Comments on the drawings received.

S. Comments by Reply/Compliance Comments by Reply/Compliance Comments by Reply/Compliance Comments by Reply/Compliance

No. Authority by contractor. Authority by contractor. Authority by contractor.    Authority by contractor.   
Engineer. On 19th feb,2020 Engineer. On 20th April,2020 Engineer. On On 21th May,2020 Engineer. On 01st On 23rd June
On 11th On 12th 27th June,2020 ,2020
feb,2020 March,2020 April,2020

SVUP
GENERAL
1. Please submit Noted and same Comments on
the design shall be design booklet
booklet for incorporated. are mentioned
SVUP. below against
point no 15 to
20

2. Please submit Noted and same Found in Noted

the STAAD shall be order.
model. incorporated.
3. Please submit The same has been Geotechnical Out of 19 SVUPs Noted. Please Noted.
the geotechnical submitted earlier reports of these 5 SVUPs submit
investigation by Letter no.0185 following geotech reports are remaining
report. dated 02nd SVUPs are not pending. However, geotechnical
february, 2020. submitted. due to some report in
Please submit emergency future for our
these reports- condition in the record.
124+208 country it is not
124+738 feasible to submit
 141+795 the geotech reports
143+108 as of now. Since,
149+109 the desired SBC is
of order 10T/m²
the same is easily
achievable. Also
note no- 10 has
been added in the
GAD to ensure SBC
before construction
the reports will
submitted as soon
as possible.
4. It is noted that, Noted and the Found in Noted
right return wall same has been order.
is proposed at revised. Revised
median side drawings have
with side slope been attached here
of earthworks. with.
Low height
boundary wall is
proposed across
the median.
This proposal
will require
effective
drainage for
storm water
near boundary
wall and slope
 protection to
avoid erosion.
Also, it might
provide access
road to
expressway.
Therefore, it is
recommended
to provide
Retaining/RE
wall across the
median up to
FRL. Also,
concrete barrier
shall be
provided on
Retaining /RE
wall to protect
errant vehicle at
median.
5. Thrie beam Noted and same Found in Noted
steel barrier has been revised. order.
should be
shown in
continuation
with concrete
crash barrier on
outer sides of
carriage way &
as per clause
 no.10.7.2(b)of
IRC- SP-99-
2013 ,median
barrier Should
be shown in the
continuation
with concrete
crash barrier on
median side.
However, same
is not shown in
the drawing .
Please check
&amend.
6. Provision to Noted and has Found in Noted
drain off the been provided in order.
water from the drawings as
expressway down take runner
carriage way is pipe.
not shown in   
the
drawing .Please
check and
amend.
7. It is observed The same has been Found in Noted
from submitting confirmed from order.
drawing, that site. A note has
founding level been added in
of raft is kept at drawing regarded
natural ground this.
 level. Top soil of
natural ground
level may be
susceptible to
settlement &
erosion .Therefo
re, please
ensure that ,the
design SBC is
achieved before
laying of PCC.
8. Sequence of The same has been Found in Noted
earth filling revised as note no- order.
behind the side 13 and 14.
walls shall be
accounted in
design & note
related to same
should be
mentioned in
the drawing.
Please amend.
SVUP at
Ch.124+738
9. As per latest Noted and same Found in Noted
plan & profile has been revised. order.
drawing, highest
natural ground
level is
242.545m.
 However,as per
submitted
Drawing ,foundi
ng level of raft is
242.850 which
is 305mm above
NGL. This seems
to be incorrect.
Please check &
amend .
SVUP at
CH.127+040
10.    As per latest Noted and same Found in Noted
plan & profile has been revised. order.
drawing , FRL at
this chainage is
252.387m.
However, FRL   
mentioned in
drawing is
252.345m which
is not matching
with plan &
profile drawing.
Please checK &
amend.
SVUP at
Ch.127+695

11. As per latest Noted and same Found in Noted

 plan & profile has been revised. order.
drawing, FRL at
this chainage is
254+972m.
However , FRL
mentioned in
drawings is
254.935m which
is not matching
with plan and
profile drawing.
Please check &
amend.
SVUP AT
CH.128+200
12. As per latest Noted and same Found in Noted
plan & profile has been revised. order.
drawing, FRL at
this chainage is
257+826m.
However, FRL
mentioned in
drawing is
257.795m which
is not matching
with plan &
profile drawing.
Please check &
amend.
SVUP AT
 CH.138+619

13. As per latest Noted and same Found in Noted

plan & profile has been revised. order.
drawing, highest
natural ground
level is
260.509m.
However, as per
submitted
drawing,
founding level
of raft is
260.650 which
is 141 NGL. This
seems to be
incorrect .
Please check &
amend.
SVUP at
Ch.143+108
14. As per plan & Noted and same Found in Noted
profile drawing, has been revised. order.
average highest
natural ground
level is
264.165m.
however, as per
submitted
drawing ,
 founding level
of raft is
264.270 which
is 105mm above
NGL. THIS
seems to be
incorrect. Please
check & amend.
15. - - Load factors of Noted and ULS load Found in Noted
thermal loads factor for thermal order.
shall be taken load has been
as for leading added. However, it
case and is not governing
accompanying therefore, there is
case as per no change in
table B.2 of section and
annexure B of reinforcement.
IRC 6-2017.
16. - - Please add Noted and the Found in Noted
note-“construc same is added as order.
tion of joints note no-4
shall be
provided as
per section
1709 of
MoRTH
specifications.
“in all
drawings.
17. - - SPV loading is Noted and Found in Noted
not considered complied. However order.
in the design , it is not governing
of the therefore, there is
structure. no change in the
section and
reinforcement.

18. - - Load Same load Found in Noted

combination combinations are order.
to check shear considered to
strength check to both shear
should be strength & moment
same as load strength. Shear
combinations force due to
to check variable loads are
moment considered in
strength. design.
Shear force
due to variable
loads are not
considered in
design. Please
check.
19. - - Kindly The same is already Found in Noted
incorporate considered in order.
effect of creep design. The
while calculation is done
calculating on page no 49 of
stress in pdf attached here
 concrete and with.
steel in rare
combination
and quasi-
permanent
combination.
20. - - Kindly As per Clause no- Kindly Noted and the Found in order. Noted.
incorporate 7.2 on page no 90 incorporate same is found in
deflections of IRC-6 deflections deflection order. The file is
under under frequent calculations attached with for
frequent combinations are under reference.
combinations considered for PSC frequent
of load. structures. combinations
of load as per
clause
121.4.1(2) of
IRC 112-2011
to be read
with
amendment
no.9 published
vide
notification
no.34.
21. - - - - As per our We have provided Design speed for Noted and the
earlier thrie beam crash expressway is 120 revised drawings
comment and barrier on the km/hr. Provision are attached here
your median edge of the of thrie beam with.
compliance, road in approach crash barrier on
RE wall was and there is no the median edge
 agreed to be possibility of of the road in
provided vehicle to enter on approach will be
across the the RE-wall side. inadequate to
median up to prevent errant
FRL. Also, vehicles falling
concrete into median.
barrier shall Moreover,
be provided median is wide
on this RE wall and there will be
to protect presence of
errant vehicle people at this
at median. location for
This shall be maintenance of
shown in the median drains
section A-A of and median
the drawings. plantation.
Concrete barriers
are essential for
their safety.
22. - - - - Please submit Noted and same is Noted. Noted.
reinforcement attached here with.
drawings so as
to review and
approve
design
document.