Studies  Similar to Hall’s monochronic cultures
Hofstede’s Studies
 E.g. USA: Henry Ford, Frederick Taylor
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’
Trompenaars’ Studies
Studies
Synchronic oriented cultures:
Schwartz’ Studies
 Several things can happen at the same time, interdependencies or
GLOBE Study
overlapping through parallel activities
Cultural Adaptation
 Reaching of objectives depends more on quality of relations than on
maintaining precise schedules
 Similar to Hall’s polychronic cultures

No. 140

Adapted from: Hampden-Turner/Trompenaars (2012), Schugk (2014).


Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase
Criticism of Trompenaars’ Studies

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication
 Representativeness? (survey of seminar participants)

Genesis and operationalisation of culture dimensions (validity and


Nonverbal
Communication 
Culture purposeful measurements?)
Stereotypes
 Very brief description of methods used
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
 Missing aggregate values for the individual dimensions
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’
Trompenaars’ Studies
Studies
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 141

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Questions to Check for Learning

Introduction

Communication 1. Which are the cultural dimensions proposed by Trompenaars?


Verbal
Communication 2. Define the terms ‘Universalism’ and ‘Particularism’!
Nonverbal
Communication 3. What is the difference between neutrally and emotionally oriented
Culture cultures?
4. What does ‘Specific culture’ vs. ‘Diffuse culture’ stand for?
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies 5. How can achievement and ascription be characterised in the


Hall’s Studies
intercultural context?
Trompenaars’
Trompenaars’ Studies
Studies 6. Describe the concept of internally vs. externally and sequentially vs.
Schwartz’ Studies synchronically oriented cultures!
GLOBE Study
7. Which similarities exist between the studies of Trompenaars,
Cultural Adaptation
Hofstede and Hall?

No. 142

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Comparative Cultural Studies by Schwartz

Introduction
 Israeli American social psychologist and
Communication
intercultural researcher, author of a
Verbal
Communication theory about universal human values
Nonverbal
Communication  Examination of importance of 56 values
Culture
in 49 countries with 35.000 participants
Stereotypes
Shalom H. Schwartz
Cultural Studies (* 1940)
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies Three cultural dimensions:


Schwartz’ Studies
 Embeddedness vs. autonomy
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation
 Hierarchy vs. egalitarianism
 Mastery vs. harmony

No. 143

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Embeddedness vs. Autonomy

 Description of natural relations between


Introduction the individual and the group
Communication

Verbal
Communication Embeddedness Autonomy
Nonverbal
Communication  In embedded cultures, the individual  In autonomous cultures, the
Culture
is integrated into the group individual is perceived as an
autonomous and defined entity
Stereotypes  Importance of life is linked with
Cultural Studies
participation in the group  Importance of life is linked with
search for uniqueness
Hofstede’s Studies  Embeddedness emphasises mutual
Hall’s Studies
dependence of actors, to let things  In autonomous cultures, humans are
happen encouraged to follow up their unique
Trompenaars’ Studies
ideas and to express their personal
 In embedded cultures, the focus is on
Schwartz’ Studies
Schwartz’ Studies
interests
maintaining of status quo of social
GLOBE Study
relations  Examples: Switzerland, France,
Cultural Adaptation
Spain
 Examples: Cyprus, Singapore,
Georgia

 Similar to Hofstede’s and Trompenaars’ individualism and collectivism


No. 144

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Schwartz (1999).
Hierarchy vs. Egalitarianism

Introduction
 Type of ensuring responsible behaviour
among the members of a group
Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Hierarchy Egalitarianism
Communication

Culture
 The unequal distribution of power is  Humans see themselves as morally
legitimated equal and have a voluntary obligation
Stereotypes
towards others
Cultural Studies
 Hierarchy emphasises the
dependence of humans from those  In egalitarian cultures, the individual
Hofstede’s Studies
with higher or lower status to fulfil is seen as an autonomous decision-
Hall’s Studies their social role maker who voluntarily assumes civil
Trompenaars’ Studies roles
 Examples: China, India, Thailand
Schwartz’ Studies
Schwartz’ Studies  In egalitarian cultures, humans are
GLOBE Study expected to accept every other
Cultural Adaptation
human as morally equal
 Examples: Italy, Finland, Denmark

 Similar to Hofstede’s power distance


No. 145

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Schwartz (1999).
Mastery vs. Harmony

Introduction
 Regulation of relations between humans and their
Communication surrounding natural environment
Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication Mastery Harmony
Culture
 Human is encouraged to overcome,  Humans are encouraged to
Stereotypes
change and exploit nature understand, to relate with and to
Cultural Studies integrate into their natural
 Effort of individuals and groups to
environment
Hofstede’s Studies
exploit social and material
Hall’s Studies possibilities  Individuals are encouraged to relate
to their social and natural
Trompenaars’ Studies
 Examples: Canada, USA, Japan
Schwartz’ Studies
Schwartz’ Studies
environment in a solidary and non-
exploitative way
GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation
 Examples: Slovenia, Estonia, Czech
Republic

 Similar to Tompenaars’ internal vs. external control


No. 146

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Schwartz (1999).
Questions to Check for Learning

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication
1. Explain the cultural dimension ‘Embeddedness vs. Autonomy’!
Nonverbal
Communication
2. What characterises the cultural dimension ‘Hierarchy vs.
Culture
egalitarianism’?
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies
3. Explain the characteristics of the dimension ‘Mastery vs. Harmony’!
Hofstede’s Studies 4. Which similarities do exist between the cultural dimensions of
Hall’s Studies Schwartz and those from Hofstede and Trompenaars?
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 147

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Comparative Cultural GLOBE Study

Introduction  Global Leadership and Organizational


Communication Behaviour Effectiveness Research Program
Verbal
Communication  1991 initiated by Robert J. House, Wharton
Nonverbal
University Pennsylvania (USA)
Communication

Culture
 Empirical study to examine the relationship
between society culture, corporate culture and
Stereotypes
management styles
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies  170 researchers from 62 countries interviewed


Hall’s Studies
17.300 managers in 951 organisations
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies  To differentiate societies and organisations nine cultural dimensions were
GLOBE Study
GLOBE Study
outlined (mainly based on Hofstede’s dimensions)
Cultural Adaptation
 Additionally, six global management dimensions were introduced
 Categorisation of certain countries and national cultures into ten cluster-
regions

No. 148

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: House et al. (2004).
Cultural Dimensions of the GLOBE Study (1)

Introduction  Uncertainty avoidance: the extent to which a society, organisation or


Communication
group relies on social norms, rules and procedures to alleviate the
Verbal
unpredictability of future events
Communication
 Power distance: the extent to which a community accepts and
endorses authority, power differences and status privileges
Nonverbal
Communication

Culture  Institutional collectivism: the degree to which organisational and


Stereotypes societal institutional practices encourage and reward collective
Cultural Studies distribution of resources and collective action
Hofstede’s Studies  In-group collectivism: the degree to which individuals express pride,
Hall’s Studies loyalty, and cohesiveness in their organisations or families
Trompenaars’ Studies
 Gender egalitarianism: the degree to which a collective minimises
Schwartz’ Studies gender inequality
GLOBE Study
GLOBE Study
 Future orientation: the degree to which a collectivity encourages and
Cultural Adaptation
rewards future-oriented behaviours such as planning and delaying
gratification

 These cultural dimensions are similar to Hofstede’ dimensions


No. 149

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: House et al. (2004).
Cultural Dimensions of the GLOBE Study (2)

Introduction

Communication
 Completely new cultural dimensions introduced by the Globe study:
Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication
 Assertiveness: the degree to which individuals are assertive,
Culture
confrontational and aggressive in their relationships with others
Stereotypes

Cultural Studies
 Performance orientation: reflects the extent to which a community
encourages and rewards innovation, high standards, excellence and
Hofstede’s Studies
performance improvement
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies  Humane orientation: the degree to which an organisation or society


Schwartz’ Studies encourages and rewards individuals for being fair, altruistic, friendly,
GLOBE Study
GLOBE Study
generous, caring and kind to others
Cultural Adaptation

No. 150

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: House et al. (2004).
Cultural Dimensions of the GLOBE Study (3)

The GLOBE study differentiates between practices (current state) and


Introduction
values (desired state) of predominant moral concepts in a society and in
Communication
organisations/companies.
Verbal
Communication The respondents assessed the real situation (current state) and their wishful
Nonverbal
thinking (desired state) in both categories.
Communication

Culture Performance Humane


Assertiveness
Stereotypes Orientation Orientation
Cultural Studies Practices Values Practices Values Practices Values
Hofstede’s Studies
Poland 4,06 3,90 3,89 6,12 3,61 5,30
Hall’s Studies
Germany (W) 4,55 3,09 4,25 6,01 3,18 5,46
Trompenaars’ Studies
Canada 4,05 4,15 4,49 6,15 4,49 5,64
Schwartz’ Studies
USA 4,55 4,32 4,49 6,14 4,17 5,53
GLOBE Study
GLOBE Study
Russia 3,68 2,83 3,39 5,54 3,94 5,59
Cultural Adaptation
Australia 4,28 3,81 4,36 5,89 4,28 5,58
England 4,15 3,70 4,08 5,90 3,72 5,43
Japan 3,59 5,56 4,22 5,17 4,30 5,41
No. 151
China 3,76 5,44 4,45 5,67 4,36 5,32

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: House et al. (2004).
Cluster-Regions of the GLOBE Study

Anglo Australia, Canada, England, Ireland,


competitive and result-oriented
Introduction
(worldwide) New Zealand, South Africa (white), USA
Communication
Latin France, Israel, Italy, Portugal, Spain,
value individual autonomy
Verbal
Communication
Europe Switzerland (French speaking)
Nordic high priority on long-term success,
Nonverbal Denmark, Finland, Sweden
Communication (Europe) women treated with greater equality
Culture
Germanic Austria, Germany (E + W), Netherlands, value competition and aggressiveness
Stereotypes (Europe) Switzerland (German speaking) and are more result-oriented
Cultural Studies Eastern Albania, Georgia, Greece, Hungary, forceful, supportive of co-workers, treat
Hofstede’s Studies Europa Kazakhstan, Poland, Russia, Slovenia women with equality
Argentina, Bolivia, Brasilia, Columbia,
Hall’s Studies
Latin loyal and devoted to their families and
Costa-Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador,
Trompenaars’ Studies America Guatemala, Mexico, Venezuela
similar groups
Schwartz’ Studies
devoted and loyal to their own people,
Middle East Egypt, Kuwait, Morocco, Qatar, Turkey women afforded less status
GLOBE Study
GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation Sub-Sahara- Namibia, Nigeria, South Africa (black concerned and sensitive to others,
Africa population), Zambia, Zimbabwe demonstrate strong family loyalty
Southern India, Indonesia, Iran, Malaysia, strong family and deep concern for
Asia Philippines, Thailand their communities

No. 152
Confucian- China, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, result-driven, encourage group
Asia South Korea, Taiwan working together over individual goals
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase Source: House et al. (2004), Northouse (2007), Fischer/Furrer-Küttel (2009).
Criticism of the GLOBE-Study

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication
 Limitation on just three branches (data from three
Nonverbal
Communication indigenous companies in each country representing the
Culture
financial services, food processing and
Stereotypes
telecommunications)
Cultural Studies
 Limitation on managers of the middle management
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies  Consideration of sub-cultures only in part


Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies
 Not representative for the whole population
GLOBE Study
GLOBE Study

Cultural Adaptation

No. 153

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Questions to Check for Learning

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication

Nonverbal
1. What characterises the GLOBE study?
Communication

Culture
2. In which cultural dimensions does the GLOBE study differ
Stereotypes from Hofstede’s cultural dimensions?
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies 3. Describe the new cultural dimensions introduced by the


Hall’s Studies GLOBE study!
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies 4. Which country clusters were find as a result of the GLOBE
GLOBE Study
GLOBE Study
study?
Cultural Adaptation

No. 154

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Cultural Adaptation

Introduction Acculturation = process of adaptation to a foreign culture


Communication

Verbal
Communication
Positive
Nonverbal
Communication

Culture

Stereotypes

Cultural Studies
a
Degree of
Hofstede’s Studies
b
acculturation A
Hall’s Studies c
Trompenaars’ Studies

Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural
Cultural Adaptation
Adaptation

Negative

Euphoria Culture Acculturation Stabilisation


shock
No. 155

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Küsters (1998).
Stages of Acculturation
1) Stage of euphoria:
 Excitement through contact with new country/new culture
Introduction  Feeling of interest, optimism, ‘honeymoon’-like euphoria
Communication

Verbal
2) Cultural shock:
Communication  Increasing adjustment strains and problems
Nonverbal  Routines of everyday life come to the fore
Communication
 Crisis due to high uncertainty, helplessness, hostility towards new
Culture environment
Stereotypes  Outsider role in professional environment
Cultural Studies
 Cultural shock as usual stage in the adaptation process
Hofstede’s Studies
3) Stage of acculturation:
Hall’s Studies
 First adoption/acceptance of some local values
Trompenaars’ Studies  Recovery from experienced crisis
Schwartz’ Studies
 Increasing feeling of social integration in new environment
 Growing language skills and self-confidence
GLOBE Study

Cultural
Cultural Adaptation
Adaptation
4) Stage of stabilisation:
 Stage of maximal possible cultural adaptation
 Achievement of ‘host communication competence’ (ability to effectively
communicate own experience to others in the host society)
 Realistic assessment of advantages and disadvantages of the new culture
No. 156
 Measurability of individual level of acculturation by different determinants
(e.g. feeling, mood, stress perception etc.)
Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase Source: Schugk (2014).
Types of Acculturation

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication
Preservation of own
Nonverbal
Communication cultural identity
Culture

Stereotypes Yes No
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
Establishment Yes Integration Assimilation
Hall’s Studies
of positive
intercultural
Trompenaars’ Studies

Marginali-
Schwartz’ Studies
relations No Separation
GLOBE Study
sation
Cultural
Cultural Adaptation
Adaptation

No. 157

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Berry (1990).
Process of Reacculturation

Introduction

Communication  Problem of acculturation after return into the home culture


Verbal
Communication  Conscious and unconscious change of behaviour through life and
Nonverbal work in a foreign culture
Communication

Culture  Higher position in host culture as possible reason of acculturation


Stereotypes problems
Cultural Studies
− Higher power, authority, independence
Hofstede’s Studies

Hall’s Studies
− Higher salaries
Trompenaars’ Studies
− Non-fulfilment of professional advancement after return
Schwartz’ Studies
 Reintegration seminars to facilitate re-entry
GLOBE Study

Cultural
Cultural Adaptation
Adaptation

No. 158

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Schugk (2014).
Three-Stage-Model of Reacculturation

‘Returnee shock’
Introduction
1) Stage of ‘Naive Integration’:
Communication

Verbal
 Return with willingness and openness to reintegration
Stage of superficial readjustment
Communication

Nonverbal
Communication

Culture
2) Stage of ‘Reintegration Shock’:
Stereotypes
 Increasing incomprehension by colleagues
Cultural Studies

Hofstede’s Studies
 Arrogant attitude of returnee towards his/her environment
Hall’s Studies  Increasing of aggressions, dissatisfaction and disappointment
Trompenaars’ Studies  Reinforcement of negative feelings due to unfulfilled expectations
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study
3) Stage of ‘Real Integration’:
Cultural
Cultural Adaptation
Adaptation
 Real readjustment due to adjustment of expectations on reality
 New-won self-confidence
 Danger of relapse into the second stage
No. 159

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase


Source: Hirsch (2003).
Questions to Check for Learning

Introduction

Communication

Verbal
Communication
1. What the term ‘Acculturation’ stand for?
Nonverbal
Communication

Culture 2. Describe the process of acculturation!


Stereotypes

Cultural Studies
3. Which problems are associated with the phenomenon of
Hofstede’s Studies
‘Reacculturation’?
Hall’s Studies

Trompenaars’ Studies
4. Which are the stages of the so-called ‘Returnee shock’?
Schwartz’ Studies

GLOBE Study

Cultural
Cultural Adaptation
Adaptation

No. 160

Prof. Dr. Heiko Haase

You might also like