a 2016 4% 95 11 J 46 www.gdehem.com 9843 OHM 325 AS TAVSLAE SE ERAS FAT Fe, #0, Ee, tae _ ER CRIED fe T9000; 2. BIE AE aE eo: SH, PRPS HIAK 719000) SETAC eae IAN SRS. SETHE TAC AR OONN, Rh RE. RK MALE AR MLS ‘te. AC. MOAR NEPA EIN AN. IRINA IH KB, LE 120-160 HHA AR LA AAR, AB 5.42 v6. ERMA ARH AN AL A AA FCN ET PERRIN ARDEA AEH AKERS, eM, OSTA RAT EM ALAN. ST RR AT A eR REM NLAL. eeeiny ais Res ska, ALE Cerro ewes (emt 1007-1865 20161-00462 Study on Pyrolysis of Huating Coal with Different Particle Sizes Chen sinzhong'?, Li Sin'?, Kang Yuhong'?, Yan Long’ (1, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yulin University, Yulin 719000: 2, Shanxi Province Key Laboratory of Low Metamorphic Coal Clean Utilization, Yalin 719000, China) Abstract: The used of Fischer Assy o Huang cal pyrolysis, sted and analyzed the effets of paverz coal particle ize om the ar odin rae, the ‘pent of plverial coal, arbocoal and element content Were analyzed. The results showed that withthe decreased ofthe pulverid coal particle sz, coal a to Increased ity then decreased, the ra cal and eabocoal aperture ll showed ated a intease, patil size ranges from 1201 160 mesh, a Yield pyrolysis ‘va he highest, an tar yeh was $42 9, Tie showed the ape of pulverized colin he pyrolysis pres foal tar had ages influence onthe precipitation, bt the palveried coal preparation processed the interparticle ton eliston eased by the Vela ecipitation was the main reson for rdcing oa Ye In tuition, the elemental analysis ests showed atthe sulfur content increased wih the deresed ofthe parce sv, the paper expound the nence of slr content o the coal ar yield mechanism Keywords pyrolysis price nizes taryel aperture ‘ie AOA 21 EE (TH UN REAR a ee PA RES ARMM A Se ADR A FF 2 A A RUST MCE LAOH I EMAAR CY FLA LAER — RAMEE RR RCN AEH. Ait ANDAR RMON EP ATLL PRI, RAE EIREUHEGRAL) «ARIE ELIRAL IRE AAR ARN Je AE A (8 oR ee AAP HOSP eS SAAR BUA PL AR 2 ae EAT RCRA, SEMEN 33167 CE, IELTS TAR, NAL RE ARA RRG R RHEN iene den aie soamte LAM cremate SCAIIGRCR EE ROT ARNE. ETCAP UT TENE Aa GMa, Tah am AL Ee Rc eM 9 FEET PERTAIN A OE 1 Se STE LAAs AERC 3s AGAR, SHER 6AM THN, LL Sea MAN Pes SANGRE, O.ANAAMEA, LOE ANAL 11H AHR CISARR FLED RMI, cr A A HEL. PU, RARE MAEM). SH RATE 1 Sameer ‘Gi FRLRNE HVA(GBIT 480-2010)" MILO TNO te, AE 80 Fig. Schematic diagram of Fischer Assay reation device Fistad Ay (20 too ft. 160-200 He 200 HEALS Tk AM RIiMERLTT ANE. 2 BR SHE DW “A SANA AOE ECHL FARM L(GBLT 480-2010) SURI SCIn ER. SANNA PRET STSIDL PAM AEA NE 5 A 84819) 8 EDIE 2] Micromertes ASAP2020 31-1 Sema AMAL ALAR ATER LATHE AMSLS, 7 ARAM APSE Vario ELL MCR DAT ALAPWT. S SH HARRI AN LABIA ZEPY KZDL-SB MRL FSI. 2.1 AS PIRLEBAI EAN AR EEN ISEB AY 80-120 F. 120-160 160-200 1181 200, HILL UTR RLM ge 510 C, FLOR 20 min FSR PE RAAT AMAR, AMOR ULE 1 a, 21 Ett Reni Tab.1_Erfots of particle size onthe tar yield MORO AWM We Kg ile “Ve PERM Tere EMP #0-120 2000042180 1614 120-160 2000 os 1921556 160-200 2000090 1901573 220 2000056188 15402 Weary sores Tat aka 791 3a 1st $606 832 saz 1478691 sn 497 14731 295 475 (Seok 1} PROS SE RE RR FRE CEL. NRO Ao ee 2014SKL-DEMOTS) eC] RHC, 8, WIE, BUERIT, EBRICIT RAMU. mABiNI a2016 4% 551130) 55 43-8 4855 325 Re ‘wwertdchem.com 47 HEC 1 WDE AEP. IAA ap E (fot PA OS A 120~160, £095 tec i co i oO A GoM LEO ALE ATE em, MR A (ARATE BREE, AUT a FAC CE et E PSE SSRAIMEIRREIR, IAS LW CSE RR I URAC eam LT — eT zs ANYERL, SCARE} 9M pS 1h RPE OR, Leo, RAT a Bee, SPamRL eA cen Ae ‘poeta PIny ARO, MCRL N RL TM cA, Te 2. EMER ALR] AR EE AA ATT. 22 SERA AS AHLIE AA oor oot 00 Fone Sons 5 0004 ‘| om ook? oo Poe Distr @ 10010 as fy ri 5 O53 40 eo 80100 12014 Tso Pore Diameter o a. ons Sons $ on] 000| © 030 a 6a 80100 13040 Pore Dieser © ) 457.19 80-120 11, 120-160 F1, 140-200 F200 FOL HEE AMAL EES 2 ORS A HEA Fig.2 Pore size distribution of raw coal and its semi-coke IR 2 BI, 80-120 FEL AE A MEAD AEE 3.8 um 2A, 120-160 FAR ALES 8 5A AE 3.9 nm A 89.25 nm Fe45» HAE EG, 160-200 1 AVIR EAL EE 884} 4748 66.70 nm A 96.88 nm #2 4 BH E200 FDL PB WRBEAL AB Ep 15 F 66.22 nm A194. 81 num i, AT EU AL 9: Af. 4.63 fm $4948 mm 55.28 wm 1639 wen AUAS2S mf 2 22 AMIEL AMER OA Tab2 Comparative pore diameter of before and after coal pyrolysis a 120 120-160 H 160-200 H S300 WHALE 30. 73.65 390. 8925 16.70. 9658 622, 947 M815 7Linm 54988 3524 7639 $525 BEB.Xonor #1FANCAL A209 BIST AINE ESN 1A — BP Dike, “ese MRALEE 2 a HLAL(DIO nm), 444,00 nm1000 am), 82 2 Hf, 80-120 F AUIRAEAL PEM: F MAL. 120-160 FLAIR MESH AL AL, AAT FLUUNGLIB JCP ER ALAN Fd. AN TEAL AAT LE EAA ROE ANAL > EH, ‘SCI FBT E075 RIT UT PM A a IE AMUN ST eA, SUREICETTL MECH. ERR SEa SLGEAY aR REIN NEE AR RIEHL SO 1G SUC, ABI DRE SSS AUIRRG Jc, AT AL ARH Vid. COSMET ALBA eA ICE — He REA RAT INEM, BLUR BER. RHA) AL A AG TA ABLE 23 ERUDITE IN a 23 SRST ETT Tab 3_Analysis of raw coal and thle semicoke elements SHO ne € H N 3 ° We Ne ae WGI) ESCO ONO 0763 —OOT 0.06 ‘Pfiqg0-120 A) RBG «353 0284s 27.0037 .m0304 0284 WgK¢120-160 7303 Rsk ase mmMe 0283 shc20-160 A) «752731960286 ad— OSS 0500 mm «0208 WmgHt6o-200H) 712810702906 mm® 0251 “Ffh(160-200 1) 75793) = os7 0363 oan 0am Iagk=200 H) 2437008620347 Oss as “et> 200) jos 3a __osi_i924__owss__anoios aso (FER 31 5)Pom eT worw-gdchem.com 31: 201646 310M 943 2 4858 325 9 22: mR % ” il 3s a fo i = =m @ 2 WAAL Ba see me Fig? Weighiless change of green peppers SBE MOPOLIF IE ERR IE SE OU AL, WIE eR AUP ALAR. BAL 2 OIE PARI ACME 168, JbR D HIGHTRAIL AHIR, . SIE A ALAC B i, CAMRY RRND. C2, HCC ARERR NOEL Tin Rem FOE 23Ve ia ae cel it ‘ 1 3 eeekey a He) BLS HEHE Ve MASE fete Fig Ve content Change of green peppers AAI 3 TITLES. PASELAPIA Vo NERVES Ae THe FROG. SATIN FSET PARRA EHR HE TUYERE IG T ARAL. OE Ve AORN: TUMEUR Bl AIMMAE IIE Ve MBAR ADE RE. A 3 oa, ALIRL D AUIFHGE) Vo TALIE FRENRERO it) C ALIEN) Ve fe UFR. ART STOR, WNL EAR BOE SERENA SIUC Aine AA I, AA AIEEE, Web Ve AULA. 24 fel TAL MOAR PONE HAR ETM AT LAR, AUNT ESS TRIMMED, ARR L. AARR ‘ HA 3 TL, MERRIE, Rel Ae JBLRURRER IE AM, SURAT URL ti CALS, NC EE ‘oe MLS Mee Osh, MEALS YN Sr CAA REE eS.) ARR eCAT, BL HS, i His JRF FOMEEAL, GERAD HS, AANA RRIRAT HHS, BEE, HSE Hs. es LEAN TH RRL BE A, Hee) HS 5 Hee. Ha Sts A MEY ets RAE VDLERe ARIAT A STOR REM, 120-160 3 MALIK ARLE EAC 2s ABS IA fe. 3 Hie SPAEMLAYRLERTE 120-160 FLEA AMARA. MAA ALLE Ania RAE, BDetebar ay, home, WS. RA ARAM In, Age ATER AE RETA. Falk. BEA SSMEARIE, THAR AMPA OEIC AT MR BER pM Hees. EL, 8 AR RTARYC REAR AAT ROH ET U1 BARERL 2015, 400), 450-456. 4 OTL lh. Se eA SEF. IC ILE RCA A, Re MERA T-min ‘HERI a AH i ae) al =u ey SE hs koa ee Alo Hs sree Hee Fig Acid content change of green peppers 3 Hie Se en ee AEA S's. 30s #1 1 mi, ALA EI T8](0~10 ) A ALC PS A. KM Ve AMM AMMT SIL, HOO, MRA TIAL, PENCIL T ANIL PENE IY AFB. DU, STERNAL amin ff) C 20 7E RIA HEE SFM PEACE, JO Ve A MRM TATLRE, ATURE TRIPLE BEI U)Aldee M. Chitosan appli for active bo-baved fms padtion sd Potential inthe fod industy: Review! LW-Food Science ad Tecnology 2010, 43: 837-842. IIR 2, IMMER, EAC, AERA TAREE. oak VME, 2014, 40(6. 147-181. RAL, RR. ACRONIS RAT HESTL. AEL M2011, 290) 9-1. (STERAPRED, AANA, 2007010) 218-220. [STARE (N2E, HARA, 9, TORN NARS. HH HETAFRPR, 2012. 25) 21-2, [oyAUNEE, LOLA IROEASEERT. HA ALFA 205, 2003-10710 Dye 2th, BDU, SRE, SKM GCE ER AP MBO]. AAWTTLISIEN, 2008, 3002). 157-159 (SAAR, eb ee, eRe MAHAR, 2002 26-28, DIKAIP. a srbideRION, dse, sPOERET MURAL, 2001. 118-116 CRSatimSt: ADL. HOTU, EITM. RRMA IER aa AGERE RO REIB LU). HILT, 2016, 43(11) 30-31) ey. AORN femIROEAIIID). RLESTILAL, 2014, 1049) 69-70. [SH fA mR MR RNA AEA REID). Wise FHA A 213, IS)-EtP, EaBIR. MB. SAPNA AC SCOR a FD). HRA, 201301), 99.101 [SHEARS ANE, Sco, ALEAMNENEALIEIY TOIT AKL. HF BAB ACEEM, 2011, 316) 659.62. (oqmRaLO, EAR. BRA, BALE, ALON EL). APDARHER, 2011, 170). 71-78. TUE, Sr, ME. eRe OMRIRAERIC). “HOLE 1 ARF RIRIR 100 MERLE KE, 2011. TSYRPNE, 3076, EM, °. SPI BRERA tp RI FONE], HIRAM, 2013, 3802). 294300 IDVRERT, (1AeMR, EAR, 9G. eM Nah IRR PANE EHS AUNH, ROEM]. AREER 2012. 400). 138-12. (LOA. Sena... GRAAL HS UE UL AEORLICR, 2010, 16(ay 44.48. CRRA, RD, Fi. REM, %. AMS HMPARL. PHM, 2016, 43(11): 46-47)