Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GGGI 21july
GGGI 21july
GGGI 21july
Contents
Background ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2
1) GGGI’s Mission and Approach ........................................................................................................................... 2
2) Project Background and Objectives ..................................................................................................................................... 2
Proposed Activities and Scope of Work............................................................................................................................................. 2
1) Proposed Activities for the Overall Project........................................................................................................................ 2
2) Scope of Work for each Second Party Opinion ............................................................................................................... 3
Deliverables and Payment Schedule ................................................................................................................................................... 5
Reporting Arrangements ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6
1) Reporting Arrangements .......................................................................................................................................................... 6
Suggested Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6
Competence Requirements and Allocation ...................................................................................................................................... 6
Environmental and Social Considerations ......................................................................................................................................... 7
Anti-fraud ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8
Evaluation Criteria and Method ............................................................................................................................................................ 8
1) Evaluation of Technical Component .................................................................................................................................... 9
2) Evaluation of Financial Component................................................................................................................................... 10
3) Evaluation of Financial Soundness ..................................................................................................................................... 10
4) Evaluation of Technical and Financial components for total scoring ................................................................... 11
Annex A-I. Terms of Reference
Background
1) GGGI’s Mission and Approach
The Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI) was established as an intergovernmental
organization with the objective of promoting sustainable development of developing and
emerging countries including the least developed countries. GGGI is dedicated to
supporting the creation and diffusion of the model of economic growth known as “green
growth”. The green growth model integrates economic growth, environmental
sustainability, poverty reduction and social inclusion.
Thematic bonds play a key role in financing the transition to a resilient low-carbon society.
To promote the development of the regional thematic bond markets, GGGI will
collaborate with prospective issuers (sovereign/sub-sovereign governments,
public/private sector institutions who are eligible to issue bonds) from LAC, Africa and
Asia to facilitate thematic bond issuances in domestic and international markets. GGGI
technical assistance includes the development of Thematic Bond Framework defining
issuers:
- Use of Proceeds
- Process for projects identification and selection
- Process for management of proceeds
- Monitoring and reporting commitments
3
Annex A-I. Terms of Reference
For each of the SPOs, the general assignment activities the service provider shall deliver
shall include the following Deliverables:
a. Deliverable 1: Draft Second Party Opinion in English
b. Deliverable 2: Final Second Party Opinion in English
c. Deliverable 3: Translation of the Second Party opinion to regional language (if needed)
For the sake of this assignment, Thematic Bond may refer to Green, Social or
Sustainability or Sustainability-linked bond labels, as defined by ICMA’s Principles
and Guidelines, with up to 12 Eligibility Criteria.
The successful service provider shall deliver its Working plan based on the tentative
version presented below.
• The service provider shall produce a Draft Second Party Opinion based on
the issuer’s Thematic Bond Framework, relevant strategies and systems, and
interviews with relevant business units involved in the pre- and/or post-
issuance process.
The structure of the Draft Second Party Opinion should be aligned with market standards
and international best practices1 and include the following information:
1
For more reference, refer to: https://www.icmagroup.org/sustainable-finance/the-principles-guidelines-
and-handbooks/
4
Annex A-I. Terms of Reference
The Service Provider’s technical and financial proposal shall consider at least 3 rounds of
reviews and comments during a period of 3 weeks for each SPO, to allow sufficient time
for GGGI and the issuer to update, integrate and respond to feedbacks.
• Based on the successful review of the Draft Second Party Opinion, the service
provider shall complete ICMA’s External Review Form, submit it to the
ICMA’s secretariat and produce the Final Second Party Opinion following the
same structure described above.
Target: Completed ICMA’s External Review Form, submit it to the ICMA’s secretariat
and produce the Final Second Party Opinion
5
Annex A-I. Terms of Reference
Deliverable: Translated Second Party Opinion from English to regional language (if needed)
The service provider is expected to deliver around ten (10) Second Party Opinions in total in
the next 3 years.
As a result of this RFP, GGGI plans to award maximum two Framework Agreement (FWA) with the
selected organizations. While FWA shall not guarantee any actual or estimated volume of services,
Sub-Order (SO) to be issued later shall make a financial commitment. Each FWA contractor shall
receive at least three SO during the entire duration of FWA including the extension. GGGI has the
discretion of awarding additional SOs depending on the performance of the FWA contractor on the
Sub-Order issued.
GGGI anticipates that the FWA will be effective starting September 2023. The Framework
Agreements may be signed for up to three years; first year with 1 year duration with an option of
extension for 1 year x 2 based on satisfactory performance of the Service Provider. The price
submitted by the successful bidder during the RFP shall be valid for 1 year under the initial duration
of FWA: when GGGI exercise the option for extension into the 2nd year, the successful bidder may
either confirm the same price or can increase the unit prices with a reasonable explanation of the
price increase within 5%.
Each Second Party Opinion shall be delivered within 9 weeks from issuance of a
Suborder and submission of the Thematic Bond Framework to the service provider.
* Payments will be made per each SPO once all the deliverables indicated in the table
above are completed.
All reports and outputs shall be in English, in accordance with GGGI’s formatting
requirements, and submitted in hard copy and electronic formats along with complete
sets of raw data, research materials, and interview notes.
Reporting Arrangements
1) Reporting Arrangements
The service provider’s work progress will be monitored through weekly meetings, the
precise schedule of which is to be determined based on consultation with the Service
Provider.
The coordination for the execution of the consultancy will be led by GGGI Program
Manager.
Suggested Methodology
Bidders should suggest a methodology explaining how the work will be structured and
managed. The methodology should follow ICMA’s methodology.
For the sake of this assignment, Thematic Bond may refer to Green, Social or
Sustainability, Sustainability-Linked bond labels, as defined by ICMA’s Principles
and Guidelines, with up to 12 Eligible Criteria.
7
Annex A-I. Terms of Reference
− Prior experience delivering Second Party Opinions aligned with ICMA’s principles
and guidelines in LAC, Africa and Asia;
The service provider shall propose a team of minimum 8 experts with skills and qualifications as
follows:
GGGI as an institution abides by its project-level Sustainability and Safeguards Rules (SSR)
for all projects aligned with international standards for Environmental and Social
Safeguards. The SSR is aligned with commonly recognized international standards for
Environmental and Social Safeguards (ESS), i.e., the WB Performance Standard, that ensure
project level safeguarding of communities and people impacted by GGGI activities. GGGI
has integrated project level Environmental and Social Safeguards into its Project Cycle
Management (PCM) with mandatory Preliminary Gender and Social Assessments and ESS
Screening of all projects to identify and manage risks.
In addition, GGGI’s Gender Equality and Social Inclusion Strategy 2021-2025 provides a
framework toward achieving the principle of “Leaving No One Behind” in the
transformation towards green growth, guiding GGGI's approaches to the mainstreaming
of gender equality and poverty reduction. This also includes the implementation of the
GGGI Gender Equality and Poverty Reduction Policy Markers on all projects.
8
Annex A-I. Terms of Reference
GGGI’s Child Protection Rules and GGGI Rules on Sexual Exploitation ensure safeguarding
of children impacted by GGGI activities or in contact with GGGI contracted personnel, with
GGGI taking a zero-tolerance approach to child exploitation. GGGI is committed to child
protection, irrespective of whether any specific area of work involves direct contact with
children. GGGI’s Child Protection Policy is written in accordance with the Convention on
the Rights of the Child. All procedures mentioned above are accompanied by guidelines
and capacity building efforts. GGGI also provides a work environment that reflects the
values of gender equality, teamwork, embracing diversity in all its forms, integrity and a
healthy balance of work and life. We are committed to maintaining our balanced gender
distribution and therefore encourage women to apply. GGGI promotes equal
opportunities for all, including persons with disabilities.
Anti-fraud
GGGI is committed to apply transparency and accountability in its decisions and actions,
and to practice integrity in all aspects of its operations. GGGI's anti-corruption policy
establishes zero tolerance for corruption and fraudulent, coercive, and collusive practices
in GGGI's operations. The whistleblowing policy is available at the following link
https://gggi.org/site/assets/uploads/2017/11/Whistleblower-Policy_02072015.pdf
In addition, all GGGI's policies are available for open consultation under the following link:
https://gggi.org/policy-documents/
finalized, and then by a corresponding procedure. Selection will be based on the following
process. The total possible score for the Technical component is maximum 100 points.
The maximum budget available for this for each SPO is USD 26,000 inclusive of any
VAT or other taxes or costs.
A Proposal will be rejected at this stage if it fails to respond to important aspects of the
Terms of Reference or to achieve a minimum technical score of 70.
The detailed technical evaluation criteria and possible scores for each are as follows:
Maximum
Major Criteria Details & Sub-Criteria Maximum Sub-
Score
Score
Experience in issuance of Second Party Opinion in
sectors such as climate finance, green investment,
sustainable finance & related fields in the past 5
years
Experience of o 5 SPOs: 10 pts
40 40
the firm o 10 SPOs: 20 pts
o 20 SPOs: 30 pts
o 30 SPOs or more: 40 pts
Submit evidence (reports, published SPOs, links to
website of published SPOs) etc
Overall quality and detailed proposed
Proposed
methodology responsiveness to the ToR and 20 20
Methodology
detailed workplan
A team leader with a degree in finance, economics,
climate change/environmental, or related field with
at least 10 years of relevant sustainable finance
experience: 20
o 10 years of experience: 5 pts
Qualification of 40
o 15 years of experience: 10 pts
key personnel
o 20 years of experience or more: 20pts
Submit evidence (CV & Profile)
A team of at least 8 experts with prior relevant
experience in sustainable finance, green
20
10
Annex A-I. Terms of Reference
The SPO unit prices shall be submitted based on the bond’s three eligible categories:
• category 1: up to 8 criteria
• category 2: 8-12 criteria
• category 3: more than 12 criteria
The bidders shall calculate an average cost per bond category since the number of criteria could vary
in the SPOs depending on the issuer.
The maximum score for the financial component is 30 points. The maximum score shall be allocated
to the lowest priced Proposal. All other Proposals shall receive points in inverse proportion according
to the following formula:
p=y*(x/z)
where:
p = points for the financial Proposal being evaluated.
y = maximum number of points for the financial Proposal.
x = price of the lowest priced Proposal.
z = price of the Proposal being evaluated.
For the sake of the financial evaluation, the total price shall be the sum of three unit prices described
above.
Maximum two Proposals with the highest overall technical and financial score will be considered for
award of the FWA.
The tenderer shall demonstrate that its financial resources, less its financial obligations
for its current contract commitments, meet or exceed the total requirement for the
subject contract of USD 260,000. Information will be verified from Annual Financial
Statements and any other documents that verifies the availability of financial resources
submitted by the tenderer as follows:
11
Annex A-I. Terms of Reference
Financial Soundness :
Following will also be checked for financial soundness:
1. Current Ratio = (Current assets/Current liabilities)
The ideal current ratio is sometimes said to be 2 or minimum cash in hand as requested
in TOR.
2. Quick Ratio also referred as acid test , the quick ratio tests an organizations true
liquidity by assuming that stock is not immediately saleable.
Quick ratio = (Current assets) – (stock) /current liabilities
The ideal quick ratio is sometimes said to be 1
3. Check historical performance of the firm from financial statements to ensure that firm
is not facing insolvency during contract duration
4. If financial statements are in local languages , please submit all documents in English
translation
The score for the technical component is added to the score for the financial
component to arrive at the total score for a Proposal. The Proposal with the overall
highest score after this is the best Proposal. The other Proposals will be ranked in
descending numerical order based on the total score.
12
Annex A-I. Terms of Reference
2
For more reference, please visit: https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Sustainable-
finance/ICMA-Overview-and-Recommendations-for-Sustainable-Finance-Taxonomies-May-2021-
180521.pdf
13
Annex A-I. Terms of Reference
14