Socio-Economic, Cultural Progress and Informatics Summary

Table:
Question General Information Still need to know
Last week, you analysed Informatics applies Further clarification is
the difference between technological knowledge needed on the boundaries
Informatics and Computer to specific domains, while and interrelationships
Science? Informatics and Computer Science focuses among computer science,
Information Sciences? on algorithm creation and informatics, and
What do you add to the technical components of information science due
known facts based on this computing systems. to the rapid evolution of
week's readings? What is Information Sciences technology and its
still unclear and needs cover more aspects of societal impact.
further clarification? both computer science
and informatics,
emphasizing how people
interact with information.
The precise division
between the disciplines
and their scopes is still
unclear, particularly in
emerging sectors like AI,
data science, and
cybersecurity.
How does the article by Bresnahan et al. (2001) Further understanding is
Bresnahan and colleagues highlight the importance needed on how
(2001) and that by of considering informatics principles are
Greenhalgh et al. (2020) technological and socio- practically implemented
explain informatics in the cultural factors in in healthcare and the
context of practice? implementing informatics specific challenges faced
in healthcare. Greenhalgh in implementing new
et al. (2020) emphasize technologies.
the influence of health
information infrastructure
on technological
innovation in the context
of practice.
How can socio-economic Socio-economic processes More information is
and cultural processes can hinder informatics required on how specific
stifle informatics? through resistance to socio-economic and
change, limited resources, cultural processes hinder
digital divides, privacy informatics and potential
concerns, and cultural strategies to address these
attitudes. Cultural factors challenges (Kraut et al.,
and lack of cultural 2010).
sensitivity in informatics
solution design can
impede adoption and
integration.
References:

Bresnahan, T. (2001). “Old Economy” inputs for “New Economy” outcomes: Cluster
formation in the new silicon valleys. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 835–
860. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.835

Chen, B., Zhang, L., Guo, G., & Qiu, X. (2015). KD-ACP: A software framework for social
computing in emergency management. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015,
1–27. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/915429

Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Shaw, S., Papoutsi, C., Vijayaraghavan, S., & Stones, R. (2019).
Infrastructure revisited: An ethnographic case study of how health information
infrastructure shapes and constrains technological innovation. Journal of medical
Internet research, 21(12), e16093. https://doi.org/10.2196/16093

Wang, Y. (2011). Towards the synergy of cognitive informatics, neural informatics, brain
informatics, and cognitive computing. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics
and Natural Intelligence, 5(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.4018/jcini.2011010105

Kraut, R. E., Maher, M. L., Olson, J. M., Malone, T. W., Pirolli, P., & Thomas, J. P. (2010).
Scientific foundations: A case for technology- mediated social- participation heory.
IEEE Computer, 43(11), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2010.324

Paccoud, I., Baumann, M., Bihan, E. L., Pétré, B., Breinbauer, M., Böhme, P., Chauvel,
L., & Leist, A. (2021). Socioeconomic and behavioural factors associated with
access to and use of personal health records. BMC Medical Informatics and
Decision Making, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01383-9