Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Final Revision (For Checking)
Final Revision (For Checking)
Presented by
Bindoy, Christ Ernest R.
Caldo, Alvin T.
Mendoza, Elijah James
III-A APDEV
ROMMEL L. DORIN
June 2023
Table of Contents
Page No.
Dedication i
Acknowledgement ii
Approval Sheet iii
Project Scope
Management Plan
Project Scope Management Plan
A. Project Description
The Quintin De Borja Health Center Information System focuses on online medical
consultation so you don't have to wait in a Health Care Center or at the doctors' office to
be seen. Instead, you can securely and confidentially submit your information and
symptoms at any time and wait for a response. The Quintin De Borja Health Center
Information System is available 24 hours a day; if you wake up in the middle of the night
feeling ill, or if you get home after a long day and feel too ill to go out again, the Quintin
De Borja Health Center Information System can provide you with immediate answers.
When you phone the doctor's office to make an appointment, it can often take hours,
days, or even weeks to be seen. Of course, this is not acceptable for many people,
particularly because waiting extended times to see a doctor for a medical concern can
be stressful. Instead, you can access Quintin De Borja Health Center Information
System from your device. This is also a very useful service for the elderly or those who
are frail and cannot easily travel to the doctors from their homes
Software
Requirement
Specification
A. Introduction
B. Software Requirement
PHP
is a free and open-source server-side language that is an acronym for
Hypertext Preprocessor. It is a multi-purpose language created and
maintained by a large community. PHP is all about handling the back-end or
server-side architecture of a website or online application. As a result, PHP
code is executed on the server, while the client-side just receives plain HTML
code that is shown to users via a web browser.
Javascript
is a known programming language that allows for dynamic and interactive
website activity. is a computer language that, along with CSS and HTML,
serves as the foundation of the World Wide Web. On the client side, over
98% of websites use JavaScript to control the operation of the website, with
external libraries being commonly used. All major web browsers have a
JavaScript engine that executes code on the devices of users. JavaScript
also supports dynamic typing, prototype-based object-oriented programming, and
first class functions.
CSS
is a website style defining language. may also define the appearance and
layout of a document produced in markup language. It allows the material to
be converted to a variety of devices.
MySQL
is widely used in a variety of applications including content management
systems, e-commerce platforms, data-driven websites, and business
applications. Its versatility, power, and extensive community support have
made it a popular choice for database management in both small projects and
enterprise-level systems.
B4. Others
XAMPP
is an acronym that stands for cross-platform, Apache, MySQL, PHP, and Perl,
and it allows you to build WordPress sites on your computer's local web
server. A WordPress localhost installation is significantly more safe since it
gives you your own unique and private playground free of any potential
threats. Not only that, but your website will load much faster than if it were
hosted online.
C. Hardware Requirement
D1.1 Description
Allows patients to schedule an e-consultation and face-to-face
appointments at the health center. Doctors/Nurses to view the patient's
consultation and the doctor approves the patient's personal consultation
D1.2 Simulus and Response Sequences
The patient fills out an e-consultation or in-person appointment form,
submits the form, and the doctor/nurse will respond to or approve your
consultation and in-person appointment
D1.3 Functional Requirements
The patient must have an account to schedule an appointment and for
consultation
D2. Content Manager
D2.1 Description
This allows the patients to view the latest News, Announcement and
Events of the Health Care Center
D2.2 Simulus and Response Sequences
The patient can scroll down and they will see the news, announcement,
and event of the Health Care Center
D2.3 Functional Requirements
With or Without an account the patient will see the news, announcement,
and event of the Health Care Center they will just Scroll down to the home
page
D3.1 Description
This shows the profile of the Doctor, Nurses, and patient and they can
also edit their profile
D4.1 Description
This shows the present and pass consultation and appointment of the
patient
D4.2 Simulus and Response Sequences
The doctor/nurse can view the present and pass appointment or
consultation of the patient
D4.3 Functional Requirements
The doctor/nurse must have an account made by the admin to view the
patient’s present and pass appointment or consultation
Module 3:
User Interface
Requirement
Specification
A. Introduction
The purpose of this study is intended for the Quintin De Borja Health
Center Appointment System capabilities to assist patients in scheduling check-
ups, medications, and healthcare services. Security levels, graphical user
interface and keyboard shortcuts that allow the system to be used more
efficiently and productively.
B. Task Profiles
Table 3.1
User Task Profiles
Features User Type Security Level Task Details
Description:
This is a landing page of the system where you can see the News &
Announcement
Description:
This is a landing page of the system where you can see the Contact Us and
Email address of our system .
Description:
This is the Log in Page and Sign up button to create an account whether it's patient or
for the health staff.
Description:
This is the Register Page. You can register an account whether it's patient or for the
health staff.
Description:
This image F2f Appointment Page. Patients can schedule the appointment so
that the health staff can see the description.
Description:
This image E- Consult Page. Patients can schedule E- consultation so that the
health staff can see the description.
Project Title: Quitin De Borja Web page ID: 6
Health Center
Appointment
System
Developers: Quad - Tek Web page Title: Account Manager
Page
Accessibility Patient, Admin Database: Table_user
Level:
Description:
This image is Account manager. You can view and edit your personal
information.
Project Title: Quitin De Borja Web page ID: 7
Health Center
Appointment
System
Developers: Quad - Tek Web page Title: Account Manager
Page
Accessibility Patient, Admin Database: Table_user
Level:
Description:
This image is of an account manager. You can edit your account details and your
profile picture so the health staff can recognize it, and you can see your current and
previous scheduled appointments or e-consultations.
Description:
This image is Account manager. You can see your current and previous
scheduled appointments.
Description:
This image is Account manager. You can see your current and previous
scheduled Econsults.
Description:
This image is the Home Page. You can view the notification button to see your
schedule when your appointment is approved and You can view the services, about,
news & events.
Description:
This image is a admin home page. You can view the home page,services,
account manager and you can view the live chat button to communicate with the health
staff about your condition.
Description:
This is the Health Staff Account Manager. You can view your personal
information, edit the account details, edit the profile picture, and the patient can
recognize it. You can also see the patient’s current and previous scheduled
appointments or e-consultations.
Description:
This is the Health Staff Account Manager. You can edit your account details and
your profile picture so the patient can recognize them.
Description:
This is the Health Staff Account Manager. You can see the appointment list, and
you can confirm the appointment with the patient. You can see the patient’s current and
previous scheduled appointments and also you can also save the data of the
appointments appointments.
Description:
This is the Health Staff Account Manager. You can see the econsults list, and
you can confirm the appointment with the patient. You can see the patient’s current and
previous scheduled econsult appointments and you can also save the data of the
econsult appointments.
Description:
This image is the schedule appointment page. Health staff can view the patient’s
current and previous schedule of f2f appointments or e-consultations, set a date and
time for the patient, and approve the patient's schedule.
Project Title: Quitin De Borja Web page ID: 17
Health Center
Appointment
System
Developers: Quad - Tek Web page Title: Admin login page
Accessibility Admin Database: Table_admin
Level:
Description:
This image is an admin login page. Admin can log in to the system so that admin
can be manage of the system.
Project Title: Quitin De Borja Web page ID: 18
Health Center
Appointment
System
Developers: Quad - Tek Web page Title: Admin Home Page
Accessibility Admin Database: Table_admin
Level:
Description:
This image is an admin home page. Admins can view the home page with f2f
appointments, econsults, accounts, and edit the events of the Quintin de Borja.
Project Title: Quitin De Borja Web page ID: 19
Health Center
Appointment
System
Developers: Quad - Tek Web page Title: Admin Pending
Appointment
Accessibility Admin Database: Table_f2f
Level: appointment
Description:
This image is an admin Pending Appointment. The admin can view and edit the
pending appointments of the patients, and the admin can also save the data of the
pending appointments.
Project Title: Quitin De Borja Web page ID: 20
Health Center
Appointment
System
Developers: Quad - Tek Web page Title: Admin Confirmed
Appointment
Accessibility Admin Database: Table_f2f
Level: appointment
Description:
This image is an admin confirmed appointment. Admin can view and edit to
Confirmed Appointment and the admin can also save the data on the confirmed
appointments.
Project Title: Quitin De Borja Web page ID: 21
Health Center
Appointment
System
Developers: Quad - Tek Web page Title: Admin Void
Appointment
Accessibility Admin Database: Table_f2f
Level: appointment
Description:
This image is an admin-void appointment. The admin can view and edit
appointments, and the admin can also save the data on the void appointments.
Project Title: Quitin De Borja Web page ID: 22
Health Center
Appointment
System
Developers: Quad - Tek Web page Title: Admin Finished
Appointment
Accessibility Admin Database: Table_f2f
Level: appointment
Description:
This image is an admin finished appointment. The admin can view the result and
edit the appointment, and the admin can also save the data on the finished
appointments.
Project Title: Quitin De Borja Web page ID: 23
Health Center
Appointment
System
Developers: Quad - Tek Web page Title: Admin E- consult
Accessibility Admin Database: Table_econsult
Level:
Description:
This image is an admin e-consult. The admin can view the current and previous
schedules of patients and edit the e-consults of patients, and the admin can also save
the data on the e-consult appointments.
Project Title: Quitin De Borja Web page ID: 24
Health Center
Appointment
System
Developers: Quad - Tek Web page Title: Admin Account
Manager
Accessibility Admin Database: Table_admin
Level:
Description:
This image is an admin account manager. Admins can edit the admin account
profile details, and they can also choose a file for the profile picture.
Project Title: Quitin De Borja Web page ID: 25
Health Center
Appointment
System
Developers: Quad - Tek Web page Title: Admin Health Staff
Database
Accessibility Admin Database: Table_admin
Level:
Description:
This image is an admin health staff database. Admin can edit, suspend, or delete
accounts of the health staff, and admin can also save the data in the health staff
database.
Project Title: Quitin De Borja Health Web page ID: 26
Center Appointment
System
Developers: Quad - Tek Web page Title: Admin Patients
Database
Accessibility Admin Database: Table_admin
Level:
Description:
This image is an admin patient database. Admins can edit and delete patient
accounts, and they can also save the data in the patient database.
Project Title: Quitin De Borja Web page ID: 27
Health Center
Appointment
System
Developers: Quad - Tek Web page Title: Admin Content
Manager
Accessibility Admin Database: Table_events
Level:
Description:
This image is an admin content manager. Admins can view the list of news and
events, edit events, and delete events at the Quintin De Borja Health Center.
Module 5:
Database
Requirement
Specification
A. Introduction
The purpose of this study is to define the database requirements of the system,
including the identification of a relational database management system (RDBMS).
Naming conventions, a data dictionary, and a schema-relationship diagram are the
focus of this document. To ensure quality care, a database system must be able to
manage patient records, appointments, and other health-related data. The
effectiveness and quality of health services provided in a health center can be
improved by a well-designed database system
My SQL
B2. Description
C. List of Tables
Table 5.1 List of Tables
Table Name Description
Table_admin This table stores the id, email and password
of the admin and admin values that will be
needed to access and login the admin page.
Table_comment This table stores the id, name, email
address, comment and the date commented
of the user.
Table_econsult This table stores the details of the patient in
registration for econsult
Table_events This table stores the images of the updated
event’s in the Health Center.
Table_f2fappointment This table stores the details of the patient in
registration for face to face appointment.
Table_medicalprofessional This table stores the health staff account
credentials.
Table_user This row stores the patient account
credentials.
Total Tables: 7
Testing and
Evaluation
A. Introduction
The purpose of this study is to test and review the Quintin De Borja Health
Center Appointment System's capabilities to determine if they meet the required
specifications and objectives.
Table 6.1
Respondent’s Gender
Gender Percentage Number of Responses
Male 60% 30
Female 40% 20
Table 6.1 Above discusses the Respondent’s Gender. 60% of the respondents are the
Male with 30 Responses while the remaining 40% of the respondents are the Female
with 20 Responses
Age Group
50 Responses
Table 6.2
Respondent’s Age Group
Age Group Percentage Number of Responses
18-24 12% 6
25-34 24% 12
35-44 22% 11
45-54 24% 12
55-64 18% 9
Table 6.2 Above discusses the Respondents Age Group. 24% of the respondents are
between the ages of 25 to 34 with 12 responses while 24% of the respondents are
between the ages of 45 to 54 with 12 responses, 22% of the respondents are between
the ages of 35 to 44 with 11 responses, 18% of the respondents are between the ages
of 55 to 64 with 9 responses , 12% of the respondents are between the ages of 18 to
24 with 12 responses
Category
50 Responses
Table 6.3
Respondent’s Category
Category Percentage Number of Responses
Patient 62% 31
Health Staff (Doctor, 20% 10
Nurse, Admin)
CCIS Professor 2% 1
I.T Professional 16% 8
Table 6.3 Above discusses the Respondent’s Category. 62% of the respondents are the
Patient with 31 responses while 20% of the respondents are the Health Staff(Doctor,
Nurse, Admin) with 10, 16% of the respondents are the I.T Professional with 8
responses, 2% are the CCIS Professor with 1 response
Functional Suitability
Functional Completeness
Does the system cover all specified tasks and user objectives?
50 Responses
Table 6.4
Functional Completeness
Functional Does the system cover all specified Percentage Number of
Completeness tasks and user objectives? Responses
5-Strongly Agree 60% 24
4-Agree 40% 19
3-Neither or Nor Agree 10% 5
2-Disagree 0% 0
1-Strongly Disagree 0% 0
Table 6.4 Above discusses the Functional Completeness of the System . 50% of
respondents answered 5-Strongly Agree with 24 responseswhile 40% of respondents
answered 4-Agree with 19 responses, 10% of respondents answered 3-Neither or Nor
Agree with 5 responses.
Functional Correctness
Can the system provide correct results with the needed degree of precision?
50 Responses
Table 6.5
Functional Correctness
Functional Can the system provide correct Percentage Number of
Correctness results with the needed degree of Responses
precision?
5-Strongly Agree 26% 13
4-Agree 62% 31
3-Neither or Nor Agree 12% 6
2-Disagree 0% 0
1-Strongly Disagree 0% 0
Table 6.5 Above discusses the Functional Correctness of the System. 62% of
respondents answered 4-Agree with 31 responses while 26% of respondents answered
5-Strongly Agree with 13 responses, 12% of respondents answered 3-Neither or Nor
Agree 6 responses.
Functional Appropriateness
Does the system’s function facilitate the accomplishment of specified tasks and
objectives?
50 Responses
Table 6.6
Functional Appropriateness
Functional Does the system’s function facilitate Percentage Number of
Appropriateness the accomplishment of specified tasks Responses
and objectives?
5-Strongly Agree 32% 16
4-Agree 52% 26
3-Neither or Nor Agree 16% 8
2-Disagree 0% 0
1-Strongly Disagree 0% 0
Table 6.6 Above discusses the Functional Appropriateness of the System. 52% of
respondents answered 4-Agree with 26 while 32% of respondents answered 5-Strongly
Agree with 16 Responses, 16% of respondents answered 3-Neither or Nor Agree Agree
6 responses.
Reliability
Maturity
Does the system meet the needs of its users under normal operations?
50 Responses
Table 6.7
Maturity
Maturity Does the system meet the needs of its Percentage Number of
users under normal operations? Responses
5-Strongly Agree 20% 10
4-Agree 60% 30
3-Neither or Nor Agree 20% 10
2-Disagree 0% 0
1-Strongly Disagree 0% 0
Table 6.7 Above discusses the Maturity of the System. 60% of respondents answered
4-Agree with 30 responses while 20% of respondents answered 5-Strongly Agree with
10 responses, 20% of respondents answered 3-Neither or Nor Agree with 10
responses.
Availability
Can the system be operational and accessible at a time needed for use?
50 Responses
Table 6.8
Availability
Availability Can the system be operational and Percentage Number of
accessible at a time needed for use? Responses
5-Strongly Agree 20% 10
4-Agree 54% 27
3-Neither or Nor Agree 24% 12
2-Disagree 2% 1
1-Strongly Disagree 0% 0
Table 6.8 Above discusses the Avalability of the system. 54% of respondents answered
4-Agree with 27 responses while 20% of respondents answered 5-Strongly Agree with
10 , 24% of respondents answered 3-Neither or Nor Agree with 12 responses, 2% of
respondents answered 2-Disagree with 1 responses.
Recoverability
During disconnection, system recover and re-establish the system to its desired state?
50 Responses
Table 6.9
Recoverability
Recoverability During disconnection, system recover Percentage Number of
and re-establish the system to its Responses
desired state?
5-Strongly Agree 16% 8
4-Agree 52% 26
3-Neither or Nor Agree 32% 16
2-Disagree 0% 0
1-Strongly Disagree 0% 0
Table 6.9 Above discusses the Recoverability of the system. 52% of respondents
answered 4-Agree with 26 respondents while 32% of respondents answered 3-Neither
or Nor Agree with 16 respondents, 16% of respondents answered 5-Strongly Agree with
8 respondents.
Usability
Appropriateness Recognizability
Can the system be easily recognized by users as an appropriate product or system to
solve their needs?
50 Responses
Table 6.10
Appropriateness Recognizability
Appropriateness Can the system be easily recognized Percentage Number of
Recognizability by users as an appropriate product or Responses
system to solve their needs?
5-Strongly Agree 30% 15
4-Agree 54% 27
3-Neither or Nor Agree 16% 8
2-Disagree 0% 0
1-Strongly Disagree 0% 0
Table 6.10 Above discusses the Appropriateness Recognizability of the system. 54% of
respondents answered 4-Agree with 27 responses while 30% of respondents answered
5-Strongly Agree with 15 respondent, 16% of respondents answered 3-Neither or Nor
Agree with 8 respondents.
Learnability
Can the system be learnt more easily?
50 Responses
Table 6.11
Learnability
Learnability Can the system be learnt more Percentage Number of
easily? Responses
5-Strongly Agree 36% 18
4-Agree 36% 18
3-Neither or Nor Agree 28% 14
2-Disagree 0% 0
1-Strongly Disagree 0% 0
Table 6.11 Above discusses the Learnability of the System. 36% of respondents
answered 5-Strongly Agree with 18 respondents while 30% of respondents answered 4-
Agree with 18 respondents, 28% of respondents answered 3-Neither or Nor Agree with
14 respondents.
Operability
Can the system be easily operated and controlled?
50 Responses
Table 6.12
Operability
Operability Can the system be easily operated Percentage Number of
and controlled? Responses
5-Strongly Agree 34% 17
4-Agree 36% 18
3-Neither or Nor Agree 30% 15
2-Disagree 0% 0
1-Strongly Disagree 0% 0
Table 6.12 Above discusses the Operability of the System. 36% of respondents
answered 4-Agree with 18 respondents while 34% of respondents answered 5-Strongly
Agree with 17 respondents, 30% of respondents answered 3-Neither or Nor Agree with
15 respondents.
Table 6.13
User Error Protection
User error Does the system protect users Percentage Number of
protection against making errors? Responses
5-Strongly Agree 24% 12
4-Agree 50% 25
3-Neither or Nor Agree 26% 13
2-Disagree 0% 0
1-Strongly Disagree 0% 0
Table 6.13 Above discusses the User error protection of the System. 50% of
respondents answered 4-Agree with 25 respondents while 26% of respondents
answered 3-Neither or Nor Agree with 13 respondents, 24% of respondents answered
5-Strongly Agree with 12 respondents.
Table 6.14
User interface Aesthetics
User interface Does the system user interface look Percentage Number of
Aesthetics pleasant and satisfactory? Responses
5-Strongly Agree 38% 17
4-Agree 55% 25
3-Neither or Nor Agree 7% 8
2-Disagree 0% 0
1-Strongly Disagree 0% 0
Table 6.14 Above discusses the User interface aesthetics User Interface Aesthetics of
the System. 55% of respondents answered 4-Agree with 25 respondents while 38% of
respondents answered 5-Strongly Agree with 17 respondents, 7% of respondents
answered 3-Neither or Nor Agree with 8 respondents.
Accessibility
Can the system be accessed by specified users under specified conditions?
50 Responses
Table 6.15
Accessibility
Accesibility Can the system be accessed by Percentage Number of
specified users under specified Responses
conditions?
5-Strongly Agree 14% 16
4-Agree 54% 27
3-Neither or Nor Agree 14% 7
2-Disagree 0% 0
1-Strongly Disagree 0% 0
Table 6.15 Above discusses the Accessibility of the System. 54% of respondents
answered 4-Agree with 27 respondents while 32% of respondents answered 5-Strongly
Agree with 16 respondents, 14% of respondents answered 3-Neither or Nor Agree with
7 respondents.
Supportability
Can the system provide basic operational instructions and hints to its users when in
operation?
50 Responses
Figure 6.16 shows the result of the (50) respondents to the Supportability of the System.
54% of respondents answered 4-Agree while 28% of respondents answered 5-Strongly
Agree, 18% of respondents answered 3-Neither or Nor Agree.
Table 6.16
Supportability
Supportability Can the system provide basic Percentage Number of
operational instructions and hints to Responses
its users when in operation?
5-Strongly Agree 28% 14
4-Agree 56% 27
3-Neither or Nor Agree 18% 9
2-Disagree 0% 0
1-Strongly Disagree 0% 0
Table 6.16 Above discusses the Supportability of the System. 54% of respondents
answered 4-Agree with 27 respondents while 28% of respondents answered 5-Strongly
Agree with 14 respondents, 18% of respondents answered 3-Neither or Nor Agree with
9 respondents.
Performance Efficiency
Time Behavior
Can the system response and process events faster?
50 Responses
Table 6.17
Time Behavior
Time Behavior Can the system response and Percentage Number of
process events faster? Responses
5-Strongly Agree 32% 16
4-Agree 46% 23
3-Neither or Nor Agree 22% 11
2-Disagree 0% 0
1-Strongly Disagree 0% 0
Table 6.17 Above discusses the Time Behavior of the System. 46% of respondents
answered 4-Agree with 23 respondents while 32% of respondents answered 5-Strongly
Agree with 16 respondents, 22% of respondents answered 3-Neither or Nor Agree with
11 respondents.
Resource Utilization
Can the system utilize information resources efficiently?
50 Responses
Table 6.18
Resource Utilization
Resource Can the system utilize information Percentage Number of
Utilization resources efficiently? Responses
5-Strongly Agree 20% 10
4-Agree 52% 26
3-Neither or Nor Agree 28% 14
2-Disagree 0% 0
1-Strongly Disagree 0% 0
Table 6.18 Above discusses the Resource Utilization of the System. 52% of
respondents answered 4-Agree with 26 respondents while 28% of respondents
answered 3-Neither or Nor Agree with 14 respondents, 20% of respondents answered
5-Strongly Agree with 10 respondents.
Capacity
Do the system parameters meet their system requirements?
50 Responses
Table 6.19
Capacity
Capacity Do the system parameters meet their Percentage Number of
system requirements? Responses
5-Strongly Agree 28% 14
4-Agree 38% 19
3-Neither or Nor Agree 34% 17
2-Disagree 0% 0
1-Strongly Disagree 0% 0
Table 6.19 Above discusses the Capacity of the System. 38% of respondents answered
4-Agree with 19 respondents while 34% of respondents answered 3-Neither or Nor
Agree 17 respondents, 28% of respondents answered 5-Strongly Agree with 14
respondents.
Security
Confidentiality
Can the system ensure that information resources are accessible only to those
authorized to have access?
50 Responses
Table 6.20
Confidentiality
Confidentiality Can the system ensure that Percentage Number of
information resources are accessible Responses
only to those authorized to have
access?
5-Strongly Agree 30% 14
4-Agree 50% 23
3-Neither or Nor Agree 20% 9
2-Disagree 0% 0
1-Strongly Disagree 0% 0
Table 6.20 Above discusses the Confidentiality of the System. 50% of respondents
answered 4-Agree with 23 respondents while 30% of respondents answered 5-Strongly
Agree with 14 respondents, 20% of respondents answered 3-Neither or Nor Agree with
9 respondents.
Integrity
Does the system prevent unauthorized access to information resources or modification
of data?
50 Responses
Table 6.21
Integrity
Integrity Does the system prevent Percentage Number of
unauthorized access to information Responses
resources or modification of data?
5-Strongly Agree 26% 13
4-Agree 48% 24
3-Neither or Nor Agree 24% 12
2-Disagree 2% 1
1-Strongly Disagree 0% 0
Table 6.21 Above discusses the Integrity of the System. 48% of respondents answered
4-Agree with 24 respondents while 26% of respondents answered 5-Strongly Agree with
13 respondents, 24% of respondents answered 3-Neither or Nor Agree with 12
respondents,2% Disagree with 1 respondent.
Accountability
Can the system uniquely trace or account for an action or event of an entity?
50 Responses
Table 6.22
Accountability
Accountability Can the system uniquely trace or Percentage Number of
account for an action or event of an Responses
entity?
5-Strongly Agree 26% 13
4-Agree 44% 22
3-Neither or Nor Agree 28% 14
2-Disagree 0% 0
1-Strongly Disagree 2% 1
Table 6.22 Above discusses the Accountability of the System. 44% of respondents
answered 4-Agree with 22 respondents while 28% of respondents answered 3-Neither
or Nor Agree with 14 respondents , 26% of respondents answered 5-Strongly Agree
with 13 respondents, 2% Strongly Disagree 1 respondent.
Authenticity
Can the system be used to identify its users and resources?
50 Responses
Table 6.23
Authenticity
Authenticity Can the system be used to identify Percentage Number of
its users and resources? Responses
5-Strongly Agree 31% 15
4-Agree 47% 23
3-Neither or Nor Agree 18% 9
2-Disagree 2% 1
1-Strongly Disagree 2% 1
Table 6.23 Above discusses the Authenticity of the System. 47% of respondents
answered 4-Agree with 23 respondents while 31% of respondents answered 5-Strongly
Agree with 15 respondents, 18% of respondents answered 3-Neither or Nor Agree with
9 respondents, 2% of respondents answered 2-Disagree with 1 respondents, 2% of
respondents answered 1-Strongly Disagree with 1 respondents.
Achievability
Does the system preserve and protect its past records for future references?
50 Responses
Scoring System
Verbal Interpretation Range
Needs Improvement 1.00-1.80
Below Expectation 1.81-2.60
Meets Expectation 2.61-3.40
Exceed Expectation 3.41-4.20
Exceptional 4.21-5.00
Completed User 33
Stories
Percent Complete 100%
(System) as of April
10, 2023
Percentage =No. of completed U.S. / Total No. of U.S. x 100 Note:
● To qualify for Midterm Defense you need 85% to 90% completion
rate (system).
● To qualify for Final Defense you need 100% completion rate
(system) with user acceptance evaluation.
● This form must be submitted weekly in PDF format in our TBL
along with the User Stories. (Project Manager will upload)
E. Revision Checklist
Team Name: QUAD-TEK Date of Defense: 12/15/22
Members: Role:
MENDOZA, ELIJAH JAMES MAIN PROGRAMMER
BINDOY, CHRIST ERNEST DOCUMENTATION / GROUP SECRETARY
CALDO, ALVIN ASST. PROGRAMMER, UI DESIGNER / FRONTEND
System
As a Patient Page:
• Use on screen notification instead of Modal in Scheduling Face to Face and EConsultation.
• Can view the the patient’s present and previous consultation.
• Fix the timestamp and include Uploading of Results in Live Chat.
• Revisions on the User Stories As an Admin Page:
• Suspend the account of the Patient if 150 days deactivate. If 2 years deactivate remove the
account.
• Admin can view the schedule and approved schedule of the patient.
• Admin can edit the personal information of the Doctor.
• Revisions on the User Stories As a Doctor Page:
• A Nurse will record the vital signs and patients complain and endorse it to the Doctor
• Revisions on the User Stories
Features:
- Scheduling Face to Face Appointment & E-Consult
- Content Manager
- Live Chat
- Queueing Generation
- Report Sales
- Account Manager - Patient Manager
Panelled by:
REVIEWED
Rommel Dorin
F. Project Proposal Form
G. Turnitin Certification
H. Endorsement for Final Defense
I. Acceptance Form of Technical Adviser
J. Client’s Transcript
K. Client’s Reply Letter
March 15, 2023
Elijah James Mendoza
Project Leader
QUAD-TEK, University of Makati