Comparative Politics

82202
 1
" v n
"
p na gn
.
.
.
5. u u
.
. n.
.
u .

0 gn
.
6.

u
. in.
. .
. .

3.
7

a
(D
.
. n.
J.
.

. .
4. a .

C
.
 1
" a
v "
a
1. 4.

,
n
.

2. 5. n

z
|.
)
. .

r. .

3. 0. m
.

|I.
.

0. 7.
.

( .

J. z
10

8. “ 10.

"
D
D .
.

. J.
.
.
(state-in-
society approach)
D.
.
.
. a
. aa5
h

u
n

9. |I.

10.
10
 2

“
n
4.

n
.

D m
1. a7 Ib6 GY 6 T

.
.
5.

U.

gi
2. a
. g
.

m g
3.

16.

|,

9
. (|V SY G.
J.

.
 .
9.

ip
m unm
so iwminwita,
y lanli▇
. misamn
e we eg
.
n
u
J.

nn
.
hi
wpâ u
7. eu va
.
n. pn
.

) g
.

8. .

10.
|I.
u n m
.

R. . "
.
m yg .

. nu
.

.
 u 2
r * "

1. .

in.

. "
3.

n. n
.
.

4.

2.
in.
.

(
|I.

. m p
5.
a 8.
n m u
in.
n.

.
. 1 u ur

. 9.

p
(n
n. .
g
.
J.

0.
. 10.

g
n.
. .
.
v.
z . g
g
J.

.
m ng
r
 2

1. .
2.

3.

4.

5.

6. .

7. .

8. .

9.
10. 10.
16

maduuwangmuiwins(critical
theory)

n. munavarinialanunins (actor over

Donnyona (methodological indi-
structure)
ngreduuntilumans (formal rule)
9.

tive theory)
and (bias)
a. ionnuana (individual)
2.

hemilovuvuowsnu (American
model)

(Hybrid
model)

minster model)

model)

model)
5.

3. Structuralist

Historicist

n. muilunqwiaunas (middle-range Legalist

theory) Holistic

. Pragmatist
 17

6. "bringing institutions back in" A. aisneinuamuinuneau (logic of

appropriateness)
a. assneanumiRams (logic of com-
munication)

collective action)
9.

n. assnsdnuwauseluww (logic of
interests)

Inniw (logic of path-dependency)

7.
appropriateness)
i. amnsmnumsieens (logic of commu-

9.

collective action)

n. am:munahe lei (logic of interests)

1721w (logic of path-dependency)

8. appropriateness)
a. araneanunaaaans (logic of com-

arransomwaniss leeni (logic of interests) munication)

imiw (logic of path-dependency) collective action)

 u e v "
"m
n
1. m . y

n.

D
J. s

Z.
m
4. ä
n.

i
.
.

.
i
g
J.
u

p
.

m -
a
.

n
a
 .
i u s g B
anynna u
in. ni
n i s
T
.
R (Kenneth Arow)
a 0) a n n pn▇
ma u e p um
. m -
m m m n m 1.

ma u n
s e
. m
nju a z án m
5 | I6
Ta
m m

6.
y
(James Buchanan) i
n. Ha u â R
y um oy a
. n
n e 18.
u

. na aR ) umma l m i
â m nar g r uw
.

J
um▇ ▇ ▇

s
 25

.
(Kenneth Arrow)
n.
. a

D) wa
n u a y u
n . ne
m u 1 n

5. n n

n.
.

m m n
n
7. y
. (James Buchanan)
n. a
h u
e

m
.

mm . Ha
m u
 I 5
a " a iny
"
a g g

) m I e

i 5
n.
. î
.
( n
.
n. .

(
. 5
J. 1.
f.
a
J. -

a n . -
13.
gi
in.
.
.
J. m -
(

5
p au i rn " rmu is
p "
gn
(

V.
lu
n.
18 . ih▇ ▇
,.
J.
i
. - .
"
"

. T, ITT

.
. ng▇
.
n.
g 0.
5.

. m ( )
l I.
n
. an . an▇
.

g a J.

-
v
n .
6. m
in. )i -
1. -

. n n
9.

(development syndrome)

in.
7. .

in. N.
i
10.

. m
. . n

s-

. 1

a
n.
 10.
o
i n
u ng
o
in. m n nj v n.

1. m n nj .
s q
n ný .

ndo▇ ▇▇ ▇
. m ná ro

19.
. . 1886
G a g
. u
.
.
1
.
 6

s" g or"

1. “ "
ê a

.
9T .

. .
.

. . .
. . ( . . .

2. 5.

yam
n.
.

. .
. .
J.
. v.

. .. . . .
1717-1720 6.

(.
w
. .
.
)

.
.
36

7. m 9. 1
i . . 1886
ni . . 1886
.
. . 1886
. . . 1889
J. n . . 1889
. n 10.
ng
g

.
. l
J.

2.

3.

4.

6.

7.

8.
9.

10.
10.
38

0. i

in.
2ä
.
.
(D nî 0.

.
J.
a y

9. u

. Centrism

. Hegemony
. Dominator

Governance
Statism
7. o n u mam n in i (functionalism)
ua u지 a i N -pam u i s
n
I i uaem o v
a-w , m
. - w , m i
. i - J. m la p l or ou
J. m in ul ana ai au -w i ,
0. -m▇ ▇▇▇ 10. Ted Gurr
o on nu u in Minorities at Risk: A Global View of
i. u n lai▇ ▇ Ethnopolitical Conflict
o u ioya n
. i u ua▇ ▇ ▇ ▇ na ath
i iul r ig nan a i n.
. om▇ ▇ ▇ ▇ ,

u ua am nauou
. u m a ii▇ . e

u qu mam oy . n s
(shape) am▇ ▇
et v s ou ua
 43

1.

nuwamuniniad(Marxist insight)
q. manninmunu (collective action)

2. state)

vation)

Chalmers Johnson

3. Charles Tilly

Karl Marx

. Ted Gurr

choice)

hu/ manerinmny(collective violence)

anamiasla (grievances) Chalmers Johnson

A. Charles Tilly
Karl Marx
vation)
A/ Ted Gurr
44

7. 9. uas
q -w -
m . (functionalism)
n. - . (social values)
J. – . (M

. m VS m d (relative depri-
vation)

R–w - a (rational
choice)

0. - a 10. u
8. g l
n. Ted Gur -Minorites at Risk:
Global View of Ethno-political
, Conflict
.
Jeramy Bray-Rational Choice Model
. of Political Violence: The Role of
Injustice and retribution

: Charles Tilly-From Mobilization to

J. m n Revolution

. Karl Marx-Capital
Theda Skocpol-States and Social
Revolutions : A Comparative Analysis

q of France, Russia and China

t
 8

3. .

9. 9.

10. 1 0. .
6 n 9.

î (Walt Whitman
Rostow)

u n. m

rh e .

n u
1.

. š w l .
10. “
l "
D Clifford Geertz
Š . James C. Scott
. Edward P. Thompson Raymond
Williams
7. Gabriel A. Almond Sidney
Verba

n. 1 Max Weber Talcott Parson

a2
.
0 m
.
8. m
1eat iin
as
in.
I.
 10

“ u n
"
a g
1. 4.

. m
.

. 5. yg u( -
2. ) s 2657
.

a D
. g .

6. m
.
V,

- . (Veto)
n
3. .

n
n. 3

u. 4
. 5
6
7
S6

7. 9.

in. n
. i . î
. u
.

.
8.
T . m I

. 10.
mu wu n u
-
.

n . D
.
. i -
J,
.

n
e
z
a
 U.

n.
".

î . u
. U
.
a. m a
.
8.
e
n. 10.

.
.
.

.
.
.

m m
5. olou▇ ▇ ▇ ▇ ▇▇ 8. al ild na m
u ou h n u
. m pam
.
n l
m i an m
*
, m s . i nau u
.
m l an ,

. m 9. u v l na▇
6. we g ni in m u ia
r n n d ia▇ D m ne ng
a u 의,

II,
m g um o gn .
, n M l an
,

Fl,
2 sm in nan o ngu
im 0. i 미
n h
7. oland▇ ▇ ▇ ▇ ▇▇ im u iu
l , ilm w u 미e
, ch -d . n

. m m n . m i

. unaen o m iamuv . il i a i

m i lim ulio ulao

a i -

a e -
l u
g 기

했09e

( C
 (

6. - 8.
m
n. .

. g )
-w .

J.

. .

| W |
19.
u
0.) m
7. n (pact) .

.
J.

. ğ - 10.
N.

. y
.
.

. . .
n
 65

I 13

“ ai
"

1. 3,

(n.) (realism) N.

. n (greed)
. ii▇ .

. (feasi-
bility) .
m li n
(horizontal inequality)
2. n (greed)
(Paul Collies) Tam ç g N
"
n. 4.

y. - n.
.
-
.n u .

. .

n
y
 13

“
"
In n
1. r (grievance)
t (feasi-
|I. bility)
. i
"s (horizontal inequality)
. 4. -

a .

2. a . -

. i m

. (realism) -
R n (greed)
. a (grievance) 15.
. (feasi-
bility) n a (dolus
. i specilis)
(horizontal inequality) R - (Raphael Lemkin)
3. y “ s . (Martin Shaw)

" . n (Ted Gurr)

(Paul Collier)
(realism) (Charles Tilly)
. n (greed)
68

6. 9.

n
l n.
D
. .
J.
. .
. 10.
7.

u y n. a
n.
.
.
. . g m

0.
.
m
8. -
n.
.

.
7.
9. Sendero Luminoso
u g
n. U. na

0. n. .
n IU. 1980
n and
iv
.7 d 1 4U n. n
1950
1960 . n
N. 1970 D n
1980
7. â
i 19. Sendero Luminoso
g
n m
n. 1960
. n 1970
n.
y 1970
1
1980
. e .
1970
J.
10.
0.
8. nl▇
1960
.
n .

.
n.) n n n - n. .
- . . .
. n n n
. n n n
. n n -
n
. n n n -
-
74

14

1. V.
1. V.
2. 1.
2. P.
3. V.
3. 3.
4. J.

5. n.

6. V.
7. V.

8. n.
8. 9.
9.
9. n.
10.
10. 3.
 75

15
ip z ih ”
s "u la
na gn
1. 4.
m –
1950-1960
n.
.
. . m
J.
. g - y i
2. -
J.
n. .
1.
. 5.
J. n. -H▇
g .
3. î n .
, m g u

n. m g
. 1950–1960 16.
. 1960
J. 1970
1980 n.
(o
. a
J.

0.
76

7.
9. e a bzn
n an
R
n. e .
. .
J.
.
. g
. 10. ing " n-
8. - "a
n.
a . . . 1950–1960
0 n . 1970
. na a 1980
. ng 0. 20
. n e
.

ae
i