Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Road Safety Campaign - Humrahi
Road Safety Campaign - Humrahi
Objectives
The program is dedicated to saving lives by enabling
people to drive better
It is an effort to connect and strengthen link with
community and all road users.
• It aims to rejuvenate care, friendliness and cordiality
in the hearts and minds of UEP employees,
contractors. & professional drivers.
• It focuses on creating awareness on major road risks
and important mitigatory controls.
Community Overview
n
n
Traits of Good & Bad Drivers
Positive Mindset & Behavior Negative Mindset & Behavior
• Defensive driving Aggressive driving
• Supportive driving Road Rage
Knowledge & awareness Red mist
Skills & Competence Noble cause
Health & Fitness Distraction
Alertness Poor Focus & attention
Focus & attention In-sufficient knowledge & awareness of vehicle, driving & highway code
Anticipation & planning Incorrect anticipation & planning
Decision making Incorrect decision making
Patience on unsafe driving by other road users Irritation, anger & haste
Confidence Incompetence & lack of skills
Compliance Poor health & fitness (use of drugs)
Incident & near miss reporting Non-compliance & non-adherence to rules
Loyal to the organization Non-reporting / hiding incident & near miss
Driver Responsibilities
Driving Safety Elements
Journey Risk Management
Fatigue
Distraction
Friend of Driver (FOD) Role
Responsibility of safe and efficient execution of journey lies jointly with the Driver and
Friend of Driver (FOD).
Pre Journey-Support:
Conduct discussions with driver on the route, duration, road hazards, speed limit &
seasonal/.
Check driving license, DDC permit, pre trip inspection checklist, load securing and
dashcam functionality include temporary hazards in audio & video recording.
Fill in JRM checklist after due verification.
Backup Slides
LEARNING FROM INCIDENT
Contractor’s Vehicle Road Accident at Kario-Golarchi Road near Rahoki (IN-20220131-005)
DESCRIPTION: On January 31, 2022, radiography contractor’s vehicle left from their camp in Matli at 5:09 pm towards company flowline project
site for carrying out radiography activity. At 5:55pm in the evening the car had a collision with a bike with 02 people onboard, mid-way between
Kario and Golarchi. The contractor evacuated the injured person to a nearby hospital for medical treatment.
WHAT WENT RIGHT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Injured person (IP) was immediately mobilized to the nearest hospital. 1. Issue NCR to contractor and sub-contractor for the breach of contract terms & conditions with
2. Considering IP criticality, site IMT proactively, took IP-1 to Bone Care Hospital immediate suspension of driver within company operation
Hyderabad. 2. Develop a plan to radiography contractor to enable engagement at least once a week
3. Update & Review RTMS procedure to ensure establishment & assurance for across the
WHAT WENT WRONG: organization:
1. Two persons got injured with multiple fractures and head injuries. a. Driver Monitoring Systems – defined, identified & performed (VTS, Dashcam, JPMs)
b. Driver Training, Assessment & Evaluation Criteria
2. One of them remained out of focus during incident management.
c. Trainer Quality Assurance
3. Incident reporting protocols were not followed by the contractor. d. Feedback Assurance via FOD process
Local
4. Training and awareness of Company Incident Management Plan was ineffective. e. Hazard Identification & Perception Settlement
Intended
5. Defensive driving training, skill assessment and driving behaviors monitoring f. Concession Road Risk Assessment movement of
IMMEDIATE CAUSES:
4.1 Distracted by other concerns: Discussion of accompanied laborers / friend of driver, in the car cabin might have
caused distraction of driver concentration.
4.2 Inattention to surroundings: Driver misjudged the situation and approached to overtake the tractor trolley without
considering the bike intending to overtake him
4.4 No warning provided: No use of indicators / warning to other road users for lane change while overtaking.
SYSTEM CAUSES:
11.7 Incorrect Judgement: Company driver did not judge the situation timely due to an oncoming loader rickshaw from
the opposite side and didn’t screen the side mirror before changing the lane for overtaking.
13.4 Incorrect behaviour not confronted: Company driver didn’t stop friend of driver against his incorrect behavior as he
caused distraction due to his continuous discussion with another occupant and driver as well. KEY LESSONS LEARNT:
15.4 Training materials not recalled: The driver did not use the defensive driving skill (advanced hazard perception) to • Drivers should be vigilant and alert
avoid the incident. Module based trainings were not recalled. while on the road
19.2 Risk assessment not effective: Before overtaking any vehicle on road or changing lane, proper risk assessment is • FOD to play his role in assisting the
required especially on a busy road, which was missed by the company driver in this case driver when required