New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle by DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/372544365
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Multipartite and Cycle By DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density
Preprint · July 2023

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8176262
CITATIONS
1 author:
Henry Garrett
528 PUBLICATIONS 25,893 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
On Algebraic Structures and Algebraic Hyperstructures View project
Featured Articles View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 23 July 2023.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By 3
DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density 4
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 ABSTRACT 8
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9
SuperHyperDOMINATION). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a pair 10
S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is 11
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION if the following expressions, terms and 12
statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION criteria holds. 13
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= 00
max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) | ∀Vi ∈ VN SHG , ∃Vj ∈ V 00 :
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
TV (Ei0 ) = min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) = min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
and FV0 (Ei0 ) = min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
}
In this scientific research, new configurations are introduced for the new 14
SuperHyperNotions, namely a DOMINATION and a Neutrosophic DOMINATION. 15
Two different SuperHyperDefinitions were started for them, but research has progressed 16
and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass are well-defined and 17
well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is implemented throughout this research. 18
To shine the light and importance of this research, a comparison between this 19
SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and basic SuperHyperNumbers is 20
presented. Definitions are followed by examples and examples, so clarifications are 21
guided by various tools. Applications are designed to understand the theoretical aspect 22
of this ongoing research. “Cancer diagnosis” are the things that are being researched to 23
explore the challenges that make sense in ongoing research and future research. It is a 24
special case. Cells are viewed in the intended manner. There are different types of them. 25
Some are individual and some are well modeled by groups of cells. All these types are 26
officially called “SuperHyperVertex”, but the relationships between them all are 27
officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. “SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic 28
SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and selected for research on “Cancer 29
Diagnosis”. Thus, these complex and dense super-hypermodels open avenues for 30
research on theoretical aspects and “cancer diagnosis”. Ways to pursue this scientific 31
research have been considered. It has also been formally collected in the form of several 32
questions and problems. It is useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of 33
DOMINATION. Since there are more ways to get type results a DOMINATION 34
becomes more understandable. In order to master the Neutrosophic DOMINATION, 35
there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “DOMINATION mastery”. 36
SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 37
method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Suppose a DOMINATION. If the 38
specified table contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and 39
hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is 40
redefined. ”values of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of 41
SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of 42
its vertices”, ”super edge values&max values of its vertices”, “super edge values” and 43
maximum values of its endpoints”. To get examples and structural examples, I would 44
like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on DOMINATION. 45
This is the original. Having the foundation of the previous definition in the 46
SuperHyperClass type would be disciplined. If there is a need to have all 47
DOMINATION until DOMINATION, then it is officially called “DOMINATION”, but 48
otherwise, it is not DOMINATION. There is some explanation for the original definition 49
titled “DOMINATION”. These two examples are further explored and distinguished 50
because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary methods based on a 51
dominant DOMINATION. Because of having DOMINATION, there is a need to 52
“re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic DOMINATION” and “neutrosophic 53
DOMINATION”. SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by 54
alphabetical labels. In this method, the position of tags is used to assign values. 55
Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is 56
redefined if the desired table exists. And if the desired table exists, a DOMINATION is 57
redefined to a “Neutrosophic DOMINATION”. It is useful to define a “Neutrosophic” 58
version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to obtain Neutrosophic type 59
results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic DOMINATION becomes more understandable. 60
Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a 61
number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, 62
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. 63
”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic 64
SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 65
SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is 66
SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges 67
elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number 68
of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one 69
SuperVertex as an intersection between two given SuperHyperEdges with two 70
exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an intersection between two 71
SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is SuperHyperStar and only one 72
SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. It is SuperHyperBipartite, 73
and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, 74
and these SuperVertices, which form two distinct sets, have no SuperHyperEdge in 75
common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is given as an 76
intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form 77
separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one SuperHyperEdge 78
among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a SuperVertex has a 79
SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel suggests specific 80
designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 81
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 82
the “special” cells and the “special group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 83
“SuperHyperVertices” and the common and desired properties between the “special” 84
cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 85
Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 86
of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 87
“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 88
of cancer” and the results and definitions will be introduced in redeemed methods. 89
Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. The specific region is assigned by the model 90
(called SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined 91
by this scientific research. Sometimes the movement of cancer is not easy to detect, 92
because there is certainty, uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects 93
of cancer on that area. This event leads us to choose another model [which is said to be 94
the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 95
happened and was done. There are some specific models, which are well known and 96
have names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The movements and 97
effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be 98
visualized with a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 99
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 100
the longest DOMINATION or the strongest DOMINATION in those Neutrosophic 101
SuperHyperModels. Some general results are presented for the longest DOMINATION 102
called DOMINATION and the strongest DOMINATION called Neutrosophic 103
DOMINATION. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have 104
only two SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at least three 105
SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of any cycle, 106
but literally, it is the transformation of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not 107
form. A basic introduction to the theory of DOMINATION Neutrosophic, 108
SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs is suggested. 109
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperDOMINATION, Cancer’s 110
Neutrosophic Recognition 111
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 112
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 113
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 114
In this scientific research, there are ideas in the prominent frameworks of motivations. I 115
try to bring motivations in narrative ways. Some Cells have faced attacks from the 116
established situation with cancer attacks in this case, there is some analysis embedded 117
in the case current situations where cells can be labeled as some groups and some 118
groups or individuals are overlabeled, all from behaviors to overcome cancer attacks. In 119
embedded situations, cell individuals and cell groups can be considered as “new groups”. 120
So it encourages us to find suitable SuperHyperModels for more appropriate analysis 121
about this dirty story. I found SuperHyperModels, officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” 122
and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, cells and groups of 123
cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and relationships between individual cells and 124
groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperEdges”. So this is another motivation for us 125
to do research on this SuperHyperModel based on “cancer diagnosis”. Sometimes, 126
things get worse. The situation has passed certainty and precise style. So it is beyond 127
them. There are three descriptions, i.e., degrees of determination, uncertainty, and 128
neutrality, for any object based on ambiguous forms, i.e., incomplete data, imprecise 129
data, and uncertain analysis. The second model can be considered in the previous 130
SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperGraph but officially 131
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Cancer is a disease, but the model is 132
supposed to understand what happens in this phenomenon. The special case of this 133
disease is considered and some parameters are used as consequences of the model. Cells 134
are attacked by the disease, but the movement of cancer is in a specific area. Knowing 135
the mind of cancer can help to find some cures for this disease. SuperHyperGraph and 136
Neutrosophic Super-HyperGraph are super-hypermodels used in “cancer diagnosis” and 137
both are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer 138
has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 139
SuperHyperModel proposes based on the links of cancer movements in the form of unity 140
styles with the formation of design and architecture officially called “DOMINATION”, 141
in the themes of specialized terms and common words. Particle for direct object. 142
Applied concepts under the investigation of the motivation of this scientific research. 143
The “SuperHyper” prefix refers to the theme of embedded styles for background 144
discovery for SuperHyperNotions. Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. The specific 145
region is assigned by the model (called SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of 146
movement of the cancer is determined by this scientific research. Sometimes the 147
movement of Cancer is not easy to identify because there is certainty, uncertainty and 148
neutrality about the movements and effects of Cancer in that region. This event leads 149
us to choose another model [said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph]. Easy 150
understanding of what happened and what was done. There are some specific models 151
that are well known and named and some general models. The movements and effects 152
of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be visualized by 153
a neurosophic superhyperpath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 154
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 155
DOMINATION or Neutrosophic DOMINATION for SuperHyperModels in it. Some 156
general results are presented. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic 157
SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at 158
least three SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of 159
cycle, but it is literally a form of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. 160
Question 2.1. How to define “SuperHyperNotions and to do research” to find the 161
“DOMINATION Rate” of any cell or groups of cells based on fixed cell or fixed group of 162
cells broadly, “DOMINATION Rate” based on fixed groups or fixed cells. Groups of 163
groups of cells? 164
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for “diagnosing cancer” in terms of 165
these chaotic and dense super-hypermodels in which embedded concepts are depicted? 166
This motivation to find concepts to use in this dense model is called 167
“SuperHyperGraphs”. So it motivates us to define different types of “DOMINATION” 168
and “neutrosophic DOMINATION” over “superhypergraph” and “neutrosophic 169
superhypergraph”. Then this scientific research has taken more motivations to define 170
SuperHyperClasses and find some connections among this SuperHyperNotion with other 171
SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to obtain examples and examples to clarify the 172
framework of this scientific research. The general results and some of the results about 173
some of the connections are the ways that the key point of this scientific research, 174
“diagnosis of cancer” is more understandable and clear. 175
The framework of this research is as follows. First, I will introduce the basic 176
definitions to clarify the basics. In the “Introductions” subsection, basic definitions 177
about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are introduced and 178
discussed in depth. Basic concepts are thoroughly explained and illustrated, and 179
sometimes a literature review is used to make sense of what is to come in the coming 180
sections. The main definitions and their explanations, along with some results on the 181
new concepts, DOMINATION and Neutrosophic DOMINATION, are specified in the 182
sections “DOMINATION” and “Neutrosophic DOMINATION”. In the concept of 183
dealing with results and in DOMINATION to create logic about the continuation of the 184
scientific research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform and Neutrosophic 185
SuperHyperUniform are introduced and as their consequences, the corresponding 186
SuperHyperClasses are specified to summarize the work done in this section, as “Results 187
on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. Going back 188
to the core concepts, clever steps towards common concepts to extend new concepts in 189
new frameworks, SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in “Results 190
on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” sections. 191
There is the initial scientific research on supergeneral relations and as the final and final 192
part of the theoretical scientific research is available in the section “General results”. 193
Some general SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and are known as fundamental 194
SuperHyperNotions, as in “General results” were extracted and discussed. 195
“DOMINATION”, “Neutrosophic DOMINATION”, “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and 196
“Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. There are curious questions about what 197
has been done about SuperHyperNotions to make sense of the superiority of this 198
scientific research and to discover the word “best” as a description and adjective of this 199
scientific research as presented in the “DOMINATION” section. The keyword of this 200
scientific research was presented in the section “Applications in cancer diagnosis” with 201
two cases and sub-sections “Case 1: Initial steps towards SuperHyperBipartite as 202
SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: Incremental steps towards SuperHyperMultiperdel as 203
SuperHyper. In the “open issues” section, there is a detailed examination and 204
recognition of what was done in this scientific research and what happened in this 205
scientific research in the form of “questions” and “issues” in order to understand this 206
scientific research in an outstanding style, the advantages and limitations of this 207
scientific research in addition to What has been done in this scientific research is stated 208
in the “conclusion and final remarks” section. 209
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 210
Research On the Redeemed Ways 211
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 212
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 213
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.5,p.2), 214
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 215
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 216
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 217
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [1],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 218
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 219
(Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 220
to Ref. [1]. 221
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 222
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 223
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.1,p.1). 224
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x; then the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 225
+
]− 0, 1 [. 226
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2). 227
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x. A single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by
truth-membership function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a
falsity-membership function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1].
A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,

indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [1],Definition 228
2.5,p.2). 229
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 230
pair S = (V, E), where 231
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 232
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 233
1, 2, . . . , n); 234
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 235
V; 236
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 237
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 238
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 239
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 240
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 241
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 242
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 243
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 244
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 245
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 246
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 247
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 248
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 249
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 250
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 251
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 252
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 253
Example 3.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 254
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 255
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 256
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 257
and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop 258
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus 259
in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 260
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 261
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 262
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 263
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 265
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a 266
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 267
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 268
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 269
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 270
• On the Figure (3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 271
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 272
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, 273
namely, E4 . 274
Figure 2. TThe Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModel-

ing on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 3. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 4. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
• On the Figure (4), there’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop 275
SuperHyperEdge on {F } and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on 276
{H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on {O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 277
• On the Figure (5),there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 278
SuperHyperEdge. 279
• On the Figure (6), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 280
SuperHyperEdge. 281
SuperHyperEdge. 283
SuperHyperEdge. 285
SuperHyperEdge. 287
SuperHyperEdge. 289
SuperHyperEdge. 291
SuperHyperEdge. 293
SuperHyperEdge. 295
SuperHyperEdge. 297
SuperHyperEdge. 299
Figure 5. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs mentioned as the SuperHy-

perModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 6. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 7. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs depicted SuperHyperMod-

eling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 8. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with dense SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 9. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a messy SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 10. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-embedding-

connected SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
Figure 11. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a SuperHyperModel-

Figure 12. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-multiple-

connected-style SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic
Example (3.6)


Figure 15. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with Linearly-Connected

SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)

Figure 17. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a Linearly-over-

packed SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
SuperHyperEdge. 301
SuperHyperEdge. 303
SuperHyperEdge. 305
SuperHyperEdge. 307
SuperHyperEdge. 309
SuperHyperEdge. 311
SuperHyperEdge. 313
Definition 3.7 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 314
(Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3). 315
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 316
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 317
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 318
characterized as follow-up items. 319
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 320
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 321





(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 322
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 323
HyperEdge; 324
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 325
SuperEdge; 326
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 327
SuperHyperEdge. 328
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 329
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 330
Definition 3.8 (t-norm). (Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3). 331
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 332
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 333
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 334
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 335
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 336
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 337
Definition 3.9. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.10. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.11. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 338
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 339
pair S = (V, E), where 340
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 341
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 342
1, 2, . . . , n); 343
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 344
V; 345
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 346
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 347
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 348
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 349
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 350
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 351
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 352
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 353
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 354
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 355
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 356
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 357
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 358
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 359
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 360
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 361
Definition 3.12 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 362
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 364
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 365
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 366
characterized as follow-up items. 367
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 368
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 369
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 370
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 371
HyperEdge; 372
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 373
SuperEdge; 374
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 375
SuperHyperEdge. 376
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 377
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 378
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 379
Definition 3.13. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 380
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 381
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 382
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 383
Definition 3.14. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 384
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 385
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 386
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 387
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 388
given SuperHyperEdges; 389
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 390
SuperHyperEdges; 391
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 392
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 393
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 394
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 395
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 396
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 397
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 398
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 399
common SuperVertex. 400
Example 3.15. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 401
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 402
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the notion. 403
Example 3.16. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 404
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 405
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is up. 406
Example 3.17. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 407
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 408
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 409
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 410
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is up. 411
Example 3.18. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 412
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 413
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 414
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 415
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 416
SuperHyperModel (26), is up. 417
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions in the Example

(3.15)
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

in the Neutrosophic Example (3.16)
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (3.17)
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Example (3.18)
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions in the

Example (3.19)
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (3.20)
Example 3.19. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 418
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 419
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 420
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 421
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 422
is up. 423
Example 3.20. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 424
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 425
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 426
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 427
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is up. 428
Definition 3.21. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)

S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 429
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 430
of following conditions hold: 431
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 432
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 433
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 434
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 435
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 436
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 437
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 438
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 439
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 440
0 0
Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 . 441
Definition 3.22. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 442
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 443
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 444
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 445
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 446
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 447
SuperHyperPath . 448
Definition 3.23 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 449
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 451
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 452
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 453
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 454
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 455
Definition 3.24 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 456
(NSHE)). (Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). 457
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 458
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 459
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 460
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 461
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 462
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 463
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 464
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 466
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 467
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 469
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 470
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 471
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 472
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 473
notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 474
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 475
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 476
Definition 3.25. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 477
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 478
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 479
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 480
understandable. 481
Definition 3.26. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 482
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 483
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , notion, SuperHyperStar, 484
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 485
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 486
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 487
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 488
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 489

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.26)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic notion. Since there’s 490
more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic notion more Neutrosophicly 491
understandable. 492
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 493
Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic notion”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 494
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 495
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 496
Definition 3.27. Assume a notion. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic notion if the 497
Table (3) holds. 498
Example 3.28. Referred to the Example (3.6), assume a Neutrosophic 499
SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures 500
in every Neutrosophic items. 501
SuperHyperGraph (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (4). 503
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
Vi (TVi , IVi , FVi ) Ei (TEi , IEi , FEi )
V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.03, 0.03, 0.03) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E3 (0, 0, 0)
- - E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0.08, 0.08, 0.08)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15)
V3 (0.05, 0.05, 0.05) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.12, 0.12, 0.12) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{F } (0.06, 0.06, 0.06) E5 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{H} (0.08, 0.08, 0.08) - -
{N } (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) - -
{O} (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) - -
Figure 29. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the

Neutrosophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (4.2)
4 Main Resultant 510
Definition 4.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 511
SuperHyperDOMINATION). 512
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 513
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 514
SuperHyperDOMINATION if the following expressions, terms and statements is called 515
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION criteria holds. 516
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= 00
max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) | ∀Vi ∈ VSHG , ∃Vj ∈ V 00 :
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
TV (Ei0 ) = min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) = min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
and FV0 (Ei0 ) = min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
}
Example 4.2. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S is a pair 517
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 518
SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (8). 520
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). 521
Assume SuperHyperPart {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperPart {Vi }12 i=7 . Consider a 522
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V4 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 523






Figure 36. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-








Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
SuperHyperDOMINATION since the following expressions, terms and statements is 524

V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION criteria holds. 525
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V4 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V4 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V4 }
= (0.52, 0.52, 0.52) =

X X X
= 00max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) | V5 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V1 ∈ V 00 :
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
TV (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (V5 ), TV 0 (V1 )]V5 ,V1 ∈E2 ,
IV0 (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[IV 0 (V5 ), IV 0 (V1 )]V5 ,V1 ∈E2 ,
and FV0 (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[FV 0 (V5 ), FV 0 (V1 )]V5 ,V1 ∈E2 ,
,
V6 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V1 ∈ V 00 :
TV0 (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (V5 ), TV 0 (V1 )]V5 ,V1 ∈E2 ,
,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V1 ∈ V 00 :
,
V2 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V4 ∈ V 00 :
,
V3 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V4 ∈ V 00 :
}
Assume SuperHyperPart {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperPart {Vi }12

i=7 . Consider a 529
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V4 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 530
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V4 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V4 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V4 }
= (0.76, 0.76, 0.76) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
V6 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V1 ∈ V 00 :
,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V1 ∈ V 00 :
,
V3 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V4 ∈ V 00 :
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 }. Then V 0 is called 537
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION since the following expressions, terms and 538
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
|(
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 }
X X
T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 }
= (1, 1, 1) =
X X X
= max
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) | V5 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V1 ∈ V 00 :
V SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
V6 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V1 ∈ V 00 :
,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V1 ∈ V 00 :
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 }. Then V 0 is called 544
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 }
= (1.24, 1.24, 1.24) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
,
V7 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V1 ∈ V 00 :
}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 }. Then V 0 is called 551
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V ,V ,V ,V ,V ,V } Vi ∈V 0 ={V
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 }
= (1.48, 1.48, 1.48) =

X X X
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
0
}
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 }. Then V 0 is called 558
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 }
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 } Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 ,V2 ,V3 ,V4 ,V5 ,V6 ,V7 }
= (1.72, 1.72, 1.72).
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi }12

i=1 . Then V 0
is called Neutrosophic 565
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }12
i=1
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }12
i=1 Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi }12
i=1
= (2.88, 2.88, 2.88).
Example 4.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 568
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 569
SuperHyperCycle (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (15). 571
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 572
SuperHyperExternal {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperInternal {Vi }34 i=8 . Consider a 573
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 }. Then V 0 is called 574
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vii=1,3,5,7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vii=1,3,5,7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vii=1,3,5,7 }
= (1.04, 1.04, 1.04) =

X X X
= 00max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vii=11,15,19,24,32−34 ∈ VSHG \ V , ∃V1 ∈ V :
TV0 (E1 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (Vii=11,15,19,24,32−34 ), TV 0 (V1 )]Vii=11,15,19,24,32−34 ,V1 ∈E1 ,
IV0 (E1 ) = 0.26 = min[IV 0 (Vii=11,15,19,24,32−34 ), IV 0 (V1 )]Vii=11,15,19,24,32−34 ,V1 ∈E1 ,
and FV0 (E1 ) = 0.26 = min[FV 0 (Vii=11,15,19,24,32−34 ), FV 0 (V1 )]Vii=11,15,19,24,32−34 ,V1 ∈E1 ,
, TV0 (E7 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (Vii=32−34 ), TV 0 (V1 )]Vii=32−34 ,V1 ∈E7 ,
IV0 (E7 ) = 0.26 = min[IV 0 (Vii=32−34 ), IV 0 (V1 )]Vii=32−34 ,V1 ∈E7 ,
and FV0 (E7 ) = 0.26 = min[FV 0 (Vii=32−34 ), FV 0 (V1 )]Vii=32−34 ,V1 ∈E7 ,
,
Vii=2,32,8−10,4,12−14 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V3 ∈ V 00 :
TV0 (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (Vii=2,32,8−10 ), TV 0 (V3 )]Vii=2,32,8−10 ,V3 ∈E2 ,
IV0 (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[IV 0 (Vii=12,32,8−10 ), IV 0 (V3 )]Vii=2,32,8−10 ,V3 ∈E2 ,
and FV0 (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[FV 0 (Vii=2,32,8−10 ), FV 0 (V3 )]Vii=2,32,8−10 ,V3 ∈E2 ,
, TV0 (E3 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (Vii=4,12−14 ), TV 0 (V3 )]Vii=4,12−14 ,V3 ∈E3 ,
IV0 (E3 ) = 0.26 = min[IV 0 (Vii=4,12−14 ), IV 0 (V3 )]Vii=4,12−14 ,V3 ∈E3 ,
and FV0 (E3 ) = 0.26 = min[FV 0 (Vii=4,12−14 ), FV 0 (V3 )]Vii=4,12−14 ,V3 ∈E3 ,
,
Vii=16−18,20−23 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V5 ∈ V 00 :
TV0 (E4 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (Vii=16−18 ), TV 0 (V5 )]Vii=16−18 ,V5 ∈E4 ,
,
Vii=6,25−30 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V7 ∈ V 00 :
TV0 (E6 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (Vii=6,25−30 ), TV 0 (V7 )]Vii=6,25−30 ,V7 ∈E6 ,
}
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 }. Then V 0 581
is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION since the following expressions, 582
terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION criteria holds. 583
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vii=1,3,5,7 ,Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vii=1,3,5,7 ,Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vii=1,3,5,7 ,Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 }
= (2.94, 2.94, 2.94) =

X X X
= 00max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vii=2,32,8−10,4,12−14 ∈ VSHG \ V , ∃V3 ∈ V :
TV0 (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (Vii=2,32,8−10 ), TV 0 (V3 )]Vii=2,32,8−10 ,V3 ∈E2 ,
IV0 (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[IV 0 (Vii=12,32,8−10 ), IV 0 (V3 )]Vii=2,32,8−10 ,V3 ∈E2 ,
and FV0 (E2 ) = 0.26 = min[FV 0 (Vii=2,32,8−10 ), FV 0 (V3 )]Vii=2,32,8−10 ,V3 ∈E2 ,
, TV0 (E3 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (Vii=4,12−14 ), TV 0 (V3 )]Vii=4,12−14 ,V3 ∈E3 ,
,
Vii=16−18,20−23 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V5 ∈ V 00 :
,
Vii=6,25−30 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V27 ∈ V 00 :
TV0 (E6 ) = 0.26 = min[TV 0 (Vii=6,25−30 ), TV 0 (V27)]Vi ,V27 ∈E6 ,
i=6,25−30

}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 588
V 0 = {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 , Vii=32,8−10,4,12−14 }. Then V 0 is called 589
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vii=1,3,5,7 ,Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 ,Vii=32,8−10,4,12−14 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vii=1,3,5,7 ,Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 ,Vii=32,8−10,4,12−14 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vii=1,3,5,7 ,Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 ,Vii=32,8−10,4,12−14 }
= (4.86, 4.86, 4.86) =

X X X
= 00max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vii=16−18,20−23 ∈ VSHG \ V , ∃V5 ∈ V :
,
Vii=6,25−30 ∈ VSHG \ V 00 , ∃V27 ∈ V 00 :
i=6,25−30

}
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 596
V 0 = {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 , Vii=32,8−10,4,12−14 , Vii=16−18,20−23 }. Then 597
V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION since the following expressions, 598
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION criteria holds. 599
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vii=1,3,5,7 ,Vii=2,11,15,19,24,27,32−34 ,Vii=32,8−10,4,12−14 ,Vii=16−18,20−23 }
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
= (6.54, 6.54, 6.54) =

X X X
= 00max |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VSHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vii=6,25−30 ∈ VSHG \ V , ∃V27 ∈ V :
i=6,25−30

}
SuperHyperExternal {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperInternal {Vi }34

Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = VSHG . Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 604
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 =VSHG
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 =VSHG Vi ∈V 0 =VSHG
= (8.24, 8.24, 8.24).
}

X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 =VSHG
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
= (8.26, 8.26, 8.26).
}

X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 =VSHG
X X
I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
= (8.28, 8.28, 8.28).
}
5 Main Result 621
Theorem 5.1. (Main Result and Main Theorem). 622
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite has the letter z. The notion on 623
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite and Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle don’t 624
coincide. 625
Proof. 626
(i). Let 627
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
628
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 629
There’s a new way to redefine as 630
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 631
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION. 632
The latter is straightforward. 633
(ii). Let 634
P :
ViEXT ERN AL , Ei∗ ,
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
635
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
is a longest SuperHyperDOMINATION taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperCycle 636
ESHC : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 637

The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one Neutrosophic 640
SuperHyperDOMINATION. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions 641
based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION could be applied. The unique embedded 642
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION proposes some longest Neutrosophic 643
SuperHyperDOMINATION excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 644
straightforward. 645
Proposition 5.2. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a pair

S = (V, E). Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION set is as follows.
P
{V1Pi , V1 j }.
Proof. Let 646
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
647
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.3. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a pair

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION number is as follows.
2 × 0.26.
Proof. Let 653
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
654
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.4. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a pair 660
S = (V, E). Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The 661
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION set is as follows. 662
{
ViEXT ERN AL ,
EXT ERN AL
Vi+2 ,...
}
Proof. Let 663
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
664
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.5. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a pair

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION number is as follows.
|V |
× 0.26.
2
Proof. Let 675
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
676
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Definition 5.6. (Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite and Uniform 687
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle). 688
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every 689
pair of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 690
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 691
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called 692
Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite. 693
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair of 694
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 695
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 696
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 697
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. 698
Proposition 5.7. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a

pair S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION set is as follows.
P
{V1Pi , V1 j }.
Proof. Let 699
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
700
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.8. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM be a

pair S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION number is as follows.
2 × 0.26.
Proof. Let 706
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
707
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.9. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a pair 713
S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION set is as follows. 714
{
ViEXT ERN AL ,
EXT ERN AL
Vi+2 ,...
}
Proof. Let 715
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
716
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.10. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (ESHC) S be a

pair S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION number is as follows.
|V |
× 0.26.
2
Proof. Let 727
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
728
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.11. (Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite and Neutrosophic 739
SuperHyperCycle). 740
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). 741
Assume two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, from different SuperHyperParts, 742
have the maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have 743
the same maximum letter, are in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION set. 744
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume every 745
Neutrosophic EXTERNAL SuperHyperVertices with distance two have the 746
maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same 747
maximum letter, are in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION set. 748
Proof. 749
(i). Let 750
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
751
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

(ii). Let 757
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
758
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.12. (Embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Embedded 769
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar). 770
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 771
two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, from different SuperHyperParts, is in every 772
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION set. 773
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then every 774
Neutrosophic EXTERNAL SuperHyperVertices with distance two is in every 775
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION set. 776
Proof. 777
(i). Let 778
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
779
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

(ii). Let 785
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
786
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

6 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 797
Neutrosophic Recognition 798
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 799
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 800
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 801
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 802
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 803
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 804
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 805
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 806
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 807
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 808
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 809
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 810
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 811
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 812
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 813
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 814
happened and what’s done. 815
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 816
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 817
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 818
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 819
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperDOMINATION, SuperHyperStar, 820
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to 821
find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION or the Neutrosophic 822
SuperHyperDOMINATION in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. 823
Figure 43. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperDOMINATION
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
7 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 824
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 825
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 826
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (43), the 827
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 828
featured. 829
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (43) and the Table (22), the Neutrosophic 830
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 831
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 832
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 833
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the 834
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (43), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION. 835
Figure 44. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
8 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 836
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 837
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 838
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (44), the 839
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 840
Neutrosophic featured. 841
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (44) and the Table (23), the Neutrosophic 842
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 843
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 844
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 845
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 846
SuperHyperModel (44), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION. 847
9 Wondering Open Problems But As The 848
Directions To Forming The Motivations 849
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 850
The SuperHyperDOMINATION and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION are defined 851
on a real-world application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 852
Question 9.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 853
recognitions? 854
Question 9.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperDOMINATION and 855
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION? 856
Question 9.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 857
compute them? 858
Question 9.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 859
SuperHyperDOMINATION and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION? 860
Problem 9.5. The SuperHyperDOMINATION and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION do 861
a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and they’re based on 862
SuperHyperDOMINATION, are there else? 863
Problem 9.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 864
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 865
Problem 9.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 866
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 867
10 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 868
In this section, closing and concluding remarks are presented. The drawbacks of this 869
scientific research are shown. Some advantages and disadvantages of this scientific 870
research are highlighted. 871
This scientific research uses some approaches to further understand the Neutrosophic 872
SuperHyperGraphs. In this effort, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the 873
DOMINATION. For this reason, in the second definition, the original definition of the 874
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based on 875
the new Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph definition, the new SuperHyperNotion, 876
Neutrosophic DOMINATION, finds a suitable background to implement some results 877
on. Some SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses are the 878
subjects of this scientific research on modeling areas that are subject to cancer attacks 879
in order to recognize this disease as mentioned under the title “Cancer Diagnosis”. To 880
formalize the SuperHyperNotion, DOMINATION, SuperHyperClasses and new 881
SuperHyperClasses instances are introduced. Some general results are summarized in 882
the DOMINATION and Neutrosophic DOMINATION sections. Clarifications, examples, 883
and literature reviews go all the way. In this scientific research, the literature review has 884
met the lines containing concepts and results. SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 885
SuperHyperGraph are super-hypermodels in “cancer diagnosis” and both are the 886
foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer has occurred 887
in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 888
SuperHyperModel proposes SuperHyperNotions, formally called “DOMINATION”, 889
based on the connections of Cancer’s movements in the longest and strongest styles with 890
the formation of design and architecture, in terms of terms and whispering words. . The 891
“SuperHyper” prefix refers to the topic of embedded styles to explore the background of 892
SuperHyperNotions. In the table (24), the advantages and ways of this scientific 893
research are specified, pointed out and expressed. 894
11 Background 895
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this scientific research. In what 896
follows, there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 897
Table 24. A look at this scientific research and beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. DOMINATION
3. Neutrosophic DOMINATION 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. modeling cancer diagnoses
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “New Ideas In Recognition of 898
Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot” in Ref. [1] 899
by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 900
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms with 901
introducing used neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published 902
in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Current Trends in Mass Communication 903
(CTMC)” with ISO abbreviation “Curr Trends Mass Comm” in volume 2 and issue 1 904
with pages 32-55. 905
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 906
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 907
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 908
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 909
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 910
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 911
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 912
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 913
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 914
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 915
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 916
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s 917
Recognition and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and 918
Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [3] by Henry 919
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 920
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions 921
and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. It’s published in prestigious and fancy 922
journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 923
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 924
volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 925
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 926
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 927
SuperHyperNumbers. 928
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 929
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 930
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2023). 931
In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and 932
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using 933
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 934
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and 935
Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques 936
Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 6 with pages 221-307. The research article studies 937
deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 938
It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and 939
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 940
titled “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super 941
Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper 942
Classes” in Ref. [5] by Henry Garrett (2022). In this research article, a novel approach 943
is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on 944
fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of 945
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is 946
entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 947
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 948
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 950
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 951
SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled 952
“neutrosophic co-degree and neutrosophic degree alongside chromatic numbers in the 953
setting of some classes related to neutrosophic hypergraphs” in Ref. [6] by Henry 954
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 955
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms without 956
using neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 957
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Current Trends in Computer 958
Science Research (JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in 959
choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 961
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background. The research 962
article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic 963
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 964
background. In some articles are titled “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing 965
Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 966
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [7] by Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — 967
(Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett 968
(2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of Confrontation under 969
Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 970
in Ref. [9] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer 971
Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique 972
inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [10] by 973
Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 974
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), 975
“The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells Toward The 976
Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets 977
Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory 978
Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [12] by Henry 979
Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case 980
of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition 981
Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), 982
“Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic 983
Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in 984
Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the 985
Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 986
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed 987
SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 988
Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 989
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 990
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 991
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 992
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett 993
(2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well- 994
SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” in Ref. [19] by Henry Garrett 995
(2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 996
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 997
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) 998
SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions 999
And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [20] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1000
“Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 1001
To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [21] by 1002
Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1003
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in Ref. [22] by 1004
Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1005
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph 1006
With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions And Related 1007
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1008
“SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With 1009
SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1010
“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 1011
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s 1012
Treatments” in Ref. [25] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating and 1013
SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 1014
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [26] by Henry Garrett 1015
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 1016
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [203] by Henry 1017
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 1018
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 1019
and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [204] by Henry Garrett 1020
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 1021
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels 1022
Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [205] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1023
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 1024
In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called 1025
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [206] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect 1026
Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding 1027
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [209] by 1028
Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1029
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 1030
SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [210] by Henry 1031
Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1032
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in 1033
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [213] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1034
“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel 1035
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [216] by Henry 1036
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1037
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1038
in Ref. [217] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 1039
Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1040
Ref. [218] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1041
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1042
Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [219] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1043
1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 1044
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [220] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1045
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1046
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [221] by Henry Garrett 1047
(2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 1048
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [232] by Henry 1049
Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1050
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic 1051
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [233] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [4–233], there 1052
are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 1053
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph alongside scientific research books 1054
at [234–363]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 1055
readers, 4728 and 5721 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [364, 365]. 1056
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1057
proposed as book in Ref. [364] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1058
Scholar and has more than 4728 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 1059
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 1060
of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 1061
SuperHyperGraph theory. 1062
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1063
proposed as book in Ref. [365] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1064
Scholar and has more than 5721 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 1065
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 1066
notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in 1067
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 1068
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 1069
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 1070
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 1071
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 1072
framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in 1073
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–233] 1074
alongside scientific research books at [234–363]. Two popular scientific research books 1075
in Scribd ,in the terms of high readers, 4728 and 5721 respectively, on neutrosophic 1076
science is on [364, 365]. 1077
References 1078
1. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 1079
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Curr Trends Mass Comm 1080
2(1) (2023) 32-55. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/new- 1081
ideas-in-recognition-of-cancer-and-neutrosophic-super-hypergraph-as-hyper- 1082
tool-on-super-toot.pdf) 1083
2. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 1084
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 1085
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 1086
(2023) 35-47. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/some- 1087
super-hyper-degrees-and-cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper- 1088
graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs-alongside-a.pdf) 1089
3. Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 1090
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 1091
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 1092
(2023) 136-148. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/a- 1093
research-on-cancers-recognition-and-neutrosophic-super-hypergraph-by- 1094
eulerian-super-hyper-cycles-and-hamiltonian-sets-.pdf) 1095
4. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1096
SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1097
Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(6) 1098
(2023) 221-307. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access- 1099
articles/neutrosophic-1failed-superhyperforcing-in-the-superhyperfunction-to- 1100
use-neutrosophic-superhypergraphs-on-cancers-neutros.pdf) 1101
5. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Co-degree and Neutrosophic Degree alongside 1102
Chromatic Numbers in the Setting of Some Classes Related to Neutrosophic 1103
Hypergraphs”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. (doi: 1104
10.33140/JCTCSR.02.01.04) 1105
6. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 1106
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 1107
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 1108
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 1109
7. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 1110
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1111
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1112
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1113
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 1114
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 1115
8. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 1116
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 1117
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1118
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 1119
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 1120
9. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1121
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1122
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 1123
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1124
10. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1125
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1126
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1127
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1128
11. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 1129
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1130
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 1131
12. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1132
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1133
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1134
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1135
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1136
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1137
13. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1138
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1139
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1140
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1141
14. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1142
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1143
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1144
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1145
15. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1146
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1147
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1148
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1149
16. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 1150
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1151
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1152
17. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 1153
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 1154
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 1155
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1156
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1158
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1159
19. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 1160
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1161
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1162
20. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1163
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1164
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1166
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1170
22. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1171
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1172
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1173
23. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1174
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1175
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1176
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1177
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1178
24. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1179
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 1180
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1181
25. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1182
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1183
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1184
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1185
26. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 1186
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 1187
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1188
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1189
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect Search As Hyper Perf On Super 1191
Perfidy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104836). 1192
28. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Perfidy By Hyper Perf Of 1193
SuperHyperPerfect Search In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1194
SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104857). 1195
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple 1197
On Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092796). 1198
30. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1199
Strict Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1200
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1203
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8088438). 1204
32. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Unequal 1205
Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1206
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1209
Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8084436). 1210
34. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Strict 1211
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Connective As Hyper Conceit On Super 1215
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080100). 1216
36. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse Strict 1217
Connective In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1218
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080068). 1219
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1221
Super Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8078445). 1222
38. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Unequal 1223
Connective Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1224
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1227
40. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Strict 1229
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1233
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8072171). 1234
42. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1235
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1239
44. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Equal 1241
SuperHyperGraph By Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1245
46. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Dimension 1247
Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1248
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1251
48. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse 1253
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1257
50. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Equal 1259
SuperHyperGraph By Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On Super 1263
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8051346). 1264
52. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Connective 1265
SuperHyperGraph By United Dominating As Hyper Ultra On Super Units”, 1269
54. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Units By Hyper Ultra Of United 1271
SuperHyperGraph By Zero Forcing As Hyper ford On Super forceps”, Zenodo 1275
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8017246). 1276
56. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super forceps By Hyper ford Of Zero Forcing In 1277
Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1278
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020128). 1279
SuperHyperGraph By Matrix-Based As Hyper mat On Super matte”, Zenodo 1281
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978571). 1282
58. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super mat By Hyper matte Of Matrix-Based In 1283
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1284
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978857). 1285
SuperHyperGraph By Dominating-Edges As Hyper Dome On Super Eddy”, 1287
60. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Dome Of 1289
Dominating-Edges In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1290
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Gap As Hyper Gape On Super Gab”, Zenodo 2023, 1293
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7916595). 1294
62. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gab By Hyper Gape Of Edge-Gap In 1295
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923632). 1297
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1299
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904698). 1300
64. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 1301
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1302
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1305
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1306
10.5281/zenodo.7904529). 1307
66. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 1308
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1309
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1310
10.5281/zenodo.7904401). 1311
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1313
Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7871026). 1314
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1316
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1319
Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1322
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1325
Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855661). 1326
Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1328
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1331
74. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 1333
Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1334
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1337
Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1340
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1343
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7839333). 1344
Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1346
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super 1349
EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7834229). 1350
Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1352
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1355
Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1358
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1361
Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1364
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1367
10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 1368
SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On 1370
Super initial EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365). 1371
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut On Super 1373
EULA-Path-Cut”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809358). 1374
Eulerian-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1376
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1379
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1382
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806767). 1383
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1385
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1388
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1389
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 1390
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1392
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 1393
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1395
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799902). 1396
95. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 1397
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1398
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1401
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1404
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793372). 1405
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1407
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7791952). 1408
Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1410
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1413
Hamiltonian-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1416
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1419
Hamiltonian-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1422
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, 1425
Hamiltonian-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1428
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1431
Trace-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1434
108. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 1436
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1437
Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7771831). 1438
Trace-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1440
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1443
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20913.25446). 1444
111. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 1445
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7764916). 1447
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1449
Edge-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1452
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1455
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.10089). 1456
Edge-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1458
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.34564). 1459
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Cut As Hyper Edify On Super Eddy”, ResearchGate 1461
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11377.76644). 1462
117. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 1463
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1464
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23750.96329). 1465
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1467
Vertex-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1470
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1473
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30212.81289). 1474
Vertex-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1476
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Cut As Hyper Vertu On Super Vertigo”, 1479
123. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 1481
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32467.25124). 1483
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1485
125. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1487
Stable-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1488
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Decompositions As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1491
127. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 1493
Stable-Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1494
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Cut As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1497
129. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 1499
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20170.24000). 1501
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Neighbors As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1503
131. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1505
Clique-Neighbors In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1506
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Decompositions As Hyper Decompile On Super 1509
Decommission”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18780.87683). 1510
Clique- Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1512
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Cut As Hyper Click On Super Cliche”, 1515
135. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 1517
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27392.30721). 1519
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy”, ResearchGate 1521
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321). 1522
SuperHyperGraph By List- Coloring As Hyper List On Super Lisle”, 1524
138. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 1526
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16356.04489). 1528
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark ”, ResearchGate 1530
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 1531
140. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 1532
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 1533
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 1534
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super 1536
Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 1537
142. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 1538
Edge-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1539
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, 1542
144. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 1544
Vertex-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1545
SuperHyperGraph By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super Returns”, 1548
146. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 1550
Tree-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1551
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, 1554
148. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 1556
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 1558
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On 1560
Super Waves”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 1561
150. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 1562
SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1563
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On 1566
Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 1567
152. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 1568
SuperHyperEdge-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1569
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super 1572
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 1573
154. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 1574
SuperHyperK-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1575
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 1578
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 1579
156. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 1580
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1581
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 1584
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 1585
158. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 1586
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1587
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 1590
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 1591
160. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 1592
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1593
161. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 1595
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1596
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 1599
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 1600
163. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 1601
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1602
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 1605
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 1606
165. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 1607
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1608
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 1611
167. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 1613
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1614
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, 1617
169. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 1619
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1620
170. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 1622
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1623
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, 1626
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 1629
173. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 1631
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1632
174. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 1634
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1635
175. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1637
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 1638
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 1639
176. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1640
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 1641
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 1642
177. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 1643
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1644
178. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 1646
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 1647
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 1648
179. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 1649
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1650
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 1651
180. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1652
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 1653
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1654
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 1655
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1658
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 1659
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1662
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 1663
183. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1664
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1666
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 1667
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1670
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 1671
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1674
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 1675
186. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 1676
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 1677
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1678
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 1679
187. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 1680
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 1681
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 1682
188. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 1683
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 1684
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 1685
189. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1686
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions 1687
of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 1688
190. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 1689
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 1690
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 1691
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 1692
191. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 1693
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 1694
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 1695
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 1696
192. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 1697
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 1698
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 1699
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1700
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 1701
193. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 1702
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 1703
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 1704
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1705
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 1706
194. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 1707
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 1708
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 1709
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 1710
195. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 1711
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1712
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 1713
196. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1714
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1715
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1717
197. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1718
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1719
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1720
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1721
198. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1722
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 1723
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 1724
199. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1725
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1726
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1727
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1728
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1729
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1730
200. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1731
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1732
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1733
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1734
201. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1735
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1736
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1737
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1738
202. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1739
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1740
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1741
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1742
203. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 1743
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 1744
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 1745
204. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 1746
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 1747
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 1748
205. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1750
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1751
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1752
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1753
206. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 1754
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 1755
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 1756
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 1757
207. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1758
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1759
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1760
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1761
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1763
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1764
209. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1765
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 1766
210. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1768
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 1769
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 1770
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1775
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1779
213. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1780
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1781
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 1782
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 1783
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1786
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1788
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1789
216. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 1790
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1791
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1794
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 1795
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1797
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 1798
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1801
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 1802
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1804
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 1805
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1808
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 1809
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1811
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1812
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 1814
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1819
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1820
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 1824
2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 1825
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1828
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 1831
228. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1832
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1833
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1834
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1835
229. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1836
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1837
in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1838
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 1839
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1842
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1843
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1846
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 1847
232. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 1848
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1849
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 1850
233. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1851
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 1852
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1853
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 1854
234. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect Search In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1855
Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104880). 1856
235. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. 1857
Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092816). 1858
236. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1859
Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8090194). 1860
237. Henry Garrett, “Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1861
238. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Connective In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1863
239. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1865
240. Henry Garrett, “Strict Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1867
241. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1869
242. Henry Garrett, “Equal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1871
243. Henry Garrett, “Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1873
244. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1875
245. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1877
246. Henry Garrett, “Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1879
247. Henry Garrett, “United Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1881
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8027488). 1882
248. Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1883
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020181). 1884
249. Henry Garrett, “Matrix-Based In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1885
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978921). 1886
250. Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1887
10.5281/zenodo.7943878). 1888
251. Henry Garrett, “Dominating-Edges In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1889
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7943871). 1890
252. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Gap In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1891
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923786). 1892
253. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1893
254. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 1895
255. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1897
256. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1899
257. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1901
258. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1903
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7854561). 1904
259. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1905
260. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1907
261. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1909
262. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1911
263. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1913
264. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1915
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812750). 1916
265. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1917
266. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 1919
267. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1921
268. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1923
269. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1925
270. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1927
271. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1929
272. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1931
273. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1933
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7783791). 1934
274. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1935
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7780123). 1936
275. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1937
276. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1939
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 1940
277. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1941
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7766174). 1942
278. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1943
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7762232). 1944
279. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1945
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7758601). 1946
280. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1947
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 1948
281. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1949
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7750995) . 1950
282. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1951
283. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1953
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7747236). 1954
284. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1955
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7742587). 1956
285. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1957
286. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1959
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7734719). 1960
287. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Neighbors In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1961
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730484). 1962
288. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1963
289. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1965
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7722865). 1966
290. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1967
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 1968
291. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1969
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 1970
292. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1971
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706415). 1972
293. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1973
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706063). 1974
294. Henry Garrett, “Tree-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1975
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7701906). 1976
295. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1977
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 1978
296. Henry Garrett, “(i,j)-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1979
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7694876). 1980
297. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 1981
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7679410). 1982
298. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1983
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7675982). 1984
299. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1985
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7672388). 1986
300. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1987
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 1988
301. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1989
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 1990
302. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 1991
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7659162). 1992
303. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1993
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 1994
304. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1995
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 1996
305. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1997
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 1998
306. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 1999
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 2000
307. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2001
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 2002
308. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2003
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 2004
309. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2005
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 2006
310. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2007
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 2008
311. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2009
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 2010
312. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2011
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 2012
313. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2013
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 2014
314. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2015
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 2016
315. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2017
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 2018
316. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2019
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 2020
317. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2021
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 2022
318. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2024
319. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2025
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2026
320. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2027
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 2028
321. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2029
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2030
322. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2031
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2032
323. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2033
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2034
324. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2035
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 2036
325. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2037
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 2038
326. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2039
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 2040
327. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2041
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2042
328. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2043
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2044
329. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2045
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2046
330. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2047
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7557063). 2048
331. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2049
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 2050
332. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2051
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2052
333. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2053
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2054
334. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2055
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2056
335. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2057
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2058
336. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2059
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 2060
337. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2061
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 2062
338. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2063
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2064
339. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2065
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2066
340. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2067
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2068
341. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2069
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2070
342. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2071
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2072
343. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2073
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2074
344. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2075
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2076
345. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2077
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2078
346. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2079
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2080
347. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2081
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2082
348. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2083
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2084
349. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2085
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2086
350. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2087
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2088
351. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2089
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2090
352. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2091
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2092
353. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2093
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2094
354. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2095
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2096
355. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2097
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2098
356. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2099
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2100
357. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2101
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2102
358. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2103
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2104
359. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2105
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2106
360. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2107
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2108
361. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2109
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2110
362. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2111
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 2112
363. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2113
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 2114
364. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2115
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 2116
365. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2117
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 2118
View publication stats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle by DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle by DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With

Preprint · July 2023

528 PUBLICATIONS 25,893 CITATIONS

On Algebraic Structures and Algebraic Hyperstructures View project

Featured Articles View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By 3

DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density 4

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9

SuperHyperDOMINATION). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a pair 10

S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is 11

called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION if the following expressions, terms and 12

statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDOMINATION criteria holds. 13

SuperHyperNotions, namely a DOMINATION and a Neutrosophic DOMINATION. 15

and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass are well-defined and 17

well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is implemented throughout this research. 18

SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and basic SuperHyperNumbers is 20

presented. Definitions are followed by examples and examples, so clarifications are 21

officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. “SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic 28

SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and selected for research on “Cancer 29

questions and problems. It is useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of 33

becomes more understandable. In order to master the Neutrosophic DOMINATION, 35

there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “DOMINATION mastery”. 36

SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 37

specified table contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and 39

hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is 40

redefined. ”values of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of 41

SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of 42

like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on DOMINATION. 45

SuperHyperClass type would be disciplined. If there is a need to have all 47

DOMINATION until DOMINATION, then it is officially called “DOMINATION”, but 48

because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary methods based on a 51

dominant DOMINATION. Because of having DOMINATION, there is a need to 52

“re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic DOMINATION” and “neutrosophic 53

DOMINATION”. SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by 54

Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is 56

redefined to a “Neutrosophic DOMINATION”. It is useful to define a “Neutrosophic” 58

results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic DOMINATION becomes more understandable. 60

Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a 61

number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, 62

SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. 63

”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic 64

SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 65

SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is 66

SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges 67

elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number 68

of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one 69

SuperVertex as an intersection between two given SuperHyperEdges with two 70

exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an intersection between two 71

SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is SuperHyperStar and only one 72

SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. It is SuperHyperBipartite, 73

common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is given as an 76

intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form 77

separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one SuperHyperEdge 78

among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a SuperVertex has a 79

SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel suggests specific 80

designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 81

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 82

cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 85