Professional Documents
Culture Documents
96Hrs Acute Toxicity Testing of A Leak Detector
96Hrs Acute Toxicity Testing of A Leak Detector
96Hrs Acute Toxicity Testing of A Leak Detector
Prepared for
By
FEBRUARY, 2021
Page
Executive Summary.................................................................................................................................3
List of Tables...........................................................................................................................................4
List of Plates............................................................................................................................................5
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms…...................................................................................................6
List of Preparers.......................................................................................................................................7
Acknowledgment.....................................................................................................................................8
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................9
1.1 Background
1.2 Aim and Objectives
1.3 Standards and Compliance
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 MATERIALS AND METHOD................................................................................................13
2.1 Description and Acclimatization of organisms
2.2 Collection and Transportation
2.3 Equipment and Materials
2.4 Physicochemical Analysis of LD/TT/2021/002 and Test Habitat
2.5 Methodology for the 96hour Acute Toxicity Bioassay
2.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 RESULTS.................................................................................................................................18 15
3.1 Physicochemical Analysis
3.2 Range Finding Test
3.3 Bioassay Result of LD/TT/2021/002
3.4 LC50 Values and Toxicity Factor
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 DISCUSSIONS.........................................................................................................................22 18
4.1 Acute Toxicity of LD/TT/2021/002
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 CONCLUSION.........................................................................................................................23 19
5.1 Recommendation
References
Appendices
Standards and compliance not in the report (omitted)
Page numbers should be given, References and Appendices are not part of Chapter Five
The test chemical, LD/TT/2021/002 is a pinkish powder with a density of 10mg/L. It has an
unpleasant odour. The pH is 6.96, salinity 3.84 ppt, conductivity 7740 µScm-1, COD
253mg/L, BOD 2.85mg/L, Alkalinity 18.75mg/L and Total Dissolved Solid 54.50mg/L.
Furthermore, the Toxicity Factor for P. africanus was 2.3 while that of O. niloticus was 0.5.
These values show the toxicity of LD/TT/2021/002 with reference to KCL, indicating that
the reference chemical KCL is more toxic than the test chemical LD/TT/2021/002 (TF>1)
for brackish water media and less toxic than the test chemical LD/TT/2021/002 (TF<1) for
fresh water media. The result also indicated that O. niloticus was less sensitive to the test
chemical than P. africanus. This may be attributed to the physiochemical constituents of the
receiving environment, difference in the behaviour and morphology of the organisms and
their metabolic activities.
The Leak Detector Dye, LD/TT/2021/002 is hence recommended as safe for use in the
Nigerian environment at Maximum Allowable Toxicant Concentration (MATC) of
20.15mg/L for P. africanus and 16.99mg/L for O. niloticus.
Table Page
Plates Page
BOD5
You have Hour written as Hr, Hrs in some other parts of the report (not only h)
We are grateful to the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR) for recognizing and
approving our laboratory for the purpose of carrying out Aquatic Toxicity Bioassay of
chemicals to be used in the Oil industry in Nigeria. We are particularly grateful and
thankful for the confidence the following staff of the Department have for our ability.
a. Mr O.S Bajomo
b. Mr A.N Kamba
c. Mr. Illo Mohammed
d. Mr. Shehu
e. Mr. Idris Ahmed
We acknowledge with gratitude Dr. Yakubu of NIOMR for supplying our laboratory with
sufficient healthy frys of Oreochromis niloticus from their Research Center (hatchery) and
Mr. O. Matthew and his team for painstakingly collecting the juveniles of the shrimp
Palaemonetes africanus from mangrove creeks in the Lagos Lagoon at Ikorodu area.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
There are numerous chemicals used in oil and gas production. Leak Detector is a tracer dye
specially developed for detecting leaks from closed-loop system that are used in petroleum
production and/or transportation. The dye is formulated in a manner that enables rapid and
effective detection with an optimal dosage.
In ecotoxicology, toxicity tests are great tools used in deriving environmental quality
standards, and it’s used to predict the toxicity of chemicals upon which, regulatory agencies
make decision on chemicals usage in the environment.
The toxicity of many chemicals is unknown even when they can be detected. Different
chemicals combined together may have unknown additive or synergistic effects even when the
toxicity of each individual chemical is well-known (Randall M., 1999; Ogbonna and
Amajuoyi, 2009). Bioassay is the use of living organism to determine the presence, amount,
changes and effects of pollutants on life forms in the environment (Don-Pedro, 2009). The
combination of bioassay techniques as well as the analysis of the physico-chemical parameters
of the chemical and test habitat gives better inferences.
The aim of this study is to determine the toxicity of the Leak Detector (LD/TT/2021/002) when
used both in the freshwater and brackish water environments in Nigeria. The objectives
include:
i. To determine the 96hr LC50 for the toxicant/chemical used against the freshwater and
brackish water organisms.
ii. To evaluate the toxicity factors for freshwater and brackish water organisms.
iii. To recommend the chemical for use in the Nigerian environment.
The test chemical is a Leak Detector, LD/TT/2021/002 and this was obtained from the DPR,
Lagos office, 7, Kofo Abayomi Street, Victoria Island, Lagos while the recommended
reference chemical is Potassium Chloride (KCL). This was prepared under strict QA/QC in our
Laboratory.
3. 4.
Plate 1 showing the bioassay set for LD/TT/2021/002 using P. africanus and O. niloticus as test organisms.
Plate 2 showing well aerated stock tanks for maintaining the test organisms. Plate 3 and 4 shows the
determination of the average length of both and O. niloticus and P. africanus using a ruler.
These plate images are no longer being used. Please see submitted report for new plate
images
The physio-chemical parameters of the Leak Detector and test habitat were analyzed according
to internationally acceptable methods such as APHA and ASTM as recommended by DPR
(EGASPIN, 2018). These parameters include colour, odour, pH, temperature, electrical
conductivity, salinity, alkalinity, total dissolved solids, total suspended solids, chemical and
biological oxygen demand.
The acute toxicity bioassay method followed in this study is the semi-static renewal test
procedure. The 96-hour bioassay began with a range finding test to determine the least
concentration that gave no effect as well as the concentration that gave 100% mortality. The
various concentrations examined for both P. africanus and O. niloticus ranged between
50mg/L and 900mg/L using the test and reference chemicals. Having determined a suitable
range of the concentrations, the 96-hr LC50 bioassay was setup with the following in Tables 1-
2.
Table 2: Test concentration Reference Chemical (KCL) used for 96-hour LC50 Bioassay
a. Density = Mass
Volume
Mortality in the bioassay was recorded at intervals of 24, 48, 72 and 96hours. The results
obtained were analyzed to determine the LC50 values for fresh and brackish water organisms.
These values were obtained using the statistical application, SPSS 20. In addition, the toxicity
factors were determined and in accordance with the GESAMP toxicity rating/classification
(Table 4), the chemical was classified.
Etina Environmental Services Limited understands that there are chances of introducing errors
at every stage of data processing and handling; hence the research team ensured that error in
data handling during data entry and retrieval were always rectified. To reduce such errors,
direct electronic recording and data transfer processes were used. In cases where data are
handled or manually transcribed, they were normally checked against the original records.
Another common problem is loss of data due to accidental erasure of computer files. To avoid
data loss, back up files were created for every set of data and were regularly updated.
3.0 RESULTS
The physico-chemical analysis of the fresh water, Lagos lagoon water and the test chemical,
LD/TT/2021/002 yielded the result below (Table 4).
Initial range finding tests were conducted to establish suitable concentration range of toxicants
to be administered to the test organisms in the definitive tests. Six concentrations including
control were chosen for range finding. Test was run for 48 hours using 10 organisms per test
concentration.
The results of the 96-hour acute toxicity bioassay conducted on the Leak Detector,
LD/TT/2021/002 and the reference compound, KCL are presented in Tables 8-11 below
Tables below is 7-11
After Table 4, next table should have been labeled 5 and onwards
There is no Table 12
CHAPTER FOUR
From the result, the 96hLC50 of the LD/TT/2021/002 on exposure to the shrimp was
201.5mg/L while it was 169.9mg/L for fish. On the other hand, the 96h LC 50 of the reference
chemical; KCL when tested against the P. africanus and O. niloticus were 86.92mg/L and
341.74mg/L respectively. According to the GESAMP (2002) toxicity rating, the chemical
alone is practically non-toxic (LC50 100 - ≤ 1000mg/l) to both the brackish water shrimps
and fresh water fish.
The Toxicity Factors (TF) were obtained based on LC50 of the test chemical,
LD/TT/2021/002 and reference chemical, KCL on exposure to Palaemonetes africanus and
Oreochromis niloticus. The TF of Palaemonetes africanus was found to be 2.3 while that of
Oreochromis niloticus was 0.5. The values of the toxicity factors showed the toxicity of the
LD/TT/2021/002 with reference to KCL. Hence, LD/TT/2021/002 was found to be less toxic
than the reference chemical (KCL) in brackish water (TF˃1) and more toxic than the
reference chemical (KCL) in freshwater (TF<1).
Furthermore, the result indicated that P. africanus was less sensitive to the test chemical,
LD/TT/2021/002 than O. niloticus. This may be attributed to the physiochemical
constituents of the receiving environment, differential behavior and morphology of
organisms and their metabolic activities.
CHAPTER FIVE
The physicochemical constituents of the chemical and test habitat played a major role in
determining the mortality rate of the aquatic organisms. P. africanus was less sensitive to the
LD/TT/2021/002 compared to O. niloticus. The bioassay revealed that both organisms
responded in dose and time dependent manners, in such a way that the higher the
concentration of the chemical, LD/TT/2021/002, the higher the % mortality recorded and as
well the longer the duration of exposure, the higher the % mortality.
This work will make for a better understanding of the concept of basic methods of chemical
toxicity testing and as well validate the age long theory that “the most important factor that
determines the effect of any substance is the dose – time relationship. Furthermore,
combination of chemicals will interact to exhibit antagonistic, additive or synergistic effects
leading to increase or decrease in their toxicity.
5.1 Recommendation
The LD/TT/2021/002 was practically non-toxic to both the brackish water organism and
freshwater organism (100-≤1000mg/L) (GESAMP, 2002). The application factor advised for
the use of industrial chemicals and pesticides is between 0.01- 0.1mg/L.
Hence, we recommend the Chemical; LD/TT/2021/002 as safe for use in the Nigerian
environment based on the LC50 values at a Maximum Allowable Toxicant Concentration of
20.15mg/L and 16.99mg/L respectively for P. africanus and O. niloticus. At these
concentrations, strict compliance should be mandated as well as periodic in situ bio-
monitoring studies to identify possible impact on the environment due to its use.
In a sentence without figures, its more appropriate to write percentage in words, rather than its symbol (%)
American Public Health Association (1998). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water
and Wastewater 20th Edition Edited by Andrew D. Greenberg et al.
Department of Petroleum Resources (2002). Environmental Guidelines & Standards for the
Petroleum Industry in Nigeria, pp 281-291
Finney, D. J. (1978). Statistical Methods in Biological Assay 3rd Edition. Charles Griffin,
London.
Franklin, F. L. (1973). Assessing the Toxicity of Industrial Wastes, with Particular Reference
to Variations in Sensitivity of Test Animals / Fish. Rep MAFF Direct Fish Res., Lowerstoft.
Ogbonna, F. Joel; Amajuoyi, Chinomso A. (2009). Synergistic Effect of Test Chemical with
Crude oil Contaminated Aquatic Habitat, J.NES, 2009, Volume 5 Number three, Nigeria.
Randall M. (1999). Whole Toxicity Testing and Limits, Department of Ecology, Water Quality
Program, Sate of Washington, pp 173-205 WAC.
A. Density Calculation
Density of LD/TT/2021/002
Volume of density bottle = 100ml
Mass of Chemical = 1g
Density = 2g ÷ 100ml = 0.01g/ml = 10mg/L
B. Toxicity Factor
Toxicity Factor for P. africanus
The 96h LC50 of KCL against P. africanus = 86.92mg/L
The 96h LC50 of LD/TT/2021/002 against P. africanus = 201.45mg/L.
96 h . LC 50 LD /TT /2021/002
Toxicity Factor, TF = 96 h . LC 50 of KCL
201.45
¿
86.92
= 2.3
1. LD/TT/2021/002 on P. africanus
Confidence Limits
Probability 95% Confidence Limits for Concentration 95% Confidence Limits for log(Concentration)a
Estimate Lower Bound Upper Bound Estimate Lower Bound Upper Bound
Confidence Limits
Probability 95% Confidence Limits for Concentration 95% Confidence Limits for log(Concentration)a
Estimate Lower Bound Upper Bound Estimate Lower Bound Upper Bound
Confidence Limits
95% Confidence Limits for VAR00003 95% Confidence Limits for log(VAR00003)a
Probabil
ity Estimate Lower Bound Upper Bound Estimate Lower Bound Upper Bound
Confidence Limits
95% Confidence Limits for VAR00003 95% Confidence Limits for log(VAR00003)a
Probability Estimate Lower Bound Upper Bound Estimate Lower Bound Upper Bound
On arrangements, you had P. africanus, then O. niloticus for confidence limits and
probits for the test chemical. For the reference chemical (KCl), you now had O. niloticus
before P. africanus. Let your arrangements be consistent. Either P. africanus always
comes first or vice versa.