Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mousavi2019 Viana Coprecipitação
Mousavi2019 Viana Coprecipitação
LaNiO3 and LaNi0.5Co0.5O3 as Ni-based perovskite-type oxides were synthesized via the co-precipitation
method and the activity of the catalysts was evaluated in the methane dry reforming reaction with CO2.
The structure of the prepared perovskites was changed by using magnetized water and was characterized by
means of XRD, BET, SEM, TEM, TPR, and TPH techniques. The result demonstrated that the catalytic activity
Received 15th April 2019, and the stability of LaNi0.5Co0.5O3 were less than those of LaNiO3 while the coke resistance was higher for
Accepted 12th June 2019 the LaNi0.5Co0.5O3 catalyst. On the other hand, it was proved that the presence of free Ni phase in the non-
DOI: 10.1039/c9nj01805k treated samples provided the higher initial activity in comparison to the magnetized ones. The trend for the
amount of the deposited carbon over the surface of the spent catalysts was as follows: LaNiO3 (none) 4
rsc.li/njc LaNiO3 (treat) 4 LaNiCoO3 (none) 4 LaNiCoO3 (treat).
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2019 New J. Chem., 2019, 43, 10763--10773 | 10763
View Article Online
Paper NJC
carbon-resistance of the Ni–Co phyllosilicate catalysts was The samples for TEM were dispersed in ethanol assisted by
partly attributed to the affinity of Co towards the oxygen the ultrasonic technique. The surface morphologies of the
species.29 In addition, the effect of other supports on the calcined perovskites were investigated by a scanning electron
Ni–Co bimetallic systems in DRM is evaluated in a previous microscope (SEM, LEO 1450VP, Germany) with a field emission
report.8 filament.
The previous studies show that the structure of the LaNiO3 Hydrogen temperature programmed reduction (H2-TPR)
perovskites can be significantly affected by the preparation experiments were carried out by using a Micromeritics TPD-
method.30 Moreover, some parameters can change the perovs- TPR model 2900 instrument. The hydrogen amount during the
kite structure, such as the metal loading (the density of the Ni reduction was measured using a thermal conductivity detector
metal on the surface), the applied solvents or precursors for the (TCD). Typically, 50 mg of sample was loaded in a quartz
Published on 13 June 2019. Downloaded by KEAN UNIVERSITY on 7/18/2019 2:03:05 PM.
impregnation, etc. On the other hand, the solvent properties reactor, the reduction gas of 5.1% H2/N2 was introduced, and
including its surface tension and viscosity can be affected by TCD results monitored the hydrogen consumption.
the magnetic field.31–36 The amount of coke deposition on the active sites of
In the present work, we study the preparation of the LaNiO3 the spent catalysts was determined through the temperature
and La Ni0.5Co0.5O3 perovskite structures through the precipi- programmed hydrogenation (TPH) assignment.6,7 The spent
tation method by applying a magnetized and non-magnetized catalyst is treated in the hydrogen stream and the coke deposited
solvent. Besides, the effect of Ni2+ substitution by Co2+ in the B is converted into methane. The TCD detector analyzes the amount
positions of the perovskite structure has been investigated on of methane produced from the TPH process and the amount of
the catalyst activity, product selectivity, and coke deposition. deposited carbon is calculated.
Phase analyses of the calcined perovskites were determined by The specific surface area, pore volume and mean pore diameter
X-ray diffraction (XRD) in a Philips PW-1840 X-ray diffracto- of the prepared catalysts are given in Table 1. As expected for
meter using a Cu Ka radiation source (l = 1.541 Å) to identify the perovskite structures, these results indicated that the sur-
the crystalline structure. face area of the catalysts was significantly low. As shown in
The specific surface areas, total pore volume and average Table 1, by substituting nickel by cobalt in the LaNi0.5Co0.5O3
pore diameter of the calcined perovskites were determined catalyst, the surface area was decreased. In addition, the
by N2 physisorption at 77 K using a Micrometrics ASAP 2010 perovskite samples prepared with magnetized water have a
automated system. Before each measurement, 50 mg of the lower surface area. As shown in Table 1, the total pore volume
sample was degassed under vacuum at 573 K for 2 h. The and the average pore diameter are reduced in samples prepared
specific surface areas of the materials were calculated by using magnetized treatment water.
the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) model and the pore size
distribution from the desorption branch of the isotherms using 3.2. X-ray diffraction studies
the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method. The XRD patterns of the fresh catalysts after calcination and
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations reduced catalysts are shown in Fig. 1. As shown in Fig. 1 for
were conducted using an LEO 912AB electron microscope. the fresh catalysts, peaks due to the perovskite phases are
10764 | New J. Chem., 2019, 43, 10763--10773 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2019
View Article Online
NJC Paper
dominant in the XRD patterns of the catalysts. Fig. 1(a and b) segregation of small nickel oxide to the surface of the LaNiO3
represents the XRD patterns of the LaNiO3 sample prepared by perovskite.
non-treatment and magnetized water, respectively. As shown in The XRD results show that the presence of the NiO and La2O3
these patterns, the diffraction peaks at 23.21, 32.81, 47.31, and phases in the fresh sample prepared by the magnetized water is
58.41 are characteristic of the rhombohedral (R3% m) structure of less than in the non-treatment sample. Thus, co-precipitation of
the LaNiO3 perovskite (JCPDS 33-0711) as the main phase of our the samples in magnetized water prepared more pure LaNiO3
prepared samples by non-treatment and magnetized water.20 perovskite, due to the lower surface tension and higher viscosity of
The additional peaks at 26.71 and 31.21 are related to cubic the magnetized water.35 Our previous results show that the
La2O3 (JCPDS-220369) and at 43.21 and 37.31 are related to the magnetized water reduces the growth rate of the particles while
NiO cubic phase (JCPDS-780643), which confirms that the NiO increases the rate of nucleation in the precipitation process.34
and La2O3 phases exist in addition to the main LaNiO3 phase.20 Fig. 1(c and d) represents the XRD patterns of the LaNi0.5Co0.5O3
The presence of the NiO and La2O3 phases was related to the samples prepared by non-treatment and magnetized water,
Fig. 1 XRD patterns of the fresh and reduced catalysts. (a) LaNiO3 non-treatment, (b) LaNiO3 treatment, (c) LaNiCoO3 non-treatment, (d) LaNiCoO3
treatment.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2019 New J. Chem., 2019, 43, 10763--10773 | 10765
View Article Online
Paper NJC
respectively. As shown in Fig. 1(c), for the LaNi0.5Co0.5O3 fresh Ni0 (2y = 45.1, 53.1, and 77.11) and metallic Co0 (2y = 42.1, and 47.91)
sample prepared by non-treatment water, the diffraction peak appeared. These results show that LaNiO3 and LaNi0.5Co0.5O3
at 331 can be observed to be dual, compared with what it is for perovskites collapsed after the reduction, forming metallic Ni0
LaNiO3, which is related to the formation of the separate phase and Co0 nanoparticles dispersed on the La2O3 support.39–41 The
of LaNi0.5Co0.5O3 and LaCoO3.37 In addition, the position of the crystallite size of the metallic Co and Ni was also determined by
reference peak for LaNiO3 (2y = 32.81) shifts with the addition of applying Scherrer’s equation using the peak located at 45.11 for
Co content (Fig. 1) suggesting the formation of LaNi0.5Co0.5O3 solid Ni and 47.91 for cobalt in the reduced samples and presented in
solution.26 These separated peaks decreased in the XRD pattern Table 1.3,42,43 These results show that the metallic particle size is
of the LaNi0.5Co0.5O3 perovskite fresh sample prepared by reduced in the treatment catalysts.
magnetized water in Fig. 1(d), which indicates a higher purity
Published on 13 June 2019. Downloaded by KEAN UNIVERSITY on 7/18/2019 2:03:05 PM.
of the LaNi0.5Co0.5O3 perovskite phase in this sample. However, 3.3. SEM and TEM results
the partial substitution of the Ni3+ (r = 60 pm) by Co3+ (r = 61 pm), The surface morphologies and homogeneity of the prepared
in the LaNi0.5Co0.5O3 system, increases the B–O distance in the catalysts were analyzed by the SEM images in Fig. 2. As shown
perovskite-type structure and produced an increase in the in Fig. 2, all the calcined catalyst particles are in the form of
rhombohedral cell parameter from 5.457 Å for LaNiO3 to pseudo-spherical particles with aggregates of smaller nano-
5.462 Å in the LaNi0.5Co0.5O3 perovskite prepared by non- particles. In addition, some voids were formed during the
treatment and 5.466 Å in the LaNi0.5Co0.5O3 perovskite calcination due to the decomposition of nitrate in starting salts
prepared by magnetized water.17,26,38 Higher increase in the of the catalysts. By substitution of nickel by cobalt, the macro-
rhombohedral cell parameter for the magnetized prepared sample porosity increased and the morphology of the prepared per-
is related to the greater presence of Co in the LaNi0.5Co0.5O3 ovskites is changed due to the formation of solids with more
perovskite structure. Thus, co-precipitation of the samples in the defects. However, as shown in Fig. 2b, the samples prepared by
magnetized water prepared purer LaNi0.5Co0.5O3 perovskite, due to magnetized water show higher voids and macro-porosity in the
lower surface tension and higher viscosity of the magnetized surface decoration of the prepared samples.
water.35 The TEM photographs for the fresh and reduced samples in the
As shown in Fig. 1, after reduction at 900 K for 1 h, the non-treatment and magnetized water are demonstrated in Fig. 3. It
typical peaks attributed to the LaNiO3 and LaNiCoO3 perovs- can be found that the nanoparticles in the LaNiO3 perovskite
kites disappeared, while the characteristic diffraction peaks prepared by non-treatment water have pseudo-spherical shapes,
related to La2O3 (2y = 29.1, 30.1, 39.5, 46.4, and 55.71), metallic with the average particle size of the nanoparticles about 51 nm.
Fig. 2 The SEM images of the prepared catalysts. (a) LaNiO3 non-treatment, (b) LaNiO3 treatment, (c) LaNiCoO3 non-treatment, (d) LaNiCoO3
treatment.
10766 | New J. Chem., 2019, 43, 10763--10773 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2019
View Article Online
NJC Paper
Published on 13 June 2019. Downloaded by KEAN UNIVERSITY on 7/18/2019 2:03:05 PM.
Fig. 3 The TEM images of fresh (A) and reduced catalysts (B) and metal particle size distribution for the reduced catalysts. (a) LaNiO3 non-treatment,
(b) LaNiO3 treatment, (c) LaNiCoO3 non-treatment, (d) LaNiCoO3 treatment.
As shown in Fig. 3b, the average particle size of the catalyst results are presented in Fig. 4. Fig. 4(a and b) represent
prepared by magnetized water is lower and about 42 nm. More- the TPR profiles of the LaNiO3 sample prepared by the non-
over, a weak agglomeration is observed for both catalysts. In treatment and magnetized water, respectively. The LaNiO3
Fig. 3c, it can be observed that the presence of cobalt into the sample prepared by the non-treatment water exhibited three
perovskite structure, increases the catalyst particle size. Fig. 3 main reduction peaks at 583 K, 653 K and 813 K (Fig. 4a).
shows the formation of the metallic Ni0 and Co0 nanoparticles However, the sample prepared by the magnetized water shows
after the reduction of the LaNiO3 and LaNi0.5Co0.5O3 perovskites at two main reduction peaks at 663 K and 798 K (Fig. 4b). The low-
900 K for 1 h. In addition, the particle size distributions of the temperature reduction peak located at 583 K for the first
metal nanoparticles are shown in Fig. 3. The TEM image and sample, which is overlapping with the higher peak is related
calculated particle size distribution of the reduced LaNiO3 to the NiO species located on the LaNiO3 perovskite, which are
perovskite showed that smaller and more uniform metallic weakly interacting with the surface.44 This reduction peak is
Ni0 nanoparticles dispersed on the La2O3 support for treatment not seen in the TPR profile of the LaNiO3 perovskite prepared
catalysts were obtained.39–41 It was found that the metallic by magnetized water, because often the NiO species are appear-
particle size becomes larger after the cobalt substitution and ing in the perovskite structure, based on the XRD results.
as shown in Table 1, the TEM results are in good agreement The second peak in the TPR profile of the LaNiO3 perovskite
with the XRD results.28,29 prepared by non-treatment water (Fig. 4a), or the first peak in
the TPR profile of the LaNiO3 perovskite prepared by magnetized
3.4. Temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) of the water (Fig. 4b) indicates the reduction of the Ni3+ to Ni2+ with
samples attendant formation of La2Ni2O5 as follows:20,45
The reduction behavior of the perovskites prepared by non-
treatment and magnetized water was investigated, and the 2LaNiO3 + H2 - La2Ni2O5 + H2O (1)
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2019 New J. Chem., 2019, 43, 10763--10773 | 10767
View Article Online
Paper NJC
10768 | New J. Chem., 2019, 43, 10763--10773 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2019
View Article Online
NJC Paper
As shown in Fig. 5, the catalytic activities increased with reduction and thus the nickel dispersion on those supports can
increasing reaction temperature which can be expected for the be significantly improved. The more uniform activity of the
endothermic dry reforming reaction of methane (DRM). catalysts prepared by treatment water can be related to higher
concentrations of perovskite in the precursors of the catalysts
CH4 + CO2 2 2CO + 2H2 DH0298K = 247 kJ mol 1
(3) before reduction.
Fig. 6 shows the temperature-dependent H2/CO ratio and
As shown in Fig. 5, CH4 conversion is lower than CO2
Table 2 lists the hydrogen, CO and water production rates
conversion for all catalysts, due to the presence of side reac-
for the treatment and non-treatment catalysts. The water
tions such as reverse water-gas shift (RWGS) reaction (4), which
production indicated that the RWGS reaction occurs in parallel
is favored at high temperature.
with the DRM reaction in our reaction conditions.
Published on 13 June 2019. Downloaded by KEAN UNIVERSITY on 7/18/2019 2:03:05 PM.
Table 2 Production rates of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, water, and carbon deposition on the spent catalysts at 1023 K after 24 h TOS
1
Production rate (mol gcat h 1) TPH results
1
Catalyst H2 CO H2O CH4 formation (mmole CH4) Total carbon (mg gcat h 1)
LaNiO3 non 0.956 1.040 0.042 47.5 23.7
LaNiO3 treat 0.936 1.015 0.039 38.2 19.1
LaNi0.5Co0.5O3 non 0.831 0.949 0.059 36.4 18.2
LaNi0.5Co0.5O3 treat 0.790 0.902 0.056 30.4 15.2
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2019 New J. Chem., 2019, 43, 10763--10773 | 10769
View Article Online
Paper NJC
Published on 13 June 2019. Downloaded by KEAN UNIVERSITY on 7/18/2019 2:03:05 PM.
Fig. 8 TPH profiles of the spent catalysts; (a) LaNiO3 non-treatment, (b)
LaNiO3 treatment, (c) LaNiCoO3 non-treatment, (d) LaNiCoO3 treatment.
10770 | New J. Chem., 2019, 43, 10763--10773 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2019
View Article Online
NJC Paper
4. Conclusion
The LaNiO3 and LaNi0.5Co0.5O3 nanoparticles were prepared
through the co-precipitation method by using distilled and
magnetized distilled water. The XRD analysis clarified that
the partial Ni2+ substitution by Co cations enhanced the
rhombohedral cell parameter in the non-treated LaNi0.5Co0.5O3
perovskite. Besides, the parameter in the treated LaNi0.5Co0.5O3
is more than that of the non-treated ones. TPR analysis indicated
that although the first and second reduction peaks shifted toward
Published on 13 June 2019. Downloaded by KEAN UNIVERSITY on 7/18/2019 2:03:05 PM.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2019 New J. Chem., 2019, 43, 10763--10773 | 10771
View Article Online
Paper NJC
6 J. Mehr, K. Jozani, A. Nakhaei Pour and Y. Zamani, Influ- Ni–Mg nanoparticles, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40,
ence of MgO in the CO2 – steam reforming of methane to 12985–12992.
syngas by NiO/MgO/a-Al2O3 catalyst, React. Kinet. Catal. 22 A. Nakhaei Pour, E. Hosaini and M. Feyzi, Prediction of
Lett., 2002, 75, 267–273. cobalt particle size during catalyst deactivation in Fischer–
7 A. Nakhaei Pour, Y. Z. Kheirolah, J. Jozani and J. Yeganeh Tropsch synthesis, J. Iran. Chem. Soc., 2016, 13, 139–147.
Mehr, The influence of La2O3 and TiO2 on NiO/MgO/ 23 A. Nakhaei Pour and S. M. Modaresi, Methane Formation in
a-Al2O3, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 2005, 86, 157–162. Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis: Role of Nanosized Catalyst
8 Z. Bian, S. Das, M. H. Wai, P. Hongmanorom and S. Kawi, A Particles, J. Nano Res., 2015, 35, 39–54.
Review on Bimetallic Nickel-Based Catalysts for CO2 Reform- 24 S. Kawi, Y. Kathiraser, J. Ni, U. Oemar, Z. Li and E. T. Saw,
ing of Methane, ChemPhysChem, 2017, 18, 3117–3134. Progress in Synthesis of Highly Active and Stable Nickel-
Published on 13 June 2019. Downloaded by KEAN UNIVERSITY on 7/18/2019 2:03:05 PM.
9 D. Wierzbicki, R. Baran, R. De ˛bek, M. Motak, T. Grzybek Based Catalysts for Carbon Dioxide Reforming of Methane,
and M. E. Gálvez, et al., The influence of nickel content on ChemSusChem, 2015, 8, 3556–3575.
the performance of hydrotalcite-derived catalysts in CO2 25 G. R. Moradi, M. Rahmanzadeh and F. Khosravian,
methanation reaction, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42, The effects of partial substitution of Ni by Zn in LaNiO3
23548–23555. perovskite catalyst for methane dry reforming, J. CO2 Util.,
10 Z. Bian, S. Das, M. H. Wai, P. Hongmanorom and S. Kawi, A 2014, 6, 7–11.
Review on Bimetallic Nickel-Based Catalysts for CO2 Reform- 26 G. Valderrama, A. Kiennemann and M. R. Goldwasser, Dry
ing of Methane, ChemPhysChem, 2017, 18, 3117–3134. reforming of CH4 over solid solutions of LaNi1 xCoxO3,
11 J. W. Han, J. S. Park, M. S. Choi and H. Lee, Uncoupling the Catal. Today, 2008, 133–135, 142–148.
size and support effects of Ni catalysts for dry reforming of 27 X. Song, X. Dong, S. Yin, M. Wang, M. Li and H. Wang,
methane, Appl. Catal., B, 2017, 203, 625–632. Effects of Fe partial substitution of La2NiO4/LaNiO3 catalyst
12 Z. Li, M. Li, J. Ashok and S. Kawi, NiCo@NiCo phyllosilica- precursors prepared by wet impregnation method for the dry
te@CeO2 hollow core shell catalysts for steam reforming of reforming of methane, Appl. Catal., A, 2016, 526, 132–138.
toluene as biomass tar model compound, Energy Convers. 28 X. Gao, Z. Tan, K. Hidajat and S. Kawi, Highly reactive
Manage., 2019, 180, 822–830. Ni-Co/SiO2 bimetallic catalyst via complexation with oleyla-
13 Z. Li, M. Li, Z. Bian, Y. Kathiraser and S. Kawi, Design of mine/oleic acid organic pair for dry reforming of methane,
highly stable and selective core/yolk–shell nanocatalysts—A Catal. Today, 2017, 281, 250–258.
review, Appl. Catal., B, 2016, 188, 324–341. 29 Z. Bian and S. Kawi, Highly carbon-resistant Ni–Co/SiO2
14 Z. Li, Z. Wang and S. Kawi, Sintering and Coke Resistant catalysts derived from phyllosilicates for dry reforming of
Core/Yolk Shell Catalyst for Hydrocarbon Reforming, Chem- methane, J. CO2 Util., 2017, 18, 345–352.
CatChem, 2019, 11, 202–224. 30 S. K. Chawl, M. George, F. Patel and S. Patel, Production of
15 Z. Li, S. Das, P. Hongmanorom, N. Dewangan, M. H. Wai and Synthesis Gas by Carbon Dioxide Reforming of Methane
S. Kawi, Silica-based micro- and mesoporous catalysts for dry over Nickel based and Perovskite Catalysts, Procedia Eng.,
reforming of methane, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2018, 8, 2763–2778. 2013, 51, 461–466.
16 E.-H. Yang, Y.-S. Noh, S. Ramesh, S. S. Lim and D. J. Moon, 31 F. Moosavi and M. Gholizadeh, Magnetic effects on the
The effect of promoters in La0.9M0.1Ni0.5Fe0.5O3 (M = Sr, solvent properties investigated by molecular dynamics
Ca) perovskite catalysts on dry reforming of methane, Fuel simulation, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2014, 354, 239–247.
Process. Technol., 2015, 134, 404–413. 32 A. Nakhaei Pour, J. Karimi, S. Taghipoor, M. Gholizadeh and
17 Q. Zhu, H. Cheng, X. Zou, X. Lu, Q. Xu and Z. Zhou, M. Hashemian, Fischer–Tropsch synthesis over CNT-
Synthesis, characterization, and catalytic performance of supported cobalt catalyst: effect of magnetic field, J. Iran.
La0.6Sr0.4NixCo1–xO3 perovskite catalysts in dry reforming Chem. Soc., 2017, 14, 1477–1488.
of coke oven gas, Chin. J. Catal., 2015, 36, 915–924. 33 L. Holysz, A. Szczes and E. Chibowski, Effects of a static
18 L. G. Tejuca, J. L. G. Fierro and J. M. D. Tascón, in Structure magnetic field on water and electrolyte solutions, J. Colloid
and Reactivity of Perovskite-Type Oxides, ed. D. D. Eley, Interface Sci., 2007, 316, 996–1002.
H. Pines and P. B. Weisz, Academic Press, Advances in 34 A. Nakhaei Pour, M. Gholizadeh, M. Housaindokht,
Catalysis, 1989, pp. 237–328. F. Moosavi and H. Monhemi, A new method for preparing
19 I. Rivas, J. Alvarez, E. Pietri, M. J. Pérez-Zurita and M. R. mono-dispersed nanoparticles using magnetized water,
Goldwasser, Perovskite-type oxides in methane dry reform- Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 2017, 123, 269.
ing: effect of their incorporation into a mesoporous SBA-15 35 R. Cai, H. Yang, J. He and W. Zhu, The effects of magnetic
silica-host, Catal. Today, 2010, 149, 388–393. fields on water molecular hydrogen bonds, J. Mol. Struct.,
20 M. E. Rivas, J. Fierro, M. Goldwasser, E. Pietri, M. Perez- 2009, 938, 15–19.
Zurita and A. Griboval-Constant, et al., Structural features 36 R. V. Martı́n Algarra, L. Lahuerta Zamora, G. M. Antón Fos
and performance of LaNi1 xRhxO3 system for the dry and P. A. Alemán López, Magnetized Water: Science or
reforming of methane, Appl. Catal., A, 2008, 344, 10–19. Fraud?, J. Chem. Educ., 2008, 85, 1416.
21 A. Nakhaei Pour and M. Mousavi, Combined reforming of 37 S. M. D. Lima and J. M. Assaf, Synthesis and Characteriza-
methane by carbon dioxide and water: particle size effect of tion of LaNiO3, LaNi(1 x) FexO3 andLaNi(1 x)CoxO3
10772 | New J. Chem., 2019, 43, 10763--10773 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2019
View Article Online
NJC Paper
Perovskite Oxides for Catalysis Application, Mater. Res., 46 Z. Li and S. Kawi, Multi-Ni@Ni phyllosilicate hollow sphere
2002, 5, 329–335. for CO2 reforming of CH4: influence of Ni precursors on
38 G. Valderrama, A. Kiennemann and M. R. Goldwasser, structure, sintering, and carbon resistance, Catal. Sci. Tech-
La-Sr-Ni-Co-O based perovskite-type solid solutions as nol., 2018, 8, 1915–1922.
catalyst precursors in the CO2 reforming of methane, 47 Z. Li, L. Mo, Y. Kathiraser and S. Kawi, Yolk–Satellite–Shell
J. Power Sources, 2010, 195, 1765–1771. Structured Ni–Yolk@Ni@SiO2 Nanocomposite: Superb
39 Z. Li and K. Sibudjing, Facile Synthesis of Multi-Ni-Core@ Catalyst toward Methane CO2 Reforming Reaction, ACS
Ni Phyllosilicate@ CeO2 Shell Hollow Spheres with High Catal., 2014, 4, 1526–1536.
Oxygen Vacancy Concentration for Dry Reforming of CH4, 48 Z. Li, Y. Kathiraser and S. Kawi, Facile Synthesis of High
ChemCatChem, 2018, 10, 2994–3001. Surface Area Yolk–Shell Ni@Ni Embedded SiO2 via Ni
Published on 13 June 2019. Downloaded by KEAN UNIVERSITY on 7/18/2019 2:03:05 PM.
40 Z. Li, B. Jiang, Z. Wang and S. Kawi, High carbon resistant Phyllosilicate with Enhanced Performance for CO2 Reform-
Ni@Ni phyllosilicate@SiO2 core shell hollow sphere cata- ing of CH4, ChemCatChem, 2015, 7, 160–168.
lysts for low temperature CH4 dry reforming, J. CO2 Util., 49 J. Ashok, Y. Kathiraser, M. Ang and S. Kawi, Ni and/or Ni–Cu
2018, 27, 238–246. alloys supported over SiO2 catalysts synthesized via phyllo-
41 T. Maneerung, K. Hidajat and S. Kawi, K-doped LaNiO3 silicate structures for steam reforming of biomass tar reac-
perovskite for high-temperature water-gas shift of reformate tion, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2015, 5, 4398–4409.
gas: role of potassium on suppressing methanation, Int. 50 Y. Kathiraser, J. Ashok and S. Kawi, Synthesis and evalua-
J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42, 9840–9857. tion of highly dispersed SBA-15 supported Ni–Fe bimetallic
42 A. Nakhaei Pour and M. Housaindokht, Fischer–Tropsch catalysts for steam reforming of biomass derived tar reac-
Synthesis Over CNT Supported Cobalt Catalysts: Role of tion, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6, 4327–4336.
Metal Nanoparticle Size on Catalyst Activity and Products 51 J. Ashok and S. Kawi, Nickel–iron alloy supported over iron–
Selectivity, Catal. Lett., 2013, 143, 1328–1338. alumina catalysts for steam reforming of biomass tar model
43 A. Nakhaei Pour, M. R. Housaindokht, J. Zarkesh and compound, ACS Catal., 2013, 4, 289–301.
S. F. Tayyari, Studies of carbonaceous species in alkali 52 Z. Li, Z. Wang, B. Jiang and S. Kawi, Sintering resistant Ni
promoted iron catalysts during Fischer–Tropsch synthesis, nanoparticles exclusively confined within SiO2 nanotubes for
J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2010, 16, 1025–1032. CH4 dry reforming, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2018, 8, 3363–3371.
44 S. Dama, S. R. Ghodke, R. Bobade, H. R. Gurav and 53 Z. Li, Y. Kathiraser, J. Ashok, U. Oemar and S. Kawi,
S. Chilukuri, Active and durable alkaline earth metal sub- Simultaneous tuning porosity and basicity of nickel@
stituted perovskite catalysts for dry reforming of methane, nickel–magnesium phyllosilicate core–shell catalysts for
Appl. Catal., B, 2018, 224, 146–158. CO2 reforming of CH4, Langmuir, 2014, 30, 14694–14705.
45 E.-H. Yang, Y. S. Noh, G. H. Hong and D. J. Moon, Combined 54 M. Pawlyta, J.-N. Rouzaud and S. Duber, Raman microspec-
steam and CO2 reforming of methane over La1-xSrxNiO3 troscopy characterization of carbon blacks: spectral analysis
perovskite oxides, Catal. Today, 2018, 299, 242–250. and structural information, Carbon, 2015, 84, 479–490.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2019 New J. Chem., 2019, 43, 10763--10773 | 10773