Pitek Emily Yahgan

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 20

DOI:

URL: https://religiondatabase.org/browse/637

Poll: Religious Group (v6) Published on: 14 November 2018

Yahgan
also known as “Yámana”

Data source: eHRAF


Secondary source
Entered by Emily Pitek, Human Relations Area Files
* Data Source entry, prepared based on data sourced from an external project.
* Secondary Source entry, prepared from a literature review by a Ph.D. RA

Entry tags: South American Religions, Religion

The Yahgan inhabit the southernmost point of South America, on the island of Tierra del Fuego. They
historically lived in small family groupings, which comprised the only form of social organization. Groups
were led by family heads and religious specialists called yékamuš (functioning as medicine men and
spiritual advisers). There was neither a ruler beyond the family unit, nor an official political leadership office.
Religious beliefs permeated many aspects of Yahgan life, so this entry considers the religious group to be
coterminous with the society at large. These religious beliefs centered around a supreme high god known
as Watauinewa, "master of the whole spirit world which was inhabited by a host of unseen and basically
malicious beings, such as ghosts (kushpig) of dead [yékamuš], and spirits of the sea, rocks, and trees"
(Beierle, 2003). Although the Yahgan have had contact with missionaries since 1871, there was minimal
Christian influence on the native religious system at the time this entry focuses on. This entry focuses on
the time of 1918-1924, when the principal ethnographer lived among and recorded information about the
Yahgan.

Date Range: 1900 CE - 1924 CE

Region: Tierra del Fuego, Chile

Region tags: South America, Chile

"The nineteenth century Yahgan occupied the


southern coast of the island of Tierra del Fuego from
approximately the eastern end of Beagle Channel to
Brecknock peninsula, encompassing the island south
of this line to Cape Horn" (Beierle, 2003).

Status of Participants:
✓ Religious Specialists ✓ Non-elite (common people, general populace)

Sources
Print sources for understanding this subject:
— Source 1: Divale, W. 2004. Codebook of Variables for the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample. World Cultures:
The Journal of Cross-Cultural and Comparative Research.

Online sources for understanding this subject:


— Source 1 URL: http://ehrafworldcultures.yale.edu/document?id=sh06-000

— Source 1 Description: Beierle, J. (2003). Culture Summary: Yahgan. New Haven, Conn.: HRAF.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Please see our Terms of Use here: Page 1 of 20
Attribution 4.0 International license. https://religiondatabase.org/about/credits

© 2019 Database of Religious History. For any questions contact


The University of British Columbia. project.manager@religiondatabase.org
— Source 2 URL: http://ehrafworldcultures.yale.edu/document?id=sh06-001

— Source 2 Description: Gusinde, M., & Schütze, F. (1937). Yahgan: The Life And Thought Of The Water
Nomads Of Cape Horn. Die Feuerland-Indianer [The Fuegian Indians]. Mödling Bei Wein: Anthropos-
Bibliothek.

— Source 3 URL: http://ehrafworldcultures.yale.edu/document?id=sh06-003

— Source 3 Description: Lothrop, S. K. (1928). Indians Of Tierra Del Fuego. New York: Museum of the
American Indian, Heye Foundation.

General Variables
Membership/Group Interactions

Are other religious groups in cultural contact with target religion:


— Yes
Notes: "First European contacts with the Yahgan may have taken place as early as 1520 when
Ferdinand Magellan encountered some of them around the straits which now bear his name, but
apparently there was little if any interaction with these people at that time. The first real contacts with
the Yahgan occurred in 1624 when Jacques L' Hermite actually visited and described these people... In
1871 the missionary Thomas Bridges and his family arrived in the area to set up a mission station at
Ushuaia, a site located on Beagle Channel on the south coast of Tierra del Fuego" (Beierle, 2003).

Is the cultural contact competitive:


— I don't know

Is the cultural contact accommodating/pluralistic:


— I don't know

Is the cultural contact neutral:


— Yes
Notes: Although the Yahgan have had contact with missionaries beginning in 1871, the only
Christian influence appears to have been on burial practices. As a result of this influence, the
Yahgan perform burials in place of cremation. (See Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1048).

Is there violent conflict (within sample region):


— Yes
Notes: SCCS Variable 1649, Frequency of Internal Warfare (Resolved Rating), indicates that
internal warfare seems to occur between one every 3 to 10 years, and once every 2 years
(original code 2.75) (Ember and Ember, 1992; Retrieved from Divale, 2004).

Is there violent conflict (with groups outside the sample region):


— Yes

Pitek, Database of Religious History, 2019 Page 2 of 20


Notes: SCCS Variable 1650, Frequency of External Warfare (Resolved Rating), indicates that
"external warfare seems to occur once every 3 to 10 years" (Ember and Ember, 1992; Retrieved
from Divale, 2004).

Does the religious group have a general process/system for assigning religious affiliation:
— No
Notes: Because the religious group is coterminous with the society at large, there is no concept of
assigning religious affiliation other than being born into a particular family unit.

Does the religious group actively proselytize and recruit new members:
— No
Notes: Because the religious group is coterminous with the society at large, there is no concept of
recruiting new members.

Does the religion have official political support


Answer 'yes' also in cases where the religious and political spheres are not distinguished from one
another, but the religious group's activities are tied up with, and supported by, the functioning of the
society at large.

— No
Notes: There is no official political leadership among the Yahgan; individual family groups are the only
level of hierarchy in the society. Additionally, "...there was neither established religious dogma nor a
formal body of beliefs" (Beierle, 2003). However, religious beliefs are tied up with the functioning of
society in numerous aspects, making the religious group coterminous with the society at large.

Is there a conception of apostasy in the religious group:


— No
Notes: Because the religious group is coterminous with the society at large, there is no concept of
apostasy.

Size and Structure

Number of adherents of religious group within sample region (estimated population,


numerical):
— Estimated population, numeric: 2900

Notes: Lothrop, 1928:25

Number of adherents of religious group within sample region (% of sample region


population, numerical):
— Estimated population, percentage of sample region: 100

Notes: Because the religious group is considered coterminous with the society at large, all members of
the society belong to the religious group.

Pitek, Database of Religious History, 2019 Page 3 of 20


Are there recognized leaders in the religious group:
— No
Notes: "The amazing simplicity revealed in the Yamana way of life is, naturally, also apparent in the
religious realm. Except for specific prayer formulas, their outward religious activity is remarkably
limited. They have no actual portrayal of their Supreme Being or particular places reserved for his
worship, nor do they have any kind of sacrifice. A priesthood and religious ceremonies are also lacking"
(Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:976). "Actually, conditions in the simple social organization of our Fuegians
are more orderly, principled, and peaceful than many Europeans might believe, although they neither
have a police force and courts of justice nor are under the leadership of chiefs" (Gusinde and Schütze,
1937:1031). Religious specialists, called yékamuš, are present and act as medicine men/spiritual
advisers. Yékamuš are "believed to have considerable influence upon natural forces" (Gusinde and
Schütze, 1937:1298). They are called to the position by a spirit (ibid, pg.1313), and taught by experienced
elders. The yékamuš are not united as a group or in society-each acts independently and with
superiority within an individual family grouping (ibid, pg. 1301). The yékamuš have no legal distinction,
and act to help with illness, protect against malevolent forces, and support the overall well-being of
the family group.

Scripture

Does the religious group have scriptures:


Scripture is a generic term used to designate revered texts that are considered particularly authoritative
and sacred relative to other texts. Strictly speaking, it refers to written texts, but there are also “oral
scriptures” (e.g. the Vedas of India).

— No
Notes: No ethnographic evidence indicating the presence of scriptures. Additionally, "...there was
neither established religious dogma nor a formal body of beliefs" (Beierle, 2003).

Architecture, Geography

Is monumental religious architecture present:


— No
Notes: "The amazing simplicity revealed in the Yamana way of life is, naturally, also apparent in the
religious realm. Except for specific prayer formulas, their outward religious activity is remarkably
limited. They have no actual portrayal of their Supreme Being or particular places reserved for his
worship, nor do they have any kind of sacrifice" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:976).

Are there different types of religious monumental architecture:


— No
Notes: "The amazing simplicity revealed in the Yamana way of life is, naturally, also apparent in the
religious realm. Except for specific prayer formulas, their outward religious activity is remarkably
limited. They have no actual portrayal of their Supreme Being or particular places reserved for his
worship, nor do they have any kind of sacrifice" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:976).

Beliefs

Pitek, Database of Religious History, 2019 Page 4 of 20


Burial and Afterlife

Is a spirit-body distinction present:


Answer “no” only if personhood (or consciousness) is extinguished with death of the physical body.
Answering yes does not necessarily imply the existence of Cartesian mind/body dualism, merely that
some element of personhood (or consciousness) survives the death of the body.

— Yes
Notes: "Conceptions of the human soul and of its continued life after death are closely interwoven, and
the customs of mourning, for which our Yamana have created definite forms, are connected with the,"
(Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1032).

Spirit-mind is conceived of as having qualitatively different powers or properties than


other body parts:
— Yes
Notes: "[The Yahgan's] idea of life and of being alive coincides with the possession of a soul. The
soul is the true principle of life and, as such, it may exist by itself or be united with the human
body. Hence, according to the clear conception of the Yamana, it is a being in itself, and thus
something entirely different from a body" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1033).

Spirit-mind is conceived of as non-material, ontologically distinct from body:


— Yes
Notes: (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1033)

Belief in afterlife:
— Yes
Notes: "The Fuegians do not waver in the one assertion that at death the [soul] leaves the body and
continues a life of its own. Once soul and body have been separated by death, that is, as was said on
page 1034, by the intervention of Watauinewa, any subsequent union is forever excluded. After that
the soul stands alone, whereas the corpse decays" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1036).

Is the spatial location of the afterlife specified or described by the religious group:
— No
Notes: "It must be admitted, however, that they do not conceive of the other world as a secure
situation or a definite place" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1036).

Reincarnation in this world:


— No
Notes: No ethnographic evidence for the presence of a belief in reincarnation.

Are there special treatments for adherents' corpses:


— Yes

Pitek, Database of Religious History, 2019 Page 5 of 20


Notes: Formerly, cremation was the most commonly used method for treating corpses. As a result of
Christian influence, burial is the most commonly used method for treating corpses at the time this
entry focuses on. See questions below for more details.

Cremation:
— Yes
Notes: "This happens in any case; 'the dead are always...wrapt up in skins either when buried or
burned' /cited in English/, as Bridges (a):206 confirms. Nowadays the body is straightened out
and the arms are placed at the sides, because burial in the ground is now the exclusive
custom" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1047).
Specific to this answer:
Date Range: 1800 CE - 1900 CE

Mummification:
— No
Notes: No ethnographic evidence for the presence of mummification.

Interment:
— Yes

Corpse is flexed (legs are bent or body is crouched):


— No

Corpse is extended (lying flat on front or back):


— Yes
Notes: "Nowadays the body is straightened out and the arms are placed at the sides,
because burial in the ground is now the exclusive custom" (Gusinde and Schütze,
1937:1047).

Cannibalism:
— No
Notes: "Even the young Bridges (a):207 came across traces of this belief: 'Cannibalism is
unknown, but they have reports that it is practised by some people far to the westward, whom
they call Hapúnanóoshiaúla' /cited in English/" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1161).

Exposure to elements (e.g. air drying):


— No
Notes: No ethnographic evidence for the presence of exposing corpses to the elements.

Feeding to animals:

Pitek, Database of Religious History, 2019 Page 6 of 20


— No
Notes: No ethnographic evidence indicating the presence of feeding corpses to animals.

Secondary burial:
— Yes
Notes: SCCS Variable 1850, Secondary Bone/Body Treatment: Original Scale, indicates that
secondary burial is present (Schroeder, 2001; Retrieved from Divale, 2004).

Are co-sacrifices present in tomb/burial:


— No
Notes: No ethnographic evidence for the presence of co-sacrifices.

Are grave goods present:


— No
Notes: "...it has been customary from ancient times to destroy all the possessions of the deceased, by
consigning them to the flames, throwing them into the sea, or placing the individual pieces in the
grave with the corpse...These things are in no way meant as actual burial accessories; the survivors are
guided solely by the desire to destroy in one way or another everything that belonged to the
deceased" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1054).

Are formal burials present:


— Yes
Notes: See questions below for more details. Additionally, see Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1047-1056 for
a full description of burial practices.

As cenotaphs:
— No

In cemetery:
— No

Family tomb-crypt:
— No

Other formal burial type:


— Yes [specify]: unmarked graves close to the hut

Notes: Burials take place "not far from the hut" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1052). The Yahgan
"prefer to bury the corpse in a sandbank lying off the shore or in a low hill of coarse gravel...the
spot is made to look exactly like the surroundings so as to be unrecognizable" (ibid, pg.1053).

Pitek, Database of Religious History, 2019 Page 7 of 20


Supernatural Beings

Are supernatural beings present:


— Yes
Notes: A supreme high god as well as water spirits (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1167), forest giants
(Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1171), and guardian spirits (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1180) are present.

A supreme high god is present:


— Yes
Notes: "Much of the religious life of the Yahgan centered on shamanism and theism (the belief
in a supreme being called WATAUINÉWA)..." (Beierle, 2003).

The supreme high god is anthropomorphic:


— Field doesn't know
Notes: "Since he is incorporeal, no one has a perceptual idea of his person...There are no
pictorial or material representations of his person" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:968).

The supreme high god is a sky deity:


— Yes
Notes: "His abode is always far away from the earth and, in the invariable phrase, 'high
up there' in space" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:969).

The supreme high god is chthonic (of the underworld):


— No
Notes: "His abode is always far away from the earth and, in the invariable phrase, 'high
up there' in space" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:969).

The supreme high god is fused with the monarch (king=high god):
— No
Notes: There is no monarch or high ruler among the Yahgan.

The monarch is seen as a manifestation or emanation of the high god:


— No
Notes: There is no monarch or high ruler among the Yahgan.

The supreme high god is a kin relation to elites:


— No
Notes: There is no elite class among the Yahgan.

Pitek, Database of Religious History, 2019 Page 8 of 20


The supreme high god has another type of loyalty-connection to elites:
— No
Notes: There is no elite class among the Yahgan.

The supreme high god is unquestionably good:


— I don't know
Notes: "Despite the decided arbitrariness with which Watauinewa now and then
obviously interferes with the fate of individual human beings, he is generally regarded
as benevolent and good" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:974).

The supreme high god has knowledge of this world:


— Yes

The supreme high god can see you everywhere (in the dark, at home):
— Yes

Notes: "...he is described as omniscient, so to speak. 'He sees everything. — He


knows what everyone is doing. — He also observes how a person behaves in
secret [unobserved by his countrymen]!'" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:969).

The supreme high god knows what will happen to you, what you will do
(future sight):
— Yes
Notes: "...Watauinewa also holds the fate of men in his hands" (Gusinde and
Schütze, 1937:971).

The supreme high god has deliberate causal efficacy in the world:
— Yes
Notes: "Moral duties with their compulsory demands are not suspended in mid-air, but,
as has just been said, rest on a firm foundation, from which the sanctions for either a
dutiful or a faulty act derive their effectiveness. The Yamana definitely express their
conviction that Watauinewa sees to it that his rules are observed and that he punishes
serious transgressions" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1030).

The supreme high god can punish:


— Yes
Notes: "Moral duties with their compulsory demands are not suspended in
mid-air, but, as has just been said, rest on a firm foundation, from which the
sanctions for either a dutiful or a faulty act derive their effectiveness. The
Yamana definitely express their conviction that Watauinewa sees to it that his
rules are observed and that he punishes serious transgressions" (Gusinde and
Schütze, 1937:1030).

Pitek, Database of Religious History, 2019 Page 9 of 20


The supreme high god has indirect causal efficacy in the world:
"Indirect causal efficacy" refers to not being seen as consciously, directly and actively
intervening in the human world, but their overall well being or general attitude has
effects on, e.g., quality of harvest, success in war, health, etc.

— Yes
Notes: "In the same manner he bestows good and bad weather. If he wants to chastise
someone, he has him tormented by storm and rain; if he favors someone, he will let
him be accompanied by sunshine. He brings success in hunting to the men and
success in gathering to the women, but sometimes he also arranges that they both
come back empty-handed" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:970).

The supreme high god exhibits positive emotion:


— Yes
Notes: "Despite the decided arbitrariness with which Watauinewa now and then
obviously interferes with the fate of individual human beings, he is generally regarded
as benevolent and good" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:974).

The supreme high god possesses hunger:


— Field doesn't know
Notes: "The Yamana have no conception whatever of how Watauinewa actually lives —
that is to say, his dwelling, food, weariness, sleep, etc. — and they have nothing to say
on the subject. They definitely know that he has a very unique manner of existence;
this is enough for them and they have no desire to find out about details" (Gusinde and
Schütze, 1937:975).

The supreme high god communicates with the living:


— I don't know

Previously human spirits are present:


— I don't know
Notes: The Yahgan believe in previously human spirits in the sense that they believe in the
survival of the soul after death. However, no one knows what happens to the soul after death,
so there is not an extensive belief in previously human spirits. See Gusinde and Schütze,
1937:1038.

Non-human supernatural beings are present:


— Yes
Notes: Water spirits (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1167), forest giants (Gusinde and Schütze,
1937:1171), and guardian spirits (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1180) are present. These beings do
not play a significant role in the religious beliefs of the Yahgan, so limited details on their
character are present.

Pitek, Database of Religious History, 2019 Page 10 of 20


These supernatural beings can be seen:
— I don't know

These supernatural beings can be physically felt:


— I don't know

Non-human supernatural beings have knowledge of this world:


— I don't know

Non-human supernatural beings have deliberate causal efficacy in the world:


— I don't know

These supernatural beings have indirect causal efficacy in the world:


"Indirect causal efficacy" refers to not being seen as consciously, directly and actively
intervening in the human world, but their overall well being or general attitude has
effects on, e.g., quality of harvest, success in war, health, etc.

— Yes
Notes: "He [the water spirit Lak□ma] does not merely attack a canoe and its
occupants. It is also within his power to cause high waves and threatening storms if he
wants to endanger a vessel" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1167).

These supernatural beings exhibit positive emotion:


— I don't know

These supernatural beings exhibit negative emotion:


— I don't know

These supernatural beings possess hunger:


— I don't know

Supernatural Monitoring

Is supernatural monitoring present:


This refers to surveillance by supernatural beings of humans’ behaviour and/or thought particularly as it
relates to social norms or potential norm violations.

— Yes
Notes: "One could probably describe as religious activity in its wider sense the firmly established,
equable mental attitude of deep veneration toward Watauinewa that the individual maintains. Not
everyone is always conscious of it, but in some way it has a decisive influence on him to move along

Pitek, Database of Religious History, 2019 Page 11 of 20


certain paths and to be led by universally valid principles. In its effect within the religious sphere this
veneration is comparable to what a conscience is in the field of moral obligations, namely, a sort of
leitmotiv by which the individual person is led. This mental attitude is the reason for the unchanging
acquiescence of the Fuegian to the demands of the moral law. He submits to it without contradiction,
although he cannot explain it in any other way than by repeating the well-known saying: 'Watauinewa
sees everything. — He wants everyone to conduct himself in the way that has always been customary
among us Yamana!'" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:977).

There is supernatural monitoring of prosocial norm adherence in particular:


Prosocial norms are norms that enhance cooperation among members of the group, including
obviously “moral” or “ethical” norms, but also extending to norms concerning honouring contracts
and oaths, providing hospitality, coming to mutual aid in emergencies, etc.

— Yes
Notes: "The [moral] laws that our Yamana observe are clear and easy to understand, simple
and definite. They are headed by duties toward the Supreme Being. After all, these duties in
their entirety are derived from him as originator, and he carefully sees to it that they are
carried out" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1024).

Do supernatural beings mete out punishment:


— Yes
Notes: "Moral duties with their compulsory demands are not suspended in mid-air, but, as has just
been said, rest on a firm foundation, from which the sanctions for either a dutiful or a faulty act derive
their effectiveness. The Yamana definitely express their conviction that Watauinewa sees to it that his
rules are observed and that he punishes serious transgressions" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1030).

Is the cause or agent of supernatural punishment known:


— Yes
Notes: The ethnographic examples of supernatural punishment describe only the high god,
Watauinewa, as the agent of such punishment.

Done only by high god:


— Yes
Notes: The ethnographic examples of supernatural punishment describe only the high
god, Watauinewa, as the agent of such punishment.

Done by many supernatural beings:


— No
Notes: The ethnographic examples of supernatural punishment describe only the high
god, Watauinewa, as the agent of such punishment.

Done through impersonal cause-effect principle:


— No

Pitek, Database of Religious History, 2019 Page 12 of 20


Is the reason for supernatural punishment known:
— Yes

Done to enforce group norms:


— Yes
Notes: "Moral duties with their compulsory demands are not suspended in mid-air, but,
as has just been said, rest on a firm foundation, from which the sanctions for either a
dutiful or a faulty act derive their effectiveness. The Yamana definitely express their
conviction that Watauinewa sees to it that his rules are observed and that he punishes
serious transgressions" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1030).

Supernatural punishments are meted out in the afterlife:


— Field doesn't know
Notes: "No one, however, speaks of punishment which the culprit is to expect in the other
world because in general the Yamana maintain that they do not know what form of existence
the soul has there" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1030).

Supernatural punishments are meted out in this lifetime:


— Yes
Notes: See questions below for more details.

Punishment in this life consists of crop failure or bad weather:


— Yes
Notes: "If he wants to chastise someone, he has him tormented by storm and rain; if he
favors someone, he will let him be accompanied by sunshine. He brings success in
hunting to the men and success in gathering to the women, but sometimes he also
arranges that they both come back empty-handed" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:970).

Punishment in this life consists of sickness or illness:


— Yes
Notes: "By way of punishment he (the high god Watauinewa) sends a serious illness; he
liberates a person from it, but only occasionally" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:970).

Do supernatural beings bestow rewards:


— I don't know
Notes: Insufficient ethnographic evidence.

Messianism/Eschatology

Are messianic beliefs present:

Pitek, Database of Religious History, 2019 Page 13 of 20


— No
Notes: No ethnographic evidence for the presence of messianic beliefs.

Is an eschatology present:
— No
Notes: No ethnographic evidence for the presence of an eschatology.

Norms and Moral Realism

Are general social norms prescribed by the religious group:


— Yes
Notes: "The social life of our Fuegians and the behavior of individuals, regardless of age and sex, are
regulated by definite, unchanging principles that obligate all tribal members without exception. They
alone assure the tranquil continuance of the tribal society and guarantee peaceful coexistence for all
its parts" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1022).

Is there a conventional vs. moral distinction in the religious group:


— Yes
Notes: "One could probably describe as religious activity in its wider sense the firmly established,
equable mental attitude of deep veneration toward Watauinewa that the individual maintains. Not
everyone is always conscious of it, but in some way it has a decisive influence on him to move along
certain paths and to be led by universally valid principles. In its effect within the religious sphere this
veneration is comparable to what a conscience is in the field of moral obligations, namely, a sort of
leitmotiv by which the individual person is led. This mental attitude is the reason for the unchanging
acquiescence of the Fuegian to the demands of the moral law. He submits to it without contradiction,
although he cannot explain it in any other way than by repeating the well-known saying: 'Watauinewa
sees everything. — He wants everyone to conduct himself in the way that has always been customary
among us Yamana!'" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:977).

Are specifically moral norms prescribed by the religious group:


— Yes
Notes: "The laws that our Yamana observe are clear and easy to understand, simple and
definite. They are headed by duties toward the Supreme Being. After all, these duties in their
entirety are derived from him as originator, and he carefully sees to it that they are carried out"
(Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1024).

Specifically moral norms are linked to impersonal cosmic order (e.g. karma):
— No

Specifically moral norms are linked in some way to an anthropomorphic


being:
— Yes

Pitek, Database of Religious History, 2019 Page 14 of 20


Notes: "The laws that our Yamana observe are clear and easy to understand, simple
and definite. They are headed by duties toward the Supreme Being. After all, these
duties in their entirety are derived from him as originator, and he carefully sees to it
that they are carried out" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1024).

Specifically moral norms are have no special connection to metaphysical:


— No

Moral norms apply to:


— All individuals within society

Notes: "The social life of our Fuegians and the behavior of individuals, regardless of age and sex,
are regulated by definite, unchanging principles that obligate all tribal members without
exception" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1022).

Are there centrally important virtues advocated by the religious group:


Virtues here are normatively-desirable, internalized habits, dispositions or behavioral ideals.

— Yes
Notes: See below for particular virtues emphasized by the Yahgan.

Selflessness / selfless giving:


— Yes
Notes: "Diligence and industry, a sense of order and cleanliness, compatability and a quiet
nature, unselfishness and constant willingness to help, moderation in eating, and respect for
tribal custom in its many details are qualities which the society as a whole expects from each
of its members" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1025). "Personal unselfishness and constant
helpfulness, which are regarded as the chief virtues..." (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1026).

Respectfulness / courtesy:
— Yes
Notes: "Diligence and industry, a sense of order and cleanliness, compatability and a quiet
nature, unselfishness and constant willingness to help, moderation in eating, and respect for
tribal custom in its many details are qualities which the society as a whole expects from each
of its members" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1025).

Moderation / frugality:
— Yes
Notes: "Diligence and industry, a sense of order and cleanliness, compatability and a quiet
nature, unselfishness and constant willingness to help, moderation in eating, and respect for
tribal custom in its many details are qualities which the society as a whole expects from each
of its members. Their sense of modesty is well developed" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1025).

Pitek, Database of Religious History, 2019 Page 15 of 20


Diligence / self-discipline / excellence:
— Yes
Notes: "Diligence and industry, a sense of order and cleanliness, compatability and a quiet
nature, unselfishness and constant willingness to help, moderation in eating, and respect for
tribal custom in its many details are qualities which the society as a whole expects from each
of its members" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1025).

Cleanliness (physical) / orderliness:


— Yes
Notes: "Diligence and industry, a sense of order and cleanliness, compatability and a quiet
nature, unselfishness and constant willingness to help, moderation in eating, and respect for
tribal custom in its many details are qualities which the society as a whole expects from each
of its members" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1025).

Practices
Membership Costs and Practices

Does membership in this religious group require celibacy (full sexual abstinence):
— No
Notes: No ethnographic evidence indicating the requirement of celibacy.

Does membership in this religious group require castration:


— No
Notes: No ethnographic evidence indicating the requirement of castration.

Does membership in this religious group require fasting:


— Yes
Notes: Fasting is required in preparation for initiation rites (see Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:645-647).

Does membership in this religious group require sacrifice of adults:


"Adults" here referring to an emic or indigenous category; if that category is different from the popular
Western definition of a human who is 18-years-old or older and who is legally responsible for his/her
actions, then please specify that difference in the Comments/Sources: box below.

— No
Notes: "The amazing simplicity revealed in the Yamana way of life is, naturally, also apparent in the
religious realm. Except for specific prayer formulas, their outward religious activity is remarkably
limited. They have no actual portrayal of their Supreme Being or particular places reserved for his
worship, nor do they have any kind of sacrifice" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:976).

Does membership in this religious group require sacrifice of children:

Pitek, Database of Religious History, 2019 Page 16 of 20


"Children" here referring to an emic or indigenous category; if that category is different from the popular
Western definition, please specify that different in the Comments/Sources: box below.

— No
Notes: "The amazing simplicity revealed in the Yamana way of life is, naturally, also apparent in the
religious realm. Except for specific prayer formulas, their outward religious activity is remarkably
limited. They have no actual portrayal of their Supreme Being or particular places reserved for his
worship, nor do they have any kind of sacrifice" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:976).

Does membership in this religious group require self-sacrifice (suicide):


— No
Notes: "The amazing simplicity revealed in the Yamana way of life is, naturally, also apparent in the
religious realm. Except for specific prayer formulas, their outward religious activity is remarkably
limited. They have no actual portrayal of their Supreme Being or particular places reserved for his
worship, nor do they have any kind of sacrifice" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:976).

Does membership in this religious group require sacrifice of property/valuable items:


— No
Notes: "The amazing simplicity revealed in the Yamana way of life is, naturally, also apparent in the
religious realm. Except for specific prayer formulas, their outward religious activity is remarkably
limited. They have no actual portrayal of their Supreme Being or particular places reserved for his
worship, nor do they have any kind of sacrifice" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:976).

Does membership in this religious group require sacrifice of time (e.g., attendance at
meetings or services, regular prayer, etc.):
— No
Notes: "The amazing simplicity revealed in the Yamana way of life is, naturally, also apparent in the
religious realm. Except for specific prayer formulas, their outward religious activity is remarkably
limited. They have no actual portrayal of their Supreme Being or particular places reserved for his
worship, nor do they have any kind of sacrifice. A priesthood and religious ceremonies are also lacking"
(Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:976).

Does membership in this religious group require participation in large-scale rituals:


I.e. involving two or more households; includes large-scale “ceremonies” and “festivals.”

— No
Notes: "The amazing simplicity revealed in the Yamana way of life is, naturally, also apparent in the
religious realm. Except for specific prayer formulas, their outward religious activity is remarkably
limited. They have no actual portrayal of their Supreme Being or particular places reserved for his
worship, nor do they have any kind of sacrifice. A priesthood and religious ceremonies are also lacking"
(Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:976).

Society and Institutions


Levels of Social Complexity

Pitek, Database of Religious History, 2019 Page 17 of 20


The society to which the religious group belongs is best characterized as (please choose
one):
This question refers to the wider society in which the religious group is located.

— A band
Notes: The Yahgan "...do not recognize any person as having the authority to rule either the whole
society or the larger groups within it, no matter what names are applied to such persons in higher
social organizations. This by no means strange phenomenon is confirmed not only by the independent
position of the individual family and its freedom to settle anywhere, but also by the definite testimony
of many observers" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:634).

Education

Does the religious group provide formal education to its adherents:


— No
Notes: No ethnographic evidence for the presence of formal education.

Bureaucracy

Do the group’s adherents interact with a formal bureaucracy within their group:
— No
Notes: The Yahgan "...do not recognize any person as having the authority to rule either the whole
society or the larger groups within it, no matter what names are applied to such persons in higher
social organizations. This by no means strange phenomenon is confirmed not only by the independent
position of the individual family and its freedom to settle anywhere, but also by the definite testimony
of many observers" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:634).

Taxation

Does the religious group in question levy taxes or tithes:


— No
Notes: No ethnographic evidence for the presence of taxes or tithes.

Are taxes levied on the group’s adherents by an institution(s) other than the religious group in
question:
— No
Notes: No ethnographic evidence for the presence of taxes or tithes.

Enforcement

Does the religious group in question provide an institutionalized police force:


— No

Pitek, Database of Religious History, 2019 Page 18 of 20


Notes: "Actually, conditions in the simple social organization of our Fuegians are more orderly,
principled, and peaceful than many Europeans might believe, although they neither have a police
force and courts of justice nor are under the leadership of chiefs" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1031).

Does the religious group in question provide institutionalized judges:


— No
Notes: "Actually, conditions in the simple social organization of our Fuegians are more orderly,
principled, and peaceful than many Europeans might believe, although they neither have a police
force and courts of justice nor are under the leadership of chiefs" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1031).
"Similarly there is no authoritative judge over all the people; everyone must seek his own justice. He
finds aid and support among his circle of kinsmen in cases of legal disputes" (Gusinde and Schütze,
1937:635).

Does the religious group in question enforce institutionalized punishment:


— No
Notes: "Similarly there is no authoritative judge over all the people; everyone must seek his own justice.
He finds aid and support among his circle of kinsmen in cases of legal disputes" (Gusinde and Schütze,
1937:635).

Does the religious group in question have a formal legal code:


— No
Notes: "Although tribal members are not united under a common chief (p. 601), they nevertheless feel
and act homogeneously, guided and obligated by one and the same tradition which, though
unwritten, is like a book of laws. No one would venture to neglect it and go his own way or even less to
oppose it with scornful comments" (Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1026).

Written Language

Does the religious group in question possess its own distinct written language:
— No
Notes: The Yahgan language appears to have been written only after the arrival of missionaries (see
Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1401).

Calendar

Does the religious group in question possess a formal calendar:


— No
Notes: No ethnographic evidence for a formal calendar. For a description of time designations among
the Yahgan, see Gusinde and Schütze, 1937:1384-1388.

Food Production

Pitek, Database of Religious History, 2019 Page 19 of 20


Does the religious group in question provide food for themselves:
— Yes
Notes: The Yahgan rely predominantly on fishing, with hunting as a secondary form of subsistence.
Gathering makes a supplemental contribution to the diet. Source of information from Ethnographic
Atlas (Murdock, 1962-1971), retrieved from Divale, 2004; Variables 203-207, 232.

Please characterize the forms/level of food production [choose all that apply]:
— Gathering

— Hunting (including marine animals)

— Fishing

Notes: The Yahgan rely predominantly on fishing, with hunting as a secondary form of
subsistence. Gathering makes a supplemental contribution to the diet. Source of information
from Ethnographic Atlas (Murdock, 1962-1971), retrieved from Divale, 2004; Variables 203-207,
232.

Pitek, Database of Religious History, 2019 Page 20 of 20

You might also like