Two-Way ANOVA with Interaction Approach to Compare Content
Creation Speed Performance in Knowledge Management System
INTRODUCTION
PROBLEM DESCRIPTION
Knowledge management includes the collection,
analysis, dissemination, and general management of
all information that is possessed by an organization.
Bina Nusantara (BINUS) University states that a Good
speed performance is one of the key requirements in
content creation process on the Knowledge
Management System. This study examines the speed
performance of content creation in four different
modules: Documents, Video, Material, and
Binuspedia, as well as in 3 different campuses:
Anggrek Campus, Syahdan Campus and Alam
Sutera Campus.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this research is tol. compare the
speed performance of KMS at BINUS University with
module and campus factors using Two-way ANOVA
with interaction method, then the result can be used
by management to improve the university’s
Knowledge Management System.
TWO-WAY ANOVA MODEL
We use Two-way ANOVA because we want to know
whether there is any difference with a few
independent variables and the dependent variable
of each variable has two or more degree level. The
aim of the two-way ANOVA test is to determine the
influence of various criteria tested against the
desired result.
HYPOTHESES
H0: μ1 = μ2 = μ3
H1: Not all means are equal.
H0 is all treatments (variable, group, and
iteration) which have average of the same value.
H1 is if there is a treatment (variable, group, and
iteration) which has a different average-value.
Mariana Payan 33720, Diana Olguin 32410 & Leonardo Martinez 33735.
RESEARCH
DATA COLLECTION
The content creation process was
conducted at all campus locations using
the same laptop model so there was no
difference in device specification:
Notebook HP series 440, Intel(R)
Core(TM) i5-5200U CPU.
Afterwards, there was a conducted
upload process of a multimedia file. It
was a movie with .mp4 extension in HD
resolution with frame size 1280x720 and
the duration was 1 minute 57 seconds.
This file was uploaded 5 times for all
modules in all three different campus
locations. The speed performance was
measured using a stopwatch.
ANALYSIS
CONCLUSION
RESULTS
1. Campus factor has F value of 0.80 and F table value
is 3.19. F value < F table. Campus factor accepts null
hypothesis (H0) and rejects alternative hypothesis (H1),
all means are equal.
2. Module factor has F value of 55.15 and F table value
is 2.80. F value > F table. Module factor accepts
alternative hypothesis (H1) and reject null hypothesis
(H0), not all means are equal.
3. Interaction factor has F value of 1.96 and F table
value is 2.29. F value < F table. Interaction factor
accepts null hypothesis (H0) and reject alternative
hypothesis (H1), all means are equal.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The speed performance on content creation for
each campus is equal.
2. The speed performance on content creation for
each KMS modules are not all equal.
3. The speed performance on content creation for
interaction factor are equal.
RECOMMENDATIONS
As the speed performance on content creation for
each KMS modules are not all equal, we recommend
to locate the module with the fastest speed and
prioritize to create more content in that one, either
documents, video, material or binuspedia.
REFERENCES
1Iskandar, K., Noprianto, Abbas, B. S., Soewito, B., & Kosala, R. (2016).
Two-Way ANOVA with interaction approach to compare content
creation speed performance in knowledge management system. 2016
11th International Conference on Knowledge, Information and Creativity
Support Systems (KICSS). https://doi.org/10.1109/kicss.2016.7951453
Montgomery, D. C. (2020). Design and Analysis of Experiments (10th
ed.). Wiley.
What is a knowledge Management System? (2022). KPS.
https://www.kpsol.com/what-is-a-knowledge-management-system
Wallstreetmojo Editorial Team. (2022, May 17). Two-Way ANOVA.
WallStreetMojo. https://www.wallstreetmojo.com/two-way-anova