This document contains an evaluation form for examining a student's research seminar presentation. It is divided into three sections that evaluate different aspects of the presentation. Section I contains student details. Section II evaluates the presentation quality based on attributes like appearance, use of visual aids, presentation skills, and response to questions. Section III evaluates the research quality based on attributes like originality, methodology, results, conclusions, and quality of communication. Examiners rank each attribute and provide scores that are totaled to evaluate the overall presentation and research quality.
This document contains an evaluation form for examining a student's research seminar presentation. It is divided into three sections that evaluate different aspects of the presentation. Section I contains student details. Section II evaluates the presentation quality based on attributes like appearance, use of visual aids, presentation skills, and response to questions. Section III evaluates the research quality based on attributes like originality, methodology, results, conclusions, and quality of communication. Examiners rank each attribute and provide scores that are totaled to evaluate the overall presentation and research quality.
This document contains an evaluation form for examining a student's research seminar presentation. It is divided into three sections that evaluate different aspects of the presentation. Section I contains student details. Section II evaluates the presentation quality based on attributes like appearance, use of visual aids, presentation skills, and response to questions. Section III evaluates the research quality based on attributes like originality, methodology, results, conclusions, and quality of communication. Examiners rank each attribute and provide scores that are totaled to evaluate the overall presentation and research quality.
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING, UNIVERSITY UYO, UYO, NIGERIA
RESEARCH SEMINAR (BLD781), SESSION: …………………………
EXAMINERS EVALUATION FORM
SECTION I: Student Details
Student’s Reg. No.:
Title:
SECTION II: Presentation Quality (40 MARKS)
Please tick ( √ ) accordingly to rank student’s performance based on the listed attributes Rank Definition: 1: Very poor; 2: Poor; 3: Average; 4: Good; 5: Excellent Attributes Rank (R) Score Max. Score(MS) 1 2 3 4 5 (R*MS)/5 40 Student’s Appearance: Physical appearance: 2 Neat and formally dressed Psychological appearance: 2 Excited, friendly, serious and confident PowerPoint Slide: Adequate blend among font size, font style, 6 font colour, background colour, slide transition, animation and slide aspect ratio Adherence to the 6X6 rule, but for practicability, 6 *One main point per slide *One thought per line *5 – 10 words per line *5 – 7 lines per slide Visibility and adequacy of figures, tables and 3 plates Presentation: Interaction with audience: focused on audience 4 and not visual aid Grammar 2 Knowledgeability of research topic 3 Presentation pace 2 Distribution of contents in slides 2 Response to Questions: Accuracy and adequacy of answer(s) 4 Short and direct answer(s) 2 Attitude when responding to question(s) 2 SECTION III: Research Quality (30 MARKS) Attributes Rank (R) Max. Score (MS) 1 2 3 4 5 (R*MS)/5 30 Originality: The study contains new and significant 2 information. Introduction: The study contains a highly compelling 5 rationale with very sound and highly rigorous hypotheses (if any) and perfectly coherent research objectives. Relationship to Literature: The study demonstrates an adequate 3 understanding of the relevant literature in the field and cites an appropriate range of literature sources. Methodology: The study's argument is built on an 4 appropriate base of theory, concepts, or other ideas. The methods employed are appropriate. Results and Discussion: Results are presented clearly and analysed 5 appropriately. Conclusion: Conclusions adequately tie together the other 2 elements of the study. Implications for research, practice and/or society The study identifies clearly, implications for 2 research, practice and/or society. The study bridges the gap between theory and practice. These implications are consistent with the findings and conclusions of the study. Quality of Communication: The study clearly expresses its case, measured 2 against the technical language of the field. Attention has been paid to the clarity of expression and readability. References: The style of referencing is adequate and 3 perfectly consistent. Publishable Quality: I would recommend this study for publication. 2