Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Creep - DRB
Creep - DRB
RICARDO BAPTISTA
Creep
Elastic and plastic strains are commonly idealized as appearing instantly
upon the application of stress
Further deformation that occurs gradually with time is called creep
strain
◦ Steam turbines in power plants
◦ Jet and rocket engines
◦ Nuclear reactors
◦ Failure of lightbulb filaments
◦ Gradual loosening of plastic eyeglass frames
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 2
Creep Testing
The most common method
of creep testing is simply to
apply a constant axial force,
either in tension or
compression, to a bar or
cylinder of the material of
interest.
Since the force is to be held
constant for long periods of
time, simple dead weights
and a lever system may be
used.
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 3
Strain versus time behavior
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 4
Strain versus time behavior
There is an initial nearly instantaneous occurrence of elastic and
perhaps also plastic strain, followed by the gradual accumulation of
creep strain. The strain rate, ε˙ = dε/dt, hence the slope of the ε versus t
plot, is at first relatively high.
However, ε˙ decreases and often becomes approximately constant, at
which point the primary or transient stage of creep is said to end, and
the secondary or steady-state stage to begin.
At the end of the secondary stage, ε˙ increases in an unstable manner as
rupture failure approaches, with this portion being called the tertiary
stage. In this final stage, the deformation becomes localized by the
formation of a neck as in a tension test, or voids may form inside the
material, or both may occur.
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 5
Strain versus time behavior
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 6
Stress versus steady-state
strain rate
Creep at
different
temperatures
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 7
Stress versus rupture life
curves
Creep at
different
temperatures
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 8
Ti-6Al-2Sn-2Zr-2Cr-2Mo-0.16Si
(Ti-6-22-22S) behavior
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 9
Material Model
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 10
Material Model
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 11
In practice
Fios com 3.15 mm de diâmetro e 254 mm de
comprimento foram ensaiados à fluência…
0.07
0.06
0.05
Strain (mm/mm)
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (min)
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 12
In practice
0.08 1
1 10 100
0.07
y = 0.0032x + 0.0022
0.06 0.1
0.05
0.04
dε/dt
0.01
0.03 y = 0.0015x + 0.0019
y = 2E-05x2.1761
0.02
y = 0.0007x + 0.001 0.001
0.01
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
0.0001
σ (Mpa)
5.71 8.56 11.42
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 13
Deformation
Mechanism
Maps
RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 5/24/2022 14
Deformation Mechanism Maps
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 15
In practice
Consider nickel with the same grain size. This material is subjected to a
tensile stress of 6 MPa at a temperature of 900◦C. What is the
approximate strain rate, and what creep mechanism is dominant?
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 16
Larson-Miller Parameter
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 17
Larson-Miller Parameter
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 18
Larson-Miller Parameter
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 19
In practice
The Cr-Mo-V steel is used in an application where the applied stress is 400 MPa. The
planned actual service life is 20,000 hours, and a safety factor of 1.5 on stress is
required.
(a) What is the highest permissible operating temperature?
(b) What safety factor on life is achieved by using the factor of 1.5 on stress?
(c) What safety margin in temperature corresponds to the factor of 1.5 on stress?
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 20
In practice
a) 𝑇 log 20 000 + 22 = 128200 − 141500 log 600 +
64380 log 600 2 − 9960 log 600 3
𝑇 = 700°𝐾
b) 𝑇 = 700°𝐾, 𝜎 = 400𝑀𝑃𝑎 -> 𝑡 = 15 530 773ℎ
c) 𝜎 = 400𝑀𝑃𝑎, 𝑡 = 20 000ℎ -> 𝑇 = 777°𝐾
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 21
Ti-6Al-2Sn-2Zr-2Cr-2Mo-0.16Si
(Ti-6-22-22S) behavior
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 29
Stress Relaxation
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 30
Stress Relaxation
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 31
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.06.002
In practice
Different types of polyethylene used in this study
(a) ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene
(UHMWPE) GUR 1020 blended with vitamin E, (b)
UHMWPE GUR 1020, (c) Vitamin E-blended cross-
linked polyethylene (XLPE) GUR 1020 (75 kGy
gamma radiation), and (d) XLPE GUR 1020
(75 kGy gamma radiation, remelted)
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 32
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.09.025
In practice
Superior view of the knee demonstrating the
transition from the attachment to the meniscus
and the bone insertion site. The collagen fiber
orientation of the attachment is also visible.
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 33
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.08.021
In practice
Composed of a compliant polycarbonate-
urethane (PCU) matrix which is reinforced
circumferentially with high modulus ultrahigh
molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibers
(a) Representative creep response of specimens from the static soaking test from a virgin implant (●) and an implant soaked in
simulated physiological fluid (SPF) for 6 months (●). (b) Representative creep response of specimens from the dynamic soaking
test from an implant which was pre-soaked for two weeks (●) and an implant which underwent 2 million load cycles in SPF (●)
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 34
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.08.021
In practice
(a) Stress relaxation responses of specimens from the static soaking test
from a virgin implant (●) and an implant soaked in simulated physiological
fluid (SPF) for 6 months (●). (b) Representative stress relaxation responses
of specimens from the dynamic soaking test from an implant which was
pre-soaked for two weeks (●) and an implant which underwent 2 million
load cycles in SPF (●)
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 35
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compsci
tech.2005.11.016
polysulphone–hydroxyapatite
poly(lactide-co-glicolide)–hydroxyapatite
24/05/2022 RICARDO.BAPTISTA@ESTSETUBAL.IPS.PT 36