1. Encik Arumugam is the registered owner of the car and insured, so he can initiate the claim for the accident since it was his car.
2. The type of insurance was not specified, but the discussion centered around whether it was comprehensive or third party insurance.
3. Encik Luqman, who was driving but not the registered owner, cannot initiate the claim himself unless he was listed as a named driver on the insurance policy.
1. Encik Arumugam is the registered owner of the car and insured, so he can initiate the claim for the accident since it was his car.
2. The type of insurance was not specified, but the discussion centered around whether it was comprehensive or third party insurance.
3. Encik Luqman, who was driving but not the registered owner, cannot initiate the claim himself unless he was listed as a named driver on the insurance policy.
1. Encik Arumugam is the registered owner of the car and insured, so he can initiate the claim for the accident since it was his car.
2. The type of insurance was not specified, but the discussion centered around whether it was comprehensive or third party insurance.
3. Encik Luqman, who was driving but not the registered owner, cannot initiate the claim himself unless he was listed as a named driver on the insurance policy.
1. Who has the locus to initiate the accident claim ? 2. What was the type of the insurance ?
Encik Luqman's Case
(2023/1/12 00:44) Have to check on the cover note of Encik Arumugam's insurance. Nope, since the process of changing name at the JPJ had not it does cover to the Damage to your vehicle due to accident been done yet a. if comprehensive cover ( 1st Part Policy ) Encik Luqman? 1. if initiate claim against the insurance company, the NCD ( No effect ? Claims discount ) will become zero 2. Later, insurer have to pay a higher price of insurance without Encik Arumugam ? b. Third party (3rd Party Policy) the discount since it has been used for the claims Yes, since Encik Arumugan is the insured and the registered owner of the car. 3. Who can initiate the claim since not the registered owner of the car who meet with accident ? what it means ? 1. if we have accident with other parties and the other parties who are at fault, we can claim on the other parties insurance it does not cover your own car damages but only to the other and it does not effect our own NCD parties' property have to check on the car insurance policy Cannot, since Encik Luqman does not have exchange the informations with the other parties and does not have any If it was 1st Party Policy( Comprehensive ) 2. Whether we can proceed with this Third party insurance ? information regarding the other parties car
is there any possibilities to get that required information ?
next step, check whether it was for 'All Driver' or 'Named Driver' Nope, unless Encik Luqman has the registered number of the ? other parties' car. Then a proper research could be conducted.
1. If All driver, no problem, Encik Arumugam still can proceed
with the claim since the insurance policy provide that anyone who had been authorized to drive that car, the owner of the car still can proceed with own claims.
2. If Named driver, can proceed with initiate claim if the person
who met with accident is registered under 'Named driver' p/s: How to registered name driver ? actually it can be done at purchasing the insurance policy and have to pay RM 10 for the third name driver and so forth since the first two name driver is free of charge
3. If the person were not under 'Named Driver'. Actually the
owner of the car still can proceed with the claim but the owner of car have to pay for the compulsory excess which amounting of RM400, only then you can proceed with claims. Therefore, it is advisable to take all driver coverage since the beginning as it will only cost you RM 20 to get all driver coverage.
“Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 is nothing more than statutory ‘window dressing’. It adds nothing at all of substance to the director’s traditional fiduciary duty of loyalty. It is also confusing and creates unnecessary uncertainty for directors with regard to their legal liability risk.”