Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ann Sullivan
Ann Sullivan
How we read, how we spell and build words are just two examples. And we need to be consistent in the
way the materials are presented, but also in the dialogue or the pattern that is associated with the task.
And of course, our language is simple and easy for our learners to understand. In terms of timing, pupils
should work through the program at a pace that's appropriate for their individual needs. And this needs to
be something that's easy for teachers to manage. Pupils should have access to daily teaching sessions,
of course, and those sessions should focus on reading and spelling in Phonics for Sen, just as in Sounds-
Write, reading and spelling are taught in tandem. And the phonic approach should be embedded across
the curriculum. And it's beneficial for all of our staff to be trained in at least basic phonics so that they're
confident to use this approach in any and all subjects. If a child needs assistance to read a word or to
spell a word in mainstream schools during initial instruction, the expectation is that children will complete
their phonics within two or three years. And this won't be the case for children with SEM.
So I hope you enjoy those. And for more information, please either go to my Phonics for Sen website or
the Discover Inclusion website. So, finally, I just hope you found this interesting and useful and you've
gained some snippets about how we can make Phonics accessible for learners with complex needs. Here
are my contacts. Do go and visit my website if you would like to any more information, but mostly keep in
touch with me on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram. Many thanks.
I think your first port of call is how can I make what I'm already doing accessible? But if the child is not
able to keep up, even if they're involved in keep up sessions, then you would be looking towards, shall I
be doing a specialist program? And of course, upon expression is one. There aren't many others around,
but there are others. I have to be fair on that. And I think one of the things that worries schools,
particularly in England, maybe not in other parts of the UK, is this idea of fidelity to a program. And what
are ofsted going to say if they come in and they see that we're running Sounds-Write for our mainstream
learners and they're doing fantastic. And then we've got a child who's doing something different and
perhaps outside the classroom and perhaps in a quiet, distraction free environment, because that's what
the child needs. It's an interesting question. I have had lots of conversations with the DfE about this
because this is a problem for mainstream schools and they seem to be suggesting that they are switching
their message to fidelity to an approach rather than fidelity to a program, which is music to my ears
because especially in Sounds-Write schools, it would fit in beautifully.
I do so wish that I had a wonderful snappy answer for this, but I haven't. The nearest I can come to it is
we need to be aware that if we are taking decisions about, well, they've been on Phonics for three years,
which is the same as their peers, and their peers are all doing it, so these children are not able to do it,
therefore, Phonics hasn't worked. We need to take a step back and we need to look how far into their
Phonics program they are. And when we do that, what becomes very clear, it's not that Phonics hasn't
worked, it's that Phonics isn't finished yet. Those children are being pulled out of it at a point where their
learners still had access to it. So, we need to be firm, we need to be consistent, we need to have the
courage of our convictions and we need to carry on for those children. And those conversations that I'm
sure you're thinking in your head about the mainstream children, those conversations are happening in
special too, because for some of the really complex learners, we're talking six or seven years on a
Phonics program.
[00:41:16.090] - Ann Sullivan
And that's just the time it takes so we can't misinterpret the situation and.