MFE004

International Journal of xxxxxx
Vol. x, No. x, (20xx), pp. xx-xx
Study On Machinability Issues of Hard to Machining Inconel 718

- A Review
Kishor K Powar1, Anupama N Kallol2, Shivkumar S2, Manjunath G A2, Nikhil R3*
1
Research Scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KLS Gogte Institute
of Technology, Belagavi, 590008, India
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, K. L. S. Gogte Institute of Technology,
Belagavi, 590008, India
3*
School of Mechanical Engineering, Reva University, Bengaluru, 560064, India
kishor.powar5570@gmail.com , ankallol@git.edu , sshivakumar@git.edu ,

manjunathga@git.edu
nikhil.rangaswamy@reva.edu.in
Corresponding author: nikhil.rangaswamy@reva.edu.in
Abstract
Especially in the aerospace and automobile industries, recently growing demand for
tough and heat resistance materials. On the other hand, processing these materials is
often difficult due to their mechanical properties, which include strong wear resistance,
abrasion resistance, and low heat conductivity. Short tool lifetimes are the result, along
with high cutting temperatures and forces. Variations in machinability may be brought on
by changes in material microstructures brought on by changes in chemical composition,
forging methods, casting, and heat treatment. Because of their remarkable greater
efficiency and effectiveness, Inconel 718 nickel superalloys are employed in numerous
automotive, marine, and aviation applications. In contrast, Inconel 718's poor thermal
conductivity and quick strain hardening made fabrication difficult and compromised the
surface's machining ability. This paper studies Inconel 718 machining problems.
Keywords: Inconel 718, Microstructure, Machinability, Tool wear
1. Introduction
Having an alloy proportion of more than 4%, high-alloy cast irons fall under this
category of materials. Low-alloy cast iron, which has a Brinell hardness range of 350–
550, is defined as cast iron that has less than 4% alloy (HB). Comparing high alloy cast
iron (450-850 HB) with unalloyed or Cast iron with low or moderate levels of alloy has
significantly higher wear resistance, heat resistance, and corrosion resistance. [1-5] Nickel,
ISSN: XXXX-XXXX IJXX 1

Copyright ⓒ XXXX SERSC
vanadium, molybdenum, chromium, and copper are the most commonly used cast iron
having high alloy. Based on the amount of alloy in these materials, they are given the
labels Ni-Hard, Cr-Hard, and so forth. With a Rockwell C (HRC) hardness range of 58–
65 and wear resistance, Ni-Hard is high-alloy white cast iron [1-5,54].
Exceptional A maximum of 1% cobalt and 50–55% nickel + cobalt, along with 17–21%
chromium, are present in the alloy.[6-11] The result of these two factors is the material's
resistance to corrosion. Most commonly employed in aerospace applications, it is a
nickel-based alloy with heat resistance and exceptional strength. With the alloy's
extraordinary hardness and work-hardening properties. [12-26] Inconel 718 machining is
becoming more and more difficult. Investigation on the machinability of Inconel 718 by
some researchers study effects of cutting conditions. [27-31] some studies also on
Understanding and determining how process parameters affect hard materials. Studies
will be done on these materials on CNC machines for parameters like a feed of tool,
speed of the spindle, and depth of cut, along with the effect of these conditions on
output parameters like rate of material removal, the workpiece surface finish, and tool
wear and, and by reviewing various research papers. Studies will also be done on these
materials with and without abrasive particles [32-43].
Cutting Condition
The cutting situations for white cast iron and its result like average surface
roughness (Ra), and cutting force (Fc) were predicted, optimized using Taguchi's
L18 orthogonal array (Ni-Hard). Output factor (Fc and Ra) to select the exact
cutting parameters use “smaller-is-better" to evaluate the (Input) signal-to-
(output) noise (S/N) ratio for the machining [25,55].

Figure 1 Experimental setup for turning operation of Inconel 718 bar [25]
Figure 1 shows experimental set up for turning of Inconel bar, various cutting
condtion are introduced by various resesrcher above fig. having cutting condition
that Hardness of the work piece casted and its 50 HRC and after cooling its 62
HRC and its in vaccum furnace having 3 bar pressure also job I stempered for
homogeneous microstructure.this indicates for experimentation must prepare for
cutting condition.
Tool Life
According to some studies, machining nickel-based alloys typically leads to
shorter tool lifetimes, low metal removal rates, high cutting pressures and power
consumption, inadequate chip form swarf disposal, and low metal removal rates.
It is discussed how crucial CVD PVD tool coating is. For hardened D2 tool steel
(60-62 HRC) Examined the consistency and produced surface quality by high
speed hard machining (HSHM). The experiment performed used, PCBN
(Polycrystalline Cubic Boron Nitride) inserts . Transmission of High
[18]
Definition Utilizing Transmission electron microscopy, the crystal structure was

examined (HR TEM). To analyze the electrical structure, X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy was used (XPS). By use of Micro Materials Nano-Test System,

micromechanical properties like impact fatigue fracture resistance, plasticity

index, and microhardness were examined. At 900 degrees Celsius, the resistance
to short-term oxidation was tested. When hardened H 13 tool steel and alloys like
Nickel-based superalloy and Ti alloy were ball nose end milled, coated tool was
studied (TiAl6V4)[21]. Figure 2a Tool life was measured when titanium alloy was
being machined with uncoated carbide inserts under varied coolant pressures,
using regular coolant flow, and in an environment that was higher in argon.
Figure 2a Tool life Graph for uncoated carbide inserts[31]
Figure 2b Tool life Graph for uncoated Polycrystalline tool[31]
Figure 2b Tool life measurements were made when cutting titanium alloy with
Polycrytallaine diamond inserts and conventional coolant.
The feed, monitored by the cutting velocity and nose radius, is the parameter that
most affects the polishing of the surface. Although the actual rake angle has a
slight bearing on surface finish, there are significant interactions between the

effective nose radius and rake angle. [35]

The findings show that while tool depth
of cut and tool feed are the two variables actually closely connected to, feed, the
cutting force of the tool, and cutting speed influence surface roughness [42].
Tool wear
Researchers concentrated on the many types of damage and wear that Various
loading situations were used on the PCBN inserts to produce an unfailing and
trustworthy wear simulation. Understanding the wear mechanisms that have a
noteworthy influence on the worth of the components produced is required to
enhance the tool material's activity, such as by minimizing the wear rate of the
flank. [11]
Using hardened D2 tool steel, examined the uniformity and quality of
the surfaces created by high-speed hard machining (HSHM) (60-62 HRc). In this
study, PCBN (Polycrystalline Cubic Boron Nitride) inserts are utilized. [18] The
experimental findings of a study using inserts coated with CBN-TiN to turn tough
materials are discussed. The study investigated the effects of processes parameter
like depth of cut, tool feed rate, cutting speed and cutting pressures, surface finish,
and wear of the tool. Additionally, for the same machining conditions, a
comparison of wear of tool, surface roughness, cutting pressures, and machining
cost between CBN-TiN and PCBN tipped inserts coated inserts is made. [8]
Machining experiments identify, tribochemical reactions, fracture, abrasion,
material transfer, and plastic flow as some of the wear processes based on the
thermal and mechanical demands placed on the wear section. [9]
It looked at how
the cutting environment affected the machinability of Incone1 718. When utilizing
a CNC lathe, workpiece surface roughness, insert flank wear, and cutting
pressures are the performance indicators for tool life. Some studies Cemented
carbide inserts that have been coated in the grades AC25 (TiN laminated by
chemical vapor deposition) and EH20Z-UP (TiN coated by physical vapor
deposition). Investigations were carried out at a set depth of cut using a variety of
cutting speeds, and feed rates side cutting edge angles (SCEAs), According to
cutting data, SCEA appears to have a strong impact on machining Inconel 718 in
determining the tool life of an insert, along with cutting speed and feed rate. [19]
After machining, Inconel 718 retains tensile residual stress, which results in poor
machinability. Surface roughness was decreased by combining cutting, feed,

depth of cut of the tool, and speed with the cutting tool's nose radius. It has been
observed that deep cuts cannot be made using a carbide tool. The best level of
surface quality on Inconel 718 can be achieved when utilizing a carbide tool.
With it, heavy-cut machining is not completed. Taking a lower cut of machining,
turning, and finishing or semi-finishing processes are shown in the performance.
Inserts Indicators of the performance tool life include cutting forces, flank wear,
and surface roughness. Mechanical vapor deposition inserts and physical vapor
deposition inserts, both grades EH20Z-UP, are available for the CNC lathe
machine. The research was primarily focused on the different forms of damage
and wear to the polycrystalline cubic boron nitrides (PCBN) cutting tool under
varied loading circumstances. Due to the fact that flank wear significantly affects
the quality of the components manufactured, understanding loss of material from
tool mechanisms is essential to maximizing the efficiency of the tool material[1–21].
Turning is performed using coated carbide inserts with a standard of K05-K25
and a grade of wnma 060408. At slower cutting speeds, the tool's average burn
rate is relatively low since the cutting zone has a low temperature. Faster tool
wears out at high cutting speeds leads to more severe patterns of tool failure, like
severe notching. Better tool performance of a coating is the result of the tool
being unable to operate within a particular temperature range. The performance
of Inconel 718 with carbide tips was found to be inferior while cutting at a high
pace. Due to the integrity of the surface being compromised by high cutting
speeds, uncoated carbide tips are recommended over coated tips. Coated tips
cannot improve high-speed performance. Below 250 m/min, tool-life is
diminishing and the maximum tool-life is found.
Diffusion loss occurs as a result of heat when cutting Inconel 718 using carbide
tools. Figure 3a illustrates the tool wear as observed under the microscope. The
measured levels for level 7 consist of a depth of cut of 0.25 mm, a feed rate of
100 mm/min, spindle and speed of 10,000 rpm, a tools with and without coating.
Figures 3a and 3b shows the tool effect of loss of material for both tools
(uncoated and coated).

Figure 3 a) Coated tool b) Uncoated tool [22] 22
Figure 3 c) Worn Tool [31]

The workpiece typically only receives 10% of the heat produced during
machining, with the remaining 90% going to the chip and cutting tool. Figure 3a
illustrates the coated tool's minimal wear. However, the induction heat source's
radiant and friction heat have a negative impact on the uncoated tool. The used
tool is shown in Figure 3b after being machined. Figure 3 c shows When cutting
with a high pressure coolant supply, the tool chip contact duration is reduced on
the worn inserts' rake faces. [31]
Better tribological characteristics are displayed by cutting fluid with
nanoparticles than base fluid [58,67 ].
In order to machine the Inconel 800 alloy,
Some Scholer examined a cutting fluid made of vegetable oil called Nano. For
Al2O3, MoS2, and graphite-based nano fluid, tool wear was taken into account.
In comparison to Al2O3 and MoS2, graphite-based Nano fluid had the best
results for tool wear. Less tool wear results from the good tribological and
cooling capabilities of graphite particles. They suggested that graphite has a
more covalent chemical structure than Al2O3 and MoS2, which significantly
influences its performance [59].
Sharma et al. used a hybrid nanofluid of Alumina
and MoS2 to study tool wear. They claim that adding hybrid nanoparticles
resulted in less tool wear than using base fluid and monotype nanolubricants [60].
With the aid of a coated carbide tool and Nano fluid MQL, Najiha et al.
examined the flank wear of the aluminium alloy 6061 T6. Results from water-

based Nano fluid with MQL and oil-based MQL were compared. They
discovered that the tool wear from water-based Nano fluid MQL and oil-based
MQL is strikingly similar. In water-based Nano fluid MQL, edge chipping is at a
minimum, leading to equal tool wear as in oil-based MQL. Therefore, they
proposed that oil-based lubricants might be substituted by water-based Nano
fluid MQL [61]. As water-based Nano fluid MQL combines a fast cooling rate of
water with a stronger lubricating effect of the nanoparticles, it also offers
environmental sustainability [60].
Diamond nanoparticles at concentrations of 1
and 2 weight percent were used by Huang et al. to test the micro-drilling
procedure. They came to the conclusion that the procedure with a 2 weight
percent nano diamond particle displays minimum temperature and, consequently,
a considerable reduction in tool wear after dry, pure MQL, and Nano fluid-based
MQL machining [61,62].
Some experiments are like to adjusted the flow rate of the mist application
working environment while turning AISI 1040 steel while maintaining constant
feed, speed, and depth of cut. They looked into how the temperature of the on-
chip tool contact, machining parameters, tool wear, and cutting force were
affected by nanofluid mist cooling. They discovered that a high concentration of
nanofluids with a low flow rate has the same effect on the temperature at the
tool-chip interface as flood cooling, but that it declines with rising concentration
and flow rate, resulting in less tool wear. In Figure 4, this impact is displayed.
Figure 4. Variation in cutting forces with a cemented carbide tool under changing cutting
parameters [63]
This might be the case because when air pressure rises, oil vaporises at a faster
pace, forming tiny droplets of aerosol that get smaller as air pressure rises. This

little aerosol is easy to insert into the tool, providing a low-cost heat-removal
interface that reduces tool wear [63,64]. Tool life in the machining process utilising a
CuO-based Nano fluid was studied by Vazquez et al. By using CuO Nano fluid,
the tool's service life was increased by 604%. CuO nanoparticles exhibit an anti-
wear property. This results in a lower frictional coefficient and is caused by
rolling action and CuO deposition on worn surfaces [65,66].
Effect of contact angle on tool wear
Using Al2O3 as a nano fluid, Mathew et al. adjusted the cutting parameters and
nanoparticle concentration during turning of EN8. Speed, feed, depth of cut, and
nanoparticle concentration were the process variables used to evaluate surface
roughness. Surface roughness was most significantly influenced by feed and
nanoparticle concentration, according to analysis of variance (ANOVA) [68] Some
experiment evaluated the performance of the surface roughness of the H3BO3
microfluid and the MoS2 nanofluid in the MQL system while spinning the AISI
1040. They believed that while nano and microfluidic systems function nearly
similarly at low speeds, nanofluidic systems outperform microfluidic systems at
high speeds because of their superior lubricating and cooling abilities. Compared
to H3BO3, MoS2 has a 30% lower surface roughness. This is due to the fact that
reduced friction and associated effects were caused by stable and consistent
nanofluid lubrication [69,70]
. Some researcher investigated the tribological
behaviour of an EN24-machining H3BO3 and TiO2-based nanofluid. They
concluded that a combination of these two nanoparticles produces a surface
finish that is superior to that produced by a single nanoparticle [71]. Using MQL,
Some researcher assessed the effects of adding graphite nanoparticles to cutting
fluid while turning AISI 1040. With the MQL process and a flow rate of 15 ml/hr
and 5 ml/hr, graphite nanoparticles were utilised in cutting fluid at weight
percentage concentrations of 0, 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5. Surface roughness was reduced
when graphite nanoparticles were added, and with a flow rate of 15 ml/hr, it was
discovered that a minimum of 0.3 wt% of nanoparticles were present . Some
[71]
researcher discovered that MQL flow rate, speed, and depth of cut have the
biggest effects on surface roughness [72] in the same article. When spinning AISI
4140 at high speeds, Some researcher examined the surface roughness using

nanofluid and twin jets of small amounts of lubricant (SQL). During the
experimentation, MWCNT and Al2O3 nanoparticles were employed, and it was
discovered that although MWCNT generated a mending effect during the turning
process, Al2O3, which had a sphere form, caused a rolling effect. They
discovered that important variables like residual surface tension also influence
surface roughness. They discovered that residual stress was tensile in character
while turning. Surface roughness for MWCNT is greatly reduced by SQL
implementation [73].As illustrated in Figure 5 [74], Some resesrcher discovered that
multi-walled carbon nanotubes-based nanofluid outperforms dry, wet, and
traditional cooling.
Figure 5. Residual stress on machine surface under different cutting environments [73]
Researcher examined SiC nanoparticles for EN-24 material with 0.5, 1 and 1.5
weight percent and discovered that 1.5 weight percent SiC nanofluid showed the
least amount of surface roughness. This might be as a result of the cooling effect
being caused by the 0.5 weight percent SiC nanofluid, which has the maximum
thermal conductivity and lowest coefficient of friction. As a result, decreased
tool wear and surface roughness were produced [75]. Surface roughness diminishes
gradually at first with increasing air pressure, but it lowers quickly up to 6 bar,
according to research by Huang et al. on the MQL system. The creation of tiny
droplets of oil aerosol, whose size decreases with rising air pressure, may be the
cause of the decrease in surface roughness because the flow rate rises as the air
pressure rises. This tiny aerosol enters the tool with ease thanks to a low-cost
interface that removes heat and, as a result, reduces surface roughness . Table
[76]
1 provides a thorough analysis of surface roughness.

Table1 Summary of surface roughness analysis

Size NanoParti Proces Proporti Base Remark Ref
cle s on Fluid er
ence
- Diamond Drillin 1 & 2 wt Vegetable- 1. MQL with 63
g % based nanodiamond
carrier oil particle with 2
wt % particles
shows minimum
temp during
drilling & hence
significantly
reduce.
2. Tool wear
type is cutting
edge failure.
60n Al2O3 Millin 0.40% Distilled Surface 80
m g water Roughness of
nanofluid MQL
improved both
11.3 & 12 % as
with MQL
- MWCNT Turnin 0.20% Ethylene Fluid is most 81
g glycol influencing
factor on Ra

followed by
Doc
- Al2O3 Turnin 0.1,0.5 & water By Anova, 68
g 1wt. % nanoparticle
concentration is
the most
influencing
factor, followed
by F, S & Doc
90 MoS2 & Turnin 0.25 wt Coconut Nanofluid 69
&10 H3 BO3 g % Oil provides 30%
0 less Ra than
Microfluid
80n Graphite Runni 0.3 wt % Conventio For mist 82
m ng nal water application with
soluble oil nanofluid Ra
decreased by 42
%, 30 & 28%
dry cut
80n Graphite Turnin 0.1,0.3 & Cutting Dry machining 60
m g 0.5 wt% fluid exhibits high
Ra, fluid
cooling
minimize it but
Nano particle

inclusion gives
minimum Ra
30- Graphene Turnin 0,0.2,06, 90 % Ra Reduces at 83
40n g 1 water + 5 higher % of
m % servo grapheme in 95
cut s oil % water, nano
fluid with high
5% servo
cutting vel. &
lower cutting
50% FR &
DOC
46- MWCNT Turnin 0.1 wt % DI water MWCNTperfor 63
60 and Al2O3 g mes
and significantly
50- better in case of
70 surface
roughness than
Al2O3
30 GnP turnin 0.5 Vol Vegatable For surface 84
g % oil roughness, nano
lubrication
outperformed
cryogenic
lubrication,

whereas, for
tool wear,
cryogenic
lubrication
shows better
results than
nanolubrication
2-50 MWCNT turnin 0.6 vol % Cutting oil 12 % 85
nm g improvement
was observed in
surface
roughness while
machining with
MWCNT
nanofluid than
dry machining
and pure MQL
system
< 80 Nano turnin 0,0.1,0.3 Water Surface 86
nm graphite g and 0.5 roughness was
wt %. reduced with
increasing
nanoparticle
concentration. It
was lower than

flood cooling
and pure MQL
system.
>52. CuO Turnin - Jojoba MQL with CuO 87
3 g oil(binder nanowire has
nm solution) minimum
surface
roughness as
CuO forms a
duplicating film
around the
tooltip because
of the magnetic
effect. it helps
to feel the flux
of monel k500,
creating
effective surface
roughness
40 CuO and Turnin 0,0.25,0. Water The high weight 88
nm Al2O3 g 5,1 % based oil percent of
and nanoparticles
20 with low feed
nm and medium
speed leads to

minimum
surface
roughness
3-8 Graphene, turnin 0.5,1,1.5, Canola oil, Among 89
nm g 2 and 2.5 olive oil, Graphine,
wt % and
Soyabean
Microstructure
Inconel 718 microstructure for Because the initial hardness of parts created using
alloy 718 SLM print technology is larger than that of parts created using wrought
techniques, post-treatment is necessary to produce the desired conditions and
characteristics. As a pre-aging treatment, these post-treatments must assess the
effects on microstructure, hardening properties, and microsegregation at 1100 °C
or 1250 °C. Compared to solutions made up of heat-treated samples, printed
samples are more complex because of the quantity of cooling and heating passes
made during manufacturing. At the subgrain boundary, the components,
including the leaves, are thoroughly dissolved in a solution at 1200-degree
Celcius heat treatment. A coarsening effect on the grain was discovered
following recrystallization during the solution treatment [2,3,5,8–11,14,18,21,23–26,27–36]
Figure 4 shows Inconel 718 microsture after 21 minutes.

Figure 4 Inconel 718 microstructure following 21 minutes of machining with self

propelled rotary tools[31]
Grain size
In comparison to any other conventional material, the alloy Inconel 718 made
using SLM techniques showed excellent gamma size and diffusion dislocation.
Both alloys' microstructures were fine-tuned and their microhardness was raised
as a result of the superalloy's higher torsion pressure. Superalloy was Annealed
at 60 0degree Celcius for two hours when deformed, and the microhardness rose.
Compared to traditional procedures, selective laser melting techniques have a
higher microhardness. Higher microhardness indicates a difficult-to-machine
material. During undercooling, the superalloy K4169's microstructure and tensile
behavior were assessed. With a rise in the rate of undercooling, changes in
dendrite form, intergranular phase, and grain size have been observed. Laves
phase distribution and enhanced strength and parameter qualities had been
reported at high undercooling uniform temperatures. By combining its highest
mechanical strength, Inconel 718 has advanced in the defense industries' use of
it, never replacing any other. The strength of the Inconel 718 alloy's ns state
varies on the grain size at room temperature; at 1920 MPa, smaller grains have a
higher strength. After heat treatment, when Inconel 718 is in its NS form and has
exceptional strength and sufficient ductility, it is preferred for usage. For these
alloys to function well, we must create a superior heat-treatment procedure. Two
types of sample Inconel 718 heat-treated by Making variation temperatures were
measured by Moiz Grain Size. According to the results grain size observed by
doing mechanical tests, increasing grain size improves creep life while
decreasing hardness and tensile properties. At room temperature, little grains
with lesser ductility were discovered. Inconel 718's'and partial phases completely
dissolve after two hours of solution heat treatment at 1050 degrees Celcius. For
higher strength, tiny grain size is required, and it’s observed that the same
temperature delta into a matrix 960 degree Celcius phase observed in along with
increased grain size grain boundaries diminishes ductility.[7,15,17,21,27,37–40]
Hardness
Poor machinability and shorter tool life as a result of precipitated phases

"Inconel 718's high hardness is also a result of and. Carbides form at

temperatures between 600 and 670°C, and samples are reinforced at
temperatures between 600 and 648°C ", the highest hardness rating of which has
been validated and demonstrated to be 360 HV. The material exhibits phase
transitions at temperatures between 760 and 820 degrees Celsius. a softening of
the surface of 230 HV was found at 900 °C. Shrinkage of the material is
observed between 820-950°C, a higher delta phase value being created. After
heating and sowing Inconel 718 at various temperatures, the tensile and hardness
characteristics were evaluated. It’s a functional relationship between primary
aging and reheating at 650°-900°C for 5-480 minutes. The variables that affected
changes in microstructure at various strengths were identified. At temperatures
between 650 and 750°C, the phase typically nucleates homogeneously and has
the strongest properties. Phases are produced in a heterogeneous fashion at
temperatures of 850 °C and above.[56,57]
Microstructure Study and Mechanical testing

The microstructure of the workpiece affected the stability of the cutting process
and the rate of tool wear during machining the hard-to-machine titanium alloys
(9Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-555). Various cutting circumstances, the impacts of
workpiece microstructure evolution, tool wear friction, and, temperature rise on
the tool-chip interface have been studied. Mean cutting forces and temperature
proceed in various ways when cutting speed rises, depending on the
microstructure under consideration. The results show that while cutting the Ti-
555 alloy, cutting tools wear differently than when cutting with Ti-6Al-4V
insert.[10]
A few studies on related research assessed and talked about the phases'
microstructure, grain size precipitation, tool wear, and segregation.
Microstructure and machining parameter research uses, scanning electron
microscopy (SEM), high-resolution photography as characterization techniques,
and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) optical microscopy (OM).
On the machining surface, observations are made, worn tool, generated chips and
cutting force measurement during hard turning of AISI 52100 steel using CBN
tool at the cutting conditions: v = 200 m/min, f = 0.08 mm/rev and d = 0.2 mm

Figure 5 A) View of a machined surface using SEM [42]

Figure 5 (A) showed flat and a surface with a regular, smooth pattern and
relatively few undulations, long scratch marks and fine feed marks caused by
shearing of machined work surface under the cutting edge which indicates a
better surface finish. An acceptable level of surface roughness for the surface
finish (Ra < 1.0 µm) was produced due to exclusion of chatter formation, no chip
entanglement and less plastic deformation of machined surface during
machining.

Figure 5 (b) optical image of flank wear in a CBN tool[42]
The scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of hard turned component Figure
5 (b) shows the optical micrograph of tool wear profile of cBN tool at flank face.
The main wear mechanism observed in hard turning is abrasion. Associated
morphology with this wear action is characterised through the emergence of
abrasive wear such as scars and grooves on the tool flank, caused either due to
scratching of tool cutting edge and flank by ultra-hard carbide (chromium-carbide)
particles in the workpiece material or due to abrasion caused by sharp objects,
such as worn debris or perhaps snatched cBN particles from the tool itself.
Figure 5 (c) SEM observation of chip morphology [42]
Figure 5 (c) confirms the generation of saw-tooth type chip as a result of cyclic
cracking by producing extremely intense shear bands. The upper surface of the
chip is observed as rough which has greater slanting corrugations with more
periodical cracks (named as serrated teeth) of the outer edge resulting from plastic
deformation of chip caused by rise of temperature during hard turning. Likewise,
the cutting force measured for use in cutting hardened AISI 52100 steel is shown
in Figure 5 (d)

Figure 5 (d) cutting force for AISI 52100 steel 42
Machinability Issues
The focus is on Inconel 718, and major developments and findings in its
machining are discussed. To facilitate the switch to dry machining, some
alternatives to using coolants are researched, as well as various coating
techniques. [28]
Machining issues with Inconel 718

Study gives the significance of various cutting fluids when working with hard
materials which describes the characteristics of hard-to-machine materials and
how to review and recognize them. Key issues like environmental and health
concerns that are usage of various coolants in the material cutting business are
also examined. Finally, the review and discussion of the progress made in
lowering fluid usage reduction or elimination. [24]
A summary of the key
elements influencing surface integrity in steel hard machining has been provided
by some research. By way of residual stresses, surface roughness, work
hardening layers, and white layer, surface integrity (SI) issues have been
characterized. Lowering constraints, the factors that most directly affect the SI of
a hard-machined component are those related to the workpiece's material
properties, the cutting tool's characteristics, the machine tool stiffness, and the
cutting fluid qualities.23In addition to being closely tied to the type of, cutting
tools, lubricants and machining parameters, machining operation. Inconel 718's
machinability is a material property. Surface integrity, mechanical characteristics

including residual stresses, surface roughness, hardness, and the metallurgical

state of the work material all have an impact on how well a component is
machined. The input characteristics of the cutting process, like feed, machining
speed, depth of cut, and tool shape, influence these performance metrics.
Therefore, to get the desired results, the choice of the machining process, cutting
tools, tool form, and lubrication method must be controlled and modified. [41]
Phase And Structural Microstructure Study

Table 2 Technique used to find various output parameters of hard
machining
Technique Remarks Reference
Optical The resolution of this instrument is 0.2 µm - 0.7 µm, which
Microscope allows it being utilised to analyze tool wear, fracture 11
measurement, surface roughness comparison, chip, texture of

materials, morphology analysis, morphology, and grain size
measurement.
X-ray diffraction Detailed microstructures are scanned and spots are scanned 21,26,40
using a resolution between 11nm and 13nm during tool wear
analysis.
Scanning The surface of the sample in 3D, the grain size, the tool wear 24,34,42
Electron morphology, and the material's texture
Microscopy
Effect Of Nanofluid
It was observed that thermal conductivity was increased by 19.74 % and 36.21%
for Al2O3 and CuO nanofluid, respectively. For machining operation, better heat
transfer fluid was obtained at an optimum value of 0.3 volume % for Al2O3 and
0.15 volume % for CuO [44].
Table 3 The percentage of Al2O3 and CuO
Flow
Reference Base Fluid Nanoparticle Wt Ratio
Rate
[45] vegetable oil Al2O3 100ml/h 0%, 4%, 6%vol
soluble
[46] Al2O3 - 0%, 0.1% wt.
cutting oil

0.75 %, 1 %, 1.5 %
of Al2O3 and 0.01
SAE20W40 Al2O3, SDS, % SDS, MQL
[47] -
engine oil ZnO along 0.75 %, 1%,
1.5% ZnO and
0.01 % SDS.
Oil10 (SAE CuO and 0.2% to 1% and

[48] -
10W) AL2O3 0.5% to 2%
Soluble 0.2%,0.4%,0.6%
[49] Al2O3 40 ml/h
Cutting oil wt%1wt%
2.5 0.25,0.75and 1.25

[50] vegetable oil Al2O3
mi/min vol%
0.25%, 0.5%,
distilled
[51] CuO and Al2O3 - 0.75% and 1.0%
water
(wt. percentage)
0% 2% 4% nano
[52] Vegetable Oil Al2O3 40 ml/hr
additives 0.2 g
Al2O3 and
[53] E2000 40 ml/hr 0, 2 and 4%
MWCNT

0.05, 0.15,0.3, 0.5

[54] water Al2O3 and CuO -
and 1 vol. %.
From table 3, the percentage of Al2O3 and CuO used in the base fluid is analyzed
and is shown in Figure 6.
Figure 6. Weight of CuO and Al2O3 nanoparticles used by different researchers.
Conclusions
From the above literature review following work of various researcher are
identified and Issues Machining Inconel 718 from the above literature review
 Because conductivity is low thermal and changes in microstructure this
material is difficult to machining, Tool wear morphology, Grain size,
material texture, and a 3D representation of the sample's surface are all
examined using Scanning electron microscopy.
 Tool wears analysis, spot scan, and microstructure area scan are
performed using X-ray diffraction.
 The study also provides details regarding the development of white layers
and surface integrity.
 Understand cutting at a rapid speed of Inconel718 material gives BUC
chips
 Understand that dry machining and using coolent gives various effect on
MRR and Surface finish.
 Understand about effect of nano fluid on surface finish and tool wear
 Understand about effect of nanofluid on machining output parameter on

surface roughness
REFERENCES
1. Wang ZY, Rajurkar KP. Cryogenic machining of hard-to-cut materials.
Published online 2000:168-175.
2. Ren XJ, Yang QX, James RD, Wang L. Cutting temperatures in hard
turning chromium hard facings with PCBN tooling. J Mater Process
Technol. 2004;147(1):38-44. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.10.013
3. Singh PN, Raghukandan K, Rathinasabapathi M, Pai BC. Electric discharge
machining of Al-10%SiCP as-cast metal matrix composites. J Mater
Process Technol. 2004;155-156(1-3):1653-1657.
doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.321
4. Parida AK, Maity KP. An Experimental Investigation to Optimize Multi-
Response Characteristics of Ni-Hard Material Using Hot Machining. Adv
Eng Forum. 2016;16:16-23. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/aef.16.16
5. Su Y, He N, Li L, et al. Refrigerated cooling air cutting of difficult-to-cut
materials. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2007;47(6):927-933.
doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.07.005
6. Ho KH, Newman ST. State-of-the-art electrical discharge machining
(EDM). Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2003;43(13):1287-1300.
doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00162-7
7. Sun S, Brandt M, Dargusch MS. Thermally enhanced machining of a hard-
to-machine materials review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2010;50(8):663-680.
8. More AS, Jiang W, Brown WD, Malshe AP. Tool wear and machining
performance of CBN-TiN coated carbide inserts and PCBN compact inserts
in turning AISI 4340 hardened steel. J Mater Process Technol. 2006;180(1-
3):253-262. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.06.013
9. Grzesik W. Wear of ceramic tools in hard machining. J Achiev Mater
Manuf Eng. 2008;26(2):127-130.
10. Nouari M, Makuch H. Experimental investigation on the effect of the
material microstructure on tool wear when machining hard titanium alloys:
Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-555. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater. 2013;41:259-269.

doi:10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2013.04.011
11. Poulachon G, Moisan A, Jawahir IS. Tool-wear mechanisms in hard turning
with polycrystalline cubic boron nitride tools. Wear. 2001;250-251(1-
12):576-586. doi:10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00609-3
12. El-Gallab M, Sklad M. Machining of Al/SiC particulate metal-matrix
composites Part I: Tool performance. J Mater Process Technol. 1998;83(1-
3):151-158. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00054-5
13. Sreejith PS, Ngoi BKA. Dry machining: Machining of the future. J Mater
Process Technol. 2000;101(1):287-291. doi:10.1016/S0924-
0136(00)00445-3
14. Sahin Y, Sur G. The effect of Al2O3, TiN and Ti (C, N) based CVD
coatings on tool wear in machining metal matrix composites. Surf Coatings
Technol. 2004;179(2-3):349-355. doi:10.1016/S0257-8972(03)00802-8
15. Gupta K, Paulo Davim J. High-speed machining. High-Speed Mach.
2020;41:1-311. doi:10.1016/C2017-0-02542-9
16. Davies MA, Burns TJ, Evans CJ. On the dynamics of chip formation in
machining hard metals. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol. 1997;46(1):25-30.
doi:10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60768-9
17. Mohanty S. MODELLING OF HARD TURNING PROCESS Master of
Technology In Mechanical Engineering Under Guidance of Prof . K . P .
Maity Dept . of Mechanical Engg. Nit , Rourkela. 2014;(May).
18. El-Wardany TI, Kishawy HA, Elbestawi MA. Surface integrity of die
material in high speed hard machining, Part 1: Micrographical analysis. J
Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME. 2000;122(4):620-631. doi:10.1115/1.1286367
19. Rahman M, Seah WKH, Teo TT. The machinability of Inconel 718. J Mater
Process Technol. 1997;63(1-3):199-204. doi:10.1016/S0924-
0136(96)02624-6
20. Kramar D, Kopač J. High-pressure cooling in the machining of hard-to-
machine materials. Stroj Vestnik/Journal Mech Eng. 2009;55(11):685-694.
21. Endrino JL, Fox-Rabinovich GS, Gey C. Hard AlTiN, AlCrN PVD coatings
for machining of austenitic stainless steel. Surf Coatings Technol.
2006;200(24):6840-6845. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.10.030
22. Kim EJ, Lee CM. A study on the optimal machining parameters of the

induction assisted milling with Inconel 718. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(2).

doi:10.3390/ma12020233
23. Iuliana BC. Factors-influencing-surface-integrity-in-hard-machining-of-
steels-A-review.doc. Int J Sci Eng Res. 2015;6(5):38-43.
24. Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman ST. Environmentally conscious machining
of difficult-to-machine materials with regard to cutting fluids. Int J Mach
Tools Manuf. 2012;57:83-101. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.02.002
25. Yücel E, Günay M. Modelling and optimization of the cutting conditions in
hard turning of high-alloy white cast iron (Ni-Hard). Proc Inst Mech Eng
Part C J Mech Eng Sci. 2013;227(10):2280-2290.
doi:10.1177/0954406212471755
26. Fox-Rabinovich GS, Kovalev AI, Aguirre MH, et al. Design and
performance of AlTiN and TiAlCrN PVD coatings for machining of hard to
cut materials. Surf Coatings Technol. 2009;204(4):489-496.
doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.08.021
27. Rizvi SA, Ali W, Ahmad M, Delhi N, Delhi N. SOME STUDY OF
MACHINABILITY BY TURNING PROCESS-A. 2016;II(6):1-20.
28. Dudzinski D, Devillez A, Moufki A, Larrouquère D, Zerrouki V, Vigneau
J. A review of developments towards dry and high speed machining of
Inconel 718 alloy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2004;44(4):439-456.
doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00159-7
29. Outeiro JC, Pina JC, M’Saoubi R, Pusavec F, Jawahir IS. Analysis of
residual stresses induced by dry turning of difficult-to-machine materials.
CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol. 2008;57(1):77-80.
doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.076
30. Umbrello D, Hua J, Shivpuri R. Hardness-based flow stress and fracture
models for numerical simulation of hard machining AISI 52100 bearing
steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2004;374(1-2):90-100.
doi:10.1016/j.msea.2004.01.012
31. Ezugwu EO. Key improvements in the machining of difficult-to-cut
aerospace superalloys. Int.JMachToolsManuf. 2005;45(12-13):1353-1367.
32. Koenig W, Komanduri R, Toenshoff HK, Ackershott G. Machining of Hard

Materials. CIRP Ann. 1984;33(2):417-427. doi:10.1016/s0007-

8506(16)30164-0
33. Guo YB, Liu CR. Mechanical properties of hardened AISI 52100 steel in
hard machining processes. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2002;124(1):1-9.
doi:10.1115/1.1413775
34. Derflinger V, Brändle H, Zimmermann H. New hard/lubricant coating for
dry machining. Surf Coatings Technol. 1999;113(3):286-292.
doi:10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00004-3
35. Singh S, Maheshwari S, Pandey PC. Some investigations into the electric
discharge machining of hardened tool steel using different electrode
materials. J Mater Process Technol. 2004;149(1-3):272-277.
doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.11.046
36. Tansel IN, Arkan TT, Bao WY, et al. Tool wear estimation in micro-
machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2000;40(4):609-620.
doi:10.1016/s0890-6955(99)00074-7
37. Calamaz M, Limido J, Nouri M, et al. Toward a better understanding of tool
wear effect through a comparison between experiments and SPH numerical
modeling of machining hard materials. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater.
2009;27(3):595-604. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2008.09.005
38. Ezugwu EO, Wang ZM, Okeke CI. Tool life and surface integrity when
machining Inconel 718 with PVD- and CVD-coated tools. Tribol Trans.
1999;42(2):353-360. doi:10.1080/10402009908982228
39. Inasaki I, Tönshoff HK, Howes TD. Abrasive Machining in the Future.
CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol. 1993;42(2):723-732. doi:10.1016/S0007-
8506(07)62535-9
40. Guo YB, Li W, Jawahir IS. Surface integrity characterization and prediction
in the machining of hardened and difficult-to-machine alloys: A state-of-art
research review and analysis. Mach Sci Technol. 2009;13(4):437-470.
doi:10.1080/10910340903454922
41. Paturi UMR, B. VD, Reddy NS. Progress of machinability on the
machining of Inconel 718: A comprehensive review on the perception of
cleaner machining. Clean Eng Technol. 2021;5:100323.
doi:10.1016/j.clet.2021.100323

42. Kumar SRD and A. Experimental investigation on cutting force and surface
roughness in machining of hardened AISI 52100 steel using CBN tool
Sudhansu Ranjan Das * and Amaresh Kumar Debabrata Drupal. Int J Mach
Mach Mater. 2016;18(Nos.5/6):501-521.
43. Mukhtarova KS, Shakhov R V, Smirnov V V, and Mukhtarov S K 2019
Microstructure and microhardness studies of Inconel718, manufactured by
selective laser melting and subjected to severe plastic deformation and
annealing IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering
672012049.
44. Chaudhari, S. S.; Chakule, R. R.; Talmale, P. S. Experimental Study of Heat
Transfer Characteristics of Al2O3 and CuO Nanofluids for Machining
Application. Mater. Today Proc., 2019, 18, 788–797.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.499.
45. Vasu, V.; Reddy, G. P. K. Effect of Minimum Quantity Lubrication with Al
2O 3 nanoparticles on Surface Roughness, Tool Wear and Temperature
Dissipation in achining Inconel 600 Alloy. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part N J.
Nanoeng. Nanosyst., 2012, 225 (1), 3–15.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1740349911427520.
46. Khalil, A. N. M.; Ali, M. A. M.; Azmi, A. I. Effect of Al2O3 Nanolubricant
with SDBS on Tool Wear During Turning Process of AISI 1050 with
Minimal Quantity Lubricant. ProcediaManuf.,2015,2(February),130–134.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.023.
47. Anburaj, R. International Journal on Recent Researches In Science ,
Engineering & Technology A Study of Minimum Quantity Lubrication
with Nano Cutting Fluid on Surface Roughness and Chip Thickness in
Turning Inconel 718. Int. J. Recent Res. Sci. Eng. Technol., 2016, 5 (1), 0–
5.
48. Alimirzaloo, V.; SheydayiGurchinQaleh, S.; MashhadiKeshtiban, P.; Ahmadi,
S. Investigation of the Effect of CuO and AL2O3 Nanolubricants on the
Surface Roughness in the Forging Process of Aluminum Alloy. Proc. Inst .
Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol., 2017, 231 (12), 1595–1604.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650117702816.
49. Singh, R. K.; Sharma, A. K.; Dixit, A. R.; Tiwari, A. K.; Pramanik, A.;
Mandal, A. Performance Evaluation of Alumina-Graphene Hybrid Nano-

Cutting Fluid in Hard Turning. J. Clean. Prod., 2017, 162, 830–845.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.104.
50. Sharma, A. K.; Katiyar, J. K.; Bhaumik, S.; Roy, S. Influence of
Alumina/MWCNT Hybrid Nanoparticle Additives on Tribological
Properties of Lubricants in Turning Operations. Friction, 2019, 7 (2), 153–
168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-018-0199-5.
51. Hegab, H.; Umer, U.; Soliman, M.; Kishawy, H. A. Effects of Nano-
Cutting Fluids on Tool Performance and Chip Morphology during
Machining Inconel 718. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2018, 96 (9–12),
3449–3458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1825-0.
52. Hegab, H.; Darras, B.; Kishawy, H. A. Sustainability Assessment of
Machining with Nano-Cutting Fluids. Procedia Manuf., 2018, 26, 245–254.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.033.
53. Chaudhari, S. S.; Chakule, R. R.; Talmale, P. S. Experimental Study of Heat
Transfer Characteristics of Al2O3 and CuO Nanofluids for Machining
Application. Mater. Today Proc., 2019, 18, 788–797.
54. Paturi UMR, B. VD, Reddy NS. Progress of machinability on the machining
of Inconel 718:A comprehensive review on the perception of cleaner
machining. Clean Eng Technol. 2021;5:100323.
doi:10.1016/j.clet.2021.100323
55. Kim EJ, Lee CM. A study on the optimal machining parameters of the
induction assisted milling with Inconel 718. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(2).
doi:10.3390/ma12020233
56. Anthony Xavior M, Duchosal A, Jeyapandiarajan P. Experimental
Investigation on Work Hardening and Residual Stress during Machining of
Inconel718. Mater Today Proc. 2018;5(5):13301-13308.
doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.322
57 Venkatesan K, Ramanujam R. Statistical approach for optimization of
influencing parameters in laser assisted machining (LAM) of Inconel alloy.
Meas J Int Meas Confed. 2016;89:97-108.
doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2016.04.021
58 Liew, P. J.; Shaaroni, A.; Razak, J. A.; Abu Bakar, M. H. Comparison
between Carbon Nanofiber (CNF) Nanofluid with Deionized Water on Tool
Life and Surface Roughness in Turning of D2 Steel. J. Adv. Res. Fluid
Mech. Therm. Sci., 2018, 46 (1), 169–174.
59 Gupta, M. K.; Jamil, M.; Wang, X.; Song, Q.; Liu, Z.; Mia, M.; Hegab, H.;
Khan, A. M.; Collado, A. G.; Pruncu, C. I.; et al. Performance Evaluation
of Vegetable Oil-Based Nano-Cutting Fluids in Environmentally Friendly
Machining of Inconel-800 Alloy. Materials (Basel)., 2019, 12 (7).

https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172792.
60 Sharma, A. K.; Singh, R. K.; Dixit, A. R.; Tiwari, A. K.; Singh, M. An
Investigation on Tool Flank Wear Using Alumina/MoS2 Hybrid Nanofluid
in Turning Operation; Springer International Publishing, 2019; Vol. 1.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99353-9_23.
61 Najiha, M. S.; Rahman, M. M.; Yusoff, A. R. Flank Wear Characterization
in Aluminum Alloy (6061 T6) with Nanofluid Minimum Quantity
Lubrication Environment Using an Uncoated Carbide Tool. J. Manuf. Sci.
Eng. Trans. ASME, 2015, 137 (6), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030060.
62 Najiha, M. S.; Rahman, M. M.; Kadirgama, K. Performance of Water-
Based TiO2 Nanofluid during the Minimum Quantity Lubrication
Machining of Aluminium Alloy, AA6061-T6; Elsevier Ltd, 2016; Vol. 135.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.015.
63 Huang, W. T.; Wu, D. H.; Chen, J. T. Robust Design of Using
Nanofluid/MQL in Micro-Drilling. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2016, 85
(9–12), 2155–2161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7382-x.
64 Huang, W. T.; Chen, J. T. Application of Intelligent Modeling Methods to
Enhance the Effectiveness of Nanofluid / Micro Lubrication in Microdeep
Drilling Holes Machining. J. Adv. Mech. Des. Syst. Manuf., 2020, 14 (7), 1–
26. https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.2020jamdsm0099.
65 Amrita, M.; Srikant, R. R.; Sitaramaraju, A. V.; Prasad, M. M. S.; Krishna,
P. V. Experimental Investigations on Influence of Mist Cooling Using
Nanofluids on Machining Parameters in Turning AISI 1040 Steel. Proc.
Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol., 2013, 227 (12), 1334–1346.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650113491934.
66 Vázquez, K. D.; Cantú, D. S.; Segura, A. F.; Araiz, F.; Peña-Parás, L.;
Maldonado, D. Application of Nanofluids to Improve Tool Life in
Machining Processes. Lubr. Maint. Tribotechnology LUBMAT 2014,
Manchester, UK, 2014, No. Paper number: L146058, 1–8.
67. Sharma, K. A.; Tiwari, A. K.; Dixit, A. R. Mechanism of Nanoparticles
Functioning and Effects in Machining Processes: A Review. Mater. Today
Proc., 2015, 2 (4–5), 3539–3544.
68. Mani, N. K.; Mathew, C.; Kallanickal, P. M. Optimization of Cutting
Parameters & Nanoparticle Concentration in CNC Turning of EN8 Steel
Using Al2O3 Nanofluids as Coolant. Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol., 2015, 29
(6), 290–294. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/ijett-v29p254.
69. Pasam, V. K.; Srikant Revuru, R.; Gugulothu, S. Comparing the
Performance & Viability of Nano and Microfluids in Minimum Quantity
Lubrication for Machining AISI1040 Steel. Mater. Today Proc., 2018, 5
(2), 8016–8024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.486.
70. Krishna, P. V.; Parimala, N. Effectiveness of Coconut Oil Based Nanofluids
in Machining of Steel. 2019, 2 (1), 49–57.
71. Penta, S. R.; Rao, P. M.; Avvari, R. K. Tribological Behavior of the Boric
Acid and Titanium Dioxide Based Nanofluid in Machining of EN24 Steel.
Tribologia, 2020, 37 (1–2), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.30678/fjt.85312.
72. M. M. S. P. Performance Evaluation of Nano Graphite Inclusions in Cutting
Fluids With Mql Technique in Turning of Aisi 1040 Steel. Int. J. Res. Eng.

Technol., 2013, 02 (11), 381–393.

https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2013.0211058
73. Usha, M.; Rao, G. S. Optimization of Multiple Objectives by Genetic
Algorithm for Turning of AISI 1040 Steel Using Al2O3 Nano Fluid with
MQL. Tribol. Ind., 2020, 42 (1), 70–80.
https://doi.org/10.24874/ti.2020.42.01.07.
74. Roy, S. Msec2013-1067 High Speed Turning of Aisi 4140 Steel Using
Nanofluid. 2016, 1–6.
75. Roy, S.; Ghosh, A. High-Speed Turning of AISI 4140 Steel by Multi-
Layered TiN Top-Coated Insert with Minimum Quantity Lubrication
Technology and Assessment of near Tool-Tip Temperature Using Infrared
Thermography. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf., 2014, 228
(9), 1058–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405413514570.
76. Thakur, A.; Manna, A.; Samir, S. Multi-Response Optimization of Turning
Parameters during Machining of EN-24 Steel with SiC Nanofluids Based
Minimum Quantity Lubrication. Silicon, 2020, 12 (1), 71–85.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-019-00102-y.
77. Leishen, Zhang, Jingming, Tamori. economic Research, 2016, 9 (2), 118–
131.
78. Pasam, V. K.; Srikant Revuru, R.; Gugulothu, S. Comparing the
Performance & Viability of Nano and Microfluids in Minimum Quantity
Lubrication for Machining AISI1040 Steel. Mater. Today Proc., 2018, 5
(2), 8016–8024.
79. Huang, W. T.; Wu, D. H.; Chen, J. T. Robust Design of Using

Nanofluid/MQL in Micro-Drilling. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2016, 85
(9–12), 2155–2161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7382-x
80. Khan, A. M.; Jamil, M.; Ul Haq, A.; Hussain, S.; Meng, L.; He, N.
Sustainable Machining. Modeling and Optimization of Temperature and
Surface Roughness in the Milling of AISI D2 Steel. Ind. Lubr. Tribol.,
2019, 71 (2), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILT-11-2017-0322.
81 Patole, P. B.; Kulkarni, V. V. Optimization of Process Parameters Based
on Surface Roughness and Cutting Force in MQL Turning of AISI 4340
Using Nano Fluid. Mater. Today Proc., 2018, 5 (1), 104–112.
82. Amrita, M.; Srikant, R. R.; Sitaramaraju, A. V. Performance Evaluation of
Nanographite-Based Cutting Fluid in Machining Process. Mater. Manuf.
Process., 2014, 29 (5), 600–605.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2014.893060.
83. Singh, R. K.; Sharma, A. K.; Bishwajeet; Mandal, V.; Gaurav, K.; Nag, A.;
Kumar, A.; Dixit, A. R.; Mandal, A.; Kumar Das, A. Influence of
Graphene-Based Nanofluid with Minimum Quantity Lubrication on Surface
Roughness and Cutting Temperature in Turning Operation. Mater. Today
Proc., 2018, 5 (11), 24578–24586.
84. Yıldırım, Ç. V. Investigation of Hard Turning Performance of Eco-Friendly
Cooling Strategies: Cryogenic Cooling and Nanofluid Based MQL. Tribol.
Int., 2020, 144 (December 2019).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2019.106127.

85 Öndin, O.; Kıvak, T.; Sarıkaya, M.; Yıldırım, Ç. V. Investigation of the

Influence of MWCNTs Mixed Nanofluid on the Machinability
Characteristics of PH 13-8 Mo Stainless Steel. Tribol. Int., 2020, 148
(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106323.
86. Amrita, M.; Srikant, R. R.; Raju, A. V. S. R. Performance Evaluation and
Economic Analysis of Minimum Quantity Lubrication with Pressurized /
Non-Pressurized Air and Nanofluid Mixture. Int. J. Mech. Aerospace, Ind.
Mechatron. Manuf. Eng., 2015, 9 (6), 929–934.
87. Arul, K.; Senthil Kumar, V. S. Magnetorheological Based Minimum
Quantity Lubrication (MR-MQL) with Additive n-CuO. Mater. Manuf.
Process., 2020, 35 (4), 405–414.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2020.1732410.
88. Haghnazari, S.; Abedini, V. Effects of Hybrid Al2O3–CuO Nanofluids on
Surface Roughness and Machining Forces during Turning AISI 4340. SN
Appl. Sci., 2021, 3 (2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-04088-w.
12. Copyright Forms

You must include your fully-completed, signed SERSC copyright release form when
you submit your paper. WE MUST HAVE THIS FORM BEFORE YOUR PAPER CAN
BE PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL. The copyright form is available from journal home
page. Authors should send their copyright forms to FAX. +82-70-7614-3027 or E-mail
journal@sersc.org.

Authors
Author’s Name:-Mr Kishor Khanderao Powar , Research
Scholar at KLS Gogate Institute of Technology,Belgavi.


MFE004

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

MFE004

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

International Journal of xxxxxx

Vol. x, No. x, (20xx), pp. xx-xx

Study On Machinability Issues of Hard to Machining Inconel 718

kishor.powar5570@gmail.com , ankallol@git.edu , sshivakumar@git.edu ,

Corresponding author: nikhil.rangaswamy@reva.edu.in

Keywords: Inconel 718, Microstructure, Machinability, Tool wear

ISSN: XXXX-XXXX IJXX 1

ISSN: XXXX-XXXX IJXX 2

Definition Utilizing Transmission electron microscopy, the crystal structure was

ISSN: XXXX-XXXX IJXX 3

micromechanical properties like impact fatigue fracture resistance, plasticity

Figure 2a Tool life Graph for uncoated carbide inserts[31]

Figure 2b Tool life Graph for uncoated Polycrystalline tool[31]

ISSN: XXXX-XXXX IJXX 4

effective nose radius and rake angle. [35]

ISSN: XXXX-XXXX IJXX 5

ISSN: XXXX-XXXX IJXX 6

Figure 3 a) Coated tool b) Uncoated tool [22] 22

Figure 3 c) Worn Tool [31]

ISSN: XXXX-XXXX IJXX 7

ISSN: XXXX-XXXX IJXX 8

ISSN: XXXX-XXXX IJXX 9

1 provides a thorough analysis of surface roughness.

ISSN: XXXX-XXXX IJXX 10

Table1 Summary of surface roughness analysis

- Diamond Drillin 1 & 2 wt Vegetable- 1. MQL with 63

carrier oil particle with 2

drilling & hence

60n Al2O3 Millin 0.40% Distilled Surface 80

- MWCNT Turnin 0.20% Ethylene Fluid is most 81

ISSN: XXXX-XXXX IJXX 11

- Al2O3 Turnin 0.1,0.5 & water By Anova, 68

90 MoS2 & Turnin 0.25 wt Coconut Nanofluid 69

&10 H3 BO3 g % Oil provides 30%

80n Graphite Runni 0.3 wt % Conventio For mist 82

m ng nal water application with

soluble oil nanofluid Ra

80n Graphite Turnin 0.1,0.3 & Cutting Dry machining 60

m g 0.5 wt% fluid exhibits high

ISSN: XXXX-XXXX IJXX 12

30- Graphene Turnin 0,0.2,06, 90 % Ra Reduces at 83

40n g 1 water + 5 higher % of

cut s oil % water, nano

fluid with high

cutting vel. &

46- MWCNT Turnin 0.1 wt % DI water MWCNTperfor 63

60 and Al2O3 g mes

50- better in case of

30 GnP turnin 0.5 Vol Vegatable For surface 84

g % oil roughness, nano

ISSN: XXXX-XXXX IJXX 13

2-50 MWCNT turnin 0.6 vol % Cutting oil 12 % 85

and pure MQL

< 80 Nano turnin 0,0.1,0.3 Water Surface 86

nm graphite g and 0.5 roughness was

was lower than

ISSN: XXXX-XXXX IJXX 14

and pure MQL

>52. CuO Turnin - Jojoba MQL with CuO 87

3 g oil(binder nanowire has

to feel the flux

40 CuO and Turnin 0,0.25,0. Water The high weight 88

nm Al2O3 g 5,1 % based oil percent of

20 with low feed