New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/372443542
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Star and Wheel By DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density
Preprint · July 2023

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8161878
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
527 PUBLICATIONS 25,757 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
On Algebraic Structures and Algebraic Hyperstructures View project
On Combinatorics View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 19 July 2023.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By DOMINATION 3
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density 4
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 ABSTRACT 8
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9
SuperHyperDOMINATION). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a pair 10
S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is 11
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION if the following expressions, terms and 12
statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION criteria holds. 13
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= 00
max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) | ∀Vi ∈ VN SHG , ∃Vj ∈ V 00 :
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
TV (Ei0 ) = min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) = min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
and FV0 (Ei0 ) = min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
}
In this scientific research, new configurations are introduced for the new 14
SuperHyperNotions, namely a DOMINATION and a Neutrosophic DOMINATION. 15
Two different SuperHyperDefinitions were started for them, but research has progressed 16
and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass are well-defined and 17
well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is implemented throughout this research. 18
To shine the light and importance of this research, a comparison between this 19
SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and basic SuperHyperNumbers is 20
presented. Definitions are followed by examples and examples, so clarifications are 21
guided by various tools. Applications are designed to understand the theoretical aspect 22
of this ongoing research. “Cancer diagnosis” are the things that are being researched to 23
explore the challenges that make sense in ongoing research and future research. It is a 24
special case. Cells are viewed in the intended manner. There are different types of them. 25
Some are individual and some are well modeled by groups of cells. All these types are 26
officially called “SuperHyperVertex”, but the relationships between them all are 27
officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. “SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic 28
SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and selected for research on “Cancer 29
Diagnosis”. Thus, these complex and dense super-hypermodels open avenues for 30
research on theoretical aspects and “cancer diagnosis”. Ways to pursue this scientific 31
research have been considered. It has also been formally collected in the form of several 32
questions and problems. It is useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of 33
DOMINATION. Since there are more ways to get type results a DOMINATION 34
becomes more understandable. In order to master the Neutrosophic DOMINATION, 35
there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “DOMINATION mastery”. 36
SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 37
method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Suppose a DOMINATION. If the 38
specified table contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and 39
hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is 40
redefined. ”values of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of 41
SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of 42
its vertices”, ”super edge values&max values of its vertices”, “super edge values” and 43
maximum values of its endpoints”. To get examples and structural examples, I would 44
like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on DOMINATION. 45
This is the original. Having the foundation of the previous definition in the 46
SuperHyperClass type would be disciplined. If there is a need to have all 47
DOMINATION until DOMINATION, then it is officially called “DOMINATION”, but 48
otherwise, it is not DOMINATION. There is some explanation for the original definition 49
titled “DOMINATION”. These two examples are further explored and distinguished 50
because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary methods based on a 51
dominant DOMINATION. Because of having DOMINATION, there is a need to 52
“re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic DOMINATION” and “neutrosophic 53
DOMINATION”. SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by 54
alphabetical labels. In this method, the position of tags is used to assign values. 55
Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is 56
redefined if the desired table exists. And if the desired table exists, a DOMINATION is 57
redefined to a “Neutrosophic DOMINATION”. It is useful to define a “Neutrosophic” 58
version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to obtain Neutrosophic type 59
results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic DOMINATION becomes more understandable. 60
Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a 61
number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, 62
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. 63
”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic 64
SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 65
SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is 66
SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges 67
elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number 68
of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one 69
SuperVertex as an intersection between two given SuperHyperEdges with two 70
exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an intersection between two 71
SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is SuperHyperStar and only one 72
SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. It is SuperHyperBipartite, 73
and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, 74
and these SuperVertices, which form two distinct sets, have no SuperHyperEdge in 75
common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is given as an 76
intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form 77
separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one SuperHyperEdge 78
among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a SuperVertex has a 79
SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel suggests specific 80
designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 81
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 82
the “special” cells and the “special group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 83
“SuperHyperVertices” and the common and desired properties between the “special” 84
cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 85
Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 86
of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 87
“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 88
of cancer” and the results and definitions will be introduced in redeemed methods. 89
Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. The specific region is assigned by the model 90
(called SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined 91
by this scientific research. Sometimes the movement of cancer is not easy to detect, 92
because there is certainty, uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects 93
of cancer on that area. This event leads us to choose another model [which is said to be 94
the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 95
happened and was done. There are some specific models, which are well known and 96
have names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The movements and 97
effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be 98
visualized with a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 99
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 100
the longest DOMINATION or the strongest DOMINATION in those Neutrosophic 101
SuperHyperModels. Some general results are presented for the longest DOMINATION 102
called DOMINATION and the strongest DOMINATION called Neutrosophic 103
DOMINATION. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have 104
only two SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at least three 105
SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of any cycle, 106
but literally, it is the transformation of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not 107
form. A basic introduction to the theory of DOMINATION Neutrosophic, 108
SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs is suggested. 109
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperDOMINATION, Cancer’s 110
Neutrosophic Recognition 111
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 112
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 113
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 114
In this scientific research, there are ideas in the prominent frameworks of motivations. I 115
try to bring motivations in narrative ways. Some Cells have faced attacks from the 116
established situation with cancer attacks in this case, there is some analysis embedded 117
in the case current situations where cells can be labeled as some groups and some 118
groups or individuals are overlabeled, all from behaviors to overcome cancer attacks. In 119
embedded situations, cell individuals and cell groups can be considered as “new groups”. 120
So it encourages us to find suitable SuperHyperModels for more appropriate analysis 121
about this dirty story. I found SuperHyperModels, officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” 122
and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, cells and groups of 123
cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and relationships between individual cells and 124
groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperEdges”. So this is another motivation for us 125
to do research on this SuperHyperModel based on “cancer diagnosis”. Sometimes, 126
things get worse. The situation has passed certainty and precise style. So it is beyond 127
them. There are three descriptions, i.e., degrees of determination, uncertainty, and 128
neutrality, for any object based on ambiguous forms, i.e., incomplete data, imprecise 129
data, and uncertain analysis. The second model can be considered in the previous 130
SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperGraph but officially 131
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Cancer is a disease, but the model is 132
supposed to understand what happens in this phenomenon. The special case of this 133
disease is considered and some parameters are used as consequences of the model. Cells 134
are attacked by the disease, but the movement of cancer is in a specific area. Knowing 135
the mind of cancer can help to find some cures for this disease. SuperHyperGraph and 136
Neutrosophic Super-HyperGraph are super-hypermodels used in “cancer diagnosis” and 137
both are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer 138
has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 139
SuperHyperModel proposes based on the links of cancer movements in the form of unity 140
styles with the formation of design and architecture officially called “DOMINATION”, 141
in the themes of specialized terms and common words. Particle for direct object. 142
Applied concepts under the investigation of the motivation of this scientific research. 143
The “SuperHyper” prefix refers to the theme of embedded styles for background 144
discovery for SuperHyperNotions. Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. The specific 145
region is assigned by the model (called SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of 146
movement of the cancer is determined by this scientific research. Sometimes the 147
movement of Cancer is not easy to identify because there is certainty, uncertainty and 148
neutrality about the movements and effects of Cancer in that region. This event leads 149
us to choose another model [said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph]. Easy 150
understanding of what happened and what was done. There are some specific models 151
that are well known and named and some general models. The movements and effects 152
of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be visualized by 153
a neurosophic superhyperpath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 154
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 155
DOMINATION or Neutrosophic DOMINATION for SuperHyperModels in it. Some 156
general results are presented. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic 157
SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at 158
least three SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of 159
cycle, but it is literally a form of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. 160
Question 2.1. How to define “SuperHyperNotions and to do research” to find the 161
“DOMINATION Rate” of any cell or groups of cells based on fixed cell or fixed group of 162
cells broadly, “DOMINATION Rate” based on fixed groups or fixed cells. Groups of 163
groups of cells? 164
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for “diagnosing cancer” in terms of 165
these chaotic and dense super-hypermodels in which embedded concepts are depicted? 166
This motivation to find concepts to use in this dense model is called 167
“SuperHyperGraphs”. So it motivates us to define different types of “DOMINATION” 168
and “neutrosophic DOMINATION” over “superhypergraph” and “neutrosophic 169
superhypergraph”. Then this scientific research has taken more motivations to define 170
SuperHyperClasses and find some connections among this SuperHyperNotion with other 171
SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to obtain examples and examples to clarify the 172
framework of this scientific research. The general results and some of the results about 173
some of the connections are the ways that the key point of this scientific research, 174
“diagnosis of cancer” is more understandable and clear. 175
The framework of this research is as follows. First, I will introduce the basic 176
definitions to clarify the basics. In the “Introductions” subsection, basic definitions 177
about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are introduced and 178
discussed in depth. Basic concepts are thoroughly explained and illustrated, and 179
sometimes a literature review is used to make sense of what is to come in the coming 180
sections. The main definitions and their explanations, along with some results on the 181
new concepts, DOMINATION and Neutrosophic DOMINATION, are specified in the 182
sections “DOMINATION” and “Neutrosophic DOMINATION”. In the concept of 183
dealing with results and in DOMINATION to create logic about the continuation of the 184
scientific research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform and Neutrosophic 185
SuperHyperUniform are introduced and as their consequences, the corresponding 186
SuperHyperClasses are specified to summarize the work done in this section, as “Results 187
on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. Going back 188
to the core concepts, clever steps towards common concepts to extend new concepts in 189
new frameworks, SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in “Results 190
on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” sections. 191
There is the initial scientific research on supergeneral relations and as the final and final 192
part of the theoretical scientific research is available in the section “General results”. 193
Some general SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and are known as fundamental 194
SuperHyperNotions, as in “General results” were extracted and discussed. 195
“DOMINATION”, “Neutrosophic DOMINATION”, “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and 196
“Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. There are curious questions about what 197
has been done about SuperHyperNotions to make sense of the superiority of this 198
scientific research and to discover the word “best” as a description and adjective of this 199
scientific research as presented in the “DOMINATION” section. The keyword of this 200
scientific research was presented in the section “Applications in cancer diagnosis” with 201
two cases and sub-sections “Case 1: Initial steps towards SuperHyperBipartite as 202
SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: Incremental steps towards SuperHyperMultiperdel as 203
SuperHyper. In the “open issues” section, there is a detailed examination and 204
recognition of what was done in this scientific research and what happened in this 205
scientific research in the form of “questions” and “issues” in order to understand this 206
scientific research in an outstanding style, the advantages and limitations of this 207
scientific research in addition to What has been done in this scientific research is stated 208
in the “conclusion and final remarks” section. 209
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 210
Research On the Redeemed Ways 211
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 212
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 213
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.5,p.2), 214
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 215
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 216
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 217
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [1],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 218
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 219
(Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 220
to Ref. [1]. 221
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 222
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 223
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.1,p.1). 224
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x; then the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 225
+
]− 0, 1 [. 226
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2). 227
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x. A single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by
truth-membership function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a
falsity-membership function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1].
A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,

indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [1],Definition 228
2.5,p.2). 229
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 230
pair S = (V, E), where 231
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 232
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 233
1, 2, . . . , n); 234
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 235
V; 236
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 237
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 238
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 239
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 240
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 241
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 242
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 243
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 244
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 245
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 246
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 247
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 248
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 249
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 250
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 251
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 252
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 253
Example 3.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 254
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 255
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 256
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 257
and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop 258
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus 259
in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 260
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 261
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 262
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 263
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 265
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a 266
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 267
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 268
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 269
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 270
• On the Figure (3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 271
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 272
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, 273
namely, E4 . 274
Figure 2. TThe Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModel-

ing on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 3. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 4. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
• On the Figure (4), there’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop 275
SuperHyperEdge on {F } and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on 276
{H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on {O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 277
• On the Figure (5),there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 278
SuperHyperEdge. 279
• On the Figure (6), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 280
SuperHyperEdge. 281
SuperHyperEdge. 283
SuperHyperEdge. 285
SuperHyperEdge. 287
SuperHyperEdge. 289
SuperHyperEdge. 291
SuperHyperEdge. 293
SuperHyperEdge. 295
SuperHyperEdge. 297
SuperHyperEdge. 299
Figure 5. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs mentioned as the SuperHy-

perModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 6. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 7. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs depicted SuperHyperMod-

eling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 8. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with dense SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 9. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a messy SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 10. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-embedding-

connected SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
Figure 11. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a SuperHyperModel-

Figure 12. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-multiple-

connected-style SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic
Example (3.6)


Figure 15. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with Linearly-Connected

SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)

Figure 17. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a Linearly-over-

packed SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
SuperHyperEdge. 301
SuperHyperEdge. 303
SuperHyperEdge. 305
SuperHyperEdge. 307
SuperHyperEdge. 309
SuperHyperEdge. 311
SuperHyperEdge. 313
Definition 3.7 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 314
(Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3). 315
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 316
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 317
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 318
characterized as follow-up items. 319
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 320
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 321





(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 322
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 323
HyperEdge; 324
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 325
SuperEdge; 326
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 327
SuperHyperEdge. 328
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 329
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 330
Definition 3.8 (t-norm). (Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3). 331
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 332
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 333
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 334
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 335
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 336
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 337
Definition 3.9. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.10. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.11. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 338
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 339
pair S = (V, E), where 340
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 341
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 342
1, 2, . . . , n); 343
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 344
V; 345
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 346
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 347
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 348
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 349
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 350
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 351
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 352
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 353
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 354
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 355
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 356
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 357
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 358
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 359
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 360
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 361
Definition 3.12 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 362
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 364
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 365
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 366
characterized as follow-up items. 367
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 368
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 369
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 370
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 371
HyperEdge; 372
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 373
SuperEdge; 374
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 375
SuperHyperEdge. 376
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 377
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 378
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 379
Definition 3.13. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 380
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 381
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 382
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 383
Definition 3.14. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 384
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 385
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 386
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 387
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 388
given SuperHyperEdges; 389
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 390
SuperHyperEdges; 391
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 392
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 393
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 394
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 395
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 396
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 397
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 398
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 399
common SuperVertex. 400
Example 3.15. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 401
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 402
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the notion. 403
Example 3.16. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 404
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 405
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is up. 406
Example 3.17. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 407
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 408
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 409
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 410
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is up. 411
Example 3.18. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 412
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 413
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 414
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 415
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 416
SuperHyperModel (26), is up. 417
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions in the Example

(3.15)
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

in the Neutrosophic Example (3.16)
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (3.17)
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Example (3.18)
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions in the

Example (3.19)
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (3.20)
Example 3.19. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 418
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 419
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 420
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 421
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 422
is up. 423
Example 3.20. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 424
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 425
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 426
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 427
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is up. 428
Definition 3.21. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)

S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 429
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 430
of following conditions hold: 431
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 432
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 433
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 434
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 435
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 436
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 437
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 438
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 439
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 440
0 0
Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 . 441
Definition 3.22. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 442
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 443
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 444
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 445
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 446
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 447
SuperHyperPath . 448
Definition 3.23 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 449
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 451
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 452
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 453
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 454
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 455
Definition 3.24 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 456
(NSHE)). (Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). 457
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 458
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 459
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 460
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 461
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 462
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 463
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 464
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 466
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 467
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 469
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 470
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 471
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 472
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 473
notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 474
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 475
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 476
Definition 3.25. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 477
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 478
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 479
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 480
understandable. 481
Definition 3.26. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 482
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 483
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , notion, SuperHyperStar, 484
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 485
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 486
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 487
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 488
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 489

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.26)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic notion. Since there’s 490
more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic notion more Neutrosophicly 491
understandable. 492
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 493
Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic notion”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 494
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 495
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 496
Definition 3.27. Assume a notion. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic notion if the 497
Table (3) holds. 498
Example 3.28. Referred to the Example (3.6), assume a Neutrosophic 499
SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures 500
in every Neutrosophic items. 501
SuperHyperGraph (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (4). 503
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
Vi (TVi , IVi , FVi ) Ei (TEi , IEi , FEi )
V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.03, 0.03, 0.03) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E3 (0, 0, 0)
- - E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0.08, 0.08, 0.08)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15)
V3 (0.05, 0.05, 0.05) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.12, 0.12, 0.12) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{F } (0.06, 0.06, 0.06) E5 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{H} (0.08, 0.08, 0.08) - -
{N } (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) - -
{O} (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) - -

4 Main Resultant 510
Definition 4.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 511
SuperHyperDOMINATION). 512
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 513
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 514
SuperHyperDOMINATION if the following expressions, terms and statements is called 515
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION criteria holds. 516
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) | ∀Vi ∈ VSHG , ∃Vj ∈ V 00 :
V SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
TV0 (Ei0 ) = min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

IV0 (Ei0 ) = min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
and FV0 (Ei0 ) = min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
}
Example 4.2. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 517
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 518
SuperHyperWheel (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (8). 520
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 521
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V3 , V6 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 522
SuperHyperDOMINATION since the following expressions, terms and statements is 523


Figure 32. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-











Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION criteria holds. 524
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V3 ,V6 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V3 ,V6 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V3 ,V6 }
= (0.52, 0.52, 0.52) =

X X X
= 00max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) | V1 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V6 ∈ V 00 :
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
TV (E1 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (V1 ), TV 0 (V6 )]V1 ,V6 ∈E1 ,
IV0 (E1 ) = 0.26 = min[IV 0 (V1 ), IV 0 (V6 )]V1 ,V6 ∈E1 ,
and FV0 (E1 ) = 0.26 = min[FV 0 (V1 ), FV 0 (V6 )]V1 ,V6 ∈E1 ,
,
V2 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V6 ∈ V 00 :
TV0 (E1 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (V2 ), TV 0 (V6 )]V2 ,V6 ∈E1 ,
,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V6 ∈ V 00 :
,
V4 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V6 ∈ V 00 :
,
V5 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V6 ∈ V 00 :
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V3 , V5 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 528

V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V3 ,V5 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V3 ,V5 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V3 ,V5 }
= (0.73, 0.73, 0.73) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
V2 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V3 ∈ V 00 :
,
V4 , V6 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V5 ∈ V 00 :
,
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V5 }. Then V 0 is called 534
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION since the following expressions, terms and 535
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V5 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V5 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V5 }
= (0.92, 0.92, 0.92) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
V4 , V6 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V5 ∈ V 00 :
,
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V5 , V7 }. Then V 0 is called 540
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V5 ,V7 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V5 ,V7 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V5 ,V7 }
= (1.15, 1.15, 1.15) =

X X X
= 00max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) | V4 , V6 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V5 ∈ V 00
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 }. Then V 0 is called 546
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 }
= (1.39, 1.39, 1.39) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
and FV0 (E3 ) = 0.23 = min[FV 0 (V4 ), FV 0 (V5 )]V4 ,V5 ∈E3
}
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 }. Then V 0 is called 552
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 }
= (1.65, 1.65, 1.65).
Example 4.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 555
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 556
SuperHyperStar (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (14). 558
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 559
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V2 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 560
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V2 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V2 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V2 }
= (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
V6 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V4 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V3 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V5 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 566
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 }
= (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V4 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V3 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V5 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 572
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 }
= (0.49, 0.49, 0.49) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V4 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V5 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 }. Then V 0 is called 578
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 }
= (0.72, 0.72, 0.72) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
,
V5 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 }. Then V 0 is called 584
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 }
= (0.95, 0.95, 0.95) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V2 ∈ V 00 :
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 }. Then V 0 is called 590
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 }
= (1.18, 1.18, 1.18) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
TV (E1 ) = 0.26 = min[TV (V7 ), TV (V2 )]V7 ,V2 ∈E1 ,
0 0

}
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 }. Then V 0 is called 596
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 }
= (1.41, 1.41, 1.41).
5 Main Result 599
Theorem 5.1. (Main Result and Main Theorem). 600
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar has the letter z. The notion on the 601
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel coincides. 602
Proof. 603
(i). Let 604
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
605
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 606
a new way to redefine as 607
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 608
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION. 609
The latter is straightforward. 610
(ii). Let 611
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
CEN T ER, E2∗
612
P :
E1∗ , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2∗ , CEN T ER
is a longest SuperHyperDOMINATION taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperWheel 613
ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 614

The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one Neutrosophic 617
SuperHyperDOMINATION. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions 618
based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION could be applied. The unique embedded 619
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION proposes some longest Neutrosophic 620
SuperHyperDOMINATION excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 621
straightforward. 622
Proposition 5.2. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The Neutrosophic
SuperHyperDOMINATION set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 623
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
624
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER


SuperHyperDOMINATION number is as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 635
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
636
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.4. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

SuperHyperDOMINATION set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 647
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
648
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.5. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

SuperHyperDOMINATION number is as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 654
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
655
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Definition 5.6. (Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Uniform Neutrosophic 661
SuperHyperStar). 662
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair of 663
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 664
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 665
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 666
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar. 667
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair 668
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 669
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 670
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 671
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel. 672
Proposition 5.7. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 673
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
674
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER


The Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION number is lower than as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 685
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
686
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.9. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 697
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
698
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.10. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION number is lower than as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 704
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
705
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.11. (Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Neutrosophic 711
SuperHyperWheel). 712
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume every 713
Neutrosophic CENTER has the letter maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic 714
SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same maximum letter, are in every 715
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION set. 716
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 717
every Neutrosophic CENTER has the letter maximum letter. Then the 718
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same maximum letter, are in 719
every Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION set. 720
Proof. 721
(i). Let 722
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
723
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

(ii). Let 729
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
730
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.12. (Embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Embedded 741
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar). 742
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 743
CENTER is in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION set. 744
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 745
CENTER is in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION set. 746
Proof. 747
(i). Let 748
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
749
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

(ii). Let 755
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
756
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

6 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 767
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 769
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 770
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 771
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 772
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 773
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 774
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 775
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 776
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 777
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 778
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 779
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 780
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 781
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 782
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 783
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 784
happened and what’s done. 785
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 786
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 787
Figure 42. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperDOMINATION
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 788
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 789
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperDOMINATION, SuperHyperStar, 790
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to 791
find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION or the Neutrosophic 792
SuperHyperDOMINATION in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. 793
7 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 794
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 795
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 796
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (42), the 797
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 798
featured. 799
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (42) and the Table (21), the Neutrosophic 800
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 801
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 802
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 803
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the 804
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (42), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION. 805
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
Figure 43. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION
8 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 806
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 807
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 808
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (43), the 809
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 810
Neutrosophic featured. 811
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (43) and the Table (22), the Neutrosophic 812
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 813
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 814
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 815
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 816
SuperHyperModel (43), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION. 817
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
9 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 818
Cancer is a neutrosophic disease, but the neutrosophic model is supposed to understand 820
what is going on in this neutrosophic phenomenon. The special case of neutrosophic 821
disease is considered and some parameters have been used as consequences of the model. 822
Cells are subject to attack by the disease, but the movements of the cancer in the 823
specific area is a matter of mind. Neutrosophic diagnosis of cancer can help in finding 824
some Neutrosophic cures for this Neutrosophic disease. 825
In the following, several Neutrosophic stages are designed for this disease. 826
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) Neutrosophic diagnosis of cancer in long-term 827
Neutrosophic performance. 828
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region is assigned by the Neutrosophic 829
model (called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph) and the long Neutrosophic cycle of 830
movement of cancer is identified by this scientific research. Sometimes the 831
movement of cancer is not easy to detect, because there is certainty, uncertainty 832
and neutrality about the movements and effects of cancer on that area. This event 833
leads us to choose another model [which is said to be the Neutrosophic 834
superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what happened and 835
was done. 836
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models that 837
are well known and have names and some general Neutrosophic models. Cancer 838
neurtosophic movements and effects in complex pathways and between complex 839
groups of cells can be visualized by a SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, 840
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, 841
SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find dominant neutrosophic DOMINATION 842
models or dominant sDOMINATION models. 843
10 Wondering Open Problems But As The 844
Directions To Forming The Motivations 845
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 846
The SuperHyperDOMINATION and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION are defined 847
on a real-world application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 848
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 849
recognitions? 850
Question 10.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperDOMINATION 851
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION? 852
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 853
compute them? 854
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 855
SuperHyperDOMINATION and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION? 856
Problem 10.5. The SuperHyperDOMINATION and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION 857
do a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and they’re based on 858
SuperHyperDOMINATION, are there else? 859
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 860
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 861
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 862
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 863
11 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 864
In this section, closing and concluding remarks are presented. The drawbacks of this 865
scientific research are shown. Some advantages and disadvantages of this scientific 866
research are highlighted. 867
This scientific research uses some approaches to further understand the Neutrosophic 868
SuperHyperGraphs. In this effort, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the 869
DOMINATION. For this reason, in the second definition, the original definition of the 870
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based on 871
the new Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph definition, the new SuperHyperNotion, 872
Neutrosophic DOMINATION, finds a suitable background to implement some results 873
on. Some SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses are the 874
subjects of this scientific research on modeling areas that are subject to cancer attacks 875
in order to recognize this disease as mentioned under the title “Cancer Diagnosis”. To 876
formalize the SuperHyperNotion, DOMINATION, SuperHyperClasses and new 877
SuperHyperClasses instances are introduced. Some general results are summarized in 878
the DOMINATION and Neutrosophic DOMINATION sections. Clarifications, examples, 879
and literature reviews go all the way. In this scientific research, the literature review has 880
met the lines containing concepts and results. SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 881
SuperHyperGraph are super-hypermodels in “cancer diagnosis” and both are the 882
foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer has occurred 883
in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 884
SuperHyperModel proposes SuperHyperNotions, formally called “DOMINATION”, 885
based on the connections of Cancer’s movements in the longest and strongest styles with 886
the formation of design and architecture, in terms of terms and whispering words. . The 887
“SuperHyper” prefix refers to the topic of embedded styles to explore the background of 888
SuperHyperNotions. In the table (23), the advantages and ways of this scientific
Table 23. A look at this scientific research and beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. DOMINATION
3. Neutrosophic DOMINATION 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. modeling cancer diagnoses
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
889
research are specified, pointed out and expressed. 890
12 Background 891
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this scientific research. In what 892
follows, there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 893
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “New Ideas In Recognition of 894
Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot” in Ref. [1] 895
by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 896
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms with 897
introducing used neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published 898
in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Current Trends in Mass Communication 899
(CTMC)” with ISO abbreviation “Curr Trends Mass Comm” in volume 2 and issue 1 900
with pages 32-55. 901
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 902
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 903
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 904
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 905
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 906
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 907
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 908
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 909
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 910
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 911
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 912
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s 913
Recognition and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and 914
Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [3] by Henry 915
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 916
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions 917
and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. It’s published in prestigious and fancy 918
journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 919
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 920
volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 921
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 922
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 923
SuperHyperNumbers. 924
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 925
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 926
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2023). 927
In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and 928
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using 929
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 930
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and 931
Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques 932
Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 6 with pages 221-307. The research article studies 933
deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 934
It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and 935
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 936
titled “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super 937
Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper 938
Classes” in Ref. [5] by Henry Garrett (2022). In this research article, a novel approach 939
is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on 940
fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of 941
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is 942
entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 943
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 944
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 946
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 947
SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled 948
“neutrosophic co-degree and neutrosophic degree alongside chromatic numbers in the 949
setting of some classes related to neutrosophic hypergraphs” in Ref. [6] by Henry 950
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 951
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms without 952
using neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 953
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Current Trends in Computer 954
Science Research (JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in 955
choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 957
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background. The research 958
article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic 959
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 960
background. In some articles are titled “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing 961
Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 962
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [7] by Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — 963
(Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett 964
(2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of Confrontation under 965
Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 966
in Ref. [9] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer 967
Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique 968
inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [10] by 969
Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 970
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), 971
“The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells Toward The 972
Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets 973
Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory 974
Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [12] by Henry 975
Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case 976
of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition 977
Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), 978
“Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic 979
Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in 980
Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the 981
Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 982
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed 983
SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 984
Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 985
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 986
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 987
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 988
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett 989
(2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well- 990
SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” in Ref. [19] by Henry Garrett 991
(2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 992
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 993
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) 994
SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions 995
And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [20] by Henry Garrett (2022), 996
“Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 997
To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [21] by 998
Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 999
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in Ref. [22] by 1000
Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1001
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph 1002
With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions And Related 1003
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1004
“SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With 1005
SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1006
“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 1007
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s 1008
Treatments” in Ref. [25] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating and 1009
SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 1010
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [26] by Henry Garrett 1011
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 1012
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [203] by Henry 1013
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 1014
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 1015
and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [204] by Henry Garrett 1016
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 1017
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels 1018
Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [205] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1019
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 1020
In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called 1021
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [206] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect 1022
Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding 1023
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [209] by 1024
Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1025
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 1026
SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [210] by Henry 1027
Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1028
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in 1029
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [213] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1030
“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel 1031
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [216] by Henry 1032
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1033
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1034
in Ref. [217] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 1035
Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1036
Ref. [218] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1037
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1038
Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [219] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1039
1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 1040
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [220] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1041
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1042
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [221] by Henry Garrett 1043
(2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 1044
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [232] by Henry 1045
Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1046
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic 1047
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [233] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [4–233], there 1048
are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 1049
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph alongside scientific research books 1050
at [234–363]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 1051
readers, 4728 and 5721 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [364, 365]. 1052
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1053
proposed as book in Ref. [364] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1054
Scholar and has more than 4728 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 1055
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 1056
of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 1057
SuperHyperGraph theory. 1058
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1059
proposed as book in Ref. [365] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1060
Scholar and has more than 5721 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 1061
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 1062
notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in 1063
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 1064
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 1065
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 1066
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 1067
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 1068
framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in 1069
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–233] 1070
alongside scientific research books at [234–363]. Two popular scientific research books 1071
in Scribd ,in the terms of high readers, 4728 and 5721 respectively, on neutrosophic 1072
science is on [364, 365]. 1073
References 1074
1. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 1075
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Curr Trends Mass Comm 1076
2(1) (2023) 32-55. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/new- 1077
ideas-in-recognition-of-cancer-and-neutrosophic-super-hypergraph-as-hyper- 1078
tool-on-super-toot.pdf) 1079
2. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 1080
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 1081
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 1082
(2023) 35-47. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/some- 1083
super-hyper-degrees-and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper- 1084
graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-alongside-a.pdf) 1085
3. Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 1086
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 1087
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 1088
(2023) 136-148. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/a- 1089
research-on-cancers-recognition-and-neutrosophic-super-hypergraph-by- 1090
eulerian-super-hyper-cycles-and-hamiltonian-sets-.pdf) 1091
4. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1092
SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1093
Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(6) 1094
(2023) 221-307. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access- 1095
articles/neutrosophic-1failed-superhyperforcing-in-the-superhyperfunction-to- 1096
use-neutrosophic-superhypergraphs-on-cancers-neutros.pdf) 1097
5. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Co-degree and Neutrosophic Degree alongside 1098
Chromatic Numbers in the Setting of Some Classes Related to Neutrosophic 1099
Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. (doi: 1100
10.33140/JCTCSR.02.01.04) 1101
6. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 1102
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 1103
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 1104
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 1105
7. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 1106
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1107
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1108
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1109
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 1110
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 1111
8. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 1112
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 1113
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1114
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 1115
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 1116
9. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1117
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1118
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 1119
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1120
10. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1121
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1122
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1123
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1124
11. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 1125
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1126
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 1127
12. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1128
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1129
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1130
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1131
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1132
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1133
13. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1134
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1135
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1136
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1137
14. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1138
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1139
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1140
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1141
15. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1142
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1143
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1144
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1145
16. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 1146
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1147
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1148
17. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 1149
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 1150
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 1151
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1152
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1154
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1155
19. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 1156
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1157
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1158
20. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1159
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1160
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1162
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1166
22. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1167
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1168
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1169
23. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1170
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1171
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1172
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1173
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1174
24. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1175
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 1176
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1177
25. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1178
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1179
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1180
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1181
26. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 1182
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 1183
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1184
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1185
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect Search As Hyper Perf On Super 1187
Perfidy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104836). 1188
28. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Perfidy By Hyper Perf Of 1189
SuperHyperPerfect Search In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1190
SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104857). 1191
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple 1193
On Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092796). 1194
30. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1195
Strict Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1196
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1199
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8088438). 1200
32. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Unequal 1201
Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1202
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1205
Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8084436). 1206
34. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Strict 1207
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Connective As Hyper Conceit On Super 1211
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080100). 1212
36. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse Strict 1213
Connective In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1214
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080068). 1215
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1217
Super Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8078445). 1218
38. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Unequal 1219
Connective Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1220
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1223
40. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Strict 1225
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1229
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8072171). 1230
42. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1231
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1235
44. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Equal 1237
SuperHyperGraph By Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1241
46. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Dimension 1243
Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1244
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1247
48. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse 1249
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1253
50. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Equal 1255
SuperHyperGraph By Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On Super 1259
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8051346). 1260
52. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Connective 1261
SuperHyperGraph By United Dominating As Hyper Ultra On Super Units”, 1265
54. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Units By Hyper Ultra Of United 1267
SuperHyperGraph By Zero Forcing As Hyper ford On Super forceps”, Zenodo 1271
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8017246). 1272
56. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super forceps By Hyper ford Of Zero Forcing In 1273
Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1274
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020128). 1275
SuperHyperGraph By Matrix-Based As Hyper mat On Super matte”, Zenodo 1277
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978571). 1278
58. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super mat By Hyper matte Of Matrix-Based In 1279
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1280
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978857). 1281
SuperHyperGraph By Dominating-Edges As Hyper Dome On Super Eddy”, 1283
60. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Dome Of 1285
Dominating-Edges In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1286
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Gap As Hyper Gape On Super Gab”, Zenodo 2023, 1289
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7916595). 1290
62. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gab By Hyper Gape Of Edge-Gap In 1291
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923632). 1293
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1295
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904698). 1296
64. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 1297
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1298
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1301
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1302
10.5281/zenodo.7904529). 1303
66. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 1304
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1305
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1306
10.5281/zenodo.7904401). 1307
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1309
Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7871026). 1310
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1312
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1315
Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1318
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1321
Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855661). 1322
Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1324
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1327
74. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 1329
Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1330
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1333
Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1336
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1339
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7839333). 1340
Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1342
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super 1345
EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7834229). 1346
Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1348
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1351
Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1354
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1357
Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1360
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1363
10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 1364
SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On 1366
Super initial EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365). 1367
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut On Super 1369
EULA-Path-Cut”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809358). 1370
Eulerian-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1372
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1375
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1378
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806767). 1379
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1381
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1384
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1385
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 1386
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1388
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 1389
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1391
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799902). 1392
95. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 1393
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1394
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1397
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1400
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793372). 1401
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1403
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7791952). 1404
Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1406
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1409
Hamiltonian-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1412
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1415
Hamiltonian-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1418
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, 1421
Hamiltonian-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1424
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1427
Trace-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1430
108. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 1432
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1433
Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7771831). 1434
Trace-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1436
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1439
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20913.25446). 1440
111. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 1441
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7764916). 1443
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1445
Edge-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1448
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1451
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.10089). 1452
Edge-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1454
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.34564). 1455
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Cut As Hyper Edify On Super Eddy”, ResearchGate 1457
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11377.76644). 1458
117. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 1459
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1460
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23750.96329). 1461
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1463
Vertex-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1466
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1469
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30212.81289). 1470
Vertex-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1472
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Cut As Hyper Vertu On Super Vertigo”, 1475
123. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 1477
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32467.25124). 1479
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1481
125. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1483
Stable-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1484
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Decompositions As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1487
127. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 1489
Stable-Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1490
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Cut As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1493
129. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 1495
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20170.24000). 1497
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Neighbors As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1499
131. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1501
Clique-Neighbors In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1502
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Decompositions As Hyper Decompile On Super 1505
Decommission”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18780.87683). 1506
Clique- Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1508
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Cut As Hyper Click On Super Cliche”, 1511
135. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 1513
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27392.30721). 1515
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy”, ResearchGate 1517
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321). 1518
SuperHyperGraph By List- Coloring As Hyper List On Super Lisle”, 1520
138. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 1522
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16356.04489). 1524
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark ”, ResearchGate 1526
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 1527
140. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 1528
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 1529
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 1530
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super 1532
Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 1533
142. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 1534
Edge-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1535
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, 1538
144. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 1540
Vertex-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1541
SuperHyperGraph By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super Returns”, 1544
146. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 1546
Tree-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1547
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, 1550
148. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 1552
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 1554
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On 1556
Super Waves”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 1557
150. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 1558
SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1559
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On 1562
Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 1563
152. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 1564
SuperHyperEdge-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1565
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super 1568
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 1569
154. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 1570
SuperHyperK-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1571
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 1574
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 1575
156. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 1576
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1577
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 1580
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 1581
158. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 1582
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1583
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 1586
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 1587
160. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 1588
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1589
161. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 1591
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1592
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 1595
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 1596
163. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 1597
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1598
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 1601
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 1602
165. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 1603
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1604
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 1607
167. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 1609
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1610
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, 1613
169. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 1615
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1616
170. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 1618
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1619
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, 1622
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 1625
173. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 1627
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1628
174. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 1630
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1631
175. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1633
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 1634
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 1635
176. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1636
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 1637
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 1638
177. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 1639
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1640
178. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 1642
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 1643
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 1644
179. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 1645
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1646
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 1647
180. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1648
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 1649
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1650
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 1651
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1654
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 1655
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1658
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 1659
183. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1660
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1662
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 1663
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1666
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 1667
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1670
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 1671
186. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 1672
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 1673
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1674
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 1675
187. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 1676
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 1677
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 1678
188. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 1679
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 1680
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 1681
189. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1682
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions 1683
of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 1684
190. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 1685
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 1686
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 1687
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 1688
191. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 1689
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 1690
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 1691
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 1692
192. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 1693
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 1694
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 1695
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1696
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 1697
193. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 1698
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 1699
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 1700
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1701
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 1702
194. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 1703
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 1704
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 1705
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 1706
195. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 1707
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1708
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 1709
196. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1710
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1711
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1713
197. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1714
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1715
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1716
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1717
198. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1718
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 1719
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 1720
199. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1721
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1722
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1723
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1724
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1725
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1726
200. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1727
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1728
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1729
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1730
201. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1731
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1732
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1733
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1734
202. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1735
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1736
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1737
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1738
203. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 1739
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 1740
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 1741
204. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 1742
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 1743
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 1744
205. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1746
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1747
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1748
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1749
206. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 1750
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 1751
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 1752
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 1753
207. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1754
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1755
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1756
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1757
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1759
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1760
209. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1761
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 1762
210. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1764
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 1765
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 1766
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1771
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1775
213. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1776
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1777
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 1778
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 1779
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1782
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1784
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1785
216. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 1786
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1787
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1790
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 1791
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1793
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 1794
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1797
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 1798
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1800
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 1801
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1804
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 1805
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1807
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1808
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 1810
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1815
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1816
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 1820
2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 1821
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1824
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 1827
228. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1828
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1829
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1830
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1831
229. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1832
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1833
in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1834
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 1835
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1838
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1839
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1842
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 1843
232. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 1844
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1845
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 1846
233. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1847
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 1848
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1849
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 1850
234. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect Search In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1851
Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104880). 1852
235. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. 1853
Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092816). 1854
236. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1855
Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8090194). 1856
237. Henry Garrett, “Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1857
238. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Connective In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1859
239. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1861
240. Henry Garrett, “Strict Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1863
241. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1865
242. Henry Garrett, “Equal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1867
243. Henry Garrett, “Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1869
244. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1871
245. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1873
246. Henry Garrett, “Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1875
247. Henry Garrett, “United Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1877
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8027488). 1878
248. Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1879
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020181). 1880
249. Henry Garrett, “Matrix-Based In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1881
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978921). 1882
250. Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1883
10.5281/zenodo.7943878). 1884
251. Henry Garrett, “Dominating-Edges In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1885
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7943871). 1886
252. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Gap In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1887
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923786). 1888
253. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1889
254. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 1891
255. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1893
256. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1895
257. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1897
258. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1899
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7854561). 1900
259. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1901
260. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1903
261. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1905
262. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1907
263. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1909
264. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1911
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812750). 1912
265. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1913
266. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 1915
267. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1917
268. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1919
269. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1921
270. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1923
271. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1925
272. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1927
273. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1929
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7783791). 1930
274. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1931
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7780123). 1932
275. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1933
276. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1935
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 1936
277. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1937
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7766174). 1938
278. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1939
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7762232). 1940
279. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1941
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7758601). 1942
280. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1943
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 1944
281. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1945
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7750995) . 1946
282. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1947
283. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1949
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7747236). 1950
284. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1951
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7742587). 1952
285. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1953
286. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1955
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7734719). 1956
287. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Neighbors In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1957
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730484). 1958
288. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1959
289. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1961
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7722865). 1962
290. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1963
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 1964
291. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1965
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 1966
292. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1967
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706415). 1968
293. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1969
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706063). 1970
294. Henry Garrett, “Tree-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1971
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7701906). 1972
295. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1973
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 1974
296. Henry Garrett, “(i,j)-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1975
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7694876). 1976
297. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1977
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7679410). 1978
298. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1979
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7675982). 1980
299. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1981
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7672388). 1982
300. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1983
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 1984
301. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1985
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 1986
302. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1987
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7659162). 1988
303. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1989
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 1990
304. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1991
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 1992
305. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1993
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 1994
306. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1995
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 1996
307. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1997
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 1998
308. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1999
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 2000
309. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2001
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 2002
310. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2003
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 2004
311. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2005
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 2006
312. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2007
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 2008
313. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2009
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 2010
314. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2011
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 2012
315. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2013
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 2014
316. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2015
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 2016
317. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2017
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 2018
318. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2019
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2020
319. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2021
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2022
320. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2023
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 2024
321. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2025
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2026
322. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2027
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2028
323. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2029
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2030
324. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2031
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 2032
325. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2033
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 2034
326. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2035
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 2036
327. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2037
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2038
328. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2039
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2040
329. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2041
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2042
330. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2043
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7557063). 2044
331. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2045
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 2046
332. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2047
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2048
333. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2049
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2050
334. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2051
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2052
335. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2053
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2054
336. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2055
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 2056
337. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2057
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 2058
338. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2059
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2060
339. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2061
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2062
340. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2063
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2064
341. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2065
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2066
342. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2067
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2068
343. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2069
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2070
344. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2071
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2072
345. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2073
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2074
346. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2075
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2076
347. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2077
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2078
348. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2079
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2080
349. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2081
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2082
350. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2083
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2084
351. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2085
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2086
352. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2087
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2088
353. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2089
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2090
354. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2091
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2092
355. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2093
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2094
356. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2095
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2096
357. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2097
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2098
358. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2099
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2100
359. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2101
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2102
360. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2103
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2104
361. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2105
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2106
362. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2107
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 2108
363. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2109
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 2110
364. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2111
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 2112
365. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2113
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 2114
View publication stats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Preprint · July 2023

527 PUBLICATIONS 25,757 CITATIONS

On Algebraic Structures and Algebraic Hyperstructures View project

On Combinatorics View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By DOMINATION 3

As Hyper Decoration On Super Density 4

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9

SuperHyperDOMINATION). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a pair 10

S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is 11

called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION if the following expressions, terms and 12

statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION criteria holds. 13

SuperHyperNotions, namely a DOMINATION and a Neutrosophic DOMINATION. 15

and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass are well-defined and 17

well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is implemented throughout this research. 18

SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and basic SuperHyperNumbers is 20

presented. Definitions are followed by examples and examples, so clarifications are 21

officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. “SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic 28

SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and selected for research on “Cancer 29

questions and problems. It is useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of 33

becomes more understandable. In order to master the Neutrosophic DOMINATION, 35

there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “DOMINATION mastery”. 36

SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 37

specified table contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and 39

hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is 40

redefined. ”values of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of 41

SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of 42

like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on DOMINATION. 45

SuperHyperClass type would be disciplined. If there is a need to have all 47

DOMINATION until DOMINATION, then it is officially called “DOMINATION”, but 48

because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary methods based on a 51

dominant DOMINATION. Because of having DOMINATION, there is a need to 52

“re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic DOMINATION” and “neutrosophic 53

DOMINATION”. SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by 54

Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is 56

redefined to a “Neutrosophic DOMINATION”. It is useful to define a “Neutrosophic” 58

results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic DOMINATION becomes more understandable. 60

Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a 61

number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, 62

SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. 63

”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic 64

SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 65

SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is 66

SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges 67

elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number 68

of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one 69

SuperVertex as an intersection between two given SuperHyperEdges with two 70

exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an intersection between two 71

SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is SuperHyperStar and only one 72

SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. It is SuperHyperBipartite, 73

common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is given as an 76

intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form 77

separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one SuperHyperEdge 78

among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a SuperVertex has a 79

SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel suggests specific 80

designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 81

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 82

cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 85