Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Precipitation
Precipitation
PRECIPITATION
1
Chapter 2: Learning Outcomes
2
Symons Gauge
Rain Non - Recording
Gauge
Recording Weighing Bucket
Tipping Bucket
Float Type
Tipping
Weighing bucket
bucket
Tipping
bucket
Recording Gauges - Advantages
16
Instrumental errors
Dent in receivers
Frictional effects
Point Measurements
• Data from a single nearby rain gauge are often
sufficiently representative to allow their use in
the design of small projects.
Areal Measurements
• Several precipitation gauges are employed over
very large catchments. Weighted average of
these gauge measurements are used to
estimate the precipitation.
Variation of rainfall
24
A 99mm
B 75mm
D 62.5mm
C 85mm
Areal Measurements - Thiessen method
29
Areal Measurements - Thiessen method
30
B 75mm
D 62.5mm
C 85mm
Average rainfall depth
31
Average rainfall depth – Isohyetal Method
32
Px P1 P2 ... Pm
1
m
• Using data from three surrounding gauges
should give good results
Normal Ratio Method
38
1 Nx Nx Nx
Px P1 P2 ... Pm
m N1 N2 Nm
• Nx = normal (longterm) annual rainfall at station x
• Nm = normal (longterm) annual rainfall at the m surrounding
stations
• Pm = storm rain at station m
A minimum of three surrounding stations are generally used in the
normal ratio method
Example
39
Station A B C D E
Storm precipitation (cm) 9.7 8.3 ---- 11.7 8.0
Normal Annual precipitation (cm) 100.3 109.5 93.5 125.7 117.5
Solution
42
• Determine first whether arithmetic mean or normal ratio method is to be
applied.
• 10% of Nc = 93.5 x 10/100 = 9.35
• After the addition of 10% of Nc we get 93.5 + 9.35 = 102.85
• And by subtracting 10% we get a value of 84.15
• So Na, Nb, Nd or Ne values are to be checked for the range 102.85 to 84.15.
• If any value of Na, Nb, Nd or Ne lies beyond this range, then normal ratio method
would be used. It is clear from data in table above that Nb, Nd and Ne values
are out of this range so the normal ratio method is applicable
Station A B C D E
Storm precipitation (cm) 9.7 8.3 ---- 11.7 8.0
Normal Annual precipitation (cm) 100.3 109.5 93.5 125.7 117.5
-10% +10%
84.15 93.5 102.85
1 93.5 93.5 93.5 93.5
Pc (9 . 7 ) (8 . 3) (11 . 7 ) (8 . 0 )
4 100.3 109.5 125.7 117.5
Pc 7.8 cm
Example
43
• Pa = 10.7 cm Na = 112 cm
• Pb = 8.90 cm Nb = 93.5 cm
• Pc = 12.2 cm Nc = 119.9 cm
• Px = ? Nx = 97.8 cm
• 10% of Nx = 97.8 x 10/100 = 9.78 cm.
• Nx - Na = 97.8 - 112 = -14.2 cm is More than + 10% of Nx
(no need of calculating Nx - Nb and Nx – Nc)
Slope = m2
Correction factor m1
Slope = m1 for adjustment m2
=Z Prec. *0.965/1.247
1981 31 31 218 235 31.0 223.8
1980 30 26 248 261 30.0 253.8
1979 24 21 272 282 18.4 272.2
1978 20 17 292 299 15.3 287.5
1977 25 21 317 320 19.2 306.7
1976 30 25 347 345 23.0 329.7
1975 35 27 382 372 26.8 356.5
1974 39 31 421 403 29.9 386.4
1973 37 29 458 432 28.4 414.8
1972 35 28 493 460 26.8 441.6
Double-mass Curve for Station Z
49
600
Cumulative annual precipitation, Station Z (mm)
400
y = 0.9659x - 6.5427
300
200
100
0
0 100 200 300 400 500
10- stations average cumulative annual precipitation (mm)
Adjiusted Curve
50
500
Cumulative annual precipitation, Station Z (mm)
450
y = 0.9594x - 0.226
400 R² = 0.9997
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0 100 200 300 400 500
10- stations average cumulative annual precipitation (mm)
Adjusted Linear (Adjusted)