Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Midyear Review Form MRF For Sharing
Midyear Review Form MRF For Sharing
SY 2022-2023
Step 4: Monitor teacher performance and coach them using the Performance Monitoring and C
Mid-year Review Form (MRF).
Developed by:
CHRISTINE ANNE M. PREPUSE
Master Teacher I, Dasmariñas West NHS
City Schools Division of Dasmariñas
christineanne.prepuse@deped.gov.ph
RM (MRF)
th ratees.
Mid-year Review/Rating
Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater
Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge of August 2022 - 7% Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet/s
Education Knowledge and content within and across July 2023 or inter-observer agreement form/s done through
Services Pedagogy curriculum teaching areas. onsite/face-to-face//in- person classroom
( 21%) (PPST 1.1.2) observation. Quality
Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed classroom 7% Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet/s
Education Environment structure to engage learners, or inter-observer agreement form/s done through
Services and Diversity of individually or in groups, in onsite/face-to-face//in- person classroom
Learners meanigful exploration, observation. Quality
(21%) discovery and hands-on
activity within a range of If onsite/face-to-face/in-person classes are not
physical learning implemented,
environments. 1. through observation of synchronous /
(PPST 2.3.2) asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or Efficiency
2. through observation of a demonstration
teaching* via LAC session.
Timeliness
5. Managed learner behavior 7% Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet/s
constructively by applying or inter-observer agreement form/s done through
positive and non-violent onsite/face-to-face//in- person classroom
discipline to ensure observation. Quality
learning- focused
environments. If onsite/face-to-face/in-person classes are not
(PPST 2.6.2) implemented,
1. through observation of synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or
2. through observation of a demonstration Efficiency
teaching* via LAC session.
Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, managed and 7% Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet/s
Education and Planning implemented or inter-observer agreement form/s done through
Services (21%) developmentally sequenced onsite/face-to-face//in- person classroom
teaching and learning observation. Quality
processes to meet
curriculum requirements If onsite/face-to-face/in-person classes are not
and varied teaching implemented,
contexts. 1. through observation of synchronous /
(PPST 4.1.2) asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or
Efficiency
2. through observation of a demonstration
teaching* via LAC session.
Timeliness
Timeliness
Timeliness
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, selected, 7% Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet/s
Education and Reporting organized and used or inter-observer agreement form/s done through
Services (21%) diagnostic, formative and onsite/face-to-face//in- person classroom
summative assessment observation. Quality
strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements. If onsite/face-to-face/in-person classes are not
(PPST 5.1.2) implemented,
1. through observation of synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or Efficiency
2. through observation of a demonstration
teaching* via LAC session.
Timeliness
Basic 5. Personal 13. Applied a personal 7% A reflection/journal entry that highlights the
Education Growth and philosophy of teaching that application of learner-centered teaching philosophy Quality
Services Professional is learner centered in the lesson plan or community work.
Development (PPST 7.1.2)
(14%)
Efficiency
Timeliness
Development
(14%)
Timeliness
Basic Plus Factor 15. Performed various 2% Any one (1) proof of:
Education related works/activities that committee involvement;
Services contribute to the teaching- involvement as module/learning material
learning process. writer/validator Quality
involvement as a resource speaker/learning
facilitator in the RO/SDO/school-initiated TV/radio-
based instruction;
book or journal authorship/co-authorship/
contributorship ;
advisorship/coordinatorship/chairpersonship
participation in demonstration teaching; Efficiency
participation as research presenter in a
forum/conference;
mentoring of pre-service / in-service teachers
conducted research within the rating period;
Others (Please specify)
With annotations on how it contributed to the
teaching-learning process.
Timeliness
0 0 JOSEFINO P. REYES
RATEE RATER APPROVING AUTHORITY
MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) FOR HIGHLY PROFICIENT TEACHERS
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period SY 2022 - 2023
Mid-year Review/Rating
Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater
Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Modeled effective 7% Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheets
Education Knowledge and applications of content done through onsite/face-to-face//in- person
Services Pedagogy knowledge within and classroom observation.
Quality
( 21%) across curriculum teaching
areas. If onsite/face-to-face/in-person classes are not
(PPST 1.1.3) implemented,
1. through observation of synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or
2. through observation of a demonstration
teaching* via LAC session. Efficiency
Timeliness
Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Worked with colleagues to 7% Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheets
Education Environment model and share effective done through onsite/face-to-face//in- person
Services and Diversity of techniques in the classroom observation.
Quality
Learners management of classroom
(21%) structure to engage learners, If onsite/face-to-face/in-person classes are not
individually or in groups, in implemented,
meaningful exploration, 1. through observation of synchronous /
discovery and hands-on asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or
activities within a range of 3. through observation of a demonstration
physical learning teaching* via LAC session. Efficiency
environments.
(PPST 2.3.3) and proof of attendance of colleague/s
Timeliness
Timeliness
Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Developed and applied 7% Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheets
Education and Planning effective strategies in the done through onsite/face-to-face//in- person
Services (21%) planning and management classroom observation.
Quality
of developmentally
sequenced teaching and If onsite/face-to-face/in-person classes are not
learning processes to meet implemented,
curriculum requirements 1. through observation of synchronous /
and varied teaching asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or
contexts. 3. through observation of a demonstration
(PPST 4.1.3) teaching* via LAC session. Efficiency
Timeliness
Timeliness
9. Advised and guided 7% 1. Proof/s of attendance in coaching and
colleagues in the selection, mentoring sessions/meetings/LAC sessions/ FGDs
organization, development, / other collegial discussions that highlight the
and use of appropriate objective.
teaching and learning
resources, including ICT, to 2. Minutes/Notes of coaching and mentoring Quality
address specific learning sessions/meetings/ FGDs / other collegial
goals. (PPST 4.5.3) discussions that highlights the objective.
Timeliness
Basic Plus Factor 15. Performed various 2% Any proof that the master teacher:
Education related works/activities that served as facilitator / speaker
Services contribute to the teaching- served as demonstration teacher
learning process. served as a member of the technical working
group Quality
served as OIC in the absence of the principal
represented the principal in meetings and
conferences
observed classes of Teachers I-III
assisted the school selection committee in the
evaluation of credentials when hiring or promoting
teachers
served in a committee
served as adviser of co-curricluar activities Efficiency
served as a coordinator / chairperson
authored / contributed to a book or journal
coached and mentored learners in
competitions
mentored pre-service / in-service teachers
conducted research within the rating period;
Others (Please specify)
With annotations on how it contributed to the
teaching-learning process. Timeliness
0 0 JOSEFINO P. REYES
RATEE RATER APPROVING AUTHORITY