Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evolution of Insulation Piercing Connector Technology
Evolution of Insulation Piercing Connector Technology
Evolution of Insulation Piercing Connector Technology
G. Porcheray
Tyco Electronics / Energy Division
SIMEL
Gevrey-Chambertin, FRANCE
I. INTRODUCTION
When the first insulated conductors appeared in the 2 – In order to avoid insulation stripping, EdF spent
1950’s, the insulation layer was rubber (neoprene) two years investigating insulation piercing
and the conductor was copper. The connectors were technology. Every 2 or 3 months, EdF went to the
not reinsulated and mechanical bolted connectors site with the connector supplier and carried out
were the most common items. Soon utilities resistance measurements. Finally, the piercing
discovered that conductors with insulation were technology was born in the 1970’s at the same time
safe for linemen and customers, however the as in other European countries (Germany).
insulation material was not resistant enough to
climatic conditions (neoprene deteriorated) and 3 – In addition to the above, insulation piercing
failures appeared due to the poor quality of the technology brought an additional safety factor to
insulation. In the 1960’s, EdF (Electricité de live line work with no need for wire stripping and
France), changed to PVC insulation and aluminium an easy and quick connection procedure.
conductors. Although the insulation problems
seemed to be solved, connector failures appeared III. SUCCESSIVE TECHNOLOGY
due to the aluminium oxide layer formed from STEPS
exposure to the air and the knife stripping process.
This operation damaged the strands and started the The insulation piercing technology passed three
wire necking process and was amplified by the main steps:
vibration of the conductor. During this time,
crimped connectors were used with heat shrinkable Step 1: 1970’s
cable accessories but it became apparent that PVC The connector had two separate bolts: one for the
was not resistant to the temperature variations and main and one for the tap. Insulation piercing
cracked due to the tensile load on the neutral occurred on the main cable only and the service line
messenger. was stripped. Bolts were in direct electrical contact
with the conductor and the insulation was a rigid
In order to eliminate the inconveniences above, cover since no water resistance was required. The
EdF, in association with Aluminium Pechiney contact area was in aluminium alloy.
connector manufacturers, investigated three main
issues: Disadvantages :
1) Find a more resistant insulation layer - Risk of failure of service connection due to the
stripping operation, mainly for small sizes and
2) Improve contact reliability solid conductors.
- Risk of accident due to the energized bolt
3) Connect customers under voltage and in safe during live line installation.
conditions. - Corrosion between the aluminium body and the
copper service conductor.
- Too much torque on the bolt would damage the
II. BASIC DESIGN wires.
- Too little torque would not fully pierce the
1 – XLPE cross linked polyethylene was chosen in insulation.
1977 and is now the most well known insulation - Breaking of the rigid cover under cold
material used in LV insulated overhead lines due to conditions.
its high environmental and mechanical resistance.
Disadvantages :
Step 3: 1990’s
Independent tightening Advantages
The connector had 2 bolts: one for the main and one
for the tap. Insulation piercing occurred either on - Avoid water entry into the cable
the main and tap or only on the main. The bolt was - Easy penetration of the cable insulation
insulated and equipped with a shear head device.
The connectors were fully insulated and water Disadvantages
resistant. The contact blades were made from an
aluminium alloy, brass, or copper that was plain or - Expensive manufacturing process.
tinned.
Knife concept extruded from an aluminium alloy
profile
Simultaneous tightening
The connector had one bolt with simultaneous
tightening on the main and tap. The bolt was
insulated and designed with a shear head device.
The connectors were fully insulated and water
resistant due to the sealing parts filled with grease.
The contact blades were made from aluminium
alloy, brass, or copper that was plain or tinned.
This new generation design covered all the main
customer requirements and complied with safety
requirements.
- Easier to manufacture
Step 1 :
Disadvantages
In the 1970’s, the cover was a rigid plastic box and
- Cuts the insulation like a knife and allows provided protection for linemen against direct
moisture ingress when installed at cold contact.
temperature.
- Cuts cable conductor if torque is not
controlled.
- Higher torque needed to penetrate the cable
insulation.
Step 2 :
Advantages :
- Simple to install
Advantages : Disadvantages :
Contact blades + sealing parts Cover was flexible and fit better around the
Contact blades as above, but inserted in a watertight conductors due to the pressure of the rigid plastic
sealing body filled with grease. fasteners.
Step 2:
Bolt made from protected steel or from aluminium
alloy with hexagonal head 10 or 13 mm with shear
head option.
Advantages :
- Torque control.
Disadvantages :
Advantage:
- One-piece construction. - Specific and expensive design.
- Better integration of the connector into the bundle - Direct contact with energized parts.
Disadvantages : Step 3:
Standard 8mm or 10mm bolts hot dip galvanised,
- No specific seal to avoid water penetration zinc plating (dacromet process) or stainless steel,
- Risk of corrosion supplied with a plastic or metallic shear head
- Aluminium blades were required for device.
aluminium conductors and copper blades for
copper conductors Advantages :
Disadvantages :
V. TECHNOLOGY UPDATE
At the beginning of the piercing technology, To meet this criteria, key factors are the choice of
designers extrapolated data from their experience the bolt, the applied torque, and the contact area.
on the bare conductor connection, mainly based on Different bolt material and protection may require a
parallel groove technology. Taking the same different torque for the same application.
contact area ratio, piercing area was large and
consequently the torque needed to penetrate the Influence of bolt material on torque is shown as
insulation was large and not reliably produced by a follows:
lineman in the field. The main difference between
parallel groove clamps (PG) and insulation piercing
connectors (IPC) is that PG clamps are not
protected against corrosion before installation. This
caused designers to design a wide contact area and
a high pressure to obtain a proper contact resistance
and current flow. One of the main advantages of
the piercing technology is that the aluminium is not
oxidized before installation. The mating contact
surface with the connector doesn’t need to be
cleaned prior to installation. Therefore, due to a
high contact pressure and to an excellent
partitioning of the contact point along the cable
wiring, Insulation Piercing Technology appeared as
a major innovation in terms of current carrying
capability.
The curve shows that a controlled torque must be
Contact point Partition applied in order to secure the contact performance.
Major wires shown
Radial partition
Resistance (ohm)
cables cables
2
> 95mm2 Š 25 mm
mini
Torque (N.m)
C. Relaxation effect
Résistances en
225,0µΩ
Torque (N.m) Référence câble Raccord 1 R1 Raccord 2 R2 Raccord 3 R3 Raccord 4 R4 Raccord 5 R5 Raccord 6 R6
120°C
110°C
100°C
90°C
températures en °C
80°C
70°C
60°C
50°C
40°C
30°C
20°C
10°C
0 10 20 30 40 50 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200
Nb.cycles
TC ref TC 1 TC 2 TC 3 TC 4 TC 5 TC 6
TC 7 TC 8 TC 9 TC 10 TC 11 TC 12 TC ambiante
Electrical resistances and temperatures shall In addition, and in order to check the long life
demonstrate a good stability during the test. performance, EdF required a climatic aging test
Requirements for stability are defined in which consists of 6 weeks exposure (as per the
corresponding standards. In France heat cycle tests table), including humidity, temperature variations,
are carried out in accordance with NF C 33-004. ultra violet exposure, and sprinkling conditions.
Here is a typical resistance measurement between This test is defined in the French standard NFC 20-
cycle 0 and 200 cycles. 540.
This is the more common application where The author would like to thank all of his colleagues
connections are submitted to climatic exposure and who helped in design and testing of the described
linemen face installation difficulties. This is also a products, Mr André Dupont for his special
safe technology which avoids wire stripping and contributions in the design and Mr Pierre
allows the connectors to be installed energized. Deschamps for his contribution in organizing the
test program.
B – Tap connection in LV underground cables
XI. REFERENCES
This technology is used as tap connection between
a main line and another main line. In this case 1) Brian W. Callen, AMP, “Load relaxation in
connectors are installed on the cables into a box Insulation Piercing Connectors” 1998
which has to be filled with resin or gel. Direct 2) Electrical ageing test of connectors used on
burial is the next step currently under development. overhead (OH) aerial bundled conductors
(ABC).
Europe, Asia and Latin Americas are now more CIRED 97 Conference Publication N° 438
familiar with this technology. EDF DER GECC : T. Le Corre
SIMEL : P. Deschamps
VIII. CONCLUSION MALICO : D. Falliex
GIMELEC : C. Daviet
These requirements of long term electrical and 3) R.S. Timsit, AMP “High performance
mechanical performance required a new design connectors in Power Distribution Systems”.
approach. Engineers faced three major problems: