Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Gage R&R

    Uploaded by

    Kevin Huynh
    The document summarizes the results of a gage repeatability and reproducibility study. The study measured a characteristic on 10 plastic tray parts using 3 appraisers over 3 trials each. The measurement results were analyzed using an ANOVA table. The analysis found that 99.6% of the total variation was due to natural variation between the parts, not differences in the gage or appraisers. This indicates the gage system is acceptable for precisely measuring the characteristic.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Gage R&R

    Uploaded by

    Kevin Huynh
    9 views1 page
    The document summarizes the results of a gage repeatability and reproducibility study. The study measured a characteristic on 10 plastic tray parts using 3 appraisers over 3 trials each. The measurement results were analyzed using an ANOVA table. The analysis found that 99.6% of the total variation was due to natural variation between the parts, not differences in the gage or appraisers. This indicates the gage system is acceptable for precisely measuring the characteristic.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes the results of a gage repeatability and reproducibility study. The study measured a characteristic on 10 plastic tray parts using 3 appraisers over 3 trials each. The measurement results were analyzed using an ANOVA table. The analysis found that 99.6% of the total variation was due to natural variation between the parts, not differences in the gage or appraisers. This indicates the gage system is acceptable for precisely measuring the characteristic.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    9 views1 page

    Gage R&R

    Uploaded by

    Kevin Huynh
    The document summarizes the results of a gage repeatability and reproducibility study. The study measured a characteristic on 10 plastic tray parts using 3 appraisers over 3 trials each. The measurement results were analyzed using an ANOVA table. The analysis found that 99.6% of the total variation was due to natural variation between the parts, not differences in the gage or appraisers. This indicates the gage system is acceptable for precisely measuring the characteristic.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    GAGE REPEATABILITY AND REPRODUCIBILITY DATA SHEET

    ANOVA METHOD
    Part Number Gage Name Appraiser A
    PT00007902G Mitutoyo Venier Kevin
    Part Name Gage Number Appraiser B
    Plastic Tray-Retainer C-001 Suny
    Characteristic Specification Gage Type Appraiser C
    25 mm 24.50 25.50 Variable Pama
    Characteristic Classification Trials Parts Appraisers Date Performed
    ICL 3 10 3 July 22, 2022

    APPRAISER/ PART AVERAGE


    TRIAL # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    1. A 1 24.82 24.86 24.83 24.88 24.81 24.85 24.80 24.83 24.83 24.84 24.84
    2. 2 24.82 24.86 24.83 24.88 24.81 24.85 24.81 24.83 24.83 24.84 24.84
    3. 3 24.82 24.86 24.83 24.88 24.81 24.85 24.80 24.83 24.83 24.84 24.84
    4. AVE 24.82 24.86 24.83 24.88 24.81 24.85 24.80 24.83 24.83 24.84 xa= 24.84
    5. R 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 ra= 0.00
    6. B 1 24.82 24.86 24.83 24.88 24.81 24.85 24.80 24.83 24.83 24.84 24.84
    7. 2 24.82 24.86 24.83 24.88 24.81 24.85 24.80 24.83 24.83 24.84 24.84
    8. 3 24.83 24.86 24.83 24.88 24.81 24.85 24.80 24.83 24.83 24.84 24.84
    9. AVE 24.82 24.86 24.83 24.88 24.81 24.85 24.80 24.83 24.83 24.84 xb= 24.84
    10. R 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 rb= 0.00
    11. C 1 24.82 24.86 24.83 24.88 24.81 24.85 24.80 24.83 24.83 24.84 24.84
    12. 2 24.82 24.86 24.83 24.88 24.82 24.85 24.80 24.83 24.83 24.84 24.84
    13. 3 24.82 24.86 24.83 24.88 24.81 24.85 24.80 24.83 24.82 24.84 24.83
    14. AVE 24.82 24.86 24.83 24.88 24.81 24.85 24.80 24.83 24.83 24.84 xc= 24.84
    15. R 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 r c= 0.00
    16. PART X= 24.84
    AVERAGE 24.82 24.86 24.83 24.88 24.81 24.85 24.80 24.83 24.83 24.84 Rp= 0.08

    Anova Table
    Source DF SS MS F Sig
    Appraiser 2 0.00 0.00 0.25
    Parts 9 0.04 0.00 1102.25 *
    Appraiser-by-Part 18 0.00 0.00 1.08
    Equipment 60 0.00 0.00
    Total 89 0.04
    * Significant at α = 0.05 level

    Standard
    % Total Variation % Contribution % Tolerance
    Anova Report Deviation (σ)
    Repeatability (EV) 0.00 9.1% 0.8% 0.2%
    Reproducibility (AV) 0.00 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
    Appraiser by Part (INT) 0.00 0.8% 0.0% 0.0%
    GRR 0.00 9.1% 0.8% 0.2%
    Part-to-Part (PV) 0.02 99.6% 99.2% 2.3%
    Gage system O.K

    Note:
    Tolerance = 1.00 Total variation (TV) = 0.02
    Number of distinct data categories (ndc) = 15
    Gage discrimination acceptable

    You might also like