Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Brick Comparission - 112929

    Uploaded by

    Chirag
    The document compares different types of bricks: red clay (Aval No.), flyash bricks, and AAC blocks. It provides information on their formation process, shape and size, wastage levels, weight, usage of plaster, thermal conductivity, strength, water absorption, dry density, fire resistance, availability, durability, termite problems, sound insulation, demolishing and reuse potential, price, advantages, and disadvantages. The key differences highlighted are that red clay bricks are irregular in shape, heavier, and more water absorbent; flyash bricks are stronger, more regular in shape, and environmentally friendly; and AAC blocks are lighter, less water absorbent, and more suitable for large buildings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Brick Comparission - 112929

    Uploaded by

    Chirag
    5 views1 page
    The document compares different types of bricks: red clay (Aval No.), flyash bricks, and AAC blocks. It provides information on their formation process, shape and size, wastage levels, weight, usage of plaster, thermal conductivity, strength, water absorption, dry density, fire resistance, availability, durability, termite problems, sound insulation, demolishing and reuse potential, price, advantages, and disadvantages. The key differences highlighted are that red clay bricks are irregular in shape, heavier, and more water absorbent; flyash bricks are stronger, more regular in shape, and environmentally friendly; and AAC blocks are lighter, less water absorbent, and more suitable for large buildings.

    Original Description:

    Brick wall

    Original Title

    BRICK COMPARISSION_112929

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document compares different types of bricks: red clay (Aval No.), flyash bricks, and AAC blocks. It provides information on their formation process, shape and size, wastage levels, weight, usage of plaster, thermal conductivity, strength, water absorption, dry density, fire resistance, availability, durability, termite problems, sound insulation, demolishing and reuse potential, price, advantages, and disadvantages. The key differences highlighted are that red clay bricks are irregular in shape, heavier, and more water absorbent; flyash bricks are stronger, more regular in shape, and environmentally friendly; and AAC blocks are lighter, less water absorbent, and more suitable for large buildings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    5 views1 page

    Brick Comparission - 112929

    Uploaded by

    Chirag
    The document compares different types of bricks: red clay (Aval No.), flyash bricks, and AAC blocks. It provides information on their formation process, shape and size, wastage levels, weight, usage of plaster, thermal conductivity, strength, water absorption, dry density, fire resistance, availability, durability, termite problems, sound insulation, demolishing and reuse potential, price, advantages, and disadvantages. The key differences highlighted are that red clay bricks are irregular in shape, heavier, and more water absorbent; flyash bricks are stronger, more regular in shape, and environmentally friendly; and AAC blocks are lighter, less water absorbent, and more suitable for large buildings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    BRICK NAME

    AVAL NO. (RED FLYASH BRICK AAC BLOCKS


    CLAY)
    FORMATION MAN-MADE MACHINE MADE MACHINE MADE

    SHAPE & SIZE IRREGULAR – NOT REGULAR – PROPER REGULAR – PROPER BIG
    PROPER SIZE
    WASTAGE MINIMUM 10% LESS THAN 2% WASTAGE LESS THAN 10%
    WASTAGE
    WEIGHT ABOVE 2.5KG AROUND 2.5KG LIGHTER

    PASTER USAGE MORE USED DUE TO COMPARITIVILY LESS USED LESS


    IRREGULAR SHAPE DUE TO REGLUAR SHAPE
    THERMAL HEAT ROOM CONTROL HEAT COMPARITIVILY LESS HEAT
    CONDUCTIVITY COMPARITIVLY IN ROOM
    (ROOM TEMP. EFFECT)
    STRONGNESS STRONG (METALLIC VERY STRONG COMPARITIVILY LESS
    SOUND) STRONG
    WATER ABSORBTION 20-25% 10-16% LESS THAN 10%
    FACTOR
    DRY DENSITY 1900 KG/CUBE 1700-1800 KG/CUBE 550-650 KG/CUBE

    FIRE RESISTANT NOT VERY RESISTANT RESISTANT RESISTANT

    AVAILABILITY EASILY AVAIL. AVAILABLE NOT EASILY AVAIL. (ON


    DEMAND)
    DURABILITY LONG DURABILITY

    TERMITE PROBLEM FACED NOT FACED . NOT FACED

    SOUND INSULATOR SOUND EASILY NOT TRANSFER


    TRANSFER
    DEMONLISH AND POSSIBLE NOT POSSIBLE
    REUSE
    PRICE RS. 7000 – 7500 RS. 7000-9000 RS. 50-60 PER BLOCK
    ( RS. 7-7.5/brick) (Rs. 7-9/brick)
    ADVANTAGES TRUST STRENGTH LESS WEIGHT
    AVAILABLITY ENVI. FRIENDLY LESS WATER ABORBTION
    STRONGNESS LESS WASTAGE RATE
    REGULAR SHAPE LESS JOINTS
    GOOD ALTERNATIVE LESS COST ON MAKING
    DISADVANTAGES WASTAGE, COMPARITIVILY LARGLY USED IN MAKING
    HEAVY- INCREASE NOT EASILY AVIALABLE BIG BUIDINGS
    DEAD LOAD IN COST FACTOR VARIES LESS STRENGHT
    MAKING BUILDING, QUALITY VARIES NOT USED FOR
    LARGE NO. OF JOINTS NOT SUITABLE FOR FOUNDATION
    MAKE LARGE WATER TOPOGRAPHICAL AREA
    USAGE,
    IMPROPER SHAPE

    You might also like