Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Comprehensive Study of the Capacity Final Report

Optimization of the La Mesa Reservoir December 2010

8.2.4 Summary of Study on Sedimentation in the Reservoir by Bathymetric Survey and


Sampling Survey
The results of bathymetric survey in July 2010 by CEST/NJS are shown in Table 8–13.

Table 8–13 Tabulation of Water Level, Volume per Depth and Cumulative Volume

Elevation Area Volume per depth Cumulative


(m) (sq. m) (cu. m) Volume (cu. m)

80 3698461 3665468 38108606

79 3632474 3585570 34354658

78 3538665 3479630 30711543

77 3420595 3332049 27190660

76 3243503 3147072 23827837

75 3050640 2933615 20654903

74 2816591 2686678 17698161

73 2556766 2411540 14994151

72 2266314 2131408 12567347

71 1996502 1874916 10422243

70 1753330 1631427 8539102

69 1509523 1391424 6895502

68 1273325 1174012 5497642

67 1074700 989151 4319948

66 903603 829997 3329490

65 756391 681777 2493239

64 607162 547279 1811300

63 487396 425690 1260325

62 363984 307193 832422

61 250401 211586 524412

60 172771 144622 314049

59 116473 91554 172594

58 66636 49975 81039

57 33314 22368 31064

56 11423 7156 8696

55 2889 1492 1540

54 96 48 48

8–14
CEST, Incorporated
CONSULTANTS CO., LTD.
Comprehensive Study of the Capacity Final Report
Optimization of the La Mesa Reservoir December 2010

The depth-area and depth-volume rating curves are given in Fig. 8–3 and 8–4.

Figure 8–3 Water Level -Area rating curve (2010 by CEST/NJS)

Figure 8–4 Water Level-Volume Rating Curve (2010 by CEST/NJS)

The overall data of water level, area, and volume at the time of dam construction and at the time
of the bathymetric surveys are summarized in Table 8–14.

8–15
CEST, Incorporated
CONSULTANTS CO., LTD.
Comprehensive Study of the Capacity Final Report
Optimization of the La Mesa Reservoir December 2010

Table 8–14 Overall Data of Water Level, Area, and Volume of La Mesa Reservoir
Reservoir Area (Hectares) Reservoir Volume (MCM)
Water Level July 2010
(Elevation, 2004 Feb 2010 July 2010 2004 Feb 2010 CEST-NJS
m) 1926 1926
(UP) (EDCOP) CEST-NJS (UP) (EDCOP)

80 521.1 387.1 407.5 369.8 42.7 29.8 36.7 38.11

79 479.3 357.9 384.3 363.2 37.9 26.3 33.0 34.35

78 439.5 329.5 361.4 353.9 33.4 23.0 29.4 30.71

77 401.4 302.1 338.7 342.1 29.3 20.1 26.1 27.19

76 365.2 275.5 316.3 324.4 25.6 17.3 23.0 23.83

75 330.7 249.9 294.1 305.1 22.2 14.8 20.1 20.65

74 298.1 225.3 272.2 281.7 19.1 12.6 17.4 17.70

73 267.3 201.6 250.6 255.7 16.3 10.5 14.9 14.99

72 238.2 178.9 229.2 226.6 13.8 8.7 12.7 12.57

71 210.9 157.3 208.3 199.7 11.6 7.1 10.6 10.42

70 185.4 136.7 187.6 175.3 9.6 5.7 8.8 8.54

69 161.6 117.3 167.4 151.0 7.9 4.4 7.1 6.90

The water level, area and volume relation curves of the original topography and the results of
three bathymetric surveys are as shown in Fig. 8–5.

8–16
CEST, Incorporated
CONSULTANTS CO., LTD.
Comprehensive Study of the Capacity Final Report
Optimization of the La Mesa Reservoir December 2010

WATER LEVEL - AREA - VOLUME CURVE

Volume, MCM
W ater Level (E levatio n, m ) 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Area, Hectares
AREA (1926) AREA (2004,UP) AREA (2010, EDCOP) AREA (2010, NJS/CEST)
VOLUME (1926) VOLUME (2004,UP) VOLUME (2010, EDCOP) VOLUME (2010, NJS/CEST)

Figure 8–5 La Mesa Reservoir Water level – Area – Volume curves


(1926, 2004, Feb. 2010, and July 2010)

Fig. 8–6 shows the bathymetric survey map which was prepared by using the results of Feb 2010
EDCOP survey and July 2010 CEST/NJS survey.

8–17
CEST, Incorporated
CONSULTANTS CO., LTD.
Comprehensive Study of the Capacity Final Report
Optimization of the La Mesa Reservoir December 2010

Figure 8–6 Bathymetric Map from the Combined Data Points


of the February 2010 EDCOP survey and the current survey (July 2010)

The detailed bathymetric map of the Intake Towers shows the deep portion of the reservoir
adjacent to the dam. Representative cross sections are provided in Figures 8–7 to 8–11. There
was no cone of depression in the area adjacent to the structures which are evidence that the
structures’ effect on bathymetry may be insignificant.

8–18
CEST, Incorporated
CONSULTANTS CO., LTD.

You might also like