Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2022 1 24 40694 Order 03-Jan-2023

    Uploaded by

    Satish Singh
    7 views1 page
    This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case from January 3, 2023. The petitioner, Ravindra Prasad S.A., filed a special leave petition against the National Highways Authority and others, challenging a Bombay High Court order. The Supreme Court, in a hearing before the Chief Justice and Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, dismissed the special leave petition and said it was not inclined to entertain the case under Article 136 of the Constitution. Any pending applications related to the case were also disposed of.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    35637_2022_1_24_40694_Order_03-Jan-2023

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case from January 3, 2023. The petitioner, Ravindra Prasad S.A., filed a special leave petition against the National Highways Authority and others, challenging a Bombay High Court order. The Supreme Court, in a hearing before the Chief Justice and Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, dismissed the special leave petition and said it was not inclined to entertain the case under Article 136 of the Constitution. Any pending applications related to the case were also disposed of.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    7 views1 page

    2022 1 24 40694 Order 03-Jan-2023

    Uploaded by

    Satish Singh
    This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case from January 3, 2023. The petitioner, Ravindra Prasad S.A., filed a special leave petition against the National Highways Authority and others, challenging a Bombay High Court order. The Supreme Court, in a hearing before the Chief Justice and Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, dismissed the special leave petition and said it was not inclined to entertain the case under Article 136 of the Constitution. Any pending applications related to the case were also disposed of.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.

    1 SECTION IX

    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

    Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 21334/2022

    (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-10-2022


    in ARBP No. 79/2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at
    Bombay)

    RAVINDRA PRASAD S.A. Petitioner(s)

    VERSUS

    NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY & ORS. Respondent(s)

    ( IA No.180301/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED


    JUDGMENT )

    Date : 03-01-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

    CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE


    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA

    For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, AOR

    For Respondent(s)

    UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following


    O R D E R

    1 We are not inclined to entertain the Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of

    the Constitution.

    2 The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed.

    3 Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

    Signature Not Verified

    (GULSHAN KUMAR ARORA)


    Digitally signed by
    GULSHAN KUMAR
    (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)
    ARORA
    AR-CUM-PS
    Date: 2023.01.03
    17:18:08 IST
    ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
    Reason:

    You might also like