Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Downstream Pipelines

Safety Non-Conformance Report

SNCR Number: 2393 SAPMT In-Charge Abdullah Muh Date : 11/23/2022


Division/BI-No: DP / BI-10-09004-0003 Sub-Con/Area: SINOPEC KM-126-HDD
Contractor/Vend #: 17-SINOPEC Internation / 10032383 Supv. Info. : Mr. Liu/Liang

Description of Observation:
Operator certificate no. CAT003401 authorized to operate boom truck model no. SOOSAN SCS746L was observed operating
boom truck model no. Forukawa K-500 which he is not certified to operate.

Reference:
As per CSM 111-7 Cranes and Lifting Equipment: •
7.3.2 All crane operators shall be properly licensed and certified per GI
7.025 for the crane type/model they are using

Category : Crane Operations (Risk Matrix and Risk Tolerability Criteria on the following page)
Consequence: 3- Moderate (Med)
Probability : 3- Med
Risk /Level : 7 MED Risk must be reduced so far as is practicable

Issued by: Darius Jose Date : 11/23/2022


Action Recommended:

7.3.2 All crane operators shall be properly licensed and certified per GI 7.025 for the crane type/model they are using

Action Taken:

Closed by: Date :


(Contractor)
Verified by: Date:
(SAPMT)

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use


Downstream Pipelines
Safety Non-Conformance Report

Appendix A – Risk Matrix and Risk Tolerability Criteria


This appendix provides a generic risk matrix that is typically used in risk assessment studies. It allows the user to determine the risk by selecting the
likelihood (frequency) and severity (consequence) of the hazard. It also allows determining required risk reduction measures in a manner that is
proportional to the level of risk. Organization should ensure that their risk matrix is in line with, and as conservative as, the company and industry best
practices. The generic risk Matrix being presented in Figure 1, which is a “five-by-five” matrix Tables 1 and 2 provide the definition of Likelihood and
severity required to estimate risks.
• Table 1 provides guidance for frequency estimation for each identified hazard that will be base historical data as well as engineering judgment
• Table 2 provides guidance for consequence estimation of each identified hazard, in terms of impact on people, environment, assets, etc. and
estimated using engineering judgment
Once the frequency and consequence are analyzed, a risk level can obtained for each hazard, by Plotting the frequency and consequence in the risk
matrix. This risk can be compared against risk Criteria given in Table 3, so that its tolerability can be judged.

T a b le 1: S e v e rity / C o n s e q u e n ce
R a n k in g 1 2 3 4 5
V e ry Lo w Lo w M e d iu m H ig h V e ry H ig h
S e v e rity
( In s ig n if ic a n t) ( M in o r) ( M o d e ra te ) ( M a jo r) ( S ig n ifica n t C a ta s tro p h ic)
M in o r Em lo yee in ju ry Sin gle Em p lo yee
Em p lo yee Serio u s in ju ry
o r d a m a g e to h e a l th F a ta l i ty i r
o r h e a l th e ffe c t th a t c a n
No In ju ry o r d a m a ge n o t a ffe c ti n g w o r k p e r m a n e n t to ta l M u l ti p l e e m p l o y e e o r th i r d
P e o p le res u lt in lo s t w o rkd a ys
to h e a l th p er fo r m a n c e n o r d i s a b i l i ty i r s o m e p a r ty fa ta l i ti e s
(LT I ), R D I , o r i r r ev es i b l e
r e q u i r i n g tr e a tm e n t i m p a c t o n th i r d
h e a l th e ffe c ts
b ey o n d fi r s t a i d p a r ty

M i n o r effec t o r S e v e r e d d a m a g e to
c o n ta m i n a ti o n w i th i n Lo c a l i z e d e ffe c t w i th i n b e e x te n s i v e l y P e r s i s te n t d a m a g e e x te n d i n g
th e fe n c e w i th n o th e p l a n t fe n c e w i th r e s to r e d w i th n o o ver a la rge p u b lic a rea o r in
p er m a n en t effec t o n l i m i te d d a m a g e a n d s i g n i fi c a n t l a s ti n g e n v i r o n m e n ta l l y s e n s i ti v e
No s light
th e e n v i r o n m e n t s p o n ta n e o u s r e c o v e r y c o n s eq u en c es a r e a s w i th s i g n i fi c a n t l a s ti n g
E n v iro n m e n t e ffe c t/ d a m a g e w i th i n
c o n s e q u e n c e w i th m a j o r l o s s
a s y s te m
Sin gle ex c eed a n c e o f R e p e a te d e x c e e d a n c e o f E x te n d e d
s ta tu to r y o r p r e s c r i b e d s ta tu to r y o r p r e s c r i b e d ex c eed a n c e o f C o n s ta n t h i g h e x c e e d i n g o f
lim it lim it s ta tu to r y o r s ta tu to r y o r p r e s c r i b e d l i m i ts
p r e s c i b e d l i m i ts

M a jor da m a ge
Sligh t d a m a ge a n d /o r M in o r d a m a ge a n d /o r P a r ti a l d a m a g e a n d / o r S i g n i fi c a n t d a m a g e a n d /o r
a n d / o r o p e r a ti o n a l
E co n o m ic o p e r a ti o n a l i m p a c t o p e r a ti o n a l i m p a c t o p e r a ti o n a l i m p a c t w i th o p e r a ti o n a l i m p a c t w i th c o s t
i m p a c t w i th c o s ts
w i th c o s ts u p to $ 1 0 K w i th c o s t u p to $ 1 0 0 K c o s ts u p to $ 1 m i l l i o n a bove $10 m illion
u p to $ 1 0 m i l l i o n

Slight im pa ct a nd no N a ti o n a l p u b l i c o r
R egio n a l p u b lic o r m ed ia I n te r n a ti o n a l p u b l i c o r m e d i a
No im pa ct a nd no p u b lic c o n c ern . P u b lic m e d i a a tte n ti o n
R e p u ta tio n a tte n ti o n , c a u s i n g a tte n ti o , w i th p o te n ti a l l y
p u b lic c o n c ern o r m ed ia a w a ren es s w i th p o te n ti a l l y
c o n s id era b le im p a c t s evere im p a c t
m a y ex is t r e s tr i c ti v e i m p a c t

Figure 1: Risk Matrix


Very High 5 8 9 10 10
High 4 7 8 9 10
Medium 3 6 7 8 9
Low 2 3 6 7 8
Likelihood

Very Low 1 2 3 4 5

Catastrophic
Insignificant

Moderate

Major
Minor

Consequence

T o l e ra b i l i ty
In to l e ra b l e . R i s k m u s t b e re d u c e d a t a n y c o s t b y a p p l y i n g e n g i n e e ri n g c o n t ro l s , o r o t h e rw i s e
Red
o p e ra t i o n s h a l l n o t b e a l l o w e d t o c o n t i n u e . A c t i o n s m i s t b e re s o l v e d i m m e d i a t e l y . C o n t i n u e d
(H igh )
o p e ra t i o n s m u s t b e a p p ro v e d b y t h e M a n a g e r w i t h i n t e ri m m e a s u re s .
A s L o w A s R e a s o n a b l y P ra c ti c a b l e ( A L A R P ) . R i s k re d u c t i o n m e a s u re s m u s t b e i n c o rp o ra t e d o n
Ye llo w
t h e c o s t b e n e f i t . A c t i o n s m u s t b e re s o l v e d 4 8 H o u rs . C o n t i n u e d o p e ra t i o n s m u s t b e a p p ro v e d
(M e d iu m )
b y t h e M a n a g e r w i t h i n t e ri m m e a s u re s .
G re e n B ro a d l y A c c e p ta b l e . Im p l e m e n t m e a s u re s t o m a i n t a i n ri s k s a t t h i s l e v e l . Im p ro v e t h ro u g h
(Lo w ) a d m i n i s t ra t i v e m e a s u re s a n d m a n a g e f o r c o n t i n u o u s i m p ro v e m e n t .

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use


Downstream Pipelines
Safety Non-Conformance Report
Photo Evidence:

Saudi Aramco: Company General Use

You might also like