Professional Documents
Culture Documents
82202 การเมืองเปรียบเทียบ
82202 การเมืองเปรียบเทียบ
82202
1
" v n
"
p na gn
.
.
.
5. u u
.
. n.
.
u .
0 gn
.
6.
u
. in.
. .
. .
3.
7
a
(D
.
. n.
J.
.
. .
4. a .
C
.
1
" a
v "
a
1. 4.
,
n
.
2. 5. n
z
|.
)
. .
r. .
3. 0. m
.
|I.
.
0. 7.
.
( .
J. z
10
8. “ 10.
"
D
D .
.
. J.
.
.
(state-in-
society approach)
D.
.
.
. a
. aa5
h
u
n
9. |I.
10.
10
2
“
n
4.
n
.
D m
1. a7 Ib6 GY 6 T
.
.
5.
U.
gi
2. a
. g
.
m g
3.
16.
|,
9
. (|V SY G.
J.
.
.
9.
ip
m unm
so iwminwita,
y lanli▇
. misamn
e we eg
.
n
u
J.
nn
.
hi
wpâ u
7. eu va
.
n. pn
.
) g
.
8. .
10.
|I.
u n m
.
R. . "
.
m yg .
. nu
.
.
u 2
r * "
1. .
in.
. "
3.
n. n
.
.
4.
2.
in.
.
(
|I.
. m p
5.
a 8.
n m u
in.
n.
.
. 1 u ur
. 9.
p
(n
n. .
g
.
J.
0.
. 10.
g
n.
. .
.
v.
z . g
g
J.
.
m ng
r
2
1. .
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. .
7. .
8. .
9.
10. 10.
16
maduuwangmuiwins(critical
theory)
tive theory)
and (bias)
a. ionnuana (individual)
2.
hemilovuvuowsnu (American
model)
(Hybrid
model)
minster model)
model)
model)
5.
3. Structuralist
Historicist
. Pragmatist
17
appropriateness)
a. assneanumiRams (logic of com-
munication)
collective action)
9.
n. assnsdnuwauseluww (logic of
interests)
7.
appropriateness)
i. amnsmnumsieens (logic of commu-
9.
collective action)
8. appropriateness)
a. araneanunaaaans (logic of com-
n.
D
J. s
Z.
m
4. ä
n.
i
.
.
.
i
g
J.
u
p
.
m -
a
.
n
a
.
i u s g B
anynna u
in. ni
n i s
T
.
R (Kenneth Arow)
a 0) a n n pn▇
ma u e p um
. m -
m m m n m 1.
ma u n
s e
. m
nju a z án m
5 | I6
Ta
m m
6.
y
(James Buchanan) i
n. Ha u â R
y um oy a
. n
n e 18.
u
. na aR ) umma l m i
â m nar g r uw
.
J
um▇ ▇ ▇
s
25
.
(Kenneth Arrow)
n.
. a
D) wa
n u a y u
n . ne
m u 1 n
5. n n
n.
.
m m n
n
7. y
. (James Buchanan)
n. a
h u
e
m
.
mm . Ha
m u
I 5
a " a iny
"
a g g
) m I e
i 5
n.
. î
.
( n
.
n. .
(
. 5
J. 1.
f.
a
J. -
a n . -
13.
gi
in.
.
.
J. m -
(
5
p au i rn " rmu is
p "
gn
(
V.
lu
n.
18 . ih▇ ▇
,.
J.
i
. - .
"
"
. T, ITT
.
. ng▇
.
n.
g 0.
5.
. m ( )
l I.
n
. an . an▇
.
g a J.
-
v
n .
6. m
in. )i -
1. -
. n n
9.
(development syndrome)
in.
7. .
in. N.
i
10.
. m
. . n
s-
. 1
a
n.
10.
o
i n
u ng
o
in. m n nj v n.
1. m n nj .
s q
n ný .
ndo▇ ▇▇ ▇
. m ná ro
19.
. . 1886
G a g
. u
.
.
1
.
6
s" g or"
1. “ "
ê a
.
9T .
. .
.
. . .
. . ( . . .
2. 5.
yam
n.
.
. .
. .
J.
. v.
. .. . . .
1717-1720 6.
(.
w
. .
.
)
.
.
36
7. m 9. 1
i . . 1886
ni . . 1886
.
. . 1886
. . . 1889
J. n . . 1889
. n 10.
ng
g
.
. l
J.
2.
3.
4.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
10.
38
0. i
in.
2ä
.
.
(D nî 0.
.
J.
a y
9. u
. Centrism
. Hegemony
. Dominator
Governance
Statism
7. o n u mam n in i (functionalism)
ua u지 a i N -pam u i s
n
I i uaem o v
a-w , m
. - w , m i
. i - J. m la p l or ou
J. m in ul ana ai au -w i ,
0. -m▇ ▇▇▇ 10. Ted Gurr
o on nu u in Minorities at Risk: A Global View of
i. u n lai▇ ▇ Ethnopolitical Conflict
o u ioya n
. i u ua▇ ▇ ▇ ▇ na ath
i iul r ig nan a i n.
. om▇ ▇ ▇ ▇ ,
u ua am nauou
. u m a ii▇ . e
u qu mam oy . n s
(shape) am▇ ▇
et v s ou ua
43
1.
nuwamuniniad(Marxist insight)
q. manninmunu (collective action)
2. state)
vation)
Chalmers Johnson
3. Charles Tilly
Karl Marx
. Ted Gurr
choice)
A. Charles Tilly
Karl Marx
vation)
A/ Ted Gurr
44
7. 9. uas
q -w -
m . (functionalism)
n. - . (social values)
J. – . (M
. m VS m d (relative depri-
vation)
R–w - a (rational
choice)
0. - a 10. u
8. g l
n. Ted Gur -Minorites at Risk:
Global View of Ethno-political
, Conflict
.
Jeramy Bray-Rational Choice Model
. of Political Violence: The Role of
Injustice and retribution
. Karl Marx-Capital
Theda Skocpol-States and Social
Revolutions : A Comparative Analysis
t
8
3. .
9. 9.
10. 1 0. .
6 n 9.
î (Walt Whitman
Rostow)
u n. m
rh e .
n u
1.
. š w l .
10. “
l "
D Clifford Geertz
Š . James C. Scott
. Edward P. Thompson Raymond
Williams
7. Gabriel A. Almond Sidney
Verba
“ u n
"
a g
1. 4.
. m
.
. 5. yg u( -
2. ) s 2657
.
a D
. g .
6. m
.
V,
- . (Veto)
n
3. .
n
n. 3
u. 4
. 5
6
7
S6
7. 9.
in. n
. i . î
. u
.
.
8.
T . m I
. 10.
mu wu n u
-
.
n . D
.
. i -
J,
.
n
e
z
a
U.
n.
".
î . u
. U
.
a. m a
.
8.
e
n. 10.
.
.
.
.
.
.
m m
5. olou▇ ▇ ▇ ▇ ▇▇ 8. al ild na m
u ou h n u
. m pam
.
n l
m i an m
*
, m s . i nau u
.
m l an ,
. m 9. u v l na▇
6. we g ni in m u ia
r n n d ia▇ D m ne ng
a u 의,
II,
m g um o gn .
, n M l an
,
Fl,
2 sm in nan o ngu
im 0. i 미
n h
7. oland▇ ▇ ▇ ▇ ▇▇ im u iu
l , ilm w u 미e
, ch -d . n
. m m n . m i
. unaen o m iamuv . il i a i
a e -
l u
g 기
했09e
( C
(
6. - 8.
m
n. .
. g )
-w .
J.
. .
| W |
19.
u
0.) m
7. n (pact) .
.
J.
. ğ - 10.
N.
. y
.
.
. . .
n
65
I 13
“ ai
"
1. 3,
(n.) (realism) N.
. n (greed)
. ii▇ .
. (feasi-
bility) .
m li n
(horizontal inequality)
2. n (greed)
(Paul Collies) Tam ç g N
"
n. 4.
y. - n.
.
-
.n u .
. .
n
y
13
“
"
In n
1. r (grievance)
t (feasi-
|I. bility)
. i
"s (horizontal inequality)
. 4. -
a .
2. a . -
. i m
. (realism) -
R n (greed)
. a (grievance) 15.
. (feasi-
bility) n a (dolus
. i specilis)
(horizontal inequality) R - (Raphael Lemkin)
3. y “ s . (Martin Shaw)
6. 9.
n
l n.
D
. .
J.
. .
. 10.
7.
u y n. a
n.
.
.
. . g m
0.
.
m
8. -
n.
.
.
7.
9. Sendero Luminoso
u g
n. U. na
0. n. .
n IU. 1980
n and
iv
.7 d 1 4U n. n
1950
1960 . n
N. 1970 D n
1980
7. â
i 19. Sendero Luminoso
g
n m
n. 1960
. n 1970
n.
y 1970
1
1980
. e .
1970
J.
10.
0.
8. nl▇
1960
.
n .
.
n.) n n n - n. .
- . . .
. n n n
. n n n
. n n -
n
. n n n -
-
74
14
1. V.
1. V.
2. 1.
2. P.
3. V.
3. 3.
4. J.
5. n.
6. V.
7. V.
8. n.
8. 9.
9.
9. n.
10.
10. 3.
75
15
ip z ih ”
s "u la
na gn
1. 4.
m –
1950-1960
n.
.
. . m
J.
. g - y i
2. -
J.
n. .
1.
. 5.
J. n. -H▇
g .
3. î n .
, m g u
n. m g
. 1950–1960 16.
. 1960
J. 1970
1980 n.
(o
. a
J.
0.
76
7.
9. e a bzn
n an
R
n. e .
. .
J.
.
. g
. 10. ing " n-
8. - "a
n.
a . . . 1950–1960
0 n . 1970
. na a 1980
. ng 0. 20
. n e
.
ae
i