TITLE 1.

ANALYSIS OF CONNECTING FACTORS TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN DOMESTIC

FORUMS: THE CASE STUDY OF TANZANIA.

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

The use of connecting factors as the main ground of jurisdiction under private international law
has brought many challenges and difficulties under different domestic forums especially on the
deciding and enforcing foreign judgment on which is not enough to look connecting factors as
the means where by a person can obtain justice while each country has its own system of laws
and those laws are different, now how can a person who his residence is in Tanzania and his
case has been decided in French domestic court and want such judgment to be enforced in
Tanzania, does such a person can enforce such judgment While the legal system of each
countries are different? It also bring difficulties when the dispute involve people from more
than three different countries because the matter of international jurisdiction is regulated by
private international law on which there is a danger that the respective domestic conflict rules
will not be coordinated with one another and therefore the courts in several countries will
consider themselves competent for the same proceeding when regarding the concept of
connecting factors.

OBJECTIVES OF STUDY

General Objective

To assess the applicability of connecting factors on recognition and enforcement of foreign

judgment to the domestic courts

Specific Objectives

 To determine the procedures that are take place when one want to enforce foreign
judgment
 To examine the advantages of connecting factors in the domestic forums when the
dispute arise
  To find the link between connecting factor as the ground of jurisdiction and other
ground of jurisdiction that are used in domestic laws

TITLE 2.

CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON LEGAL PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERING PRESS FREEDOM IN TANZANIA -

MAINLAND

When it comes to press freedom, it cannot entirely be said that there is no press freedom but
one of the problems facing the subject matter is the fact that the laws concerning the Freedom
of press. One of the setbacks of full practice of freedom of press is the confusion found in our
Constitution of the united republic of Tanzania which does not clearly provide on the freedom
of press or access despite the presence of Article 18 which talks about freedom of expression,
there is no provision what so ever which specially (GOVERN) grants the press freedom of
obtaining every information in the society.

Emphasizing the importance of media freedom according to Article 18 of the Constitution of the
United Republic of Tanzania which state that, "every person has a freedom of opinion and
expression of his ideas". The general understanding is media as an industry and journalists as
media professionals should be free to carry out their activities subject to the professional code
of conduct. Any limitation seeking to limit the two is a threat and a direct attack to freedom of
expression.

There are numerous media outlets in Tanzania as a whole, including dozens of daily and weekly
newspapers. The government controls two daily newspapers, and the two main political parties
own one each. According to the TCRA, there are 124 licensed radio stations and 33 licensed
television stations, but only a small percentage of the population has access to television due to
high costs. Private individuals and nongovernmental organizations are the main media owners,
but control is concentrated in the hands of a few proprietors. The government reportedly
continues to withhold advertising from critical newspapers and websites, especially those that
favor the opposition.
Somehow this has never been the case in Tanzania that the media will never be free from the
clutches of the government that the more people affected to this are the journalists. The laws
imposed on the media are strict and makes it practically impossible for journalists to do their
job. Freedom of expression in Tanzania it appears, comes at a great expense, journalists are not
really free to write the truth.

The government has put restrictive laws, which prohibit the media from accessing any
documents. According to the Media Services Act of 2016 PART VII provide for offences and
penalties to the journalists.

The problem is that there are some Sections in the Act which seem to hinder a right to freedom
of expression. For instance, Section 327 defines media as "radio, television, newspaper, and
includes online platforms." Social media is defined as online interactions among people in
which they create, share, and exchange information, freedom and ideas in virtual communities,
networks and their associated platform. The inclusion of online platforms and social media in
the law further restrict access to information, freedom of expression and of the media.

TITLE 3.

EFFECTIVENESS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT INSTITUTIONS IN PROTECTING STREET CHILDREN'S

RIGHT IN MBEYA, TANZANIA.

TITLE 3.

CHALLENGES FACING BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT LEADERS IN COMBATING VIOLATION OF

CHILDREN'S RIGHTS IN MBEYA, TANZANIA

TITLE 4.

EFFECTIVENESS OF STRATEGIES USED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT LEADERS IN COMBATING

VIOLATION OF CHILDREN'S RIGHT IN MBEYA, TANZANIA