Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Politics Power and The Chinese Maritime Customs
Politics Power and The Chinese Maritime Customs
of Robert Hart
Author(s): Richard S. Horowitz
Source: Modern Asian Studies , Jul., 2006, Vol. 40, No. 3 (Jul., 2006), pp. 549-581
Published by: Cambridge University Press
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3876538?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Cambridge University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to Modern Asian Studies
oo26-749X/o6/$7.50+ $o. 1o
549
2 Choubanyiwu shimo, tongzhi chao (Taipei reprint, n.d.) 40:13b [hereafter YWSM-
TZ] For a more detailed discussion of the memorandum see Richard J. Smith, John
K. Fairbank, Katherine F. Bruner, Robert Hart and China's Early Modernization: His
Journals, 1863-1866 (Cambridge MA: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard
University, 1991), 284-92, and Mary Clabaugh Wright, Last Stand of Chinese
Conservatism: The T'ung-chih Restoration, 1862-1874 (Stanford: Stanford University
Press, 1957), 263-8.
3 Bredon, 5 andpassim.
' Hosea Ballou Morse, International Relations of the Chinese Empire (London:
Longmans, Green & co., 1910-1918) 2:138-41, 190-1, 364-7.
5 Stanley F. Wright, Hart and the Chinese Customs (Belfast: Win. Mullan, 1950),
855. See also a similar account by the last foreign Inspector General L. K. Little
'Introduction' in The I. G. in Peking: Letters of Robert Hart Chinese Maritime Customs,
1868-90o7, ed. John King Fairbank, Katherine Frost Bruner, Elizabeth MacLeod
Matheson (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1975) Vol. 1, 1-34.
In the summer of 1861 Robert Hart made his first important political
alliances. He traveled to Beijing in place of his boss, H. N. Lay, who
had departed on leave to England. Hart stayed at the new British
Legation as the guest of British Minister Frederick Bruce, whose
support would later be crucial to Hart's promotion to the position of
Inspector General. Even more importantly he had numerous meetings
with Wenxiang, a Grand Councilor and the working leader of the new
Zongli Yamen, and briefer sessions with Prince Gong, which gave Hart
a chance to explain the operations of the Customs Service and discuss
plans for its expansion to new treaty ports.9 The evidence available
suggests that they hit it off exceptionally well. Although Hart probably
did not realize it at the time, he had happened into ideal sponsors: for
the pair were a rising force in Qing politics.
Less than a year earlier, in the August and September of 186o,
the Qing dynasty had been in the midst of its greatest crisis. After
four years of off and on fighting, the Arrow War (also known as the
second Opium War) was approaching a denouement, as a combined
British and French force seized the Dagu fortresses, which protected
the seaborne approaches to Tianjin, and in early September marched
towards Beijing repeatedly defeating Qing armies on the battlefield.
The foreign invasion of the north coincided with a resurgence of the
Taiping rebellion in the lower Yangzi region, with major rebellions
festering on the north China plain and in the Southwest. For anyone
remotely familiar with history, the eerie combination of domestic
uprising and foreign invasion, bore all of the characteristics of a
dynastic collapse.
8 The concept of semi-colonialism (and its alter ego informal empire) is system-
atically developed in Jurgen Osterhammel, 'Semi-Colonalism and Informal Empire
in Twentieth Century China: Towards a Framework of Analysis' in Imperialism and
After: Continuities andDiscontinuities, ed. Wolfgang Mommsen andJurgen Osterhammel
(London: 1986); see also Osterhammel, 'Britain and China 1842-1914' in The Oxford
History ofthe British Empire, Volume III: The Nineteenth Century, ed. Andrew Porter (Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1999), 146-69.
9 Bruner et al., 240-4; Richard S. Horowitz, 'Mandarins and Customs Inspectors,'
Papers on Chinese History, 7 (1998): 43-4-
The Taiping and Nian bandits multiply and are like an illness of the heart
and abdomen. Russia, whose territory adjoins ours is determined to nibble
away at our land like a silkworm, and is therefore like a threat to the arm and
shoulder. England's purpose is trade but she acts harshly and without regard
for human decency, and if we do not act to restrict her, then we will be unable
to stand on our own, and thus it is like an affliction of the legs. Therefore,
first we should suppress the Taiping and Nian bandits, next put the Russians
in order, and then deal with England.14
13 On the negotiations, see Masataka Banno, China and the West 1858--861, The
Origins ofthe Tsungli Yamen (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1964), 170-
201.
II
Robert Hart handled his early relations with the Peace Commission
group in Beijing with great cultural sensitivity. John Fairbank,
Katherine Bruner and Richard Smith make a convincing case
for Hart's 'bicultural achievement' in dealing so effectively with
his Manchu and Chinese overseers.19 But curiously missing
from their characterization is the notion of cultivating personal
relationships. In Chinese culture, at least in recent centuries,
the cultivation of personal relationships has been of exceptional
importance. Relationships bring with them expectations of mutual
assistance, and are understood to imply strong sense of reciprocity.
While direct evidence of the political implications of personal
connections is hard to come by, Chinese generally assume that
they form an important underlying structure to political activity.20
University of Chicago Press, 1957), 291-309; and Ambrose Yeo-chi King, 'Kuan-hsi
and Network Building: a Sociological Interpretation,' Daedalus 120.2 (1991): 63-84.
21 See Preston Torbert, The Ch'ing Imperial Household Department: a Study of its
Organization andPrincipal Functions, 1662- z796 (Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University
Press, 1977), ch. 4.; Banno, 27-8.
22 YWSM-XF, vol. 8, 2918-2924.
has urgent and important matters to deal with and no other resources with
which to meet the need, then negotiating loans among the people is truly
not something which could be said to be dishonorable. Indeed borrowing the
peoples' wealth to be able to firmly administer affairs also has benefits for the
people and indeed proceeds from the public interest. Furthermore, people
who lend money to the government will want to bless the country with eternal
glory. But if the loans are not repaid this is dishonorable.
2" The number of these loans is open to debate, Zhongguo renmin yinhang, comp,
Zhongguo Qingdai waizhai shi ziliao (Beijing : Zhongguojin rong chu ban she, 1991), 137
lists eighteen, but the evidence is fragmentary (see the documentation pp. 1-23).
26 Zongli Yamen Archives, Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica, Taipei
[hereafter ZY] 01-32/1 (1), Zeng-Guofan-Zongli Yamen, TZ6.6.5 (July 6, 1867).
Zongli Yamen-Hede (Robert Hart) TZ6.6.13 (July 14, 1867). On FitzRoy's concerns
see China, Mlaritime Customs, Documents Illustrative of the Origin, Development and
Activities of the Chinese Customs Service (Shanghai: Statistical Department of the Ins-
pectorate General of Customs, 1937-194o), vi, 228.
III
3' David F. Rennie, Peking and the Pekinese During the First Year of the British Emba
Peking (London:John Murray, 1864), vol. 1, 264.
32 Xi Yufu, et al., comps., Huangchao zhengdian leizuan (n.p., 1903), o10:1-4b. I have
not found an English translation of the regulations.
33 L. K. Little, 11. This follows Hart's view in Circular No. 8 discussed below-but
ignores subsequent experience.
34 On institutional controls see Thomas Metzger, Internal Organizations of the Ching
Bureaucracy: Legal, Normative, and Communications Aspects (Cambridge Mass.: Harvard
University Press, 1973), on the communications system, Silas Hsiu-liang Wu 'The
Memorial Systems of The Ch'ing Dynasty (1644-1911).' Harvard Journal of Asiatic
Studies, 27. (1967): 7-75.
37 The relationship between individual Customs officers and the private staffs
of provincial officials deserves more attention. Gustav Detring was very close to
Li Hongzhang, and at Li's request, remained commissioner at Tianjin for two decades
and was sometimes viewed as a member of Li's mufu.
38 Huangchao zhengdian leizuan, 10 1o: i b-2.
39 Robert Hart 'Circular No. 8 of 1864,' in China, Imperial Maritime Customs, IV, Ser
Series No. 7: Inspector General's Circulars: First Series, 1861-1 875 (Shanghai: Inspector
General of Customs 1879), 4. Another important expression of essentially the s
ideas were the Provisional Instructions for the Guidance of the In-Door Staff (Shangh
1878). The copy at UCLA's Young Research Library was originally in the possess
of Customs Commissioner Alfred Hippisley, and marginal notations indicate it
taken very seriously.
40 Burlingame to Seward, 5July 1864 in Papers Relating to Foreign Affairs Accompanyin
the Annual Message of the President to the Second Session Thirty-Eight Congress, Par
(Washington: Government Printing Office, 1865), 436-7; Little, 12-13.
IV
4 Hart, 'Circular No. 8,' 5. See Stanley Wright, 262-7. For a retrospective account
see Little, 15-17.
5 Smith, Fairbank, Bruner, 161-2, 164, 166.
50 Ibid.
51 Ibid. For praise of Drew's performance in Jiujiang see Hart-Campbell, 26
February, 1869, in Fairbank, Bruner and Matheson, 47.
The realities of the semi-colonial system meant that Hart could not
depend on Qing patronage alone to establish and retain a position
of influence. In the 186os Britain remained unchallenged as the
preeminent western power in Asia, and British concurrence was
essential to making the treaty system work. However well he might
work with his Chinese bosses, Hart knew that the British had to accept
the way that he ran the Customs Service, or pressure for his ouster and
demands to renegotiate the treaties would quickly follow. Maintaining
good relations with British diplomats was as important to the I. G. as
his dealings with Qing authorities. Hart was well equipped for this.
Having begun his career as a British consul, Hart knew British policy
and practices, and did not hesitate to express his loyalty as a British
subject. But Hart was also fortunate that his ascent to the leadership
of the Customs occurred when it did. Both Sir Frederick Bruce
(who served from 186o to 1864), and his successor, Sir Ruthe
Alcock (1864-1869) approached diplomacy in China with un
moderation among nineteenth-century British diplomats. The
saw increasingly aggressive diplomacy aimed at opening China
foreigners, concluding with consul Harry Parkes manufacturin
Arrow incident and John Bowring turning it into a reason for
Following Alcock's departure in 1869, the brilliant Sinologue Th
Wade bombarded the Zongli Yamen with incessant protests
minor issues, and twisted the Margary Affair, a sad incident in w
a British official traveling overland to Burma had been murdered,
reason for extorting further concessions. It is hard to imagine
with either regime, Hart would have been allowed the free han
got from Bruce and Alcock. Hart took advantage of the situa
creating an organization that was relentlessly making the
to both Ministers that the Customs served British and Chinese
interests; meanwhile he discreetly avoided taking public positio
British policy.53
* Thirty years later in the aftermath of the Boxer War, Hart did play a
trying to shape British opinion and to moderate the vengeful attitude of poli
and the press. His essays were later collected in the volume Thesef
(London: Chapman, 1903).
54 Horowitz, 'Mandarins and Customs Inspectors.,' 44-7.
" Smith, Fairbank, and Bruner, 142.
60 For a careful account of these negotiations, see Mary Clabaugh Wright, Last
Stand of Chinese Conservatism, 279-95.
61 British Documents on Foreign Affairs: Reports and Papers from the Foreign Office
Confidential Prints Part I, Series E., volume 20 China's Rehabilitation and Treaty Revision,
1866-1869 (Silver Spring: University Publications, 1994), 275.
62 British Documents, 276. See also the entry for 12 June 1868 in the unpublished
manuscript Journal of Robert Hart, Department of Special Collections, Queen's
University Library, Belfast.
63 British Documents, 285. Entries in Hart's unpublished Journal for the months
of June and July indicates frequent meetings with the Yamen, and assessments of
Wenxiang's positions that coincide with the opinions expressed in the letters sent to
Alcock a day or two later.Journal of Robert Hart, entries for 12June, 29June, i July,
4July, 13July, 15July, l7July 1868.
64 British Documents, 287-88.
65 British Documents, 288.
66 British Documents, 30o-3. Wenxiang argued that foreign residence could only be
allowed outside the Treaty Ports if they were subject to Chinese law.
67 Mary Clabaugh Wright, 290o-5.
VI
When Hart's 'Bystanders View', along with Wade's even more blunt
treatise was circulated among senior Qing officials in 1866, the
response, even from those most ardent advocates of self-strengthening
reforms, was overwhelmingly negative. Guanwen, a veteran Manchu
official then serving as the Governor General of Hunan and Hubei
noted that the main beneficiaries of these proposals would be
69 YWSM-TZ 41:41-41b.
70 Morse, 3: 404-5.
71 Little, 3; Hu Sheng, Imperialism and Chinese Politics (Beijing: Foreign La
Press, 1981), 62-9.