The PTB Simulation Report

User: Nirar
User Email: nirar1997@gmail.com
Total Score: 97/100
Duration Score: 31/34
Cost Score: 33/33
Scope Score: 33/33
Scenario: NPD-A
Created at: Tuesday, July 11, 2023 10:46:47 PM
Last simulation run result: Scenario finished
Simulation Time: 24
Target Date: 22
Target Cost: 36000
Simulation Cash: 3200
Total Cost: 32800
Value: 100
Estimated Cost: 32800
Estimated Duration: 24
Morale: Very Low
 The PTB Simulation Report

Question: What did you learn from running the simulation?

Answer: We have learnt that the decision will depend on the expenses, as we can either
use our own team or outsource the work. The most important aspect is to learn how to
manage the quality, resources including cost and duration as those are the factors that
might effect the project.
 The PTB Simulation Report

Question: In case you worked on this project in a team, how did you distribute the
management of the project between the team members?

Answer: We equally distributed our work so that no one gets to over work nor under work
and be fair on taking responsibilities. For instance overseeing schedule and resources
 The PTB Simulation Report

Question: What did you find most useful or enjoyable?

Answer: This just makes our lives easy by getting to understand how to simulate and we
are enjoying doing this simulation.
 The PTB Simulation Report

Question: Please enter any comments and recommendations:

Answer: NA
 The PTB Simulation Report

Scenario Information:
Project Name Number of Target Date Initial Cash Bonus per Day Penalty per Day
Tasks

Project1 7 22 36000 100 50

Resource Information:
Name Availa Availa Cost/ Idle Firing Hiring Show Firing Hiring Minim Maxim
ble ble Day Cost/ Cost Cost Up Lead Lead um um
Units Units Day Proba Time Time Units Units
in bility
Lead (%)
Time

Engin 3 3 500 200 100 100 100 1 1 2 5

eers

Quality Requirements:
 The PTB Simulation Report

Name Formula Importanc Minimum Desired Maximum Best Mode Evaluation

e Value Value Value

Signal [HDQ]*[SD 10 0 70 100 Maximum 74.66

Strength Q]*[HMQ]
*[SCQ]*[I
Q]*100

Task Information:
 The PTB Simulation Report

Project Task Name Cost of Actual Actual Income Current Selected

Name Split Start Finish Status Mode

Project1 Hardware 0 0 7 0 Finished Subcontrac

Design tor

Mode Name Optimistic Most Likely Pessimistic Fixed Cost Engineers Hardware
Duration Duration Duration Needed Design
Quality
[HDQ] (HDQ)

In-House 5 5 5 0 2 0.95

Subcontracto 6 6 6 0 0 0.9
r
 The PTB Simulation Report

Project Task Name Cost of Actual Actual Income Current Selected

Name Split Start Finish Status Mode

Project1 Software 0 4 7 0 Finished In-House

Design

Mode Name Optimistic Most Likely Pessimistic Fixed Cost Engineers Software
Duration Duration Duration Needed Design
Quality
[SDQ] (SDQ)

In-House 2 2 2 0 3 0.98

Subcontracto 3 3 3 0 3 0.95
r
 The PTB Simulation Report

Project Task Name Cost of Actual Actual Income Current Selected

Name Split Start Finish Status Mode

Project1 Logistics 0 0 8 0 Finished In-House

Mode Name Optimistic Most Likely Pessimistic Fixed Cost Engineers

Duration Duration Duration Needed

In-House 6 6 6 0 2
 The PTB Simulation Report

Project Task Name Cost of Actual Actual Income Current Selected

Name Split Start Finish Status Mode

Project1 Hardware 0 7 15 0 Finished In-House

Manufactu
ring

Mode Name Optimistic Most Likely Pessimistic Fixed Cost Engineers Hardware
Duration Duration Duration Needed Manufacturin
g Quality
[HMQ]
(HMQ)

In-House 7 7 7 0 1 0.99

Subcontracto 8 8 8 0 0 0.9
r
 The PTB Simulation Report

Project Task Name Cost of Actual Actual Income Current Selected

Name Split Start Finish Status Mode

Project1 Software 0 7 15 0 Finished Subcontrac

Coding tor

Mode Name Optimistic Most Likely Pessimistic Fixed Cost Engineers Software
Duration Duration Duration Needed Coding
Quality
[SCQ] (SCQ)

In-House 6 6 6 0 2 0.99

Subcontracto 7 7 7 0 0 0.9
r
 The PTB Simulation Report

Project Task Name Cost of Actual Actual Income Current Selected

Name Split Start Finish Status Mode

Project1 Integratio 0 15 18 0 Finished In-House

n

Mode Name Optimistic Most Likely Pessimistic Fixed Cost Engineers Integration
Duration Duration Duration Needed Quality [IQ]
(IQ)

In-House 3 3 3 0 3 0.95

Subcontracto 4 4 4 0 0 0.8
r
 The PTB Simulation Report

Project Task Name Cost of Actual Actual Income Current Selected

Name Split Start Finish Status Mode

Project1 Testing 0 18 24 0 Finished In-House

and
Commissio
ning

Mode Name Optimistic Most Likely Pessimistic Fixed Cost Engineers

Duration Duration Duration Needed

In-House 5 5 5 0 1