IN THE LD.

COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, 2ND COURT DURGAPUR

C.R. CASE NO. 28/09

Sukla Kanjilal -vs- Rabindranath Kanjilal & others

Accused petitioner: 1) Rabindra Nath Kanjilal

2) Sukla Kanjilal
3) Manorama Kanjilal

Application for Bail under section 437 of the Criminal Procedure Code

The humble petition of the petitioners

in this case
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHEWETH: -
1) That your petitioners are bonafide citizens of the state and they are innocent
persons.
2) That your petitioner No. 1 is a retired teacher.
3) That it is learnt that police came to the house of the petitioners in their
absence and reported to the para people that one C.R. Case No. 28/09 was
started against the petitioners by the complainant.
4) That the complainant made false & baseless statements against the
petitioners to humiliate them.
5) That one case for maintenance was filed long ago and that case is pending in
your Honour’s Court.
6) That your petitioners after coming to know of this case rushed to your
Honour’s Court to appear in person with a prayer for bail.
7) That your petitioners are ready to take back the complainant with child if
she wants to live at the in-laws house with her child.
8) That your petitioners are local person having home and family and thus
there is no chance of their abscondence or of tampering with evidence.
9) That the petition is a bonafide one.
Under the aforesaid facts and
circumstances it is most humbly
prayed that your Honour would be
kind enough to grant bail of nominal
amount to your petitioners in the
interest of justice.
And your petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.