C08975-1 Condition 46 Site Specific MGT Plan CIAP Coquitlam Spd7 October 19, 2020 - A7J5X2

Trans Mountain Expansion Project
Email: info@transmountain.com | Phone: 1.866.514.6700 | Website: www.transmountain.com | @TransMtn
VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION
October 19, 2020

Canada Energy Regulator
Suite 210, 517 Tenth Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta T2R 0A8
To: M. Jean-Denis Charlebois, Secretary of the Commission
Dear M. Charlebois:
Re: Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC (Trans Mountain)
Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMEP)
OC-065
Condition 46: Contamination Identification and Assessment Plan (CIAP)
Coquitlam Industrial Area - Site Specific Management Plan
Phase 36: Spread 7
File OF-Fac-Oil-T260-2013-03 61
Trans Mountain provides the attached site-specific management plan for construction of the
pipeline through the Coquitlam Industrial Area, a pre-existing industrial site in Spread 7 identified
in the Condition 46: Contamination Identification and Assessment Plan [A90938].
This filing also fulfills Trans Mountain’s Commitment ID# 3978 to: “develop an appropriate site-
specific health and safety plan to address worker and public protection when working in and
around the landfill and exposure to solid waste, landfill gas and leachate, and associated
contaminatns of concern at the former Fraser Mills site and Coquitlam Landfill.”
Should you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further, please contact the
undersigned at regulatory@transmountain.com or (403) 514-6400.
Yours truly,
Original signed by
Scott Stoness
Vice President, Regulatory and Compliance
Trans Mountain Canada Inc.
Encl.: Site Specific Management Plan for Construction – Coquitlam Industrial Area
Suite 2700, 300 5th Avenue SW, Calgary, AB T2P 5J2

SITE-SPECIFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN
COQUITLAM INDUSTRIAL AREA
FOR THE
TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT
CER Condition 46
October 2020
DRAFT - REV 0
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Prepared for:
Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC

Suite 2700, 300 – 5th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta T2P 5J2
Ph: 403-514-6400
Trans Mountain Corporation Site-Specific Management Plan – Coquitlam Industrial Area
Trans Mountain Expansion Project October 2020
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 1
1.1.1 Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal, 2381 Rogers Avenue,
Coquitlam, Site ID: 8345 ........................................................................................ 2
1.1.2 Former Leeder Landfill, 2080 United Boulevard to 51 Leeder Street,
Coquitlam, Site ID: N/A .......................................................................................... 2
1.1.3 Great Canadian Casinos, 2100 United Boulevard, Coquitlam, Site ID:
9109 ....................................................................................................................... 2
1.1.4 Former Terra Nova Landfill, 1200 to 1988 United Boulevard, Coquitlam,
Site ID: N/A ............................................................................................................ 2
1.1.5 Former Fraser Mills, 8 to 10 King Edward Street, Coquitlam, Site ID:
7829 ....................................................................................................................... 2
1.1.6 Former Coquitlam Landfill, 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam, Site ID:
2194 ....................................................................................................................... 3
1.2 Objectives and Scope of Work............................................................................................ 5
2.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................................... 6
2.1 Soil Standards ..................................................................................................................... 6
2.2 Groundwater Standards ...................................................................................................... 6
3.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION ......................................................................................................... 7
3.1 Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal, 2381 Rogers Avenue, Coquitlam,
Site ID: 8345 ....................................................................................................................... 7
3.2 Former Leeder Landfill, 2080 United Boulevard to 51 Leeder Street, Coquitlam,
Site ID: N/A ......................................................................................................................... 8
3.3 Great Canadian Casinos, 2100 United Boulevard, Coquitlam, Site ID: 9109 .................... 8
3.4 Former Terra Nova Landfill, 1200 to 1988 United Boulevard, Coquitlam, Site ID:
N/A ...................................................................................................................................... 8
3.5 Former Fraser Mills, 8 to 10 King Edward Street, Coquitlam, Site ID: 7829 ...................... 8
3.6 Former Coquitlam Landfill, 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam, Site ID: 2194 ................... 9
4.0 REGIONAL INFORMATION AND SITE SETTING ........................................................................ 10
4.1 Topography and Drainage ................................................................................................ 10
4.2 Regional Geology and Hydrogeology ............................................................................... 10
4.3 Site Geology, Stratigraphy and Hydrogeology.................................................................. 11
5.0 CONTAMINANTS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN ............................................................................ 13
5.1 Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal, 2381 Rogers Avenue, Coquitlam
Contaminants of Potential Concern and Contaminants of Concern ................................. 13
5.2 Former Leeder Landfill, 2080 United Boulevard to 51 Leeder St, Coquitlam,
5.3 Great Canadian Casinos, 2100 United Boulevard, Coquitlam, Contaminants of
Potential Concern and Contaminants of Concern ............................................................ 14
5.4 Former Terra Nova Landfill, 1200 to 1988 United Boulevard, Coquitlam,
5.5 Former Fraser Mills 8 to 10 King Edward Street, Coquitlam Contaminants of
5.6 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam (Former Coquitlam Landfill) Contaminants of
5.7 Summary of Contaminants of Potential Concern and Contaminants of Concern ............ 18
6.0 CONSTRUCTION FOOTPRINT WITHIN COQUITLAM INDUSTRIAL AREA .............................. 22
6.1 Groundwater Monitoring Well Decommissioning and New Well Placement .................... 22
6.2 Data Review – Conclusions .............................................................................................. 27
7.0 CONSTRUCTION PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND MITIGATION ...................................... 28
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page i
7.1 Site Preparation Prior to Construction for Contaminants of Potential Concern ................ 28
7.2 Regulatory Criteria and Exposure Pathways .................................................................... 28
7.3 Confirmatory Sampling Methodology and Analytical Requirements................................. 29
7.4 Handling Contaminated Material and Disposal................................................................. 30
7.5 Trench Backfilling and Mitigation Measures ..................................................................... 30
7.6 Design Considerations and Engineering Controls ............................................................ 31
8.0 HEALTH AND SAFETY PLANNING .............................................................................................. 33
9.0 RESPONSIBILITIES, CONSULTATION AND REPORTING......................................................... 34
9.1 Roles and Responsibilities ................................................................................................ 34
9.2 Consultation ...................................................................................................................... 34
9.3 Reporting Requirements ................................................................................................... 34
10.0 LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................................. 35
11.0 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................... 36
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Properties within Identified Coquitlam Industrial Area ........................................................ 1
Table 2 Available Historical Reports and Documentation................................................................ 7
Table 3 2381 Rogers Avenue Coquitlam Soil Parameters ............................................................ 13
Table 4 2381 Rogers Avenue Coquitlam Groundwater Parameters ............................................. 13
Table 5 2080 United Boulevard to 51 Leeder Street, Coquitlam Soil Parameters ........................ 14
Table 6 2080 United Boulevard to 51 Leeder Street, Coquitlam Groundwater
Parameters........................................................................................................................ 14
Table 7 1200 to 1988 United Boulevard Coquitlam Soil Parameters ............................................ 15
Table 8 1200 to 1988 United Boulevard Coquitlam Groundwater Parameters ............................. 15
Table 9 8 to 10 King Edward Street Coquitlam Soil Parameters ................................................... 16
Table 10 8 to 10 King Edward Street Coquitlam Groundwater Parameters .................................... 16
Table 11 1001 United Boulevard Coquitlam Soil Parameters ......................................................... 17
Table 12 1001 United Boulevard Coquitlam Groundwater Parameters .......................................... 17
Table 13 Soil Contaminants of Concern for Coquitlam Industrial Area ........................................... 18
Table 14 Groundwater Contaminants of Concern and Contaminants of Potential
Concern for the Coquitlam Industrial Area ........................................................................ 19
Table 15 Contaminants of Concern Potential Health Effects........................................................... 20
Table 16 Groundwater Monitoring Wells Locations ......................................................................... 23
Table 17 Soil Laboratory Analysis ................................................................................................... 29
Table 18 Groundwater/Surface Water Laboratory Analysis ............................................................ 30
Table 19 Chemical Compatibility Assessment ................................................................................. 31
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Site Location Map ............................................................................................................... 4
Figure 2 Coquitlam East Area Soil and Groundwater Contaminants of Concern ........................... 24
Figure 3 Coquitlam West Area Soil and Groundwater Contaminants of Concern .......................... 25
Figure 4 Former Landfill Footprints ................................................................................................. 26
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page ii
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Term Meaning
µg/g microgram(s) per gram
µg/L microgram(s) per litre
AIP Approval in Principle
APEC area of potential environmental concern
AW aquatic life (use)
AWF aquatic life freshwater (use)
BC British Columbia
BC CSR British Columbia Contaminated Sites Regulation
BC ENV British Columbia Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy
BTEX benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene
CCME Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment
CEQG Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines
CER Canada Energy Regulator
CIAP Contamination Identification and Assessment Plan
CL commercial land (use)
CoC Contaminant of Concern
CoPC Contaminant of Potential Concern
CSA Canadian Standards Association
DW drinking water (use)
EPH extractable petroleum hydrocarbon
ESA Environmental Site Assessment
ha hectare(s)
HEPH heavy extractable petroleum hydrocarbon
HDD horizontal directional drill
IL industrial land (use)
km kilometre(s)
KP Kilometre Post
LEPH light extractable petroleum hydrocarbon
m metre(s)
m3 cubic metre(s)
m/m millimetre(s) per millimetre(s)
MAC maximum acceptable concentration
masl metre(s) above sea level
mbgs metre(s) below ground surface
mg/L milligram(s) per litre
mm millimetre(s)
m/s metre(s) per second
NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
NPS Nominal Pipe Size
PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
PCB polychlorinated biphenyls
PPE personal protective equipment
TDS total dissolved solids
Thurber Thurber Consultants Ltd.
TMEP or the Project Trans Mountain Expansion Project
TOC total organic carbon
Trans Mountain Trans Mountain Corporation
VPH volatile petroleum hydrocarbon
VOC volatile organic compound
WTEF Waste to Energy Facility
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page iii
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Site-Specific Management Plan was developed for construction of the Trans Mountain Expansion
Project (TMEP or the Project) within the Coquitlam Industrial Area; referring specifically to the portion of the
pipeline, from KP 1168.85 to 1173.2, planned to be in the vicinity of United Boulevard in the 1000 – 2400
block of Coquitlam, British Columbia (BC) (Figure 1).
Ongoing communication may occur, as needed, between Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC (Trans Mountain),
stakeholders of the sites within the Coquitlam Industrial Area and other external parties (as necessary). These
consultation efforts will drive awareness of the construction activities, schedule and construction risks (originating
from potential contamination) as well as illustrating that appropriate risk mitigation measures are developed to
satisfy all parties prior to construction.
1.1 Background
As part of the Canada Energy Regulator (CER) Conditions for the TMEP, a Contamination Identification
and Assessment Plan (CIAP) was prepared to meet CER Condition 46 (Trans Mountain 2018; Filing ID
A90938). Within the CIAP, an inventory of potentially contaminated areas was created, and classified as
low-, moderate- or high-risk to describe the possibility of encountering contamination that requires
management within the Project footprint during planning, preparation and construction of the Project. Sites
identified within the CIAP as high-risk required a site-specific management plan to be developed to support
contamination management, while sites identified as low- or moderate-risk will be managed using the
chance find protocol during construction.
Table 1 presents a summary of the six properties, which, when combined for the purposes of this Plan, are
identified together as the “Coquitlam Industrial Area”.
TABLE 1
PROPERTIES WITHIN IDENTIFIED COQUITLAM INDUSTRIAL AREA
CIAP Site Risk

Approximate KP Description Current / Former Site Use Classification
1168.85 to 1169.15 Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal Industrial complex Low-Risk
2381 Rogers Avenue, Coquitlam Truck and trailer maintenance
BC Site Registry Site Number: 8345 Used oil and diesel underground storage tanks
1169.35 to 1170.0 Former Leeder Landfill Landfill High-Risk
2080 United Boulevard to 51 Leeder Street,
Coquitlam
1169.9 to 1170.0 Great Canadian Casino Casino Moderate-Risk
2100 United Boulevard, Coquitlam Truck terminal and maintenance
BC Site Registry Site Number: 9109 Leeder Landfill
1170.0 to 1171.85 Former Terra Nova Landfill Landfill High-Risk
1200 to 1988 United Boulevard, Coquitlam
1171.85 to 1172.0 Former Fraser Mills Industrial and Commercial operations High-Risk
8 to 10 King Edward Street, Coquitlam Laminated lumber product production
BC Site Registry Site Number: 7829 (note, Lumber Storage
possible area of groundwater contamination)
1172.3 to 1173.2 Former Coquitlam Landfill Golf Course High-Risk
1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam Landfill
BC Site Registry Site Number: 2194
(note, possible area of groundwater
contamination)
The high-, moderate- and low-risk CIAP site classifications are based on the review of multiple historical
site assessment reports. These include: approval in principle reports, notice of independent remediation
and confirmation of remediation reports, groundwater monitoring reports, Phase I Environmental
Assessments (ESAs) and conditional certificates of compliance. Refer to Section 3.0 for further summaries
of historical information for each of these sites.
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 1
1.1.1 Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal, 2381 Rogers Avenue, Coquitlam,
Site ID: 8345
The Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal Site is located at 2381 Rogers Avenue, Coquitlam, BC
north of the planned TMEP right-of-way from KP 1168.85 to 1169.15. The site was developed in 1978 as a
service industrial complex and the adjacent properties (north, east, south and west) have been industrial
since 1977 (ARO 2003). Truck and trailer maintenance work has occurred in the eastern part of the building.
In addition, diesel and oil underground storage tanks were located on the southeastern portion of the site.
Currently the site appears to be occupied by Corix Infrastructure Inc. and United Rentals (Google 2019).
The BC Site Registry ID for the site is 8345. Based on the review of the reports available through the BC
Site Registry, the Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal has been re-classified from high-risk to low-
risk to impact this section of the TMEP right-of-way (Trans Mountain 2018).
1.1.2 Former Leeder Landfill, 2080 United Boulevard to 51 Leeder Street,

Coquitlam, Site ID: N/A
The Former Leeder Landfill spans 2080 United Boulevard to 51 Leeder Street, corresponding to KP 1169.35
to 1170.0. The planned TMEP right-of-way intersects through the northern portion of the Former Leeder
Landfill from east to west. The Leeder Landfill was a 27-ha industrial landfill located west of the Port Mann
Bridge at the foot of Leeder Avenue, in operation from 1965 to 1979 (Atwater 1980; Eivemark 2002). Filling
operations began at the Leeder Landfill in the 1980s to raise the elevation for future industrial development
(Atwater 1980). The resulting cap thickness is estimated at 2.75 to 4.25 m (Eivemark 2002). The landfill
accepted mainly commercial/industrial waste, including construction debris, hogfuel, wood waste,
demolition waste, garbage and glass (Atwater 1980). Prior to 1970, waste may have also included oils,
creosote, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), spent catalysts, drywall, tires and wood stumps (Eivemark
2002). The west portion of the Former Leeder Landfill footprint is currently being used as an industrial park
(combined paved/parking, exposed earth and paved/road), and the majority of the eastern portion consists
of a crushed stone yard (Figure 4). This site is considered high-risk based on the CIAP definition, given that
landfill waste, gas, and leachate are likely to be encountered (Trans Mountain 2018).
1.1.3 Great Canadian Casinos, 2100 United Boulevard, Coquitlam, Site ID: 9109
The Great Canadian Casino site is located at 2100 United Boulevard at KP 1169.9 to 1170.0. The site is
approximately 80 m north of the planned TMEP pipeline right-of-way. The Casino was developed on top of
the closed Former Leeder Landfill (discussed in subsection 1.2.2). The property has also been used as a
truck terminal (warehouse) and truck maintenance facility between 1975 and 2004. In 2004, before being
developed as part of the Casino expansion, it was used for overflow parking (Morrow 2004). Currently, the
site appears to be occupied by Hard Rock Casino and food restaurants (Google 2019). The BC Site Registry
ID for the Site is 9109. This site is considered moderate-risk based on the CIAP definition (Trans Mountain
2018).
1.1.4 Former Terra Nova Landfill, 1200 to 1988 United Boulevard, Coquitlam, Site
ID: N/A
The Former Terra Nova Landfill spans 1200 to 1988 United Boulevard, corresponding to KP 1170.0 to
1171.85. The planned TMEP right-of-way intersects through the northern portion of the Former Terra Nova
Landfill from east to west. The 60-ha landfill was constructed on virgin swamp land and was in operation
from 1965 to 1975 (Thurber 1989a). The lands that comprise the Former Terra Nova Landfill footprint are
currently used as an industrial park (primarily paved/road, and some road easement) (BGC 2016),
constructed over an initial fill thickness of 0.45 m (Atwater 1980). The Former Terra Nova Landfill accepted
mainly commercial/industrial waste, including hogfuel refuse (e.g., paper, plastic, metal wire and tin cans)
(Thurber 1989a). This site is considered high-risk based on the CIAP definition, given that landfill waste,
gas and leachate are likely to be encountered (Trans Mountain 2018).
1.1.5 Former Fraser Mills, 8 to 10 King Edward Street, Coquitlam, Site ID: 7829
The Former Fraser Mills site is located south of the planned TMEP right-of-way at 8-10 King Edward at KP
1171.85 to 1172.0 (Figure 3). The area of the site is approximately 2.5 ha and consists of one legal lot. Soil
stratigraphy is generally sandy fill material combined with landfill domestic waste and wood debris overlying
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 2
organic peat layer overlying native clay (CH2M 2017). The land surrounding the site is currently used for
commercial purposes (e.g., bakery and hair salon). The BC Site Registry ID is 7829. This site is considered
high-risk based on the CIAP definition, as known contamination has been documented and there is potential
to encounter contaminated fill. (Trans Mountain 2018).
1.1.6 Former Coquitlam Landfill, 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam, Site ID: 2194
The Former Coquitlam Landfill is located at 1001 United Boulevard and spans KP 1172.3 to 1173.2 (Figure
3). The following background information is based on the summary provided by Golder (2002) and AECOM
(2017). The Former Coquitlam Landfill is a 32.2 ha closed landfill owned by the Metro Vancouver. The
Former Coquitlam Landfill is bounded to the west by the Brunette River, to the south by a wood
manufacturing and preserving plant, to the east by a railway spur, Nelson Creek and industrial properties
and to the north by railroad tracks and Highway No. 1. Historically, the Former Coquitlam Landfill accepted
Municipal solid waste, demolition waste and industrial wood waste for disposal between 1973 and 1983
and received fly ash from the Burnaby Waste to Energy Facility (WTEF) into lined cells from 1991 to 1999.
Materials from the WTEF, biosolids from the Annacis Island Wastewater Treatment Plant, and other inert
materials (e.g., topsoil, yard waste) were used in recycling and development activities at the site.
A driving range and golf course has operated on the north portion of the Landfill since 1999. Wood waste
recycling occurred through to December 2016 in the southwest portion of the site. Metro Vancouver
constructed a transfer station, which required paving large areas within the southern portion of the site. The
ongoing work has been approved by the BC Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy
(BC ENV) and is part of the closure plan (AECOM 2015). The BC Site Registry ID for the Site is 2194. This
site is considered high-risk based on the CIAP definition, given that landfill waste, gas and leachate could
potentially be encountered during pipeline construction (Trans Mountain 2018).
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 3
500000 510000 520000
¯ Or
Cre e k
Pe r c
Mount Seymour
y
Provincial Cr e
r
Say Nuth Khaw Yum Provincial Park
Se ymo ur Ri ve
ek
Park
(a.k.a. Indian Arm Provincial Park)
Alla
AN M O R E
Fra
re
nC
ek
NOR TH
n
cis
ek
VANCO UVER B u nt z e n C
re
BEL CARRA
Cre
- DISTRICT Pinecone Burke
ek
Provincial Park De
ek in
t C re
Ma
er
ek
t
Cr e e
Cr e
he
C re
An
cI
itc
no k re
nt
Cre e
ek
Pr
re
Cr
ey
y
m ee
eek
so
n
art
We st Noons C r
k
os
Mc C
Burrard
M
Inlet 3
COQU ITLAM
t o n Creek
ek
Seymour
e tt Cre
r
Sm iling Cree k
Creek 2 ve
H yde
PORT MOO DY H
Ri
re e k
ng
5460000
5460000
C o q tla m
Cre e k
Pa
r ti
sC
De B
k
7A
o on
V
U
ui
ee
N o vil
le S
Cr
lou g
y
h
Ho
Sc
ot
tC
re
ek
KP 1180.15
KP 1180 !
!
.
. Al ouette Riv er
PORT
e ek
Still Creek
COQU ITLAM
Cr
r
ve
ey
Ri
Coquitlam 2
on
tt
St
Pi
oug
ek
BUR NABY e River rr y S

l
et t
th C re
run C ranb e
C om
Ne ls on C
B
B oo
gh
o Cre ek
ie Slou
!
.
KP 1175 K atz
1
V
U
Tulle y S
ree k
o ug h
7 Coquitlam 1
V
U PITT MEADO WS
7B
V
U
Sl
loug
Cook
!
.
a nn el
n Ch KP 1170
h
e rto
er
Riv
pp
se r
Fra
Sa
NEW
Barker Cr e e k
!
.
KP 1165 17
WES TMINS TER V
U
5450000
5450000
P ar s on
Barnston
Island 3
s Ch
l !
.
ne KP 1160
an
n el
ha
n
i sC
n ac Site Location
91A An
V
U
RICHMOND
99A
V
U
k
re e
a hood C Cre e k
M mer
L ati
METRO SURR EY
Co
u gh VANCOUVER
Sl o
ug
ury
ar
b
Ti l
C any
1A
Creek V
U
on
DELTA
Hylan d Cre ek
5440000
5440000
91
V
U
iver
lR
10 ek
V
U 99
V
U R iv
er
ver Nic
om
ne Ri
en ti l
Serp ek
m
co 15
Ni V
U
500000 510000 520000
1
Site Location V
U Highway Indian Reserve
Municipality
.
! Kilometre Post (KP) Paved Road FIGURE 1
Park / Protected Area
TMEP Proposed Centreline SITE LOCATION MAP
(SSEID005.3, SSEID005.14) Railway
SHEET 1 OF 1
Regional District
Trans Mountain Existing Pipeline (TMPL) Watercourse Waterbody TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT
201905_MAP_CH2M_CS_01135_RevA_Fig1.mxd
MAP NUMBER PAGE
Projection: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 10N.

201905_MAP_CH2M_CS_01135_REVA_FIG1 SHEET 1 OF 1
Centreline SSEID005.3 (Westridge Lateral) provided by UPI Nov 30, 2017; Pipeline KPs & Centreline SSEID005.14 (Spread 7) provided by UPI Oct 26, 2018; DATE REFERENCE REVISION
TMPL Route Revision 0 provided by KMC, May 2012; Transportation: NRCan 2015; Geopolitical Boundary: MMAH 2016; Indian Reserve: Government of Canada 2018; December 2019 CE733700 A
Hydrology: NRCan 2007-2011; Park and Protected Area: BC MFLNRO 2008, NRCan 2017; SCALE PAGE SIZE DISCIPLINE
Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community. 1:100,000 11x17 GEN
DRAWN CHECKED DESIGN
CRM CMR
This document is provided by Trans Mountain Corporation (TMC) for use by the intended recipient only. This information is confidential and proprietary to TMC and is not to be provided to any other recipient without the written consent of TMC. DR
It is not to be used for legal, engineering or surveying purposes, nor for doing any work on or around TMC's pipelines and facilities, all of which require TMC's prior written approval. Kilometres
0 1 2 3
Although there is no reason to believe that there are any errors associated with the data used to generate this product or in the product itself, users of these data are advised that errors in the data may be present. ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE
1.2 Objectives and Scope of Work

The objective of this Site-Specific Management Plan is to provide guidance to construction Contractors,
Environmental Inspectors and Contamination Resource Specialists during the planning and construction
stages of the TMEP within and/or near the Coquitlam Industrial Area.
The scope of work included the following tasks for the Coquitlam Industrial Area:
• Reviewing historical reports and information to determine if adequate information on Contaminants of

Potential Concern (CoPCs) is available or if data gaps exist that may require supplemental pre-
construction soil and/or groundwater sampling.
• Identifying CoPCs
• At locations where historical assessment activities were completed, determining which, if any, of the
existing third-party monitoring wells may be affected by the planned construction activities.
• Recommending risk mitigation measures to be implemented during pre-construction, construction and

post-construction phases regarding the management of soils, groundwater, and surface water that may
contain CoPCs.
• Reviewing and discussing general health and safety considerations of CoPCs including exposure
pathways and receptors, monitoring activities during construction, personal protective equipment (PPE)
and emergency response measures.
• Describing roles and responsibilities of all parties involved when historical contamination, or suspected
historical contamination is encountered (based on the Trans Mountain Environmental Field Guide –
Contamination Roles and Responsibilities document [Trans Mountain 2019])
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 5
2.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

Contaminants of Concern (CoCs) at the Coquitlam Industrial Area have been identified through comparison
of historical analytical data to the BC CSR groundwater and soil standards, including amendments up to
BC Regulation 13/2019 as of January 24, 2019 (BC ENV 2019). The BC Contaminated Sites Regulation
(BC CSR) prescribes numerical standards for soil, sediment, groundwater and soil vapour quality for
specific land, sediment and groundwater uses.
2.1 Soil Standards

Based on the current land uses at the Coquitlam Industrial Area, Industrial Land (IL) use standards and
Commercial Land (CL) use would be applicable for soil standards. If construction activities exceed the depth
stipulated for surface land use (3 mbgs), IL values would also be applicable at depths greater than 3 m.
Aquatic life water use applies to all groundwater located within 500 m of an aquatic receiving environment.
The Fraser River is 300 m to 800 m south of the pipeline right-of-way; therefore, standards to protect
groundwater flow to surface water used by freshwater aquatic life (AWF) use apply at all sites (within 500
m of the Fraser River). In addition, current and future protection of groundwater used as drinking water
(DW) use apply at the sites (within 500 m of the Fraser River). As a result of site conditions and location,
soil CoCs were compared to following site-specific factors while applying the matrix numerical BC CSR IL
standards:
• Schedule 3.1 – Part 1
- Intake of contaminated soil
- Toxicity to soil invertebrates and plants
- Groundwater used for DW
- Groundwater flow to surface water used by AWF
• Schedule 3.1 – Part 2 and Part 3 (Generic Numerical Soil Standards to Protect
Human/Ecological Health)
CoC concentrations have also been compared to the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment
(CCME) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (CEQG) (CCME 2019) for soils for the protection of
environmental and human health.
2.2 Groundwater Standards

CoC concentrations were compared to AWF and DW use standards listed in the BC CSR Schedule 3.2 –
Generic Numerical Water Standards as well as the CCME CEQG Water Quality Guidelines for the
protection of AWF.
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 6
3.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION

Available historical documentation for the Coquitlam Industrial Area sites dating back to 1980 was reviewed
and is listed in Table 2.
TABLE 2
AVAILABLE HISTORICAL REPORTS AND DOCUMENTATION

Report Name Date Report Conducted by/Reference
Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal - 2381 Rogers Avenue, Coquitlam
Confirmation of Remediation Report – 2381 Rogers
May, 2003 ARO 2003
Avenue Coquitlam, BC
Former Leeder Landfill, 2080 United Boulevard to 51 Leeder Street, Coquitlam
Geotechnical Construction Issues on Leeder Landfill
2002 Eivemark 2002
(Cape Horn Industrial Park, Coquitlam, BC)
Fraser River Estuary Study Water Quality – Impact of
April, 1980 Atwater 1980
Landfills
Great Canadian Casinos - 2100 United Boulevard, Coquitlam
Notification of Independent Remediation – 2100 United
September, 2004 Morrow 2004
Boulevard, Coquitlam, BC
Former Terra Nova Landfill - 1200 to 1988 United Boulevard, Coquitlam
Fraser Mill Development Contaminant Investigation
October, 1989 Thurber 1989a
Former Terra Nova Landfill
Terra Nova landfill Organic Analysis of Nine Site Wells October, 1989 Thurber 1989b
Terra Nova Landfill Preliminary Results Soil Gas
November, 1989 Thurber 1989c
Geochemical Investigation
Former Fraser Mills - 8 to 10 King Edward Street, Coquitlam
Summary of Drilling Investigation – 8-10 King Edward
February, 2017 CH2M 2017
Street, Coquitlam
Conditional Certificate of Compliance April, 2004 BC MOE 2004
#8-10 King Edward Street, Coquitlam, BC., Site ID#
7829 COC Application – Response to Request for July, 2003 Golder 2003a
Information
Confirmation of Remediation #8-10 King Edward Street,
January, 2003 Golder 2003b
Coquitlam, BC
Stage 1 Preliminary Site Investigation 8-10 King
April, 2000 NEXT Environmental 2000
Edward, Coquitlam, BC
Former Coquitlam Landfill - 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam
Site 2194 Coquitlam Landfill – 2016 Approval in
April 2017 AECOM 2017
Principle (AIP) Performance Verification Report
2017 Coquitlam Landfill Groundwater Monitoring Report April, 2018 AECOM 2018
Site 2194 Coquitlam Landfill 2014 Annual Approval in
April, 2015 AECOM 2015
Principle Report
Environmental Site Assessment, Risk Assessment and
May, 2002 Golder 2002
Remediation Plan, Coquitlam Landfill, Coquitlam, BC
A summary of the most pertinent and recent reports for the sites listed in Table 2 is presented as follows.
3.1 Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal, 2381 Rogers Avenue, Coquitlam,
Site ID: 8345
ARO Environmental (2003) completed remedial excavation at the Former Lougheed Warehouse and
Terminal in 2003. The objective of the remedial excavation was to remove petroleum hydrocarbon
contamination associated with former used oil and diesel tanks. The CoCs to the Former Lougheed
Warehouse and Terminal were light extractable petroleum hydrocarbon (LEPH) and heavy extractable
petroleum hydrocarbon (HEPH) associated with the former used oil tank basin. Field observations indicated
that the contamination was present at approximately 2.5 to 4.8 mbgs. The excavation involved removal and
off-site disposal of approximately 400 tonnes of damp, sandy silt exhibiting a strong petroleum odour and
discoloration. The LEPH and HEPH tested in groundwater following the remedial excavation was less than
the BC CSR Aquatic Life (AW) use standard and soil concentrations were less than the BC CSR IL standard
with the exception of one sample that exceeded HEPH. That one sample with the exceedance was located
below the concrete ramp (north of the site building, approximately 60 m from the TMEP right-of-way).
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 7
3.2 Former Leeder Landfill, 2080 United Boulevard to 51 Leeder Street,

Coquitlam, Site ID: N/A
A report summarizing the effects of landfills on the Fraser River Estuary water quality (Atwater 1980)
presented monitoring data throughout 1972 to 1978, with only select metals, inorganics and general
chemistry parameters being analyzed. This report included information about the Former Leeder Landfill.
The report noted that hydrogeological conditions at the Former Leeder Landfill (absence of peat above the
sand material) may have important implications for the migration of leachate (Atwater 1980; Eivemark
2002), given the absence of a substantial peat or clay layer and proximity of the Fraser sands units (see
Section 4.0).
3.3 Great Canadian Casinos, 2100 United Boulevard, Coquitlam, Site ID: 9109
Morrow Environmental Consultants completed a Notification of Independent Remediation (NIR) form for
the Great Canadian Casino site in 2004. The form indicated that independent remediation would commence
in September 2004 to a depth of approximately 2.7 mbgs; however, no further information is available on
the form or the BC Site Registry regarding the CoCs. The Great Canadian Casinos site is located fully
within the extent of the Former Leeder Landfill. The moderate-risk classification was the result of the NIR
registered for the site.
3.4 Former Terra Nova Landfill, 1200 to 1988 United Boulevard, Coquitlam, Site
ID: N/A
Thurber Consultants Ltd. (Thurber) conducted a contaminant investigation at the Former Terra Nova
Landfill which spans the area of 1200 – 1988 United Boulevard in Coquitlam (Figure 4). The Terra Nova
Landfill site was operated from 1965 to 1975 and originally was started on virgin swamp land (Thurber
1989a). Landfill operations between 1969 and 1972 were unrestricted in terms of materials disposed
(Thurber 1989a). Hogfuel (wood waste) was stored on-site and solid Municipal waste from Municipalities
(Burnaby, Coquitlam, Port Coquitlam, New Westminster and Port Moody) was mixed with hogfuel,
compacted and filled on-site (Thurber 1989a). Granular fill was used to cover the solid waste/hogfuel
mixture. Waste processed during the period of 1969 to 1972 was characterized as approximately 60%
solid Municipal waste and 40% industrial wastes by weight (Thurber 1989a). In addition, industrial source
chemical wastes were disposed in drums on-site (Thurber 1989a). Tank sludges were used to oil site
roads and there was localized disposal of waste engine lubricants and hydraulic fluids (Thurber 1989b).
Thurber conducted investigations regarding contaminant distribution and a soil gas geochemical
investigation in 1989, no soil or groundwater chemical data were reported. Based on information
presented by Thurber, the Former Terra Nova Landfill had a history of leachate problems that were
detrimental to fish and was reported to degrade local on-site creek quality (Thurber 1989a).
3.5 Former Fraser Mills, 8 to 10 King Edward Street, Coquitlam, Site ID: 7829
The Former Fraser Mills site was used for lumber storage from circa 1900s to 1967. Glulam Products
produced laminated lumber products at the site from 1967 to 1975 (CH2M 2017). The Stage 2 Preliminary
Site Investigation/Detailed Site Investigation conducted by Golder in 2002 concluded that the hydrocarbon
contamination at the site is a random occurrence not directly related to operations at site but associated
with the wood waste/refuse material imported to the site as part of site filling operations (Golder 2003a).
Golder also reported an extensive presence of refuse likely from historical dumping of garbage and wood
waste. In the garbage and wood waste, the presence of elevated metals and hydrocarbon concentrations
were also identified (Golder 2003a). Chlorobenzene concentrations in groundwater at two locations
exceeded the BC CSR standards (Golder 2003a).
A conditional Certificate of Compliance for risk-based monitoring was issued in 2004 for the Former Fraser
Mills site (BC MOE 2004). In soil, the contaminants for which the Certificate of Compliance was prepared
include: volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPHs), LEPH, HEPH, xylene, 1,2 dichlorobenzene and inorganic
substances (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, silver, tin and zinc) according to risk-based
standards. Groundwater contaminants for which the Certificate of Compliance was prepared include:
chlorobenzene and cis-1,2-dichloroethylene as per risk-based standards (BC MOE 2004).
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 8
In 2016, CH2M HILL Energy Canada, Ltd. (now Jacobs) performed a drilling investigation to evaluate soil
and groundwater quality in the northern portion of the site (i.e., that portion of the property that is located
within the TMEP footprint). CoCs in soil exceeding the BC CSR IL standards in soil adjacent to the TMEP
right-of-way were: HEPH and total metals including barium, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, zinc, arsenic
and benzene. CoCs in groundwater included 1,4-dichlorobenzene.
3.6 Former Coquitlam Landfill, 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam, Site ID: 2194
Golder completed an ESA, risk assessment and remediation plan for the former Coquitlam Landfill in 2002.
Golder identified and investigated 12 areas of potential environmental concern (APECs). Potentially-
impacted media included: landfill materials, landfill gas, shallow soil gas, landfill surface water, groundwater,
surface water in adjacent water courses and sediment. A wide range of CoPCs were identified and analyzed
for, including: metals, inorganics, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH), extractable petroleum
hydrocarbons (EPHs), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX), chlorophenols and volatile
organic compounds (VOCs).
To fulfill the BC ENV landfill permit (issued in 1976 and amended in 1980), AECOM conducted groundwater
monitoring programs from 2012 to 2017 at the request of Metro Vancouver (AECOM 2017). Monitoring
wells that were sampled included: six shallow wells (< 4 m), four intermediate-depth wells
(4 to 9 m), seven deep wells (> 9 m) and four leachate mound wells.
The risk assessment conduced by Golder (2002), indicated that under the current and assumed future land
uses (upgraded IL and or CL use) the potential risks to human and ecological health are within acceptable
limits, assuming that risk management controls are maintained, and improvements controls are
implemented. Risk management controls consist of a 1 to 3 m silty till cap placed in 1982 and 1987, as well
as treated sewer sludge mixed with clean soil as a cover over the north half of the landfill, a perimeter
leachate control system, a site-wide landfill gas extraction system, and a landfill gas interceptions and
control system for the golf course club house (Golder 2002). Recently, an AIP Performance Verification
Report was prepared by AECOM (2017) regarding the plan to develop a Municipal waste transfer station
facility on the south side of the landfill.
The following exceedances at the former Coquitlam Landfill were identified relative to BC CSR IL standards
in landfill material (i.e., fly and bottom ash) and in soil samples: arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead,
mercury, selenium, molybdenum, tin, zinc and PAH.
The following exceedances relative to BC CSR AW use standards for landfill groundwater were identified:
• Landfill groundwater (perched): ammonia, sulphate, benzo(a)pyrene, pyrene, and LEPH, chloride,
sodium, aluminum, biological oxygen demand and chemical oxygen demand
• Shallow groundwater adjacent to the Landfill: ammonia, silver, benzo(a)pyrene and pyrene; ammonia;
ammonia and silver were not considered significant due to the marginal exceedances relative to the
BC CSR AW use standards (Golder 2002)
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 9
4.0 REGIONAL INFORMATION AND SITE SETTING

4.1 Topography and Drainage
The local topography near the Coquitlam Industrial Area is generally flat with a broad west to east
topographic high (approximately 130 masl) to the north (GeoBC 2016). The Coquitlam Industrial Area
ranges from 4 to 10 masl, with lower elevations to the south and higher elevations to the north (Government
of BC 2019a). The area is bounded by three rivers: the Brunette River to the west; the Coquitlam River to
the east; and the Fraser River to the south. Nelson Creek intersects a portion of the area to the west of 8-
10 King Edwards Street, Coquitlam (CH2M 2012). Mill Creek and Como Creek/Popeye Creek intersect the
Former Terra Nova Landfill to the west and east, respectively.
Drainage through the former Coquitlam Landfill occurs as follows (as summarized by AECOM [AECOM
2018]):
• from the south ditch at the southwest corner of the site towards Nelson Creek
• through ditches and storm sewers along the United Boulevard extension that drain
roadway storm waters through filtration ponds prior to discharge into Brunette River and
Nelson Creek
Temporary flow reversals induced by tidal fluctuations were also noted in a portion of the Brunette River to
the west of the Landfill (AECOM 2018). Drainage through the Former Terra Nova Landfill is directed through
Mill Creek to the west and through Como Creek/Popeye Creek to the east (BGC 2016). According to
Atwater (1980), both of these creeks exhibit flow reversal at their mouths by high stages on the Fraser
River. Drainage may also occur directly into the Fraser River along the southern boundary (Atwater 1980).
Drainage through the Former Leeder Landfill occurred to the south, following natural topography, and the
principal surface flow was directed through a surface ditch to the Fraser River along the east side of the
original property (Atwater 1980).
4.2 Regional Geology and Hydrogeology

The regional bedrock geology description of the Fraser Lowland was based on the summary in Armstrong
(1984), and the maps provided by the Government of BC (2019b). The surficial quaternary deposits are
underlain primarily by tertiary aged sedimentary rocks, with lesser upper cretaceous aged sedimentary
rocks, consisting of interbedded sandstones, siltstones, mudstones, shales and conglomerates. Tertiary
basaltic volcanic rocks are encountered within the package of sedimentary strata as dykes, sills and flows.
Throughout the New Westminster area, tertiary strata lie unconformably over Mesozoic granitic plutons and
metamorphic rocks. However, south of the Fraser River throughout eastern Mission and Chilliwack, these
Tertiary strata lie unconformably over Paleozoic and Mesozoic sedimentary and volcanic rocks with
frequent granitic plutons.
The surficial geology description of the Fraser Lowland was based on the summaries in Armstrong (1984)
and Golder (2002), and the maps provided by the Government of BC (2019b). The surficial deposits consist
of a complex package of Quaternary deposits, categorized from youngest to oldest as follows: postglacial,
postglacial and Pleistocene, and Pleistocene. The postglacial deposits comprise the Salish sediments
(landfill, bog, marine and lowland deposits) and the Fraser River sediments (deltaic and channel fil
sediments). The postglacial and Pleistocene deposits comprise marine and fluvial sands. The Pleistocene
deposits comprise the Sumas Drift (outwash and deltaic deposits), the Fort Langley Formation (glacial and
deltaic sediments), the Capilano Sediments (marine, deltaic and alluvial deposits), the Vashon Drift
(glaciofluvial and glaciolacustrine deposits), and the Pre-Vachon Drift (nonglacial and glaciomarine
deposits).
The regional low is the Fraser River, at sea level, and the regional high ranges from approximately 90 to
150 masl, approximately 1 km north of the Area. It can be inferred that regional groundwater in the area will
flow south towards the Fraser River which flows into the Strait of Georgia (an arm of the Pacific Ocean).
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 10
4.3 Site Geology, Stratigraphy and Hydrogeology

The area is situated in directly on the banks of the Fraser River Delta, which sources sediments from the
Coast Range Mountains (Groulx et al. 2004). The overburden geology of the area is defined as follows
based on a map provided by the Geologic Survey of Canada (Armstrong and Hiscock 1980):
• local occurrences of landfill and fill
• Salish Sediments to the north: lowland peat (up to 2-m-thick)
• Fraser River Sediments through entire Area: overbank silty to silt loam (up to 2-m-thick)
that overlies a thick (greater than 15 m) deltaic and distributary channel fill sandy to silt
loam
• Pre-Vachon Deposits to the west: fluvial channel fill and floodplain sands and silts with
gravel interbeds
These Quaternary sediments overlie Kitsilano Formation Tertiary sedimentary rocks, which comprise
conglomerate, sandstone and shale, with lesser basalt flows, sills and minor pyroclastics (Government of
BC 2019b).
Stratigraphy throughout the area was defined in several investigations (from east to west): ARO
Environmental (2003) for the Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal; BGC Engineering (2016) for the
Former Leeder Landfill, Great Canadian Casinos, and Former Terra Nova Landfill; CH2M (2017) for the
Former Fraser Mills; and Golder (2002) for the Coquitlam Landfill.
For the Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal area, stratigraphy was defined based on a single
representative boring (BH-13). An approximate 2-m-thick layer of sand fill was intersected directly below
the surface. The fill was underlain by an approximate 1-m-thick layer of sandy silty loam, which was in turn
underlain by a fine silty sand.
For the Former Leeder Landfill, the stratigraphy is approximately 0.1 to 0.9 m of peat on the northern portion
of the site which overlays 1.5 to 2.4 m of silt and clay that overlays sand and silt. The Great Canadian
Casino site situated on the northwest corner of the Former Leeder Landfill is assumed to have similar
stratigraphy.
For the Former Terra Nova Landfill, the stratigraphy is peat overlying silt and peat, overlying loose silt and
sands, overlying dense sands and overlying marine clay silt that overlays dense glacial till. It has also been
classified as discontinuous peat and organic silt, overlying silt and sands, overlying glacial deposits of sand,
gravel and till.
For the Former Fraser Mills area, stratigraphy was defined by three borings drilled along the TMEP right-
of-way (MW16-C-1, MW16-C-2 and MW16-C-3).The first stratum intersected was a 0.75-m-thick to
1.25-m-thick layer of granular fill (predominantly sand and gravel). The fill was underlain by landfill,
consisting of wood refuse organic fill, and ranged from 0.75-m-thick to 2-m-thick from east to west; domestic
waste (plastic, aluminum, steel, glass and paper) and was mixed with the granular fill interval at location
MW16-C-2, and with the wood refuse interval at location MW16-C-3. A native peat layer ranging from
0.6-m-thick to 1-m-thick layer of peat was underlain by clay.
For the Coquitlam Landfill area, the stratigraphy was defined by numerous drilling programs from 1995 to
2001. The first stratigraphic unit interested was landfill materials, consisting of refuse, fly ash, bottom ash,
Nutrifor (a mixture of treated sewage sludge and topsoil) and mineral soils. Discontinuous fill was
intersected adjacent to the perimeter of the landfill, consisting of re-worked native silts and organic soils
with occasional pockets of sand and gravel. An approximately 1.5-m-thick layer of discontinuous native
peat and organics was intersected (interpreted as Salish Sediments) in the north and east portions of the
site. The peat and organics are underlain by fine-grained overbank deposits, consisting of silt with trace
clay and sand. This package ranged in thickness from 6 m to 15 m, thinning towards the Fraser River. The
overbank deposits are underlain by the Fraser River sands, which range in thickness from 6 m to 11 m and
are closer to surface toward the Fraser River.
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 11
Due to the heterogeneity of these stratigraphic units, several hydrostratigraphic units have been
conceptualized in previous reports for the Coquitlam Landfill (e.g., Golder 2002 and AECOM 2018). In the
most recent report done by AECOM (2018) for the Coquitlam Landfill, the following hydrostratigraphic units
were defined:
• shallow aquifer: shallow fill and peat/organics units (approximately 4-m-thick)
• intermediate aquitard: silt unit
• deep aquifer: “Fraser River Sands” unit
For the shallow aquifer, groundwater flow was interpreted to be affected by subsurface utilities, local
drainage (e.g., creeks), surface water ponding and tidal fluctuations. Therefore, there is a general north to
south flow with local flow components toward the Brunette River and Nelson Creek. Groundwater is
expected to flow vertically through the intermediate aquitard into the underlying deep aquifer. Groundwater
was determined to flow south toward the Fraser River within the deep aquifer, with horizontal gradients of
0.0004 m/m to 0.001 m/m (AECOM 2018). The hydraulic conductivity for the deep aquifer was determined
by Golder (1996) to be 2.0x10-4 m/s, which is consistent with literature values for medium-grained sands.
Given the lenticular nature of the peat/organics unit (Salish Sediments), this unit may not extend through
the entire area and was reported as becoming thinner and possibly not present in the southern portion of
the Coquitlam Landfill (Golder 2002) and an apparent lack of surficial peat or organics at the former Leeder
Landfill (Atwater 1980). The underlying stratigraphic units (intermediate and deep hydrostratigraphic units)
are assumed to be laterally continuous (east to west) throughout the area; although, their thicknesses may
vary.
For the Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal area, no proper groundwater measurements were
reported; however, boring log BH 13 indicates “wet at 3.8 mbgs”, which corresponds to an approximate
groundwater elevation of 2.2 masl (assuming ground surface elevation at 6 masl) (ARO 2003). For the
Leeder Landfill the aquifer ranges approximately 3.0 masl to 4.0 masl (similar ranges are expected at the
Former Great Canadian Casino site which is located on the northwest corner).
The neighbouring Terra Nova Landfill also has groundwater at approximately 3.0 masl to 4.0 masl. For
the Former Fraser Mills area, groundwater monitoring results from December 20 and 21, 2016 (CH2M
2017) indicate the shallow groundwater potentiometric surface was present at a depth of approximately
2 mbgs (3.5 masl; assuming average ground surface elevation of 5.5 masl) and was relatively level from
east to west. Groundwater was present within wood refuse and peat in a shallow aquifer bound by an
underlying layer of clay; the depth to the top of the clay interval ranges from 3.1 to 4 mbgs. For the
Coquitlam Landfill, groundwater elevations reported by AECOM (2018) for the shallow aquifer ranged
from approximately 0.7 masl to 2.4 masl, and from approximately 0.1 masl to 0.9 masl for the deep
aquifer.
Considering the hydrogeological conditions at all four sites: the shallow aquifer was present throughout
the western portion of the TMEP right-of-way, and groundwater elevations vary with topography and local
drainage; and, though it was only encountered at the Coquitlam Landfill, the deep aquifer is expected to
extend throughout the whole Project area, where the top depth of this unit is defined by the depth and
thicknesses of the intermediate silt aquitard.
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 12
5.0 CONTAMINANTS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN

CoPCs and CoCs at the Coquitlam Industrial Area have been identified by reviewing historical analytical
data and comparing the results to the applicable BC CSR standards for soil and groundwater, as discussed
in Section 2.0. The following sections list the CoPCs/CoCs on a site-by-site basis.
Relevant information on CoPCs and CoCs potential health effects is provided in Table 15. Figure 2 and
Figure 3 summarizes soil and groundwater CoPCs and CoCs for the sites in the Coquitlam Industrial Area.
5.1 Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal, 2381 Rogers Avenue, Coquitlam
Contaminants of Potential Concern and Contaminants of Concern
The historical soil CoCs identified at the 2381 Rogers Avenue site includes LEPH and HEPH. Prior to the
remedial investigation, the maximum concentrations of LEPH and HEPH were 2,756 µg/g and 24,346 µg/g.
Confirmatory soil samples (20) were submitted for analysis and compared to the applicable BC CSR IL
standards. Of the confirmatory soil samples collected, 2 of the 20 exceeded the BC CSR for HEPH. Soil
exceeding CSR IL standards located beneath a concrete ramp attached to the building, approximately 50 m
north of the right-of-way, was left in place.
One soil sample from the new fill material was also submitted for metals analysis and no exceedances were
identified. It was noted that the volume of soil remaining on-site that exceeds the BC CSR IL standards for
HEPH is approximately 10 m3 and has a low-risk to human health or the environment given the low mobility
and solubility of the contaminants present (ARO 2003). Table 3 shows the soil parameters at 2381 Rogers
Avenue Coquitlam. Given the location of the residual soil (approximately 50 m from the right-of-way), HEPH
in soil is not a CoC for the purposes of the TMEP construction.
TABLE 3
2381 ROGERS AVENUE COQUITLAM SOIL PARAMETERS
BC CSR IL BC CSR CL BC CSR CL CCME CCME CEQG CL

Maximum Schedule 3.1 Schedule 3.1 Protection of Protection of
Measured (Part 1 through (Part 1 through Environmental and Environmental and
Depth Concentration Part 3) Part 3) Human Health Human Health
Parameter (mbgs) (µg/g) (µg/g) (µg/g) (µg/g) (µg/g) CoPC/CoC
HEPH 4 11,676 5,000 5,000 N/A N/A Not Carried Forward
LEPH 3.5-4.8 < 40 2,000 2,000 N/A N/A Not Carried Forward
Note: Bold indicates concentrations exceed the applicable standards
The historical groundwater CoCs identified at the 2381 Rogers Avenue site were LEPH and HEPH.
However, from the most recent groundwater data concentrations of these parameters were all less than BC
CSR IL standards for LEPH and HEPH, and therefore met the applicable standard (ARO 2003). Table 4
shows the groundwater parameters at 2381 Rogers Avenue Coquitlam.
TABLE 4
2381 ROGERS AVENUE COQUITLAM GROUNDWATER PARAMETERS
CCME CEQG
Maximum Measured BC CSR Drinking BC CSR Aquatic Life Protection of Aquatic
Concentration Water (DW) (fresh) (AW) Life
Parameter (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) CoPC/CoC
LEPH < 0.5 N/A 500 N/A Not Carried Forward
HEPH < 1.0 N/A N/A N/A Not Carried Forward
5.2 Former Leeder Landfill, 2080 United Boulevard to 51 Leeder St, Coquitlam,
Based on the refuse materials present in the Former Leeder Landfill summarized in subsection 1.2.2, soil
CoPCs include: metals, hydrocarbons (including BTEX, LEPH, HEPH, PAHs, VPH), PCBs, VOCs, glycols,
phenols (chlorinated and non-chlorinated), perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 13
(PFOA), non-methane organic compounds (NMOC), ions (bromide, fluoride, chloride), total organic carbons
(TOCs) and radioactive materials. Table 5 shows the soil parameters at 2080 United Boulevard to 51
Leeder Street Coquitlam.
TABLE 5
2080 UNITED BOULEVARD TO 51 LEEDER STREET, COQUITLAM SOIL PARAMETERS
CSR CL CCME CCME CEQG CL

BC CSR IL BC CSR CL Protection of Protection of
Maximum Schedule 3.1 Schedule 3.1 Environmental Environmental
Measured (Part 1 through (Part 1 through and Human and Human
Depth Concentration Part 3) Part 3) Health Health
Metals, ions, TOC, - No test results - - - - CoPC
LEPH, HEPH, PAHs, available
PCBs, VOCs, BTEX,
VPH, glycols, phenols
(chlorinated and non-
chlorinated), PFOS,
PFOA, NMOCs,
radioactive materials
The groundwater data from Atwater (1980) reports values for sulfate, iron, manganese and sodium that
exceed the BC CSR IL standard for DW, and iron also exceeds the CCME CEQG. Based on the refuse
materials present in the Former Leeder Landfill summarized in subsection 1.2.2, other CoPCs include:
metals, hydrocarbons (including BTEX, LEPH/HEPH, VPH), PCB, PAHs, VOCs, glycols, phenols
(chlorinated and non-chlorinated), PFOS, PFOA, NMOC, dissolved ions (bromide, fluoride, chloride), TOC
and total dissolved solids (TDS). Table 6 shows the groundwater parameters at 2080 United Boulevard to
51 Leeder Street Coquitlam.
TABLE 6
2080 UNITED BOULEVARD TO 51 LEEDER STREET, COQUITLAM GROUNDWATER PARAMETERS
BC CSR Aquatic CCME CEQG

Maximum Measured Life (fresh) Protection of
Concentration BC CSR DW (AWF) Aquatic Life
Sulfate 974,000 500,000 1,280,000 NA CoC
Iron 28,000 6,500 NA 300 CoC
Manganese 4,920 1,500 NA NA CoC
Sodium 51,900 2,500 NA NA CoC
Metals and dissolved ions, TOC, TDS, Not Tested - - - CoPC
LEPH/HEPH/PAHs, PCBs, VOCs, BTEX,
VPH, glycols, phenols (chlorinated and non-
chlorinated), PFOS, PFOA, NMOCs
5.3 Great Canadian Casinos, 2100 United Boulevard, Coquitlam, Contaminants of

Potential Concern and Contaminants of Concern
Soil and groundwater data are not currently available; however, the site is located near the northwestern corner
of the Former Leeder Landfill footprint and is considered moderate-risk based on the CIAP definition, given that
the background landfill conditions are likely to be encountered (Trans Mountain 2018). It is assumed that CoCs
at the Former Leeder Landfill would be a potential concern at the Great Canadian Casinos site (Section 5.2).
5.4 Former Terra Nova Landfill, 1200 to 1988 United Boulevard, Coquitlam,
The area from 1200 to 1988 United Boulevard, Coquitlam, encompasses the former Terra Nova Landfill
(Figure 4). Background research and field investigations were conducted by Thurber in 1989 (1989a,
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 14
1989b, 1989c). No soil or groundwater chemical data were reported from the monitoring wells installed
during a geotechnical investigation completed by Thurber in 1990 along the TMEP right-of-way (MW-9A/9B
and MW-20; Drawing No. 01 of BGC 2016). Despite the limited information for this area, there are potential
impacts that may require some level of soil and groundwater management during the TMEP right-of-way
construction. These parameters were mentioned in reports written by Thurber (1989a,1989b,1989c).
Based on the refuse materials present in the Former Terra Nova Landfill, described in Section 1.2.4, soil
CoPCs include: metals, hydrocarbons (including BTEX, LEPH, HEPH, PAHs, VPH), PCBs, VOCs, glycols,
phenols (chlorinated and non-chlorinated), PFOS, PFOA, NMOC, ions (bromide, fluoride, chloride), TOC
and radioactive materials. Table 7 shows the soil parameters at 1200 to 1988 United Boulevard Coquitlam.
TABLE 7
1200 TO 1988 UNITED BOULEVARD COQUITLAM SOIL PARAMETERS
CCME CEQG IL CCME CEQG CL

Metals and ions, TOC, - No test results - - - - CoPC
LEPH/HEPH/PAHs, available
PCBs, VOCs, BTEX,
glycols, phenols
(chlorinated and non-
chlorinated), PFOS,
PFOA, NMOCs,
radioactive materials
Recent studies from Golder identified methylene chloride in one groundwater well which was noted to
exceed applicable BC CSR DW standards. Based on the refuse materials present in the Former Terra Nova
Landfill, described in subsection 1.2.4, additional groundwater CoPCs include: metals, hydrocarbons
(including BTEX, LEPH/HEPH, VPH), PCB, PAHs, VOCs, glycols, phenols (chlorinated and non-
chlorinated), PFOS, PFOA, NMOC, dissolved Ions (bromide, fluoride, chloride), TOC, TDS, ammonia and
pesticides. Table 8 shows the groundwater parameters at 1200 to 1988 United Boulevard Coquitlam.
Recent studies from Golder identified methylene chloride in one groundwater well which was noted to
exceed applicable BC CSR DW standards. Based on the refuse materials present in the Former Terra Nova
Landfill, described in subsection 1.2.4, additional groundwater CoPCs include: metals, hydrocarbons
(including BTEX, LEPH/HEPH, VPH), PCB, PAHs, VOCs, glycols, phenols (chlorinated and non-
chlorinated), PFOS, PFOA, NMOC, dissolved Ions (bromide, fluoride, chloride), TOC, TDS, ammonia and
pesticides. Table 8 shows the groundwater parameters at 1200 to 1988 United Boulevard Coquitlam.
TABLE 8
1200 TO 1988 UNITED BOULEVARD COQUITLAM GROUNDWATER PARAMETERS
Maximum BC CSR Aquatic CCME CEQG

Measured BC CSR Drinking Life Protection of
Concentration Water (DW) (fresh) (AW) Aquatic Life
Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 187 100 N/A 98 CoC
Metals and dissolved ions, TOC, TDS, No test results - - - CoPC
LEPH, HEPH, PAHs, PCBs, VOCs, available
BTEX, VPH, glycols, phenols (chlorinated
and non-chlorinated), PFOS, PFOA,
NMOCs), ammonia, pesticides
Former Fraser Mills 8 to 10 King Edward Street, Coquitlam Contaminants of Potential Concern and
Contaminants of Concern
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 15
5.5 Former Fraser Mills 8 to 10 King Edward Street, Coquitlam Contaminants of

Potential Concern and Contaminants of Concern
The soil CoCs identified at the 8 to 10 King Edward site include benzene and metals (arsenic, barium,
cadmium, chromium, copper, lead and zinc) (CH2M 2017). Soil samples were compared to the BC CSR IL
standards. Following a silica gel clean-up analyses on a sample with HEPH concentrations exceeding the
BC CSR IL standard, it was noted that the presence of HEPH in soil is a result of naturally-occurring,
biogenic, hydrocarbons due to the presence of decaying organic matter and not anthropogenic sources
(CH2M 2017). Table 9 shows the soil parameters at 8 to 10 King Edward Street Coquitlam.
TABLE 9
8 TO 10 KING EDWARD STREET COQUITLAM SOIL PARAMETERS

Arsenic 3.5-3.6 19.9 10 10 12 12 CoC
Barium 0.3-0.6 3100 350 350 2,000 2,000 CoC
Cadmium 0.35-1.22 3.03 1 1 22 22 CoC
Chromium 0.3-0.6 58 60 60 87 87 Not Carried
Forward
Copper 0.35-1.22 198 75 75 91 91 CoC
Lead 0.35-1.22 391 120 120 600 260 CoC
Zinc 0.35-1.22 439 150 150 410 410 CoC
HEPH 1.8-1.9 5800 5000 5000 N/A N/A Not Carried
Forward
Benzene 1.8-2.0 0.097 0.035 0.035 Coarse Fine Coarse Fine CoC
0.03 0.0068 0.03 0.0068
The historical groundwater CoC identified at 8 to 10 King Edward Street was chlorobenzene (CH2M 2017). The
VOC concentrations were all less than the laboratory detection limit, with the exception of 1,4-dichlorobenzene
(1.5 µg/g) that had a concentration greater than the BC CSR DW standard; however, with the recent updates to
the BC CSR (Stage 10 and 11), 1,4-dichlorobenzene no longer exceeds the BC CSR DW and AW guideline.
Table 10 shows the groundwater parameters at 8 to 10 King Edward Street Coquitlam.
TABLE 10
8 TO 10 KING EDWARD STREET COQUITLAM GROUNDWATER PARAMETERS
Maximum CCME CEQG

Measured BC CSR Drinking BC CSR Aquatic Protection of
Concentration Water (DW) Life (fresh) (AW) Aquatic Life
VOCs (1,4 – dichlorobenzene) 1.5 5 5 26 Not Carried Forward
5.6 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam (Former Coquitlam Landfill) Contaminants

of Potential Concern and Contaminants of Concern
Historical soil CoCs exceeding the BC CSR IL and CL standards included antimony, arsenic, cadmium,
chromium, copper, lead, mercury, molybdenum, selenium and zinc (Golder 2002). Table 11 summarizes
the maximum soil parameter concentrations for the Former Coquitlam Landfill area.
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 16
TABLE 11
1001 UNITED BOULEVARD COQUITLAM SOIL PARAMETERS

Protection of Protection of
Maximum BC CSR IL BC CSR CL Environmental Environmental
Measured Schedule 3.1 Schedule 3.1 and Human and Human
Depth Concentration (Part 1 through (Part 1 through Health Health
Parameter (mbgs) (µg/g) Part 3) (µg/g) Part 3) (µg/g) (µg/g) (µg/g) CoPC/CoC
Antimony Unknown (Fly Ash) 1,280 40 40 40 40 CoC
Arsenic Unknown (Fly Ash) 293 10 10 12 12 CoC
Cadmium Unknown (Fly Ash) 482 1 1 22 22 CoC
Chromium Unknown (Fly Ash) 430 60 60 87 87 CoC
Copper Unknown (Bottom Ash) 15,900 100 100 91 91 CoC
Lead Unknown (Fly Ash) 7,900 150 150 260 600 CoC
Mercury Unknown (Fly Ash) 93.8 75 75 24 50 CoC
Molybdenum Unknown (Fly Ash) 67.6 15 15 40 40 CoC
Selenium Unknown (Fly Ash) 20.5 1 1 2.9 2.9 CoC
Zinc Unknown (Fly Ash) 24,000 150 150 410 410 CoC
Notes: Bold indicates concentrations exceed the applicable standards
Based on the groundwater monitoring programs completed by AECOM from 2012 to 2017, the following
groundwater CoCs were present at concentrations exceeding the BC CSR AW and DW standards
including: pH, metals (aluminum, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chloride, fluoride, iron, manganese,
vanadium), nitrate, sodium, sulphate, LEPH, EPH10-19, and select PAHs, including acenaphthene, acridine,
anthracene, benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, chrysene, dibenz(a-h)anthracene, fluoranthene,
fluorene, naphthalene, phenanthrene, pyrene, and quinoline (AECOM 2018). Table 12 summarizes
groundwater CoPCs and CoCs for the Former Coquitlam Landfill area.
TABLE 12
1001 UNITED BOULEVARD COQUITLAM GROUNDWATER PARAMETERS

Maximum Measured BC CSR Drinking BC CSR Aquatic Life CCME CEQG Protection
Parameter Concentration (µg/L) Water (DW) (µg/L) (fresh) (AW) (µg/L) of Aquatic Life (µg/L) CoPC/CoC
pH 3.45 N/A N/A 6.5 – 9.0 CoC
Not Carried
Aluminum 150 9,500 N/A N/A
Forward
Arsenic 1,100 10 50 5 CoC
Barium 2,360 1,000 5,000 N/A CoC
Cadmium 1.14 5 0.5 0.09 CoC
Chloride 1,920,000 250,000 1,500,000 120,000 CoC
Fluoride 340 1,500 2,000 120 CoC
Not Carried
Iron 143 6,500 N/A 300
Forward
Manganese 4,000 1,500 N/A N/A CoC
Not Carried
Vanadium 9.3 20 N/A N/A
Forward
Nitrate 17,700 10,000 400,000 13,000 CoC
Sodium 217,000 200,000 N/A N/A CoC
Not Carried
Sulphate 124,000 500,000 1,280,000 N/A
Forward
LEPHw 9,010 N/A 500 N/A CoC
EPHw10-19 14,100 5,000 5,000 N/A CoC
Acenaphthene 348 250 60 5.8 CoC
Acridine 3.7 N/A 0.5 4.4 CoC
Anthracene 6.7 1,000 1 0.012 CoC
Benzo(a)anthracene 3.56 0.07 1 0.018 CoC
Benzo(a)pyrene 1.95 0.01 0.1 0.015 CoC
Chrysene 2.99 7 1 N/A CoC
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.46 0.01 N/A N/A CoC
Fluoranthene 32.6 150 2 0.04 CoC
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 17
TABLE 12 (cont’d)
Maximum Measured BC CSR Drinking BC CSR Aquatic Life CCME CEQG Protection of
Concentration Water (DW) (fresh) (AW) Aquatic Life CoPC/C
Parameter (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) oC
Fluorene 120 150 120 3 CoC
Naphthalene 8,090 80 10 1.1 CoC
Phenanthren
101 N/A 3 0.4 CoC
e
Pyrene 17.5 100 0.2 0.025 CoC
Quinoline 15 0.05 34 3.4 CoC
5.7 Summary of Contaminants of Potential Concern and Contaminants of

Concern
Table 13 provides a summary of soil CoCs and CoPCs identified for the Coquitlam Industrial Area.
TABLE 13
SOIL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN FOR COQUITLAM INDUSTRIAL AREA
Parameter Sites Parameter is a Concern Status of Parameter

HEPH Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal, 2381 CoC
Rogers Avenue, Coquitlam
Former Fraser Mills, 8-10 King Edward Street,
Coquitlam
Arsenic CoC
Cadmium Former Fraser Mills, 8-10 King Edward Street, CoC
Coquitlam
Copper CoC
Coquitlam Landfill, 1001 United Boulevard,
Lead Coquitlam CoC
Zinc CoC
Barium Former Fraser Mills, 8-10 King Edward Street, CoC
Benzene Coquitlam CoC
Antimony CoC
Chromium CoC
Former Coquitlam Landfill, 1001 United
Mercury CoC
Boulevard, Coquitlam
Molybdenum CoC
Selenium CoC
Metals, ions (bromide, fluoride, chloride), TOC, Former Leeder Landfill, 2080 United Boulevard to
LEPH, HEPH, PAHs, PCBs, VOCs, BTEX, VPH, 51 Leeder Street, Coquitlam
CoPC
glycols, phenols, PFOS, PFOA, NMOCs, Former Terra Nova Landfill, 1200 United
radioactive materials Boulevard to 1988 United Boulevard, Coquitlam
Table 14 provides a summary of groundwater CoCs and CoPCs identified for the Coquitlam Industrial Area.
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 18
TABLE 14
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN AND CONTAMINANTS OF POTENTIAL

CONCERN FOR THE COQUITLAM INDUSTRIAL AREA
Parameter Sites Parameter is a Concern Status of Parameter

pH CoC
Arsenic CoC
Barium CoC
Cadmium CoC
Chloride CoC
Fluoride CoC
Nitrate CoC
LEPH, EPH10-19 CoC
EPH10-19 CoC
Acenaphthene CoC
Acridine CoC
Former Coquitlam Landfill, 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam
Anthracene CoC
Benzo(a)anthracene CoC
Benzo(a)pyrene CoC
Chrysene CoC
Dibenz(a-h)anthracene CoC
Fluoranthene CoC
Fluorene CoC
Naphthalene CoC
Phenanthrene CoC
Pyrene CoC
Quinoline CoC
VOCs CoC
Ammonia Former Terra Nova Landfill, 1200 United Boulevard to 1988 United Boulevard, Coquitlam CoPC
Pesticides CoPC
Sulfate CoC
Former Leeder Landfill, 2080 United Boulevard to 51 Leeder Street, Coquitlam
Iron CoC
Manganese Former Coquitlam Landfill, 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam CoC
Sodium Former Leeder Landfill, 2080 United Boulevard to 51 Leeder Street, Coquitlam CoC
Metals and dissolved ions, sulfate,
TOC, TDS, LEPH, HEPH, PAHs,
PCBs, VOCs, BTEX, VPH, glycols, Former Leeder Landfill, 2080 United Boulevard to 51 Leeder Street, Coquitlam
CoPC
phenols [chlorinated and non- Former Terra Nova Landfill, 1200 United Boulevard to 1988 United Boulevard, Coquitlam
chlorinated], PFOS, PFOA, NMOCs),
ammonia, pesticides
As both soil and groundwater CoCs and CoPCs have been identified in the Coquitlam Industrial Area, the
potential exposure pathways would be direct dermal contact, and ingestion. In addition, as some of the
CoCs/CoPCs are volatile, inhalation is also considered a potential exposure pathway. Relevant information
on CoC/CoPC potential health effects is provided in Table 15.
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 19
TABLE 15
CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN POTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECTS
Contaminant
Present in
Soil or
Basis Potential Health Effects Groundwater Potential Exposure
CoC Guideline (Health Canada 2017) or Both Volatile? Pathway
pH Not listed Not listed Groundwater Not applicable Groundwater
Antimony Health-based Microscopic changes in organs and tissues Soil Not Volatile Soil
MAC (thymus, kidney, liver, spleen, thyroid)
Arsenic Health-based Cancer (lung, bladder, liver, skin) (classified as Both Not volatile Soil and Groundwater
MAC human carcinogen). Skin, vascular and neurological
effects (numbness and tingling of extremities)
Barium Health-based Increases in blood pressure, cardiovascular disease Both Not volatile Soil and Groundwater
MAC
Cadmium Health-based Kidney damage and softening of bone Both Not Volatile Soil and Groundwater
MAC
Chloride Not listed Not listed Groundwater Not Volatile Groundwater
Chromium Health-based Enlarged liver, irritation of the skin, respiratory Soil Not Volatile Soil
MAC and gastrointestinal tracts from chromium (VI)
Chromium (III) is an essential element
Copper Aesthetic Copper is an essential element in human Soil Not Volatile Soil
Objective metabolism. Adverse health effects occur at
levels much higher than the aesthetic objective
Fluoride Health-based Moderate dental fluorosis Groundwater Not Volatile Groundwater
MAC
Iron Not listed None Groundwater Not Volatile Groundwater
Lead Health-based Biochemical and neuro-behavioural effects Soil Not Volatile Soil
MAC (intellectual development, behaviour). Anaemia,
central nervous system effects, classified as
probably carcinogenic to humans
Manganese Not listed Not listed Groundwater Not Volatile Groundwater
Mercury Health-based Irreversible neurological symptoms Soil Slightly at room Soil
MAC temperature
Molybdenum Not listed Not listed Soil Not Volatile Soil
Selenium Health-based Chronic selenosis symptoms in humans Soil Not Volatile Soil
MAC following exposure to high levels. Hair loss, tooth
decay, weakened nails and nervous system
disturbances at extremely high levels of
exposure
Sodium Not listed Not listed Groundwater Not Volatile Groundwater
Zinc Not listed Not listed Soil Not Volatile Soil
HEPH Not listed Not listed Soil Volatile Vapour and Soil
LEPH Not listed Not listed Both Volatile Vapour, Soil and
Groundwater
EPHw 10-19 Not listed Not listed Groundwater Volatile Vapour and
Groundwater
Acenaphthene Not listed Not listed Groundwater Not Volatile Groundwater
Acridine Not listed Not listed Groundwater Not Volatile Groundwater
Anthracene Not listed Not listed Groundwater Not Volatile Groundwater
Benzo(a)anthracene Not listed Not listed Groundwater Not Volatile Groundwater
Benzo(a)pyrene Health-based Stomach tumours (classified as human Groundwater Not Volatile Groundwater
MAC carcinogen)
Chrysene Not listed Not listed Groundwater Not Volatile Groundwater
Dibenz(a- Not listed Not listed Groundwater Not Volatile Groundwater
h)anthracene
Fluoranthene Not listed Not listed Groundwater Not Volatile Groundwater
Fluorene Not listed Not listed Groundwater Not Volatile Groundwater
Naphthalene Not listed Not listed Both Volatile Vapour, Soil and
Groundwater
Phenanthrene Not listed Not listed Both Not Volatile Soil and Groundwater
Pyrene Not listed Not listed Groundwater Not Volatile Groundwater
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 20
TABLE 15 Cont’d
Contaminant
Present in
Soil or
Potential Health Effects Groundwater Potential Exposure
CoC Basis Guideline (Health Canada 2017) or Both Volatile? Pathway
Quinoline Not listed Not listed Groundwater Not Volatile Groundwater
Dichloromethane Health-based Liver effects (liver foci and areas of cellular Groundwater Volatile Vapour and
MAC and Other alteration). Classified as probable Groundwater
carcinogen.
*Chlorobenzene Not listed Not listed Groundwater Volatile Vapour and
Groundwater
Benzene Health-based Human carcinogen; blood, immunological Soil Volatile Vapour and Soil
MAC effects
Toluene Health-based Adverse neurological effects, including Both Volatile Vapour and
MAC and Other vibration thresholds, colour discrimination, Groundwater
auditory thresholds, attention, memory and
psychomotor functions
Insufficient information to determine whether
toluene is carcinogenic to humans.
Ethylbenzene Health-based Effects on the liver and pituitary gland. Both Volatile Vapour and
MAC and Other Tumour formation at various sites in animals, Groundwater
including kidney, lung, liver and testes.
Xylene Health-based Adverse neuromuscular effects Both Volatile Vapour and
MAC and Other Insufficient information to determine whether Groundwater
xylenes are carcinogenic to humans.
Tetrachloroethylene Health-based Neurological effects (colour confusion) in Both Volatile Vapour and
MAC and Other humans Groundwater
Classified as probably carcinogenic to humans,
based on sufficient evidence in experimental
animals and limited evidence in humans
Nitrate Health-based Methemoglobinemia (blue baby syndrome) Groundwater Not Volatile Groundwater
MAC and effects on thyroid gland function in bottle-
fed infants. Classified as possible carcinogen
under conditions that result in endogenous
nitrosation
Ammonia Other Levels of ammonia, either naturally present in Groundwater Volatile Vapour and
the source water or added as part of a Groundwater
disinfection strategy, can affect water quality
in the distribution system (e.g., nitrification)
and should be monitored.
TDS Not listed Not listed Groundwater Not Volatile Groundwater
TOC Not listed Not listed Both Volatile Vapour, Soil and
Groundwater
Sulfate Other High levels (above 500 mg/L) can cause Groundwater Not Volatile Groundwater
physiological effects such as diarrhoea or
dehydration
Pesticides Not listed Not listed Groundwater Volatile Vapour and
Groundwater
PAHs Not listed Not listed Both Volatile Vapour, Soil and
Groundwater
VOCs Not listed Not listed Both Volatile Vapour, Soil and
Groundwater
PCBs Not listed Not listed Groundwater Volatile Vapour and
Groundwater
Phenols Not listed Not listed Both Volatile Vapour, Soil and
Groundwater
Glycols Not listed Not listed Both Volatile Vapour, Soil and
Groundwater
PFOS Not listed Not listed Both Not Volatile Soil and Groundwater
PFOA Not listed Not listed Both Not Volatile Soil and Groundwater
NMOCs Not listed Not listed Both Volatile Vapour, Soil and
Groundwater
Radioactive materials Not listed Not listed Soil Not Volatile Vapour and Soil
Notes: * dichlorobenzene
MAC = maximum acceptable concentration
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 21
6.0 CONSTRUCTION FOOTPRINT WITHIN COQUITLAM INDUSTRIAL AREA

This Site-Specific Management Plan summarizes the findings of previous investigations conducted at the
Coquitlam Industrial Area to provide direction regarding how to manage the soil and groundwater impacts that
may be encountered during the construction phase of the TMEP located in close proximity to and/or within the
Coquitlam Industrial Area.
The extent of the planned TMEP right-of-way within the Coquitlam Industrial Area is shown in Figure 2
through Figure 4. Spatially from east to west, the planned TMEP right-of-way footprint is located adjacent
to the south of the Former Lougheed Warehouse and terminal site, runs through the Former Leeder Landfill,
approximately 80 m south of the Great Canadian Casino site, runs through the Former Terra Nova Landfill,
runs through northern end of the Former Fraser Mills site and then runs through the eastern and northern
ends of the Former Coquitlam Landfill site.
Two options under current consideration for construction of the pipeline through the Coquitlam Industrial
Area are: (1) trenching; and/or (2) a trenchless installation method (e.g., Guided Horizontal Auger Bore
[GHAB], etc).
The trenching construction method would use Nominal Pipe Size (NPS) of 36-inches, or 914 mm. Based
on the previously mentioned NPS specifications, a trench approximately 2.25-m-wide, 3-m-deep and
4,375-m-long would be required for constructing the pipeline in the Coquitlam Industrial Area. Adding
approximately 30% to the volume to account for the lateral extensions/pipe curvature, an estimated volume
of soil to be excavated for pipeline installation in in the Coquitlam Industrial Area is approximately
38,400 m3. Note, the 4,375 m length was calculated along the TMEP right-of-way from the east side of the
Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal Site, to the northwestern portion of the Former Coquitlam
Landfill, along the TMEP right-of-way. A geotechnical (BGC 2016) report discusses foundation options to
support the planned pipeline where it crosses over waste, to limit or prevent settlement. These options
include: floating of pipe in/over waste; excavation/replacement of waste down to native competent soils and
localised supporting of the pipe on stone columns or pile foundations (BGC 2016).
The trenchless installation method would involve a cylindrical bore with diameter of either 36 inches
(0.914 m) or 42 inches (1.066 m) over portions of the 4,375-m length of installation within the Coquitlam
Industrial Area. Based on the cylindrical bore diameter used, the approximate volume of soil to be removed
from the Coquitlam Industrial Area is 2870 m3 for a 36-inch diameter and 3,905 m3 for a 42-inch diameter.
Note, as with the trenching method, the 4,375 m length was calculated along the TMEP right-of-way from
the east side of the Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal Site, to the northwestern portion of the
Former Coquitlam Landfill, along the TMEP right-of-way. Use of this method would reduce the total
estimated excavation volume calculated for the trenched method for the segments where it may be
employed.
6.1 Groundwater Monitoring Well Decommissioning and New Well Placement

There are 9 groundwater monitoring wells, 2 gas probes and 12 gas wells located within or near the planned
TMEP construction right-of-way footprint (45-m temporary width) including temporary workspace (Figures
2 through Figure 4). Table 16 identifies the existing monitoring wells located within the temporary workspace
or planned centreline. If a monitoring and/or gas well was identified within the planned centreline of the
TMEP, it was identified as a potential required re-location . However, if a monitoring and/or gas well was
identified within a temporary workspace, it was not identified as potential required re-location.
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 22
TABLE 16
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS LOCATIONS

Potential Relocation
Well ID Location Type Site Location Relative to TMEP Required
MW-20 Monitoring Well 1200 United Boulevard to 1988 United Boulevard, Temporary workspace No
Coquitlam (Former Terra Nova Landfill)
MW-9A/9B Monitoring Well 1200 United Boulevard to 1988 United Boulevard, Temporary workspace No
Coquitlam (Former Terra Nova Landfill)
16MWC-1 Monitoring Well 8-10 King Edward Street (Former Fraser Mills) Planned Centreline Yes
MW01-3 Monitoring Well 8-10 King Edward Street (Former Fraser Mills) Planned Centreline Yes
MW99-3I Monitoring Well 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam Temporary workspace Status unknown or lost
(Former Coquitlam Landfill)
MW99-3S Monitoring Well 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam Temporary workspace Status unknown or lost
MW95-6D Monitoring Well 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam Temporary workspace No
MW01-3 Monitoring Well 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam Southwest of Temporary workspace Status unknown or lost
MW00-9 Monitoring Well 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam No
Southwest of Temporary workspace
MW-J Monitoring Well 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam Northeast of Temporary workspace No
MW99-4I Monitoring Well 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam Northeast of Temporary workspace No
MW99-4D Monitoring Well 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam Northeast of Temporary workspace No
MW-K Monitoring Well 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam Northeast of Temporary workspace No
GW-101 Gas Well 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam Temporary workspace No
GW-107 Gas Well 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam Planned Centreline Yes
GW-109 Gas Well 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam Planned Centreline Yes
GP-28 Gas Probe 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam Temporary workspace No
GP-16 Gas Probe 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam Planned Centreline Yes
Depending upon the state of the wells and in consultation with the well owners, re-location or
decommissioning (temporarily or permanently), or both, may be required to facilitate construction activities.
Re-location (if applicable) may depend upon the construction method used (excavation and trenching or
trenchless), and Trans Mountain Operations requirements for placing groundwater monitoring wells in
proximity to the TMEP pipeline.
For the Coquitlam landfill, Metro Vancouver is required to conduct water quality monitoring in accordance
with the BC ENV landfill permit (PR-4385) (AECOM 2018), which was issued in 1976 and amended in 1980;
therefore, monitoring wells may require re-location to maintain compliance with the monitoring permit.
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 23
511000 511500 512000 512500 513000
Glacier St
KP (ADDRESS) SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS (SOIL) RECOMMENDED ANALYSES (SOIL)
5453500
5453500
Kaptey Ave p
am
1168.85 to 1169.15
f fr FIGURE 2
O
lvd
(Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal Chance find protocol LEPH/HEPH
B COQUITLAM EAST AREA SOIL AND
y d
Hw ite
GROUNDWATER COCS
2381 Rogers Avenue)
r
1169.35 to 1170.0
e ed Un e n D - One soil sample Primary: pH, metals LEPH/HEPH/PAHs,
old per metre of depth
gh
Characterization Sampling
ou for every 50 m Glength
Former Leeder Landfill VOCs, BTEX, VPH,
e
L
Av
(2080 United Boulevard to 51 Leeder Street)
M
Bru
n
Monitoring Well Location
r
1169.9 to 1170.01+7 Secondary: ions, TOC, PCBs, glycols,
Ho
S
T
net
pe
(Great Canadian Casino Chance find protocol phenols (chlorinated and non- .
! Kilometre Post (KP)
te
Ca
2100 United Boulevard) chlorinated), PFOS, PFOA, NMOCs,
Ave
7 (
! 100m Kilometre Post (KP)
Tr ans-Canad
O
P Primary: pH, metals LEPH/HEPH/PAHs,
a Hw y
COQU ITLAM VOCs, BTEX, VPH, Proposed Centreline
1
O
P Trans Mountain
1170.0 to 1171.85 Existing Pipeline (TMPL)
Trans-Ca
Characterization Sampling - One soil sample Secondary: ions, TOC, PCBs, glycols,
nada Hw (Former Terra Nova Landfill
y Offramp 1200 United Boulevard to 1988 United Boulevard)
for every 50 m length per metre depth phenols (chlorinated and non- Easement
chlorinated), PFOS, PFOA, NMOCs, Extra Temporary Workspace
gamma spectroscopy analysis
5453000
5453000
Hwy 7
Temporary Workspace
(
! O fframp
(
! TMEP Defined High Risk
KP 1171
(
! Contaminated Site Area
Hw y
7B O
(
!
MW-20
ffr am p
.
!
(
TMEP Defined Low Risk
Tran
(
!
Contaminated Site Area
s
M -Can
(
!
1+7B
ada T
S
(
!
Hwy (1
! Highway
Former Terra O nram
Nova Landfill p Paved Road
1200 to 1988
(
!
United Boulevard,
Uni
Secondary Road
Coquitlam (approx.) te
(
!
Great Canadian Casino dB

lvd Railway
Dr
Site ID 9109
(
!
.
!
(
Former Terra Hartley 2100 United Boulevard, Coquitlam

Ave Po
e
(
!
River, Creek or Stream
Brigantin
Nova Landfill rt
1200 to 1988 Ma
nn
City / Town
Leeder St
(
!
United Boulevard, Br
(
! (
!
Coquitlam (approx.) id
(
! (
!
(
!
!
. Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal ge Projection: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 10N.
KP 1170
(
! (
! (
! (
! (
!
Site ID 8345
(
! Monitoring Well Location: CH2M 2019;
Pipeline KPs, Centreline & Footprint: SSEID005.14 (Spread 7)
2381 Rogers Ave (
! provided by UPI Oct 26, 2018; TMPL Route Revision 0 provided by
KMC, May 2012;
( Transportation: BC MFLNRO 2012 & NRCan
!
5452500
5452500
2015; Geopolitical Boundaries: MMAH 2016; Service Layer
C om
Fawcett Rd
(
! Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar
Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and
Former Leeder Landfill
(
!
the GIS User Community.
o Cr
(
!
2080 United Boulevard
(
!
This document is provided by Kinder Morgan Canada Inc. (KMC) for use by
to 51 Leeder Street
.
!
KP 1169
(
! (
! (
! ( (
! (
!
the intended recipient only. This information is confidential and proprietary
e ek
to KMC and is not to be provided to any other recipient without the written
consent of KMC. It is not to be used for legal, engineering or surveying
purposes, nor for doing any work on or around KMC's pipelines and
facilities, all of which require KMC's prior written approval.
e
lan
m ed
u nna Although there is no reason to believe that there are any errors associated
with the data used to generate this product or in the product itself, users of
these data are advised that errors in the data may be present.
BRITISH ALBERTA
COLUMBIA
Dawson Grande
Creek Prairie !2
(
(
!
97 (
!
43
Fraser River Prince Edmonton

KP (ADDRESS) RECOMMENDED ANALYSES (GROUNDWATER) SECONDARY ANALYSES (GROUNDWATER) EXPECTED GROUNDWATER LEVEL Notes:
George
(
! Hinton
Edson
16
5452000
5452000
1168.85 to 1169.15 1. The recommended groundwater analyses may be adjusted Quesnel Red
Valemount Jasper Deer
(Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal No CoCs identified LEPH/HEPH 2.2 masl based on soil analytical results. Blue River
2381 Rogers Avenue) Williams (2
!
Lake Calgary
BTEX: benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene
(
!
97
Darfield (1
!
HEPH/LEPH: heavy/light extractable petroleum hydrocarbons
1169.35 to 1170.0 Kamloops
Former Leeder Landfill pH, metals and dissolved ions, sulfate, TOC, masl: metre(s) above sea level Kelowna
(2080 United Boulevard to 51 Leeder Street) TDS, LEPH/HEPH/PAHs, PCBs, VOCs, BTEX,
None 3.0 - 4.0 masl NMOC: non-methane organic compounds Vancouver
(Burnaby) Hope
(3
!
VPH, glycols, phenols (chlorinated and non- NORM: naturally occurring radioactive materials USA
1169.9 to 1170.0 chlorinated), PFOS, PFOA, NMOCs PAHs: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
SURR EY
MAP NUMBER PAGE
(Great Canadian Casino PCBs: polychlorinated biphenyls 201905_MAP_CH2M_CS_01135_REVA_FIG2 SHEET 1 OF 1
2100 United Boulevard) PFOS/PFOA: perfluorooctane sulfonate/perfluorooctanoic acid
DATE CH2M REF. REVISION
December 2019 CE733700 A
1170.0 to 1171.85
pH, metals and dissolved ions, TOC, TDS, TDS: total dissolved solids SCALE PAGE SIZE DISCIPLINE
LEPH/HEPH/PAHs, PCBs, VOCs, BTEX, VPH, TOCl: total organic carbon

1:7,500 11x17 CS
(Former Terra Nova Landfill Pesticides, ammonia 3.0 - 4.0 masl
glycols, phenols (chlorinated and non- VOC: volatile organic compounds
DRAWN CHECKED DESIGN
1200 United Boulevard to 1988 United Boulevard) DJN KA CMR

chlorinated), PFOS, PFOA, NMOCs m
0 50 100 150
511000 511500 512000 512500 513000 ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE
509000 509500 510000 510500 511000
k
KP (ADDRESS) SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS (SOIL) RECOMMENDED ANALYSES (SOIL)
ee
Cr
Dr P r
im a r
y:p
H,m eta lsL E
PH/
HEP
H/P
AHs,
t ar r
th
FIGURE 3
e S
Boo
King Edward St
ill V OCs ,
BTEX,
VP H,
L uc
Ave
COQUITLAM WEST AREA SOIL AND
Brunette Ave tte 1
170.0to1 17 1.
85 GROUNDWATER COCS
O nr Brune Characterization Sampling - One soil sample Seco n da r y:ions , T OC, P CBs ,glyco
ls,
am (
For
m erT er
ra Nova L a n dfill TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT
Schoolhouse St
p for every 50 m length per metre depth phen o ls( chlorin a ted a n d n on-
(
!
1
200U n ited Bouleva rd to1 9 8
8U n ited Bo
uleva r
d)
L ou chlo rin a ted),P FOS, P FOA, NMOCs , M Mon itor
in g WellL oca tion
Tupper Ave ghe
e
(
!
d Hw ga m m a s pectro s co py a n a lys
is
y Ga sWellL oca tion
(
!
)
È
1 17 1.85to1 1 7
2 .0 7 #
* Ga sPr
ob e L oca tion
Characterization Sampling - One soil sample
(
!
P
O
5453500
5453500
(Fo rm erF r
as erMills Metals, BTEX Kilom etr
e Pos
t(KP)
Br une t for every 50 m length per metre of depth .
!
t e Ave 8– 1 0K in g E dwa r d Str eet)
(
!
Offr am 100m Kilom etr

e Pos
t(KP)
p 1 17 2.3to1 1 7 3
.2
(
!
(
!
1
Characterization Sampling - One soil sample Pr
opos
ed Cen tr
elin e
GP-16 O
P (Fo rm erCo q uitla m L a n dfill Metals
for every 50 m length per metre of depth
1 00 WUonoilrted
1 T
ra n sMoun ta in
(
!
MW-K Trans-C id gBeouleva r
St
d) E
xis tin g Pipelin e (
TMPL)
#
* MW99-4D anada H
(
! (
! GW-117
MW-J wy Eas
em en t
KP 1173 MMM
.
!
(
)
È # MW99-4I Como Cree k Extr
a Tem por
ary Wor
kspa ce
*)
È È
)M
(
!
GW-119
) È
) )
È È
(
!
(
!
GW-109 GW-056 Tem por
ary Wor
kspace
GP-28
)
È)
GW-115
È) GW-113
GW-111
(
!
(
!
GW-103
TMEPDefin ed High Ris
Con ta m in a ted Site Ar
k
ea
È)
È GW-107
!1
( Highwa y
GW-064
)
È GW-102
(
!
MW99-3I-3S MW01-3* T
S7B+1
Tr ans-
Paved Roa d
)
È 16MW-C-1 C anad Secon da r
y Roa d
GW-101 a Hw y Offr a
MM M MMM mp
(
! (
!
(
!
Railwa y
MM
(
! .
!
( (
!
MW01-3 MW95-6D 16MW-C-3
16MW-C-2 River
,Cr
eek orStr
ea m
Former Terra
(
!
5453000
5453000
MW00-9
Nova Landfill
Br lvd City /Tow n
Unite d B
(
!
a id
St
1200 to 1988
United Boulevard,
(
!
M (
!
* MW01-3: Possible location,
Former Coquitlam Landfill
(
!
Coquitlam (approx.) (
!
KP 1171 no GPS points provided
Nelson C ree k Site ID 2194 MW-9A/9B
COQU ITLAM
(
!
iver 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam

.
!
(
Pr
ojection : NAD1983U T M Z on e 10N.
Site ID 7829
te R
(
!
( Mon itor in g WellL oca tion :CH2M 2 017;
ne t Former Fraser Mills
!
Ga sWell, Ga sPr ob e L oca tion :CH2M 2019;
B ru 8-10 King Edward Street, Coquitlam pr
Pipelin e KPs,Cen tr
ovided b y U PIOct26,
elin e &F
2018
ootpr
;T
in t:SSE I
D0
MPL Route Revis
05. 14(Spr
ion 0pr
ea d 7)
ovided b y
KMC, Ma y 2012; T r
ans por ta tion :BCMF L NRO2012&NRCa n
Former Terra 2015;
Cr
Geopolitica lBoun da r
edits:Sour ce: Es ri,
ies :
MMAH20
Digita lGlob e, GeoE
16;Ser
ye,
vice L a yer
Earthsta r
Nova Landfill Geogr a phics ,CNE S/Air b usDS, U SDA, U SGS,Aer oGRI D,I GN,a n d
1200 to 1988
the GI SU s erCom m un ity.
United Boulevard, This document is provided by Kinder Morgan Canada Inc. (KMC) for use by
Coquitlam (approx.)
to KMC and is not to be provided to any other recipient without the written
NEW consent of KMC. It is not to be used for legal, engineering or surveying
Dr
WES TMINSTER
e
Brigantin
Although there is no reason to believe that there are any errors associated
5452500
5452500
BRITISH ALBERTA
COLUMBIA
Dawson Grande
Creek Prairie !2
(
(
!
97 (
!
43
Prince
George
Edmonton
Sapperton Channel Notes: (
!
16 Hinton
Edson
1.T he recom m en ded gr oun dw a tera n a lys
esm a y b e a djus
ted Quesnel
Valemount Jasper
Red
Deer
ba s
ed on soila n a lytica lr
esults. Blue River
Williams (2
!
Lake Calgary
BTEX: b en zen e, toluen e,ethylb en zen e, xylen e
(
!
97
Darfield (1
!
KP (ADDRESS) RECOMMENDED ANALYSES (GROUNDWATER) SECONDARY ANALYSES (GROUNDWATER) EXPECTED GROUNDWATER LEVEL
HEPH/LEPH: hea vy/ lightextr a cta b le petroleum hydr oca r b on s
Kamloops
pH,m eta lsa n d dissolved ions ,TOC,TDS,
1170.0to1171. 85 Frase r Rive r masl: m etr e(s )a b ove s ea level Kelowna
L EPH/ HEPH/ PAHs ,PCBs ,V OCs ,BTEX,V PH,
(F
orm erTer ra Nova L a n dfill
glycols ,phen ols( chlorin a ted a n d n on-
Pesticides,a m m onia 3.
0-4.
0m a s
l NMOC: n on - m etha n e or ga n ic com poun ds Vancouver
(Burnaby) Hope
(3
!
1200U n ited Bouleva rd to1988U n ited Bouleva r
d) NORM: n a tur a lly occur rin g r a dioa ctive m a ter ia ls USA
m xd
chlorin a ted)
,PF OS,PF OA,NMOCs
ig3.
1171.85to1172. 0 PAHs: polycyclic a r om a tic hydr oca r b on s

35_ RevA_ F
MAPNU MBER PAGE
(F
orm erF r
aserMills NoCoCsiden tified V OCs 3.
5m a s
l PCBs: polychlor in a ted b iphen yls 2
019
05_ MAP
_CH2
M_ C
S_ 0
113
5_R
EV A_F
IG3 SHEET1OF1
PFOS/PFOA: per fluor oocta n e s ulfon a te/ perfluor oocta n oic a cid
DATE CH2M REF
. REV I
SION
8– 10Kin g Edwa r d Street) Decem b er2019 CE733700 A
_ MAP_ CH2M_ CS_ 011
1172.3to1173. 2 pH,m eta lsa n d dissolved ions ,n itra te, TDS: tota ldis solved s olids SCAL E PAGESI
ZE DI
SCI
PLI
NE
1:
7,500 11x17 CS
L EPH/ HEPH/ PAHs TOCl: tota lor ga n ic ca r b on
5452000
5452000
(F
orm erCoquitla m L a n dfill Sulpha te 0.
7-2.
4m a s
l DRAWN CHE
CKED DESI
GN
1001U n ited Bouleva rd) VOC: vola tile or ga n ic com poun ds DJ
N KA CMR
SURR EY m
0 50 100 150
01905
509000 509500 510000 510500 511000 ALL L OCATI

ONS APPROXI
MATE
2
509000 509500 510000 510500 511000 511500 512000 512500 513000
¯
Quadling Ave
k
ree
r es
Begin St
dC
C
e
Blue Mountain St
FIGURE 4
an
Av
l
Alderson Ave o
n ti
na
cD
Schoolhouse St
Ma L aure
us
FORMER LANDFILL FOOTPRINTS
o
am
Montgomery St
r
oD
Sic
5454000
5454000
nt
re
l Rd
r
So
Ave eek Hil M
ette Boo s
Monitoring Well Location
Ne
Cr e
Brun th Ave Da
w
lson Creek
King Edward St
)
È Gas Well Location
h
ot
Bo
#
* Gas Probe Location
r Dr
St ar .
! Kilometre Post (KP)
L ou g
Mundy St
Finnigan St
e
p
100m Kilometre Post (KP)
he e
cill
(
!
Tuppe d Hw am
r Ave ffr
e
(
!
Lu
e
y
mp d O
Av
Proposed Centreline
Av
ffr a
(
!
lv
o rn
ey
Trans Mountain
O
Ka dB
5453500
5453500
Brunet 7
(
!
pt
te
Existing Pipeline (TMPL)
H
Ave O y it e
ffr am p Hw Un
pe
(
!
TMEP Defined Low Risk
Ca
1
Woolrid
(
!
O
P ge
(
! St
#
* TMEP Defined High Risk
KP 1173 !
MM
(
! (
!
Como Creek
1+7
.
)
È#
ÈM
(
!
*)
È)È)
È
(
!
S
T
Golden Dr
(
!
)
È) )
È)
È)
(
!
(
!
Trans-Can
ada Hwy
7
O
P
Coquitlam Landfill (former)
È)
(
!
Terra Nova Landfill (former)
È
)
È
)
È
(
!
KP 1172
( Former Terra 7B+1 Trans-Can
Leeder Landfill (former)
T
S ada Hw y Offram
Br iv
MM
M MM
MM Nova!( Landfill (1
! Highway
er
p
(
! !
aid R
(
!
.
!
tte 1200 to 1988
(
! (
!
St e United Boulevard,!(
Paved Road
5453000
5453000
un
(
!
Site ID 2194 United

Blvd
Coquitlam (approx.) M
(
!
KP 1171
Secondary Road
Br
(
!
(
!
Hwy 7
(
!
B
(
!
Railway
Former Coquitlam Landfill Offramp
.
!
(
!
Site ID 7829
M
(
!
1001 United Former Terra
(
!
Former Fryer Mills
(
! River, Creek or Stream
Boulevard, Coquitlam Nova Landfill
8-10 King Edward Street, Coquitlam Tran
1200 to 1988 s -Can
City / Town
ad a Hw y Onr am p
(
!
United Boulevard,
Dr
Coquitlam (approx.) Site ID 9109 Projection: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 10N.
e
Great Canadian Casino Site ID 8345
Brigantin
NEW
Monitoring Well Location: CH2M 2017;
2100 United Boulevard, Coquitlam

(
! Gas Well, Gas Probe Location: CH2M 2019;
Har tley A Former Lougheed
Leeder St
W E S TM I N S T E R
Pipeline KPs, Centreline: SSEID005.14 (Spread 7) provided by UPI
ve Warehouse and Terminal

(
! Oct 26, 2018; TMPL Route Revision 0 provided by KMC, May
(
!
COQU ITLAM
(
! 2012; Transportation: BC MFLNRO 2012 & NRCan 2015;
2381 Rogers Ave
(
!
.
! Geopolitical Boundaries: MMAH 2016; Service Layer Credits:
KP 1170
(
! (
! (
! (
! (
! (
! Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics,
Fawcett Rd
CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User
5452500
5452500
Community.
This document is provided by Kinder Morgan Canada Inc. (KMC) for use by
(
!
(
!
(
!
!
. to KMC and is not to be provided to any other recipient without the written
KP 1169
(
! (
! (
! (
! (
! (
!
consent of KMC. It is not to be used for legal, engineering or surveying
nnel
to n C ha
Sapper
Former Leeder Landfill
2080 United
Boulevard
to 51 Leeder Street Although there is no reason to believe that there are any errors associated
BRITISH ALBERTA
COLUMBIA
5452000
5452000
Dawson Grande
Creek Prairie !2
(
(
!
97 (
!
43
Prince
George
Edmonton
(
! Hinton
Edson
16
Quesnel Red
er
Fraser Riv
Valemount Jasper Deer
Blue River
Williams (2
!
Lake Calgary
(
!
97
Darfield (1
!
SURR EY
Kamloops
Kelowna
5451500
5451500
Vancouver (3
!
(Burnaby) Hope
USA
Ba rk er Cree k
MAP NUMBER PAGE

201905_MAP_CH2M_CS_01135_REVA_FIG4 SHEET 1 OF 1
DATE CH2M REF. REVISION
December 2019 CE733700 A
17
King Rd O
P SCALE
1:12,500
PAGE SIZE
11x17
DISCIPLINE
CS
116 Ave Hwy 1 7
DRAWN
DR
CHECKED
DJN
DESIGN
CMR
115B Ave
m
0 100 200 300
509000 509500 510000 510500 511000 511500 512000 512500 513000 ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE
6.2 Data Review – Conclusions

Extensive documentation, sampling and reporting was available and has been completed at some of the
sites in the Coquitlam Industrial Area. The TMEP right-of-way does not pass through the Former Lougheed
Warehouse and Terminal site or the Great Canadian Casino site. The TMEP right-of-way passes directly
through the Former Leeder and Tera Nova Landfill, and on the northern end of the Former Fraser Mills and
Former Coquitlam Landfill. Both the Former Fraser Mills and Former Coquitlam Landfill sites have had
previous intrusive investigations, providing information with respect to CoPCs and CoCs (the
concentrations, nature and extent). Limited historical information was available for the Former Leeder and
Tera Nova Landfill, and the concentrations and nature and extent of CoPCs in soil and groundwater within
the 12-m-wide TMEP right-of-way has not been specifically investigated.
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 27
7.0 CONSTRUCTION PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND MITIGATION

7.1 Site Preparation Prior to Construction for Contaminants of Potential Concern
Given the historical use of the sites identified as moderate or high risk, there is a moderate or high likelihood
that contaminated material will be encountered during construction. Contaminated soil material excavated
from the Coquitlam Industrial Area will be disposed of at an off-site licensed waste receiving facility. To
prepare for efficient management of this anticipated material, advanced characterization of the material
will be conducted during the underground utility locates and daylighting operations along the right-of-way
in the pre-construction phase. Given the potential for encountering contamination within the landfill
segments, sampling of soils from these sections of the right-of-way for field screening and select CoC and
CoPC analyses and landfill characterization will facilitate determination of soil disposal options. CoPCs and
CoCs to be analyzed for characterization of the sites are listed in Table 17. At select landfill sites, primary
and secondary sample analytical parameters are indicated in Table 17. Select representative samples will
be analyzed for both primary and secondary parameters at those locations; however, the results of
these analyses will allow subsequent selection of only CoCs and exclusion of CoPCs determined to be of
no or low potential concern.
Loading segregated contaminated soil directly into trucks or roll-off bins for off-site disposal (also referred
to as hot loading) is the preferred handling procedure for managing excavated contaminated material.
To prevent further potential contamination and/or cross-contamination of soil and groundwater at the
Coquitlam Industrial Area, an equipment decontamination process is recommended during construction
activities. Standard equipment sanitation is recommended, and which will include mechanical removal of
packed dirt, grit and debris by scraping and brushing, in accordance with the requirements in the Pipeline
Environmental Protection Plan (CER Condition 72).
If temporary stockpiling of contaminated soil is necessary during construction, the following should be taken
into account:
• Health and Safety Considerations: CoCs/CoPCs are present in soil and groundwater at the Coquitlam
Industrial Area oil particles may migrate off-site during a large rainfall and/or snowmelt event or may be
blown off-site in dry weather. Durable polyethylene or vinyl tarp material should be available to cover
any contaminated material stockpiles , with sandbags or other heavy items to sufficiently weigh down
the tarps and prevent blow-away.
• Stockpile Regulatory Considerations: signage, fencing, containment, sloping and covering of stockpile
materials must comply with applicable Project and regulatory requirements.
Groundwater levels for the shallows aquifer (approximately 4-m-thick) are as follows: 2.2 masl for the
Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal site; 3.0 to 4.0 masl for the Former Leeder Landfill (including
the Great Canadian Casino site) and Terra Nova Landfill footprints; 3.5 masl for the Former Fraser Mills
site; and 0.7 masl to 2.4 masl at the Former Coquitlam Landfill. A holding tank for potential temporary
storage of groundwater may need to be placed on-site during construction activities. Options to manage
contaminated groundwater encountered during excavation include removal using a vacuum truck and
disposal off-site at a licensed waste receiving facility, as necessary, or on-site water treatment systems.
For small volumes, vacuum truck and disposal is preferred, however in the case of high-water quantities,
on-site treatment may be the preferred option.
7.2 Regulatory Criteria and Exposure Pathways

CoCs can pose a risk to human health via a variety of exposure pathways, including direct contact (e.g.,
ingestion, dermal contact) and vapour inhalation. The governing human exposure pathways for potential
contact with contaminated soil and groundwater are ingestion and dermal contact for all CoCs at the
Coquitlam Industrial Area, in addition to inhalation for the volatile CoCs.
Risks due to incidental ingestion or dermal contact of soil or groundwater can be mitigated by following
good hygiene practices (washing hands and face before drinking or eating) and wearing appropriate PPE
as outlined herein.
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 28
To mitigate vapour inhalation risks during construction activities, a vapour monitoring program will be
developed by a contamination or industrial hygiene specialist which will be implemented by the construction
contractor at the Coquitlam Industrial Area. The monitoring program will include air quality threshold limits
and the mitigations required if those limits are approached . The monitoring program will include the
parameters of H2S and combustible landfill gas at a minimum.
7.3 Confirmatory Sampling Methodology and Analytical Requirements

Where trenching and excavation methods are used during construction activities at the Coquitlam Industrial
Area, for the high-risk sites it is recommended that confirmatory soil samples be collected from the base
and sidewalls of the trench as a record of residual impacts in those locations to confirm the absence or
presence of potential contamination impacts within the right-of-way. The sampling frequency will be
approximately one soil sample for field screening every 50 m along the length of the right-of-way, per metre
of depth, or as visual and olfactory indicators are present. Based on field screening results or as
visual/olfactory indicators are present, or both, select samples will be submitted to an accredited laboratory
for analysis of select parameters (see Table 17). The parameters to be analyzed are listed as a primary
suite of recommended analyses, and a secondary suite of additional/potential analyses if applicable (Table
17), and can be adjusted as sampling progresses and analytical results are reviewed to determine the CoCs
from the CoPCs.
Prior to construction, daylighting will be completed in the area. Soil samples collected during this process
will be field screened and samples will be analysed for a select primary suite of compounds listed in Table
17 to confirm or refute the presence of PCOCs in the specific location. Further, when trenching/construction
activities are occurring, if specific waste types are encountered and visible (electrical waste, perfluoronated
compounds including foams, and/or coatings, etc.) the additional secondary suite of analyses listed in Table
17 may need to be considered and submitted for further analyses. Tables 17 and Table 18 can be used to
direct the primary and secondary (if applicable) suite of confirmatory analyses that should be performed,
depending upon where the potential contaminated soil or groundwater is identified. The recommended
analyses may be adjusted as sampling progresses and analytical results are reviewed, and analytical
results are reviewed to determine the CoCs from the CoPCs.
TABLE 17
SOIL LABORATORY ANALYSIS
KP (Address) Sampling Requirements (Soil) Recommended Primary and Secondary (if Applicable)
Analyses (Soil)
1168.85 to 1169.15 Characterization Sampling - One soil sample Primary: pH, metals LEPH/HEPH, BTEX, VPH
(Former Lougheed Warehouse and for every 50 m length per metre of depth
Terminal
2381 Rogers Avenue)
1169.35 to 1170.0 Characterization Sampling - One soil sample
Former Leeder Landfill for every 50 m length per metre of depth
(2080 United Boulevard to Primary: pH, metals LEPH/HEPH/PAHs, VOCs, BTEX, VPH,
51 Leeder Street)
Secondary: ions, TOC, PCBs, glycols, phenols (chlorinated
1169.9 to 1170.0 Characterization Sampling - One soil sample and non-chlorinated), PFOS, PFOA, NMOCs
(Great Canadian Casino for every 50 m length per metre of depth
2100 United Boulevard)
1170.0 to 1171.85 Characterization Sampling - One soil sample Primary: pH, metals LEPH/HEPH/PAHs, VOCs, BTEX, VPH,
(Former Terra Nova Landfill for every 50 m length per metre of depth
1200 United Boulevard to Secondary: ions, TOC, PCBs, glycols, phenols (chlorinated
1988 United Boulevard) and non-chlorinated), PFOS, PFOA, NMOCs
1171.85 to 1172.0 Characterization Sampling - One soil sample Primary: Metals, BTEX
(Former Fraser Mills for every 50 m length per metre of depth
8 – 10 King Edward Street)
1172.3 to 1173.2 Characterization Sampling - One soil sample Primary: Metals
(Former Coquitlam Landfill for every 50 m length per metre of depth
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 29
Completing these analyses will support proper management of soil disposal. Additionally, samples should
be submitted to an accredited laboratory for analysis of Class II Landfill characterization or other parameters
appropriate for the disposal method and receiver requirements.
TABLE 18
GROUNDWATER/SURFACE WATER LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Recommended Primary and Secondary (if Expected Groundwater

KP (Address) Applicable) Analyses (Groundwater) Level
1168.85 to 1169.15 No CoCs identified 2.2 masl
(Former Lougheed Warehouse and Terminal
2381 Rogers Avenue)
1169.35 to 1170.0 Primary: pH, metals and dissolved ions,
Former Leeder Landfill sulfate, TOC, TDS, LEPH/HEPH/PAHs, ,
(2080 United Boulevard to 51 Leeder Street) VOCs, BTEX, VPH
3.0 - 4.0 masl
1169.9 to 1170.0 Secondary: PCBs, glycols, phenols
(Great Canadian Casino (chlorinated and non-chlorinated), PFOS,
2100 United Boulevard) PFOA, NMOCs
1170.0 to 1171.85 Primary: pH, metals and dissolved ions, TOC, 3.0 - 4.0 masl
(Former Terra Nova Landfill TDS, LEPH/HEPH/PAHs, VOCs, BTEX, VPH
1200 United Boulevard to 1988 United Secondary: PCBs, glycols, phenols
Boulevard) (chlorinated and non-chlorinated), PFOS,
PFOA, NMOCs
1171.85 to 1172.0 No CoCs identified 3.5 masl
(Former Fraser Mills
8 – 10 King Edward Street)
1172.3 to 1173.2 Primary: pH, metals and dissolved ions, nitrate, 0.7 - 2.4 masl
(Former Coquitlam Landfill LEPH/HEPH/PAHs
The recommended primary suite, and secondary suite of additional/potential (if applicable) groundwater
and surface water analyses are based on historical CoCs. The recommended primary suite of analyses
may be adjusted as sampling progresses and analytical results are reviewed to determine the CoCs from
the CoPCs Sampling will be conducted if contaminated water is encountered during construction and/or
significant rainfall/snowmelt events occur during construction activities in the Coquitlam Industrial Area and
dewatering is necessary. If contaminated groundwater is identified during construction and dewatering is
required, the extracted water disposal options may include one of the following; characterization, treatment,
if contaminated, and release; release without treatment if not contaminated; or disposal at a facility with or
without characterization, as necessary.
7.4 Handling Contaminated Material and Disposal

Loading contaminated soil directly into trucks or roll-off bins at the Coquitlam Industrial Area for off-site disposal
is the preferred material handling procedure. Materials must be disposed of at an approved Trans Mountain
facility. Additional analysis and approval of the impacted soil may be required for final soil disposal.
Groundwater and/or surface water run-off collected and stored in a temporary holding tank at the Coquitlam
Industrial Area or pumped directly in a vacuum truck may be disposed of at an approved Trans Mountain
facility, as necessary. Additional analysis and approvals may be required for disposal.
Should additional soil sampling conducted during construction activities indicate that the soil is unsuitable
for disposal at a Class II landfill facility (leachable CoPC concentrations exceed the applicable guidelines),
the soil must be transported to a hazardous waste facility for disposal.
7.5 Trench Backfilling and Mitigation Measures

If the trenching/excavation method is used during construction activities, it is recommended that the trench
be backfilled with excess clean on-site soil, or imported clean fill if required, suitable for pipeline stability as
identified by Trans Mountain. Excess on-site soil to be used as fill will be verified non-impacted by laboratory
analysis by an accredited laboratory, with reference to BC CSR soil standards, (Schedule 3.1 - Part 1
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 30
through Part 3) (BC ENV 2019) for IL use. A sufficient number of samples should be
submitted (approximately one composite sample for every 250 m3 of material according to BC ENV
Technical Guidance Document 1 “Site Characterization and Confirmation Testing”) to an accredited
laboratory for analysis of BTEX/VPH, LEPH/HEPH/PAHs, VOCs, metals and salinity parameters (BC
MOE 2009).
With the pipeline trench extending through areas of contaminated soil and groundwater, a potential arises
regarding creating a preferential pathway and minimizing the potential for contaminant migration.
Potential mitigation measures to minimize contaminant migration potentially resulting from introducing the
pipeline into the area include creating low permeability barriers or plugs. These low permeability barriers
would be installed across the full cross-section of the pipeline trench to minimize migration of
groundwater through the more permeable bedding material beyond a given area of contamination. The
design criteria would include using low permeability material (on the order 10-8 m/s) to create these
barriers. Materials that can effectively meet this low permeability design criteria include compacted clay,
concrete, controlled density fill, bentonite slurries and unshrinkable fill. As such, a ditch breaker barrier
will be installed at the beginning and end points at each former landfill site within the Coquitlam Area,
where the pipeline bore, or trench is at a depth below the groundwater table and where surrounding
soils are of generally continuous fine-grained material. This will limit potential lateral migration along the
right-of-way wall outside of the landfill areas.
7.6 Design Considerations and Engineering Controls

Trans Mountain design specifications indicate the planned pipeline will be low carbon, high strength, low
alloy Grade 483 steel with fusion-bonded epoxy (FBE) coating applied for corrosion protection. A cathodic
protection system will be used as a secondary corrosion control measure for the pipeline. FBE coatings are
resistant to chemical degradation.
The Graco Chemical Compatibility Guide (Graco 2013) and the Geotech Chemical Compatibility Table
(Geotech 2019) were consulted to identify potential chemical incompatibilities between carbon steel and
the CoCs historically detected in soil and groundwater at the Coquitlam Industrial Area. Table 19 provides
additional details.
TABLE 19
CHEMICAL COMPATIBILITY ASSESSMENT
Chemical Compatibility Assessment 1

pH Not applicable
TOC No data
TDS No data
PCBs No data
VOCs Most VOCs range from Good to Excellent with < 0.05 to < 0.5 mm penetration/year
VPH No data
PFOS/PFOA No data
NMOC No data
Ammonia Excellent
Sulfate No data
Phenols (< 0.5 mm penetration/year)
Glycols No data
Fluoride No data
Nitrate No data
Metals (other than mercury) No data
Mercury Excellent
Benzene Excellent (< 0.5 mm penetration/year)
Toluene No data
Ethylbenzene No data
Xylene Good
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 31
TABLE 19 (cont'd)
Chemical Compatibility Assessment 1

HEPH No data
LEPH No data
PAHs (other than naphthalene) No data
Naphthalene (< 0.5 mm penetration/year)
Note: 1 CoCs compared to Carbon Steel
Although there remains a level of uncertainty with the CoCs that do not have data regarding compatibility,
most of the CoCs received a “good” or “excellent” chemical compatibility rating, when compared with carbon
steel. In addition, penetration rates indicated a relatively low rate of penetration of carbon steel for the
chemicals with data available. Where information is available, the assessment is considered conservative,
since the Graco Chemical Compatibility Guide evaluates the characteristics of the pure chemical form with
the pipeline material, as opposed to the “diluted” chemicals in soil and/or groundwater. However, it should
be noted that the compatibility guide does not account for secondary effects potentially posed by chemical
mixtures in the soil or groundwater, or both.
Based on this review, no compatibility mitigation measures are recommended.
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 32
8.0 HEALTH AND SAFETY PLANNING

As discussed in Section 5.0, CoCs in soil and groundwater have been identified at the Coquitlam Industrial
Area based on background historical information. CoCs at the sites have been identified through
comparison of historical soil and groundwater data to the BC CSR soil and groundwater standards
(Schedules 3.1 and 3.2). Human exposure routes are considered the most relevant in terms of potential
CoPC encounters during earthworks construction activities. These include:
• For soil: direct contact (e.g., ingestion, dermal contact), vapour inhalation, particulate inhalation and
off-site migration.
• For groundwater: direct contact (e.g., ingestion, dermal contact) and vapour inhalation. Groundwater
exposures are considered unlikely, or short in duration, as excavations are typically dewatered to
mitigate stability issues.
The human exposure pathways for the CoCs at the Coquitlam Industrial Area include incidental ingestion
of soil or groundwater, vapour inhalation or absorption through skin or inhalation. The potential for incidental
ingestion should not present a concern if good hygiene practices are followed (e.g., wash hands and face
before drinking or eating), and if dust in the area of excavation is managed. Exposures to soil CoCs are
also possible through skin absorption and inhalation. These routes of exposure are minimized through use
of personal engineering controls, administrative controls and the proper use of PPE. Specific PPE
requirements will need to be developed by the construction Contractor.
In addition to the CoCs, gaseous hazards relating to decomposition of landfill material may be present.
These hazards, including methane and H2S, will require monitoring and mitigation plans to be completed
and implemented by the construction Contractor.
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 33
9.0 RESPONSIBILITIES, CONSULTATION AND REPORTING

9.1 Roles and Responsibilities
Contamination management roles and responsibilities for the Project are described in the CIAP, prepared
to meet the CER Condition 46 requirements. The roles and responsibilities construction activities at the
Coquitlam Industrial Area will be consistent with CIAP for the Project.
9.2 Consultation
Consultation and engagement activities may include representatives from the sites included in the
Coquitlam Industrial Area. TMEP will manage any landowner commitments that are made as a result of
these activities, such as when decommissioning groundwater monitoring wells is required.
9.3 Reporting Requirements

The Resource Specialist (Environmental Consultant) will provide a comprehensive summary and report of
contamination management activities undertaken. The CIAP (Filing ID A90938, Trans Mountain 2017)
provides the following information which as a minimum, will be recorded by the Resource Specialist during
construction activities:
• date of investigative works completed
• location of the contaminated media encountered
• quantity of contaminated soil transported off the property
• quantity of water, if any, treated or transported off the property
• identify the receiving location(s) for the soil and/or groundwater
• quantity of soils replaced in the excavation (if applicable) including the amount of sourced
material
• analytical results of the characterization sampling completed; and
• identify source and obtain analytical results for the backfill material
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 34
10.0 LIMITATIONS
This Site-Specific Management Plan has been developed in accordance with applicable provincial
standards, guidance documents and regulatory policies. This Site-Specific Management Plan has been
completed using general engineering and scientific judgment, principles and practices and the degree and
quality of this information is currently limited to soils and/or groundwater information provided in historical
reports and documentation.
This Site-Specific Management Plan is based on unverified historical information from several sources
during its development, and the completeness and accuracy of the historical information is not guaranteed.
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 35
11.0 REFERENCES
AECOM. 2015. Coquitlam Landfill 2015 Closure Plan.
AECOM. 2017. Site 2194 Coquitlam Landfill—2016 Approval in Principle (AIP) Performance Verification
Report. Prepared for Metro Vancouver. April.
AECOM. 2018. Coquitlam Landfill Groundwater Monitoring Report. Prepared for Metro Vancouver.
April 6.
Armstrong, J E. 1984. Environmental and Engineering Applications of the Surficial Geology of the Fraser
Lowland, British Columbia (No. 23). Geological Survey of Canada.
Armstrong, J E; Hiscock, S R. 1980. Surficial Geology, New Westminster, West of Sixth Meridian, British
Columbia; Geological Survey of Canada, "A" Series Map 1484A, 1 sheet,
https://doi.org/10.4095/108874
ARO Environmental (ARO). 2003. Confirmation of Remediation Report 2381 Rogers Avenue, Coquitlam,
BC. Prepared for Mr. Kim Bekesinski Stewart’s Cartage. May.
Atwater, J.W. 1980. Fraser River Estuary Study Water Quality: Impacts of Landfills. Environmental
Protection Service Environment Canada. April.
BGC Engineering Inc. (BGC). 2016. Impacts of Pipeline Construction Across Historic Coquitlam Landfills.
April 12.
British Columbia Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy (BC ENV). 2019. Contaminated
Sites Regulation. BC Reg. 375/96, including amendment specified in Environmental Management
Act amendment, dated January 24, 2019.
http://www.bclaws.ca/Recon/document/ID/freeside/375_96_00
British Columbia Ministry of Environment (BC MOE). 2004. Conditional Certificate of Compliance
British Columbia Ministry of Environment (BC MOE). 2009. Technical Guidance 1 – Site Characterization
and Confirmation Testing. Dated January 2009.
https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/environment/air-land-water/site-remediation/docs/technical-
guidance/tg01.pdf
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS). 2018.

https://www.ccohs.ca/teach_tools/phys_hazards/ppe.html. Accessed April 4, 2019.
Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). 2019. CCME Summary Table.
http://st-ts.ccme.ca/en/index.html?chems=all. Accessed April 16, 2019.
CH2M HILL Energy Canada, Ltd. (CH2M).2012. Nelson Creek Integrated Watershed Management Plan.
Prepared for City of Coquitlam. June.
CH2M HILL Energy Canada, Ltd. (CH2M). 2017. Summary of Drilling Investigation – 8-10 King Edward
Street, Coquitlam. February.
Eivemark, M.M. 2002. Geotechnical Construction Issues on Leeder Landfill (Cape Horn Industrial Park,
Coquitlam, BC). In Vancouver Geotechnical Society Symposium Proceedings, Vancouver, BC.
pp. 53-59.
GeoBC, Government of British Columbia. 2016. British Columbia Topographic Maps: Map 092G026
(1:20,000). https://pub.data.gov.bc.ca/datasets/177864/pdf/092G/092G026.pdf
Geotech Environmental (Geotech). 2019. Geotech Chemical Compatibility Table.

http://www.geotechenv.com/Reference_Pages/chemical_compatibility_table.pdf
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 36
Golder Associates Ltd. (Golder). 1996. Assessment of Potential Effect of North Coquitlam Landfill
Drainage on the Water Quality of Nelson Creek and Brunette River.
Golder Associates Ltd. (Golder). 2002. Environmental Site Assessment, Risk Assessment and
Remediation Plan, Coquitlam Landfill, Coquitlam, B.C. May 13.
Golder Associates Ltd. (Golder). 2003a. #8-10 King Edward Street, Coquitlam, BC., Site ID# 7829 COC
Application – Response to Request for Information.
Golder Associates Ltd. (Golder). 2003b. Confirmation of Remediation #8-10 King Edward Street,
Coquitlam, BC
Government of British Columbia (Government of BC). 2019a. iMapBC. Accessed March 28, 2019.
https://maps.gov.bc.ca/ess/hm/imap4m/
Government of British Columbia (Government of BC). 2019b. Ministry of Energy, Mines, and Petroleum
Resources. BC Geology Index Map. Accessed March 29, 2019.
http://webmap.em.gov.bc.ca/mapplace/minpot/geolindx.asp
Graco Chemical Compatibility Guide (Graco). 2013.

(http://www.graco.com/content/dam/graco/ipd/literature/misc/chemical-compatibility-
guide/Graco_ChemCompGuideEN-B.pdf). July. Accessed April 4, 2019.
Groulx, B. J., Mosher, D. C., Luternauer, J. L., & Bilderback, D. E. (Eds.). 2004. Fraser River Delta, British
Columbia: Issues of an Urban Estuary (Vol. 567). Geological Survey of Canada.
Health Canada. 2017. Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality. February.
Morrow. 2004. Notification of Independent Remediation – 2100 United Boulevard, Coquitlam, BC
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
(NIOSH). 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/index.htm. Accessed April 4, 2019.
NEXT Environmental. 2000. Stage 1 Preliminary Site Investigation 8-10 King Edward, Coquitlam, BC
Thurber Consultants Ltd. (Thurber). 1989a. Fraser Mill Development Contaminant Investigation Former
Terra Nova Landfill. Prepared for Intrawest Properties Limited. October 3.
Thurber Consultants Ltd. (Thurber). 1989b. Terra Nova landfill Organic Analysis of Nine Site Wells.
Prepared for Intrawest Properties Limited. October 18.
Thurber Consultants Ltd. (Thurber). 1989c. Terra Nova Landfill Preliminary Results Soil Gas Geochemical
Investigation. Prepared for Intrawest Properties Limited. November 10.
Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC (Trans Mountain). 2018. Contamination Identification and Assessment Plan
for the Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Trans Mountain Expansion Project NEB Condition 46.
March.
Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC (Trans Mountain). 2019. Trans Mountain Environmental Field Guide –
Contamination Roles and Responsibilities.
01-13283-S7-M002-EV-PLN-0005
Page 37

C08975-1 Condition 46 Site Specific MGT Plan CIAP Coquitlam Spd7 October 19, 2020 - A7J5X2

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

C08975-1 Condition 46 Site Specific MGT Plan CIAP Coquitlam Spd7 October 19, 2020 - A7J5X2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Trans Mountain Expansion Project

Email: info@transmountain.com | Phone: 1.866.514.6700 | Website: www.transmountain.com | @TransMtn

VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION

October 19, 2020

Suite 2700, 300 5th Avenue SW, Calgary, AB T2P 5J2

Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

PROPERTIES WITHIN IDENTIFIED COQUITLAM INDUSTRIAL AREA

CIAP Site Risk

1.1.2 Former Leeder Landfill, 2080 United Boulevard to 51 Leeder Street,

BUR NABY e River rr y S

MAP NUMBER PAGE

Projection: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 10N.

1.2 Objectives and Scope of Work

• Reviewing historical reports and information to determine if adequate information on Contaminants of

• Recommending risk mitigation measures to be implemented during pre-construction, construction and

2.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

2.1 Soil Standards

- Intake of contaminated soil

- Toxicity to soil invertebrates and plants

- Groundwater used for DW

- Groundwater flow to surface water used by AWF

2.2 Groundwater Standards

3.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION

AVAILABLE HISTORICAL REPORTS AND DOCUMENTATION

3.2 Former Leeder Landfill, 2080 United Boulevard to 51 Leeder Street,

4.0 REGIONAL INFORMATION AND SITE SETTING

4.2 Regional Geology and Hydrogeology

4.3 Site Geology, Stratigraphy and Hydrogeology

• local occurrences of landfill and fill

• Salish Sediments to the north: lowland peat (up to 2-m-thick)

• shallow aquifer: shallow fill and peat/organics units (approximately 4-m-thick)

• intermediate aquitard: silt unit

• deep aquifer: “Fraser River Sands” unit

5.0 CONTAMINANTS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN

2381 ROGERS AVENUE COQUITLAM SOIL PARAMETERS

BC CSR IL BC CSR CL BC CSR CL CCME CCME CEQG CL

2381 ROGERS AVENUE COQUITLAM GROUNDWATER PARAMETERS

2080 UNITED BOULEVARD TO 51 LEEDER STREET, COQUITLAM SOIL PARAMETERS

CSR CL CCME CCME CEQG CL

2080 UNITED BOULEVARD TO 51 LEEDER STREET, COQUITLAM GROUNDWATER PARAMETERS

BC CSR Aquatic CCME CEQG

5.3 Great Canadian Casinos, 2100 United Boulevard, Coquitlam, Contaminants of

1200 TO 1988 UNITED BOULEVARD COQUITLAM SOIL PARAMETERS

CCME CEQG IL CCME CEQG CL

1200 TO 1988 UNITED BOULEVARD COQUITLAM GROUNDWATER PARAMETERS

Maximum BC CSR Aquatic CCME CEQG

5.5 Former Fraser Mills 8 to 10 King Edward Street, Coquitlam Contaminants of

8 TO 10 KING EDWARD STREET COQUITLAM SOIL PARAMETERS

CCME CEQG IL CCME CEQG CL

8 TO 10 KING EDWARD STREET COQUITLAM GROUNDWATER PARAMETERS

Maximum CCME CEQG

5.6 1001 United Boulevard, Coquitlam (Former Coquitlam Landfill) Contaminants

1001 UNITED BOULEVARD COQUITLAM SOIL PARAMETERS

1001 UNITED BOULEVARD COQUITLAM GROUNDWATER PARAMETERS

5.7 Summary of Contaminants of Potential Concern and Contaminants of

SOIL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN FOR COQUITLAM INDUSTRIAL AREA

Parameter Sites Parameter is a Concern Status of Parameter

GROUNDWATER CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN AND CONTAMINANTS OF POTENTIAL

Parameter Sites Parameter is a Concern Status of Parameter

CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN POTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECTS

6.0 CONSTRUCTION FOOTPRINT WITHIN COQUITLAM INDUSTRIAL AREA