Professional Documents
Culture Documents
G11fe Toc TZ1
G11fe Toc TZ1
G11fe Toc TZ1
G11FE
FORMATION EVALUATION
Duration: 3 hours
INSTRUCTIONS
2. Attempt ALL Questions. The allocation of marks for each question is shown in
brackets below the question in the right hand margin. Where a question has
multiple sections, allocation of marks for each section is shown in square
brackets within the question.
3. All diagrams and charts are included with their questions. State clearly any
assumptions used and intermediate calculations made in numerical questions.
No marks can be given for an incorrect answer if the method of calculation is not
presented.
4. If possible, please type your answers. Make sure to include images of any
sketches created as part of the answer, or annotated diagrams used to answer
the questions, insert your figures in your answer file.
Question 1
a) Explain the depth of the invasion in a low permeability and a high permeability
formation; give your reasoning for each case.
(4 marks)
b) A drilled borehole is logged using a tool string comprising various tools. The
Caliper tool is often used as part of the tool string. Briefly describe the principle
operation of the Caliper tool. Explain why it is necessary to measure the Caliper
log and how measurements will be used in the interpretation process.
(4 marks)
Question 2
a) In general, porosities tend to change with depth of the sediments. How would
you describe the porosity depth trend? What are the major parameters
controlling porosity changes with depth. Discuss the porosity depth trends in
sandstone, shale and carbonate rocks.
(7 marks)
b) Explain why sometimes the maximum temperature in the borehole is less than
the actual formation temperature? What is your recommendation to determine a
stabilised down hole formation temperature measurement?
(3 marks)
Question 3
b) Briefly explain the invasion process during the drilling of the well. Discuss the
parameters (at least 4 parameters) influencing the extent or depth of the flushed
and transition zones.
(4 marks)
Question 4
Describe (at least three qualitative techniques) how you would distinguish between
potentially high permeable zones and low permeable zones in the downhole log
section. In your answers, give details of which relevant logs you would use and why?
(6 marks)
Page 2 of 14
Heriot-Watt University G11FE_DECEMBER_2022-2023_HWOL_TZ1_TOC_3hrs
Question 5
Question 6
a) Describe index of oil movability and explain how you would determine invasion
and movable hydrocarbon.
(5 marks)
b) Describe Rwa to Rw comparison procedure with detailed steps for water saturation
estimation.
(5 marks)
Question 7
You have a suite of logs comprising, CAL (in inches), GR (Gamma ray, gAPI), DT
(Sonic μsec/ft), RHOB (Bulk Density, g/cc), NPHI (Neutron Porosity, m3/m3), LLS
(Laterolog Shallow resistivity, ohm.m), LLD (Laterolog Deep resistivity, ohm.m), LLM
(Laterolog Medium resistivity, ohm.m) measured in depth (MD in meters). The bit-
size is 8.4 inches and the mud is salty water-based.
a) Zone the downhole log section by drawing horizontal lines on the section
(Well_A_Logs) at appropriate points. Discuss your reasoning for your zonation.
Identify depth of severe and moderate washed out (overgauged) zones and mark
them on the log section, give your reasoning choosing these zones.
(4 marks)
b) Give a summary table in your answer book indicating the approximate depths of
each zone, with the likely lithology and permeable zones, explaining your
reasoning.
(8 marks)
Page 3 of 14
Heriot-Watt University G11FE_DECEMBER_2022-2023_HWOL_TZ1_TOC_3hrs
d) Identify possible water zone and mark the contact on the Well_A_Logs, give
your reasoning.
(2 marks)
Question 8
a) Determine the porosity at depth (950m) using the Wyllie Time-Average equation
and the Empirical curves for your chosen lithology using Chart Por-3. Assume
the matrix acoustic velocity is 14100 ft/sec, and that the fluid acoustic is 5,300
ft/sec. compare the results and suggest reasons for any possible differences.
State the lithology you have assumed for this depth. (Note that in Chart Por-3 the
curved lines labelled Field Observation are the values from the Empirical curves).
(4 marks)
b) If the same formation as that in the question above has the matrix and fluid
densities of 2.61 g/cm3 and 1.10 g/cm3 respectively, calculate the porosity using
the density equation. Compare the result with that given by the acoustic methods,
and suggest reasons for any possible differences.
(4 marks)
c) Plot a single data point for depth 950m on an M-N plot (Chart CP-8) using the
relevant data from all three porosity logs. Assume that the transit time of the fluid
(tf) is 189 μsec/ft, the fluid density (ρf) is 1.1 g/cm3, and the neutron porosity of
the fluid (φNf) is 1. Show your methodology. State, with reasons, whether the
results are consistent with your previous choice of lithology at this depth. Discuss
what other ambiguity your M-N interpretation might have with previous
interpretation.
(6 marks)
Question 9
a) From the log Quality Control report, it has been identified that there are a few
anomalies (spikes) in the logs for example at the depth of 750m and close to
850m in Resistivity, Sonic, Neutron and Density logs. Discuss what might have
caused these anomalies explaining your reasoning.
(3 marks)
Page 4 of 14
Heriot-Watt University G11FE_DECEMBER_2022-2023_HWOL_TZ1_TOC_3hrs
b) Determine the formation factor (F) using the Humble formula, and using the
Density derived porosity calculated in question 8. If in the water leg very close to
the hydrocarbon contact, Ro is measured at 0.2 ohm.m, calculate the Rw.
(Assume that the reading from the log is corrected for borehole, invasion, and
bed thickness). Calculate the water saturation in the oil leg using Archie’s
equation. Assume n=m= 2, a=1 and Rt is 12 ohm.m.
(6 marks)
c) Find the volume of the shale in the formation at the depth of 950m based on
the following data.
∆𝑡𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑛 = 50 𝜇𝑠/𝑓𝑡
∆𝑡𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑙𝑒 = 90 𝜇𝑠/𝑓𝑡
Assume at the depth of 950 m lithology is laminated sand-shale. Using the laminated
sand-shale simplified model estimate the True resistivity by a parallel resistivity
relationship in case Rsd (the resistivity of the clean sand laminae) reads 25 ohm.m and
Rsh (the resistivity of the shale laminae) reads 2 ohm.m.
(6 marks)
END OF PAPER
Page 5 of 14
Heriot-Watt University G11FE_DECEMBER_2022-2023_HWOL_TZ1_TOC_3hrs
Page 7 of 14
Heriot-Watt University G11FE_DECEMBER_2022-2023_HWOL_TZ1_TOC_3hrs
2. SI UNIT PREFIXES
Page 8 of 14
Heriot-Watt University G11FE_DECEMBER_2022-2023_HWOL_TZ1_TOC_3hrs
APPENDICES: DIAGRAMS
Well_A_Logs
Page 9 of 14
Heriot-Watt University G11FE_DECEMBER_2022-2023_HWOL_TZ1_TOC_3hrs
Page 10 of 14
Heriot-Watt University G11FE_DECEMBER_2022-2023_HWOL_TZ1_TOC_3hrs
Page 11 of 14
Heriot-Watt University G11FE_DECEMBER_2022-2023_HWOL_TZ1_TOC_3hrs
Page 12 of 14
Heriot-Watt University G11FE_DECEMBER_2022-2023_HWOL_TZ1_TOC_3hrs
Page 13 of 14
Heriot-Watt University G11FE_DECEMBER_2022-2023_HWOL_TZ1_TOC_3hrs
Page 14 of 14