Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IPCRF Irvette ADAS III 2020 No Points
IPCRF Irvette ADAS III 2020 No Points
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE
per KRA
Rating 5 4 3 2 1
Financial Records and Reports Financial Records and Reports Financial Records and Reports Financial Records and Reports Financial Records and Reports
Q
was outstanding was very satisfactory was satisfactory was unsatisfactory was poor
The reviews and monitoring of The reviews and monitoring of The reviews and monitoring of The reviews and monitoring of The reviews and monitoring of
the General Ledgers, Subsidiary the General Ledgers, Subsidiary the General Ledgers, Subsidiary the General Ledgers, Subsidiary the General Ledgers, Subsidiary
Q
Ledgers and related accounting Ledgers and related accounting Ledgers and related accounting Ledgers and related accounting Ledgers and related accounting
documents was outstanding documents was very satistactory documents was satistactory documents was unsatistactory documents was poor
Reviews & Check within 1 day Reviews & Check within 2 day Reviews & Check within 3 day Reviews & Check more than 1
T Reviews & Check 1 week delayed
upon receipt upon receipt upon receipt week
The Processing of Disbursement The Processing of Disbursement The Processing of Disbursement The Processing of Disbursement The Processing of Disbursement
Q
Voucer was outstanding Voucer very satistactory Voucer was satistactory Voucer was unsatistactory Voucer was poor
•Processing of MOOE 99-90% Processing & checking 89-80% Processing & checking 79-70% Processing & checking
•Processing of Vouchers 100% Processing & checking all 69% Processing & checking all
Disbursement Voucher on January to December 15% all the completeness of all the completeness of all the completeness of 0.00 0.00
within the period prescribe E the completeness of supporting the completeness of supporting
time. supporting documents for supporting documents for supporting documents for
documents for payments documents for payments
payments payments payments
Processed within the day upon Processed within 1 day upon Processed within 2 day upon Processed within 3 day upon
T 1 week delayed
receipt receipt receipt receipt
Page 1
Department of Education
National Capital Region
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE - MALABON CITY
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE
per KRA
Rating 5 4 3 2 1
The implementation the latest The implementation the latest The implementation the latest Theimplementation the latest
The implementation the latest
Q BIR filing system was BIR filing system was very BIR filing system was BIR filing system was
BIR filing system was poor
outstanding satisfactory satisfactory unsatisfactory
Timely implementation
100% implementation of BIR the latest BIR filing system 69% Timely implementation
as per 100% Timely implementation 99-90% Timely implementation 89-80% Timely implementation 79-70% Timely implementation
eFiling and Payment System January to December 20% the latest BIR filing system as 0.00 0.00
procedures/guidelines the latest BIR filing system as the latest BIR filing system as the latest BIR filing system as the latest BIR filing system as
(eFPS) E per procedures/guidelines
and/or implementation per procedures/guidelines and/or per procedures/guidelines and/or per procedures/guidelines and/or per procedures/guidelines and/or
deadline and/or implementation deadline
implementation deadline implementation deadline implementation deadline implementation deadline
Organization &
Management
Systems
BIR filing system was submitted BIR filing system was submitted BIR filing system was submitted BIR filing system was submitted BIR filing system was
Improvement T
on time 1 week delayed 2 weeks delayed 3 weeks delayed submitted 1 month delayed
The Provided Quality & on time The Provided Quality & on time The Provided Quality & on time The Provided Quality & on time The Provided Quality & on time
Q Administrative Services reports Administrative Services reports Administrative Services reports Administrative Services reports Administrative Services reports
was outstanding was very satisfactory was satisfactory was unsatisfactory was poor
Techinical Assistance Provided Techinical Assistance Provided Techinical Assistance Provided Techinical Assistance Provided Techinical Assistance Provided
T
immidiately within the day within 1 day within 2 day within 3 day within a week
Page 2
Department of Education
National Capital Region
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE - MALABON CITY
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE
per KRA
Rating 5 4 3 2 1
Assisting in the conduct of Assisting in the conduct of Assisting in the conduct of Assisting in the conduct of
Assisting in the conduct of
Q Projects / Programs was Projects / Programs was very Projects / Programs was Projects / Programs was
Projects / Programs was poor
outstanding satisfactory satisfactory unsatisfactory
Capacity Building
Performed other task as maybe Performed other task as maybe Performed other task as maybe Performed other task as maybe Peformed other task as maybe
Q
assigned was outstanding assigned was very satisfactory assigned was satisfactory assigned was unsatisfactory assigned k was poor
*Performed other task as 100%Performed other task as 99-90% Performed other task as 89-80% Performed other task as 79-70% Performed other task as 69% Performed other task as
maybe assigned January to December 5% E 0.00 0.00
maybe assigned maybe assigned maybe assigned maybe assigned maybe assigned
100%
OVERALL RATING 0.00
FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS VS
Page 3
PART II: COMPETENCIES
The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this appraisal form and the performance rating.
Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs Timeline Resources Needed
(Recommended Developmental Intervention)