Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

COMMISSIONONAUDITMEMORANDUMNO.

2001003
January31,2001
TO : Directors,LocalGovernmentAuditOfficeandCOARegional Offices,Provincial,CityandMunicipalAuditorsandAllOthers Concerned

SUBJECT: RevokingCOAMemorandumNo.2000063datedMay25,2000
InordertoclarifyandmaintainthepositionoftheCommissiononthematterofprocurementofpensionandother insuranceplansforbarangayofficials,COAMemorandumNo.200063issuedonMay25,2000coveringthe subjectofpensionplansforbarangayofficialsprovidedbyprivateinsurancecompanies,isherebyrevoked.COA DecisionNo.98457datedDecember3,1998,LegalOfficeMemorandadatedNovember12,1999and September2,1999,COAOpinionNo.2000001datedJanuary3,2000,andCOAOpinionNo.97002,dated January15,1997,allofwhichupheldthevalidityofinsurancecoverageofbarangayofficials,remaintheofficial pronouncementofthisCommissiononthematter. Insummary,thefollowingarethegistoftheabovedecision/opinions: COADecisionNo.98457andOpinionNo.97002 Whatthelawrequiresinrespecttothepossibleinsurancecoveragewithaprivateinsurancecompanyisto subjectthesametoaresolutiondulypassedandapprovedbythesanggunianconcernedshouldfinancesofthe municipal/citygovernmentallowsaidcoverage,providedthatsuchinsurancecoverageshallbegovernedbythe provisionofSection522,R.A.7160. LegalOfficeMemorandadatedNovember12,1999andSeptember2,1999 NotwithstandingtheopinionadvancedbytheGSISGeneralCounsel,thisOfficeaffirmstheviewthatpension planbenefitscanbeextendedtobarangayofficials.AcarefulreadingoftheContecaseshowsthatthe prohibitionrefersonlytogovernmentofficersandemployeeswhoarequalifiedforretirementinsurancecoverage bytheGSIS.Thelimitedtermofofficeofbarangayofficialswouldnotqualifythemforpensionorretirement benefitswhichispreciselywhyRA6942limitedthebenefitsavailabletothemtoonlyfourdeath,burial, accidentanddisabilitybenefits. Furthermore,theGSISLawisthegenerallawwithrespecttoinsuranceofpublicofficers,whereasSections447 and458oftheLocalGovernmentCodearethespecialprovisionsgoverninglocalofficials,andtheruleincaseof conflictisthatspeciallawprevailsovergenerallaw.Thefact,however,isthatthereisnoconflictbetweenthe twostatutesfortheycanbeperfectlyharmonizedsincetheLocalGovernmentCodecanbeviewedasfillingthe vacuumintheGSISLawasregardspensionorretirementlawsoflocalelectiveofficials. COAOpinion2000001 Paymentbythegovernmentforsuchinsurancecoverageshallonlybeforthedurationofthebarangayofficers termofoffice.Shouldsaidbarangayofficialsormemberswouldstillwanttocontinueavailmentofthebenefit evenaftertheirtermsofoffice,premiumspaymentsthereforshouldalreadycomefromtheirpersonalfunds. Thus,permanentinsurancecoveragewherethebarangaywillshoulderpaymentofthepremiumsaftertheirterm ofofficewillnotbefeasible. Forinformationandguidanceinaudit.

(Sgd.)CELSOD.GAGAN Chairman

You might also like