Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Impact of Climate Variability On Agricultural Growing Season A Review
Impact of Climate Variability On Agricultural Growing Season A Review
Impact of Climate Variability On Agricultural Growing Season A Review
al., 2014), and lowers production rate by agricultural history, for example, can result
varying the planting date, particularly for in reduced yields of conventional crops that
subsistent farmers (Ndomba, 2010). aren't fully developed due to reducing the
Climate models for a warming world, LGS. Depending on water availability,
according to Linderholm (2006), predict that increases in LGS may allow for earlier
rising CO2 levels in the atmosphere will planting, insuring maturity, and the chance
modify a range of climates, weather of many harvests (Linderholm, 2006). GS
patterns, and biological phenomena, such as variations are extremely sensitive to regional
the length of the growing season (LGS). As temperature anomalies, which can be
a result of an earlier start and later attributed to atmospheric teleconnection
conclusion of the growing season (GS), patterns (ATPs) (Irannezhad & Klve, 2015).
global air temperature rises may cause Knowing how long the GS will last and
changes in growth seasons in different parts when it will end aids in selecting the
of the world (Liu et al., 2016). In addition to appropriate cultivar in specific areas
spatiotemporal fluctuation of air (Moeletsi& Walker, 2012), resulting in
temperature, climatic conditions such as increased interest in many parts of the world
photoperiod, precipitation, continuous very (e.g., Cook & Vizy, 2012; Cui et al., 2017;
low air temperature, and wind may influence Ronchail et al., 2002; Sabziparvar &
the timing of the GS's start (SGS) and end Jahromi, 2018; Segele & Lamb, 2005). It is
(EGS) (Nagai et al., 2015). Furthermore, the an important factor in regulating the
data of the growing season can be maturity of cultivars grown under different
influenced by the amount of urban heat rainfall regimes (Akinseye et al., 2015;
island (US Environmental Protection Stewart, 1988). Changes in the length of the
Agency, 2016). growing season can have an impact on
In contrast, the variability of GS has an agricultural yield and pricing in both
impact on climate change. Variations in the positive and negative ways. Warming is
thermal growth season, as well as variations expected to reduce main agricultural yields
in albedo, according to Liu et al. (2016), can in general, but crops in particular locations
manage climate change by exchanging may benefit (IPCC, 2014).If the growing
carbon and water with the atmosphere. season is extended, farmers may be able to
Spatio-temporal variability at the beginning vary their crops or harvest many times from
(SGS) and end (EGS) of the growing season the same plot. It may, however, limit the
can influence meteorological processes and types of crops grown, encourage the growth
seasonal climate by influencing of foreign species or weeds, and increase the
evapotranspiration and physical properties requirement for irrigation. A prolonged
of the land surface such as latent and growing season, for example, could alter the
sensible heat, albedo, and aerodynamic functioning and structure of a region's
roughness (Polgar & Primack, 2011; ecosystems, affecting the range and types of
Schwartz et al., 2013). animal species in the area (US
The GS has a high degree of inter-annual Environmental Protection Agency, 2016).
fluctuation, with its parameters (start, end, Globally, the methodologies and definitions
and length) exhibiting the most significant used to establish the start and end of GS
shifts. The fluctuations are a valuable vary depending on the climate variable(s)
climatic indicator with a wide range of that determine the GS. Temperature-based
important climatological uses. Changes in GS definitions may be suitable in regions
>5 d > 50C (SI 3) 6-day spellwith 𝑇mean (Sabziparvar & Jahromi, 2018)
remaining above 50C
>5 d > 50C Fr (SI 6-day spell after the last (Liu et al., 2016; Walther &
5) 𝑇mean spring frost with Linderholm, 2006)
𝑇mean remaining above 50C
End of <5 d < 5 0C (EI 1) 4-day spell with 𝑇mean (Jones & Briffa, 1995)
growing remaining below 5 0C
season
=5 d < 50C (EI 2) 5-day spell with 𝑇mean (Carter, 1998)
remaining below 50C
>5 d > 50C | >5 d < Start (SI 3), end (EI 3) (Sabziparvar & Jahromi, 2018)
50C (LI 2)
=5 d > 50C Fr | 10 Start (SI 4), end (EI 4) (Walther & Linderholm, 2006)
d < 50C (LI 3)
>5 d > 50C Fr | 10 Start (SI 5), end (EI 4) (Linderholm et al., 2008; Liu et
d < 50C (LI 4) al., 2016)
=5 d > 50C Fr | Fr Start (SI 4), end (EI 5) (Jones et al., 2002)
OR = 5 d < 50C (LI
5)
>5 d > 50C Fr | Fr Start (SI 5), end (EI 6) (Walther & Linderholm, 2006)
OR > 5 d < 50C (LI
6)
Where i is a number ranging from January 1 This method can also be used to determine
to the day (d) to which the calculation the planting dates of individual crops. In
applies. The minimum and maximum values Brazin, for example, the start and conclusion
of the plot of C(d) versus days of the year of the growth season for soybean is
represent the climatological water season's established using
start (ds) and end (de), respectively. 𝒕
Each year, the beginning and cessation dates 𝑨(𝒕) = ∑(𝑹(𝒏) − 𝑹𝒓𝒆𝒇 )
are estimated independently by calculating 𝒏=𝟏
the daily cumulative rainfall anomaly on day where R(n) is rainfall for day n and Rref is a
D, A(D):
𝑫
reference rainfall value, both in mmday−1.
The value of Rref used was 2.5mm day−1,
𝑨(𝑫) = ̅)
∑ (𝑹𝒋 − 𝑸 representative of a soybean seedling's
𝒋=𝒅𝒔 −𝟓𝟎 needs(Abrahão & Costa, 2018).
Where Rj is the amount of rain on day j and j 3.4 Land surface phenology method:
varies from ds 50 to the day under An alternative approach to the estimation of
consideration (D). For each year, A(D) is LGP is the direct utilisation of multispectral
calculated for each day from d s- 50 to de + remote sensing data. This involves the
50. Because rainfall remains persistent in investigation of spatial patterns in vegetation
occurrence, duration, and intensity after the on the land surface as observed by satellite
minimum, the start date in A(D) is the day sensors. Vegetation indices collected from
after the minimum, and the end date is the optical sensors on board satellites provide
day after the maximum. information on the greening of vegetation
Dunning et al. (2016) extended this strategy throughout the year and its senescence. The
to areas with bimodal rainfall patterns by beginning, end, and duration of growing
employing the following formula: seasons can be derived from the time series
𝑫
using various methods (e.g., de Beurs &
𝑨(𝑫) = ̅)
∑ (𝑹𝒋 − 𝑸 Henbry (2010), White et al.
𝒋=𝒅𝒔𝟏−𝟐𝟎 (2009)).Different researchers employed
sensors and data sources such as the
Where Rj is the rainfall on day j and j ranges
Advanced Very High-Resolution
from ds1− 20 to the day being considered
Radiometer (AVHRR), SPOT
(D). A(D) is calculated for each day from
VEGETATION, Moderate Resolution
ds1− 20 to de1+ 20, and for each day from
Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and
ds2− 20 and de2+ 20, for each year.
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
Because the dry periods between successive
(NDVI) (example, Boschetti et al., 2009;
wet seasons may be shorter than 100 days,
Reed et al., 2009; Vrieling et al., 2013).
duration of 20 days (rather than the 50
The most widely used way to determine the
mentioned above) was employed to ensure
SGS and EGS is the variable threshold
the proper season was caught. For example,
method provided by White et al. (1997).It
the small dry season occurs just in July and
calculates the annual maximum and
August along West Africa's southern coast.
minimum NDVI per year and per pixel. The
The minima and maximum of A(D) were
average value of both is used to determine
used to calculate onset and cessation dates
the threshold. The SGS and EGS points are
once more.
when the NDVI profile surpasses the
threshold value in either an upward or combined with natural world indicators (e.g.
downward direction. poleward migration of temperature sensitive
fish, mammals and insects, etc.) provide
4 The relationship between climate unambiguous evidence for global warming.
variables and LGS and their trends The facts on the climate system tell us that
According to the Intergovernmental Panel the observed warming rate varies year on
on Climate Change, (IPCC (2007)), climate year, decade on decade, and place on place.
change is “clear and unambiguous” where Since 1900, the mean surface air
the global temperature increase is most temperature has increased by about 1 0C
pronounced at higher latitudes. A broad (0.80 0F) per decade (EPA, 2016). More
range of measurements (e.g., lower arctic than half of this increase has occurred since
Sea ice extent and rising ocean heat content) the mid-70s (Figure1, Wolff et al. 2020).
Figure 1: Annual global surface temperature (1850-2019) from UK Met Office Hadley Centre
(maroon), US National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Institute for Space
Studies (red), and US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Centers
(orange)(adapted from Wolff et al., 2020).
throughout the major mid-latitude regions of days increased from 35 to 38 percent and 27
the Northern Hemisphere during the second to 28 percent of extratropical land-area,
half of the twentieth century. Walther and respectively. The data glitch in South
Linderholm (2006) discovered that the America caused a significant drop in LGS
thermal growing season was extended by (Figure 2A).
roughly 20 days in the twentieth century in Cook and Vizy (2012) discovered that
the Greater Baltic Area (an earlier start of 12 growing season days (GSDs) had dropped
days and a later end of 8 days). From 1951 by up to 20% along the western Guinean
to 2007, the thermal growing season was coast, whereas GSDs have increased by 5-
extended by 2.3 days per decade in northern 10% in certain eastern locales in their
China and 1.3 days per decade in southern extensive study of Africa. Because of a
China, according to Song et al. (2010). thermal low in the Sahel, there will be more
According to Tomczyk and Szyga-Pluta summer rain and a 30% longer growth
(2019), during the study period, 1966-2015, season in the central and eastern Sahel, with
the growing season began earlier, while the shorter seasons in areas of the western
growing season ended later and later in Sahel. Increased mid-tropospheric moisture
Poland. Furthermore, Aalto et al. (2021) divergence in the boreal spring greatly
found that after controlling for the effects of shortens the rainy season in Tanzania and
other predictors, the used northness southern Kenya, whereas boreal spring
predictor (a proxy for incoming direct solar GSDs in Somalia and southern Ethiopia are
radiation) in Europe showed reasonable but eliminated by a northward shift of rainfall in
relatively weak effects for mean GS the eastern Sahel. Due to increased
conditions, with growing seasons beginning southwesterly moisture transfer from the
earlier (ca. 1.5 days) and GS lasting tropical Atlantic, increased rainfall in
approximately three days longer over January and February extends the growing
southern versus northern aspects. According season by 5–15 percent across central Africa
to Cornes et al. (2019), the thermal GS in (Congo basin).
Europe has increased at a pace of about 5 Severe (40-80%) reductions in austral spring
days every decade since 1965. Sabziparvar growing season days are associated with
and Jahromi (2018) discovered the most reduced precipitation and higher
significant changes in tGSS and tGSE of 9.6 evapotranspiration in subtropical southwest
(earlier start) and 10.8 (delay) days per Africa, particularly Angola and the southern
decade for northwest Iran between 1986 and Democratic Republic of the Congo (Cook
2005. Since 1895, the average length of the &Vizy, 2012). According to Tongwane and
growing season in the contiguous 48 states Moeletsi (2015), the start of the rainy season
has increased by around two weeks. LGS differs by four-seven weeks and the end of
has increased at a rate of around 2.2 days per the rainy season differs by one week, and
decade in the West, compared to nearly one the average coefficient of variation of
day per decade in the East (EPA, 2016). seasonal rainfall is 39% between 1950 and
Mueller et al. (2015) depicted global LGS 1999 at Butha-Buthe in Lesotho. The
trends from 1956 to 2005 (Figure 2). They frequency and duration of dry periods within
concluded that the majority of the world's a season, according to Segele and Lamb
land mass has a longer growing seasonOver (2005), have a substantial impact on the
the last 50 years, the size of regions with length and quality of the Kiremt growing
growing seasons longer than 250 or 300 season in Ethiopia. Several dry-spell
researchrevealed that 3-5 days without rain a temporal lag of at least seven days in Mali
are very common across most of the Kiremt between the mean onset date and traditional
region, with extended intervals of more than farmer sowing dates for crops. These
10 days only occurring in the lowlands of variances in growing season have an impact
extreme western and northeastern Ethiopia, on farmers' production as well as their
where rainfall variability is high. Akinseye energy and resources, particularly
et al. (2015) hypothesised that there is subsistence farmers.
Figure 2: Global trend (significant at the 5%-level)ofLGS 1956–2005 in observations (A) and
CMIP5(Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Model 5)-simulations under ALL forcing (B), GHG
(greenhouse gas) forcing (C) and NAT (changes in natural) forcing (D)(Adapted from Mueller et al.,
2015).
High elevations, near water bodies, and remained smaller near lakes and the sea, as
areas with substantial forest cover have less well as in areas with extensive forest cover,
year-to-year variance in GS factors, but this indicating mechanisms associated with
variability is predicted to increase as urban latent and sensible heat transfer, as well as
land use grows. GS features (start, finish, radiation interception, which can have
length, and rising degree days sum (GDDs)) implications for local temperature buffering
vary significantly across Northern Europe. (Aalto et al., 2021 and De Frenne et al.,
Local topography, proximity to bodies of 2021).
water, forest cover, and urban land use were The variability of GS, on the other hand, has
all influenced by such variation, which was an impact on climate change. According to
primarily dominated by latitudinal and Polgar and Primack (2011) and Schwartz et
elevational gradients (Aalto et al., 2021). al. (2013), spatio-temporal variability at the
Temporal fluctuations in GS variables have beginning (SGS) and end (EGS) of the
growing season can affect meteorological temperatures are already close to or at the
processes and seasonal climate by optimal range for crop development. A
influencing evapotranspiration and physical surge in potential evapotranspiration would
properties of the land surface such as latent exacerbate drought stress, particularly in the
and sensible heat, albedo, and aerodynamic semiarid tropics and subtropics.
roughness. According to Polgar and Primack Because air temperatures, frost days, and
(2011), spatiotemporal differences in the rainfall are all affected by climate, climate
leafy phase may alter biogeochemical change may cause these growth season
activities such as CO2 uptake by variables to fluctuate. Global air temperature
photosynthesis and the emission of biogenic rises may induce adjustments in the growing
volatile organic compounds. It may also season by changing the start and end dates.
cause phenological mismatch between plants Aside from spatiotemporal fluctuations in
and their animal pollinators and eaters, air temperature, environmental variables
which increases the risk of biodiversity loss such as photoperiod, precipitation,
(Amano et al., 2010; Polgar&Primack, persistently very low air temperature, and
2011). Variations in the thermal growth wind may impact the start (SGS) and end
season, according to Liu et al. (2016), can (EGS) times of the GS. Climate change, on
regulate climate change by exchanging the other hand, is influenced by GS
carbon and water with the atmosphere and variability. By exchanging carbon and water
modifying albedo. with the environment, changes in the
thermal growth season and albedo can assist
5 Conclusion: to moderate climate change. Spatio-temporal
Climate change is undeniable. It caused variability at the start (SGS) and end (EGS)
changes in the intensity, amount, and of the growing season can change
patterns of meteorological and climate evapotranspiration and land surface physical
variables like as temperature and rainfall. It attributes such as latent and sensible heat,
is projected to result in long-term shortages albedo, and aerodynamic roughness, hence
of water and other resources, deteriorating altering meteorological processes and
soil conditions, drought and desertification, seasonal climate.
and production reduction (by shortening the Determining the beginning and end of the
growing season). Climate change, on the growth season can be challenging since
other hand, may benefit temperate regions there are different definitions of the
greatly. Because crops require enough beginning and end of the growing season
warmth and precipitation to flourish, based on the climatic variable that the area is
changes in the amount and pattern of these limited of. Temperature-based definitions of
parameters affect production. Climate growing season are primarily used in places
change has distinct effects in different parts with limited temperature, such as mid- and
of the world. Increased temperatures in the high-latitude zones. Tropical, semi-arid, and
middle and upper latitudes will lengthen arid areas utilised a rainfall- and
growing seasons and expand crop-producing evapotranspiration-based definition for
areas poleward, benefiting countries in these growing season, whereas locations where
regions. Higher temperatures, on the other rainfall is the determining factor used a
hand, are expected to have a detrimental rainfall- and evapotranspiration-based
impact on growth conditions in lower definition. However, when it comes to
latitudes, particularly in areas where predicting the start and end dates of rainfall
prospects for the future. Agricultural and Indices for the Northern China during
Food Science in Finland,7(2),161–179. 1961-2015. Advances in Meteorology.
https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.72857 https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6718729
11. Chakraborty, S., Pattanayak, A., Mandal, 18. de Beurs, K.M.; Henebry, G.M. (2005).
S., Das, M., & Roychowdhury, R. Land surface phenology and temperature
(2014). An Overview of Climate variation in the International Geosphere-
Change: Causes, Trends and Biosphere Program high-latitude
Implications. Research Gate, 2–29. transects. Global Change Biol.11, 779–
https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4174.5600 790.
12. Chaponniere, A., & Smakhtin, V. 19. de Beurs, K.M.; Henebry, G.M. (2010).
(2006). A Review of Climate Change Spatio-Temporal Statistical Methods for
Scenarios and Preliminary Rainfall Modeling Land Surface Phenology. In
Trend Analysis in the Oum Er Rbia Phenological Research: Methods for
Basin , Morocco. Working Paper 110 Environmental and Climate Change
(Drought Series: Paper 8) Colombo, Sri Analysis; Hudson, I.L., Keatley, M.R.,
Lanka: International Water Management Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The
Institute (IWMI). Netherlands, 177–208.
13. Coffel, E. D., Keith, B., Lesk, C., 20. De Frenne, P., Lenoir, J., Luoto, M.,
Horton, R. M., Bower, E., Lee, J., & Scheffers, B. R., Zellweger, F., Aalto, J.,
Mankin, J. S. (2019). Future Hot and Ashcroft, M. B., Christiansen, D. M.,
Dry Years Worsen Nile Basin Water Decocq, G., De Pauw, K., Govaert, S.,
Scarcity Despite Projected Precipitation Greiser, C., Gril, E., Hampe, A., Jucker,
Increases. Earth’s Future, 7(8), 967–977. T., Klinges, D. H., Koelemeijer, I. A.,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001247 Lembrechts, J. J., Marrec, R., …
14. Cook, K. H., & Vizy, E. K. (2012). Hylander, K. (2021). Forest
Impact of climate change on mid- microclimates and climate change:
twenty-first century growing seasons in Importance, drivers and future research
Africa. Climate Dynamics, 39, 2937– agenda. Global Change Biology, 27,
2955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382- 2279–2297.
012-1324-1 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15569
15. Cornes, R. C., van der Schrier, G., & 21. Dore, M. H. I. (2005). Climate change
Squintu, A. A. (2019). A reappraisal of and changes in global precipitation
the thermal growing season length patterns : What do we know ?
across Europe. International Journal of Environment International, 31, 1167–
Climatology, 39(3), 1787–1795. 1181.
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5913 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2005.03.
16. Cui, L., & Shi, J. (2021). Evaluation and 004
comparison of growing season metrics in 22. Dunning, C. M., Black, E., & Allan, R.
arid and semi-arid areas of northern P. (2018). Later Wet Seasons with More
China under climate change. Ecological Intense Rainfall over Africa under
Indicators, 121(January 2020), 107055. Future Climate Change. JOURNAL OF
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.10 CLIMATE, 31, 9719–9738.
7055 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-
17. Cui, L., Shi, J., & Ma, Y. (2017). A 0102.1
Comparison of Thermal Growing Season
Allured, D., Leroux, S., & Funk, C. Lengthening of the growing season in
(2012). Seasonality of African wheat and maize producing regions.
Precipitation from 1996 to 2009. Weather and Climate Extremes, 9, 47–
JOURNAL OF CL IMATE, 25, 4304– 56.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2015.0
4322. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D- 4.001
11-00157.1 44. Mugalavai, E. M., Kipkorir, E. C., Raes,
37. Liebmann, B., & Marengo, J. A. (2001). D., & Rao, M. S. (2008). Analysis of
Interannual Variability of the Rainy rainfall onset , cessation and length of
Season and Rainfall in the Brazilian growing season for western Kenya.
Amazon Basin. JOURNAL OF CL Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,
IMATE, 14, 4308–4318. 148,11231135.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.a
38. Linderholm, H. W. (2006). Growing grformet. 2008.02.013
season changes in the last century. 45. Nagai, S., Saitoh, T. M., Nasahara, K.
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, N., & Suzuki, R. (2015). Spatio-
137,114.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrfor temporal distribution of the timing of
met. 2006.03.006 start and end of growing season along
39. Linderholm, H. W., Walther, A., & vertical and horizontal gradients in
Chen, D. (2008). Twentieth-century Japan. International Journal of
trends in the thermal growing season in Biometeorology,59(1),4754.https://doi.o
the Greater Baltic Area. Climatic rg/10.1007/ s00484-014-0822-8
Change,87(34),405419.https://doi.org/10 46. Ndomba, P. M. (2010). Development of
.1007/ s10584-007-9327-3 Rainfall Curves for Crops Planting
40. Liu, X., Zhu, X., Pan, Y., Zhu, W., Dates: A Case Study of Pangani River
Zhang, J., & Zhang, D. (2016). Thermal Basin in Tanzania. Nile Basin Water
growing season and response of alpine Science & Engineering Journal, 3, 13–
grassland to climate variability across 27.
the Three-Rivers Headwater Region, 47. Odekunle, T O. (2004). RAINFALL
China. Agricultural and Forest AND THE LENGTH OF THE
Meteorology,220,3037.https://doi.org/10 GROWING SEASON IN NIGERIA.
.1016 /j.agrformet.2016.01.015 International Journal of Climatology, 24,
41. Lupi Edao, A., Kibert, K., & Mamo, G. 467–479.https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.
(2018). Analysis of Start, End and 1012
Length of the Growing Season and 48. Odekunle, Theophilus Odeyemi. (2006).
Number of Rainy Days in Semi-Arid Determining rainy season onset and
Central Refit Valley of Oromia State, retreat over Nigeria from precipitation
Ethiopia. Advances in Crop Science and amount and number of rainy days.
Technology,06(04).https://doi.org/10.41 Theoretical and Applied Climatology,
72/2329-8863.1000386 83(May),193201.https://doi.org/10.1007/
42. Moeletsi, M. E., & Walker, S. (2012). s00704- 005-0166-8
Rainy season characteristics of the Free 49. Omotosho, J. B., Balogun, A. A., &
State Province of South Africa with Ogunjobi, K. (2000). PREDICTING
reference to rain-fed maize production. MONTHLY AND SEASONAL
Water SA, 38(5), 775–782. RAINFALL , ONSET AND
43. Mueller, B., Hauser, M., Iles, C., Rimi, CESSATION OF THE RAINY
R. H., Zwiers, F. W., & Wan, H. (2015). SEASON IN WEST AFRICA USING.
Fourth Assess- ment Report of the Geophysical Research Letters, 31, 1–4.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018624
Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri, 99. Kurukulasuriya, P., & Rosenthal, S.
R.K and Reisinger, A. (eds.)]. IPCC, (2003). Climate change and agriculture.
Geneva, Switzerland,. Environment Department Papers;No. 91.
93. IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Climate Change Series. World Bank,
Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Washington, DC. © World Bank.
In Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. https://doi.org/https://openknowledge.wo
Contribution of Working Group II to the rldbank.org/handle/10986/16616
Fifth Assessment Report of the License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.”
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate 100. Liebmann, B., Blade, I., Kiladis, G.
Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. N., Carvalho, L. M. V, Senay, G. B.,
Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, Allured, D., Leroux, S., & Funk, C.
T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi,. (2012). Seasonality of African
papers2://publication/uuid/B8BF5043- Precipitation from 1996 to 2009.
C873-4AFD-97F9-A630782E590D JOURNAL OF CL IMATE, 25, 4304–
94. Irannezhad, M., & Kløve, B. (2015). Do 4322. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-
atmospheric teleconnection patterns 11-00157.1
explain variations and trends in thermal 101. Liebmann, B., & Marengo, J. A.
growing season parameters in Finland? (2001). Interannual Variability of the
International Journal of Climatology, Rainy Season and Rainfall in the
35(15), 4619–4630. Brazilian Amazon Basin. JOURNAL OF
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4311 CL IMATE, 14, 4308–4318.
95. Jones, P. D., & Briffa, K. R. (1995). 102. Linderholm, H. W. (2006). Growing
Growing season temperatures over the season changes in the last century.
former Soviet Union. International Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,
Journal of Climatology, 15, 943–959. 137,1–14.https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3370150902 agrformet.2006.03.006
96. Jones, P. D., & Lister, D. H. (2002). The 103. Linderholm, H. W., Walther, A., &
Daily Temperature Record For St. Chen, D. (2008). Twentieth-century
Petersburg (1743–1996). Climate trends in the thermal growing season in
Change,53,253–267.https://doi.org/DOI: the Greater Baltic Area. Climatic
10.1023/A:1014918808741 Change,87(3–4),405–419.https://doi.org/
97. Jones, Philip D., Briffa, K. R., Osborn, 10.1007/s10584-007-9327-3
T. J., Moberg, A., & Bergström, H. 104. Liu, X., Zhu, X., Pan, Y., Zhu, W.,
(2002). Relationships between Zhang, J., & Zhang, D. (2016). Thermal
circulation strength and the variability of growing season and response of alpine
growing-season and cold-season climate grassland to climate variability across
in northern and central Europe. The the Three-Rivers Headwater Region,
Holocene,12(6),643–656.https://doi.org/ China. Agricultural and Forest
10.1191/0959683602hl577rp Meteorology, 220, 30–37.
98. Kunkel, K. E., Easterling, D. R., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.
Hubbard, K., & Redmond, K. (2004). 01.015
Temporal variations in frost-free season 105. Lupi Edao, A., Kibert, K., & Mamo,
in the United States : 1895–2000. G. (2018). Analysis of Start, End and
Equatorial Pacific and the Tropical during the maize growing season in the
Atlantic Ocean. International Journal of northern lowlands of Lesotho.
Climatology, 22, 1663–1686. Theoretical and Applied Climatology,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.815 120,575–585.https://doi.org/10. 1007/
120. Sabziparvar, A. A., & Jahromi, F. K. s00704-014-1183-2
(2018). Analysis of changes in thermal 127. UNFCCC. (2011). Fact sheet:
growing season indices (tGSI) and their Climate change science - the status of
relations with some selected atmospheric climate change science today. 1–7.
teleconnection patterns (ATPs) over the 128. UNFCCC. (2017). UN Climate
northwest of Iran. Environmental Change Annual Report 2017. In NTT
Monitoring and Assessment, Springer Docomo (Vol. 21, Issue 5).
Nature,190,142.https://doi.org/10.1007/s file:///C:/Users/green/Downloads/Yemen
10661-018-6519-4 HC Annual report 2017.pdf
121. Schwartz, M. D., Hanes, J. M., & 129. US Environmental Protection
Liang, L. (2013). Comparing carbon flux Agency.(2016).Tecchnical
and high-resolution spring phenological Documentation: Length of Growing
measurements in a northern mixed Season.
forest. Agricultural and Forest https://archive.org/details/growing-
Meteorology,169,136–147.https:// season_documen.
doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.10.014 130. Vrieling A., J. de Leeuw and M. Y.
122. Segele, Z. T., & Lamb, P. J. (2005). Said (2013). Length of Growing Period
Characterization and variability of over Africa: Variability and Trends from
Kiremt rainy season over Ethiopia. 30 Years of NDVI Time Series. Remote
Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, Sens.5, 982-1000;
89, 153–180. doi:10.3390/rs5020982
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-005- 131. Walther, A., & Linderholm, H. W.
0127-x (2006). A comparison of growing season
123. Song, Y., Linderholm, H. W., indices for the Greater Baltic Area.
Chenb, D., & Waltherb, A. (2010). International Journal of Biometeorology,
Trends of the thermal growing season in 51(2),107–118.https://doi.org/10.1007
China, 1951–2007. International Journal /s00484-006-0048-5
of Climatology, 30, 33–43. 132. White, M.A.; de Beurs, K.M.; Didan,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc K.; Inouye, D.W.; Richardson, A.D.;
124. Stewart, J. I. (1988). Response Jensen, O.P.; O’Keefe, J.; Zhang, G.;
farming in rainfed agriculture. Nemani, R.R.; van Leeuwen, W.J.D.; et
125. Tomczyk, A. M., & Szyga-Pluta, K. al. (2009) Intercomparison,
(2019). Variability of thermal and interpretation, and assessment of spring
precipitation conditions in the growing phenology in North America estimated
season in Poland in the years 1966– from remote sensing for 1982–2006.
2015. Theoretical and Applied Global Change Biol. 15, 2335–2359.
Climatology, 135, 1517–1530. 133. White, M.A.; Thornton, P.E.;
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018- Running, S.W. (1997). A continental
2450-4 phenology model for monitoring
126. Tongwane, M. I., & Moeletsi, M. E. vegetation responses to interannual
(2015). Intra-seasonal rainfall variability