Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evaluation of A WeChat-based Life Review Programme For Cancer Patients A Quasi-Experimental Study
Evaluation of A WeChat-based Life Review Programme For Cancer Patients A Quasi-Experimental Study
Evaluation of A WeChat-based Life Review Programme For Cancer Patients A Quasi-Experimental Study
Running head
Xiaoling Zhang MM RN
This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not
been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may
lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as
doi: 10.1111/jan.14018
Correspondence
Email: huiminx@126.com
Conflict of interest
Funding Information
initials as appropriate)]
content;
anxiety, depression, self-transcendence, meaning in life and hope among cancer patients.
patients. However, traditional life review programs are limitedly applied in clinical practice.
Methods: 92 cancer patients were recruited from April 2017 to February 2018, with 44
patients in the control group receiving routine care and 48 in the experimental group
receiving a six-week WeChat-based life review program plus routine care. Compliance with
the program, difficulty in participation and satisfaction with the program were used to
explore its feasibility. Anxiety, depression, self-transcendence, meaning in life and hope
Results: All experimental participants who completed the program used the WeChat
platform; 39 participants had no difficulties in operating the platform and 40 were satisfied
with the program. Statistically significant effects were identified on anxiety, depression and
self-transcendence. An increase in the levels of meaning in life and hope was observed in
Conclusion and Impact: The innovative WeChat-based life review program is an effective
community-dwelling cancer patients. It could be integrated into transitional care for cancer
:
Trial registration This study was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry
KEYWORDS
nursing, internet, life review, cancer patients, anxiety, depression, self-transcendence, hope,
1 INTRODUCTION
Global cancer figure has climbed to 18.1 million in 2018, with estimated to rise about 70%
over the next 20 years (World Health Organization, 2018). Appropriately 32.5% to 75.7% of
cancer patients suffer from significant psychospiritual distress (Li & Feng 2008; Zhang et al.,
2007; Chida et al., 2008). Anxiety and depression are the most common negative emotions
in the cancer trajectory (Jørgensen et al., 2016). With the progress of the illness, the
difficulties in transcending the current predicament, seeking meaning in life and feeling a
sense of hopelessness (Henoch & Danielson, 2010; Ming, 2015). Unfortunately, most
patients do not access treatments because of geographic distance, lack of time, long waiting
enables participants to access treatment in their familiar environment that are often
perceived as anonymous, private and nonstigmatizing (Cuijpers et al., 2010). WeChat is one
of the world’s largest standalone mobile applications with over 1 billion monthly active
users by 2018 (TechNode, 2018). Due to its simplicity, convenience, efficiency and mobility,
WeChat has been gradually penetrated in various nursing fields, including nursing
management (Liu, 2015), health education (Xu, 2015) and nursing teaching (Zhang, 2015;
Zhu et al., 2015). However, very few studies have explored WeChat-based psychological
interventions.
1.1 Background
process of recalling, evaluating and integrating life experiences to facilitate the achievement
of ego integrity at the final life stage (Butler, 1963). It is grounded in Erikson’s psychosocial
development theory. According to Erikson (1950), a healthily developing human should pass
through eight developmental stages from infancy to late adulthood. The development crisis
of the last life stage is “ego integrity” vs. “despair”. Butler (1963) further pointed that
reviewing a life can facilitate participants to achieve ego-integrity and reduce despair.
Haight and colleagues (1984; 1993) have found that a successful life review should focus on
an individual’s whole life events regardless of positive or negative and provide his or her
new significance and meaning to life. Previous systematic review or meta-analysis have
also found the effectiveness of life review on patients’ enhancement of meaning in life and
self-transcendence (Wang, 2017; Ando, 2010; Chen, 2011). However, most studies delivered
a life review in a traditional face-to-face setting. Such programs cannot always be accessed
by cancer patients due to geographic distance and traffic issues. Thus, several innovative life
review programs for older adults (Preschl et al., 2012; Lamers et al., 2014) and cancer
patients (Wise et al., 2010) have been explored. For example, Preschl et al. (2012)
investigated life review therapy for older adults with depression in a face-to-face setting,
together with computer use. In the computer section, the participants were asked to write
down their positive life events and do some exercises to induce positive emotions. These
exercise focusing on recalling positively valuated episodes in their lives (Preschl et al., 2012).
This study indicated that the life review therapy in this combined setting was effective at
alleviating depression and elevating levels of self-esteem in depressed older adults. Another
study by Lamers et al. (2014) explored an online guided self-help life review program for
older adults. The participants reviewed their lives using a self-help book, rather than having
a facilitator guide them. They sought support from the researchers via e-mail. The study
findings revealed that the program was effective at reducing anxiety and depression.
Additionally, Wise et al. (2009) designed an integrated life review program for cancer
patients. This program contained a telephone-based life review interview, a text-formed life
story and a self-directed website for patients to share their personal story. The study
telephone-based life review interviews did not provide the opportunity to observe
non-verbal cues. Recently, our research team developed a WeChat-based life review
program (WBLRP) for cancer patients, based on Erikson’s psychosocial development theory
and Reed’s self-transcendence theory (Zhang & Xiao, 2018). Our program, which has been
validated by a panel of experts and patient advisers, contained four-section e-life review
interviews, Memory Prompts, Review Extraction, Mind Space and E-legacy products. This
current study aimed to examine its feasibility and effects on cancer patients’ psychospiritual
well-being.
2 THE STUDY
2.1 Aim
This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effects of the WBLRP on anxiety, depression,
chemotherapy.
2.2 Hypothesis
The hypothesis was that the WBLRP was feasible and suitable for cancer patients. When
compared with those in the control group, patients in the experimental group would have a
2.3 Design
2.4 Participants
The control group was recruited from April to July 2017 and the experimental group, from
August 2017 to February 2018. The control group data came from the Mind-map based life
review project. The study settings were two oncology departments at a medical
university-affiliated general hospital in Fujian, southeast China. The inclusion criteria for
participants were: (1) diagnosed with Stage III or IV cancer and undergoing chemotherapy;
(2) aged 18 years or above; (3) aware of their diagnosis and treatment; (4) able to access the
Internet via multiple devices, for example, a mobile phone. The exclusion criteria were: (1)
psychiatric disorder; (4) severely disabled or the disease progressing rapidly (Karnofsky
sample size (Hayat, 2013). Assuming a two-tailed alpha of 0.05, a probability of 0.02 for beta
error (80% power), an effect size of 0.42 and a standard deviation of 0.32 on anxiety (Chan
et al., 2017), a minimum of 64 participants was required. For depression (effect size 0.52
and standard deviation 1.21) and self-transcendence (effect size 0.39 and standard
deviation 0.42) (Chan. 2014, Chen, 2011), the sample sizes should have been 30 and 56
respectively. Considering an expected 20% attrition rate in this study, a total of 70 cancer
2.6 Intervention
The control group received only routine care, which included personal care, medical care,
health education and emotional support, all provided by the study hospital. The control
group participants could use the Internet freely to search for information. However, they
The intervention group received the WBLRP plus routine care. The WBLRP consisted of
four-section e-life review interviews and four life review modules, which has been published
life. The life review modules included Memory Prompts, Review Extraction, Mind Space and
E-legacy products. Memory prompts helped to evoke patients’ memories and facilitate life
review process by means of images, music, videos and audio-picture books. Review
Extraction referred to a summary of the meaningful events where patients can view and
leave their comments; Mind Space provided an opportunity to express emotions, hand
down wishes, or reveal their true feelings to anyone who is important at that stage. E-legacy
Patients in the experimental group followed the procedure below. Prior to the
intervention, they were guided to install WeChat, register an account, launch a video call
and go through each module on the WeChat platform. The process of instruction, practice
and demonstration enabled patients to master the operation of the WBLRP platform.
Additionally, they were able to consult an operation brochure. Before each session, patients
accessed the Memory Prompts Module to obtain an overview of the current session.
Subsequently, an e-life review interview was arranged, along with the creation of a family
tree or a timeline of their life. The e-life review interview was a virtual face-to-face session
with additional instant messaging methods available, including text message and voice
message, as well as emotion icons. After the life review interview, patients accessed the
24-hour open asynchronous communication modules to relive and integrate the reviewed
The WBLRP was conducted weekly over six weeks by the first author, who acted as the
facilitator. She has received approximately 50 hours of life review training. Each life review
interview ranged from 40 to 60 minutes, depending on the patient’s physical condition and
willingness to talk. During the life review process, researchers monitored participants’
physical condition, emotional status, responses to the life review’s guiding questions and
Participant characteristics were collected using a personal information form and their
education, income, religion and monthly income. Clinical characteristics included diagnosis
of disease, metastasis (yes, no), surgery (yes, no), first-time chemotherapy (yes, no) and
KPS.
We recorded whether the experimental group finished the relevant activities coordinated
by the facilitator. Compliance involved: (1) completing the four-session life review
interviews; (2) creating a family-tree and lifeline; (3) reviewing content, making
emotions, setting down wishes, or revealing true feelings on the Mind Space Module.
Additionally, the names of patients who accessed the WBLRP platform were automatically
recorded on the WBLRP platform’s back end, which was reflected in their compliance with
the program.
according to a Likert-type point scale ranging from 1 (very difficult) - 5 (very easy).
Satisfaction with the WBLRP was used to evaluate participants’ satisfaction with what they
satisfaction).
Anxiety was measured using Zung’s self-rating anxiety scale (Zung, 1971), a 20-item
four-point Likert-type scale from 1 (seldom) - 4 (most of the time). The total score ranges
from 20-80, with a score of more than 50 indicating mild to moderate anxiety. Widely used
to quantify anxiety levels, it has been proven to be reliable among cancer patients in China
Zung’s self-rating depression scale (Zung, 1965) is useful in detecting depression levels. This
four-point scale also consists of 20 items, with a total maximum score of 80. A score of more
than 53 can indicate mild depression. Good reliability has been shown with Cronbach’s
15-item scale, with each item rated from ‘1= not at all’ - ‘4 = almost always’. The total score
ranges from 15 to 60, calculated by adding all of the individual items. The Chinese version of
the scale has been validated with high reliability (α= 0.83-0.87) (Zhang et al., 2014).
consists of 10 items measuring the presence of meaning and the search for meaning. Each
item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale from ‘1 = strongly disagree’ - ‘7 = totally agree’. It has
been shown to have good reliability, with internal consistency values between 0.79-0.93
(Wang, 2008).
2.7 .3.5Hope
Hope was measured by the Herth Hope Scale (Herth, 1991), a 12-item scale comprising
three dimensions: temporality and future, positive readiness and expectancy and
interconnectedness. Good validity and reliability have been reported among patients with
lung cancer, with Cronbach’s alpha value 0.87 and construct validity 0.85 (Li, 2005).
Data were collected by two research assistants at baseline and at the six-week point
immediately after the program’s conclusion. The assistants, who were blinded to the group
assignments, collected patients’ demographic data and measured outcomes. During the
study, the assistants ensured the study’s confidential and voluntary nature and explained
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 22.0. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the
demographic data, the outcome variables, compliance with the WBLRP, difficulty in
participation and satisfaction with the WBLRP. Chi-square tests or Fisher’s Exact Tests were
used to compare the differences in the demographic and clinical variables between the
intervention and control groups. Independent sample t-test was used to examine the
differences in the scores of the five variables in the intervention and control groups.
Ethical approval was obtained from the Biological and Medical Research Ethics Committee
of the corresponding author’s university (IRB Ref No: 2016/00020) in July 2017. All
participants were assured that study participation was voluntary and that they could
withdraw from the study at any time without negative consequences. Written informed
consent was obtained from each participant. The data collected were kept confidential and
was developed to standardize the study. Second, the same researcher delivered the
the instruments used for the study were valid and reliable. Fourth, all data were carefully
checked, immediately after collection. They were crosschecked and scrutinized for errors
after being entered in SPSS. Additionally, the research team met regularly to monitor the
study’s progress and ensured the study was strictly following the protocol.
3 RESULTS
Initially, 350 cancer patients were contacted. After being assessed for eligibility, 92
participants were recruited. Among them, two participants in the control group withdrew
from the study, while four in the experimental group did not complete the intervention
phase. A total of 86 participants remained at study completion, with 42 in the control group
(Table 1). The mean age was 59.2 years (SD 11.5), with participant ages ranging from 23-80
years. In each group, over 50% of participants were male with a spouse, but without
religious affiliation. Most patients had received a secondary school education (53.40%) and
In terms of clinical characteristics (Table 2), more than 50% of participants were
diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer with a metastasis in both groups. Most had had
surgery, undergone chemotherapy and their KPS was more than 70%. There were no
A total of 44 patients in the experimental group completed the six-week life review
interviews. During the life review interviews, 75% of the patients created a family tree on
Table 3 shows participants landing on the WBLRP platform. Nearly every patient landed on
the platform and viewed the Memory Prompts module. In the Review Extraction Module,
three experimental patients (6.82%) made revisions to key life events summarized by the
facilitator; 27 patients (61.36%) supplemented with images and other relevant content; 10
patients (22.73%) left comments; and five shared the reviewed content online. A total of 24
patients (54.55%) expressed their thoughts or set down their wishes in the Mind Space
Module.
platform; four patients rated it as moderate in difficulty; and one patient rated it as difficult.
As for satisfaction with the WBLRP, most participants (90.9%) were satisfied with the
Immediately after the intervention, the anxiety scores increased from 31.50 (SD 6.515) to
32.10 (SD 5.525) in the control group and decreased from 29.84 (SD 4.524) to 25.93 (SD
3.738) in the experimental group. There was a significant difference in anxiety between the
two groups (t=6.031, P<0.01) and compared with the experimental group at
with the control group at pretest-posttest (t=-0.726, P > 0.05) (Tables 4 and 5).
3.4.2 Depression
Study results found an increase in depression scores, from 36.83 (SD 8.097) to 39.02 (SD
7.475) in the control group; and a decrease in scores, from 34.18 (SD 4.637) to 30.48 (SD
4.369) in the experimental group. When comparing the effects of the program on
depression, the independent sample t-test indicated that significant differences existed
between the two groups (t=6.434, P<0.01) and compared with the experimental group at
3.4.3 Self-transcendence
Immediately after the intervention, the self-transcendence scores increased from 43.05 (SD
6.105) to 43.90 (SD 6.585) in the control group and from 40.75 (SD 6.521) to 53.48 (SD
pretest-posttest (t=-2.244, P<0.05), but no significant differences compared with the control
There were no significant differences in meaning in life compared with the control group or
the experimental group at pretest-posttest (P>0.05) (Table 5). However, the scores of
meaning in life decreased from 50.52 (SD7.747) to 49.43 (SD 8.642) in the control group,
while increasing from 54.11 (SD 8.162) to 56.64 (SD 10.109) in the experimental group
3.4.5 Hope
Immediately after the intervention, the hope scores decreased from 36.31 (SD 2.934) to
35.14(SD 3.482) in the control group and increased from 35.86 (SD 3.092) to 36.36 (SD
3.293) in the experimental group. There was no significant difference in hope between the
two groups (t=-1.671, P>0.05) and compared with the experimental group at
This was the first study to evaluate the effects of the WBLRP on Chinese cancer
patients undergoing chemotherapy. It demonstrated that the WBLRP is feasible and suitable
for cancer patients and may be effective at alleviating cancer patients’ anxiety and
promising psychological intervention in fostering cancer patients’ meaning in life and hope.
Six participants withdrew from the study (a dropout rate of 6.52%), which was lower than
previous studies on life review conducted in a face-to-face setting (Ando et al., 2007; Xiao,
2011). In the experimental group, 44 out of 48 patients completed the e-life review
interviews, which indicated that the online life review interview was well implemented.
Possible reasons may be that the WBLRP took advantage of the WeChat platform. The
its ease of use for all age groups (Wu & Ding, 2017). It provides a range of ways to
communicate, including text and pictures, voice message and video call. This makes
simultaneous video and audio for communication between individuals possible in real-time.
The WBLRP based on the WeChat platform is enabled to conduct face-to-face e-life review
interviews, which allows the researcher to observe non-verbal cues. Additionally, the four
life review modules were designed to provide images, videos, music and audio-picture
interview process and more importantly, increases patients’ enthusiasm for participating in
the study.
operating the WBLRP platform. It may be because the facilitator provided the participants
with full instruction on the operation of the WBLRP platform until they grasped it
completely. If patients experienced any difficulties afterwards, they were able to consult an
operation brochure. In addition, several considerations were made for older adults, such as
simplifying the procedure for accessing the WeChat platform, adjusting the size of text and
Regarding cancer patients’ attitudes towards the WBLRP, most were satisfied with the
program. A possible reason for this may be because WBLRP is a convenient way for patients
to review their life, beyond the limitations of time and space. Patients can arrange for the
interview to be conducted at a convenient time and at any location. Another reason, may be
due to the fact that WBLRP provides a range of memory prompts, assisting in awakening
patients’ memories and facilitating their recall of their life. In addition, the e-legacy product
is a vivid and a convenient way for patients to review and record their memories for
younger generations. The e-legacy product can help patients appreciate their entire life all
over again and leave a personal legacy for their loved ones.
levels among cancer patients, which is in accordance with previous studies (Chen, 2011; Lin
et al., 2016). Possible reasons may be due to the fact that the WBLRP provides an
opportunity for patients to express suppressed frustrations and feelings about misfortunes,
which can release negative emotions accumulated in the heart. Although there may be
painful memories in the life review process, the facilitator would guide them to re-consider
these memories from other perspectives, help them let go, accept or even gain new insights
into their lives and ultimately achieve self-integrity (Woods et al., 2005). Another reason for
the reduction in negative emotions may be because patients retrieve more positive
memories during the WBLRP. Korte et al. (2012) have stated that the accumulation of
positive thoughts play an important part in reducing anxiety and depression. Reviewing their
entire life enables patients to awaken positive feelings from past experiences, learn from
the past and reflect on their contributions to their families and society, which may induce
positive emotions. In addition to the life review interview, the life review modules played a
vital part in alleviating patients’ negative emotions. For example, the Mind Space Module
helped patients reveal their true feelings and thoughts through words; and the Memory
Prompts Module presented a range of familiar materials that awakened positive emotions
of patients.
human beings that can be strengthened (Teixeira, 2008). Reviewing a life involves every
domain of self-transcendence. First, life review is a process of recalling and evaluating life
experiences, which can strengthen the inward domain of self-transcendence. During the
WBLRP, patients were encouraged to express their feelings and views on their life
experiences. Importantly, they were facilitated to accept, let go or give new meaning to
negative experiences. Second, the WBLRP helps patients to experience their connectedness
to the moment, self and others, which strengthens the outward domain. They can
reconsider and reflect on their relationships with others and establish a sense of connection
with their surroundings beyond their personal boundaries. One study has found that
creative activities help establish a sense of connection between individuals and their
surroundings (Chen, 2011). When patients created a family tree, it triggered their
recollections of family life. They experienced a sense of warmth as a result of thinking about
their family members, which facilitated a strong link with others. Third, the WBLRP allows
patients to further think about themselves, their illness and life, enhancing the spiritual
situation and inspires them to explore the meaning of their life, beyond the physical domain
and the limitations of their disease. When patients created their family tree or lifeline, their
reflections on their family and life were strengthened. Fourth, the WBLRP integrates
patients’ past life and future to enhance their present, which is helpful in enhancing the
temporal domain of self-transcendence. When reviewing their life, patients can collate their
modules also help to enhance self-transcendence. For example, the Mind Space Module can
patients look inside themselves and clarify their personal values, priorities and life meaning.
The Review Extraction Module is a summary of the meaningful events of each life stage and
the e-legacy product helps patients summarize and value their life once again, which can
In this study, there may not be a clear conclusion that the WBLRP exerted a significant
effect on meaning in life and hope between the two groups. However, an increase in the
scores of meaning in life and hope were revealed in the experimental group and a decrease
in the control group, immediately after the intervention. The WBLRP seemed to bolster a
sense of meaning in life and hope in these cancer patients. During the WBLRP, patients not
only expressed their feelings and thoughts and affirmed life values; more importantly, they
were facilitated to find the meaning in negative experiences and finally reconcile them.
However, future studies need to further identify the WBLRP’s effect on meaning in life and
hope.
4.4 Limitations
Several limitations may exist in this study. First, the WBLRP may not be suitable for people
with poor literacy skills, because they may encounter difficulties in completing the four life
hindered. Third, the generalizability of the findings is limited, as there was only one study
setting. Multi-center and transregional research with a rigorous design is necessary in future
research.
5 CONCLUSIONS
intervention for cancer patients. It is not only feasible, but also effective in improving
patients’ psychospiritual well-being. It could be integrated into transitional care for cancer
patients in community. Future research with rigorous design is necessary to test the effects
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Manage,39:993-1002.
Ando, M., Tsuda, A., Morita, T. (2007). Life review interviews on the spiritual well-being of
Bohlmeijer, E., Smit, F., Cuijpers, P. (2003). Effects of reminiscence and life review on
1088-1094.
Butler, R. (1963). The life review: an interpretation of reminiscence in the aged. Psychiatry,
26, 65-76.
Chan, C.L., Chow, A.Y., Wang, C.W. (2017). The effects of life review interventions on
spiritual well-being, psychological distress and quality of life in patients with terminal or
Chandwani, K.D., Ryan, J.L., Peppone, L.J, et al. (2013). Cancer-Related Stress and
Med, 2012(2):979213.
Chen, L.X. (2011). Effect of life review interviews on mental health and hoping level of
Chida, Y., Hamer, M., Molloy, G.J. (2009). Psychological distress and cancer mortality.
China Internet Network Information Center. The 42nd Statistical Report on Internet
http://www.cnnic.net.cn/gywm/xwzx/rdxw/20172017_7047/201808/t20180820_70486.
htm
Collins, K.A., Westra, H.A., Dozois, D.J.A., & Burns,D.D. (2004). Gaps in accessing treatment
for anxiety and depression: challenges for the delivery of care. Clinical Psychology Review,
24(5), 0-616.
Cuijpers, P., Van Straten, A., Warmerdam, L., & van Rooy, MarieJosé. (2010). Recruiting
participants for interventions to prevent the onset of depressive disorders: possibile ways
Davis, M.C. (2004). Life review therapy as an intervention to manage depression and
enhance life satisfaction in individuals with right hemisphere cerebral vascular accidents.
Erlen, J.A., Mellors, M.P., Sereika, S.M & Cook, C. (2001). The use of life review to enhance
quality of life of people living with AIDS: a feasibility study. Quality of Life Research, 10,
453-464.
Haight, B.K., Bahr, R.T. (1984). The therapeutic role of the life review in the elderly.
Haight, B.K., Burnside, I. (1993). Reminiscence and life review: explaining the differences.
Hanaoka, H., Okamura, H. (2004). Study on effects of life review activities on the quality of
Hayat, M.J. (2013). Understanding sample size determination in nursing research. Western
Henoch, I, Danielson, E. (2010). Existential concerns among patients with cancer and
18(3):225-236.
Hu, Z.F., Tang, L.Y., Wan,C.X., Zhang, X.Y. (2010). Using online video to report patients with
517-520.
Huang, H., Huang, J.F. (2006). Survey of negative emotions among cancer patients
Jørgensen, L., Laursen, B.S., Garne, J. P. , Sherman, K.A., & SGaard, M.(2016). Prevalence and
predictors of distress in women taking part in surgical continuity of care for breast cancer:
Kleijn, G., Bohlmeijer, E., Steunenberg, B., Bree, R., Leemans, R., Becker, A., Vorst, M. (2014).
Power of the past: a randomized controlled trial to assess effectiveness of life review
Korte, J., Bohlmeijer, E.T., Cappeliez, P., Smit, F., Westerhof, G.J. (2012). Life review therapy
Lamers, S.M.A., Bohlmeijer, E.T., Korte, J. (2014). The efficacy of life-review as online-guided
Lan, X., Xiao, H., Chen, Y. (2018). Effects of life review intervention on life satisfaction and
personal meaning among older adults with frailty. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing &
18:57-9.
Li, X.B., Wu, L. (2005). Correlation survey of social support and hope of patients with lung
Lin, F.Q., Deng H.Y., Huang D.D.(2014). The role of WeChat in the management of
Lin, H.Y., Huang, L.T., Shi, Y.R. (2016). The research of life review intervention on
psychological status of patients with end-stage cancer application. Chin. J. Gen. Pract,
14(5), 814-816.
Liu, Q.J., Zhu Y.Q. (2015). Practice of improving the quality of nursing links by using
Preschl, B., Maercker, A., Wagner, B. (2012). Life-review therapy with computer
supplements for depression in the elderly: a randomized controlled trial. Aging & Mental
Health, 16(8):964-74.
Steger, M.F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the
presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1): 80-93.
Wagner, B., Horn, A.B., & Maercker, A. (2014). Internet-based versus face-to-face
Wang, M.C., Dai, X.Y. (2008). Chinese Meaning in Life Questionnaire Revised in College
Students and Its Reliability and Validity Test. Chinese Journal of clinical psychology,
16(05):459-461.
Watson, M., Bultz, B.D. (2010). Distress, the 6th vital sign in cancer care. Psycho-Oncologie,
4(3):159-163.
Chinese Adult Emotionality Scale. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 10(4): 262-268.
"WeChat now has over 1 billion active monthly users worldwide.TechNode". TechNode. 5
Woods, B., Spector, A.E., Jones, C.A. (2005). Reminiscence therapy for dementia. The
Cochrane Library.
Wu, J., Ding, Z.R. (2017). Research on Mobile Learning Model of College English Based on
Xiao, H., Kwong, E., Pang, S. (2013). Effect of a life review program for Chinese patients with
Xiao, H.M. (2011). Development and evaluation of a life review program for Chinese
Xiao, H. , Zhang, X. , & Chen, Y. (2017). Effects of life review on mental health and well-being
74:138-48.
Xu, J. (2015). Application of Weixin Public Platform in Health Education of Medical College.
Zhang, L.M., Zhao, S.Q., Huang, W.X. (2007) .Influence of psychological nursing on cancer
Zhu T.T., Shao Y., Zhao Q.(2015). Research on Aided Teaching of WeChat Public
12(1):63-70.
2(6):371-379.
Education, n (%)
Primary school 20(23.30) 12 (28.60) 8 (18.20) 5.594 0.232b
Secondary school 46(53.40) 18 (42.80) 28 (63.60)
Cancer experience 44 44 1
Adulthood 46 46 1
After the interview
Childhood and 94 47 2
Adolescence
Summary of Life 42 42 1
a: P >0.05
b: P <0.01
c: P <0.0
a: P >0.05
b: P <0.01
c: P <0.05