Professional Documents
Culture Documents
La Mesa Bathymetry - December 2010
La Mesa Bathymetry - December 2010
Table 8–13 Tabulation of Water Level, Volume per Depth and Cumulative Volume
54 96 48 48
8–14
CEST, Incorporated
CONSULTANTS CO., LTD.
Comprehensive Study of the Capacity Final Report
Optimization of the La Mesa Reservoir December 2010
The depth-area and depth-volume rating curves are given in Fig. 8–3 and 8–4.
The overall data of water level, area, and volume at the time of dam construction and at the time
of the bathymetric surveys are summarized in Table 8–14.
8–15
CEST, Incorporated
CONSULTANTS CO., LTD.
Comprehensive Study of the Capacity Final Report
Optimization of the La Mesa Reservoir December 2010
Table 8–14 Overall Data of Water Level, Area, and Volume of La Mesa Reservoir
Reservoir Area (Hectares) Reservoir Volume (MCM)
Water Level July 2010
(Elevation, 2004 Feb 2010 July 2010 2004 Feb 2010 CEST-NJS
m) 1926 1926
(UP) (EDCOP) CEST-NJS (UP) (EDCOP)
The water level, area and volume relation curves of the original topography and the results of
three bathymetric surveys are as shown in Fig. 8–5.
8–16
CEST, Incorporated
CONSULTANTS CO., LTD.
Comprehensive Study of the Capacity Final Report
Optimization of the La Mesa Reservoir December 2010
Volume, MCM
W ater Level (E levatio n, m ) 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Area, Hectares
AREA (1926) AREA (2004,UP) AREA (2010, EDCOP) AREA (2010, NJS/CEST)
VOLUME (1926) VOLUME (2004,UP) VOLUME (2010, EDCOP) VOLUME (2010, NJS/CEST)
Fig. 8–6 shows the bathymetric survey map which was prepared by using the results of Feb 2010
EDCOP survey and July 2010 CEST/NJS survey.
8–17
CEST, Incorporated
CONSULTANTS CO., LTD.
Comprehensive Study of the Capacity Final Report
Optimization of the La Mesa Reservoir December 2010
The detailed bathymetric map of the Intake Towers shows the deep portion of the reservoir
adjacent to the dam. Representative cross sections are provided in Figures 8–7 to 8–11. There
was no cone of depression in the area adjacent to the structures which are evidence that the
structures’ effect on bathymetry may be insignificant.
8–18
CEST, Incorporated
CONSULTANTS CO., LTD.