PJAEE, 17(7) (2020)

MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF CAUSATIVE FACTORS OF

DEVIANT STUDENTS AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AMONG
SCHOOL STUDENTS

Dr.K.Deepika
Assistant Professor
SRM IST

Dr.K.Deepika, Multiple Regression Analysis Of Causative Factors Of Deviant Students

And Academic Achievement Among School Students– Palarch’s Journal of Archaeology
of Egypt/Egyptology 17(7) (2020). ISSN 1567-214X.

Key score : Multiple regression , Linear regression, causative factors of deviant students
and academic achievement

Abstract
Regression analysis is utilized for which factors have impact in variable. It is utilized to distinguish which
is the more viable in free factor. The significant idea of Regression is to distinguish relationship of
factors' .The Multiple Regression Analysis is utilized to discover the connection between at least one
dependent factors to subordinate variable. In Regression investigation more than one autonomous variable
and ward variable are called multilinear Regression and furthermore helps which is more impact on
subordinate variable. Here specialist used to discover which one of the causative variables is powerful on
academic performance is degenerate understudies. Analyst utilized parental, Peer, society and school
factors as free factor and academic achievement as needy variable. Sample taken 145 observation
methods is used to identify the sample in total population of 7546 at 13 schools.
INTRODUCTION
Numerous analysts have done in the causative components of sudents and tell
about the impact of academic Performance. The human exercises were impacted by
the elements that may prompt positive or negative function in their social orders.
Particularly understudies exercises are influenced by environmental factors
particularly guardians, climate, school and companion. This paper tells about the
adequacy of variables influencing academic Performance with the assistance of
model investigation of them dependent on numerous direct Regression strategies
and plans to realize the major impacting factors and to recognize the causes.

5139
 PJAEE, 17(7) (2020)

This paper looks for methods of impact of causative variables, factors a model
investigation of them dependent on different straight Regression strategies and
plans to add to the revelation of major impacting factors and the effect of academic
achievement and confidence .
Causative factor in optional schools stays a significant issue far and wide. In non-
industrial nations, be that as it may, this is an all the more stressing pattern
(Adegun, 2013; Masese, Nasongo, and Ngesu, 2012; Carra, Esterle, and Hedibel,
2009; UNODC, 2002). In spite of the fact that deviation as a wonder fluctuates
from nation to nation, deviancy factor in a school setting incorporates delinquency,
medication and liquor misuse, wantonness, skipping classes, common turmoil,
smoking, defacing, battling, late class reports and fluffiness, protection from
change. , to name simply a few(Agboola and Salawu, 2011; Njoroge, Onduso and
Thinguri, 2014). The specialists accept that the deviations should be explored as a
marvel with four causes.
MATERIALS AND METHOD
The investigator identified the thirteen schools by purposive method and identified
the sample by random sampling technique. Investigator identified the sample by
the direct and indirectly by observation method. The investigator given the
questionnaire to the respondent and asked them to fill. After the questionnaire was
filled, and it was collected back by the investigator.
SAMPLE AND SAMPLING TECHNIQUE: 180 sample were identified and this
same were used for the study. From total 7546 A samples of 145 deviant students
were selected for this study. This sample was identified by the direct and indirect
observation and sample was drawn from thirteen schools from Kanchipuram
district.
MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION THEORY FOUNDATION
The perusing capacity mirrors the all out purpose of test paper questions, the
affecting variables of deviancy can be estimated by utilizing the thought
parental factor, peer factor, school factor, society factors. To investigate the
connection between's these four impacting factors and the academic
Performance, this paper applies the various direct Regression technique,
considers the significance levels of four affecting variables and the connection
among them and gives logical approaches to recognizing factors which is the
more causes and correct the obstacles.
The hypothetical models of the different rectilinear Regression examination
are frequently ordered into two kinds, specifically, the exploration models
between free factors and along these lines the factors, and consequently the
examination models between autonomous factors and autonomous factors. To
all the more experimentally and normally apply the various direct Regression
models to contemplate the causative variables of deviancy understudies and
academic Performance, this section expounds the hypothetical models from the
accompanying two perspectives:
Data table basic parameters
Regression is that the assurance of measurable connection between at least two
factors. In straightforward Regression two factors are utilized. One variable

5140
 PJAEE, 17(7) (2020)

(free) is that the clarification for the factor of another (subordinate). When
there are very two free factors the examination concerning relationship is
perceived as different connections and along these lines the condition
portraying such relationship is named on the grounds that the numerous
relationship condition.
“Regression examination cares with the induction of a suitable numerical
articulation jumps on finding estimations of a variable on the possibility of test
variable . It is in this way intended to take a gander at the associ ation of a
variable Y to a gathering of different factors X1, X2, X3… … .Xn. the most
normally utilized condition in Y=b1 X1 + b2 X2 +… … + bn Xn + b0”
Here Y is that the variable , which is to be found. X1 , X2 ,… and Xn are the
known factors with which forecasts are to be made and b1, b2 ,… .bn are
coefficient of the factors.

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

In this examination, the dependent variable is academic Performance,

Independent factors are Parental, Peer, School and Society and investigation
are talked about as follows:
Dependent variable : Academic achievement (Y)
Independent variables : 1. Parental factors(X1)
2. Peer factors (X2)
3. School factors (X3)
4. Society factors (X4)

“Model Summary”

Adjusted_ R Std. Error of the

“R” R 2
_Square Estimate

1 0.702(a) .492 .478 12.670

a Predictors: (Constant), per tpar, pe tot, tot soc, sctot

Multiple R value : .702
R2 value : 0.492
F value : 33.926
P value : <0.001**
“Sum_of_
Squares” df Mean_Square (F) Sig.
1 Regression 21784.236 4 5446.059 33.926 .000(a)
Residual 22474.137 140 160.530

5141
 PJAEE, 17(7) (2020)

Total 44258.372 144

a Predictors: (Constant), per tpar, pe tot, tot soc, sctot

b Dependent Variable: aa

Table 4.3.11 Variables in the Multiple Regression Analysis

Un-standardized- “Standardized
Model Coefficients Coefficients” t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta B Std. Error

1 (Constant) 185.776 10.897 17.048 .000

tot school -.451 .094 -.329 -4.776 .000

pe tot -.252 .087 -.198 -2.897 .004

Soctot -.406 .129 -.224 -3.154 .002

parent tpar -.386 .111 -.237 -3.494 .001

Note: ** Denotes significant at 1% level

DISCUSSION OF THE STUDY

The numerous connection coefficient is 0.702 measures the level of connection

between the genuine qualities and the anticipated estimations of the scholarly
Performance. Since the anticipated qualities are acquired as a straight blend of
school factors (X1) , Peer (X2), the coefficient estimation of 0.702 demonstrates
that the connection between academic Performance and the four autonomous
factors is very solid and negative.

The Coefficient of Determination R-square estimates the integrity of-attack of the

assessed Sample Regression Plane (SRP) as far as the extent of the variety inside
the reliant factors clarified by the fitted example Regression condition.
Accordingly, the estimation of R square is 0.478simply implies that about 47.58%
of the variety in change is clarified by the assessed SRP that utilizes misery and
uneasiness as the free factors and R square worth is basic at I Chronicles level.

The multiple regression equation is

5142
 PJAEE, 17(7) (2020)

Y = 185.776 -0.451X1 -0.252X2 - 0.406X3 - 0.386X4

Here the coefficient is from X1 - 0.451, which is the incomplete impact of school
factors on school execution, with different factors staying steady. The assessed
negative sign suggests that this impact is negative and that the exhibition esteem
diminishes by 0.451 for each abatement in school variables and this coefficient
esteem is huge at 1%. The coefficient of X2 is 0.252 and speaks to the halfway
impact of companion factors on scholarly execution, with different factors held
consistent. The assessed negative sign infers that such an impact is negative that
the scholarly score diminishes by 0.252 for each reduction in even factors, and this
coefficient esteem is critical at 5%.

Here the coefficient of X1 is - 0.451 speaks to the part impact of school factors on
Academic Performance, holding different factors as consistent. The assessed
negative sign suggests that such impact is negative that Performance score would
diminished by 0.451 for each unit decline in school elements and this coefficient
esteem is huge at 1% level. The coefficient of X2 is 0.252represents the fractional
impact of friend factors on academic Performance, holding different factors as
steady. The assessed negative sign infers that such impact is negative that scholarly
score would diminish by 0.252for each unit decline in peer components and this
coefficient esteem is critical at 5% level. The coefficient of X3 is - 0.406represents
the fractional impact of society factors on academic Performance, holding different
factors as steady. The assessed negative sign suggests that such impact is negative
that academic score would diminish by 0.406for each unit decline in the public eye
and this coefficient esteem is hug

The coefficient of X4 is - 0.386represents the fractional impact of society factors

on academic Performance, holding different factors as consistent. The assessed
negative sign infers that such impact is negative that academic score would
diminish by.386for each unit decline in the public arena and this coefficient esteem
is huge at 5% level.

In view of normalized coefficient, school factor (- 0.451) is the main elements to

separate scholarly Performance, trailed by society, parent and last friend factor (-
.406, - .386, - .252). this might be school are participate significant function in their
life . they remain greatest time in school so their life changes happens in the school
and furthermore all the components in a roundabout way subordinate in the school
factors

5143
 PJAEE, 17(7) (2020)

20

15

Frequency

10

Mean =66.61
Std. Dev. =17.531
N =145

0
40 60 80 100
aa

This above figure explains historgram graph quantitative information. This helps to
predict the dependent variable. The same variables help in the identification were
more influence in dependent variable. the regular margins were between continuity
of data. This graph tells that an intense attention of the extrapolative variables has
an impact on student achievement. The highest bars on the graph have the greatest
impact on student achievement.

CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION

This paper first makes a poll of powerful factors of causative variables of deviancy
students and afterward an examination of test inquiries of causative elements, and
that lead to discover which elements impact deviancy more

At that point the numerical hypothesis and application scope of the multi-variable
direct Regression model are expounded, laying the hypothetical reason for
investigating the connection between academic Performance and four persuasive
components.

Next, after a distinguishing is given to 145 understudies who are deviant, test
information is gathered by the content outcome and information preparing
technique. The example information is later used to set up the multi-variable direct
Regression model of academic Performance and get principle powerful factors of
deviant student, laying the premise of investigating the improvement approaches of
student’s capacity.

5144
 PJAEE, 17(7) (2020)

Next, after an identifying is given to 145 students who are deviant, sample data is
collected according to the text result and data processing method. The sample data
is later used to establish the multi-variable linear regression model of academic
achievement and get main influential factors of deviant student, laying the basis of
exploring the improvement approaches of reading ability.

Finally, on the basis of the regression model, the paper concludes the school factors
most influence the deviancy and academic achievement of deviant students.

REFERENCES
1. Adegun, O. A. (2013). An Analysis of the Offences Committed by Youths
in Selected Remand Homes in South West Nigeria, Implication for School
Administrators Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4 (1), 375-381.

2. Adler, P. A., and Adler, P.( 2009). Constructions of Deviance: Social

Power, Context, and Interaction, 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

3. Agboola, A.A. & Salawu, R.O. (2011). Managing Deviant Behavior and
Resistance to Change, International Journal of Business and Management Vol. 6
(1), 235-242
4. Brady, P. (2006). “Working Towards a model of secondary school culture”
(Discussion Paper), Ontario, Canada: Lake head University Publication. Carra,
C., Esterle, M., & Hedibel, M. E. (2009). Violence in Schools: European
Trends in Research, International Journal on Violence and Schools, Vol.9 (1), 3-7
5. Chumbe, J., Likoko, S., Liambila, M. & Muthamia, H. (2015). Factors
Influencing Secondary School Students to Steal and Their Need for Guidance and
Counselling in Bungoma West District, Bungoma County in Kenya.
International Journal of Science and Research, Vol.4 (1), 1083-1087
6. Cohen, S., Marion, L. & Morrison K. (2011). Research Methods in Education
(7th Ed.) London, UK: Routledge Falmer. Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V.L.
(2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd Ed.),
Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Sage. Georges, S (2009). Deviant Behaviour
and Violence in Luxembourg Schools. International Journal of Violence and
School, Vol.10, 54-70.
7. Hirschi, T. (2002). Causes of Delinquency http://www.Heritage. Org:
Transaction Publishers. Accessed march2014. [8]. Humphrey, J. A &
Schmallenger, F. (2011). An Overview of Deviant Behaviour, Stockholm, Sweden:
Jones and Bartlett Learning Publishers.
8. Masese, A; Nasongo W. J. & Ngesu, L. (2012) The Extent and Panacea
for Drug Abuse and Indiscipline in Kenyan Schools. Asian Journal of Medical
Sciences, Vol.4 (1), 29-36.
9. Marshall, B.C. & Robert, F.M. (2011). Sociology of Deviant Behaviour,
Belmont, USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning Njoroge, E. W., Onduso, T.M.,
Thinguri, R. (2014). School Leadership Role In Predicting Deviant Behaviour
Among Secondary School Students In Gatanga District, Muranga County.
Researchjournali’s Journal of Education, Vol. 9, 1-15
10. ROK (2006). Kenya National Youth Policy, Nairobi, Kenya:
Government Printers Simatwa, M.W. (2012). Management of Student Discipline in

5145
 PJAEE, 17(7) (2020)

Secondary Schools in Kenya, a case study of Bungoma country. Educational

Research, Vol.3(2), 172-189. [11].
11. Torrente, G and Vazsonyi, A, T. (2012). Adolescence and Social
Deviance. Anales de Psicología, Vol.28(3), 639-642. [12]. UNESCO (2015).
Education for all 2000 - 2015: Achievements and Challenges, Paris, France:
Author.
12. UNODC (2002). School-based education for drug abuse prevention, New
York, USA: Author.
13. UNODC (2005). Crime and Development in Africa, New York, USA:
Author.

5146