Mandibular Edentulous Anatomy and Modified
Impression Technique
RP. Renner, D.DS.
Making an accurate impression of the mandibular
‘edentulous dental arch of “the difficult lower jaw.”
presents unique problems for the dental practitioner
‘This arch isthe ultimate foundation upon which
removable prosthesis is fabricated. Anatomic, phy
iologic, surgical, and psychologic considerations of
the edentulous patient as well asthe expertise of the
denis all playa significant rle in impression making
and ultimate patient acceptance of a mandibular com-
plete denture
When a mandibular prosthesis is not satisfactory
the cause can often be traced to faulty impression
‘making procedures. In order to minimize a technical
failure on the part ofthe dentist a careful corelation
between the anatomic limits ofthe denture foundation
and the edentulous custom tay used to make the
impression must be made. The purpose ofthis article
js twofold: (J) to review both the pertinent static an-
stomic landmarks ofthe mandibular denture space and
the dynamic nature of muscular influence on the bor-
ders of the custom tray $0 that impression making
‘becomes more predictable and; (2) to describe a mod-
ified impression aking technique for patients with
severely reduced residual ridges.
‘Anatomie considerations
Many oral structures change drastically when a patient
becomes completely edentulous. The bony foundation
(residual ridges) forthe denture, regardless if the pa-
tient is treated with prostheses or not, can be cha
‘acterized by a continual reduction of these ridges
throughout the patients life.” As a consequence of
‘continual resilal ridge reduction (RRR) the facial
muscles (lips and cheeks) become unsupported and
have a tendency to collapse into the oral cavity. At
the same time the tongue expands its volume to fill
the space formerly occupied by the dentition and sup-
porting alveolar bone. The oral cavity of the eden-
tulous patient therefore develops the so-called typical
denture space (Fig. 1). The dynamic nature of the
tissues and muscles surrounding this typical denture
space determines the form of the polished surface
‘contours ofthe denture. According to Fish the critical
factor in denture stability is not its anatomic foun-
dation (residual ridges and mucoperisteal covering)
but rather muscular function acting on the polished
surfaces and teth.
‘The character of the mandibular residual ridge of
1 patient who has been edentulous fora long period
‘of time is one in which te erst ofthe ridge becomes
almost at the same level as the surrounding muscu-
lature (mentalis and mylohyoid), thus allowing the
muscles to easily dislodge the denture. RRR also re-
‘duces the amount of firm mucoperiosteum attached to
‘bone causing usually well defined buccal and lingual
vestbules to be eliminated. These major changes in
the oral anatomy make it dificult fr the dental prac~
ttione to distinguish the anatomic and functional lim-
its ofthe denture space (Fig. 2).
(QUINTESSENCE OF DENTAL TECHNOLOGY. MAY/JUNE 1987
qoday jeneds
17to collapse ofthe buccinator and alteration of the tongue form,
According to Brill, Tryde, and Cantor’ denture sta-
bility is a result ofthe muscular forces that act and
relate tothe different surfaces and borders of the man-
ibular denture. “These are (1) te pressure receiving
Surface (the occlusal table), (2) the pressure tans-
‘mitting surface (the primary supporting surface or
basal seat), and finally, (3) the secondary supporting
surface that is comprised ofthe polished surfaces of
the denture and the lingual and buccal surfaces ofthe
teeth. The junction of the primary supporting surface
fd the secondary supporting surfaces is called the
“denture borde
{erent groups, (1
ble 1). A review ofthese muscle groups and how they
will influence the retention and stability of a mandib-
ular denture is important for both the dentist during
impression making and the dental laboratory techni-
cian when making custom trays,’ sting teeth." and
‘creating the denture polished surface contours.” A de-
scription ofthe paired stabilizing and dislodging mus-
cles will begin at the midline of the mandibular an-
terior labial sulcus, proceed posteriorly along. the
buccal denture border, ross the retromola pad, ex-
tend inferiorly inthe retromlohyoid sulcus and pro-
ceed anteriorly on the lingual denture border towards
the lingual frenum,
Fig. 1 Diagrammatic representation ofa mediolateral rss secon twough he sulin region ofthe st molars. (A) Anatomic
Tomtonships in the dentate sate and (@) inthe edentsous sate, Observe tne narrowing ofthe potential space for compete
entures ve
) stabilizing and (2) dislodging (Ta-
3)
“fhe musculature that envelops and limits the po
Ay tential demure space can be classified into two di-
QUINTESSENCE OF DENTAL TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 11 NUMBER 3The labial fremum interrupts the alveotabial sulcus
inthe region ofthe mandibular incisors. This usually
twiangularshaped (apex pointing superior) fold of
mucous membrane covers various types of connective
tissue. Consequently this frenum follows the func
tional movement of the lower lip, In cases of severe
RRR the frenum is transformed into broad bands of
tissve located atthe top of the residual ridge and can
act as a dislodging force when the lips are moved
sideways or pursed,
The fibers of the mentalis muscle ran between the
frontal surface of the mandible, betwcen the canine
fminence and incisive fossa, infenorly, anterior and
medially to insert int the skin ofthe chin, Right and
Teft muscle fibers fuse in the midline. When there has
been severe RRR the mental muscle i lcated a the
‘rest of the residual ridge rather than in the reflection
‘of the alveolabial sulcus. When this muscle contacts
to clevate the chin it can markedly decrease both the
height and width of the anterior labial vestibule
(Figs. 3 and 4),
The ies of he ncn briny msc
run between the frontal surface ofthe mandible athe
canine eminence and run anteriorly and Iaterally 10
the oral commissure where they fuse with fibers of
the orbicularis oris muscle. Like the mentalis, espe:
=?
q
[ee
‘The modiolus (Latin for nave of a wheel) “because
[ight muscles radiate from i lke the spokes ofa wheel
{rom the hub, forms a distinct conical prominence at
the comer of the mouth, and in lean muscular young
men it can be easly seen whenever they move theit
lips or cheeks. defining the crescent fold as the coF-
ners of the mouth."* The upper spokes ofthe wheel,
the caninus and zygomaticus muscles fx the modiolus
firmly to the bony maxilla while the lower spokes,
the trangularis muscle fixes it to the inferior border
of the mandible (see Fig. 8). When either the buc
inator or orbiculais onis muscle is contracted the
‘modiolus must be fixed. “This form of fixation for the
‘modiolus, however, has an enormous advantage, for
it may be fixed in any one of a variety of positions
either forward or backward, up or down within a con
siderable range depending upon the action of the
M. cruciatus madioi, so thatthe orbiculars ori can
‘operate from a forward point of origin if we wish 0
say ‘Oh!" or drink soup froma spoon, oritean operate
from a backward postion if one should wish to say
"Ee" or to play a coronet or bite the lower lip. Which.
fion trough the skull In the area ofthe mandibular
‘symphysis. (M) montais musci; (0) oricularis mus-
de; (7) tongue: and (G) genioglossus muscle. Con
{racture of ether the mentale o genioglossus muscles
Severely iis the potential alveolabal or ingualsucus
‘or a mandibular denture
170 QUINTESSENCE OF DENTAL TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 11
ver position the modiolus is fixed in, the orbiculris
is tre to carry out the delicate movements of speech
for which its intricate internal structure is so beaut
fully adapted."
fe has a “horseshoe-shaped
or crescent-shaped origin, the manillary fibers origi-
nate in the mauillay first molar region at the base
ofthe alveolar process and run posteriorly and infe
riorly distal tothe maxillary tuberosity to inser into
the pterygomandibularraphae and then it runs to ter-
sninate on the external oblique line of the mandible
‘nthe fst mola region, Almost all bers of the buc-
cinator run horizontally from their origin to insert at
the modiolus located lateral othe comer ofthe mouth
‘After passing through this knot of facial muscles
the superior fibers pass into the upper and the infer
fiers nto the lower ip. When the buccinator contracts
the cheeks are pressed vigorously against the teeth
and alveolar process, The buceinator muscle can be
considered an accessory muscle of mastication by po-
sitioning the food bolus over the occlusal surfaces of
the teth and returning escaped food from the buccal
vestibule fo the occlusal table. The action of the m0-
Alu isto prevent escape of the food bolus from the
comer ofthe mouth as the buecinator moves food up
and over the occlusal table
‘The inferior fibers influence the shape ofthe denture
border from buccal frena to the pterygomandibular
raphae. Inthe edentulous patient much of the attach:
‘ment of the inferior fibers of the buceinator to the
extemal oblique line is lox. The denture base in this
region can, therefore, be “naximally extended tothe
extemal oblique line to cver the primary denture
bearing area, the buccal shelf, without these muscle
fibers dislodging the denture. Posteiorly the buccal
flange can extend tothe masseteric groove while an-
‘erory itis narrowed by the buccal enum and action
Fig. 4 The oxgins of tho ments muscle biateraly
hhave been outined using a color transfer applicator
demonstrating ther position relative to the Gest o he
residual nage
NuMeer 3Fig. 6 Diagrammatic representation ofa mediolateral
‘088 section through the skuln region of the crest of
the mandibular resioua idge lusrating the anatorsc
structures around a manaibular denture, (8) Buccal
shell area; (L) retromyiyold area: (7) tongue; (E)
esophagus; 1) massetor muscle (2) intemal perygod
muscle; (2) stoglossus muscle. (4) palatogiossus
(6) superior constrictor ft
‘of the modiolus. The bulk of the buceinator muscle
itelf is great stabilizer ofa mandibular denture when
it acts against a well contoured and polished buccal
surface
‘The masseter muscle defines the postenoe extent of
the mandibular buceal denture border. The masseter
muscle originates on the zygoma and runs posteriorly,
inferiorly, and laterally to insert onthe lateral bordet
ofthe mandible. Itformsa sling forthe mandible with
its counterpart the intemal pterygoid on the medial
surface ofthe mandible. A definite proove (masseter
groove) can be seen in the region of the mandibular
Second and third molars when the muscle is con-
tracted, which causes the denture space to turn acutely
medially toward the retromolar pad. Ifa mandibular
denture impression is. made with the masseter in a
relaxed postion it will dislodge the denture when it
contracts by forcefully pushing the buccinator and
cheek mucosa anteriorly. The masseter muscle 1s a
Aislodging force on a mandibular denture (Figs. 5
and 6)
he mandibular denture should extend oad cover
the rermmoar pod. It should 90 be overextended
Ahly tormplage on the pterygomandiblar raphae
Wen tremolo prove secon
anor forthe mandibular entre Deause i ona
imei tse bundles which are frm and he f=
nous atachment of the temporais muscle (Fi. 7).
‘Ie perygomandibular raphae 1s 2 disinet TOK! of
tat in fot of and pall othe anterior pla of
the mouth and conta the on of oh the bac
pate micle ranting ater to form the bulk of
the check and pei contro muscle running pos
teary ard medal to frm he scala wall ofthe
platy. When te mouth vopened widely the raphe
(arctched lke a sting and may ft the distal end of
the retomolar pad. I the dentre extends ovr this
Store i may te dodged sien the mouth 1s
Spent wiely ain Yow
“The muscles which it the denture space in the
posterior lingual area of the mandible, termed the
feromsloyoid area of lateral throat frm. ae dis-
Iedgingin mare. The shape ofthe mandibular denture
inthis aren is very del 10 captre de 10 the
Complex muscular actvty bounding the space. The
inetalpergod,paatglsus,sploxtoses and
sper contrcor mle a the Uiloing mu-
cles ce Fi.
ema ppg el ges om
prerygnd fons of te sll and un infer pose
ody, and Inerlyw set on the eet ura:
Ofte manuibulr angle fom asliog fr he man-
ible with counterpart the master on the lta
Sure ofthe mandible As the mandible Is opened
tmaximumly the ltrs pterygoid defies and mits
te meat prt dial pet of he evr pce.
he pln futher imi the poet
‘econ ee nese Tn eects
th poglnal ach (saa ely ro eo
iin ete aca cof aa
Sips Maopingiond ascents
firs atta sone ae Se
Reece eee meee eiademr
Sar ban si ond care. Wes tice
‘oasis etsing Gotten
ict stots an pare pera
iesclgat cio iCheoiers
Pmt eg on he so
procs an trary w recreate sa
Feng! muscle of the tong. It fancone ihe
Siar fashion ss the pales muse mt
the dene pce te poser gu reson
The infenerprian of espero comic m
Glen ataced othe mana is ncn he
staeo th poster acl nga sles et
contac. When a pn eat tthe slogans
ted super conto mans athe tae
172 QUINTESSENCE OF DENTAL TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 11. NUMBER 3Emp con nae a
stunts cy tc
Sonepat wach
emai nes der aR
vacancies
itp boo ner ge
fro cl a ot py ed
Paes pe seed
ein
tine ape of mat
etry ps ie eo
dale atp Tees
ram tne ee
‘Chere an it pono
Te cre mc te te
pl ttn bret
te in me ri ep gy
eT ornt g ps e
te re ep ee
Sel mide rte mah an ae
i pee tiga tis te dh
te ce
Theis maces feng: gia
erica, od ane), an in ce planes ih
angst ne aera teat wil ther
sustain orale the hp of te og
When theresa corition oh ati ofthe
cutis nd inti muscles fhe ou one can
fave powerless he ings of
4 dent isp imo counteracted equal
pres fo th buna (heater ano
bili ors) ane a mandibular dene
willbe dodge, Tis antagonistic eft of pose
CQUNTESSENCE OF Dew’
‘os mur en
cei
pores tiae g
serene
i pcreencase i
cn con ma
scr sony cage
Fe tay snd
smerny cae
ms epee
foci ced
Sc eh nn
in a Doe pe
Clinical procedure
|, The det makes a eininary impression ofthe
anil detal ach in eter moding com
Pound, impression plaster, or inverse bydo-
coli wing an open mouth impresion chique
TECHNOLOGY NAYIJUNE 1967172stn ofthe mandibular an
in erversibie hyrocollnd
| Fig. 8 A proimsnary ing
‘tome tissues mack
Fig. 10 Acustom tray is mace on a dental sone cast
i ‘upon which the mits tothe denture have been de
sented, in atopotymenng aryic rein.
Fig. 12. The mandibular custom tray is visual in
Spected for stability and lack of over or underexten.
ions n hs instance ovoroxtonions have been
{ectedin tho rtromyiohyoid areas bilaterally provening
{passive seating on the odorous tissues,
Fig. 9. The ints the mandibular denture ara penciled
Ion the diagnose cast before rat wax i paced,
Fig. 11. handle can bo ade wih autopalymerzing
acre resin oF a prefrr 9d aluminum hand can be
added. Any hand shoud not inertore mth the pa
tents ower ip or maxilary residual ge,
Fig, 19. The retromolar pad nas been dried and ou
lined by means ofa col tansterappictor
174 QUINTESSENCE OF DENTAL TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 11 NUMBER 3Fig. 14 The massotenc groove, buccal shel area
| and extemal obique inw have been marked a smiar
fashion win calor ranster appear
| (Fig. 8. The aim sgn an impression of he
| tal aoe denture ering ae with de
Laboratory procedure
1. An autopolymenzing serie resin mandibular
‘custom trays constructed on a dental stone cast
made from this preliminary (anatomic) impres
‘on ofthe mandibular dental arch.* Cae is taken
to red the anatomic limits of the potential den
ture-bearing area including the reromoar pas,
buccal shel, residual ridge, buccal labial, and
Tingual fren, lingual seus, and retomylohyoid
ace (Fig. 3). The custom tay should cover the
retromolar pad emily, be several millimeters
Short of the labial denture extension and extend
to the fll depth inthe lingual sulcus, and be
ppropmately relieved allow movement without
restriction ofthe various frena (Fig. 10). When
the width of the residual ridge is very narow in
the anterior region the tray must be reinforced o¢
thickened to ensure tabilty and prevent facture
2. An acrylic resin o preformed aluminum handle
Stould be atached tothe top ofthe custom tay
land be contoured so that doesnot interfer with
movements ofthe lip (Fig. 11)
Clinical procedure
4. The dentist should try inthe custom tray ita
corally and comect for any over and underexten
sions inthe various sulci before modeling com
pound is added tothe way. The tay should be
Seated with light finger pressure and the dentist
Should. proceed around the dental arch ia a
Planned order to check the limits ofthe custom
tray (Fig. 12), Diret observation and clinical
(QUINTESSENCE OF
Fig. 15. Extra palpation ofthe custom tay in the
fesion ofthe molars an addtional method ascertain
bverestensions beyond the extemal oblque line
palpation are the methods employed to check a
fustom tay for over or underettensions. A con-
‘enient stating place isthe rettomolar pads bi
laterally (Fig. 13)-A making tick (color transfer
applicator) impregnated wit a gentan violet dye
an te used to outline the extent of various an-
tome structures and limits to the denture and be
easily transfered 0 the ay
ach anatomic structure is dried with gauze
marked with the color transfer stick ad then the
Ary custom tray i inserted and seated with ight
fing pressure. It is removed and any overe
tensions beyond the anatomic limits are adjusted
with acrylic imming burs mounted in slow
‘poe dental handpiece. The retomola pad. mas
eters groove, buccal self various fena, labial
nd aneio lingual sulcus can be adjusted by this
method (Fig. 18)
Extension beyond the extemal oblique line can
be also determined by external palpation. With
the tray seated inraealy the inde finger can be
tun from the border ofthe mandible inthe molar
region up the facial skin 1 feel the presence of
the buceal border ofthe custom tray. When the
teay is overextended beyond the external oblique
lin the way an be realy palpated ateral fo the
body of the mandible (Fig. 13)
The retomylohyoid and mylohyoid areas can
be adjusted by the use of ether disclosing wax
applied tthe borders or via series of small
functional adjustments to the tay Uni the cs
tom tray is stable to dislodgement when tongue
andior swallowing movements are made by the
Patient. The patient should not be encouraged
to make exaggerated tongue movements when
‘checking the lingual extension ofthe tray. Placing
the tongue outside the mouth wil force the dentist
to overtion the tay, creating shortened borders
ALTECHNOLOGY MAYIJUNE 1967 175Fig. 17. A static impression of the denture-besring
Fig. 16 Modeling plastcis softened overa gas burner
asues is made using modeling pastic within the on
and placed ito the tse Iting surface ofthe man
|