Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pranav Report DDS P-3 Cell
Pranav Report DDS P-3 Cell
INTERNSHIP REPORT
By
Pranavkumar S Dhanedhar
DEPARTMENT OF MANUFACTURING
ENGINEERING ENDURANCE TECHNOLOGIES PVT.
LTD. AURANGABAD
2022-23
1
P-3 CELL
CERTIFICATE
Netaji Pawar
Mfg. Dept.
2
P-3 CELL
Acknowledgement
PRANAVKUMAR DHANEDHAR
3
P-3 CELL
INDEX
Table Index
1 Operations Sequence 10
4
P-3 CELL
5
P-3 CELL
2. Introduction of Departments
6
P-3 CELL
3. Manufacturing Department
7
P-3 CELL
4. Problem Statement
Dent marks are observed on casting of P-3 cell i.e. CT 100 crankcase
casting. The castings are made of aluminium alloy material. Various processes
such as Milling, Drilling & Tapping, Bore finishing are performed on the casting
on CNC Milling machines. During this processes the face resting on the resting pad
is prone to dent marks. These dent marks on crankcase are undesirable as they may
later create a problem of oil leakage or oil starvation. Thus this increases the
rejection of the cell which in turn increases the revenue losses. Along with dent
damage, issue of handling damage also needs to be reduced.
5. Introduction
When machining brass, copper or aluminium alloys, it is noticed that the
part has dents when it was clamped during the CNC milling process. Dent marks
are the small indentions on the machining surface. Dent marks occur due to various
reasons such as high clamping pressure, remains of burr on fixture, ineffective
flushing by coolant, etc. Generally, it is observed that when burr remains on fixture
and new job is clamped on the fixture then due to the clamping force the burr
trapped between resting pad and resting face creates a dent mark on the resting face
of the casting. Dent marks on aluminium alloy die casting are smooth dents on
most of the thick surface of the die casting. This increase the rejection of material.
The root cause being the burr remaining on fixture or on the casting increases the
chances of dent mark. Thus, reducing the amount of burr remaining on fixture or
the casting can significantly reduce the chances of dent mark. This can be achieved
by regularly cleaning the fixture, considering all design attributes of fixture design
and effective flushing of the casting during the machining process which will
ensure that maximum burr is flushed out with the coolant. Fixture design attributes
such resting pads, dowel, supporting blocks design play important role. Hence to
reduce dent mark on casting, a complete root cause analysis is needed to be done.
This project consists of various studies which helped to identify contribution of
various factors in dent damage study.
8
P-3 CELL
VMC=11,
Rough Rough
HMC=2, Full Finish & R-Face
Boring Boring
Washing=1
Total=
14
Cell-A
↑ ↙ ←
M4022
M490 M489
OP30 RH & LH ← OP20 LH ← OP10 LH
Makino
63/hr 34/hr
↑ ↙ ←
Cell-B
M4023
M0474 M0486
OP30 RH & LH ← OP20 LH ← OP10 LH
Makino
1m42 2m26s 3m6s
s 36/hr 34/h
70/hr r
Final
→ Washing → Gauging → Inspection
9
P-3 CELL
10
P-3 CELL
OP-20
R.H L.H
HSSE Roll Tap M8*1.25 6H SH8 SQ6.2 OL90 SC Drill D5.48*D55FL*110 OAL
OP-30 OP-40
D100 Milling Cutter PCD Reamer D36*22SL/D41*110 OAL SHK D20
PSSC Drill D7.35*25SL*D9*40FL*100 D52 P6 Remax Head
NTC
PCD Reamer D10H8 SH10 OAL95 PCD Reamer D8*15 BLA LEN*35FL*80
HSSE Roll Tap M8*1025 6H SH8 SQ6.2 D4 Identification Drill
OL90
SC Drill D5.48*D55FL*110 OAL HSSE PCD Reamer D16H8 * 180 OAL Shank DAH81
Roll Tap M6*1P 6H SH6 SQ4.9 OL80
D12 CHFR Tool PCD Reamer D13*D32*D40
- D52 H7 Remax Head
- PCD Reamer D28 P6* 40FL *OAL100*SH20
- PCD Reamer D8*14/D13*16/D22*OAL
125SHD20
- PCD Reamer D13*D24*D32*D40
- PCD Reamer D108.0H8*5.5SL*150 *96OAL Z4
- Reamer PCD D10 H8 FL15 SH D12-OAL 100
Table 2.3. OP-30 & OP-40 Tool Specs.
11
P-3 CELL
3
1 2 1 2
4
A 4
A
3
B B
C
C
D D
1 2 3
4 1 2 3 4
A
E
B
F
G
C
D H
Fig 2.3. LH Q- Face Fig 2.4. RH Q- Face
12
P-3 CELL
13
P-3 CELL
E1 - - - - - -
E2 - - - - - -
E3 - - - - - -
E4 - - - -
F1 - - - - - -
F2 - - - - - -
F3 - - - - - -
F4 - - - - - -
G1 1 - - - - 1
G2 - - - - - -
G3 - - - - - -
G4 - - - - - -
H1 - - - - - -
H2 - - - - - -
H3 - - - - - -
H4 - - - - - -
TOTAL 1 1 1 1 -
Table 3.2. Operation wise Dent Mark B-Cell (RH)
14
P-3 CELL
E1 - - - - - - -
E2 - - - - - - -
E3 - - - - - - -
E4 1 - - - - 1
F1 - - - - - 1 1
F2 - - - - - - -
F3 - - - - - - -
F4 - - - - - 1 1
G1 - - - - - - -
G2 - - - - - - -
G3 - - - - - - -
G4 - - - - - - -
H1 - - - - - - -
H2 - - - - - - -
H3 - - - - - - -
H4 - - - - - - -
TOTAL 1 2 2 4 - 2 11
Table 3.3. Operation wise Dent Mark A-Cell (LH)
15
P-3 CELL
E1 - - - - - -
E2 - - - - - -
E3 - - - - - -
E4 - - - - - -
F1 - - - - - -
F2 - - - - - -
F3 - - - - - -
F4 - - - - - -
G1 - - - - - -
G2 - - - - - -
G3 - - - - - -
G4 - - - - - -
H1 - - - - - -
H2 1 - - - - 1
H3 - - - - - -
H4 - - - - - -
TOTAL 1 1 1 2 - 5
Table 3.4. Operation wise Dent Mark B-Cell (LH)
16
P-3 CELL
17
P-3 CELL
E1 - 15 - - - -
E2 - 22 - - - -
E3 - - - - - -
E4 - - - - - -
F1 - - - - - -
F2 - - - - - -
F3 - - - - - -
F4 - - - - - -
G1 - - - - - -
G2 - - - - - -
G3 - - - - - -
G4 - - - - - -
H1 - - - - - -
H2 - - - - - -
H3 - 25 - - - -
H4 - - - - - -
TOTAL 43 62 0 0 0 0
18
P-3 CELL
19
P-3 CELL
9. ANALYSIS
A set of processes were followed in order to complete the Dent Mark Study.
This included dent mark position identifying, which helped to find the major
contributing operation. Then burr trapping study was conducted to identify
the locations at which burr/chips were remaining after each operation.
Followed by this clamping and resting locations were traced. It was found
that the location’s at which burr was trapping, dent marks generally occurred
at the same milling face locations. This included various drill holes and
dowel holes near the clamping and resting pad locations.
Based on daily inspection data, the dent damage daily trend was
observed. This included data from 17th March to 30th April. The results
came out are summarized below.
12.00
11.08
10.00 9.58
8.76
8.418.42
8.02
8.00 7.67
7.10
6.656.68
6.06
6.00 5.51
5.21 4.94
4.69 4.42 4.25
4.734.78 4.56
4.14
3.77 3.81
4.00 3.56 3.53
3.07 3.23
3.00
2.71
2.83 2.74
2.20 2.33
1.91
2.00
1.10
Percentage
20