Mid Year Review Form New

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Master Teacher
Name of Employee: SYLVIA J. CAMBE Name of Rater: MILA E. MORALES

Position: Master Teacher II Position: Principal II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd Zambales Date of Review: December 10, 2021
Rating Period: August, 2021- July, 2022
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Modelled 20.0% Classroom observation tool Quality 5
Education Knowledge effective (COT) rating sheet/inter -
Services and applications of observer agreement form
Pedagogy content from
knowledge within 1. An observation of
and across synchronous teaching.
curriculum
(online teaching or two-way
teaching areas.
radio instruction)
2. If option 1 is not possible, an
observation of a recorded
video lesson or audio lesson
that is SLM-based or MELC-
aligned.
3. If options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of a
demonstration teaching via
LAC with proof of attendance
of colleague/s.
Basic 2. Evaluated with Any supplementary material Quality 5

Education colleagues the (in print/digital format) made
Services effectiveness of by the ratee and used in the
teaching lesson delivery that
strategies that highlights teaching
promote learner strategies that promote
achievement in
learner achievement in
literacy and
literacy and numeracy.
numeracy.
1. Activity sheets
. 2. One lesson from self-
Weight
per KRA
learning module (SLM)
3. Lesson Plan (e.g DLP, DLL,
WHLP, WLP, WLL, Lesson
Exemplars and the likes)
4. Video lesson
5. Audio lesson
6. Other learning materials in
print/digital format (please
specify and provide
annotations) with minutes of
focus group discussions on
(FGD) with fellow mentors
or minutes of coaching and
mentoring session with
teachers that show
evaluated teaching
strategies that promote
learner achievement in
literacy and numeracy.
Basic 3. Modelled and Classroom observation tool Quality 5

Education supported (COT) rating sheet/inter -
Services colleagues in the observer agreement form
proficient use of from
Mother Tongue, 1. An observation of
Filipino and synchronous teaching.
English to
improve teaching
radio instruction)
and learning, as
well as to develop 2. If option 1 is not possible, an
learners’ pride of observation of a recorded
their language, video lesson or audio lesson
heritage and that is SLM-based or MELC-
culture. aligned.
possible, an observation of
a demonstration teaching
via LAC with proof of
Weight
per KRA
attendance of colleagues.
Basic 4.Displayed a Classroom observation tool Quality 5

Education wide range of (COT) rating sheet/inter -
Services effective verbal observer agreement form
and non-verbal from
classroom 1. An observation of
communication synchronous teaching.
strategies to
support learner
radio instruction)
understanding,
participation, 2. If option 1 is not possible, an
engagement and observation of a recorded
achievement. video lesson or audio lesson
aligned.
Basic 3. Learning 5.Exhibited 20.0% Classroom observation tool Quality 5

Education Environment effective (COT) rating sheet/inter -
Services strategies that observer agreement form
ensure safe and from
secure learning 1. An observation of
environments to synchronous teaching.
enhance learning
through the
radio instruction)
consistent
implementation of 2. If option 1 is not possible, an
policies, observation of a recorded
guidelines and video lesson or audio lesson
procedures. that is SLM-based or MELC-
aligned.
Weight
per KRA
6.Exhibited Classroom observation tool Quality 5

effective practices (COT) rating sheet/inter -
to foster learning observer agreement form
environments that from
promote fairness, 1. An observation of
respect and care synchronous teaching.
to encourage
learning.
radio instruction)
aligned.
of colleagues.
Basic 7. Worked with Any supplementary material Quality 5

Education colleagues to (in print/ digital format) made
Services share successful by the rate and used in the
strategies that lesson delivery that
sustain supportive highlights maintaining
learning learning environments that
environments that
nurture and inspire learners
nurture and
to participate, cooperate and
inspire learners to
participate, collaborate in continued
cooperate and learning.
collaborate in 1. Activity sheets
continued 2. One lesson from a self
learning. learning module (SLM)
3. Lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL,
Weight
per KRA
WHLP, WLP, WLL lesson
exemplars, and the likes)
4. Video lesson
5. Audio lesson
print/ digital format (please
specify and provide
annotations)
7. With minutes of focus group
discussion (FGO) with fellow
mentors or minutes of
coaching and mentoring
session with teachers that
show sharing of strategies
for increased learner
participation, cooperation
and collaboration
8. Modelled Any supplementary material Quality 5

successful (in print/ digital format)
strategies and made by the rate and used
support in the lesson delivery that
colleagues in highlights maintaining
promoting learning environments that
learning
nurture and inspire learners
environments that
to participate, cooperate and
effectively
motivate learners collaborate in continued
to work learning.
productively by 1. Activity sheets
assuming 2. One lesson from a self
responsibility for learning module (SLM)
their own 3. Lesson plan (e.g., DLP,
learning. DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL
lesson exemplars, and the
likes)
4. Video lesson
5. Audio lesson
Weight
per KRA
print/ digital format (please
specify and provide
annotations)
7. With minutes of focus group
discussion (FGO) with fellow
mentors or minutes of
coaching and mentoring
session with teachers that
show sharing of strategies
for increased learner
participation, cooperation
and collaboration
8. questionnaire/answer
sheets
9. Developed performance
tasks: (a) with rubrics
reviewed by superior; (b)
with sample accomplished
rubrics
10. Others (Please specify and
3. Diversity of provide annotations)
Basic Learners, 9.Assisted 20.0% SET A Quality
Education Curriculum colleagues to Classroom Observation Tool
Services and Planning design, adapt and (COT) rating sheet or inter-
& implement observer agreement form
Assessment teaching from
and strategies that are 1. An observation of
Reporting responsive to synchronous teaching.
learners with (online teaching or two-way
disabilities, radio instruction)
giftedness and 2. If option 1 is not possible, an
talents. observation of a recorded
. video lesson or audio lesson
aligned.
Weight
per KRA
LAC with proof of
attendance or colleagues
with proof of attendance of
colleague/s
SET B
Teacher Reflection Form 5
(TRF) on assisting
colleagues in designing,
adapting, and/or
implementing teaching
strategies that are
responsive to learners with
disabilities, giftedness and
talents and a certification
from the school head that
the ratees classes have no
identified learners with
disabilities, giftedness and
or talents.
Basic 10.Developed and SET A Quality

Education applied teaching 1. Classroom Observation Tool
Services strategies to (COT) rating sheet or inter-
address observer agreement form
effectively the from
needs of learners 2. An observation of
from indigenous
synchronous teaching.
groups.
radio instruction)
aligned.
Weight
per KRA
of colleagues.
SET B
Teacher Reflection Form 5
(TRF) on developing and
applying teaching strategies
to address effectively the
needs of learners from
indigenous groups and a
certification from the school
head that the ratees classes
have no identified learners
from indigenous groups.
Basic 11.Worked -New improved design of Quality 4

Education collaboratively learning programs
Services with colleagues to -Detailed recommendations
evaluate the on the design of learning
design of learning programs
programs that -Synthesis of the evaluation
develop the
of the learning programs
knowledge and
-Own evaluation of the
skills of learners
at different ability existing learning programs.
levels.
.
12.Worked An Accomplished LAC plan Quality 5
collaboratively anchored with the school
with colleagues LAC plan to analyze and
to analyze and utilize assessment data to
utilize modify practice and/or
assessment data program to further support
to modify
learner progress and
practices and
achievement with any 1 used
programs to
further support in the implementation of the
Weight
per KRA
learner progress LAC plan.
and achievement.  Minutes of LAC session
on the analysis of
assessment data to
modify teaching
practices and programs.
 Any proof of
collaborative review of
learner assessment
data.
 Lesson plan with
accomplished part VI:
Reflection and Index of
Mastery
• Test Item
Analysis
• List of Identified
least mastered
skills based on
frequency of
errors/correct
responses
• Intervention/
remediation
/enhancement/e
nrichment plan
 Any proof of
collaborative review of
intervention materials
developed for
remediation/
enhancement
 Accomplishment report
of intervention
/remediation/enhancem
ent/enrichment activities
(e.g. remedial sessions,
Weight
per KRA
Summer Reading
Camp, Phil-IRI-based
4. Community 13.Reflected on 30.0% • Synthesis of evaluation Quality 4

Linkages and and evaluated of a program/ projects/
Professional learning activity that maintains
Engagement environments that the learning
& Personal are responsive to environment responsive
Growth and community to community contexts.
Professional contexts.
• Minutes of consultative
Development
meeting with
parents/other external
stakeholders on
programs, projects,
and/or activities that
maintain a learning
environment,
highlighting the
evauations made, with
proof of attendance.
• Minutes of focus group
discussion (FGD) with
teachers on a
programs/project
/activity that maintains a
learning environment,
highlighting the
evaluations made with
proof of attendance.
• Survey on
programs/projects/activit
ies that maintain a
learning environment.
14.Discussed with 1. Minutes of LAC Quality 5

colleagues sessions/professional
Weight
per KRA
teaching and meetings to discuss the
learning practices Code of Ethics for
that apply existing Professional Teachers
codes, laws and and the reviewed
regulations that annotated evidence of
apply to the practice of colleagues.
teaching
2. Minutes of LAC
profession, and
sessions/professional
the
responsibilities meetings to discuss the
specified in the Code of Ethics for
Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers
Professional and the reviewed
Teachers. personal reflection notes
of colleagues.
3. Minutes of LAC
sessions /professional
meetings to discuss the
Code of Ethics for
Professional Teachers
4. Activity
proposal/Learning
Action Cell (LAC) Plan
15.Exhibited • Evaluation report on the Quality 5

commitment to implementation of
and supported school
teachers in the policies/procedures or
implementation of minutes of subject
school policies area/grade level
and procedures to
meetings or professional
foster harmonious
meetings on evaluating
relationships with
learners, parents school
and other policies/procedures.
stakeholders • Minutes of subject
area/grade level
meetings or professional
Weight
per KRA
meetings on the
implementation
progress of school
policies/procedures
(provide at least 2 to
show discussions held)
• Minutes of subject
area/grade level
meeting or professional
meeting on
disseminating
information and
implementing school
policies/procedures
(provide at least 2 to
show discussions held)
• Proof of implementation
of school policies and
procedures
16.Manifested a • Sample lesson plans of Quality 5

learner-centered colleagues with
teaching annotations about
philosophy in enhancing their learner-
various aspects of centered teaching
practice and philosophy.
support
• Minutes of LAC
colleagues in
sessions about
enhancing their
own learner- enhancing teachers
centered teaching learner-centered
philosophy. teaching philosophy
through lesson planning,
• LAC plan that details
supporting teachers in
enhancing their learner-
centered teaching
Weight
per KRA
philosophy through
lesson planning.
• Lesson plan exemplar
used during a Learning
Action Cell
17.Identified and 1. Performance Coaching Quality 5

utilized personal and Mentoring Form
professional (PMCF) showing
strengths to guidance given to
uphold the dignity teachers and remarks in
of teaching as a terms of upholding the
profession to help
dignity of teaching.
build a positive
2. Documented feedback
teaching and
learning culture from superiors,
within the school. colleagues, learners,
parents/guardian or
other stakeholders
directly reflecting the
ratees good practices
that uphold the dignity of
teaching as a
profession.
3. Annotated evidence of
practice indirectly linking
to the upholding of the
dignity of teaching as a
profession
• Screenshot of
text message /
chat / email/ any
form of
communication
with parents
/guardian or
learners (name
Weight
per KRA
or identifier
removed)
• Remarks from
superior/school
head about
one’s personal
professional
qualities (e.g.,
entries in
Performance
Monitoring and
Coaching Form
or Mid-Year
Review Form)
• Recognition
from the
school/school
community
about one’s
qualities
• Others
Personal notes on one’s
personal professional
strengths.
18.Reflected on • Updated IPCRF- DP

the Philippine from Phase II
Professional • Mid- year Review Form
Standards for (MRF)
Teachers to plan • Performance Monitoring
personal and Coaching Form
professional
(PMCF)
development
• IPCRF– DP
goals and assist
colleagues in • Certification from the
planning and ICT Coordinator/ School
achieving their Head/ Focal Person in
own goals. charge of e- SAT and
Weight
per KRA
IPCRF-DP.
5. Plus Factor 19.Performed 10% Any proof of: Quality 5

various related • Served as
works/ activities facilitator/speaker
that contribute to • Served as
the teaching- demonstration teacher
learning process. • Served as a member of
the technical working
group
• Served as OIC in the
absence of the principal
• Represented the
principal in meetings
and conference
• Observed classes of
teacher I-III
• Assisted the school
selection committee in
the evaluation of
credentials when hiring
or promoting teachers
• Served in a committee
• Served as adviser to co-
curricular activities
• Served as
coordinator/chairperson
• Authored/contributed to
a book or journal
• Coached and mentored
learners in competitions
• Mentored pre-service/in-
service teachers.
• Others (please specify
and provide
annotations)
Weight
per KRA
MILA E. MORALES SYLVIA J. CAMBE ROMEO M. ALIP, PhD., CESO V
Rater Ratee Approving Authority

Mid Year Review Form New

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Mid Year Review Form New

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mid Year Review Form New

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Master Teacher

Name of Employee: SYLVIA J. CAMBE Name of Rater: MILA E. MORALES

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Basic 2. Evaluated with Any supplementary material Quality 5

Basic 3. Modelled and Classroom observation tool Quality 5

Basic 4.Displayed a Classroom observation tool Quality 5

Basic 3. Learning 5.Exhibited 20.0% Classroom observation tool Quality 5

6.Exhibited Classroom observation tool Quality 5

Basic 7. Worked with Any supplementary material Quality 5

8. Modelled Any supplementary material Quality 5

Basic 10.Developed and SET A Quality

Basic 11.Worked -New improved design of Quality 4

4. Community 13.Reflected on 30.0% • Synthesis of evaluation Quality 4

14.Discussed with 1. Minutes of LAC Quality 5

15.Exhibited • Evaluation report on the Quality 5

16.Manifested a • Sample lesson plans of Quality 5

17.Identified and 1. Performance Coaching Quality 5

18.Reflected on • Updated IPCRF- DP

5. Plus Factor 19.Performed 10% Any proof of: Quality 5

MILA E. MORALES SYLVIA J. CAMBE ROMEO M. ALIP, PhD., CESO V

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

You might also like