CHAPTER 4

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

TABLE 4.1 GENDER

Gender

Frequency Percent

Male 120 100.0

CHART 4.1 GENDER

INTERPRETATION

From the above table 4.1, it is inferred that respondent (100%) are the male
 Table 4.2 Age of Respondent

Age Frequency Percent

21-30 35 29.2
31-40 61 50.8
41-50 17 14.2
above- 7 5.8
40
Total 120 100.0

Chart 4.2 Age of the Respondent

INTERPRETATION
From the above table 4.2 it is inferred that respondent (50.83%) are the age (5.83%) the
respondent are the age
 Table 4.3 Marital status

Marital Frequenc
Status y Percent

Married 79 65.8

unmarrie 41 34.2
d

Total 120 100.0

Chart 4.3 Martial status of the respondent

INTERPRETATION

From the above table 4.3 it is inferred that (65.83%) respondent are Married (34.17%) of the
respondent are Unmarried
 Table 4.4 Income of Respondent

Income Frequency Percent

10000- 47 39.2
20000

21000- 43 35.8
30000

31000- 21 17.5
40000

above 9 7.5
40000

Total 120 100.0

Chart 4.4 Income of the Respondent

INTERPRETATION

From the above table 4.4 it is inferred that (39.17%) respondent are Income (7.50%) of the
respondent are Income
 Table 4.5 Year of experience of the Respondent

Year of

Experience Frequency Percent

1-5 years 55 45.8

5-10 years 34 28.3

10-15 years 22 18.3

above 15 9 7.5
year

Total 120 100.0

Chart 4.5 Year of experience of the Respondent

INTERPRETATION
From the above table 4.5 it is inferred that (45.83%) respondent are year of experience (7.50%)
of the respondent are year of experience
 Table 4.6 Education of the respondent

Education Frequency Percent

10th to 12th 14 11.7

diploma / ITI 51 42.5

under graduate 41 34.2

post graduate 14 11.7

Total 120 100.0

Chart 4.6 Education of the respondent

INTERPRETATIO
For the above table 4.6 it is inferred that (42.50%) respondent are education (11.67%) of the
respondent are education
 TABLE 4.7 (T-TEST)
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HOW DO YOU SATISFY ABOUT THE WASHING
ALLOWANCE PROVIDED BY THE COMPANY AND HOW DO YOU RATE THE
CULTURE WORKING ENVIRONMENT OF THE ORGANIZATION

One-Sample Statistics N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

washing allowances 119 4.48 .757 .069

culture working environment 120 3.75 1.154 .105

of the organizations

Test Value = 0

95% Confidence Interval of

One-Sample the Difference
Sig. (2- Mean
Test t Df tailed) Difference Lower Upper

washing allowances 64 118 .000 4.479 4.34 4.62

.5
07

culture working 35 119 .000 3.750 3.54 3.96

environment of the .5
organizations 94

INTERPRETATION

From the above 4.7 shows that there is no significant different between how do you satisfy about
the washing allowance provided by the company how do rate the culture working environment of
the organization significant P value is less than .000 One Sample Test .000 hence the alternative
hypothesis is rejected and the null hypothesis is accepted.
TABLE 4.8(T-TEST)

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH THE FOOD

/SNACKS/TEA/COFFEE PROVIDED TO YOU AT DIFFERENT INTREVALS AND
ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH PRESENT METHOD OF CALCULATION OF
GRATUITY

One-Sample Std.

Statistics N Mean Deviation Std. Error Mean

/snacks/tea/coffee/ 120 4.33 .822 .075

calculation of gratuity 120 3.78 1.086 .099

Test Value = 0

95% Confidence Interval

of the Difference
One-Sample Sig. (2- Mean
Test t Df tailed) Difference Lower Upper

/snacks/tea/coff 57.667 119 .000 4.325 4.18 4.47

ee/

calculation of 38.160 119 .000 3.783 3.59 3.98

gratuity

INTERPRETATION

From the above 4.8 shows that there is no significant different between are you satisfied with the
food/snacks/tea/coffee provided to you at different intervals are you satisfied with present
method of calculation of gratuity significant p value is less than .000 one sample Test value .000
hence the alternative hypothesis is rejected and null hypothesis is accepted.
 TABLE 4.9 ( T-TEST)

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HOW DO YOU RATE THE MEDICAL BENEFITS

PROVIDED BY THE ORGANISATION FOR EMPLOYEES AND HOW DO YOU RATE
THE WORKING HOURS OF THE ORGANISATION

One-Sample
Statistics N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

medical benefit 120 3.97 1.076 .098

working hours 120 4.01 .921 .084

Test Value = 0

95% Confidence Interval

Mean of the Difference
Sig. (2- Differen
One-Sample Test t Df tailed) ce Lower Upper

promotion policy 38.622 119 .000 3.883 3.68 4.08

employee welfare 37.848 118 .000 3.723 3.53 3.92

activities

INTERPRETATION

From the above 4.9 shows that there is no significant different between how do you rate

the medical benefits provided by the organization for employees how do you rate the working
hours of the organization significant p value is less than .000 one sample Testvalue .000 hence
the alternative hypothesis is rejected and the null hypothesis is accepted.
 TABLE 4.10( T-TEST)

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH THE PROMOTION

POLICY IN YOUR ORGANISATION AND RATE THE OVERALL SATISFICATION
WITH EMPLOYEE WELFARE ACTIVITIES OF THE ORGANISATION

One-Sample Statistics N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

promotion policy 120 3.88 1.101 .101

employee welfare 119 3.72 1.073 .098

activities

Test Value = 0

95% Confidence Interval of

Sig. (2- the Difference
Mean
One-Sample Test t Df tailed) Difference Lower Upper

promotion policy 38.622 119 .000 3.883 3.68 4.08

employee welfare 37.848 118 .000 3.723 3.53 3.92

activities

INTERPRETATION

From the above 4.10 shows that there is no significant different between are you satisfied with
the promotion policy in your organization rate the overall satisfactions with employee welfare
activities of the organization significant p value is less than .000 one sample Test value .000
hence the alternative hypothesis is rejected and the null hypothesis is accepted.
 TABLE 4.11 (ANOVA)

RELATONSHIP BETWEEN ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH TRANSPORT FACILITIES

PROVIDED BY YOUR COMPANY

H0: There is no significant difference between are you satisfied with transport facilities provided
by your company

H1: There is significant difference between are you satisfied with transport facilities provided by
your company

ANOVA

Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.

Between 5.599 4 1.400 1.407 .236

Groups

Within Groups 114.393 115 .995

Total 119.992 119

INTERPERTATION

From the above 4.11, shows that there is significant difference between the are you satisfied
with transport facilities provided by your company p value is less than 0.05 one –sample Test
value .236 hence the alternative hypothesis is accepted and the null hypothesis is rejected
 TABLE 4.12 (ANOVA)

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH THE WORKING

FACILITIES PROVIDED THE ORGANIZATIONS

H0: There is no significant difference between are you satisfied with the working facilities
provided

H1: There is significant difference between are you satisfied with the working facilities provided

ANOVA

working facilities

Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 2.313 4 .578 .503 .734

Within Groups 132.187 115 1.149

Total 134.500 119

INTERPERTATION

From the above 4.12, shows that there is significant difference between the are you satisfied with
the working facilities provided p value is less than 0.05 one –sample Test value .734 hence the
alternative hypothesis is accepted and the null hypothesis is rejected
 TABLE 4.13 (ANOVA)

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUGGEST YOUR OPINION OF SAFETY

EQUIPMENTPROVIDED IN THE ORGANISATION

H0: There is no significant difference between safety equipments provided in the organization

H1: There is significant difference between safety equipments provided in the organization

ANOVA

safety equipments

Sum of
Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.

Between 2.857 4 .714 .835 .505

Groups

Within Groups 98.343 115 .855

Total 101.200 119

INTERPERTATION

From the above 4.13, shows that there is significant difference between the suggest your opinion
of safety equipments provided in the organization p value is less than 0.05 one –sample Test
value .505 hence the alternative hypothesis is accepted and the

null hypothesis is rejected

 TABLE 4.14 (ANOVA)

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DO THE WELFARE MEASURES HELP IN SOLVING

THE PROBLEMS FACED BY EMPLOYEES

H0: There is no significant difference between welfare measures help in the solving problems
faced by employees

H1: There is significant difference between welfare measures help in the solving problems faced
by employees

ANOVA

welfare measures help in solving the problems

Sum of Mean
Squares Df Square F Sig.

Between 5.303 4 1.326 1.233 .301

Groups

Within Groups 123.689 115 1.076

Total 128.992 119

INTERPERTATION

From the above 4.14, shows that there is significant difference between Do the welfare measures
help in solving the problems faced by employees p value is less than 0.05 one –sample Test
value . 301 hence the alternative hypothesis is accepted and the null hypothesis is rejected
 TABLE 4.15 (ANOVA)

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH HYGIENIC CONDITIONS

AROUND WORKING PLACE AND ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH THE WORKING
FACILITIES PROVIDED

H0: There is no significant difference between are you satisfied with hygienic conditions around
working place

H1: There is significant difference between are you satisfied with hygienic conditions around
working place

Correlations

hygienic working
conditions facilities

hygenic Pearson Correlation 1 -.038

conditions
Sig. (1-tailed) .339

N 120 120

working Pearson Correlation -.038 1

facilities
Sig. (1-tailed) .339

N 120 120

INTERPERTATION

From the above 4.15, shows that there is significant difference between are you satisfied with
hygienic conditions around working place are you satisfied with the working facilities provided
employees p value is less than 0.05 one –sample Test value . 339 hence the alternative
hypothesis is accepted and the null hypothesis is rejected.
 TABLE 4.16 (CORRELATION)

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH THE OHC (FIRST AID )
PROVIDED BY THE COMPANY AND ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH NON-
STATUTORY WELFARE PROVISIONS

H0: There is no significant difference between non statutory welfare measures provisions

H1: There is significant difference between non statutory welfare measures provisions

Correlations

OHC first non statutory welfare

aid provisions

OHC first aid Pearson 1 -.217**

Correlation

Sig. (1-tailed) .009

N 120 120

non statutory welfare Pearson -.217** 1

provisions Correlation

Sig. (1-tailed) .009

1

N 10 120

INTERPRETATION

From the above 4.16, shows that there is significant difference between are you satisfied
with the OHC (first aid) provided by the company are you satisfied with non- statutory
welfare provisions p value is less than 0.05 hence the alternative hypothesis is accepted
and the null hypothesis is rejected
 TABLE 4.17 ( CORRELATION)

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RATE THE OVERTIME ALLOWANCES OFFERED BY

THE ORGANISATION AND HOW DO YOU RATE THE WORKING HOURS OF THE
ORGANISATION

H0: There is no significant difference between overtime allowances offered by the organization

H1: There is significant difference between overtime allowances offered by the organization

Correlations

overtime
allowances
offered working hours

overtime allowances Pearson Correlation 1 .057

offered
Sig. (1-tailed) .270

N 120 120

working hours Pearson Correlation .057 1

Sig. (1-tailed) .270

N 120 120

INTERPERTATION

From the above 4.17, shows that there is significant difference between rate the overall
allowances offered by the organization how do you rate the working hours of the organization p
value is less than 0.05 hence the alternative hypothesis is accepted and the null hypothesis is
rejected.
 TABLE 4.18 (CORRELATON)

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH THE PRESENT METHOD

OF CALCULATION OF GRATUITY AND SUGGEST YOUR OPINION OF SAFETY
EUIPMENTS PROVIDED IN THE ORGANISATION

H0: There is no significant difference between safety equipments provided in the organization

H1: There is significant difference between safety equipments provided in the organization

Correlations

calculation of
safety
gratuity equiments

calculation of Pearson Correlation 1 .018

gratuity
Sig. (1-tailed) .421

N 120 120

safety equipments Pearson Correlation .018 1

Sig. (1-tailed) .421

N 120 120

INTERPERTATION

From the above 4.18, shows that there is significant difference between are you satisfied with
the present method of calculation of gratuity suggest your opinion of safety equipments provided
in the organizations p value is less than 0.05 hence the alternative hypothesis is accepted and
the null hypothesis is rejected
 TABLE 4.19 ( REGRESSION)

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HOW DO YOU RATE THE MEDICAL BENEFITS

PROVIDED BY THE ORGANISATION FOR EMPLOYEES AND HOW DO YOU FEEL
ABOUT THE POLICY & ADMINISTRATION OF YOUR COMPANY IN WELFARE
ACTIVITIES

H0: There is no significant difference policy and administration of your company in welfare
activities

H1: There is significant difference between policy and administration of your company in
welfare activities

Model Summary

Adjusted R Std. Error of

Model R R Square Square the Estimate

1 .208a .043 .035 1.057

INTERPERTATION

From the above 4.19, shows that there is significant difference between how do you rate the
medical benefits provided by the organization for employees how do you feel about the policy &
administration of your company in welfare activities p value is less than 0.05 hence the
alternative hypothesis is accepted and the null hypothesis is rejected
 TABLE 4.20( REGRESSION)

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IS THE WORK PLACE REGULARLY CLEANED AND

HOW DO YOU RATE THE CULTURE WORKING ENVIRONMRNT OF THE
ORGANISATION

H0: There is no significant difference between culture working environment of the organization

H1: There is significant difference between culture working environment of the organization

Model Summary

Adjusted R Std. Error of

Model R R Square Square the Estimate

1 .249a .062 .054 .989

INTERPERTATION

From the above 4.20, shows that there is significant difference between is the work place
regularly cleaned how do you rate the culture working environment of the organization p value is
less than 0.05 hence the alternative hypothesis is accepted and the null hypothesis is rejected
 TABLE 4.21( REGRESSION)

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HOW DO YOU RATE THE WORKING HOURS OF THE

ORGANISATION AND HOW DO YOU RATE THE CULTURE WORKING
ENVIRONMENT OF THE ORGANISATION

H0: There is no significant difference between rate the working hours of the organization

H1: There is significant difference between rate the working hours of the organization

Model Summary

Std. Error
Mod R Adjusted R of the
el R Square Square Estimate

1 .026a .001 -.008 .925

INTERPERTATION

From the above 4.21, shows that there is significant difference between how do you rate the
working hours of the organization how do you rate the culture working environment of the
organization p value is less than 0.05 hence the alternative hypothesis is accepted and the null
hypothesis is rejected
 TABLE 4.22 (REGRESSION)

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARE THE WORKERS SATISFIED WITH SAFETY

SHOES AND HELMET PROVIDED BY THE COMPANY AND HOW DO YOU RATE
THE CULTURE WORKING ENVIRONMENT OF THE ORGANIZATION

H0: There is no significant differences between safety shoes and helmet provided by the
company

H1: There is significant differences between safety shoes and helmet provided by the company

Model Summary

Adjusted R Std. Error of

Model R R Square Square the Estimate

1 .117a .014 .005 .619

INTERPERTATION

From the above 4.22, shows that there is significant difference between are the workers satisfied
with safety shoes and helmet provided by the company how do you rate the culture working
environment of the organization p value is less than 0.05 hence the alternative hypothesis is
accepted and the null hypothesis is rejected