| Deped-Division of OF. Mindoro | RECORDS OFFICE RELEASED i ate Released:_ G/L Department of Educatioft oxereenes — hf F MIMAROPA REGION SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF ORIENTAL MINDORO=d No: We -w3- 77 Office of the Schools Division Superintendent DIVISI |ORANDUM, No. + 8. 2023 EVALUATION OF SCHOOL HEADS’ OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF) AND THE RECALIBRATED SCORING GUIDE FOR PERFORMANCE CYCLE 2022-2023 June 13, 2023 To : Assistant Schools Division Superintendent Chief Education Supervisor, CID OIC- Chief Education Supervisor, SGOD Education Program Supervisors Public Schools District Supervisors School Heads, Public Elementary and Secondary Schools All Others Concerned 1. In compliance with DepEd Order No. 02, s. 2015 Re: Guidelines on the Establishment and Implementation of the Results-Based Performance Management System RPMS in the Department of Education, which stipulates the guidelines in ensuring organizational effectiveness and tracks individual improvement and efficiency, this Office calls for the submission of School Heads’ Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRR) for performance cycle 2022-2023 with an attached summary of teachers’ recent IPCR ratings on or before July 24, 2023. 2. A recalibrated scoring guide was contextualized and formulated by the Division Performance Committee and can be downloaded using this link: https:/ /drive.google.com/ drive /folders/1BAIYsNQ722tazaASVx6M- S8wwFZV-d9r3?usp=sharing. 3. School Heads are instructed to prepare the identified Means of Verification (MoVs) as indicated in the recalibrated scoring guide and present them to the validation team as factual bases for performance targets and measures. 4. The validation and evaluation of OPCRFs shall be handled by the Division Performance Management Team (DPMT) attached as “Enclosure 1.” 5. To ensure completeness of documents, acceptability of the MoVs, and accuracy of merit given to an accomplishment or performance cited in the OPCRFs, a District evaluation activity shall be done to be facilitated by the DPMT with the locally organized District Performance Management Teams in their respective districts. Sta, Isabel, Calapan City, Oriental Mindoro, 5200 Telephone No.: (043) 2887810 / Email Address: oriental.mindoro@deped.gov.phRepublic of the Philippines Department of Education MIMAROPA REGION SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF ORIENTAL MINDORO Office of the Schools Division Superintendent 6. Please be guided by the timeline of activities on the submission and validations of the OPCRFs. Date Activities Persons Involved Deadline of the All PSDSs . submission of the All School Heads duly 24, 2023 OPCRFS to the District | (Elementary and | Offices Secondary) Division-Level Validation | Division Performance | July 25-28, 2023 of the OPCRFs Management Team Sub- Committees | Submission of Consolidated and Evaluated OPCRFs with Certification of Public Schools District submission and Supervisors validation of the OPCRF template per District to the SDO J August 1-2, 2023 7, Each School Head shall submit only one (1) original copy of the OPCRF for signature. 8. Food and travel expenses relative to the conduct of the said activities shall be charged to Division or School MOOE subject to usual accounting and auditing rules and regulations. 9. Attached to this Memorandum are the list of members of the Division Performance Management Team, the hard copy of the recalibrated OPCRF, the Certification of submission, validation of the OPCRF template, and the recalibrated score sheet template. 10. Immediate dissemination of and compliance with this Memorandum are desired MARIA LUISA/BY (ANDO, PhD, Schools Division Superintendent Sta, Isabel, Calapan City, Oriental Mindoro, 5200 d Telephone No.: (043) 2887810 / Email Address: oriental: mindoro@deped.gov.phwy Republic of the Philippines Department of Education MIMAROPA REGION SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF ORIENTAL MINDORO Office of the Schools Division Superintendent Enclosure to Division Memorandum No. s. 2023 DIVISION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TEAM SUB-COMMITTEES PUERTO GALERA [ae SAN TEODORO Validators Designation Validators Designation 1. Nelia M. Castillo | PSDS/Sub- il. Nelia M. Castillo | PSDS/Sub- Committee Committee Chairperson Chairperson 2. Mary Rose Dilay | Division 2. Clemente C. EPS-CID | Coordinator Politico 8. Tiezi Jambalos EPS-II ._Liezl Jambalos EPS. 4. Mildred L. Cabuhal ; 4. Mirafe I. Aparato 5._ Marizel V. Axalan ‘5. Wilma Q. Clanza (6. Margie Gaya (6. Victorino Agelion 7. Loida P. Villas (7. David Beron | (8. Rowena L. Ascan 8. Agnes A. Ribon | 9. Hilda Candava | 9. Carol Beron 10. Ray Paras Secretariat_| 10. Anabelle Bae Secretariat BACO NAUJAN SOUTH [ Validators Designation Validators Designation 1. Cleofe Padrones | PSDS/Sub- 1. Alfonso Encisa | PSDS/Sub- Committee Committee Chairperson Chairperson 2. Clemente C. EPS-CID 2, Magdalena B. EPS-CID | Politico Morales | 3. Eleanor Nieva ‘SEPS 3._ Eleanor Nieva SEPS 4. Julie Aceveda, | 4. Lorna Berguera_| | 5, Jecelyn Castillo | [5 Ma. Mizel Labog | 6. Mari Barcial . 6. Lanie Gerner | (7. Erlinda Zulueta 4 7._ Emily De Silva 8. Myra Malaluan 8. Arsenio Tupaz 9. Sarlen Castillo 9. Melbeth Mendoza 10.Danicka Acedera | Secretariat 10. Charize Secretariat Constantino sod-eod Sta. Isabel, Calapan City, Oriental Mindoro, 5200 Telephone No.: (043) 2887810 / Email Address: oriental, mindoro@deped.gov.dh dqRepublic of the Philippines Bepartment of Education MIMAROPA REGION SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF ORIENTAL MINDORO Office of the Schools Division Superintendent NAUJAN WEST NAUJAN EAST ‘Validators Designation Validators Designation | 1. James Zamora PSDS/Sub- I. James Zamora | PSDS/Sub- Committee Committee | Chairperson Chairperson. 2, Eddy Dalisay EPS-SGOD 2, Bddy Dalisay EPS-SGOD 3. Elmar T. Alzate EPS-CID 3. Ma. Magdalena D. | EPS-CID 4, Febelyn Balbuena Lo - 5. Maileen Evangelista eee Caroll Mackinura’ 6. Donnalyn Herrera 5._ Grecilda Sarabia_ [7 Rommuel Romasanta | 6._Romar Magsino [8. Josie Panagsagan 7. Lorelyn Mendoza (9. Marcial Acha 8. Edralyn Delos Reyes 10. Victor Gardoce 9-aiMichael Alcala’ - TI. Sheryl Grace Tolentino | Secretariat 10. Oscar J. Paras, Jr. | Secretariat VICTORIA SOCORRO Validators _| Designation Validators _| Designation 1. Jocelyn De Castro | PSDS/Sub- T. Ammafe Jarabe | PSDS/Sub- Committee Committee Chairperson Chairperson 2. BlmarT.Alzate | EPS-CID 2. Elmer P. EPS-CID (3. Emelyn Grace Carit_ | EPS-II Concepcion [4 Babylyn Pomarejos 3._Jonaline Closa__| SEPS |S. Ma. Theresa Dimayuga 4. Aleli Arellano 6. Marcos Dilan 5._ Beatriz Alvarez 7. Roberto Orbeta 6. Nancy Almendras 8. Edgar Villarba 7._ Roger Abante 9. Ma. Ciaralyn Valencia 8._ Roberto Caper | I 9. ._Cristeta Lambon 10. Maricel Bautista | Secretariat 0. Minalyn Cabral | Secretariat Sta, Isabel, Calapan City, Oriental Mindoro, 5200 Telephone No.:(043) 2887810 / Email Address: oriental mindoro@deped.cov.nh VOffice of the Schools Division Superintendent Republic of the Philippines Department of Education MIMAROPA REGION SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF ORIENTAL MINDORO POLA [ PINAMALAYAN EAST Validators Designation Validators Designatio | 1. Lucena Manalo PSDS/Sub- oe Committee 1. Ammafe Jarabe | PSDS/Sub- Chairperson Committee [2 Dimer P. EPS-CID Chairperson Concepcion 2. Clarita G. EPS-CID | 3. Jonaline M. Closa_| SEPS Villaruel { 4. Cynthia Roldan a 3. Rock Amiel Arzobal | SEPS 5. Fernan Ricafranca emeLacial0zon (6. Rex Ramirez 5. Florife Lianto"_ | —_| 7. Lorife Novenario rea Eel Hamasticg 8. Lezebel Gonzales Z-ElisabethiCajefe 9. Loreto Labrador Sma nish avier; 10. Haizelle Grace | Secretariat 9._ Irene Magtibay - Vargas 10. Junel Cortez —_| Secretariat GLORIA PINAMALAYAN WEST Validators Designation Validators Designation 1. Lucena Manalo PSDS/Sub- 1. Genalin M. Alinio | PSDS/Sub- Committee Committee | Chairperson Chairperson _| 2. Thervel M. Saez | EPS-CID 2. Clarita G. Villaruel_[ EPS-CID 3, Joyce Mortel EPS-I 3. Rock Amiel Arzobal |SEPS_ 4. Jhon J. Malacas 4, Tailanie Mediana 5. Dulce M. Gurro 5. Ronilo Sapungan 6. Nerissa 5. Bugarin 6. Amold Cupiado 7. Gloria H. Agoncilio (7. Emma Rance 8. Ruperto H. Agoncillo 8. Nonato Magtibay j 9. Robert F. Malvar 9. Marvin Layron 10.Maria Ana Romero | Secretariat | 10.Jaymuel Ondoy Secretariat Sta, Isabel, Calapan City, Oriental Mindoro, $200 Telephone No.: (043) 2887810 / Email Address: oriental mindoro@deped.gov.oh ieSg Republic of the Philippines Bepartment of Education MIMAROPA REGION SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF ORIENTAL MINDORO Office of the Schools Division Superintendent BANSUD BONGABONG NORTH ‘Validators Designation ‘Validators Designation 1. Genalin Alinio PSDS/Sub- T. Patricio Anthony PSDS/Sub- Committee Committee | Chairperson. Chairperson. 2. Thervel M. Saez __| EPS-CID 2. Dindo M. Generato | EPS-CID (3. Christian Voltaire SEPS 3. Christian Voltaire SEPS Metin Metin 4. Marieta M. Rogel 4, Linda Mageamit 3. Osualdo F. Paz 5. Mercy Lualhati 6. Gregorio Amparo 6. Armando Sol 7. Victor R. Mandigma 7. Reynaldo Montana 8. Aubrey Beredo 8. Edwin De Guzman 9. Imelda Chongco 9. Melomar Retanal 10. Katherine Kay | Secretariat 10.Gazel Gena Secretariat Castillo rs BONGABONG SOUTH ROXAS | Validators Designation ‘Validators Designation 1, Carla Reyes PSDS/Sub- 1. Patricio Anthony PSDS/Sub- | Committee Committee | Chairperson Chairperson. 2. Dindo M. Generato | EPS-CID 2. Oscar C. Linga EPS-CID 3. Michael Angelo PDO-T 3. Francoise Marie PDO-T Adalia Gubatan 4. Cynthia Trivino 4. Minerva Castro 5. Melanie Ibabao 5. Pilipinas Ramos (6. Kenneth Gabay | 6. Haylee Fabelion 7. Silvinio Gabia 7. Jessie Rada | 8. Eunice Miranda _| 8. Winona Sanque 9. Remedios Nagan 9. Ricky Apostol 10.Meiah Eder ‘Secretariat 10.Nazareal Antaran | Secretariat Sta. Isabel, Calapan City, Oriental Mindoro, 5200 Telephone No. (43) 2687810 /EmallAddress:orienslmindoro@depad.sovshRepublic of the Philippines Department of Education MIMAROPA REGION SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF ORIENTAL MINDORO Office of the Schools Division Superintendent ‘MANSALAY BULALACAO a Validators Designation Validators Designation 1. Melanie Rafieses | PSDS/Sub- | 1. John Fajilagutan | PSDS/Sub- Committee Committee | Chairperson Chairperson 2. Roberto A. EPS-CID 2. Roberto A. EPS-CID Almedilla II Almedilla IL 3. John Carlo Malicsi_| PDO-Ii 3. Jaeger Jeff Rafa | PO-Iit 4. Jerry Varona 4. Engr. Apolinario Division Gerald Culla | Dimaculangan Engineer 6. Eugenia Fababaer 5. Myra Pajotal 7. Benjie Buenconsejo | 6. Emiliano Rey | 8. Germelin Casao 7. Lacy Ferranco _ 5 8. Agnes Taladtad 1 9. Francisco Faner _| 11.Julie Ann Panaligan_| Secretariat | 10.Janice Largado | Secretariat _| ‘Telephone No.; (083) 2887810 / Email Address: oriental.mindoro@deped.gov.ph Sta. Isabel, Calapan City, Oriental Mindoro, 5200 ¥Republic of the Philippines Department of Education MIMAROPA REGION ‘SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF ORIENTAL MINDORO Office of the Schools Division Superintendent CERTIFICATION This is to certify that . (name of School Head/HT/TIC) , (designation) of (school), had successfully submitted his/her Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF) for performance cycle 2022-2023 supported by acceptable Means of Verifications (MoVs) These MoVs were certified to be true, correct, valid, and compliant with the required MoVs indicated in the revised scoring guide in assessing the School Head’s performance for 2022-2023. Given this day of. 2023 at Certified by: Chairperson (PSDS) Attested by: Co-Chairperson (CID) Co-Chairperson (SGOD) Member ‘Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member St. Isabel, Calapan Cty, Oriental Mindoro, $200 Telephone No. (043) 2887810 / Email Address: orientalmindoro@deped.gov.nhEnclosure to Division Memorandum No. __s. 2023 ‘Republic ofthe Dilippines Department of Education MIMAROPA REGION DIVISION OF ORIENTAL MINDORO [Name of Employes [Name of Rater [Ratae! G. Manato, PRO Position T z Position [Assistant Schools Division Superintendent [SchoobDistrict Date of Review - Rating Period [Sy 2022-2023, rs ass] ete cn fears AREA a Coan) fis la Accounted for leaning outcomes as evident in 4% lgain inal applicable [assessments vied vis goals ana targets nour quarters nstructonat Leadership ess) g 3 3 RECALIBRATED SCORING GUIDE ereren [4 Average of 2% gain in all applicable |4 - Submited accpetable MOV in [assessments 3 quarters [3- Average of 2% gain in all appicabie|3 - Submited acceptable MOVs in assessments 2 quarters [2 Average of 1% gain in all applicable |2- Submited acceptable MOVS in [assessments quarter 11-No.gain in any assessment taken |1 -No acceptable evidence was [submited Pereer) Ua eu et 5 - Results ofthe assessments were submitted 1 week ater the lend ofthe quarter [Gains intne schools pertormance inthe folowing jassessments: = Periodic Exam (MPS) 4 Results of the assessments | Other standardized tests lwere submitted 2 weeks after the end ofthe quarter 3 Results ofthe assessments |were submited 3 weeks after the end ofthe quarter 2 - Results ofthe assessments were submitted 4 weeks after Ihe end ofthe quarter 1 - Results ofthe assessmentsBASIC EDUCATION SERVICES. I» Pefomed Insnetona lspevion to o1- 10% of teachers to sctiove leaning Jntcomes evident by le supervisory pans lana reports on |dessoom observation the ere Schoot ear per quarter ana were given relevant Hteedback 4 - 81.90% of teachers were observed lper quarter and were given relevant feedback. 12 ~71-80% of teachers were observed [Per quarter and were given feedback [2 -61.70% of teachers were observed 10% [per quarter and were given relevant feedback. 11-60% of teachers were observed |per quarter and were given relevant teedback. [5 87-100% of teachers wore observed [5 - Submited instructional [5- MOVs were presented and [Supervsory plan and report lsupervsion reports supported with|certiied by PSDS within one l¢ Movs per quarter |week of instructional supervision [Classroom observation too! lth instructional prescription 4 - Submited instructional 4- MOVs were presented to andfand notes [supervision reports supported win |certtied by PDS within two. [3 Movs per quarter |weeks of instructional |Pre-conference and Post- [supervision lconference meeting }3 - Submited instructional proceedings. |supervsion reports supported with|3 - MOVs were presented to and l2 Movs per quarter Jertited by PSDS within three |Annetations on instructional weeks of instructional [supervision practices [2- Submited instructional supervision [supervision reports supported with JRentection Journal on H MOVs per quarter [2- MOVs were presented to and [instructional supervision lcertied by PSDS within four [practices }1- No acceptable evidence was _|weeks of instructional submitted supervision 11 MOVs were presented to and [certted by PSDS within ve weeks of instructional [supervisionBASIC EDUCATION SERVICES I~ Alite 5 equremeris were satciod win — [5 -Gubmited indtuctonal |peces of evidence leadership reports supported with l4 Movs per quarter |. Cotectes, analyzed and tized data token] Pera nan needed erventione [4 Submitted instructional = Lcaizeleortetalaed SLM scoring |; Locate leadership reports supported with ~Localaedortetusized assessment tots [2 MOVS per quarter [S- MOVe were submited T | Schoornitated |week ater the end of the quarter |iocaized/eontextualized Istme 4 - Movs were submited 2 Jweeks afterthe end ofthe class programs, Weekly lquarer Learning Home pian, ADM, exible Leaming options aaron senso eee nn eee ees TT [soaracmemien (res nec yearns aebdawtooun: eee Spe eerer ee [cco eeee eens reenngatnben ne canaee eiromticeceiara, [seemtirears nee ae Sees l-movsweresemneas fimiamangneeiar leas Creiianieprcnearegeteaie |2-sutmites mtuions [rene aureiemets Jen ued aol on pence Spc eater |Z Semmes namatoal |rk oe ee rs [icinisecmercpa easiest asceaeerary “i Patareantone, 1 - MOVs were submitted 5 |Collected, analyzed and ees programs, an ee 1 -No acceptable evidence was |weeks afterthe end ofthe futized data to identify and recep ictteegammtemeemianinin [nee sa Semenenatenes Frere pe 7 fie pieces of evidence: ro. asthe cee ere es = FTO oer ears A S-RGTTT iy SSS CORES Sasa FS fant tAveresneausan [gowns Rectory extras 3 ct ay acti ene -srsom creertnesteacer win csc! oes adie te achnemetetipin>— [oewoom senate ot erm ate suerte 2oray aceptane [ei Mar revosear ane, Sri ints noe aena! ee sca ooneel s-71.40 crete wate wan ona fmsteriomrere’ | | gy lecstrtawarcomtevard "|e. suemtaaotany sccsate [catenin lreconrnce aren. ee eases crest a Sree ee eens ace eordp ener erties tose wan |1-Noscatitieecrnawne |z-conaues ied fcatortaweressccasnen [tne aka on Arlt nnd eres Seemaneace 1 - 1.60% of identities teachers with need for TA were coached and mentored | - No acceptable evidence was [submited=. Provded sate an dient learning land school leweonment for trough te ating peo 5% [5 Alithe 5 requrements were met |-Adhered to chid-riendly standards land programs. = Insttutionaized child protection Imechanisms and processes (ger DO [40, s. 2012) ~ Provided ICT facitieshvorkshop rooms a learning suppor system = Implemented clear DRM mobilization plan = Adopted and Implemented OK sa JDepec programs [4-4 of 5 requirements were met with levicence [2-9 ofS requirements were met win evidence 12-201 5 requirements were met vith evidence 1-4 of S requirements were met with levidence [S- Submitted Sof he acceptable Move: [3 - Submited 2 of the acceptable Move 1 - submitted 1 ofthe acceptable Movs. [5 Provided safe and chia endly environment in 4 lquarters 4 - Provided sate and child |iendly environment in 3 jauarters [a Provided sate and chiki tiendty environment in 2 lavarers 2 - Provided safe and chile }nenaly environment in 1 quarter 1 - No acceptable evidence was submited [Approved Project Proposals and accomplishment reports lon activties concerning: |- Chita Protection ier - OK sa Doped (SBFP-For elementary schools, National [Drug Education Program, [Tobacco conto, Barkada Ikontra Droga, ARH, Medical, Dental, anc Nursing |Servces, Mental Heath, and Psychosoolal Support Services) and Certificate of lconduct of One Health Week|[BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES la. Learning Ematronment lass) b Had achieves tne Iighest sarin Wash In Schoo (wins) rogram Rating wthin erating peroa 5% [B= Had complied al of the requirements necessaty for the lachievement of WinS 3-star rating cettiied by SGOD-SHNS. [4 Had complies all of the requirements necessary forthe lachievement of WinS 2-star rating lcertined by SGOD-SHNS. [s - Had complied all of the requirements necessary for the achievement of Wins ‘star rating lcertited by SGOD-SHNS [2- Had prepared 50% of the requirements for 1 sta: Wins rating cetiied by SGOD-SHNS. } - Had jut obtained zero star on Wins practice [5-Had Waianed the Star rating! nad increased in terms of Wins star rating Jo- Had not increased in terms of Wins star rating [5 ~All MOS were presented at [Uploaded Wins Assessment the time of validation certified by |Too! |SGOD-SHNS [Certitcate of 3-star Wins |4- All Movs were presented one| Award Imonth after the validation cettiied by SGOD-SHNS 3 - All MOVs were presented 2 months after tne validation certited by SGOD-SHNS I2- Al Movs were presented 2 months ate the validation lcetied by SGOD.SHNS. = All MOVs were presneted 4 months ater the validation certited by SGOD-SHNS [> Hac inated anc lcncucted acthites on [SORRM cur the ring period oa |B Althe 3 requirements were met |- Conducted schoo: based hve/earthquakersunam) and other related hazard dis = Crafted one SDRRM plan Installed one veiied and approved RADAR App [s-2 requirements were met wth levidence 11-1 requirement was met with levidence 5 Submited 3 of te acceptable Move [3 - Submitted 2 of the acceptable Move 1 - Submited 1 of te acceptable Movs: 5 Provided safe and chi: | Guarieriy Accomplehment tiendly environment in 4 Iteports on school-based quarters ie/eartnquake/tsunami and other related hazard cits [4 Provided safe and child- friendly envionment in 3 [signed SORRM plan [quarters Proof one verified and 13 - Provided safe and chid- approved RADAR App Iinendly environment in 2 lauarters }2- Provided safe and child. rienay envionment in quarter 1 - No acceptable evidence was lsubmited[BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES: 1s. Human [Resource [Management and [Development js) la Concucte at east lone SPPOased INSET and3 or more ISLACe within the rating] period win he fotowing requirements Complete INSET [documents [compete suac [soaumens [SLAC Terminal Report INSET Tecminat Repon| * [5 Alte 4 requirements were met with evidence 14-901 4 requirements were met with evidence 3-2 of 4 requirements were met with levidence 12-1 04 requirements were met with levidence |1- No INSET and SLAC Conducted [5 Submitted 4 ofthe aoseplable Movs 4 - Submited 3 of the acceptable Movs {3 - submitted 2 ofthe acceptable Movs l2- Submited + of the acceptable Movs 1 - No acceptable evidence was lsubmites [5 Conducted INSET or SLAGS [Complete INSET doouments Jon the prescribed time (Complete SLAC documents 4 - Conducted INSET of SLACS 1 day after the preserved time [SLAC Terminal Report {3 Conducted INSET or SLACS INSET Terminal Report |2days after the prescribed time [2 Conducted INSET or SLACS. [3 days after the prescribed time 1 - Conducted INSET or SLACS 4 days ater the prescribed time lb. Provided tectricl assistance to 01-100%| ofteachers en matters | Jpcaining othe lemancement of lassroom Imanagement sits ea newuctena, competence and to er teaching personnel ltorcupportsortcee |wtnn he RPNES Cyto, [5-97-1009 ofboth teaching and non teaching personne! were provided technical assistance on thir identiies [development needs |4- 81-90% of both teaching and non leaching personnel were provided technical assistance on thei identified development needs Is - 71-80% of both teaching and non- teaching personnel were provides technical assistance on ther identified [development needs [2 - 61-70% of bath teaching and non- teaching personnel were provided with technical assistance on their ientiied JGevelopment needs 1 - 1.60% of both teaching and non- leaching personnel were provided technical assistance on thel identified development needs [5 Submitted 4 of the aeseplabie Movs J¢- Submitted 3 of the acceptable Move '3- submited 2 of the acceptable Movs [2 Submited 1 of the acceptable Move } = No acceptable evidence was submited [s- Provided technical assistance [Coaching Form/Repor on in 4 quarters (classroom management skis, instuctional [4 - Provided technical assistance [competence and support in 3 quarters services for non-teaching Personnel) [3 - Provided technical assistance! lin 2 quarters RettectionJoural of the teacher mentored 12 Provided technical assistance! int quarter Narrative report as evidence or improved ciassroom 1 -No acceptable evidence was |management skis |submites Narrative report as evidence or improved intructional competence. [Class program and samples of inspected Lesson Plans‘BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES. [5- Developed standards and [5 Submitied 4 of the accepiable [5 - MOVs were submitied 1] Projecubudget proposal on imlemerted school awards ns ove week ate the end of te quater [reward and recognition for focogniion quater ctsandingeacners and J-surmited sorte acepiavle | -wovewere submited? |eamers + Deveoped stance ana nove ks ater the ond ofthe plementes schoo wards and lavaner Pokey guideinenertera tor fecooniton atleast vee times per |2- Submited 2 ofthe acceptable senea avarss and Ie. Devoe year hove [2-movs were submites3_|recognono outstanding pectectaleh |weeks after the end of the Jaccomplishment of pupils ingen 3 Developed stancads and 2-submites + ofthe aceptavie evar and teachers fecogrten caves x] | 25% hipiemersed schoo awards and (wove asst ocho jecoonton at ast tw times per year 2-movs were submites 4 oceuertaton report on pet perteemance |1 - No acceptable evidence was | weeks afer the end of the Jawards and recognition at eee) |2 - Developed standards and [submitted jquarter [school level plemented schoo anaras and Teccgnian atieaet once 2 yer 1 - Move were suite § rocks aersne endothe 1 No schol awards andar © Java recognition was implemented [5- Ald requirements were met wih |5- Submited 4 ofthe acceptable 5 - Provided opporunties for Summary af Waiings pieces of evidence Move lorofessional growth of teachers. attended by teachers |within the RPMS Cycle |-100% of teachers were sent to _/4- Submited 3 of he acceptable |Summary of teachers trainings Move O-No opportunities were undergoing Graduate = 50% of teachers pursued graduate of| provided for teachers within the. [Studies post graduate degree courses [3 - Submtted 2 of the acceptable [RPMS Cycle 30% of teachers were Move Repot of promoted promotedieciassitid from tree years leacherstreciassitied position Jago up to present [2- Submitted 1 of the acceptable 4. Proves opportnty = 10% of teachers were grantes | MOV IRepor of scholarship grants lo seek personal and scholarship within the rating period obtained by teachers lrtessonal growin or] | 2.5 1 - No acceptatie evidence was. feecherewitin te 4-301 4 requirements were met with [submited RPMS Cycle pieces of evidence [3-201 4 requirements were met with pieces of evidence 2-1 of 4 requirements were met with Pieces of evidence None of the requirements were met[B= Aone requvenenta werent wih [5 Extablahed @ partnerships [5 Strengthened eohoal and [Lstof ganization 1 -Liquidated and submited schoo! land financial report 3 weeks or more ater the deadine + -Liquidated and submitted financial report 4 weeks after lseadiine Peco of onde supported wih acertabie MOVs Jeommuniy parrersupin |Conemmeer an lavartors [socumenaton of meetings | estates tron cio (cha |e sta i be oe Knee inn i onus (Ce |NGAs etc) co ~ participated by the school, "e ity ship in 3 IProject Pr Is so) pe |ommunty pater in lec Proposal Peco «erence cae |S: Eesdonelz peremtaa lenis aes agen ease aes leoncuted miiseantane HOvs PTA Reson 2 fener 2- strengthened schoo! ana 8 = Orwenizes programs wih siskehckrs [2 Established 1 partnership community partnership in 2 [Documentation of Reports z Jrsmeay epee erscaseicandctr [avppoted wit acceplbie MOVE. |quaree H |arorens lo eoabionas farpowee ach pt ccueraay Accomplishment Reports 3 |nvotement and sot amy ond seempictret repr cny SMOAcrary|1 No partnerships were 2- strengthened soho! and |commanity {comment te sunaing secures. lstabiened communty parmersnpin'! —_|Copy MONMOU e ny § [Pemete etry aon Cetin souce the shtrosh eee asd laste Blow Soon Yer 1 -No acceptable evdence was |DPOS transmittal of reporte| ° [4- 30f 4 requirements were met with pieces of [submitted linventory of generated 3 Ietoee| resources (000. 004) [s-2214reqirenera ret wth pes of tence 2-1 remanent er met wth pce of rides Non tne sirens wa nt 5 Usa ad sibied schoo — [5 Submited 4 ofthe costae [5~Umudated an submited — pa land thane report week beterethe. [Move nancial eports on time leading Inspection Report Js Submited3 ofthe acceptable [4 Liquidated and submited 4 4 Ligidete and submited scoot rove franca repor tweek ater [Acceptance § lane nancial report on he deadine deadine 2 Peon 3 Submited 2 ofthe acceptable lcors B |e.scnoor —— [ainiadand s- Liguicsted and suomited schoo! ove 5 Liguidated and submited 3 |tsodertipana [SMe shots and tnancal repr 1 week aftr he Iinandal reper 2 weeks ater Downloading and igusaton & [Management er eae ma [deadline 12- Sumitted + of the acceptable [deadline leports certified by 3 [operations Brocapolcs and ove bookkeepers or agcountant 8 latenee 2-Ligicated ane submited shoot 2- iuidted and submited 3 jaow Fa ecement) and inane report 2weeksaterthe |1 No acceptable evidence was |tnancalrosot Sweets fr 3 [deadline Jsubmitted |deadiine|p Pertermed 4 schoo! leaderehip and |management and loperatonsfinctons [5 Afrequzemens were met wth places of [5 - Submiled 4 of the acceplable| evidence Move —Maitaned updated schoots LIS-BEIS _|4 submited 3 ofthe acceptable Printized physical facies improvement [ove land maintenance inthe AIP and ensures sua standards for faces gvento the | . submited 2 of the acceptable [school as planned on re SIP ana BELCP finaye, ~ Organized implemented dear seuctues [ana work arrangements tat promote Ishared leadership ana goverance and [ete roles and responstates of schol 12 - Submited + ofthe acceptable Movs pe <= - No acceptable ence was raed tetra ginarce mca Ne aoe ee scot munecone wees, |4-3of4requeements were met wih pieces ot evidence [2-204 requroments ware met wt piace} or esidence l2-1 ot 4roqueements were met wth pieces lot evidence 1 -None ofthe requirements were met [S= Performed school leadership [Summary Watix oF land management and operatione|Personnel's Work functions on time Distribution of roles and [4 Performed school leadership |responsibiliies of personnel fand management and operations| backed up with special unctions 1 week ate orders, [2 - Performed schoo! leadership | Grievance Committee land management and operations|records and reports on functions 2 weeks late resolved contits [2-Performed schoo! leadership [Approved SIP & BE-LCP. land management and operations tunctions 3 weeks late [Screenshots of Lis.8EIS ldashboars | - Performed schoo! leadership land management and operations functions 4 weeks lateBASIC EDUCATION SERVICES Jc Conducted at east lone School Hoad- lahoreden-aunored baseracion S00 lanproved esearch elated any echo! lencerns win the sting pees 3% [5- Implemented atthe school level and funded by BERF (RO) | - Implemented at the schoo! level and presented to and approved at the division level 2 -Cratted @ research proposal Presented to the District Research [Commitee 2 - Crafted a research proposal resented to the School Research ICommitee }1= No acton /ul-biown research at al, 5- Presented completed [5 Submitted manuscrptof [Cerificate of Recognition on basiciaction research in the _|completeaiproposed basicfaction|tne presentation ofthe [Regional level research earlier than the lbasiraction research lscactine |4- Presented completed |Certitate of completion of basiclaction researchin the _|4~Submitted manuscript of {the basicfaction research vision! evel |completediproposed batsiofacton research on time JAccomplchment report of [3 -Presentes completed lhe implementation ofthe lbasicfaction research in the Distict|3- Submitted manuscript of | PPAS es output ofthe level |completec/proposed basiclaction |research certified by PSOS esearch 1 week ater the 2 - Presented basiciation ldeadtine research Propoeal in the Division level 2 - Submitted manuseript of completed/proposed basiclaction| 1 Presented basiclaction research 2 weeks ater the research Proposalin the Distict |deadine level } - Submitted manuscript of completed/proposed basic/action| research 3 weeks ater the ldeadtine ls Had achieved he gnest SBM Love of Practice forthe last. Ihe yours % [5~ Had complied althe requremens necessary for the achievement of SBM Level 3 of practice [4 - Had complied al the requitements Inecessary for the achievement of SBM Level 2 of practic, 3 - Had complied all the requirements Inecessaty forthe achievement of SEM Level 1 of practice 2 - Had prepared 50% of the requirements for SBM Level tof Practice } - Had just obtained SEM Level 0 of practice. [5 Had increased in terms of SB |5~ Al MOVs were presented at |Cerificale of SAM Levels Level of practice wthin 3 years [the time of validation, [8 3 of practice |o- Had not increases in terms of |4 - All MOVs were presented one] SBM selt- assessment |SEM Level of practice (1) month after validation Jcheckist for SBM Levels 0 & } of practice certified by 3 - All Movs were presented two| PSOSand District SBM (2) months after validation. [Validation Team 12 All MOVs were presented three (2) months ater validation 1 All MOVs were presented Hour (4) months ater validationPs Factor [ror BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES Pyaar -otuctesmotents pot use othe Jeu ds a Is Senea ae lpeaeonautn any [ari worstop iri enturene (ne sri nator ed win rng pre lcexnatoen nn ne [ing pare ret [-swdrotonn) sere, net Hos, sss od are [rar vse vo, Jeon rato oe iti {ering ped. astray asics ste aon. regen lary ter cures [asia tha KAA) Icnuctes ding ne ata ped 10% [Cerificate of Recognition as speaker District Memo as coordinate |School, School head. teachers or Students’ recogniton/awards in various| lcompetions |Acknowedgement letter, |Copy of cover page [Supporting documents ‘sgodhpteaaz073 RAFAEL G. MANALO, PhO. “iistart Schools Dison Supermendont Rater [Accomplishment verbal Description ‘Approving Authority MARIA LUISA D. SERVANDO, PhO, CESO VI ‘Schace Din Soper