1. The document evaluates a training program for health program trainers in Indonesia using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model.
2. The evaluation found that the trainer and participant selection processes were appropriate, the curriculum and materials were well designed and implemented effectively, and the facilities and funding were sufficient.
3. The training program was concluded to be an effective way to help health programs in Indonesia achieve optimal results by ensuring trainers have both technical expertise and strong training skills.
1. The document evaluates a training program for health program trainers in Indonesia using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model.
2. The evaluation found that the trainer and participant selection processes were appropriate, the curriculum and materials were well designed and implemented effectively, and the facilities and funding were sufficient.
3. The training program was concluded to be an effective way to help health programs in Indonesia achieve optimal results by ensuring trainers have both technical expertise and strong training skills.
1. The document evaluates a training program for health program trainers in Indonesia using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model.
2. The evaluation found that the trainer and participant selection processes were appropriate, the curriculum and materials were well designed and implemented effectively, and the facilities and funding were sufficient.
3. The training program was concluded to be an effective way to help health programs in Indonesia achieve optimal results by ensuring trainers have both technical expertise and strong training skills.
Evaluation of The Input of The CIPP Stuflebeam Model for The Training
of Trainers for The National Health Indicator Investment Health Program
Fitriyanti, Evaluation of The Input of The CIPP Stuflebeam Model for The Training of Trainers for The National Health Indicator Investment Health Program First Forsiladi International Conference on Humanity, Science, and Technology in Multidimensional Science, January 28-29 2023
Results and Discussion Conclusion
Adage/Axiom Context evaluation also aims to assess whether existing goals and priorities are aligned with the needs of whoever is being served. Whatever the focus of the This study found 1. Participants met The results of this study found: 1. Participants met Improving the Education and Training evaluation object, the results of the context evaluation education and experience criteria, 2. Trainers education and experience criteria, 2. Trainers met Program for Health Program Trainers through must provide a solid basis for adjusting existing goals met qualification & competency standards, 3. Curriculum objectives: clarity of level of qualification & competency standards, 3. evaluating the input of the CIPP Stufle Beam and priorities and targeting the required changes Curriculum objectives: clarity of level of model is a national health indicator (Stufflebeam & Coryn, 2014); 2. Input Evaluation: The knowledge, skills, and attitudes were very good, Appropriateness of material with knowledge, skills, and attitudes were very good, investment. main orientation of input evaluation is to help explain training objectives, Good Outline of Learning Material suitability with training objectives, GBPP whether the program can bring about the required Introduction changes. Input evaluation identifies and assesses Process (GBPP), Program Structure: adequate was good, Program Structure: adequate proportion of theory and practice time, proportion of theory and practice time, The achievements of related unit programs relevant approaches, identifies barriers, constraints, and Appropriateness of methods with learning Conformity of methods with learning objectives, potentially available resources that are worth taking into have not been maximized, this is due to objectives, Training Aids by methods, Training Aids by methods, Evaluation of account in the process of program effectiveness); 3. several factors, including the supporting Evaluation of curriculum relevant to curriculum relevant to objectives; 4. Available Process Evaluation: Process evaluation is an assessment resources, one of the supporting resources is objectives; 4. Available print learning print learning materials are very good: The content of the implementation of the plans that have been human resources, namely trainers. To materials are very good: The content and prepared. One of the goals of process evaluation is to and sequence of printed materials are very good, improve health program outcomes, program sequence of printed materials are very good, provide feedback to managers and staff on the extent to the writing of printed materials is very good, and the writing of printed materials is very good, units should conduct program technical which the program is running on schedule, implemented and the physical quality of printed materials the physical quality of printed materials is very training and related program functional as planned, and using available resources efficiently; 4. good while audio-visual learning materials are is very good while audio-visual learning Product Evaluation: The purpose of product evaluation absent; 5. Good & very good facilities, enough case training where the trainers, apart from being materials are absent; 5. Good & very good is to measure, interpret, and assess program facilities, enough case banks; 6. Funding: banks; 6. Funding through APBN. proficient in substance, also have the achievements. The important thing in this evaluation APBN The TPPK training program is a breakthrough knowledge, skills, and training principles, component is the feedback on what was achieved during program, as a transformational tool for training and also have the appropriate criteria The TPPK training program is a the program cycle and on the conclusions. In addition, required for accreditation. The evaluation breakthrough program, as a participants so that the program units obtain product evaluations often have to be expanded to assess transformational tool for training optimal program achievements. To produce model used is Context, Input, Process, the long-term effects of the program being evaluated participants so that the program units obtain professional health program trainers, apart from Product from Stufflebeam optimal program achievements. To produce being proficient in technical substance, they must Methodology ; professional health program trainers, apart also master the knowledge, skills, and training This research is evaluation research with a principles as required. from being proficient in technical substance, qualitative descriptive approach using the CIPP they must also master the knowledge, skills, References The components in the CIPP evaluation model Stuflebeam design model. As for data collection and training principles as required. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). methods using interviews, document studies, can be explained as follows: 1. Context observations, and questionnaires with data Evaluation Theory Models & Aplication (Edition, Evaluation: The main objective of this type of collection tools, namely interview guidelines; S). San Farnsisco: Jossey-Bass. evaluation is to assess the overall status of the document study guidelines; checklist; list of object, identify deficiencies, and existing questionnaire statements using a Likert scale. Balai Besar Pelatihan Kesehatan Jakarta. strengths that can be used to correct these (2018). Laporan Pelatihan Tenaga Pelatih Program deficiencies and to diagnose existing problems. Kesehatan Tahun 2018. Jakarta: BPPK Jakarta.
(Geological Society of America Special Papers Volume 467) Georg Petersen G. - Mining and Metallurgy in Ancient Perú (GSA Special Paper 467) (2010, Geological Society of America) PDF