The line graph shows the number of participants in 4 sports from 1985-2005 in a region. It shows that basketball and badminton had the lowest participation which remained steady, while tennis increased significantly and rugby declined. The graph also depicts tennis participation surpassing rugby after 10 years and increasing slightly from 1995-2005 to peak at 220 players, while rugby fell sharply to 50 players in 2005, equal to badminton.
The line graph shows the number of participants in 4 sports from 1985-2005 in a region. It shows that basketball and badminton had the lowest participation which remained steady, while tennis increased significantly and rugby declined. The graph also depicts tennis participation surpassing rugby after 10 years and increasing slightly from 1995-2005 to peak at 220 players, while rugby fell sharply to 50 players in 2005, equal to badminton.
The line graph shows the number of participants in 4 sports from 1985-2005 in a region. It shows that basketball and badminton had the lowest participation which remained steady, while tennis increased significantly and rugby declined. The graph also depicts tennis participation surpassing rugby after 10 years and increasing slightly from 1995-2005 to peak at 220 players, while rugby fell sharply to 50 players in 2005, equal to badminton.
The line graph shows the number of participants in 4 sports from 1985-2005 in a region. It shows that basketball and badminton had the lowest participation which remained steady, while tennis increased significantly and rugby declined. The graph also depicts tennis participation surpassing rugby after 10 years and increasing slightly from 1995-2005 to peak at 220 players, while rugby fell sharply to 50 players in 2005, equal to badminton.
The line graph depicts the number of people participating in 4 types of
sports in a particular region during the years 1985-2005. Overall, it is
evident that the number of basketball and badminton players was the lowest and remained steady over 20 years. Meanwhile, tennis witnessed a significant increase in participation, while rugby experienced a decline. Upon closer examination of the line graph, we can observe that although Rugby was the most popular sport, with tennis far behind in terms of player numbers, the gap between them was narrowing continuously and after the first 10 years, they crossed paths at 200 players. Moreover, between 1995 and 2005, there was a slight increase in tennis and it peaked at roughly 220 players in 2005. Turning to Rugby, it is obvious that it went into free-fall in the last 10 years, hitting a low of 50 in 2005, equal to the figure for badminton in the same years. In the case of basketball and badminton, they remained consistently at approximately 80 and 50 participants consecutively.